Org unit of a position

Hi all,
I want to find out the organizational unit for the given position in OM. Also, i want to find out the manager of this position.
Any solution....?
Regards,
Shanthi

You can Check PP01 TCode - Relations. (or table HRP1001)
OU of a Position can be found by Belongs to Relation between OU and Position.
For Manager of OU - Check the Relationship Manages
Also in TCODE PPOME for the OU find the position with a Hat which indicates the Manager of the OU

Similar Messages

Report to check org units without any position display

Dear All,
I want a report which i can see only the org units in a graphical way. When i am checking through Simple maintainence mode I am getting org units along with positions also with in the graphical mode i have selected the view option under options menu there can able to see individual departments along with positions.
My request is i want to see the organization structure along with sub org units under sub org units with departments without positions. please let me know is there any standard reports available.
Regards,
HR user

Yes, the Report is
S_AHR_61016493-Organizational Structure-Organizational Structure
Select the first line and press F8

No entries for org unit, job or position in T5KWB

Hi Experts,
I am running payroll for canada , i am getting this error for 2 employees for whom the org assignment been chaged recently -
now they are giving , kindly help me - i have checked this table T5KWB and it dosnet hold value maintained for org unit
50737186
KTXDM Canadian Tax Infotypes Data Management
Input
P0461
P0462
P0463
P0464
Processing
No entries for org unit, job or position in T5KWB
Search in organization structure failed
Check T5KWB for org unit 50737186 or higher-level org unit for 20101031
Thanks
Jay

Hi Jay
Get the position of the employees for whom you are getting the error message and maintain infotype "Canada Groups for WCB" for those positions. This should solve your issue.
You may want to go through below link:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM/WCB
Hope this helps
Best Regards
Reddy

Actions for Org.Units, Jobs and Positions

Dear All,
I know how to create or copy the available actions for Org Units , Jobs and positions thro' the table T777M and run them through PP03.
Once I do it , when I want to skip some of the relationships it doesnt allow me to , the next page tab is grayed out.
I mean if we have for ex. a position reporting to a position and because he is, say CEO and I want to skip that relationship I am unable to , how to activate the skip or Next page tab ??
Regards
Uday

Hi,
Goto table T77IV click on maintain, Click on New Entries >> Enter the subgroup ( PVOB) PV - Plan Verson and OB is for Object you want to maintain the number ranges for eg : 01C for Job. >> Enter and save the record...
It will take u to the next screen >> Click on maintain intervals >> Click on Add Intervals >> New screen will appear ... enter the details as below :
NO From Number To Number Remarks
01 1 19999999 This is Object range
Note : do not enter anything in "Current Number" & Do not select "Ext"
I hope this will help you....
regards,
Navinkumar

Report for Org units with no positions

Hi
I am searchign for a report through which I can find all org units whcih have no positions assgiend.
Please suggest.
Thansk
Regards
RKGSAP

HI,
follow the path -
SAP Easy Acces->Human Resources->Organizational management->Info system->Organization Unit->Organization Structure
Here you have the SAP query, execute the one that ftis in your requirement.
Also check the same in the Position node. Explore the 'report Structure' node as well.
Thanks & REgards, SWapnil Mishra

Display positions in Org unit sorted by Position Desc

Hi All,
Can you please let me know how the positions in an Org unit can be displayed in sorted order by position description? Like in PPOME when you display/change an Org unit we should be able to see similar positions displayed together in sorted order based on their description and not the eight digit object id.
Thanks!
Sandeep

Hello Sandeep,
Unfortunately the only standard functionality is to change the rankings of the positions within transaction ppome. Therefore you have the buttons 'Move up in rank' and 'Move down in rank' in the overview area of the ppome. As you know if the field PRIOX in the table hrp1001 is empty, the transaction sorts the positions by OBJID. So perhaps you could create a abap program to change this standard functionality to insert values into field PRIOX for the corresponding relationship in HRP1001 that you want to sort.
Best Regards
Christine

Org unit changes but position not when emp move from 1 org unit 2 other

Hi,
We have a scenario in which when an employee moved from org unit to another (temporarily) his position doesn't get changed but org. unit changes. How to manage it???
Thanks in advance
Anand

