Nvidia-173xx available for xorg 1.10

Accordingly to
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpos … stcount=12
Nvidia has released drivers compatible with xorg 1.10. Any plans to add this package again in extra repositories?
ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86/173.14.30/

Korrode wrote:now it's just the 96xx'ers still hoping they're not hung out to dry
I am a 96xx user, not upgrading to Xorg1.10.
I am just wondering though, shouldn't the installed nvidia96xx drivers conflict (and thus get deleted by pacman ) with the xorg 1.10 upgrade?

Similar Messages

  • Nvidia with support for xorg 7.1 is out!

    http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_disp … -8774.html
    AIGLXAIGLXAIGLXAIGLXAIGLX! :-D :-D

    Even a bleeding edge distro like Arch has to be careful about upgrades. We want to be up to date, but at the same time we don't want to worry that a "pacman -Syu" is going to hugely break our systems without warning. Anyone running an Nvidia card would have been awfully upset when their chosen distribution chose to break their previously flawless 3d acceleration. Given that it was reasonable to assume that Nvidia would produce a driver fairly soon (as indeed they have) I have no problem with the fact that the decision was made to delay the transition for a little while.
    Surely if Nvidia had broken their tradition of above average Linux support the move to X.org 7.1 would have been made regardless. I don't think the plan was ever to wait "as long as it takes."
    I like open source software a lot myself. If my every whim were to be satisfied, running a completely free-as-in-freedom system would near the top of my list. However, nothing ever gets done without compromise. A person has to give as they take. They give a driver, and we give by relaxing our principles a little. Is that wrong, or is that cooperation?
    Stiff positions with no wiggle room don't solve problems or get you what you want. They start wars. Obviously a war over device drivers is what they call "unlikely", but the same mistrust, ill wishes, and lack of progress that wars entail are what you'll get. You've got to examine the trade-offs, and make a decision on a case-by-case basis. Sometimes you just can't work with the other guy. Much more often, you can.
    The question is whether what Nvidia is doing is so awful and anti-freedom that we can't let it slide. You contend that it is, and if we use their system we'll be trapped in a hell of proprietary drivers and vendor-controlled computers. I contend that you're probably wrong.
    It seems preferable to control your life completely. Do what you want, when you want. Sounds nice. In the real world we depend on others for nearly everything in our lives. There is nothing wrong with that. What is wrong is when the others we depend on attempt to force unfair terms on us. Nvidia isn't doing that. It's not unfair to keep their driver secrets to themselves. It's not the most generous thing to do, but none of us are as generous as we could be. Self-interest is par for the course in human affairs.
    There is such a thing as "free enough" and it falls short of a completely open system. "Free enough" is different for everyone, but for me running a system which is entirely free software except for a few well-supported drivers is free enough to get by. Nvidia isn't stopping me from using my computer as I want. In fact, they're helping me to do it, by providing functional drivers that don't attempt to control me (as DRM software does, for example).
    Would a fully free system be better? Possibly. I would like it better. More important though, is to say *why* it would be better. If the driver in question behaves like a "by us, for us" driver would, is available gratis, and comes with no odious restrictions, where is the problem? If they give us what we would make ourselves (or better), why complain?  Because using free software gives us a warm, fuzzy feeling that proprietary software can't match. We like to feel "in control" of our computers even when that control would buy us nothing.
    There are cases in which it's better not to be beholden to your vendors. Unsupported and poorly supported hardware is trouble. In that case, "open source or we won't buy" is completely appropriate. That company doesn't take care of its customers. Well-supported hardware? Not so much. Paranoia about running proprietary code rears its head. We're afraid of losing control over our systems, because we don't trust these evil proprietary corporations. After all, they're not with us, so they must be against us, right? Wrong. Nvidia isn't the enemy. They're a company that makes a product, and we are their customers. They've shown through their actions that they care about us enough to support us. That could change, but so could a lot of things. No one can be in your corner all the time. For the time being, Nvidia is.
    In an interdependant world, ultimatums are nothing more than sand clogging up the machinery of society. There are freedoms that we should under no circumstances surrender, and there are those which we can trade, for our long term or short-term good. The freedom to control our computers? Let's hold on to that one. The freedom to modify every single piece of software on the computer? Maybe being able to modify nearly every single piece of it is enough, as long as we are free to add or remove the unmodifiable software as we wish.
    Deciding where to draw the line is a hairy question. Unfortunately, dodging that question by adopting an absolutist philosophy isn't an option. One extreme leaves you with no control over your computer. The other sounds nice until you remember that most of the world does not want to operate like you do. If you won't work with others, then they won't work with you. Big companies don't come around to your way of thinking just because they like you.
    I mention Nvidia a lot, because they're the topic of the day. Other situations are different, which is my entire point. One-size-fits-all answers are wrongs answers.
    Each situation must be evaluated according to its own merits. Sometimes "good enough" is good enough. I'd say this is one of those times.
    markzzzsmith wrote:If you think I'm a open source "zealot", and binary and proprietary device drivers are quite ok, then I'm afraid you just don't get what open source is actually about. Linux wouldn't be where it is today if it wasn't for a very large number of manufacturers opening their programming specifications. I know this to be a fact, I've been using it since 1992, many years before the first binary driver showed up. The only way we could run it in those days was to use hardware with open programming specifications. If you're now using Linux with proprietary drivers, you're now supporting the idea of closed hardware specifications, which would have prevented Linux's birth in the first place. Would you much rather have not had Linux available ? Encouraging vendors to close their specifications by accepting that decision and continuing to buy their hardware will cause that to be the eventual result.
    I think you're too uncompromising: that's what I think. I'm very glad that many manufacturers have made it possible to produce free software drivers, and that we have the Linux we have today.
    I also think that your crystal ball is at least as foggy as mine. There's no way you can say for sure whether using proprietary drivers will ruin our free system or not. Perhaps favoring free drivers while reaching out to proprietary software companies will be more effective.
    Linux might not have gotten of the ground without using only free software, but now is not then. Linux is well-established, as is free software. Perhaps now is the time to gain ground in another way (I sound like ESR here).
    EDIT: This is way longer than I'd like it to be, but I've edited it as best I can right now.

