Operation Number in Result Recording

Dear QM Masters,
We are preparing BDC for result recording through QE11 as inspection lot will be with inspection points. Task list for specification will have same MIC assigned to two operation/phase i.e. phase 40 and phase 60. But as we have to record result for same characteristics twice at seperate work-center with seperate operation/phase number, which field we can take as primary key for operation identification as in QAMV table we dont have operation/phase fied. Can we use VORGLFNR field named as NODE of QAMV and if yes then what can be the logic?
Please help to find the solution as our developement is stopped because of this issue.
Any guidence will be great help and will be rewarded.
Thanks and regards,
Devang

Hi,
Step by step how to find the operation nos and characteristics nos.
1) From QALS table get the order number (AUFNR) for the field inspection lot no.(PRUEFLOS)
2) Go to table AFKO and give the input AUFNR (order no) which is got from QALS table. Find the field AUFPL from that AUFNR value from AFKO table.
3) Go to table AFVC and give the input AUFPL. You will get the AFVC-APLZL which is unique for each operation nos that is AFVC-VORNR. Now you have the APLZL from AFVC table.
4) Go to table QAMV and give the input inspection lot no (PRUEFLOS) and APLZL value in the field QAMV-VORGLFNR. Meaning AFVC-APLZL=QAMV-VORGLFNR. Fetch the characteristics nos that is QAMV-MERKNR.
I hope this will solve your problem.
Regards,
Manoj

Similar Messages

How to see MIC number in Result Recording Screen

Hi,
During result recording (thru QE51N/ QA32 ) in result recording screen we see MIC short text but not the MIC number.
How to get the MIC number during result recording screen?
Already we have used Info Field for this & get the MIC number Directly in result recording screen but User like to go for other option.
Thanks in advance.

I think you wont get MIC no instandard SAP

Serial Number wise Result Recording

Hi QM Gurus,
My Client requirement is he wants inspect the goods serial number wise.
Example: Product P0001 production entry 100nos with serial number like s001, s002, s003, s004, u2026u2026u2026u2026 s100.
But same thing Quality people has to record the result serial number wise.
How to map in SAP, Kindly help me.
Thanks in Advance.
Babusingh.S

Hi,
Results recording for units to be inspected (with serial number profile)
When you record inspection results for a unit to be inspected, for which the maintenance of serial numbers is specified in the material master, you must use the predefined serial numbers.
To record results for units to be inspected with a serial number requirement, the following conditions must be met:
The material was assigned a serial number profile and the serializing procedure was defined for maintaining inspection lots.
You have set the indicator for single unit inspection in the QM inspection setup of the material master.
Sanjay

In-process inspection- operation wise result recording sequence

Hello Everyone,
I have just come across a requirement and would be grateful if someone can help me out in this regard.
1.     This is make to stock discrete manufacturing scenario.
2.     Inspection type 03 has been activated in material master.
3.     The setting in OPK4 are, error if no inspection results exist and error when operation sequence is not adhered to.
4.     As a result of which I cannot confirm the operation in CO11N unless result recording is done for corresponding operation.
The requirement,
1.     User should not be able to carry out result recording for operation 30 unless at least 1 quantity of operation 20 (preceding operation) is confirmed. Likewise it should behave for rest of the operations.
2.     Practically material is processed for operation 30 only if 20 is confirmed. Therefore operation 30 should be inspected after 20. System allows to input result recording for all the operations irrespective its confirmations.
Is there any standard solution for this or should I go for any exit?
Thank you,
Anand Rao

Hi Sujit,
Thanks for so prompt response.
I am using inspection point 100. Still it is not restricting. The operation confirmation is done through CO11N and not feasible for users to perform it through QM module.
The logic is, if I try to carry out result recording for operation 30 , system should firstly check whether any confirmation number exists or (at least 1 quantity is confirmed)for previous operation i.e. 20. If not it must stop doing RR for 30 operation.
Whether exits QEEM0011 and QEEM0015 can restrict this, as by their description I think these work after entering RR. Here it is required before RR. Any guesses?
Thank you again for your kind reply.
Regards,
Anand
An addition,
Even though QEEM0011 works before valuation user is able to enter RR. The requirement is user should not enter the any RR irrespecive of valuation. If user enters RR and do not valuate it this exit may not work and eventually can allow to confirm OP30.
Edited by: Anand Rao on Aug 24, 2011 1:21 PM

Error in operation level result recording

Hi,
I need held; result recording of inspection type =03 (operation level Quality inspection)
A product manufacture via three operations (10, 20, 30)
All operation quality inspection active let operation no-10, all products reject and confirm as rework.
Next operation level quality record is done but confirmation not allow Reason is operation -10, rework quantity, (Actual quantity is more than planned quantity)
How to add the quantity after reworks for next operation quality inspection?
Pl helps me finding the solution.

