OAS 4.0.8.1 on Solaris 2.7; Apps do not reload..

I am running OAS 4.0.8.1 on a Solaris 2.7 machine. The installation process went fine and OAS is running just fine. However, I cannot get any of my cartridges to run. I followed the instructions for the sample JServlet and added it via the OAS Manager. After reloading, I am simply unable to access anything within the virtual path that I configured. Can anyone help...?

I suggest you to try Hello world example first.
Installing Jservlet application and catridge is not a problem at all as long as you follow the procedure given.
I used JDeveloper to create a JServlet. You may go to 'sample code' section of the OTN to see the procedure to create JServlet.
set the virtual path / physical path correctly.
Sometime, it is necessary to reboot the system. System keeps some information in the buffer and keep giving old pages.
For example, we created a JServlet with a message 'Hello World'. It worked fine.
We changed the program to display 'Hello Jay World'. We continued to get only 'Hello World', not 'Hello Jay World'.
When my friend suggested me to reboot the machine, I did it with a little bit of hesitation. But, it worked.
I have installed 8i, OAS in one system and working in the same system.
null

Similar Messages

  • Solaris 10 install ZFS dependencies not satisfied in default group

    I'm installing solaris 10 (No I'm not allowed to upgrade to 11) on VMware and I'm trying to keep the installation small. I'm attempting to install the "Reduced Networking Group" but I get this error:
    "The default packages included in the selected metacluster do not satisfy the dependencies of the options you have selected. You must select "Custom" and resolve these dependencies. The following dependency has been created:
    1. ZFS(Usr) in "Zettabyte File System" depends on "The Python interpreter, libraries and utilities" in "GNOME Runtime".
    So I tried doing the Custom install and selecting that dependency, but it creates another 3 dependencies. Which in turn create 5 more dependencies etc.
    I tried searching google, but couldn't find any information about it. How do I get around this?

    That's the MBR label on the disk. That's easy to modify with fdisk.
    Inside the Solaris partition is another (VTOC) label. That one is harder to modify. It's what you see when you run 'format' -> 'print' -> 'partition' or 'prtvtoc'.
    To resize it, the only method I'm aware of is to record the slices somewhere, then destroy the label or run 'format -e' and create a new label for the autodetect device. Once you have the new label in place, you can recreate the old slices. All the data on the disk should be stable.
    Then you can make use of the space on the disk for new slices, for enlarging the last slice, or if you have a VM of some sort managing the disk.
    Darren

  • Downloaded corrupted OAS 4.0.8.2 for Solaris

    Any work around here, because I have downloaded a corrupted OAS 4.0.8.2(220MB or 231,006,489 bytes) and it took me a day on my office's ISDN modem.
    when I untar this file it just throw me an directory checksum error. Oracle Team please help me out.
    "tar xfv <filename>"
    thank you.
    kenneth

    Its a tically error of not enough memory.
    How many Mb of Ram and swap have you configured.
    Best regards, Marcelo.
    PD: With this combination I recomend 256Mb of ram plus 512mb of swap.

  • Use of MPSS on Solaris 9 and Java 141_03 - not getting 4M pagesizes

    Hi all,
    Anyone know how to get MPSS actually using large page sizes in 1.4 / SunOS 5.9 ??
    I have a 1.4.1_03-b02 JVM that is using the -XX:+UseMPSS option and using the LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/mpss.so.1 and MPSSHEAP=4M but when I use pmap -Fxs <PID> I always see 8k pages. My system is 5.9 Generic_122300-03 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-480R and pagesize -a give me:
    8192
    65536
    524288
    4194304
    so 4M should be OK to use...
    The full JVM options are:
    -XX:+TraceClassUnloading -XX:+UseParallelGC -XX:+UseMPSS -XX:-UseAdaptiveSizePolicy -XX:SurvivorRatio=2 -XX:MaxTenuringThreshold=3 -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -Dsun.rmi.server.exceptionTrace=true -Xloggc:gc.log -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps -XX:+PrintGCDetails -server -ms2560m -mx2560m -Xmn1024m -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=14400000 -Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=14400000
    I have also tried using LD_PRELOAD_32 and LD_PRELOAD_64 but still only see 8k pages in pmap for the heap...
    Thanks for any ideas, if I read the doc I should not need to do anything to use the MPSS option on SunOS 5.9...so maybe one of my other JVM options is preventing MPSS from being used?

