Objects for RSRV Check Post Upgrade

Hi,
Could be a Trivial Question for some - Nevertheless.....
What would be an Exhaustive list of various types of Objects to be tested for Consistency using RSRV post Upgrade ?
Please throw some "Expert" Light ...
Regards
Shweta

In our case we apply upgrades to Sand Box.
We created few reports and prepared test script before and after upgrade.
We prepared our own document.
But this is what the guideline we did.
Regards,
Bashir Awan

Similar Messages

Reason for Inactive Infoset Post Upgrade

Hi,
As a part of Upgrade testing, I have observed this in all the systems that Infosets turn Inactive Post Upgrade. And i realise this only when i Execute a Query on an Infoset; it gives me a warning that I need to activate the underlying Infoset.
I am keen on finding the root of this error so that we can take care of these in the systems that have to be upgraded in future.
Any Pointers ?
Regards
Shweta

Hi,
it might be necessary to activate all existing InfoSets and MultiProviders based on them after upgrading to NetWeaver 2004s.
Reason:
Infosets are sometimes deactivated because additional checks are available after the upgrade or because new attributes become part of your info-object.
Also,an object can be inactive after upgrade even if the objct contained any custom objects in it. You may have to activate it or run RSRV check.
If there is any change(custom object etc) in InfoSet, it is automatically inactivated and you have to reactivate it.
To activate all such InfoProviders there are programs in SE38 like RSDG_CUBE_ACTIVATE,RSDG_MPRO_ACTIVATE,RSDG_ODSO_ACTIVATE
Hope this explaination helps!

Authorization objects for EA-PS after upgrade

Hi,
We are upgrading from ERP 4.6c to ECC 6.0 (IS-PS 462 to EA-PS 6.00).
On preliminary tests we have found that we need to add a few authorization objects to the users, but we want to minimize that.
We opted to deactivate BAdi implementation "FMBS_ADDON_AUTH_FI" and to mark the two checks inside IMG "Activate Old Authorization Check"
Although we have found authorization issues with objects:
F_FICA_FTR and
F_FICA_FCD
Is there a list of Objects that we need to add to the roles that I can review? or maybe an OSS Note or SDN article about this?
Best regards,
Nelson

Hi, I have been studying this, and I have found that the error message I saw yesterday definitely speaks to the problem I have been having.
I created a test role with one transaction, then went into SU24 for that transaction and made a new auth check with display 03. After I updated that role in PFCG (maintaining the new authorization), I went back to SU24, changed that new auth check by removing 03.
When I went back into the role in expert mode, the maintained authorization was gone and replaced with a new standard authorization with no values.
My concern is that wherever the authorization checks are coming from, their construction is corrupt! I'm not even sure that the original auth checks are OK -- if they had values that were later taken out, I am concerned that they will cause this error I am seeing.
I'm getting ready to upload the auth check tables from QA back to the Sandbox, but I'm not sure that will solve the problem if there is another cause for this. Is there some other setting/selection that someone must have clicked on that is now causing this problem? I still don't have a clear answer on that, and I would love to know.
Thanks,
Ed

Authorisation Object for Journal Voucher posting into WBS Proj Types

Dear All,
I would like to restrict my users to posting into certain WBS projects Types through the t-code F-02.
I was wondering which authorisation object is able to do this as I tried C_PRPS_ART and it does not work.
Thanks
Adrian

Dear:
           Check against which activity you have assigned this object . Take BASIS Help,
           If you execute F-02 in SU24 you can find authorization objects that can be used in it.
            Regards

