Organizational structure for MSS scenario

Hi!
I would like to set up the Organizational structure for MSS scenario within SAP Portal.
Question:
1) How to set up/map real user from SU01 to Manager? (tcode, report)
2) How to mark them as 'Chief' (tcode, report)
3) How to be sure that PA & OM are configured correctly and the integration switch is on?
Which SAP course or SDN blog describes this?
Thank you very much!
regards
Jürgen

Hi,
For MSS,
Perner have the chief position in organization structure   that you can create in transaction PP01 and for relation ship infotype you have tio create 012 relationship.
Infotype 0105 with subtype System User Name must exist
PLOGI ORGA Switch MUSt BE Activated
Regards,
Kapil

Similar Messages

  • Set up the Organizational structure for MSS scenario

    Hi!
    I would like to set up the Organizational structure for MSS scenario within SAP Portal.
    Question:
    1) How to set up/map real user from SU01 to Manager? (tcode, report)
    2) How to mark them as 'Chief' (tcode, report)
    3) How to be sure that PA & OM are configured correctly and the integration switch is on?
    Which SAP course or SDN blog describes this?
    Thank you very much!
    regards
    Jürgen

    How to be sure that PA & OM are configured correctly and the integration switch is on?
    Check It000 and IT0001 here u will get objects from OM and PA  (position ID , Job Key, organisational Key)
    and integration switch
    check plogi orga , plogi plogi , plogi perli  in V_T77s0
    Edited by: Sikindar on Feb 10, 2009 6:53 PM

  • Organization Structure for multiple countries

    Hi,
    We are setting up GLOBAL support organization. Our support organization includes following countries:
    1. China
    2. Japan
    3. Korea
    I am reading the SAP blog from forum. It says that,
    "Enter the necessary data in the address tab (City and Country). In the Function Tab, Select Service and Service Organization. In the Attributes Tabs, check for the attribute maintenance Scenario: Service that you have a value in the attribute Country. Be aware that the basic organizational determination process is based on the Country value. This means that all of your business partners should have the same value in this attribute. If you have more than one country then you should create several organizations".
    My query is:
    In my organization structure, it involves three countries (China, Japan & Korea). I have included all the three countries in a single organization structure. But as per the above statement, should i need to create three organization structure for three countries?
    Regards
    Kumar

    Hi Kumar,
    Sorry for late response: but the answer is no, only one structure for each country.
    Dr. Berg

  • How to modify organizational structure for workflow?

    Hi,
    What is the best practice for modifying the organizational structure for workflow? I know I can do all the changes in development and move it to production via transport system but is that always required.
    It seems tedious to transport the org plan from dev to prod every time there is a position change etc.
    And it does not allow you to change it in production since the client is locked.
    I don't even have all the users I have in production in my dev box so I can't assign the correct ones to positions. Would it mean I have to have the users in the dev box mirror the ones in production?
    Thank you,
    Sergiy

    This answer depends on the HR managment that you have there, if the HR area is a good coordinated area the best answer is to configure the system for automatic transports and pass the HR structures in this way, you can lock some dangerous infotypes in the T77TR tables and be sure that you will not have any trouble with that data. the best thing using this option is to have a specific DEV client to transport the HR structures.
    If you will not have any control between the Dev Environment changes and some people will modify in Prod and other people will make transports in a Dev environment, the best option is to open the client and modify the Org structures every time you need it.
    Refers to the SAP Press book Practical Workflow, section 5.4.2.
    Regards.

  • What are the central organizational structures for the following SAP applic

    What are the central organizational structures for the following SAP applications ?                                   
    a)     FI                              
    b)     SD                              
    c)     MM                              
    d)     CO                              
    thanks
    manoj