  • [SOLVED] Build nvidia-173xx (173.14.31-7) for linux-ck-kx (3.4.1-2)

    I need a bit of help here. For a few months I have been using the proprietary nvidia-173xx driver for my old NV34 / GeForce FX 5200 (I have a downgraded xorg-1.10 and a compatible nvidia-173xx-utils (173.14.31-1)).
    I have four kernels, and I used to be able to build the nvidia-173xx module without problems for all four kernels.
    However, after the recent upgrade from linux-ck-kx-3.3 to linux-ck-kx-3.4 I can no longer build the nvidia-173xx for this kernel (but it still builds fine for the three other kernels on my system).
    Here is the error I receive:
    $ makepkg -sfci
    ==> Making package: nvidia-173xx-ck-kx 173.14.31-7 (Wed Jun 6 10:46:18 EDT 2012)
    ==> Checking runtime dependencies...
    ==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
    ==> Retrieving Sources...
    -> Found NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-173.14.31-pkg0.run
    -> Found generated.patch
    ==> Validating source files with md5sums...
    NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-173.14.31-pkg0.run ... Passed
    generated.patch ... Passed
    ==> Extracting Sources...
    ==> Starting build()...
    Creating directory NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-173.14.31-pkg0
    Verifying archive integrity... OK
    Uncompressing NVIDIA Accelerated Graphics Driver for Linux-x86_64 173.14.31....................................................................................................................................
    patching file conftest.sh
    Makefile:339: /lib/modules/3.4.1-2-ck/build//Rules.make: No such file or directory
    make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/lib/modules/3.4.1-2-ck/build//Rules.make'. Stop.
    make: *** [module] Error 2
    ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
    Aborting...
    I don’t know what to make of this error ; I’ve looked in `/lib/modules/<kernel-versions…>…' but I don’t see any file named `Rules.make' in there…
    Here are the files I use for building the modules (they are all slightly customized PKGBUILDs based on AUR/nvidia-173xx) :
    core/linux               --> PKGBUILD  --> nvidia.install
    core/linux-lts           --> PKGBUILD  --> nvidia.install
    AUR/linux-lts-ck       --> PKGBUILD  --> nvidia.install
    repo-ck/linux-ck-kx  --> PKGBUILD  --> nvidia.install
    In this list, #1-3 still build without a hitch, only #4 throws the error I pasted above. Ideas? Thanks in advance!
    Last edited by Montague (2012-06-07 21:53:12)

