OIM 9.1.0.2 - Interface issues

Gurus,
I'm facing a strange behavior in OIM interface.
When provisioning a user to a target (it's a custom connector) the task,
which is in pending status, shows a (***********) in the notes information.
If I add a note, through OIM interface, to the task it still shows the
I have a java code which programatically add notes to pending or
rejected tasks.
Even though the task shows: (***********).
If I select the SCH table (SCH_NOTE column) it shows the correct added
notes.
If I get the "Process Instance.Task Details.Note" String in the java
program it shows the correct added notes.
Has anybody seen this behavior before?
I have 2 instances of this custom connector and only one shows this
behavior.
TiA,
Carlos

Hi Gurus,
Regarding to issue reported above, I have found the bug 7590135 (https://bug.oraclecorp.com/pls/bug/webbug_edit.edit_info_top?rptno=7590135 ).
For that bug, as informed in the bug below, there was released a fix in the 9.1.0.2 BP 01.
In that bug there is the following information:
@ We need to add following property in 9101BP01 release document to fix this
@ issue.
@ <store>
@ <Note>
@ <SpecialField>true</SpecialField>
@ </Note>
@ </store>
@ true : to show the decrypted value for password field
@ false : to show blank value for password field
By the code below is possible to verify the status of the attribute:
tcProvisioningOperationsIntf taskOperations = (tcProvisioningOperationsIntf) this.getUtilityOperations("Thor.API.Operations.tcProvisioningOperationsIntf");
Map<String, String> filtro = new HashMap<String, String>();
//filtro.put("Objects.Name", "Sistema Atlys");
//filtro.put("Objects.Name", "Sistema PP");
statusFiltro[0] = "Pending";
tcResultSet tarefas = taskOperations.findAllOpenProvisioningTasks(filtro, statusFiltro);
for(int i=0; i<tarefas.getRowCount(); i++)
     tarefas.goToRow(i);
     long tKey = tarefas.getLongValue("Process Instance.Task Details.Key");
     System.out.println("isTaskNoteEncrypted: [" + this.taskOperations.isTaskNoteEncrypted(tKey) + "]");
RESULTS:
- "Sistema Atlys" resultado: "isTaskNoteEncrypted: [true]"
- "Sistema PP" resultado: "isTaskNoteEncrypted: [false]"
Can I consider that bug the same I have faced?
And the problem now is, How can I configure the Note to be displaying not encrypted results? Is this a system property (OIM)??
Regards,
Edited by: user12295533 on 23/05/2011 13:21

Similar Messages

Are USB audio interface issues on iMac Haswell resolved?

HI,
i just ordered a 27 inch iMac, maxed out with a 1TB SSD.
I noticed the imac doesn't have an audio in jack and figured i'd shop for a good USB Audio Interface.
But then i came across all these USB audio interface issues on the new iMac.
This is incredible to me because iMacs are often used by creative people and lots of musicians.
For me audio is VERY important. I record music and i record sound for animation and video.
Apple thus far seemed to be avoiding the topics and issues at hand.
Are the USB audio issues resolved? What was resolved? What was the problem (Maverick? Fusion Drive)?
Is it wise to choose for a Thunderbolt Interface? Which one?
Any help would be hugely appreciated.
Especcialy since it seems such a wide spread problem.
Thanx

doubt it would be a general issue
usb is a universal serial bus it always require a driver for anything
and the driver of one external audio device would act different then the driver from another external audio device
so it would be very unlikely that an external audio card using a cirrus logic audio chip would cause the same issues with the imac as one with a realtek or soundblaster audio chip
not that there could not be issues with all of them but not likely that they would suffer from the same issue

Two storage box (3510 and 6140) interface issue...

Hi All,
In my setup we were previously used storage box 3510 but having space issues we are purchasing new storage box of six series 6140. Now, I don't have any clear idea that both the storage can easily mounted on the servers? or there are some interface issues might be?
Can anyone suggest me what are the points(like network, HD and etc.) I have to consider for the compatibility of these storage box?
Thanks...