BW upgrade - pre and post upgrade reports

Hi All
Quick question please.
We plan to upgrade our BW ABAP system from NW 731 SPS7 to NW 740 SPS6.
I read the ASU toolbox note 1000009 and can see that there is no file for our scenario i..e from 73X to 740 so note 1734333 is the way to go here when prompted for ASU toolbox run. However within the note 1734333, it states "This note requires that all pre-requisites for the BW-related system copy automation are met according to note 1707321". When i read 1707321 it talks about installation procedure for PCA which is part of LVM, a licensed software. We don't have this license. Hence I am wondering if note 1707321 is applicable for us at all or is it that this note would bring about changes in the system and sets up a staging area upon which the Z report from the other note(1734333) builds and then creates task list for pre and post upgrade. I am certain that we will have to implement Z report from note 1734333 however the reference to note 1707321 has created some confusion.
Also once we implement the Z report from 1734333, the note says, the report needs not be transferred but the objects generated need to be. Would the author here referring to reports - SAP_BW_BEFORE UPGRADE and SAP_BW_AFTER UPGRADE and having them recorded into a transport. Any thoughts here please. If the author is indeed referring to these reports only, how do we know this will show up in quality systems via STC01 as input options.
Regards
Kalyan

I re-read the note again, It says, If task manager content notes(1707321) are not applied, we will not see reports for stopping RDA Daemons and Process chains i...e report RS_SYSTEM_SHUTDOWN. However we are on NW 731 SP7 so we already have this report. This means we can go ahead with implementing the Z report from 1734333 and forget about the other note. Have I comprehended it correctly
Regards
Kalyan

BW Upgrade from 3.5 to version 7 - RSRV check fails in conversion exists

Hi All,
We are in the process of doing preupgrade checks for version 3.5 and for infoobject 0MATL_GROUP (material group) RSRV checks fails and throughing conversion exit issue for some SID's ,
Error Message:
Check values of characteristic 0MATL_GROUP for conversion exit
There are 41 values with the wrong internal format in the SID table
The first 10 errors are:
Value in SID table 4350/ correct value 000004350/ SID in SID table 2732
Value in SID table 10000000/ correct value 010000000/ SID in SID table 2716
Value in SID table 12000000/ correct value 012000000/ SID in SID table 2717
etc...
I just want to check do we need to fix this error before doing the actual basis upgrade 7.0 tasks orelse is it OK to do upgrade without fixing this error .
Pls advice is there is any way to fix this issue in system without deleting the above SID's in the system.
Is this error will create major issues afterupgrade to 7 without fixing this SID issues in 3.5 - Pls adivce us.
With regards,
Hari

Hi Hari,
From the error message it seems that you had data loaded to 0MATL_GROUP before the EXIT (I guess it is an ALPHA exit)
was switched on. Now the system find values that are not ALPHA converted with the RSRV check. You should correct this
problem before doing the upgrade. It should be possible to do the ALPHA conversion using the transaction RSMDCNVEXIT.
The reason for doing the ALPHA conversion before the upgrade is that transaction RSMDCNVEXIT is no longer available in BI
7.0, Since some objects of the new data flow in BI 7.0 ( for example BIA) are not covered by RSMDCNVEXIT it has been set to obsolete.
Customers cannot use transaction RSMDCNVEXIT anymore in release BI 7.0.
Best Regards,
Des.

Post-upgrade tasks for OWB 10g Release 2

Hi,
we're planning to upgrade from OWB 10.1.0.2 to 10.2.x.
Now, I'm trying to get a clear view on what will be the "post-upgrade" tasks, in terms of manual adaptations, corrections, etc. to get everything back up and running after the upgrade ...
E.g. : by means of test al already exported a dimension, and imported it in the 10.2 repository ... Turned out that in the pre-10.2 version, there were no validation problems, but as from 10.2 (although the upgrade and import were successful), I got 19 warnings and 2 errors ... because each level needs to have a business or surrogate key ...
It' s things like that I'm especially interested in, in order to determine the workload after the upgrade ...
So, feel free to share your experiences ; I'm looking forward to read them!
Thanks!
Grtz.