    Well nevermind, I don’t know what I was doing wrong before, but with yesterday’s update of nvidia-173xx (patch not longer required) and nvidia-173xx-utils in the AUR, I was able to upgrade to X.org-1.12, and I re-built the nvidia module for all my kernels. I now have a fully current arch system, yay !
    In case this is useful to anyone, here are the slightly modified PKGBUILD and nvidia.install that I used (based on natrio’s package in the AUR)

  • [SOLVED] xorg update has broken nvidia-173xx driver

    Hi,
    I've been using arch for around 2 and a half months on 2 computers (a dell Inspiron 2200 and an old home built pc). So far I've been able to figure out most things myself.  However, following today's xorg update x seems to be broken. My laptop, which does not use nvidia, seems to be fine. On the pc i installed the i686 version and am running kde 4.5.1
    I have reinstalled nvidia-173xx and nvidia-173xx-utils, and run nvidia-xconfig but this has not helped any.
    Although the installation is carried out there is an error stating:
    ERROR: Module nvidia does not exist in /proc/modules In order to use the new nvidia driver, exit xserver and unload it manually
    A google search on the above error didn't advance me any further, either.
    I have also waited for today's kernel update but that hasn't seemed to fix things.
    If I run "startkde" i get an error message stating that it can't connect to the x server.
    "startx" says much the same only more verbose.
    /var/log/Xorg.0.log has the following information :
    dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_dvr.so undefined sym$
    failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_dvr.so
    unloadable module "nvidia"
    failed to load module "nvidia" (loader failed, 7)
    I've done a lot of esearch but can't find any solutions to my issue. The following thread seems to be related :
    https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=103716
    but i can't seem to find an answer there either.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Cheers
    Last edited by rabid_works (2010-09-29 19:32:42)

    ok, went to downgrade using
    #pacman -U ...
    but i have yet another error due to a conflict between files :
    xorg-server: /usr/lib/xorg/protocol.txt is already present in the file system
              xorg-server: /usr/share/man/Xserver.1.gz is already present on the file system
              xorg-server; /usr/share/xkb/README.compiled is afready present in the file system
    is it possible to safely force the installation?
    sorry if thatś a lazy question but I've been looking at this for so long that i can't fathom the idea of futher searching.
    EDIT: ok, i had a break and realised it'd be safer to simply rename and the delete the problematic files. The downgrade went fine. I have X back.
    thanks for the help.
    Last edited by rabid_works (2010-09-29 18:52:27)

  • Error message when installing nvidia-173xx package

    I get an error message when I try to install nvidia-173xx driver:
    pacaur -S nvidia-173xx
    :: Package(s) nvidia-173xx not found in repositories, trying AUR...
    :: resolving dependencies...
    cat: /usr/lib/modules/extramodules-3.15-ARCH/version: No such file or directory
    :: no results found for linux
    :: no results found for linux-headers
    My kernel version: 3.16.1-1-ARCH
    What can I do to install it correctly?

    nvidia-173xx AUR page wrote:inux>=3.15.5
    linux<3.16
    linux-headers>=3.15.5 (make)
    linux-headers<3.16 (make)
    nvidia-173xx-utils
    Looks like you can choose from :
    -contact the maintainer to see if you can help with getting it to work with kernel 3.16
    - downgrade the kernel
    - switch to nouveau
    Note that there are comments on the aur page that state nvidia-173xx doesn't work with xorg 1.16, so you may have to downgrade more then just the kernel.

