Non Valuated items

Hi all
I have some items that I have procured through Purchase Order for Asset under Construction.
After running MIRO the value of the asset has been settled but the items procured for AUC through P.O are still maintained at NIL value........
Whats the procedure for settling such items whose value is ZERO?
Thanks alot
Kanupriya Madan

Hi
I have acquired few materials for the purpose of AUC.
After running the complete cycle of P.O till MIRO the values cropped up in the Asset.
For eg if A acquired a material of 10000rs( 100 cables @Rs100) the value was reflected under the asset which was created in AUC.
But my problem is that since I have got the asset of 10000 but the materials are still lying in the materials list at nil val i.e 100cables are at nil value.
These 100 cables will always be reflected in the system.
Whats the procedure of removing such 100cables at nil value since they will always be in the system?
Thanks alot.
Kanupriya Madan

Similar Messages

Non-stock purchase for the non-valuated item

For normal valuated items, if we make it account assigned on PO, it didn't update the inventory on receipt but rather gets charged to the cost object on the PO.
Can we have similar functionality for non-valuated item.
We are having a non-valuated but stock item purchasing scenario. For this we are updating only the quantity of receipt but the value is getting charged to the cost object on PO.
Now user wants to buy same item and charge it to the specific cost object (it's oka upto this point)..AND don't want to update the quanity in inventory.
So in short can we control the no qty. update for the non-valuated item as we can control for valuated item through account-assigned purchasing.

Hi,
But why u need quantity and value both of a material should not be updated ??
Ok...
Create a Material type and go to OMS2 and click Quantity upadating and Value updating in Dialog Structure .Now Check ur valuation Area( example Plant) and do not tick Quantity upadating and Value updating check box.
Now try ur transaction and it will work without affecting quantity and value.
If helpful then reward.
Regards,
Biju K

How can we run MDBT transaction for non-valuated items only

HI,
We want to run the MDBT transaction for non-valuated items only...but through this transaction we can run for all items..
How can we run only for non-valuated items???
Regards,

Dear Anil,
MD02 - Material level planning ( Multilevel )
MD01 - Plant level planning ( Multilevel )
MDBT - Back ground MRP ( Multilevel )
coming to ur query if all 20 materials belongs to one storage location or one MRP controller
Then you perform MRP for that 20 materials with the above given user exit
Also Plz refer my reply from this thread
[Re: MD01 Replanification.]
Regards
Madhu

Non-Valuated Items for Repair

Hi Gurus,
For In-House repair scenario, I am using RA (Return-Repair) SD document. With Inbound delivery, System is posting accounting document which is giving not required
As per requirement, it should remain non-valuated only. How I can achieve this without using new material code creation?
regards
Ravi

Hi,
As you may be aware, account determination is determined in "Valuation and Account Assignment" under MM module.
Valuation class of the metrial and movement type along with certain other customizing settings determine the account determination.
Your return delivery has a predefined movement type. Please see the sttings under SPRO>Material Management>Valuation an account assignment>Account determination>Account determination without wizard-->Define account grouping for movement types (Transaction: OMWN). Please see whether your return delivery movement type is assigned any value updation. If there is any wrong value updation, please correct the same.
If this solves your problem, kly acknowledge the same.
Muraleedharan.R
091 9880028904

Non value item

Iam doing sales for non value item.when iam creating sales order system hitting error no accounting data maintained for the meterial.
Is it necessary to maintain in material master accounting data for non value items.
Is it possible to procure non value items from the vendor and send the goods forigen customers.
any one give me solution.

Dear mahi
As per standard, if a same material is inwarded and also outwarded, the material code should be different.
So first even if you inward the material with non valuate, you should create another material code with either material type as Halb or Fert. Then only, the respective inventory / sales will be transferred to FI. Moreover, for non valuated items, system will not consider the inventory and without considering this, how will you make a delivery. Also you would be aware, for non valuated items, 601 movement will not take place.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

PO Item : Delivery Tab - Goods Receipt and GR Non-Valuated

Dear all,
User highlighted for a PO which she was not able to do GR. When checked, we found that the line item, with account assignment "K" - the Goods Receipt and GR Non Valuated indicator is unticked. User further claim that, she did not untick both of these checkbox.
These were the steps which i have done:
1. Checked the config: IMG > MM > Purchasing > Account Assignment > Maintain Account Assignment Categories.
Here i have confirmed that Goods Receipt, GR Non Valuated are already pre selected.
2. Scanned thru the whole list of User Exit found under ME21N. No enhancement related to these two fields were found.
3. Manually create a PO, with similar data in test server -- both the checkbox are pre selected by default.
Given the checking done above: If user did not manually untick the checkbox -- where else / how else can Good Receipt and GR Non Valuated indicator be unticked ?
Please .. appreciate it if someone could shed some lights on this area.
Thanks in advance.