Here are some from my list. I stopped maintaining it a while ago, we have lots more where this came from. Some of it also apply to older versions of OWB.
Key lookup     You are to choose input and output attributes BEFORE being able to choose loookup table, all in a time consuming wizard
Expressions     Copy and paste into expression editor, validation fails for expressions using lowercase (such as "upper" or "substr")
Renaming attributes     Not possible anymore, you need to open details
Adding a table component     You must browse in a tree structure (time consuming), not search functionality anymore
Import     Import converting from 9.2 hangs after 15% in about 10% of all imports
Import     Some mappings are not possible to import, a total rewrite is necessary
Deployment     You can only deploy about 5-10 times before you need to restart OWB
Memory leak     If something goes wrong in OWB, memory is never cleared - JAWAW.exe needs to be removed manually from memory
Import     Importing mappings one by one (as this is sometimes needed due to OWB), the last directory used is OF COURSE not default when importing the next time
OWB GUI / mapping editor     When working with components in the mapping editor, an object hidden behind the object you are actually working with is selected prior to the object in visual focus to the user
BUG!     Urgent: CASE - wrong generated Code
ANSI JOINS     Remove ANSI-SQL from mapping configuration, otherwise (+) outer joins will not work
Transformations     Not possible to enter a transformation such as "sysdate", you must find it in a huge tree structure list (no search available)

Post upgrade step for EP

HI Friends,
I have upgraded my EP from 6.0 to 7.0 successful with all component. ALos i am getting login screen. SO what are post upgrade step for EP.
Thanks,
Regards,
Sachin

HI ,
System restart
run the SICK verify the installation check
Check developer traces on the operating system. Log on to
Check the installed license and profile configuration (RZ10 and PFCG)
confirm the operation modes
Perform a client copy
Check the status of the SAP Web AS Java and the user SAPJSF
Check the rdisp/j2ee_start profile parameter
Check the current state of SAP Web AS Java using transaction SMICM
SAP Load Generator
Start SAP Load Generator (SGEN)
Regards,

Query running for long post upgrade to Oracle 11g from 10g

The below query is running for a very long time post upgrade of database from 10g to 11g.
SELECT default_supplier
FROM (SELECT pv.vendor_name || '-'
               || pvsa.vendor_site_code default_supplier
          FROM mrp_item_sourcing_levels_v mislv,
               mfg_lookups ml1,
               mfg_lookups ml2,
               mfg_lookups ml3,
               mtl_system_items_b msib,
               po_vendors pv,
               po_vendor_sites_all pvsa
         WHERE msib.segment1 = :b1
           AND msib.organization_id = :b2
           AND mislv.inventory_item_id = msib.inventory_item_id
           AND mislv.organization_id = msib.organization_id
           AND ml1.lookup_type = 'MRP_SOURCING_RULE_TYPE'
           AND ml1.lookup_code = mislv.sourcing_rule_type
           AND ml2.lookup_type = 'MRP_ASSIGNMENT_TYPE'
           AND ml2.lookup_code = mislv.assignment_type
           AND pv.vendor_id = mislv.vendor_id
           AND pvsa.vendor_site_id = mislv.vendor_site_id
           AND pvsa.vendor_id = mislv.vendor_id
           AND ml3.lookup_type = 'MRP_SOURCE_TYPE'
           AND ml3.lookup_code = mislv.sourcing_level
           AND mislv.sourcing_level =
                  (SELECT MIN (sourcing_level)
                     FROM mrp_item_sourcing_levels_v
                    WHERE inventory_item_id = msib.inventory_item_id
                      AND organization_id = msib.organization_id)
        UNION
        SELECT ood.organization_code default_supplier
          FROM mrp_item_sourcing_levels_v mislv,
               mfg_lookups ml1,
               mfg_lookups ml2,
               mfg_lookups ml3,
               mtl_system_items_b msib,
               org_organization_definitions ood
         WHERE msib.segment1 = :b1
           AND msib.organization_id = :b2
           AND mislv.inventory_item_id = msib.inventory_item_id
           AND mislv.organization_id = msib.organization_id
           AND ml1.lookup_type = 'MRP_SOURCING_RULE_TYPE'
           AND ml1.lookup_code = mislv.sourcing_rule_type
           AND ml2.lookup_type = 'MRP_ASSIGNMENT_TYPE'
           AND ml2.lookup_code = mislv.assignment_type
           AND ml3.lookup_type = 'MRP_SOURCE_TYPE'
           AND ml3.lookup_code = mislv.sourcing_level
           AND ood.organization_id = mislv.source_organization_id
           AND mislv.sourcing_level =
                  (SELECT MIN (sourcing_level)
                     FROM mrp_item_sourcing_levels_v
                    WHERE inventory_item_id = msib.inventory_item_id
                      AND organization_id = msib.organization_id))
From the trace files, we see that the issue is with the seeded view, mrp_item_sourcing_levels_v.
Need pointers for fixing the performance.