Hi Naveen,
Let me expain the process in details when you enter "Position" in IT 0000 & 0001 in Emp. Master (PA30) it inherites Org. Unit, Org Key and Cost Center. To get inheritance of org unit, org key, cost center along with position you have to assign all to org. unit in PPOM.
I want "Position" to be remained unchanged when an employee moves from one org unit to other only organization unit need to be changes.
Please suggest
Thanks a lotttttttt

Number range for Org.Units, Jobs and position

Hi,
Can someone guide me on how to create number range for Org. Units from say 10000000 (My org unit series should start with 1xxxxxxx), Jobs 20000000 and Positions from 30000000. Step by step would be helpful.
Also any link to any document would be appreciated
Regards
Uday

Hi,
Goto table T77IV click on maintain, Click on New Entries >> Enter the subgroup ( PVOB) PV - Plan Verson and OB is for Object you want to maintain the number ranges for eg : 01C for Job. >> Enter and save the record...
It will take u to the next screen >> Click on maintain intervals >> Click on Add Intervals >> New screen will appear ... enter the details as below :
NO From Number To Number Remarks
01 1 19999999 This is Object range
Note : do not enter anything in "Current Number" & Do not select "Ext"
I hope this will help you....
regards,
Navinkumar

Missing position and Org Unit relationship in PO13

Hello SAP Pundits,
I created a Position 1234 with transaction PPOM with Org Unit A and Job code X with start date 01/01/2009
Now I hire an employee XYZ with this position X from start date 01/01/2009.
When I go and see position X in PO13 it shows following relationships
1)     Position 1234 - Org Unit A from 01/01/2009 to 31/12/9999
2)     Position 1234 u2013 Job Code X from 01/01/2009 to 31/12/9999
3)     Position 1234 u2013 Person XYZ from 01/01/2009 to 31/12/9999
Perfect till now.
Now if I change the Org Unit of the Position 1234 from A to B from date 01/04/2009 using PO13.
A new record is created in IT0001 with start date 01/04/2009 and previous record is delimited.
But now if I check the relationships in PO13 for position 1234 I donu2019t see the new record for Position 1234 and Org Unit B.
However the previous relationship between position 1234 and Org Unit A is delimited till 31/03/2009.
Why am I not able to see the assignment of Positon 1234 with new Org Unit B? Any reason why I am getting such an error?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ajay Hosur

When you have changed the Position 1234 to org Unit B from 01.04.2009 then the previous relationship will not show in po13, it goes into History which you can see in Complete Position Description..
goto pp01 and select that position and create relationship with Org Unit B... am not sure why in Infotype 0001, previous record get delimited and new record got created..

Head of the Position in an Org Unit

Hi Experts,
I have created a Org Unit and a Position under that.
Within this position i have assigned 4 users, but one of them is the head.
How can i differantiate a head from the others under the same Position ?
Any suggestions ?
Thank You.

Hi,
The Priority field is optional. It is used to determine the sequence in which objects are presented in Simple Maintenance and Structural Graphics.
When multiple objects are located on the same hierarchical level of a structure, these must be ordered in a specific sequence from left to right (or from top to bottom).
This is done by assigning alphanumeric priority values, where the value 1 is the highest (far left or top) and 99 the lowest priority (far right or bottom).
If you specify no priority, the system places objects according to their object IDs.
eg:
O 50004630 ABC          ABC test by nachy
        O 50004631 Is line supervisor of     Hr           Human resources
            O 50004632 Is line supervisor of     Payroll      Payroll
        O 50004634 Is line supervisor of     Time         Time Management
if you assign sequence no 01 to time and 02 to hr..
then
it iwll be like this
O 50004630 ABC          ABC test by nachy
        O 50004634 Is line supervisor of     Time         Time Management
        O 50004631 Is line supervisor of     Hr           Human resources
            O 50004632 Is line supervisor of     Payroll      Payroll
Note:do read the F1 help thst is little more clear..(above info is from f1 help)