    OK, bug 4845026 is giving me a clue:
    Bug ID:      4845026
    Votes      1
    Synopsis      MPSS broken on JDK 1.4.1_02
    Category      hotspot:jvm_interface
    Reported Against      1.4.1_02
    Release Fixed      
    State      Closed, will not be fixed
    Related Bugs      
    Submit Date      08-APR-2003
    Description      
    I am running SPECjAppServer2002 with WebLogic Server 8.1 and JDK 1.4.1_02.
    Here is the version of JDK 1.4.1_02 that I am using:
    <gar07.4> /export/VMs/j2sdk1.4.1_02/bin/java -version
    java version "1.4.1_02"
    Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1_02-b06)
    Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1_02-b06, mixed mode)
    The system is a V240 with solaris S9U3:
    <gar07.5> more /etc/release
    Solaris 9 4/03 s9s_u3wos_04 SPARC
    Copyright 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    Use is subject to license terms.
    Assembled 16 December 2002
    After rebooting the system I use the following command line to start the appserver:
    + /export/VMs/j2sdk1.4.1_02/bin/java -server -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps
    -XX:+UseMPSS -XX:+AggressiveHeap -Xms3500m -Xmx3500m -Xmn600m -Dweblogic.oci.sel
    ectBlobChunkSize=1600 -classpath ...
    The process should have some annon segments mapped to 4M, but it doesn't:
    <gar07.7> ps -ef | grep java
    ecuser 541 533 12 10:30:33 ? 0:50 /export/VMs/j2sdk1.4.1_02/bin/java -server -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps -
    ecuser 566 343 0 10:31:24 pts/1 0:00 grep java
    <gar07.8> pmap -s 541 | grep 4M
    <gar07.9>
    If I do exactly the same using JDK 1.4.2 instead of JDK1.4.1_02 I am able to get
    4M pages. Here is the command line for 1.4.2:
    + /export/VMs/j2sdk1.4.2/bin/java -server -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps -XX
    :+PrintGCDetails -XX:+AggressiveHeap -Xms3500m -Xmx3500m -Dweblogic.oci.selectBl
    obChunkSize=1600 -classpath ...
    And here are my 4M pages:
    <gar07.20> pmap -s `pgrep java` | grep 4M
    1AC00000 282624K 4M rwx-- [ anon ]
    F5800000 16384K 4M rwx-- [ anon ]
    F6800000 4096K 4M rwx-- [ anon ]
    F6C00000 4096K 4M rwx-- [ anon ]
    F7000000 4096K 4M rwx-- [ anon ]
    F9C00000 4096K 4M rwx-- [ anon ]
    Without large pages the time spent in TLB misses for this benchmark is 25% (!)
    Using 4M pages that time is reduce to 3%. WLS8.1 was certified with 1.4.1_02 so
    we cannot use 1.4.2 for the benchmark.
    thanks for your help,
    Fernando Castano
    Posted Date : 2006-04-27 23:04:32.0
    Work Around      
    N/A
    Evaluation      
    Mukesh,
    Can you get someone to look into back porting this fix. Please see below
    attachment for additional info. 4845026 : (P1/S1) New Hotbug Created
    Is a new bug that only exists in JDk 1.4.1_x release. Its fixed in 1.4.2
    release from code related to bug 4737603.
    Thanks Jane & James for the heads up.
    Thanks
    Gary Collins
    Gary,
    I think the bug James referred to is
    4737603 Using MPSS with Parallel Garbage Collection doesn't yield 4mb
    pages
    which was fixed in mantis (according to the bug report).
    Looks like a simple fix to back-port.
    Jane
    xxxxx@xxxxx 2003-04-10
    This problem is partially because of bug 4737603, mainly because there is code cache mapping to large page in 1.4.1(4772288: New MPSS in mantis). This part of code will be ported into 1.4.1 from mantis.
    xxxxx@xxxxx 2003-04-18
    There's 2 things. MPSS wasn't used in the parallel GC collector AND not
    used for the code cache. Both need to be addressed.
    xxxxx@xxxxx 2003-04-21

