Ocr not consistent for me

Hi All,
I have an OCR challenge.
i'm reading txt that is back lit and from unit to unit there is small variation between the images. Unfortunately the txt does not appear very different from the backlit areas around it. i've tried shutting off the backlighting but that doesn't give me very different results. Does anyone have any tricks for when the text is not much brighter than the background around it? any help would be appreciated. Here are two images i'm working with.

Why is there so little contrast? Are they different colors but about the same intensity? You might need to use a color camera to get the contrast you need. Adding a color filter might do the job as well.
If you are just reading the numeric values, you might want to try the LCD/LED 7 segment display reader instead of OCR.
Bruce
Bruce Ammons
Ammons Engineering

Similar Messages

CIF of SA is not consistent for Validity End Date

Hello gurus,
Our company is quite new in using SNC, and we bumped into this problem (see description below), and hopefully this forum can help us.
<Description>:
When the Scheduling Agreement is CIFed from R/3 (ECC) to SNC, the Validity End Date does not get updated each time.
It gets updated sometimes, but not always. It is inconsistent behaviour.
<Example>:
Scheduling Agreement A
Validity End Date: 31.12.2012 Changed to 30.11.2012 in R/3.
Performed CIF using Transaction Codes CFM1 and CFM2.
Correctly updated the Validity End Date in SNC.
For the same Scheduling Agreement A updated Validity End Date to 31.01.2013 in R/3.
Performed CIF using Transaction Codes CFM1 and CFM2.
The Validity End Date was not updated in SNC & remained as 30.11.2012.
For the same Scheduling Agreement A updated Validity End Date to 15.10.2012 in R/3.
Performed CIF using Transaction Codes CFM1 and CFM2.
The Validity End Date was not updated in SNC & remained as 30.11.2012.
Thanks guys
Tuffy

Hi Tuffy,
1 - I am just wondering if after the Delete the existing External Procurement Relationship in SNC, and CFM1 and CFM2 the SA (i.e. changed my validity end date value) to the SNC, will the problem of the SNC side not able receive the changed SA??
When there is a change in the SA, integration model would create the same in SNC if it does not exist. But the transfer from ERP does not happen just like that. First, make sure that the message type (CIFSRC) has been checked in BD50 and then schedule a job to periodically transfer the SAs.
2 - What does the tcode the person in the SNC side have to double check to ensure the SA is transmitted there??
The t-code is /SAPAPO/MTI2 - External Procurement Relationship.
3 - Someone in our company advise BASIS team to check the transactions BD50 and BD52. What exactly does it mean and does it help?
This is correct. I mean guys who are responsible for Integration model need to set-up BD50, BD52 so that changes to SAs are transferred periodically.
Regards,
Sandeep

ESS Travel Assistant (WD ABAP): My Employees not consistent for users

Hi there,
I've seen a couple threads with the same issue on here - but, no resolution is posted... We are trying to use the My Employees service in ESS Travel (travel assistant functions). It appears there are two options for defining the list of employees that the travel assistant can use: 1.) User can build their own list (which is what I can do with my own user ID) and 2.) the list is predefined based on config settings. I have three other user IDs that do not have the option to maintain their own list. My Id has the Add/Remove Employee buttons. The other IDs only have a u2018Personalizationu2019 button. When this is selected, I can add employees, but it never adds them to the employee list. We have not done any configuration to determine the list, so I am not sure why there are differences by user!
This does not appear to be a Security issue. I added SAP_ALL to the troublesome user IDs and they still did not have the Add/Remove buttons. Any help/info would be greatly appreciated. Stumped...
Thanks,
Karen G.

General Information About the Application and Component
Application: FITV_POWL_ASSISTANT
Web Dynpro Component: WDR_F4_ELEMENTARY
Window Information: W_SETTINGS
View Information: V_SETTINGS
Configuration ID: PREMN
FPB_MAINTAIN_PERS_M in order to centrally assign employee numbers to
your assistants.

Color not consistent for Line Chart and Legend for prev and curryr

Hi
I am trying to pull last year and current year data in line chart with different color coding. I have multiple parameters selection on single chart. For some it reflects the color properly and for others it interchanges the color.
Crystal xI R2..
Please let me know the solution.
Thanks

Please re-post if this is still an issue or purchase a case and have a dedicated support engineer work with you directly:
http://store.businessobjects.com/store/bobjamer/DisplayProductByTypePage&parentCategoryID=&categoryID=11522300?resid=-Z5tUwoHAiwAAA8@NLgAAAAS&rests=1254701640551

My iphone 4s voice dictation for text messages is not consistently working. Sometimes it works, other times after the dictation it just gives me a blank space. Anyone else having this problem?