Dear All,
Many thanks for the prompt reply.
Siva,
In this case, the PO line item doesn't involve a material number. Therefore PIR is eliminated.
Jurgen,
Yes, i did actually simulate from scratch, the creation of this PO. Both the goods receipt and gr non valuated checkbox were actually ticked. It didn't jive with user's feedback which claim the boxes were originally unticked already.
Sudhir,
Yup, as material number is not involved, therefore PIR and material master is eliminated.
Thru out the day, am quite glad to make some discovery. The PO was actually converted from a PR. And guess what ?
In the PR itself, these two checkbox were already unticked ! I then simulated this scenario - create PR with untick checkbox and convert it to PO. And voila ! in the PO, both checkbox were untick as well.
Now am in the midst of finding out -- why in the PR, at the very first place, goods indicator and gr non valuated are unticked. Checking with the process owner, as the PR was generated automatically.
Thank you very much !

Non-valuated Goods Receipt for Purch.Order Item with multiple acct assgnt

Dears,
i used multiple account assignment functionality based on percentage for purchase order item and the system forced the goods receipt as "Non-valuated Goods receipt".
In this way i don't have FI-CO documents at Goods receipt; i got them only at Invoice verification. So i totally lose analysis on account "Invoice to Receive".
Please, give me some suggestion if you know something in matter.
Thanks in advance,
Regards
Enrico

It means that i didn't set non-valuated goods receipt.
The system automatically set the flag if more than one account assignment are used for one purchase order item.
If happens that just one account asignment is used for one purchase order item then the goods receipt is still valuated.
i didn't try so far with quantity instead of percentage but, anyway, i need to use percentage.

Reg:How can we show non valuated stock in the system for the paid items?

Hi All,
Customer orders 100 boxes and pays to all material.But customers are shipped the required material as and when required.My client requirement is these 100 boxes should show as non valuated stock.
How can we show these paid 100 boxes of material as non valuated stock in the sap? Is this functionality available in sap or it comes under requirement?
Ex:Customer X ordered 100 boxes and he paid to all quantity.
The customer X does not have space at his premises to keep the stock of 100 boxes.He just requests 20 boxes every monday or required quantity.Then company ships the required quantity to customer X.
Now the requirement is that these 100 boxes should be shown as non valuated stock in the system.This should not used for other customers, should not work ATP functionality for these material quantity.This should show as reserved to this customer X
could you share any ideas or solutions reg this..
Thanks in advance,
Regards....VM
Edited by: vm on Mar 9, 2009 3:46 PM

Hi Arnel,
Thank you for giving valuable points.
In consignment scenario,the stock is available at customer place not at company place.But ownership is company itself.
But in this scenario,Customer is not having space to keep the total ordered quianty.So cutomer stock should be kept at company itself,customer requests the required quantity(for which he already paid for the total ordered quantity) as and when required.How can it suits in this scenario?Could you plz calirfy the debit memo to realize sales ?How it will be help ful?
Thanks and regards...VM
Edited by: vm on Mar 10, 2009 9:19 AM

FI MM integration _ Non valuated GRN

Hi
In FI MM integration if you acquire an asset through PO the asset value gets captured automatically.
For single asset - One PO one asset - there is no problem - at the time of MIGO (Goods receipt) the GRN becoems "valuated" and asset get the value automatically.
For multiple account assignement - One PO - MORE THAN ONE ASSETS - the GRN becomes "non valuated " (automatically- the field is grayed out). The account document will not be generated. The asset value will be captured on the MIRO date.
1) Would it be a good practice? Ideally asset value date should be GRN date ..
2) If anyone has worked on this - pl. guide me as to how can i valuate the GRN for multiple account assignment.
regd
Vedavatee

Yes Veda,
When you have multi account assignement in PO, GRN Non-valuated option automatically de-activated (greyd out).
ME23N - Item data - Delivery - GR Non-Valuated
This is Standard SAP behaviour.
At the time MIRO, the entry will post as per the Account assignment given in PO - Splitting structure.
There is no other way to do it.
PO - Multi account assignment - GRN Non-valuated.........This is right approch as of today
You are correct, go ahead
Thanks

Purchasing - A/P Transaction Processing for Services and Non Inventory Item

On of the main areas of concern that businesses have is in the area of Purchasing, Goods Receipts and AP Invoices Processing - There is a requirement that businesses have widely referred to as 3-way matching.
While SAP Business One has this functionality covered quiet well via the following, there is still some need for enhancements so that the application can correctly reflect the AP Accruals:
- Purchase Order processing with Approval Process (if configured)
- Ability to perform Goods Receipts for Services.
- Matching of AP Invoices to Goods Receipts with AP Invoice Approval Process (if configured)
The above transactions serve the 3-way matching quiet well for all purchases however when it comes to accuring for Services that have been provided, the application does not do this. The Goods Receipt transaction processing to acknowledge the service delivery is allowed however the related posting to the allocation account is missing.
The process that is followed by the application is same for Items that have not Inventory Items in Item Master.
As a result of the above, the business have to manually work out what the Accurals for services provided but not invoiced should be.
With little enhancement to the product this shortfall could very easily be overcome.