Org Unit with more than one Chief Position

Hi,
we have implemented MSS via the portal using a one-to-one relationship between Org Units and Chief Positions, and we would now like to have multiple Chief positions attached to one Org Unit.
As far as I can tell from the SAP documentation, this should be straightforward, but the results we are getting do not seem correct.
I have an Org Unit that has position 1 and position 2 assigned to it with relationship A/B 012 denoting that they are Chief Positions.
User 1 is holder of position 1 and user 2 is holder of position 2.
Both users have the same security roles.
The views used on the portal are configured using the MSS Object and Data Provider functionality, using the standard ORGEH view, evaluation path for root objects SAP_MANG and evaluation path objects SBES. The checkbox 'Excl. Managers' is ticked.
The problem is this - both users can see all the subordinate employees in the Org Unit when they log on to MSS but user 1 can also see user 2 in his list of employees, which is not correct as user 1 and user 2 are both chiefs. User 2 cannot see user 1 in his list of employees, which we would expect.
The only logic we can see for user 1 being able to see user 2's details is that user 1 must be somehow defined as the 'superior' Chief Position, but we have not defined this as far as we know.
Any ideas as to why this is happening for us?
Many thanks,
Fran.

Hi Fran,
Sounds like you have set up the reporting structures and MSS properly. I do question why two chiefs for one org unit. As you stated, both can see all employees and so both can approve time, give pay increases, etc. without the approval of the other. If this is want you want, then you have set it up properly. Usually, one has to approve the actions of the other, thus, is in a superior relationship. This can be handled by having a higher level new org unit with the higher person as chief and the lower stay as head of the lower org unit which reports to it.
As you have it now, both individuals have the same rights and access. They should both be excluded from iViews if you checked the "Excl. Managers" box. Since, you just recently made one a manager, have you checked for any date dependencies? If the Chief #1 is selecting a view for "Current Year", for example, he would be able to see all persons who reported to him for this year, which includes Chief #2. There are no 'superior chief' designations (except by structure), so without being able to view your configuration, my suggestion is to check all dates for the assignments and relationships vs. dates of the view.

Org Unit Under Position

Hi,
Can we create an org unit under a position (other than chief position)
Eg: GM will be the top of the Company, under GM different departments, is it possible in OM..?
I would appreciate your help. Thanks!
SD.

Hi SD,
Functional units are reprseneted in OM.Please check allowed relationship per object type.tcode OOIT..Org units and Position relationship can be assimilated using this.
please check T778T,T777E(Table T777E contains all the relationships permitted between organizational objects)
Table T7791 contains information about which SAP organizational object types should be linked with positions, which with jobs and which with organizational units.
objects and relationships are building blocks of OM(1000 and 1001)
please refer to the below link for more details
https://cw.sdn.sap.com/cw/docs/DOC-39190
Hope this helps.
No Worries
KG

Changing personnel area/subarea (IT1008) from org unit to position

We are live with PA and Org. Mgmt, but have been advised to change the infotype 1008 data - personnel area and subarea to be stored on the position instead of the org unit (where we have it now). A big reason for this is we have cases when we need to overwrite the personnel subarea at the position level. For example, a position belonging to an org unit with subarea ABCD, may really be in subarea WXYZ. Therefore, even though the org unit is ABCD, it will be overwritten at the position level to WXYZ. My understanding is that the RHINTE30 program will not work approrpiately if we are maintaining the data this way.
In transaction PPOME there is an account assignment tab on the org unit with cost center (filled in) and personnel area/subarea (which will be blank moving forward since that data won't be maintained on the org unit). Then, there is also an account assignment tab on the position with cost center inherited from the org unit (sometimes needing to be overwritten at the position level), and the personnel area/subarea data. My question is how should I handle the view of PPOME for this data? Can I hide the personnel area and subarea on the account assignment tab for the org units only so it is not confusing for the users? The problem with having it this way is that personnel area and subarea are blank on the org unit and filled on on the position. They are conflicting and both visable/maintainable to the User. Any advise please? Thanks!