My iphone 4s voice dictiation for text messages is not consistently working. I've had the phone since Thanksgiving and it always worked perfectly, but the last few weeks it's been hit or miss. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Anyone else having this problem? I tried the hard reset but that hasn't fixed it.

I have the same problem since updating to IOS 8.3. Any app to which I want to send a new link via IMessage does not allow me to select a contact to send the IMessage to. Using a pre-existing thread does not have same problem.

EXP-00105: parameter CONSISTENT is not supported for this user

Hi,
I have use Oracle 10g on unix platform
i have export is taken from following command
exp \'/ as sysdba\' file=t.dmp full=y buffer=10485760 log=0101.log CONSISTENT=y statistics=none
export is sucessfull but one warning
EXP-00105: parameter CONSISTENT is not supported for this user
if i have use without CONSISTENT parameter then export is successfull ,
why EXP-00105 error occured ?

As per Oracle Error Notes:
EXP-00105: parameter string is not supported for this user
Cause: The user attempted to specify either CONSISTENT or OBJECT_CONSISTENT when connected as sysdba.
Action: If a consistent export is needed, then connect as another user.
Looks likE the SYS user cannot do a transaction level consistent read (read-only transaction). You could have performed this by SYSTEM user or any DBA priviliged user to to take the complete export of your DB.
Anyway, for more information the error "EXP-00105", please take a look into the same question on another Oracle related forums.
http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/05-2006/msg00236.html
Regards,
Sabdar Syed.

[svn:osmf:] 13003: Update some unit tests to reflect that LayoutContextSprite now returns 0 ( not NaN) for uninitialized values to be consistent with ViewTrait.

Revision: 13003
Revision: 13003
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-12-16 13:12:08 -0800 (Wed, 16 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
Update some unit tests to reflect that LayoutContextSprite now returns 0 (not NaN) for uninitialized values to be consistent with ViewTrait.
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFrameworkFlexTest/org/osmf/layout/TestLayoutContextSprite.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFrameworkFlexTest/org/osmf/proxies/TestListenerProxyElementAsSu bclass.as

Revision: 13003
Revision: 13003
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-12-16 13:12:08 -0800 (Wed, 16 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
Update some unit tests to reflect that LayoutContextSprite now returns 0 (not NaN) for uninitialized values to be consistent with ViewTrait.
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFrameworkFlexTest/org/osmf/layout/TestLayoutContextSprite.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFrameworkFlexTest/org/osmf/proxies/TestListenerProxyElementAsSu bclass.as

Compounding consistency for InfoObject 0PERSIDNO not ensured

Hi,
When i am creating multiprovider i am getting error message."Compounding consistency for InfoObject 0PERSIDNO not ensured".
In one of the affected InfoProviders, InfoObject 0PERSIDNO is compounded with InfoObject 0COUNTRY_ID. 0PERSIDNO is mapped to InfoObject 0PERSIDNO in the identification list. As a result, 0COUNTRY_ID is also mapped to 0COUNTRY_ID (because InfoObject 0PERSIDNO is compounded with 0COUNTRY_ID in the MultiProvider),
in my multiprovider i am using 2 infocubs and 1 dso.
Pls suggest me.

Hi,
A record of 0PERSIDNO master data is uniquely identified by the combination of 0PERSIDNO code and 0COUNTRY_ID code (it has a composite primary key).
Therefore, if you include 0PERSIDNO in your Multiprovider, you should also include and map 0COUNTRY_ID.
I hope this helps you.
Regards,
Maximiliano

SAP Note 23345 for Oracle Consistency Check

Dear All,
I would like to run a Consistency check using backup type = online option via DB VERIFY but unfortunately each time I run the backup online using the below commands I am getting permission error.I have run the commands below using ORA<SIDADM>
brbackup -u / -m all -w only_rmv -e <parallel degree> -c
brbackup -u / -m all only_dbv -c -t online -e 3
brbackup -u / -m all -w only_dbv -e 3 -c
brbackup -u / -c force -w only_dbv -t online -p init<sidadm>.sap -m ALL -e 3
brbackup -u / -c force -w only_dbv -p init<sidadm>.sap -m ALL
I hope someone could provide what is the best command to use in order to execute the Consistency check in Online mode as I am planning to schedule it on weekly basis with the Online option..
Thank you.
Regards,
John