  • Cannot Ctrl+Alt+F1 after nvidia-173xx update

    I have recently discovered that I cannot switch into "terminal mode" with the latest nvidia-173xx drivers (nvidia-173xx-173.14.25-1 and nvidia-173-xx-utils-173.14.25-1). Whenever I do Ctrl+Alt+Fn, the screen goes black with no terminal prompt. Then the only thing to do is Ctrl+Alt+F8 (F8 instead of F7, as it used to be) to go back to the X11 session.
    This happens also if I logout from KDE and select "Console login" from within the KDM menu: the screen just goes black (after flickering a bit): in this case the only solution is to wait for KDM to kick in and display the (GUI) login screen.
    An other thing I discovered is that, when I shutdown/restart the computer and the X11 session is terminated, the screen goes back to terminal mode but the display (and all those messages about services going down) is dimmed down.
    The temporary solution for me is to go back to the previous version: nvidia-173xx-173.14.22-4 and nvidia-173-xx-utils-173.14.22-4. Here everything is fine (going to console mode, screen during shutdown, etc.)
    Here it is my xorg.conf:
    Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier "Layout0"
    Screen "Screen0" 0 0
    InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
    Option "Clone" "off"
    Option "Xinerama" "off"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    EndSection
    Section "ServerFlags"
    Option "AllowMouseOpenFail" "on"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    # generated from default
    Identifier "Mouse0"
    Driver "mouse"
    Option "Protocol" "auto"
    Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
    Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no"
    Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    # generated from default
    Identifier "Keyboard0"
    Driver "kbd"
    Option "Protocol" "Standard"
    Option "XkbLayout" "ca"
    Option "XkbModel" "microsoftpro"
    Option "XkbOptions" "compose:rwin,terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp"
    Option "XkbRules" "xfree86"
    Option "XkbVariant" "multi"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "Monitor0"
    VendorName "Acer"
    ModelName "X183H"
    HorizSync 31.0 - 80.0
    VertRefresh 55.0 - 76.0
    Modeline "1360x768@60" 84.50 1360 1392 1712 1744 768 783 791 807 -HSync +Vsync
    Option "DPMS"
    Option "DPI" "96x96"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "Device0"
    Driver "nvidia"
    VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation"
    BoardName "GeForce FX 5200"
    Option "RenderAccel" "True"
    Option "TripleBuffer" "True"
    Option "PixmapCacheSize" "300000"
    Option "OnDemandVBlankinterrupts" "True"
    Option "IgnoreEDID" "True"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Screen0"
    Device "Device0"
    Monitor "Monitor0"
    DefaultDepth 24
    Option "ConnectToAcpid" "False"
    SubSection "Display"
    Depth 24
    Modes "1360x768@60"
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    And here you have my kdmrc (in case it is of any help):
    [General]
    ConfigVersion=2.4
    ConsoleTTYs=tty1,tty2,tty3,tty4,tty5,tty6
    PidFile=/var/run/kdm.pid
    ReserveServers=:1,:2,:3
    ServerVTs=-7
    StaticServers=:0
    [Shutdown]
    BootManager=None
    HaltCmd=/sbin/halt
    RebootCmd=/sbin/reboot
    [X-*-Core]
    AllowNullPasswd=false
    AllowRootLogin=false
    AllowShutdown=Root
    AutoReLogin=false
    ClientLogFile=.xsession-errors-%d
    Reset=/usr/share/config/kdm/Xreset
    Session=/usr/share/config/kdm/Xsession
    SessionsDirs=/usr/share/config/kdm/sessions,/usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions
    Setup=/usr/share/config/kdm/Xsetup
    Startup=/usr/share/config/kdm/Xstartup
    [X-*-Greeter]
    AntiAliasing=false
    ColorScheme=Oxygen
    FaceSource=AdminOnly
    FailFont=Sans Serif,10,-1,5,75,0,0,0,0,0
    ForgingSeed=1250611569
    GUIStyle=Oxygen
    GreetFont=Serif,20,-1,5,50,0,0,0,0,0
    GreetString=Welcome to %s at %n
    GreeterPos=50,50
    HiddenUsers=
    Language=en_US
    LogoArea=Logo
    LogoPixmap=/usr/share/apps/kdm/pics/kdelogo.png
    MaxShowUID=65000
    MinShowUID=500
    Preloader=/usr/bin/preloadkde
    SelectedUsers=
    ShowUsers=NotHidden
    SortUsers=true
    StdFont=Sans Serif,10,-1,5,50,0,0,0,0,0
    Theme=/usr/share/apps/kdm/themes/oxygen-air
    UseBackground=true
    UseTheme=true
    UserCompletion=false
    UserList=true
    [X-:*-Core]
    AllowNullPasswd=true
    AllowShutdown=All
    NoPassEnable=false
    NoPassUsers=
    ServerArgsLocal=-nolisten tcp
    ServerCmd=/usr/bin/X -br -novtswitch -quiet
    TerminateServer=true
    [X-:*-Greeter]
    AllowClose=false
    DefaultUser=sergio
    FocusPasswd=true
    LoginMode=DefaultLocal
    PreselectUser=Previous
    [X-:0-Core]
    AutoLoginEnable=true
    AutoLoginLocked=false
    AutoLoginUser=sergio
    ClientLogFile=.xsession-errors
    [Xdmcp]
    Enable=false
    Willing=/usr/share/config/kdm/Xwilling
    I wasn't able to find any relevant messages in Xorg.log.  Another piece of information that may be relevant: the framebuffer resolution is set to "vga=773" in GRUB (which, I think, automatically disables KMS).
    I'd rather be able to upgrade my nvidia driver in the future. Have anyone experienced the same problem? Is there any workaround it?
    Thank you very much.
    [Edit] I forgot: I am on i686, the monitor is an LCD widescreen and the nvidia card is an old one: FX 5200 [/Edit]
    Last edited by TioDuke (2010-02-23 15:22:46)