  • Solaris Management Console toolbox could not be loaded

    Hello,
    when I start SMC I get this error, toolbox http://ultra:989/toolboxes/smc.tbx could not be loaded. I only noticed this yesterday, and I think it is related to some patch that was applied recently. When I did wget http://ultra:898/toolboxes/smc.tbx I got these headers
    HTTP/1.0 200 OK
    Date: Thu, 27 Oct 02005 21:21:52 GMT
    Server: Tomcat/2.1
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Servlet-Engine: Tomcat/2.1 (Java 1.4.0_01; SunOS 5.9 sparc; java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.)
    Last-Modified: Tue, 31 Aug 02004 21:27:14 GMT
    and wget complains of
    Last-modified header invalid -- time-stamp ignored.
    perhaps it is this header that's invalidating the download and so SMC complains?
    This is solaris 9 on an ultra 5, fully patched (up to yesterday).
    Thanks for your help!

    I seem to have come across the same issue as well. On an Ultra 2, I'm running Solaris 10 1/06 (after an upgrade from Solaris 10 5/05). SMC 2.1 was working fine before I applied the latest Recommended Solaris 10 patch cluster. Now when starting smc, I get the message,
    "Server Not Running
    No Solaris Management Console server was available on the specified server. Please ensure there is a Solaris Management Console server available on the specified host and that it is running."
    with stop signs for all the management tools. I do not have patch 121309 installed which I suspect applies to the 6/06 release. In comparison to a working system, neither workstation had the entry for "smc 898/tcp" in its /etc/services file. I added it but did not make a difference so I removed the entry.
    "/etc/init.d/init.wbem stop/start" did not do the trick. Using dananderson's advice in,
    http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5057915
    I ended up having to completely remove and re-add all packages that had to do with smc using the Solaris 1/06 installation CD set. I confirmed smc was working again without the error. Update Manager suggested I add patches 121308-08 and 124188-02. Hesitantly, I added those two patches, rebooted and confirmed smc produced the error message again. I removed patches 121308-08 and 124188-02 and smc started working again. I will have to refrain from applying those patches so it continues to run.
    I wish I had further explanation as to why those updates are killing my smc.

  • Solaris 10 x86 JumpStart install not working

    I'm working with several Compaq DL380 servers.
    I've installed Solaris 10 x86 3/05 onto DL380 #1, and created a 3GB servername.flar Flash Archive of that system.
    I've moved that .flar file to a local web server. I can bring it up in any host's browser on the local subnet, and am able to download the .flar file.
    Now, on DL380 #2, I can install Solaris from CDs and open Mozilla and download the 3GB .flar file to /tmp. So, it is reachable. However, if I do a re-install, and this time specify a JumpStart install via HTTP, entering the URL that works, the install program tells me that it can't find a Flash Archive there. I'm entering the URL as http:/10.20.30.40/servername.flar, where 10.20.30.40 is the local web server. This is the same URL that works on other local hosts. (i.e. going to http:/10.20.30.40/ brings up the list of files, and a right-click on servername.flar gives you the option to download it, which I've tried and it does work - it takes a few hours, but it works)
    I tried HTTPS first and when I encountered this issue I reconfigured the web server for just HTTP. Then I thought the Flash archive must require a .flar filename extension (I had originally called it servername.archive) so I created a new Flash archive with a .flar extension - servername.flar.
    So, the same system, when installed from CDs, can access the web server and download the .flar file, but when re-installing and specifying the same URL it can't find it. I'm giving the DL380 #2 the same IP, same netmask, etc.. when doing the re-install.
    I can't think of anything else to try. Any ideas?
    thanks!