Do not double post the same question in different forums:
SAP Note 23345 for Oracle Consistency Check
Markus

MRP is not generating purchase requisitions consistently for MRP type VB

Issue: When executing consumption based MRP in ECC 6.0 using the following parameters; purchase requisitions are not created for all material with stocks below max stock levels. In other words requisitions are created incase of some materials and requisitions are not created for others.
u2022     MRP type VB ( manual reorder point) with reorder point qty
u2022     Lot size HB with Max stock level
u2022     Procurement type F (external procurement).
Additional info: Some of these materials are batch managed and results are inconsistence whether it is batch managed or not.
Regards
Sai

I checked that and planning file entry is created.
Example 1: MRP is not working.
MRP type = VB
Lot size =HB
Procurement type= F
Material # = 1200045
Reorder point =30
Max stock level = 300
Available qty = 139
No PRs are existing before MRP.
MRP is expected to create PR for qty 161 (300-139= 161)
Example 2 : MRP is working.
MRP type = VB
Lot size =HB
Procurement type= F
Material # = 1200052
Reorder point =100
Max stock level = 1000
Available qty = 87
MRP created PR qty of 913 and results are as expected.
MRP is expected to create PR for qty 161 (1000-87= 913
NOTE: I am directly creating Purchase requisitions by selecting creation Purchase Requisitions Indicator =1 during MD01/MD02 trxs . Not creating any planned orders.

Consistent Error Message: Key not valid for use in specified state

For several years I have been trying to use iTunes. Without success, I decided to try to reinstall the program and now I am getting the above error message.

It seems we may have a more targeted solution. Based on posts in the thread key not valid for use in specified state I've just added the following to the user tip.
For "Key not valid for use in specified state" errors try moving the folder RSA from C:\Users\<User>\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Crypto\RSA to say C:\RSA (just in case there should be a need to restore it) then try installing again. This folder appears to act as a cache and should be rebuilt automatically as required.
tt2

Airport Extreme Not Consistently Assigning DHCP

I am using a relatively new (within the last year) Airport Extreme as the primary router on my home network. Connected directly to the router is a GigE switch, an AT&T Microcell, and another router - an Aruba RAP which creates a secure VPN for my home/remote office network. The connection to my Apple desktop is made through the GigE switch, as are three additional wired connections to other devices in my home, including two Apple TV's and (hopefully) two Airport Expresses.
I recently discovered when trying to configure a new Airport Express to extend my wireless network over ethernet (roaiming network) that my Airport extreme is not consistently assigning the IP addresses within it's defined DHCP range (10.0.1.0 - 10.0.1.200). About half of the time devices on the network are getting a default 169.254.x.x IP address, which (in the case of my desktop) results in an 'self assigned IP' error within the network settings. I can reboot my apple desktop and the next time it gets a correct 10.0.1.1 address. Reboot again, it defaults back to a 169 address - and so on. It doesnt seem to make any difference if I connect my desktop directly to the Extreme, or, if I connect it through the GigE switch. And, every time I get a 'self assigned IP' I have no connectivity beyond the Extreme (no internet), and I'm forced to use my wireless/Airport connection.
Another problem here is that the Expresses both expect to receive 10.x IP addresses and when they don't get one, they basically become pretty $100 paperweights when connected over ethernet. Also, if you try to configure a new Express without the 10.x address it expects to be assigned (and defaults to a 169.x), the Airport Utility will no longer 'find' the Express once the Express auto-restarts and the update will fail. I learned this after spending two hours on the phone with Apple support yesterday - during which they were able to get my first generation Express configured, but, not my 24-hour old second Generation Express, which continues to act only as a paperweight. Oddly enough, everything works perfectly well if I use only wireless connections to the Extreme - there are no IP problems and everything works correctly. Unfortunately, I want to use wired connections for all my devices (expresses, Apple TV's) because we stream alot of audio and video.
Is my Extreme not working correctly? Does anyone think it's problematic to have a second router (the Aruba) connected behind the Extreme? I suppose I could force some components to use only specific IP's, but, that sounds like a pain. If the Aruba is problematic, I would also consider a second internet connection, or, finding some way to split home IP traffic vs work IP traffic.
Thoughts?