    Hey, I can confirm this, albeit with a different driver.
    I have upgraded nvidia drivers from 190.56 to 195.36 and I can't switch back into console once X is started. The boot output is printed correctly though.
    There is also another issue: If I don't set vga= in the boot options, my boot output hangs at "Waiting for udev uevents to be processed [busy]" (see: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=92189).
    .After a while X will start, even without vga= parameter.
    The problem definitely doesn't exist with 190.56...
    Maybe time for a bug report to NVIDIA?
    Problem also stayed even if I exchanged vesafb for uvesafb.
    Cheers
    Bastian

  • Nvidia 5200 with nvidia-173xx drivers crash

    I have an nvidia 5200 graphic card, using the nvidia-173xx driver, runed nvidia-xconfig (so it's a clean config), used kubuntu before, but ever since the new Xorg on arch my system crashes randomly, it crashed while running KDE & twm. Anyone got any clue ?

    I got the same GFX, but I use only openbox and it has yet to crash for me?
    Downgrade to the older xorg-server version, that should work for ya...
    Last edited by Dheart (2009-12-02 08:36:48)

  • Which NVIDIA graphics card for CS4 & CS5.5 Premiere?

    I just upgraded to CS5.5 Production Premium but I'm still using XP 32bit. That means I had to load the CS4 version of Premiere and After Effects. Sooner or later I'll upgrade to 64bit Win but in the mean time which graphics card will give me the best bang for the buck and still be useful for CS5.5 later? Money isn't an issue, I just don't want to pay for something and not benefit from it. What's worse is Adobe doesn't even list cards newer than the 8800 and Quadro FX for CS4! Weren't GTX cards available before CS5 came out? Do I need to update a file in CS4 apps to make them accept cards for GPU processing?
    Adobe and NVIDIA keep pushing the Quadro cards but when you look at the benchmarks it looks like the GTX cards do just as well. I will use the system for gaming sometimes so DX11 is a must. I have a watercooled i7 920 OC @ 4.0GHz and very stable, temps never go above 60C under full load. I have 6GB RAM and use a memory handler to access the RAM over what XP can use, and use it for virtual mem and caches etc. But my current graphics card is a slightly OC'd 9800GT w/512MB. My system doesn't like to scrub video that isn't rendered unless it's at lower resolutions and obviously I'd like rendering to be as fast as possible.
    Looking around I see:
    GTX560-TI @ $240
    GTX570 @ $300
    GTX480 @ $300
    GTX570 @ $300
    GTX580 @ $460
    Quadro 4000 @ $550
    Quadro 5000 @ $1200
    So what's the secret? Where's the sweet spot?
    TIA

