Populating with holding tax part in WITH_ITEM using RFBIBL00
Hi all,
While handling with hold tax part during FB01 UPLOAD using RFBIBL00- DIRECT INPUT METHOD,i assigned WITHT, WT_WITHCD AND WT_QSSHB values to BWITH,and the tax part gets calculated and updating bseg table, but the tax part is not getting updated in WITH_ITEM TABLE,
can any help me out in this regard, its on high priority.
Regards
suresh
From the documentation of RFBIBL00:
Extended withholding tax functions:
Only transactions FB01 and FBV1 are supported for the extended withholding tax functions. Direct input is not supported.
The withholding tax data for BWITH must be transferred for every customer/vendor line item. The withholding tax data must come after the BBSEG data. A BWITH structure must be transferred for each withholding tax type.
Rob
Similar Messages
-
Calculation of with holding tax
The requirement goes like this.
We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.Hi,
i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
Best regards. -
How to caculate with holding tax using vendor number
Dear All,
I need to calculate and simulate the with holding tax amount before the FI document post. input should be the vendor number fisical year and the company code and the with hoding tax base abount. plz help me to do this
regard
nawaHello,
For a record in BBSEG you can have multiple records in the data file which corresponds to Structure BWITH which allows more than one value for field WT_WITHCD. For ex:
BBKPF
Field1 Field2
a bb
x yy
BBSEG
Field1 Field2 Field3
a bb ccc
x yy zzz
BWITH
Field1 Field2 Field3 WT_WITHCD
a bb ccc WT_WITHCD1
a bb ccc WT_WITHCD2
a bb ccc WT_WITHCD3
x yy zzz WT_WITHCD7
x yy zzz WT_WITHCD8
x yy zzz WT_WITHCD9
Hope this gives you some help to proceed further.
Best Regards, Murugesh AS -
Reg: Correction of Wrong With holding tax amount Values Posted via BAPI
Hello Experts,
I have posted some invoices using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST with With holding tax code and amount now the thing is that ..the document is posted successfully with Wrong With hoding tax amount data in TABLE WITH_ITEM due to this while executing t-code F-53 ( Outgoing payments ) its not calculating the with holding tax amount for the invoice .
Now i wan't to correct ( Negate some values) the values in WITH_ITEM table.....
How am i going to do it..!
Plz..experts help.
Plz waiting for your inputDear All,
this is not an error but the Standard System Design. Please read the note 611844. Only if You insert manually the WT amounts during the posting You will see them into the WT TAB after the posting. If You make the System to calculate the WT Aamounts automatically, no WT amounts will be reported into MIRO/MIR4. You can see them into the follow on document.
I hope this helps.
Mauri -
Customer master with holding tax data
Hi,
I am working on customer master transaction 'XD01'. I want add new fields to the existing subscreen 'with holding tax' and new fields in the new subscreen. There is no enhancement is available for this, but there a BADI 'CUSTOMER_ADD_DATA_CS'. But with this we can not update the data to table KNBW(with holding tax data). Can anybody worked on this type of requirements.
Thanks in Advance
Rajavardhana ReddyHi Rajavardhana
Here there two interfaces you can use for transfering data to database and getting data from database.
SET_DATA Data Transfer
GET_DATA Transfer Data
Hope this helps you.
Cheers
Manohar -
With Holding Tax provided in IDOC FIDCC2 is not getting updated in Acc Doc
Hi All,
I am Posting a Accounting document in R/3 though Idoc FIDCCP02.
This idoc has With holding Tax info segment as E1FIXWT. i gave all the info in this segment, like Tax code, Tax type , Withholding tax base amount (local currency) , Withholding tax base amount in document currency, Withholding tax amount (in local currencyand Withholding tax amount in document currency
However, when the Idoc gets posted,and the accounting document gets generated the With holding tab does not get populated in SAP.
Please let me know your inputs, that why the woth holding tab is not getting populated with the relevant info from Idoc.
Thanks in advanceHi,
I have the same issue. But as the idoc is generated in a SAP system of the same release I would have expected that the withholding tax data is already complete. Also are no withholding tax info populated in IT_ACCTX. There only VAT is visible. I suppose IT_ACCWT was meant.