Hi user505
Now, I don't have any clear idea that both the storage can easily mounted on the servers? or there are some interface issues might be?How many HBA's do your current hosts that are connected to the 3510 have ? are they are single port single card or dual ported card ?.
Depending on how many HBA's you have in your server I would configure up the 6140 with the initiators , map the new volumes straight to the server and then do your copying of data.
In regards to network config etc you'd need to setup the 6140 as per the normal configuration for out of band access , so you can get it via CAM.
Hope that helps
David

OIM 11.1.1.3 installation issues

Hi All,
I am facing issue while trying to install OIM 11G (11.1.1.3.0). I have installed SOA 11.1.1.4.0, OIM 11.1.1.3.0 and have used RCU 11.1.1.4.0. After installing these components, I am trying to run the config.sh from the <IDM_HOME>/common/bin and have selected Oracle Identity Manager ,Oracle SOA Suite, Oracle Enterprise Manager, Oracle WSM Policy Manager, Oracle JRF from the template options.
During this we are required to enter the schema information along with database details. I provided the same which I got from RCU. The utility then checks the database for those details but fails on OIM MDS Schema component check. I believe this might be an issue with the utility because the Database Query which is run for checking the OIM MDS Schema is looking for version 11.1.1.2.0 and not 11.1.1.4. Also for OWSM MDS Schema component check, the same query runs but for version 11.1.1.4 in the query.
Both the queries are same except for the version for which it is testing. Thus one of them is bound to fail. This utility checks 6 components in total and out of which only 1 is failing. I have already checked the schema_version_registry and there for mr_type=’MDS’ there is just one row and that has owner=’DEVOIM_MDS’ and version=’11.1.1.4.0’.
Will appreciate if anyone has any idea about this or have seen it earlier.
Another question which I have is about the compatibility for OIM 11.1.1.3.0, what are the supported versions of SOA, RCU and OFM IAM for this release of OIM as the latest OIM version is 11.1.1.3.0 while all the other components are 11.1.1.4.0.
Thanks,
BB

Rajiv Dewan wrote:
which are released on 11.1.1.4.0Not sure what you are asking but OIM 11g is certified with SOA Software to 11.1.1.3.0.
After the installation is complete, you must run the Patch Set Installer for Oracle SOA Suite (included in the Disk1 directory under the soa_patchset.zip file) to >>update your 11.1.1.2.0 software to the latest version of Oracle SOA Suite (11.1.1.3.0).
On March 8th I believe Oracle has release SOA 11.1.1.4.0 and somewhere in the docs it says it is supported while same places it skips them out totally. I will go ahead with 11.1.1.2.0 with upgrade to 11.1.1.3.0
Thanks!

ECC 6.0 to XI 3.0 e-Filing GB EOYR Interface Issue

Hi,
We are experiencing the following issue when attempting to file EOYR returns via our XI system.
We have other scenarios (INYMV) that work perfectly via the same technical setup.
The config in our DEV ECC to XI 3.0 system works for EOYR!
The error seems to be in the proxy code of HR_GB_EFO_EOYR_OUT in the ECC system, we have traced in debug and it fails to send the message payload.
The following error is then thrown and is visible in the PB2A transaction:
Error during XML => ABAP conversion (Response Message; error
ID: CX_ST_MATCH_ELEMENT; (/1SAI/TXSA28012A0D96A87DF29D4 XML
Bytepos.: 83 XML Path: GovTalkMessage(1) Error Text: Syste
m expected the element '{http://sap.com/xi/HR}GovTalkMessage
I can't find any other errors, even with Integration Server tracing set to 3 in both ECC and XI.
It looks like a namespace issue but the interface (e-Filing) is distrubuted by SAP themselves, we just import the XI Content.
We have ECC HRSP 52 applied (ECC 6.00), XI Content for e-Filing SP17 and XI HR Content SP50.
These all seem to be compatible according to the notes within notes within notes that I've found.
Any other suggestions?? How can I trace this?
Does the SLD Content have any effect on this?
We have a call open with SAP for 6 days now and I'm considering re-doing the work in DEV and transporting through to PRD XI again.

SAP fixed for us.
Config issue in integration builder.