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    JEShort01 wrote:
    The "secret" to MPE bliss is to get the video card AND Win7 64bit AND load your CS5.5. I really don't think that the video card would help much running CS4 on 32bit. Regarding which card, I'd say the sweet spot since you want to game and use CS5.5 would be to go with a GTX 480 with two or three fans (single fan reference design is too LOUD). Also, if you are not going to Win7 right away, delay your purchase and the next GEN of NVidia will be closer or out and you may either want one of the new smaller die-size cards or you could benefit form lower prices on what's available today.
    Jim
    So you're saying on Win32 and CS4 Pr, Ae, AME, the graphics card doesn't matter at all? That I won't see any improvement over my 512MB 9800GT?
    If I was to narrow it down even farther, the most important aspect would be in the "preview" performance. I can always render when I'm not using the system but sometimes the preview windows hang while working on a project. The problem worsens as the resolution increases or as the project gets more complicated. I had the same problem with PP1.5 which is why I decided to bite the bullet and upgrade to see if a newer version would help.
    Cooling isn't an issue as long as a water block is available for my next card. I've read the 570 & 580 may be the same reference layout and use the same coolers, I'm still looking into that. I know I can liquid cool the 480, 560TI, 580. I have no idea about the Quadro's, I've never seen a block for those.
    I'd like to go to Win64 but other software etc is keeping me from getting there soon. I'm looking into dual booting but have read about lots of problems with folder/file sharing issues when going from XP to Win7. I keep all files/projects on a seperate drive and some are shared over a network. If MS hasn't solved the sharing issues I'm forced to stick with XP. I have too many files that need read/write access and Win7 is stated to set all shares to read only. I'm still researching if it's been resolved.
    So it's important to know if anything will help CS4 because as stated above, it'll make more sence to wait for the next gen cards for use in CS5.5.
    The bottom line is, I built this system from the ground up just a few years ago before Win64 was so popular. I used the very best components (the 9800GT is actually the lowest componet I bought because gaming wasn't that important at the time). I'm running steady overclocked @ 4.0 and boot from an SSD drive. The data drives are 7200RPM and I bought the fastest RAM I could at the time. Obviously people were editing happily a few years ago on equipment inferior to mine. What's the catch? What am I missing to run smoothly on Win32? I'm assuming it's the graphics card because it's the only place I skimped. Maybe I have a software conflict keeping any version of Pr from working smoothly.
    Being 3 gens behind, and mediocre at that, I thought the card might be a good place to start.

  • Nvidia-173xx-173.14.17 on FX5200

    So... I did a system upgrade yesterday and when I restarted xorg, I ended up with command line. xorg.0.log gives me something like "Make sure there is a nvidia compatible GPU on this system". Ended up downgrading to 173.14.12. Anyone having the same problem. As the title says I'm using FX 5200.

    nvidia-173xx 173.14.17-2 and xorg-server 1.5.3-4 working okay here with a FX 5200 card.

  • [SOLVED]libgl and nvidia-173xx-utils conflicts

    sudo pacman -Syu
    :: Синхронизируются базы данных пакетов...
    core up to date
    extra up to date
    community up to date
    archlinuxfr up to date
    :: System full update...
    Dependencies...
    проверка на взаимную несовместимость...
    :: libgl и nvidia-173xx-utils conflicts. Delete nvidia-173xx-utils? [y/N] n
    error: обнаружен неразрешимый конфликт пакетов
    error: не удалось подготовить запрос (конфликтующие зависимости)
    :: libgl and nvidia-173xx-utils conflicts
    (Sorry, original log is on russian, but I translated main words)
    But!
    pacman -Rns libgl
    error: 'libgl': not found
    How to fix it?
    Last edited by Dr.X (2010-11-10 18:41:30)

    Solved the problem is very simple - removing the nouveau. I have it was because I was in one blog/forum read that no problem with containing both nvidia and nouveau, but that one of them will be in Blacklist. But he interrupted me to upgrade. But the strangest thing - when I last updated, they do not conflict, but now whoop.
    Thanks TigTex and wonder for your help!

  • NVIDIA Quadro 4000 for Mac H3314LL/A

    NVIDIA Quadro 4000 for Mac $1,199.95
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/H3314LL/A
    256 CUDA cores
    2GB of high-speed memory
    GPU accelerated professional applications DaVinci Resolve, Autodesk Smoke and Mathworks Matlab
    # Experience native Quadro professional 3D graphics performance when running Windows based applications using Boot Camp
    # Low-power, single-slot design allowing for up to two cards
    Install CD with graphics and CUDA drivers
    http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-quadro-4000-us.html

    Interesting; so as of today, the 5870 got a 'ADD NOW' and '1-click BUY' button. Just like the Quadro 4000, you can now actually order it.
    Availability has not changed from 'currently unavailable' however....
    Hatter, to my previous post; I realize that the Quadro will greatly accellerate certain tasks and apps; and for CUDA sensitive apps, it looks great.
    But I am worried about this being also a day to day card; playing WOW or other things after work is done.
    The raw SPEED of the Quadro is clearly much less than a GTX 285, or a 5770/5870:
    Quadro 4000:
    Memory Bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s
    Core Clock: 375 MHz
    Memory Clock: 700 MHz
    at a max W of 142 (power)
    GTX 285 (Mac version - which was slightly underpowered):
    Memory Bandwidth: 159 GB/s
    Core Clock: 648 MHz
    Memory Clock: 1242 MHz
    at a max W of 204 (power)
    5870:
    Memory Bandwidth: 153.6 GB/s
    Core Clock: 850 MHz
    Memory Clock: 1200 MHz
    at a max W of 188 (power)
    Based on these specs, applications which don't take advantage of the Quadro's specific accelleration should be markedly slower than with the consumer cards, wouldn't they?
    Best,
    Dan