    Here is the error output:
    # ./add_install_client -i 192.168.1.51 -c sun1:/jumpstart/ -p sun1:/jumpstart/Sysidcfg/Solaris_10-intel/ host2 i86pc
    unmount: warning: /tftboot/I86PC.Solaris_10-1 not in mnttab
    unmount: /tftpboot/I86PC.Solaris_10-1 no such file or directory
    mount: Mount point /tftboot.I86PC.Solaris_10-1 does not exist.
    cleaning up preexisting install client "host2"
    removing host2 from bootparams
    rm: /tftboot/ is a directory
    updating /etc/bootparams
    ln: cannot create /tftpboot//pxegrub.I86PC.Solaris_10-1: File exists
    Create a grub boot flloppy and edit GRUB menu to contain
    the following entry:
    title Solaris netinstall
    rarp
    kernel /I86PC.Solaris_10-1/multiboot kernel/unix -B install_media=192.168.1.100:/jumpstart/OS/intel
    module /I86PC.Solaris_10-1/x86.miniroot
    ------------- end ---------------
    So, I have tried this with the -i, -e -i+-e, with -s and without.
    I have an entry in /etc/ethers and /etc/hosts. However, I don't think it is a FQDN or simular issue. Looks like a script issue.
    /tftpboot/ ends up with
    boot/
    nbp. -> pxegrub.I86PC.Solaris_10-1
    pxegrub.I86PC.Solaris_10-1
    rm.192.168.1.51
    /tftpboot/boot/
    grub/
    /tftpboot/boot/grub/
    menu.1st
    # cat menu.1st
    default 0
    timeout=30
    title Solaris_10 jumpstart
    kernel /i86PC.Solaris_10-1/multiboot kernel/unix -B install_config=192.168.1.100:/jumpstart,sysid_config=192.168.1.100:/jumpstart/Sysidcfg/Solaris_10-1-intel/,install_media=192.168.1.100:/jumpstart/OS/intel
    module /I86PC.Solaris_10-1/x86.miniroot
    ---- end ----
    Thanks for the help.
    Aaron

  • Solaris 10 x86 - SMC server not starting

    Same problem as here :
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/12180
    No solution yet ...
    SMC server doesn't start at boot, and won't start manually with /etc/init.d/init.wbem start
    starting it manually gives :
    # export VIPER_HOME=/usr/sadm/lib/smc
    # ./smcwbemserver -p 898 start
    Starting Solaris Management Console server version 2.1.0.
    endpoint created: :898
    Solaris Management Console server exiting: internal initialization failed: Initialization failed for service com.sun.management.viper.services.Authorization.
    Any idea?
    I have a basic Solaris 10 setup, with Entire Collection selected.
    My graphic card is not working so I had to install in text mode and access X remotely.

    I believe this is a fault in the crypto file that is mentioned in the Yahoo X86 posting, namely pkcs11_kernel.so. I have a possible workaround for this. Try looking at:
    http://www.webmin.com
    This is a free Web-based management tool that has most but not all of the functionality of the SMC. I tried downloading and installing the Solaris package from their download page, but this didn't work. What I eventually did was remove the package and download and install the generic Unix version, which was webmin-1.160.tar.gz as of when I downloaded it. The only gotchas to watch for are to run the setup.sh script and select Sun Solaris as the O/S, then select Solaris 9 as the version (they don't technically support 10 yet). I have been able to add users and groups and manage the disk without problems.
    Rich Lair

  • Solaris Container Manager console does not work

    I've loaded SMC 3.6 and loaded the container manager piece with no problems on a fresh Solaris 10 (11/06) install on a blade 1000. The managment center works just fine. I've loaded the container manager according to the following doc:
    http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-4098/6n699bc48?a=view
    The install went fine but when I point my browser to the page specified in the doc above the browser wants to download a bin file. I've restarted the java web server as shown in the above doc and I've scanned the port 6789 with nmap to make sure it was open. All browsers I've tried want to download a bin file. They are not launching a console as shown in the doc.
    I've tried firefox on linux, netscape on solaris and IE on windows. Java is loaded and working on all platforms. How do I get this working?

    use secure http
    https://<server name>:6789
    make sure you ran the setup for Solaris Container Manager

  • Solaris 10 u8 system did not update daylight savings time

    I am running Solaris 10 u8 x86, and my system did not update for the daylight savings time change on Nov. 1, 2009. I am in the US/Mountain time zone. What should I do?
    Patch 141517-04 is installed, I assume it came with u8.
    Does this have something to with JAVA Time Zone updater? I saw this:
    http://java.sun.com/javase/timezones/tzdata_versions.html
    Shouldn't u8 take care of all this automatically? Do I have to somehow get TZUT 1.3.20? By contacting support? What?
    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

    BTW, I'm running 64-bit Solaris as a VirtualBox (3.0.10) guest VM on a 32-bit WinXP host.