Acrobat X interface issues (particularly in commenting)

I have not been very impressed with the interface changes with Acrobat. I don't mind that they have adopted a new accordion style interface so much (Although the do seem to be reinventing the wheel with each release). What I do see as a major issue is that the desicion to go with a non native interface causes it to be very quirky, sluggish and unpredictable.
I do a LOT of annual reports. And I have always found the PDF markup to be invaluable for alterations. I used to be able to receive a PDF with 800+ comments and display them on the side and check them off one by one with ease! But now since the upgrade the commenting panel has caused me to be about half as productive.
* If I right hand click a comment to mark it as "completed" I have to move quite slowly and precicly over the contextual submens and sometimes click on "complete" multiple times. If I move over things too quickly the menu dissapears.
* I uesed to be able to filter completed comments as I go so that once I checked it, it dissapeard from the list making it easy to keep trak of what had been completed and what needed completing. Now to acheive this I have to force the filter to refresh by turning the filter of and on again each time I want to get rid of completed comments. This is a killer
* Scrolling through the comments in the comments pannel is the worst! Sometimes I might be just clickin on a comment and for no reason Acrobat X will srcoll up or down hiding your next comment. If you click on the scroll bar arrows I tend to find they have poor reponsivness and you will find yourself lost in the list very quickly. And dont even bother with your mouse scrolling wheel... it looks like it is trying to scroll but is working against natual forces.
Very dissapointed with this release. Adobe software should be like a workhorse, able to handle heavy loads... however these silly atsthetic choices seem to be lagging the most basic tools down.
I dont know... I am just feeling realy let down about this. This software is not cheap!

You probably don't want to hear this but some of this things have been improved in Acrobat XI - specifically you can undock the Comments list. Please feel free to voice your comments and concerns here in the Feature Request/Bug Report Form.

EDI Transmission Issue!! Interface issue

Dear Experts,
I've been trying to connect with Client system for a couple of weeks now to debug and iron-out a possible issue we uncovered in our parallel EDI transmissions from our SAP system back on April 29th and 30th. The EDI Transmission is not happening. We're not able to establish the interface with the Warehouse Managment System. Please suggest some solutions.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
What systems are you trying to connect. ECC with SAP WMS(Decentral)?.....In this case you will have to look at the Distribution model between the systems. Are you using any Middleware?
Thanks
Vinod.

ITunes 10.0 interface issue: Not displaying media

So I downloaded iTunes 10.0 when the update was available and hadn't experienced any problems, however I had an independent problem that required me to reinstall my OS and since then when I open iTunes my library won't show up even though when I press 'Play' the first song in my library starts.
I have tried backing up my library and then uninstalling iTunes and reinstalling it with a brand new library and I still have the same issue. I am currently totally up to date with all updates and after thoroughly searching I can't find anyone experiencing the same problem.
Any advice/help/suggestions would be great. Thanks.
Also just to describe how the interface appears to you for example if I go to the iTunes store page in iTunes the page shows up perfectly but then when I click 'Music' it stays on the iTunes store page visually but there is no active content in that window space. I hope that makes sense.

Same thing for me, plus when choosing "parental" in iTune Preference an unknown error appears (-50)
need help please

OIM 10g Database App Table GTC Issue Provisioing Failing --- Urgent Help :(

I am new to OIM.
I installed DB Table GTC pointing to one of the MySql table.
Now when tried to provisioin a user from amdin screen after approval it is faling at Systemvalidation stage with status "Rejected"
The meesage is "Setting task status... "Approve" does not correspond to a known Response Code. Using "UNKNOWN"."
Any idea on how to resolve the same?
Thanks,
Anirban
Edited by: 944058 on Sep 18, 2012 9:21 AM

I found where the issue was.
probbaly the connector was not configured properly.
In the process detials there is a task
System validation
I added response code "Approve" and "Approved" to "C" (earllier not there) and added "create user" task for both of them as "Task to generate"
Then direct assignment worked

Report to report Interface issue in Web Analyzer

Hi,
Report to report interface for one of the queries works fine in Development ,Quality and Production systems through BEx Analyzer ,where as it shows the wrong values in receiver query when we try to use it through Web Analyzer of production.In production Bex Analyzer it works fine and even it works fine in web analyzer of Development and Quality systems and the issue is with RRI in Web Analyzer of Production system only
                Please help me to solve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Madhu.