The ETRM says this about the view:
***** Warning: Oracle Internal Use Only *****
Oracle Corporation does not support access to Oracle
applications data using this object, except from standard Oracle Applications programs.
which is a powerful suggestion that you should not be addressing this view directly. Looking at the source code for the view, it has a bunch of UNIONs that may prevent view merging, and all the queries have loads of hints coded within them. So really, there is little you can do about this.
It looks pretty simple to re-write your query to avoid addressing this view, you are using it only to retrieve a couple of columns. If you look at the source code for the view you'll see that you can get them easily without going through the view.
John Watson
Oracle Certified Master DBA

Post upgrade check list

Hi,
We have a sandbox upgraded from XI 3.0 to PI 7.0.
Is there any check list to see if every thing is ok or not
thanks,

Hi Naveen,
I think there is no such check list for post upgradation, but you can check these SAP artifacts which talks about the same:
<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b6974f99-0701-0010-9591-adf867dca09b">https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b6974f99-0701-0010-9591-adf867dca09b</a>
<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/cefe0399-0701-0010-8d86-b6b31cc5a681">SAP Exchange Infrastructure in High Availability Environments</a>
<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8c72aca0-0501-0010-3d9e-e16fdb86fd15">Upgrade Master Guide 04</a>
<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a1a0eb43-0b01-0010-23aa-908cc4eaabcd">Upgrade Master Guide 04s</a>
Also check these two similar threads:
Upgrade check list
Regards,
Subhasha Ranjan

All day calendar events not being displayed in the notification centre for iphone 5 post ios 7 upgrade. Please help. Is it a bug?

All day calendar events not being displayed in the notification centre for iphone 5 post ios 7 upgrade. Please help. Is it a bug?
With iOS 6, the all day events showed up in the notification centre but it lacks in the upgrade iOS 7.

Same problem here. Some people pointed out that all-day events do show up in their notification center, but that seems only to be the case for birthdays (and only as text like the weather). I've tried it myself on my iPhone and iPad and it did work for birthdays but not for any other all-day events. I already sent this to Apple as a product feedback as well, as should everyone of you. The more people mention it, the faster Apple's going to fix this issue. In its current state, notification center is not a very helpful feature in my opinion. There's absolutely no point in not showing all-day events in the 'today' calendar overview.
Here's a link to the product feedback page: http://www.apple.com/feedback/
I posted my message in the iPhone section since I couldn't find a page specifically dedicated to iOS 7.
I really love the look & feel of iOS 7 but it's kinda sad to see notification center not tapping its full potential.
Cheers!