  • Solaris on Intel/apps for solaris compatibility

    Does anyone know how to run apps available for Sun solaris (sparc verion) to run on Intel solaris? I tried to install sybase client s/w on Intel solaris and obviously it bombed. Is there any kind of emulators or anything that would make this work?
    Thanks

    Well written code (e.g. avoiding hardware specifics, byte-order differences etc) is intended to be readily portable from Solaris on Intel to Solaris Sparc.
    The Forte tools from Sun are recommended, and a Try&Buy version can be had from the Sun download center. Sun also provides the Gnu tools on the companion CD shipped with Solaris media kits or at sunfreeware.com
    Have Fun!

  • Solaris 10 x86 (gold) will not install - Cannot start X-Server

    (Originally posted in the wrong forum. Oops)
    Okay,. this is really stupid. I don't understand this one at all.
    I cannot install Solaris x86 (gold - as in "non-beta") at all. I have tried both the ATI Rage 128 Pro and NVidia GeForce chipsets. Both cards are correctly detected; however, regardless of what selection or driver option I choose, the installation crashes immediately thereafter.
    If I let the installation go on its own, it stops completely at the "Detecting additional network parameters" or whatever that particular error message is.
    If I manually select the standard (non XF86) drivers of the card, black-on-yellow text complains about how it cannot detect the card (that it correctly identified) and that it cannot start the X server. It then improperly displays the text menu for language selection and stops.
    If I manually select the XF86 drivers, it gets all of the way through to where I test the video mode and then just dies. No error message or anything.
    {rant mode on}
    Jesus, Sun! What the hell is going on? These are two INDUSTRY STANDARD video cards! These aren't some run-of-the-mill, no-name chipsets we're talking about! It's exactly because of idiotic driver issues like this that people laugh when given the choice between Solaris and Linux while looking for Windows alternatives for the desktop!
    {rant mode off}
    Sorry for the rant, but I've been complaining for years that issues like this are exactly why Windows has been allowed to dominate the desktop. Now here comes Linux which supports just about everything, and Sun still apparently has no clue about supporting desktops. I know , I know-- servers are Sun's strengths, but if Sun is going to try to get JDS onto the desktop, this is not the way to go about it.
    Now that I've gotten that off my chest (I really needed that), does anyone know what needs to be done to get this to install properly and of course function properly thereafter without having to jump througha ton of hoops?

    That's just what really bothers me about this!
    Last week, I installed from the very same CDs onto an old Celeron 633 w/ 128 MB and ATI Rage video chipset just for giggles. Everything went beautifully except for the network. (Once again, Sun shows its pathetic weakness on drivers thus giving Linux a major edge.) The only video error that I got was remedied by switching to the standard driver from the XF86 driver. It ran like a champ afterwards except that it got confused on the network card and therefore prevented network connectivity.
    So, this time I tried to install it on a Pentium 4 1.8 GHz w/ 512 MB RAM, and it's puking on me with same video chipset family (ATI Rage) as well as NVidia chipsets! Absolutely ridiculous!