  • I am unable to download Adobe Acrobat Standard from the cloud says the "Adobe Acrobat is not currently available for your language or platform." I am running Vista and using Chrome

    I just subscribed to Adobe Acrobat Standard from the cloud. I am running microsoft Vista and Google Chrome browser. I get the error message Adobe Acrobat is not currently available for your language or platform. For a list of supported platforms and languages: and I believe I meet the Vista requirements. How do I resolve this issue?

    LorettaKallen are you trying to install Adobe Acrobat Standard 11 utilizing the Adobe Application Manager?  Do you receive the same error message if you use Internet Explorer or Firefox?

  • Jsp,bc4j,Data web Bean , error : NO ROWS AVAILABLE FOR EDITING

    HI
    I'm developping a jsp application based on Bc4j. when trying to insert a new row with missing fields which must be not null,
    in order to be able to edit the row and correct the non seized fields, I display the edit page and it works for several views. but this time when editing fields and submitting the edit form an error is raised with the message no rows available for editing.
    the particularity for these views(which causes the error) is that are details for a view which is detail for an other.
    can someone please suggest some solution for such a problem
    thanks in advance
    Ghassen
    null

    ghassen
    this is a typicall error that occurs when trying to execute the Row data tag with action "Update" and there is not row obtained through the rowkeyparam (normally MyRowKey url parameter passed from the Edit page). I don4t have sufficient information to give you an exact solution.
    I don4t understand all your escenario, you spoke about "Insert new row with missing values in required fields", but if you don4t specify a right value to that fields, the insert fail.
    Then you display the Edit page to edit that just inserted row, to correct (specify?) the values of that fields. The error occurs in the EditSubmit page.
    The EditSubmit page execute de Row data tag, according to the implementation of Rowtag, first recover the row reference (from rowkeyparam url parameter) and then, if that row reference is null, throws the "No rows available for editing" Runtime Exception. This means that the datasource used in your EditSubmit page not include that RowKey reference (obtained from Edit page as Url parameter).
    HTH
    Pepe

  • New DSO data fields are not available for transformations in the upwardflow

    Hello,
    There are data flow from
        many source DSOs -> Target DSO -> Final DSO.
    Different transformations are defined and activated with DTPs. This works fine and provides the desired results.
    now new fields are added to the target DSO, final DSO and one of the source DSO.
    When I now try to edit the transformations, the new fields are not part of the sources at the different stage.
    The fields are available in the Data Source created out of a DSO but not directly when using a DSO as a data source.
    Have anyone faced such a problem?
    any solutions to this?
       - I cannot delete all the other transformations as this is too much work to do and there is no time for it.
    Regards
    Kannan

    We created ZMD_BS_MAT_OVP_LAYOUT. But the situation has not changed - the fields are not available for edit.

  • HT200183 If I wanted to include apple loops in the assets of Logic project folders that are part of a tutorial available for download on a paid educational website would that be ok?

    If I wanted to include apple loops in the assets of Logic project folders that are part of a song that follows a tutorial available for download on a paid educational website would that be ok? No one would be paying for the file itself that's part of the membership. I don't want to get into any copyright problems. I understand that they are royalty free and you can include them in your music no problem but the individual loops would be in the audio folder if I saved all the assets to the project file.
    Also, would it be ok to include screen shots I take myself of apple programs in my downloadable content?
    Just trying to figure out exactly how I should go about it to avoid any legal issues.

    Hi
    trainedmind wrote:
    No one would be paying for the file itself that's part of the membership. I don't want to get into any copyright problems.
    My gut reaction is that you may well run into © issues if you re-distribute the original AppleLoops.If your customers are paying for the training, they are also paying for the content you provide, so I feel that you would be re-selling the loops.
    Given that anyone who has a copy of Logic would likely have installed all the loop content, there should be no need to distribute them with the project files. Alternatively, make your own loops.
    CCT

Maybe you are looking for