Hi,
As per your more clearence , As per Example production order Quanity =1, passes 3 operation10,20,30
Operation=10 require rework as per quality ,
Operation =20 system raise the error message = Operation =10 rework .
If want to operation =10 ok Quantity =1 then system raise error messges =Actual quanity more than planned Quanitity
( 1 Rework + 1 Ok ) .
Supose rework order create and confirm then next 20 & 30 operation how complete .
Real scenerio :- Rework on operation =10 then again Quality check then goes to 20 operation Quality check pass / Rework if rework then again quality pass then goes to next operation level
I hope under stand my problem
Need help- please

Displaying operation long text in results recording screen

Hi, all!
I am trying to understand why I cannot display the operation long text when in results recording screen (either QE51N or QE01 transaction will not support displaying of operation long text).
I have checked all areas that I could think of in config to see if there is a display setting that will require to be activated and I could not find anything under Results recording, Inspection planning or General settings. I also tried to see if user settings may be making a difference and it did not. The SAP Help portal when talking of long texts available in results recording lists the following: Long texts for inspection lot, inspection method and inspection charcateristic. Nothing about operation long text.
However, the text is printed on the inspection instruction standard form.
SAP Notes has nothing on the subject that I could find.
So, as a last resort, I would like to ask if any other Quality Management specialist came across this and spent any time in determining if this can be done and why the information would not be displayed standard in the transactions. My client would prefer not to have to print the instructions in order to see the entire text. However, I do not see any standard way to have it displayed.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you in advance!

Hi Senthil,
Don't know it will help or not. But if your MIC is qualitative then you can use the long text of catalog code in QS42.
Please refer below screen,
Click on the which help to maintain the long text.
Regards,
Sandip

Printing or downloading individual operation results recording in in-proces

Hi, pls advise the t-code that is reqquired to print or download particular operation results recording values in in-process insp?

Goto QA11 or Qa12 selection inspection point Tab select operation go to partial lots u got the standard report.
or u want specific operation wise report sit with ur technical guy and start development.if any query revert me back
Edited by: Lakshmiananda prasad on Sep 12, 2009 8:11 AM

How to get total number of result count for particular key on cluster

Hi-
My application requirement is client side require only limited number of data for 'Search Key' form total records found in cluster. Also i need 'total number of result count' for that key present on the custer.
To get subset of record i'm using IndexAwarefilter and returning only limited set each individual node. though i get total number of records present on the individual node, it is not possible to return this count to client form IndexAwarefilter (filter return only Binary set).
Is there anyway i can get this number (total result size) on client side without returning whole chunk of data?
Thanks in advance.
Prashant