    hi,
    Inventry and Finance
    regards,
    varma

  • Organization structure for Case study .... need yr advice

    Hi …I am in process of preparing an org structure for one of the company.
    The company operations is like ….
    The company has four factories in different locations and have 3 Regional distribution centers (RDC) across india. Each distribution center has 5 branches (Sales Offices), in this way they 15 Sales offices across India.
    Most of the materials are procured by factories independently while some materials are centrally procured. Factories produce Finish goods and they are either sale to customer directly ( big regular customers) , or transferred to RDC to cater the requirements of other MID size customers and the other possibility to transfer it to Branches for Retail customers. RDCs also transfer FG to Branches.
    All factories , RDC and branches have warehouse facility , however branches have limited warehouse facility as the customers supported by them are very few and generally deliveries are made directly from RDC / Factory.
    They also have one R&D department in another location to develop new products and material is generally transferred from factories to R&D department.They also have one project division at the same (R&D) location which handles commissioning of new plants and procurement of capital goods.
    Raw Material , Semi finish and FG are transferred between factories and FG material is also transferred between RDCs.
    The group also has another Company which produces another line of products. RDCs and Branches of first company also work for second company (which means same RDC can store FG produced by both companies) and also Branches can also have FG material of both companies. Second company doesn’t have any specific R&D or capital division and R&D and capital of first company also work for second company.
    Inter company transfer between both companies is a regular practice.
    > Proposed Org structure
    Company – Group Company
    Company Code – First company and Second company
    Factory Configurations
    For first company
    4 Factories will be 4 plants
    Factories Structure (Storage locations / warehouses and storage type)
    Since factories have different type of material ( like FG , Raw material , WIP ) therefore I am confused what option I should select 
    1) 3 storage location ( for each plant) and one warehouse, 1 storage type
    2) 1 storage  location and three warehouses (I think this is not possible in SAP , not sure ?? )
    3) 1 storage location , 1 warehouse and 3 storage types
    RDC structure
    RDCs have full fledged warehouse facility and therefore thinking of making them also as Plant. Every RDC will have 6 Storage locations , 1 for First company RDC itself, 5 for associated branches and I feel each “RDC storage locations” should be a associated to a separate warehouse also.
    ( Since both companies produce different set of products therefore they will have different material and hence thinking of handling products of both companies in same plant and same storage location and warehouse , may be two storage type/area can be defined to differentiate material of both companies.)
    Branches: Will be storage locations under RDC …..
    While making branches as Storage location …. I have another question about valuation , since material from Plant and RDC is being transferred to Branches and  from there it is distributed to customers therefore the valuation of FG at BRANCH and RDC should be different as transportation cost , packing , unpacking etc cost should get added at Branch level.
    Therefore in case I make branch as Storage location , I will miss the valuation part while if I make them as Plant then there will be lot of documents get generated for each movement. Hence not sure for what option I should go.
    R&D:
    Since R& D department is involved in testing in New Product development and generally material is required to be scrapped after testing therefore thinking of making it as Plant with one storage location and may be here I don’t need any warehouse (WM) here.
    Project Division
    Project division may also be a separate plant with one storage location and NO WAREHOUSE is required to linked with it.
    Purchase Organizations
    4 purchase organizations for each plant respectively and 1 centralized purchase Org for central procurement.
    Your all valuable inputs are welcome .... looking foward to have a best possible configuration for above mentioned case study.
    Regards

    Phew... long long question
    The rule I generally follow is that the org structure should map reality.
    Company code - where Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss are prepared at the end of the year. If an entity does not do this, it is not a company code.
    Plant
    1) Each manufacturing facility is a plant (could be in 1 location or separate).
    2) Each separate location is a plant (even if it only stores goods). May be an overkill, but helps when legal requirements change or the location is upgraded.
    So in your case, RDC will be a plant (may be more than 1 if necessary). R&D should be a separate plant without warehouse management
    Storage location
    The only rule I follow is that there should not be any overlap of storage locations. So physically, any area of say 1 square foot should belong to one and only one storage location. Otherwise there is a lot of confusion during physical inventory. So logical locations are a no-no.
    I usually use a lot of storage locations.
    Don't have a warehouse spanning multiple plants (even though it is allowed).
    Purchasing organizations
    Have one for each location of purchase. If there is a team sitting in each plant procuring for only that plant, have it as a separate purchasing org (not strictly necessary, but makes authorization simple). For central purchasing, a central purchasing org should do nicely...
    Hope this helps,
    Lakshman

  • Organization structure for Inventory management

    Hi All,
    I am looking for organization structure specific to inventory management and also data flow architecture.
    If there is any standard org structure is available please share with me.
    Regards
    Vijay

