ODT error in VS2005: Value was either too large or too small for an Int32

Using ODT's Oracle Explorer in VS2005 I connected to a 3rd party's Oracle9i database that's been around for a while. I expanded the tables node and then attempted to expand a specific table. It then displayed a popup message and never expanded the table so I could manage the columns.
The error is:
An error ocurred while expanding the node:
Value was either too large or too small for an Int32
I recreated the table, with no data, in another database (same version of oracle, different physical server) and was able to expand the table in ODT's Oracle Explorer.
I went back to the other database in Oracle Explorer and tried to expand the table and it failed with the same error message.
The only difference I can see is that the first table contains ALOT of data (gigabytes), while the other table (the duplicate I created to duplicate the error) does not have any data.
here's the definition of the table minus the actual table and field names.
FLD6 contains jpg data from a 3rd party Oracle Forms application. The jpg data is between 100K and 20MB.
CREATE TABLE myTable
FLD1 VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),
FLD2 VARCHAR2(15 BYTE),
FLD3 VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
FLD4 VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
FLD5 NUMBER(3),
FLD6 LONG RAW,
FLD7 VARCHAR2(80 BYTE),
FLD8 DATE,
FLD9 VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
FLD10 VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
FLD11 VARCHAR2(99 BYTE),
FLD12 VARCHAR2(256 BYTE)
TABLESPACE myTableSpace
PCTUSED 0
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 1
MAXTRANS 255
STORAGE (
INITIAL 2048M
MINEXTENTS 1
MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0
BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
NOCACHE
NOPARALLEL
NOMONITORING;
This is just to let the developers know I ran into a problem. I've already gotten around the issue by using an alternative tool.

Hi,
You can also use the Map TestTool to test your maps. It uses the BizTalk engine to execute the map. You can select a map that is deployed to the GAC en execute it.
You can download the sample tool with the source code here:
TestTool for BizTalk 2013
http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/Execute-BizTalk-2013-maps-e8db7f9e
TestTool for BizTalk 2010
http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/Execute-a-BizTalk-map-from-26166441
Kind regards,
Tomasso Groenendijk
Blog 
|  Twitter
MCTS BizTalk Server 2006, 2010
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly

Similar Messages

  • Azure + Sync Framework + Error: Value was either too large or too small for a UInt64

    Hi,
    We have an in-house developed syncronisation service built on the Sync Framework v2.1 which has been running well for over 2 years. It pushes data from a local SQLServer 2005 database to one hosted on Azure with some added encryption.
    The service was stopped recently and when we try to re-start it, it fails with the error:
    System.OverflowException: Value was either too large or too small for a UInt64.
    at System.Convert.ToUInt64(Int64 value)
    at System.Int64.System.IConvertible.ToUInt64(IFormatProvider provider)
    at System.Convert.ToUInt64(Object value, IFormatProvider provider)
    at Microsoft.Synchronization.Data.SyncUtil.ParseTimestamp(Object obj, UInt64& timestamp)
    at Microsoft.Synchronization.Data.SqlServer.SqlSyncScopeHandler.GetLocalTimestamp(IDbConnection connection, IDbTransaction transaction)
    I have found the Hotfix 2703853, and we are proposing to apply this to our local server, but we have found that running SELECT CONVERT(INT, @@dbts) on the local database returns 1545488692 but running the same query on the Cloud database returns -2098169504.
    which indicates the issue is on the Azure side. Would applying the hotfix to our local server resolve the issue or would it need to be somehow applied to the Azure server?
    Thanks in advance for any assistance!
    Chris

    Hi,
    We have now applied the Sync Framework hotfixes to our server and re-provisioned the sync service. No errors were reported and the timestamp values were all within the required range. On re-starting the service the system worked as anticipated. It has now
    been running for a week and appears to be stable. No further changes were required other than installing the hotfixes and re-provisioning the scope.
    Chris

  • Quotacheck: searchfs Result too large: Result too large

    Aside from a 2006 post regarding this issue, I'm unsure how to resolve my scenario. We're using OSX server's time machine AFP goodies, but we needed to enable quotas for users. Simple? Maybe, but not mac style... so you head into the terminal, read some old posts on outdated forums... use repquota, quotacheck, and quotaon...
    And everything seemed to work, until you add a user (through edquota) who's quota isn't in fstab, who can't be found in repquota...
    sigh...
    I turned off quota checking, tried starting from scratch... what do I get with but an error who's last mention on this forum is from 2006:
    sudo quotacheck -a -v
    * Checking user and group quotas for /dev/rdisk4 (/Volumes/ColdStorage)
    34
    quotacheck: searchfs Result too large: Result too large
    Any ideas of ways around? The 2006 posts seem to indicate that after attempting variations of quotacheck, I might eventually break through!