I've been doing some research and it appears the 'self assigned IP' address is a common problem in the Apple support community. And, for what it's worth, it appears an inability to isolate or accurately troubleshoot the problem - by users or Apple tech support - is a recurring theme. I totally understand that no two home networks are exactly alike (different ISPs, switches, configurations, etc.), but, after being a die-hard PC user for my entire life I can honestly say I never encountered anything like this while using my PC. I'm not about to trash my Mac, but, the Apple 'ease of use' selling point is quickly losing it's lustre.
I got into this mess because I added a GigE switch to my network. Rather than buy a different switch (a tactic which assumes my problems are being caused by the switch) I'm inclined to buy another Airport Extreme and try daisy-chaining them together to overcome the reason I bought the GigE switch in the first place, which is not enough ethernet ports on the Extreme. That, or I'll spend a weekend in my attic re-wiring my home network to daisy-chain my two Express devices together instead of requiring individual connections to my router. My experience with Apple hardware thus far is that it prefers to 'play nice' with other Apple hardware over non-Apple hardware. It could be $100 error on my end (or, a weekend of not doing yardwork), but, I think it's the best shot. Other possible fixes, including manually assigned IP-addresses, put too much emphasis on software and network configuration - which (by my non-scentific analysis), are two areas even harder to troubleshoot.
I'll let you know how it goes.
Mh
Post Script - Dear Apple: please find a way to significantly increase the number of ethernet ports on your Airport Extreme Router. Thank you.

VERSION 0 IS NOT DEFINED FOR FISACL YEAR 2007,

i am learning SAP PP and i hv ides 4.7,
now WHEN SAVING ORDER i.e DURING COST CALCULATION I GET A MESSAGE THAT VERSION 0 IS NOT DEFINED FOR FISACL YEAR 2007,
ON ANALYSING IT LEADS TO T.CODE OKEV BUT HERE SYSTEM DOES NOT PERMIT TO CHANGE THE VERSION, BUT IN ECC 5.0 IT ALLOWS ,
WHAT IS THE PROBLEM, CAN ANY ONE PL. HELP ME,
analysis of error gives following message:
Activation of the indicator is not permitted
Message no. KT253
Diagnosis
You activated an indicator (Plan, Actual, WIP/results analysis or Variance calculation ) in the basic settings for version 1 in controlling area 1000. However, a higher order of settings (general version definition) prevents you from setting this indicator in version 1.
Note
The following should be taken into account when maintaining a version:
In general version definition you decide whether a version is allowed for
     Panning (with the Plan indicator)
     Actual data update (with the Actual indicator)
Note: In Overhead Cost Controlling, actual data is updated in operational version 0.
Actual versions different from 0 are found at present only for delta versions in Activity Based Costing (CO-ABC), and when you work with parallel assesment ( additional versions):
     A data version from results and WIP determination manages (indicator WIP)
     Another version from variance determination manages (indicator Variance)
     A version for exclusive use (field exclusive application)
You must maintain the version basic settings for each controlling area in which you want to update transaction data. General version definition restricts the settings possible for the controlling area:
     If general version definition does not allow plan and/or actual data update for version, this applies to the version in all controlling areas. If plan and/or actual data updating is allowed for a version in general definition, this can be reset for each controlling area separately (unmark the plan or actual indicator).
     Delta versions in ABC may not be used for parallel valuations in the actual; the same goes for versions with exclusive applications. In both cases, the valuation fields may not be maintained.
To set indicators WIP/Results- or Variance-determination the following conditions apply:
     Both indicators may be set only during setup for the controlling area, when they are already established in the higher level general version definition
     If either indicator is already active in the data bank, then the actual indicator may not be subsequently activated
     If the actual indicator is inactive and either of these indicators is active, then the valuations in the corresponding versions and in version "000" must agree
     If the actual indicator is active, then both indicators must be activated
Versions 0 and 1 are used regularly for various purposes by the system, which sets the following limitations/restrictions:
     Version 0 must always be available. It cannot be used exclusively. The plan and actual indicators must always be active.
     The actual indicator may not be activated in version 1.
If these conditions are violated during version maintenance, error messages are issued. There are three types of error message:
1. While maintaining the general version definition, you can only make changes if they do not violate the conditions outlined above.
2. While maintaining the basic settings in the controlling area, the entries must remain consistent with the higher level entries.
3. You want to maintain version 0 or 1. The restrictions outlined above apply.
Use the "Extras" menu option to display the structure of the entries in the complex data object version:
     Select a version and choose Extras -> Version use.
The SAP System shows which controlling areas use this version.
     Select Extras -> Versions in CO area
This displays all versions used in the current controlling area.
The subordinate entries in the hierarchy (settings for each fiscal year, strategic Activity-Based Costing: transactions for a delta versions) will also be shown for both cases.
Procedure
Do not activate the indicator, or change the higher order of settings in the general version definition.