Anyone any idea?
Regards
Stefanie -
Hi,
If i select With holding tab when entering Down payment request,Down payment and invoice for vendor, i am getting error message as Withholding Tax information missing from line item
Could you advise me where i made wrong cogfiguration for with holding tax.
Your immediate response will be highly appreciated.
With regards,
V.KHi
Check Feild status group of G067 in OB14 and make sure that these are optional and also the Feild status group of WHT GL accounts you have assigned.
There is always a possibility that these are in suppressed state.
Award points if useful.
sarma -
WITH HOLDING TAX ON DOWN PAYMENT
HI
I am using TCode F-47 for down payment request to be paid to vendor. In Vendor Master Record with holding tax information is activated. But at the time of processing payment against down payment request using TCode F-58 With holding tax not deducted and full down payment requested amount getting debited to vendor.
Pl suggest me
Message was edited by:
Chandrakant.K AcharyaHi Chandrakanth
u check once WHT settings at WHT type for Payment posting.here you remove inherit base option. for Cess claculating on TDS.
you check once define WHT codes for cess. here you calculate for 1% cess 0.022 % on TDS base amount or invoice amount. ex: inv: 100 , TDS 2.2 %. Cess 1% on 2.2% means 0.0220. like that you calculate.
Then you update cess tax codes in FK02,here u select liability option.
Then you can use f-47. here system showing popup with Base amount,TDS & cess codes.then you save it.
now you check with f-58. other wise you want temporly solution. go to FB02 change doc. there you can modify WHT amounts then save it.
ok all the best
Raj -
With holding tax decuction from T.Code F-02 with out sp. gl indicator
Hi All,
While making the payt to service vendor my client do not want to use the functionality of advance payt, which can be performed through T.code F-48. They wants to treat this advance payt as a normal payt to vendor but they want to deduct the with holding tax from this payt.
I have tries to use T.code F-02 with posting keys 25 Dr Vendor & 50 cr Bank. But when i am using this posting key for vendor (i.e.25) System gives me warning message saying with holding tax information is ignored & system do not deduct TDS from the payt made to vendor.
But when i am using PK 29 with sp gl indicator A for advances from T.Code F-02 system allows me to deduct the with holding tax against vendor paytment.
Please guide me how to duduct the with holding tax from vendor payt. without using sp. GL indicator for advances.
Thanks
SonalHi
why ur clien not want advance paymeny through Special GL, what is the issue/purpose
see TDS deducted at the time of Advance payment and at the time of invoice
when u use F-02 for TDS deduct of vendor without using special GL and u useing 25 vendor and 50 bank
in this case tds not deducted here vendoir is debit but withouse advance indicator
becuase u given vendor advance , but in this case entry not showing advance or
in SAP Standard system TDS deducted of advance payment when u using 29 posting key for vendor this is stsndard key of advance vendor
so convience ur clien u use Advance payment method with Special GL, if they not agree then ask what is the purpose u not using Speacial GL through Advance paument
if any query, revert back
Regards
Roobal -
Dear Sapgurus,
we are using 2 different with holding tax type one is at the time of inv posting and 2nd is payment posting which is earlier, we had created tax types and tax codes we assigned in vendor master assgined to company code and automatic posting also, finally if any vendor pay advance then we calculate tds it will post to tds g/l account, after that in sap any option how to file the tds returns.
Regards
VeeruDear,
Once you have posted TDS then usually at the month end you will run below transaction to complete the process..
1. Use transcation J1INCHLN (this will club all TDS posted per section and paid)
2. Use transaction J1INBANK (when you make TDS payment in Bank then bank will give you challan number which you have to update in the system)
3. Use transaction J1INCERT (this will print the vendor certificate (this is usually an year end practice)
4. Use transaction J1INMIS (this will provide consolidated report for TDS)
Regards,
Chintan Joshi -
With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term
Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PMDear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15% = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20% = $ 20,000 ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20% = $ 20,000 ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar -
With holding tax tab not showing up in MIRO
Hi,
Im trying to do a MIRO for a vendor which requires with holding tax. The setting in done in the vendor master.However while doing MIRO, the with holding tax tab does not show up.