Hi Nish,
I gave you my input on your other related message and now will go for this one.
As I commented on the other message, RHINTE30 will not integrate infotypes 1008 and 1013. So you don't have to worry about using this functionality (first part of your message).
On the second part (personnel area / subarea on position rather than org unit): there are some considerations here that are more functional / process driven than technical. From a technical point of view, everything can be done. You can hide data from infotype 1008 on the tabstrip for your org. unit using dynpro handling, even via customizing. You can even transfer the data from infotype 1008 on the org. units to the positions or delimit it on the org units. There are some quite easy ways of achieving this using the LMSW tool (have you used it? I can forward some documentation).
But personally, I would not recommend to do this from a process point of view. Everything in SAP HR is about the inheritance concept, and I think this works very well when it comes to org. units and positions. It is normally advisable to record personnel area / subarea on the org. unit level. This will be inherited by positions (even if you cannot see it at position level in PPOME) and thus defaulted for the employee. At position level you should handle only the exceptions, which will be in turn also defaulted for the employee holding the position. In this way, data maintenance is minimized. If you delete (or do not use from now on) information about infotype 1008 on org. unit level, your HR department will have to maintain this every time a position is created, and even in cases in which a position is shifted from one org. unit to another one.
In my opinion, you should address this with your HR department and explain the concept and the consequences of maintaining all at position level. It would only be advisable to do it if the org. unit structure is very cross-personnel areas and subareas. If it is a matter of handling exceptions, again, I would recommend to continue recording this data at org. unit level. All in all, if the data is not recorded on the position and you need to see which is its personnel area, you just need to double-click on the org. unit above.
Just wanted to let you know my opinion, of course it's your decision. By the way, I'm of course not aware of other possible implications like home-developed reporting and so on.
Regards,
Rodrigo

OM - Report S_AHR_61016509 Vacant Positions doesn't pull the Org Unit data

Hello,
When I run the report - S_AHR_61016509 Vacant Positions, it pulls all the vacant positions. But it does not pull the information on which Org Unit the vacant position belongs to.
The end user would like to know which org unit the vacant position belongs to in the org structure, so if there is a new hire in that org unit, we can reuse the same position.
Please guide.
Thanks in advance.
Madhu

Hi,
On the output, click on print preview button (ShiftF6). On the next screen, click on change layout button (CtrlF8). Select the 4 hidden fields and transfer them to the left pane and click on copy.
You can then transport the output as excel too.
Iu2019d recommend you to save the layout by going to Settings>Layout>Saving. You would then get an option on the report selection screen to specify the layout and you could save your variant accordingly.
Hope this helps.
Donnie

Retrieving Positions for Specific Org Units

Hi All,
I have a headcount report to develop. It will run for one personnel area at a time. So for the period run, I have to list out all the org units under the personnel area as well as the sub org units. For each of the org units I have to separate positions under them into two group - total of positions with holders and non-holders.
I am using the function RH_STRUC_GET by passing org unit to retrieve positions. May I know which result table to read in order to get positions and how to segregate them into 'With Holders' and 'Non-Holders'?
And also how to get the relation ship between org units because I need to display that in the report also.
Thank you in advance
Regards,
Lily

Hi..
Existing Organizational Units (Report RHXEXI00)
Staff Functions for Organizational Units (Report RHXSTAB0)
Organizational Structure with Persons (Report RHXSTR02)
Periods for Unoccupied Positions (Report RHFILLPOS)
Existing Positions (Report RHXEXI03)
Staff Assignments (Report RHSBES00)
Position Description (Report RHXDESC1)
Staff Functions for Positions (Report RHXSTAB1)
Vacant Positions (Report RHVOPOS0)
Obsolete Positions (Report RHVOPOS1)
Complete Position Description (Report RHXSCRP1)
Reporting Structure without Persons (Report RHSTR05)
Reporting Structure with Persons (Report RHSTR04)
Activity Profile of Positions (Report RHXSTR07)
Activity Profile of Positions with Persons (Report RHXSTR08)
Existing Objects (Report RHEXIST0)
Structure Display/Maintenance (RHSTRU00)
Reporting on an Infotype (Report RHINFAW0)
Starting an HR Report (Report RHPNPSUB)

Org unit of a position

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for