Raj,
What are you trying to change?
To me you are not suppose to make any changes, you need to select the version "0" and then hit "Settings for each Fiscal year" subfolder.... here you copy the settings of 2006 and change the year to 2007. This should resolve the problem.
Regards,
Prasobh

Business partner of organizational unit is not consistent

Hi,
Client is on SRM 4.0. When we are trying to search a user in the org structure, and when clicking on "Check" for this user, it was showing fine. But when we are searching any BP in the org strucutre, then immediately the BP name is vanishing against the BP of the user and when doing the "Check" it is showing the below two messages:
Business Partner of organizational unit XXXXXXX is not consistent
User cannot be repaired becasue the organizational unit contains errors
When checking in BBP_CHECK_USRES, the user is not showing as defective. It is green.
Similarly, the the organizational unit check is also showing as green.
System is advising to run BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE. When we run this for the org units, these are coming as green.
Users are able to create the shopping carts and also are able to create confirmations. But the problem is happening for some of the users where the system is not allowing to create shopping basket / confirmation.
Strange thing is that, when we are searching the user by user id in the org structure, then the check is showing no messages. But if we search the same user using the BP number, then in the check, the messages are coming. And once the messages appear, it is appearing for all the users in the org strucutre even at the root node level.
Any help is highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Aswini

Hi Aswini,
There are some possibilities to raise these kind of errors messages:
1) User with inconsistent data.
Please, check the instructions described in the following notes:
597475 - Repair users with inconsistent address data
-> use the report B_REPAIR_EBP_USER_2 to make the user consistent.
419423 - Repairing incorrect EBP users
350129 - Creating business partner for organizational unit
When you create the Org Units have you fully completed the address
data, e.g post coe, telephone/fax number etc..
If not, please enter a full address, save the data and see if this
generates the Business Partner.
Remember, that you can delete this user and create a new user.
2) Error in the positions after HR replication
Please, implement the following notes and retest the scenario:
1056873 - Incorrect SRM users after HR distribution
1016450 - Replication of persons deletes positions in SRM
After implementing these notes you should send the employee
corresponsing to the user in error with his position (using
transaction PFAL or report RHALEINI in UPDATE mode for all periods.
3) the user was deleted and a new was created and during these two
actions the user opened documents. So, in this case, the new user
becomes inconsistent
If the user is deleted from SU01 still the BP and S which is related to
that user will be retained (we can see this in PPOMA_BBP) transaction.
In this case we can create the user again using SU01 and can be attached
with the old 'S' and 'BP'.
2. If the user is completed deleted ie., all relations BP and S.
The new user has created.
In this case if the new user is corrupted we can delete this
user (since the new user doesn't create any documents so far). But the
old documents should refer to the new BP related to the new user.
========================
Also, another option would be to follow the below instructions
After applying the notes 1056873 & 1016450, send the employees
corresponding to the users in errors with their positions (using
transaction PFAL or report RHALEINI in UPDATE mode for all periods,
using evaluation path A008) ? If not, please do this and it must repair
the SRM users. Please test and give me the feedback.
Hope this helps,
Kind Regards,
Matthew

GL Account not consistent

Hi
When we are processing MIGO for a PO we are getting error message GL ac so and so in not consistent and if I double click on that message below detial message is getting displayed:
This line item carries the "W" posting line identification. The master record for GL Account 2150000 in company code 1000 must have the "balance only in local currency " indicator if the W identifier is set.
What is "W" posting line identification. Please let me know the solution for this issue
Regards
Padma.

Hi,
As this error is pertaining to GL master check this account under FS00 and tick "only balance in local currency" as it is your GR/IR clearing account which should be managed as open item basis.
Moreover, also make sure field status to this GL (for line item) and of account group (obd4) are in sync.
In OBYC, you have assigned this account under your wrx i.e. GR/IR clearing.
Hope above will help you.
Regards,
Valay Pandya

Ocr not consistent for me

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for