Configuring double invoice check for vendor invoices posted through FB60

Dear all
Can anyone tell me how to configure double invoice check for vendor invoices posted through FB60.
for miro documents..we can use Tcode OMRDC
Is there any such tcode which can be used for configuring fi invoices for double checking..
regards
Expertia

Dear Expertia,
In FI,when checking for duplicated invoices, the system compares the
following :Vendor, currency, company code, gross amount of the invoice,
reference document number and Invoice document date.
SAP Note 305201 clarifies this in a more details; please read it.
The following fields must be identical for Duplicate invoice check
     Company code                              (BUKRS)
     Vendor number                             (LIFNR)
     Currency                                  (WAERS)
     Reference number                          (XBLNR)
     Amount in document currency               (WRBTR)
     Document date                             (BLDAT)
If the document is having any one of the above filed different then the
system does not consider it as a duplicate invoice.
Also It will check duplicate invoice check in vendor master data and
in posting key is there check box selected for sales related
The setting you making in OMRDC i.e Materials management->Logistics
Invoice Verification->Incoming Invoice ->Set Check for Duplicate
Invoices is only valid for MM and not FI invoices posted via FB60/FB65
You should check the F1 help on field "Chk double inv." (LFB1-REPRF)
in the relevant vendor master record (transaction FK03).
Please also check, that message F5 117 has been set correctly in the
IMG using this path:
Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings ->
Document -> Default Values for Document Processing -> Change Message
Control for Document Control For Document Processing
Finally & mainly, go to the relevant posting key is defined as sales
related in transaction OB41. You have to flag this field if the
duplicate invoice check should work.
I hope this helps You.
mauri

Cost object for raw material consumption posting

the raw material cosumption posting is done in the background when the goods issue is done. so where do we assign cost object for the primary cost element of raw material consumption account. since we create primary cost element for raw material consumption account, it will expect us to give cost object, so where we assign cost object for the raw material consumption cost element

hi
since the raw material cost is relevent for cost accounting u need to maintain primary cost elment accounts.When ever u confirm goods, the rm issue will take place automatically and will be debited to either product cost collector or production order. so u need not to assign any cost object for these consumption accounts why bcoz issues will take palce aganist a production order or product cost collector which is a cost object .
regards
siva

Authority-Check Object for PLANT(WERKS)?

Hi Experts,
By using "V_VBAK_VKO" Authority Object am checking the user Authentication against the sales area(Sales OrgDistr. ChannelDivision) in my custom report. Below is the code,
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'V_VBAK_VKO'
    ID 'VKORG' FIELD s_vkorg
    ID 'VTWEG' FIELD s_vtweg
    ID 'SPART' FIELD s_spart
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '01'
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'.
(Note: My report is for SD/OTC module)
I also need to check the authenmtication of user against entered PLANT (WERKS) in selection screen, so, pls. let me know that What is the Authority-Check Object for PLANT(WERKS)
Thank you

Hi,
Transaction SU20, search for WERKS.
When you find it, double click on the row, in the bottom half of the resulting screen there is a list of authorisation objects that contain the field.
Unfortunately, you can't navigate from this list into the definition of the objects, so you'll need to cross-reference against transaction SU21.
Regards,
Nick

RSSM: Checks Authorization Objects for Infoprovider are not activ

Hello,
we have BW 3.5 and we use RSSM Authorization Objects.
When we create a new cube with an Infoobject that is authorization relevant, in our development-system in rssm the flags for the checks are automatically activ.
When we transport the new cube to our production-system, the flags in RSSM for the authorization object are not activ.
Sometimes the new infoprovider is not in the list of the infoprovider in rssm, so we have to "update check status" with the appropriate icon.
My question:
It is possible, that when we import the new cube in our production-system, that all authorization objects are activ??

Hi,
Normally system would check all the authorization relevant objects whenever a new Info cube is imported and in case if you want to transport these changes to Production system manually then follow the below listed steps:
1) In Development system, check or un-check the authorization relevancy using the transaction RSSM on a given Info provider
2) These changes are stored in table RSSTOBJDIR
3) Create a manuall transport request and include these entries covering the required Authorization objects manually.
R3TR TABU RSSTOBJDIR
Ex: If Info object 'A' is authorization relevant in Development system but not in Production system and you want to transport this change to Production system then include object 'A' table entries manually.
Hope this helps.
Cheers
Bala Koppuravuri

Objects for RSRV Check Post Upgrade

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for