Does anyone know why with holding tax tab is not showing up in MIRO and what needs to be done.
PS: It is set up correctly in the vendor master and it works and shows up while doing FI transactions.
ThanksHello Shruti,
Kindly check if on the vendor master, on withholding tax tab, checkbox "liable" has been ticked.
Also kindly check the reconciliation account defined in the vendor master and compared in GL master record, FS00, should have a field status group of G067- Reconciliation Accounts or its equivalent in case you don't use standard SAP field status grouping.
And also check on the MRIO screen, have you checked "calculate tax" under general tab.
Hope it will help you
Thanks
Para -
GL account wise With Holding Tax
Dear All,
We would like to know, is there any table where we will able to get the data for gl code wise document numbers along with with holding tax code.
Regards
AnilkumarHi
I have gone through "BSEG" and "With_Item". I am not able to find the with holding tax data in "Bseg", where as in "with_item", there is no information for GL account
Is there any other table ?
Regards
Anilkumar -
Hi all,
I have an issue relating to with holding tax. wtax code is not picking the percentage ammount while doing the transaction.Please provide the solution.
Regards,
Suma.What r u doing Invoicing or Advance payment. Pls chk in Config whether u have maintained percentage for that particular Tax code
SPRO
Financial Accounting --> Financial Accounting Global Settings -->
Withholding Tax --> Extended Withholding Tax --> Calculation --> Withholding Tax Code --> Define Withholding Tax Codes
And chk in Vendor Master also whether they have maintained any Exemption code or percentage.
If this information is useful. Pls assign Points -
T code fbl3n , adding output field is with hold tax code.
hai experts ,
tcode is fbl3n.
adding new field is with hold tax code in output fields..
inpu field is gl account number and company code and psting date.
but in report bsis table data is come, but this not properly assiging to output display structure.
but i find out some badis like 1. FI_ITEMS_MENUE01
2. FI_ITEMS_MENUE02
3. FI_ITEMS_CH_DATA
4. BADI_LAYER
but these badis not working properly.
but i develop some implimentation enhancement frame work , but inthis point , cursor will comes to enhancement block but not move step by step code..
please solve.
thanks in advance.Hi,
To add new fields in the out put for the transaction FBL3N Use BTE.
Read the documentation first..
Go to Tcode FIBF =>Environment=>Info system(P/S)=>F8=>Select the event 00001650=>Click on documentation
1. Extend the structure RFPOSX and RFPOS with a new append structure.
2. Run the RFPOSXEXTEND report.
3. Create BTE 1650 (Business Transaction Event). For this purpose, copy the sample function module SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001650 into the customer namespace.
4. Activate the module in transaction FIBF. Go to 'Settings -> Products -> ... of a customer' and create a product. You can choose the name of the product and the description. Set the 'Active' indicator and save.
5. Go to 'Settings -> P/S Modules -> ... of a customer' and include an entry for event 00001650 with your new product and function module. Save the entry.
Regards
DKS
Maybe you are looking for
-
What is the diffrence between External postings and Internal postings in CO
Dear all, Can brief me anyone about the Externa postings and Internal postings in CO, I suspected all postings from outside or interface postings is External postings and all FI postings is internal postings, Is it true or not still i am suspecting,
-
I forgot my iPod pass code how do I change it using my iPad
I forgot my iPod pass code how do I change it without my PC since it broke
-
T510 not connecting to apple 30' display through mini dock
I am having some difficulties connecting my T510 (NVS 3100m) though my thinkpad mini dock plus series 3 (4338). I am using dvi cable. So far, the only resolution i am capable of is 1280x800.... instead of 2560x1600. Any suggestions? If possible, i wo
-
Has anybody experience problem with the java policy setting using the latest java plugin (1.4.2_03) for IE? I have a simple applet to that performs local file io, and grant all the File permission to the codebase, but it doesn't work. It will work if
-
RV016 - DHCP - Assign another Default Gateway IP
Maybe this is a simple issue for you but i couldnt solve it. I am using a RV016 (192.168.1.2) as a router and DHCP. It automatically assigns its own IP which is 192.168.1.2 as a default gateway. And I can not set my RV016 to assign a static another D