    Hello,
    I've run into the same issue on our setup as well. (Xserve G5 10.4.8, data is an Xserve RAID, level 5 1TB, used for home directories) I'm working with Apple to see if there is a solution to this issue or if it is a bug. In the meanwhile, they recommended running quotacheck with the path to the share rather then -a
    sudo quotacheck -v /Volumes/OURDATA
    Using the command this way seems to work about half of the time for me, the other half still giving the same error message. I'm hoping this is a cosmetic issue with quotacheck, and not a hint of a problem with our setup.
    I'll be sure to post if I find anything else out.
    Matt Bryant
    ACTC
    Husson College and the New England School of Communications

  • Error btm1050: XSL transform error: Unable to write output instance to the following "location". Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. Value was either too large or too small for a Decimal.

    BizTalk Map error. Can you please suggest what could be the reason for this.

    Hi,
    You can also use the Map TestTool to test your maps. It uses the BizTalk engine to execute the map. You can select a map that is deployed to the GAC en execute it.
    You can download the sample tool with the source code here:
    TestTool for BizTalk 2013
    http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/Execute-BizTalk-2013-maps-e8db7f9e
    TestTool for BizTalk 2010
    http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/Execute-a-BizTalk-map-from-26166441
    Kind regards,
    Tomasso Groenendijk
    Blog 
    |  Twitter
    MCTS BizTalk Server 2006, 2010
    If this answers your question please mark it accordingly

  • Job scheduling error : The return value was unknown. The process exit code was -1073741819. The step failed.

    I am working in Sqlserver 2008 R2, SSIS 64 bit version
    I am getting the below  error while scheduling the job in the development server  Database. 
    The return value was unknown.  The process exit code was -1073741819.  The step failed.
    The SSIS front end execution runs fine.
    Have anyone  faced this issue before?

    Hi Venkat,
    If you already changed to 64bit and still doesn't work then create proxy account.. 
    To create a proxy account
    In Object Explorer, expand a server.
    Expand SQL Server Agent.
    Right-click Proxies and select New Proxy.
    On the General page of the New Proxy Account dialog, specify the proxy name, credential name, and
    description for the new proxy. Note that you must create a credential first before you create a proxy if one is not already available. For more information about creating a credential, see How
    to: Create a Credential (SQL Server Management Studio) or CREATE CREDENTIAL (Transact-SQL).
    Check the appropriate subsystem for this proxy.
    On the Principals page, add or remove logins or roles to grant or remove access to the proxy account.
    Thanks

  • Error: The chosen certificate was not exported and cannot be used for SSL

    Hello there,
    when I try to configure the profilemanager in OS X Server and it comes to choose a certificate i get the following message:
    The chosen certificate cannot be used.
    The chosen certificate was not exported and cannot be used for SSL.
    I chose our Wildcard certificate we received from Thawte.
    It is completely imported in the Keychain from the Mac.
    (Sorry if any sentence is wrong, I translated it from german to english)
    Best regards,
    Christoph

    Is this a regular web ssl cert or a code signing cert?

  • Deserialization failed: Value was either too large or too small for an Int32.

    hi all
    I'm getting below error when I click on Properties of Datasource in Sql server analysis server;
    kindly help me.

    Hi BI_group,
    First, please ensure that you have the permission to view the data source of the cube. And then under C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.4\OLAP\Log (this could be different for your server), there are 3 log files that are generated:
    msmdrrv.log
    FlightRecorderCurrent.trc
    FightRecorderBack.trc
    The msmdrrv.log simply points to the other two logs. There might be some detail information for this error.
    Besides, you can restart the server and then check if this issue persists or not.
    If the issue persists, please post the detail error message on the error log, so that we can make further analysis.
    Regards,
    Charlie Liao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Just paid $23.88, but my file couldn't be converted. "12345_2014.pdf" failed to export to docx. The file is either too large or too complex to export.

    what could I do?

    Hi Karl_ma.
    I'm sorry that the file didn't convert for you. How large is the file you're trying to convert? There's a 100MB file-size limit. Overly complex files that fall within this limit may not convert, depending on your upload speed and so on.
    You can try converting with OCR disabled as outlined in this document: How to disable Optical Character Recognition, which will simplify the conversion process.
    Please let us know how it goes.
    Best,
    Sara

  • JSFL function exportPNG failing with "bitmap too large" error.

    I'm trying to export to PNG from the JSFL document.exportPNG function with 'bCurrentPNGSettings' but it fails. Flash keeps complaining that "The bitmap is too large. The largest bitmap that can be created is 8000x800 pixels."
    The width x height of the document is set to 1920x1080 and I've tried modifying the publish profile appropriately. Still no-dice.
    If I set 'bCurrentPNGSettings' to false so that the export dialog appears it pops up with the correct width and height; clicking OK exports properly.
    Anyone have any ideas?
    Cheers.