Hi ,
Youi can check this tables
                    MKPF               material document
     MSEG               material document (item level)
                    RESB                                Material reservations
     RKPF                                 header
Rergards
SANIL

OIM 11g - User Management Authorization policy issues

Hello,
1) Created an organization -> Human Resource
2) Created an Role -> HR_Admins
3) Assigned HR_Admins roles as administrative role of Human Resource organization
4) Created user1 with organization as Human Resource & Assigned HR_Admins role to this user.
5) Created authorization policy for user management with following selections
Permission -> Create User.
Data Constraints -> Selected "Users that are members of selected Organizations" & selected above Human Resource organization.
Assignment -> HR_Admins role .
now when i log into user1 i am not able to see Administration tab where i can select Create user.
I am working on this issue for couple of days ,but not able to find the solution & have i missed some configurations ?
Thank-You
Rahul Shah

Hi Rahul,
I have tested your scenarion.. with below clause
1) Created an organization -> Human Resource
2) Created an Role -> HR_Admins
3) Assigned HR_Admins roles as administrative role of Human Resource organization
4) Created user1 with organization as Human Resource & Assigned HR_Admins role to this user. : default role All Users
5) Created authorization policy for user management with following selections
Permission -> Create User. :- *"Select ALL"*
Data Constraints -> Selected "Users that are members of selected Organizations" & selected above Human Resource organization.
Assignment -> HR_Admins role .
In data constraints
Organization Security Setting Hierarchy Aware (include all Child Organizations)
Now I am able to see the create user tab and, I can create user in Human Resource org only.
If it doesn't work for you. Just assign "REQUEST ADMINISTRATOR" IN AUTH POLICY. Test the result.
Also what is your OIM version?
Test it with fresh data like new role name, org and user,
-kuldeep
Edited by: Kuldeep on May 22, 2012 4:19 AM

PP-WM Interface issue

I have activated PP interface with WM.I have one plant & 2 storage locations & 2 warehouse. I have assigned one WH to one s.loc & another WH to another storage location.
I have created 2 supply area & 2 routings & assigned the supply area to each one.
I have created 2 control cycle for each warehouse.
I have created 2 production order. The system is creating TR for both the production order.
But when I goto LB13 & try to create TO,the system is creating TO for one production order both in FG & BG.
But the system is not able to create, TO for the second Production order in FG & BG(These material are assigned to diff s.loc. in material master
When I checked the PO components overview,the system had pickedn s.loc of the first WH.I manually changed it in CO02,to second s.loc.
When I tried to create TO in LB13 in BG ,the system throws a error message
System unable to find source storage bin
I tried with FG,the sytem is unable to find the specific storage type & Bin. & it is showing the other storage type which is not connected to this s.loc
There is sufficient stock for the BOM materials.
What might be the issue?

When I checked the PO components overview,the system had pickedn s.loc of the first WH.I manually changed it in CO02,to second s.loc.
This change in the order does not effect existing TRs
These material are assigned to diff s.loc. in material master
what do you mean with assigned? if you mean the storage location view exists, then this just means nothingfor your current problem. SAP only cares about the value in field "issuing storage location" , this is your actual link between the storage location in your order and material master. the storage location view in material master is only needed at the time when you actually post a goods movement to this location.

Interface Issue in PI7.1 - Unable to find receiver

Hi,
I have a strange issue cropping up. An interface has gone for production. Now due to some support packs being installed on the target side, they are testing few interfaces in Dev environment again. But this time it is not working. This interface was tested long back.
Issue:
PI receives message from SAP but is unable to send the message to target
Error Shown:
<SAP:Stack>No receiver could be determined</SAP:Stack>
-->
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No Relation found - accept given Receivers. </Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing! </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST"></Trace>

Observation and Steps Taken for checking:
No conditions are there for Receiver Determination. Its a simple proxy to http scenario.
I performed the unit testing. Did the configuration testing as well as have sent a same payload to the target system using RWB.
All are successful and message also reached target successfully.
But when SAP sends it gets stuck. i have the same issue with 2 interfaces, both having the same problem.
Please Guide me.
Thanks,
Kevin