user11100190 wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for suggesting a soultion, it works well.
But apart from the count (cardinality), the client also expects the actual results. In this case, it seems that the filter will be executed twice (once for counting, then once again for generating actual resultset)
Actually, we need to perform the paging. In order to achieve paging in efficient manner we need that filter returns only the PAGESIZE records and it also returns the total 'count' that meets the criteria.
If you want to do paging, you can use the LimitFilter class.
If you want to have paging AND total number of results, then at the moment you have to use two passes if you want to use out-of-the-box features because LimitFilter does not return the total number of results (which by the way may change between two page retrieval).
What we currently do is, the filter puts the total count in a static variable and but returns only the first N records. The aggregator then clubs these info into a single list and returns to the client. (The List returned by aggregator contains a special entry representing the count).
This is not really a good idea because if you have more than one user doing this operation then you will have problems storing more than one values in a single static variable and you used a cache service with a thread-pool (thread-count set to larger than one).
We assume that the aggregator will execute immediately after the filter on the same node, this way aggregator will always read the count set by the filter.
You can't assume this if you have multiple client threads doing the same kind of filtering operation and you have a thread-pool configured for the cache service.
Please tell us if our approach will always work, and whether it will be efficient as compared to using Count class which requires executing filter twice.
No it won't if you used a thread-pool. Also, it might happen that Coherence will execute the filtering and the aggregation from the same client thread multiple times on the same node if some partitions were newly moved to the node which already executed the filtering+aggregation once. I don't know anything which would even prevent this being executed on a separate thread concurrently.
The following solution may be working, but I can't fully recommend it as it may leak memory depending on how exactly the filtering and aggregation is implemented (if it is possible that a filtering pass is done but the corresponding aggregation is not executed on the node because of some partitions moved away).
At sending the cache.aggregate(Filter, EntryAggregator) call you should specify a unique key for each such filtering operation to both the filter and the aggregator.
On the storage node you should have a static HashMap.
The filter should do the following two steps while being synchronized on the HashMap.
1. Ensure that a ConcurrentLinkedQueue object exists in a HashMap keyed by that unique key, and
2. Enqueue the total number count you want to pass to the aggregator into that queue.
The parallel aggregator should do the following two steps while being synchronized on the HashMap.
1. Dequeue a single element from the queue, and return it as a partial total count.
2. If the queue is now empty, then remove it from the HashMap.
The parallel aggregator should return the popped number as a partial total count as part of the partial result.
The client side of the parallel aware aggregator should sum the total counts in the partial result.
Since the enqueueing and dequeueing may be interleaved from multiple threads, it may be possible that the partial total count returned in a result does not correspond to the data in the partial result, so you should not base anything on that assumption.
Once again, that approach may leak memory based on how Coherence is internally implemented, so I can't recommend this approach but it may work.
Another thought is that since returning entire cached values from an aggregation is more expensive than filtering (you have to deserialize and reserialize objects), you may still be better off by running a separate count and filter pass from the client, since for that you may not need to deserialize entries at all, so the cost on the server may be lower.
Best regards,
Robert

RESULTS RECORDING WITH FREE TEXT IN QUALITY MANAGEMENT

Hi,
How can I give free text of 300 chars In results recording? For a process order with batch number & recipe, (in which master inspection characteristics are mentioned which are linked to general characteristics.)
I created characteristics (type CHAR)(which can be used as free text in results recording ) I have created class, assigned chars to class & finally to material. Also assigned MIC to this class chars.
When I do results recording I need to have these characteristics to be display as free text of 30character width. But since I have to give selected set for this general chars.(which is the system requirement) I have given selected set while creation of characteristics.
Due to this I can only select the codes from the selected set. Is there any process in which I can write free text up to 30 cars during results recording in quality module? & those characteristics I want to assign to MIC so that when process order is executed the first operation of quality can be done for RR.
With Regards,
Kareena

Hi Kareena,
All of first let me make it clear, if you will assign a Class Characteristic to the MIC, then it will become either Qualitative or QNT.
Now toeards your questions solution.
Option:-1
As suggested by Venkatr, make the control indicator "Docu. Req" in the MIC control indicator set, page:-2. for the line item of MIC in the insepction plan.
So, the system will prompt you a message to insert a text as described by Venkat, where you can enter the Long text also (Check the button available in the lower part of that small window)
Option:-2
Create a document type for this purpose, and assign a file, having 300 char. to the MIC, with the help of the "Object Link" function of SAP, avaialble with RR screen also.
Reagrds,
Shyamal

Result recording - Integration with external software

Hi,
Inspection is done using the external software & the results are stored in the external database.
How can we transfer the inspection results in QM Result recording?

Hi,
For the upload to the SAP-System, the function module BAPI_INSPOPER_RECORDRESULTS will be used with the following mandatory input parameters:
-     Inspection lot number
-     Inspection operation number
-     Inspection point number
-     Partial lot number
-     (SAP-)batch number
-     Characteristic results (for characteristics with summarized result recording)
-     Single results (for characteristics with original result recording).
The transfer between subsystem and QM is done asynchronously. The mapped result data will be send as IDoc to the SAP system, or via direct call of the BAPI_INSPOPER_RECORDRESULTS via RFC.
If the data is send as IDoc, the BAPI-ALE interface must be setup to process the BAPI_INSPOPER_RECORDRESULTS at receipt of a new IDOC.
Kindly contact with your ABAP'er for further process.
Thanks & Regards,
Srinivas.D

Lock in the results recording in QE51

Hi,I use a BAPI to do results recording in QE51,but when someone inside the characteristic,results recording does not happen, and there is no error message appears.What should I do to deal with the problem? Should I use 'lock object' method? I know nothing about 'lock', would you please tell me the method in detail?
For example,the inspection lot number is: 10000006313, the operation number is:0080 and the inspection characteristic number is:0010, I am inside this characteristic,but I want to do results recording using a BAPI.Results recording doesn't happan,and there is no error message appears.How can I deal with the problems.Many thanks!

CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_EQAVO'

Error - Single Result recording - BAPI_INSPOPER_RECORDRESULTS

Dear All ,
I need your expertise guidance on the below issue that i am facing in the BAPI - BAPI_INSPOPER_RECORDRESULTS
I am using this bapi to record result for inspection lot   with the inputs as below -
Import    -   INSPLOT -    Lot number
                  INSPOPER - Inspection Operation Number
Table   -     SINGLE_RESULTS - RES_VALUE - " some value "
I need the above data to be updated against Inspection lot number .   I think it can be done through BAPI , as BDC recording is having some issue when i tried to do this through BDC .
After executing this BAPI i am getting the return code message - "Defects occured during confirmation"
Can any one please guide me on the same how ishould proceed .
Thanks in advance .
Prabhudutta

Hello
Check this link: https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Snippets/SampleCodeBAPI_INSPOPER_RECORDRESULTS
It is working example for your requirement.

Reverse the result recording in QM

What is the process of cancel the result recording in stage of INSP RREC SPQR lot statuse in SAP QM.

Hi,
Just go to QE12..Result Recording changes for the inspection point. Enter the inspection lot, operation number and the sample number.
The next screen will show the results. Click on the option "Put to Process" The status will change from 5 "Processing completed" to 2 "Inprocess". Then remove the result for that characteristic and save it. Automatically your result recording will be reversed.
Please ask me if you need any other details.
Regards,
Srinivas.D

Results recording

Hi all,
In "In-process" inspection (03), while doing the results recording, system gives the following information.
The previous operation has not yet been confirmed
Message no. QT215
This is an INFORMATION message. Client requirement is to get an ERROR message here, as PP user has not confirmed the previous operation. Please guide me.
Best Regards
Sam

Dear Sam
There is no standard solution for the same nor there is any possiblity of converting the message into error. You will have to do a development.
My suggestions for the development are
1) BADI : while saving Result Recording : QE_SAVE
If message QT 215 is getting triggered during saving the result recording convert the message into Error or give an error message so that result recording is not saved.
Or
2 ) Use the same BADI
Get the order Number AUFNR by passing Inspection lot number in QALS. Table
Pass Order Number to CAUFV Table to get Group (PLNNR)
Pass PLNNR in PLPO Table to get Control key STEUS = QM control key and the corresponding Operation Number VORNR. Check for the operation prior QM control key . Pass the VORNR and order Number A in AFRU table.
If there is an entry in the table then allow Save otherwise error message not allow Save.
Hope this helps
Regards
gajesh

Results Recording Work List By Work Centre

Experts,
My Inspection Plans have two work centres.
Can I run a report which lists how many results (not UD) each work centre has recorded on a particular day?
Thanks
Welshy

Hi,
Quite unique and interesting!
As per my knowledge there is no specific standard report for this. You may have to go with work around- Z report for this. I do have a suggestion. Just check whether feasible.
1.     The date on which result recording is carried out gets stored in QAMR table. The field is QAMR-ERSTELLDAT.
2.     Work centers 2 in number, means you are dealing with 2 operations.
3.     The main task here I think, is to correlate inspection lot number with its work centers which is quite cumbersome, even if you try to link QALS, PLPO, CRHD tables with each other.
4.     Node number in table QAMR (field VORGLFNR) is nothing but operation number. Instead of work center if you go with operation number as input, may serve the purpose.
5.     Give input as inspection lot number, date of result recording QAMR-ERSTELLDAT and operation (optional)
6.     For the given input date if you find any data in QAMR, you may conclude RR is carried out on this date.
7.     Rest of the details (material code, material description, vendor etc) you can very well fetch once you know inspection lot number.
Regards,
Anand Rao

Operation Number in Result Recording

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for