    I am experiencing a similar problem. I have hundreds of symbols, most of which export just fine. A few symbols, however, do not. Although these symbols are typically modest in size, 1x49 pixels for example, Flash throws the error "The bitmap is too large. The largest bitmap that can be created is 8000x8000 pixels." which halts the script until it is acknowledged by the user.
    It seems that this "too large" error might appear anytime the width or height is out of range, as in it is either too large OR too small. If you allow the Export PNG dialog box to appear (or manually do a File...Export Image...), it has a Width of 4 pixels. When I try to correct the value to 1 pixel, another error is shown saying "Please enter a number between 4 and 8000." Anything outside this range will not be accepted.
    I also noticed that when I specified "false, true" for the optional 2nd and third parameters, the Export PNG dialog fails to appear.
    I am using Flash Pro CS5 on a PC.
    I tried this using Flash CS4/PC. I had an even worse time with the dialog, as I changed the width and height, it automatically changed the dpi from 72 to whatever value entered.
    So in order for the script to be able to exportPNG on all of the symbols in the library, I have to first check the symbol's dimensions, and either abort the export operation, or correct the values, forcing a minimum dimension of 4 pixels.

  • Mkisofs: Value too large for defined data type too large

    Hi:
    Does anyone meet the problem when use mkisofs command?
    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
    Warning: creating filesystem that does not conform to ISO-9660.
    mkisofs 2.01 (sparc-sun-solaris2.10)
    Scanning iso
    Scanning iso/rac_stage1
    mkisofs: Value too large for defined data type. File iso/rac_stage3/Server.tar.gz is too large - ignoring
    Using RAC_S000 for /rac_stage3 (rac_stage2)
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Thanks!

    An update on the original bug. This is the direct link to launchpad bug 455122:
    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour … bug/455122

  • Firefox 22 and higher shows fonts too big or too small, sometimes on the same page. How to "fix" this annoying 'improvement"?

    Since the update *every* website displays with the fonts too big or too small. On many websites, some of the fonts are too big and some are too small *on the same page*
    This makes for a horrible browsing experience.
    I've tried setting the layout.css.PixelsPerPx to a value of 1, but all it does is make most websites fonts too small, while leaving some websites fonts too large, with many web pages having fonts simultaneously too large and too small.
    The old behavior was quite acceptable and I'd really like to restore the behavior to what it was. How can I do that? Or do i just switch to Chrome and be done with it?

    Did you even bother to read the question?
    "I've tried setting the layout.css.PixelsPerPx to a value of 1, but all it does is make most websites fonts too small, while leaving some websites fonts too large, with many web pages having fonts simultaneously too large and too small."
    This "fix" doesn't work. Hundreds of people are complaining about how their browser was broken by this "improvement". Why not address the real problem instead of telling users to apply a useless hack to fix a programming error?

  • The underlying connection was closed: Could not establish trust relationship for the SSL/TLS secure channel.

    I tried to redeem a digital download copy of a movie and was presented the following error: 
    The underlying connection was closed: Could not establish trust relationship for the SSL/TLS secure channel.
    Any guesses on what it is and how to resolve it?
    Thanks

    Hi
    Abhilash Francis,
    Could you tell us your scenario?  What's your project? Is it a WCF service?
    Looks like this is not a code issue.
    Just from the error information,
    it seems that you do not configure the service certificate very well so as to Server was unable to process request.
    I am not completely sure  what the real scenario is, but it might be a problem of that It is a WCF services application,  please check these following articles to configure the service certificate.
    If not, please feel free to let me know.
    How to: Configure an IIS-hosted WCF service with SSL
    Could not establish trust
    relationship for the SSL/TLS secure channel
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Kristin
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Result set too large

    Hi Experts,
      When I run BI report on SAP portal, it shows me the message : Result set too large...., I had changed BICS_DA_RESULT_SET_LIMIT_MAX and BICS_DA_RESULT_SET_LIMIT_DEF, but I don't know how to(and where) config "safety belt", somebody can teach me that!? thanks a lot!

    Note 1127156 - Safety belt: Result set is too large
    Oops too late...!!! did not see earlier reply
    Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Jul 6, 2010 9:31 PM

  • How can I insert a number of photos in a numbers doc without the file becoming too large?

    How can I insert a number of photos into a numbers doc without the file becoming too large?

    Use smaller photos.
    Seriously, reduce the file size of the photos in Preview, PhotoShop, iPhoto or other application before inserting tehem into the Numbers document.
    Regards,
    Barry

  • Very large file 1.6 GB..sports program for school. lots of photos, template where media spots saved and dropped photos in..trying to get it to printer swho says its too large but when reduces size loses all quality...HELP??

    Please help...large file my sons Athletic program. Had noto problem with Quality last year..this new printer said file is too large..too many layers, can I FLATTEN..He reduced size and photos look awful. It is 81 pages. Have to have complete before next friday!! Help anyone??

    At that size it sounds like you have inserted lots of photos at too large a size and resolution.
    Especially for a year book style project, first determine your image sizes and crop and fix the resolution to 300 dpi, then drag them into the publication. Pages does not use external references to files and rapidly grows to quite large size unless you trim and size your images before placement.
    Peter

Maybe you are looking for