Hi Kevin,
Then the old method which we use to follow here.. Do a dummy change (like putting some value in description) in Receiver determination and activate it.
See if this solves the problem.
BTW you were saying that a successful message comes when you test this interface from RWB or test configuration; but when you test from SAP it is throwing this error!!!
try comparing all fields in SOAP header field. Also try comparing the "trace" in both cases.
Regards
Suraj

Possible interface issues on cisco 3725 router

I have a router that has been working great for almost 2 years now, has had the occisonal reset due to power failures but, I have not adjusted the configuration for a long time, until today trying to diagnose the issue thats occuring.
Here is the setup, a Cisco 3725, with three network interfaces, FE 0/0 connected to cable modem, FE 0/1 connected to the 10.0.1.x and FE0/1.10 vlan for call manager express ip phones. I then have a third interface FE 1/0 that acts as my DMZ where I keep servers. Both FE 0/0 and FE 1/0 are behind the NAT. Just yesterday I noticed that the internet traffic stops on the FE 0/1 interface after a few hours local VLAN routing works from FE0/1 to FE 1/0 and I can ssh into the router just no web traffic, I reset and it starts working again, odd thing is the DMZ still has internet during this entire time, which makes me think the interface is faling. Is there any logs or commands I can do when the interface fails again to see if its a bad interface on the router?
I isolated the switch out of the question, hooked a non managed switch up while the internet was not working and tried to connect and got nothing as well.

Try the below and see whether that works
The inside interface of the PIX cannot be pinged from the other end of the tunnel unless the management-access command is configured in the global configuration mode.
PIX-02(config)#management-access inside
PIX-02(config)#show management-access
management-access inside

MOTU Interface Issue: Audio Not Reading In Host Software

Greetings. I'm in need of help. I'm using my MacBook Pro for live studio recording and it receives audio from a MOTU UltraLite Mk3 Hybrid Interface via Firewire cable.
The Audio Reads in the System Preferences Sound Input Level Monitor But Not in Host Software.
Although the audio signal from my mixer is making it to the interface (can see levels)and the audio from the interface is making it to the computer (can see on system preferences "Sound" input level monitor)it is not being read on any host software I've tried which includes: AudioDesk 3.02, Garageband, Cubase 4.1, Audacity, and Adobe SoundBooth CS3.
Note: Output (for playback) is set to go through the MOTU Interface and works well.
Here's an Overview of the machine's Hardware:
Model Name: MacBook Pro
Model Identifier: MacBookPro4,1
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 2.4 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 3 MB
Memory: 3 GB
Bus Speed: 800 MHz
Boot ROM Version: MBP41.00C1.B03
SMC Version (system): 1.27f3
Serial Number (system): W8*
Hardware UUID: 21BCA47D
Sudden Motion Sensor:
State: Enabled
Any advice is greatly appreciated. But please note that I've followed all instructions provided by Apple, MOTU, and all set-up instructions for host software and I've also disconnected the MOTU interface and recorded directly into the MBP and it worked fine.
< Edited by Host >

Well, it's nearly 2 years later... and this part of the problem mentioned in the link you provided is exactly what I'm experiencing!
Yea it is rather interesting from a couple of perspectives. One being that MOTU seems to be pretty diligent about their products and compatibility issues (just from reading through their "Tech Notes" at http://www.motu.com/techsupport/technotes.html). Also, I found that if you go to one of their product pages like "UltraLite-mk3 Hybrid Overview" (http://www.motu.com/products/motuaudio/ultralite-mk3) you can then click on the Tech Notes link (http://www.motu.com/products/motuaudio/ultralite-mk3/technotes.html)and that will narrow the results to Tech Notes that mention that specific product.
Researching off the tech notes and the info you provided, I did find other users with similar problems, but nothing really as conclusive as the link I suggested in the previous post. Also, of note, is that reading trough some of the search results, I realized the "whole ball of wax" can get quite complicated and goes well beyond my knowledge of the issue and the technology involved.
All that being said, have you tried contacting MOTU's tech support (http://www.motu.com/techsupport/)? Just by their documentation, they seem to be on the ball - might even have a ready answer. Like any vendor, they may have specific issues that they have not heard or dealt with before, but their website structure and content does seem to suggest they take an interest in getting their products to work across a myriad of tech environments and use cases.
Hope this helps.

OIM 9.1.0.2 - Interface issues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for