  • Solaris 10 8/07 will not install

    I cannot get Solaris 10 8/07 to install from a DVD .iso image. I have an x86 platform with 2.66 GHz Celeron Processor and 256MB RAM and 60 GB HD so I believe the hardware is adequate. In my first attempt at installation I had Windows XP and openSUSE 10.3 both successfully on my HD, and was operating in openSUSE 10.3. I used the "cat" shell terminal command, to glue all five pieces (two OS parts, companion iso, and md5 lists) and then burned to DVD using the openSUSE "k3b" DVD burner app. It was unsuccessful. What came up when booting from this newly created DVD .iso image was very slowly (too slowly it seems) occuring dots like about this many > ". . . . . . . . . . . . . . .", and then three boot options. I choose the default "Solaris" option. Then what came on the screen was "Copyright 1983-2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Use is subject to license terms", and then "Configuring devices", with a cursor blinking forever and hanging, on the next line. That's as far as it goes in booting up. It hangs forever at this point. Everything was super slow in getting to the "Configuring devices" part as well.
    Then, I tried just the essential files OS itself parts a & b, used "cat" to glue them together, and the exact same occurance as above happened.
    Then, I decided to wipe the my entire hardrive with "DBAN" (a harddrive eraser), do a fresh install of Windows XP, and so go the WINDOWS x86 option route...had to first install ".net 3.0" and then "CD burner XP", (for CD burner XP to work you now need .net for Win XP OS)...and after all the downloading and decompression time for the WINDOWS x86 Solaris OS .exe file, that did correctly expand to a single .iso file, still, the same exact results as the very first DVD .iso burn.
    Then thought, okay maybe my PC x86 hardware is not powerful enough and so ran Sun Device Detection Tool, and it detected all the drivers on my system except for 56K modem and a warning about vga text, so that's okay. I don't use 56K, and could see the text abuot "Configuring devices", so I believe this is not the problem at this stage.
    Does anyone have any idea what the problem is? Do I need some kind of Solaris 10 8/07 patch to then build a new .iso build?
    I'm at a complete loss, and now quite frustrated.

    I also had that exact same issue on a "HP Presario 2.2Ghz Celeron with 1Ghz ram".
    It hangs on the blinking cursor. I am a techie, so I downloaded and burned more dvds in different ways. They all respond the same in that computer (so it shouldn't be a media problem), HOWEVER, on ONE machine (P3 1.0ghz 512MB 60GB) I have gotten the installation to proceed all the way to...
    [solaris install console text reads]
    Checking rules.ok file...
    Using begin script: install_begin
    Using finish script: patch_finish
    Executing SolStart preinstall phase...
    Executing begin script "install_begin"...
    Begin script install_begin execution completed.
    Starting Solaris Installation...
    [end]
    It is past the partition creation point, and should be installing the software.
    I installed a fresh hard drive in to do some playing, and it did not create any partition information even though it is past that point.
    I think it may be a problem with the x86 installation program set. But I have no SPARC hardware in which to test.
    I would love to evaluate sol10 if anybody can find a workaround.
    Please advise :-)

  • Solaris 10 - Installation - Networked Option not display- RTL 8139 NIC Card

    Hi,
    when i installing Solaris, the Networkd (Yes/No) option not display. In my PC (x86) RTL 8139 Networkd Card is installed. Please advice, how can i enable Networked option and docs says that Solaris-10 Supports RTL 8139 Network card. (Ref: http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/self_help.jsp#installing )
    Here pls refer "Network Devices (x86)" Section ).
    Thanks

    I'm not quite sureee, but you might want to run the SDDT test scripts...
    http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/device_detect.jsp
    This you can run from Windows, Linux on the same box, and it will list all the drivers for the hardware that solaris knows about. Inside the tool you can select, whether you want that list for Solaris 10 or SXDE...
    Matthias
    P.S.: I assume, the driver should be e1000g, but am not quite sure...

  • Accessing solaris box while its down/not connected to network

    How Unix SA access this server when its down and not accessable on network? there is solaris server having problem, may need to reboot, but unable to access it....any idea what logs i should check etc also help....

    Hi.
    Docs about this server.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19088-01/v120.srvr/index.html
    This server have System Controller (LOM) , that can have access via serial port ( SER MGMT) and Network ( NET MGMT)
    More information - User's Guide:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19088-01/v120.srvr/816-2090-10/816-2090-10.pdf
    From page 101.
    After connectiong to LOM you can:
    1. Check status: environment
    2. Connect to server's console: console
    3. Manage Power: poweron ; poweroff
    4. Check some logs: loghistory ; show eventlog
    Regards.

  • Using solaris 11 x86 I do not get usb audio in firefox or additions where can I redirect the internal audio to usb audio? Audio works through solaris

    I upgraded to Solaris 11 x86 and Firefox 3.6.10. I have sound through Solaris but not through Firefox or any of the add-ons.
    I am using USB speakers which work with Solaris Rythmbox. How can I redirect Firefox audio to my USB speakers?

    It works fine, thank you. There is one glitch when I turn off my system and on the next day the audio is missing again. Applying the dsp to dsp 0 reboot and then back to dsp1 reboot I get the audio back.
    Is there any way to restart the process?

Maybe you are looking for