Hi,
Once there are transactions, we cannot make existing Inventory type item to Non Inventory type item.
Check SAP note:937297 which states as follows :
Symptom
Changing the status of the Inventory Item checkbox (in Item Master Data) for items with inventory transactions and documents, might lead to inaccuracies in the calculations of inventory value.
Other terms
Inventory Item, Non-inventory Item, Item Master Data, Continuous Stock, Perpetual Inventory, Inventory Valuation, 2004, 2005, 2005 A SP01
Reason and Prerequisites
Consulting Note
Solution
The status of an item (Inventory Item/Non-Inventory item as selected in the Inventory Item checkbox in the Item Master Data window), cannot be changed once an A/P, A/R, or Inventory document is posted for the item.
Regards,
Jitin Chawla

Use of GR receipt , IR receipt and GR - non valuated options in PO

I want to know what is the use and effect of GR receipt , IR receipt and GR - non valuated options in PO.
Pls help.

Hi
GR-Non valuated:
Set the indicator if goods receipts involving this material are not to be valuated. The valuation of the purchase order item will then take place at the time of invoice verification.
This indicator must be set in the case of multiple account assignment for example.
IR receipt:
Specifies whether an invoice receipt is linked to the purchase order item.
You can not do LIV if this indicator is set.
If the indicator is not set, the goods are to be delivered free of charge.
Goods Receipt;
Specifies whether a goods receipt is linked to the purchase order item.
You can not do GR if you set this indicator.
If GR indicator is set, GR-non valuated Indicator also need to be set.
Cheers!
***reward If Useful (RIU)

Very Urgent--- How to Convert Non Valuated stk into Valuated

Dear GURU'S
Actually for a material A when i see the stock in MM03 in accounting tab i see less stock then when i see in MMBE
i.e in MMBE if i select Material A and Plant B(Which is depo in my case) i see stock as 39
but for same material MAterial A and Plant B ,if i see in MM03 --in accounting tab i m able to see less stock i.e only 1
============================================
Well the problem is In MM03 I cud see only valuated stk i.e qty as 1
And in MMBE for a partiocular material for a particular plant the stock was 39
i.e Here i am getting Valuated + Non valuated stock
i.e i am getting difference of 25
=====>>>
To get into the root cause
I have gone to MB5B where i can get all the transaction that has been done on this material with movement type also i got the intial stock ,Goods recpt ,Goods issu and total stock
No for a particular material
In MB5B it is showing
Stock on 01.01.2005    = 38
receipts total               = 238
Issues total                  =237
Stock as on 18.02.2008 = 39(which is equal to Stock in MMBE)
=============>This is for valuated +Non valuated stock
Where as if i want to see only valuated stock it was showing
receipts total      = 238
Issues total         =237
Stock as on 18.02.2008 =1 (which is equal to stock in acctg view in MM03)
====================>This is only for Valuated Stock
======================================
Now how to solve this :
The initial qty(38) which has been posted it was at the begining that is at the start of the project
And the people who have posted it ,it was non valuated
that is the reason it is showing difference in MM03 and MMBE
First thing
How can i see on which date this initial stock has been posted
Second Query
How to convert this non valuated stock into Valuated stock
So that the quantity in MMBE and MM03 gets matched
Willl award 10 Points if my problem gets solved
THANKZ IN ADVANCE
REgds
Shailesh

Dear friend
Actuallly i have checked the history of that particular Item in MB51
I have gone through all the documents created for this material
Now this material also exist in DEPO which is located at chennai and plant is at mumbai
So Initially in the year-2006(31-10-2006) whater documents are created i.e STOP has been created and delivery has been made (Mov type-601)
are non valuated stock ,means they have been posted without any valuation
But from year 2007(01.02.2007) the documents whiohc have been posted are valuated
i.e is the reason when i am executing transaction MRN9 to check the history of valuated stock
I cant see non valuated stock
Well now how to do the valuation of this stock which have been posted in year 2006 so that
In MMBE and MM03 there is no difference of stock
Plz hepl
regds
shailesh

Sales Order -Valuated, non valuated

Hi,
I am getting an error while saving a sales order containing Variant Configured Material. The Error description is " Sales Order is non valuated".
Where do we make the config settings regarding valuation of a Sales order?i.e.valuated or non valuated? Is this valuation of Sales order controlled at item category level?
Regards

Hi Mrinal,
Following links may help you :--
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/90/ba6cba446711d189420000e829fbbd/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/90/ba6cba446711d189420000e829fbbd/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_pserv464/helpdata/EN/90/ba6db1446711d189420000e829fbbd/content.htm
http://www.siliconlabs.fi/files/SL_SD_ACCT/SL_SD_Accounting.html
Thanks & Regards
Rajesh

Stock Transport for Non Valuated Account Assigned Material

Hi Experts,
I have to satisfy some unique requirement from my demanding FICO team to make certain process work our way.
Following is the scenario...
1. Plant A and plant B belongs to the same company.
2. Plant A makes material X (non valuated, ind/coll indicator = 1).
3. X calls for sub-assembly Y (non valuated, ind/coll indicator = 1) which is a make item in plant B. X and Y belongs to different Profit Centers
4. Sales order placed at plant A for material X.
5. MRP runs and creates a stock transport order in plant A to buy the non valuated material Y from plant B. STO is account assigned to the sales order.
6. Plant B makes the material Y by creating a production order that is account assigned to the same sales order and does PGI to ships it out to plant A.
7. Plant A GRs the material Y and this puts it in sales order stock. No value move, just qty move. Also no FI document created.
8. Plant A issues component Y to the production order created for material X. Cost of Y doesn't show up in the production order as it is non valuated.
9. Upon settlement of the production order in Plant B, the ACTUAL cost gets settled to the sales order in plant A. So at the time of settlement the profit center switch happens for Y (i.e. the profit center for Y changes to match X's profit center)
This is a beautiful process from logistics point of view. BUT, my FICO has unique requirement for inter company sales for our organization. For them to consider a process as inter company sales, the following constraints has to be met...
1. Ownership of material remains with producing profit center until consumption by the receiving object. (with the above mentioned process the profit center switch happens during prod. order settlement)
2. Cost for the consuming profit center will be moving average, standard cost or planned cost. (we are dealing with non-valuated materials and the settlement happens at actual cost)
I need your expertise to help me define a work aroud. I am thinking about a lot of options to somehow make it work but can't seem to get solutions. Following are my thoughts...
1. Is it possible to possible to make the settlement with planned cost instead of actual cost?
2. Is it possible to make a profit center switch during consumption rather during settlement?
3. Is it somehow possible to create an underlying FI document during GR at plant A? (I know SAP does not create a FI doc. for non valuated materials).
4. Or can plant B send an invoice to plant A for the STO? (I believe this can be done for cross-company STO) I am thinking doing an Invoice Receipt at plant A instead of doing a settlement might show up the cost for Y in the production order for X.
An IR with the planned cost would be an awesome solution to get the buy-in from FICO. Can this be done?
I hope you don't mind my lengthy message... Waiting for some positive response.
Thanks.

Anyone??? This is kinda urgent?

Make-to-order: COPS for KMAT materials (Non-valuated sales stock)

Hello,
We are working with KMAT configurable material (i.e. non valuated sales order stock).
The client is requiring that inventory of these KMAT material should be shown in the financial accounting;however as we work with KMAT, this seems not possible.
The whole process is:
- taking of the sales order with the configuration
- MRP and Production order Execution
- Settlement of the PO to the sales order
- Settlement of the Sales orden to a given account in FI (just like "stock for customer order") - inventory.
The problem we are facing now is how to make the compensation of this account once the product is delivered.
It seems the sales order's default settlement receiver is only the PSG. can we have to use the result analysis key to calculate the cost of sales, and which valuation method can we use if I only want to settle the actual cost that settled from the production order.
By the way, I have search for the notes:Note 26459 it seems we have to run the sales cost estimate first for the KMAT.
Summary
Symptom
It is not possible to perform results analysis on sales order items with materials of material type KMAT.
Additional key words
Transactions KKA3, KKAK
Cause and prerequisites
In make-to-order production, the inventory and the cost of sales are not posted through goods movements because the materials are managed in a non-valuated sales order stock. The only way to create postings in FI is to use results analysis (see Note 26456). If the sales order item consists of a material of material type KMAT, results analysis is not possible because no cost estimate exists for this material.
Solution
Results analysis must be performed with a valuation method that uses profit basis C. With this profit basis, the system uses the planned costs of the production orders for the sales order instead of a cost estimate for the KMAT material.
In Release 2.2 a modification is needed for this which is described in Note 25772. In Release 3.0 this function is provided as standard.
From 3.0C onwards the planned costs of the sales order can also be calculated in a product cost estimate for the sales order. You should use profit basis E in this case.
However, if you are using assembly processing with production orders, you can only use profit basis C.
Hope the scenario is clear. Perhaps you have a different approach to work with KMAT materials.
Regards

Hi Friends,
Can you please provide the solution for my problem and its slight urgent.
Regards
Goutham

Non Valuated items

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for