    I am looking for organization structure specific to inventory management and also data flow architecture.
    > If there is any standard org structure is available please share with me.
    Hi Vijay,
    Standard Org Structure for IM starts with Plants and ends with Storage Locations. You can create required no of storage locations under your plants, where plants are assigned to company codes. Its always better to copy from master plant 1000/0001 while creating the plants where you can make changes during creation where required (factory calendar etc).
    All the material movements within the plant happen between storage locations, material-material, special stocks-unrestricted stocks with no accounting effect.
    Movements between the plants can be planned wrt your needs such as STO with no financial postings unless you have plant wise PCA
    You can follow the standard avaiable structure for your IM org structure.
    Regards
    Shiva

  • Organization Structure for Petro-oil business

    Hi experts,
    I'm a new consultant, and I'm implementing for a Oil & Gas Project. I want to ask you a recommendation about the solution for Organization structure.
    This business sell some kind of good:
    1) Hydro: mogas, diezel, mazut, kerosense...
    2) Non-Hydro: cement, Iron, gas, lubricant...
    I should use two org. structure for each kind, or just unique structure. Because each kind is controlled a different method, so I suggest use two org. structure, but its difficult for reporting.
    Plz help me.

    Hi Kumar,
    Sorry for late response: but the answer is no, only one structure for each country.
    Dr. Berg

  • Organization structure for real-estate project

    Hi
    I am required to work in a real-estate company project. 
    I am confused about the organization structure which should be created for the company.
    The company undertakes various projects like housing, shopping complexes, malls, wind-mills, etc.  and want to know the profitability reports of each individual project.  Every time  company will be starting new new construction activities.
    Please suggest an organization element how I can represent these in the Controlling Area and avoid number of GL accounts growing out of numbers.
    Points for helpful answers,
    Regards

    1. For Activating or Bring IS Retail Real Estate Module is there any additional user cost or license is required ?
    Hi  Jai
    Real estate module is not IS solution, licensing is normal for RE
    2. Is it possible to activate two industry solution in the same box ?
    yes you can with some small precations
    3. If yes, Will Retail and Real Estate or any existing Functional modules affect?
    No, there is no impact.
    4. Normally what is the time frame for implementing the Real Estate Module for GCC country zone.
    That based on project, max is 4 to 6 monts
    5. Real Estate is a new installation or Add-on ?
    No.
    Thanks
    Jilani

  • Sales Organization Structure for Distribution Industry

    Hi Experts,
    Need some inputs wrt Distribution Industry
    1. In Distributor set up. how should we set up the different manufactures which supply the products for distribution.
    2. How should we link the manufactures to Products they supply.
    3. How should we link the sales representatives to specific manufactures.
    4. Would it be a wise decision to incorporate manufactures as a division in the organization structure. Or should we map the manufactures as vendors and maintain the Vendor Info records.
    It would be really great if any one can share their experiences wrt to sales organization structure in the Distribution industry especially Pharma Distribution.
    Regards,
    KK

    hi
    this is to inform you that:
    first of all  i have a question to you.  you are manufacturer of products that means are you paying excise duty for manufacturing products or only distributor of products.
    1. In Distributor set up. how should we set up the different manufactures which supply the products for distribution.
    1.a. You can consider if you are manufacturing and distrubuting products
    If you are a manufacturer - tae material FERT if you are a distributor - tae HAWA asa material type.
    2. How should we link the manufactures to Products they supply.
    2.a. the organisation struccture lins each other & MMR also helps to lin 
    3. How should we link the sales representatives to specific manufactures.
    3.a. it may be specific to divisions tae one sales group for each specific divisions.
    4. Would it be a wise decision to incorporate manufactures as a division in the organization structure. Or should we map the manufactures as vendors and maintain the Vendor Info records.
    4.a. manufacturer as a vendor and different products a divisions.
    It would be really great if any one can share their experiences wrt to sales organization structure in the Distribution industry especially Pharma Distribution.
    sales organizations : 2 - domestic & exports
    distribution channels : 3 - retail - super stocists - C & F agents.
    retail/wholesales/distributors/superdistributors/super distributors - all you can consider all into one distribution channel or tae as different distribution channels you have to analyse from reports perspective to have all these.
    divisions - products = divisions lie cardiac - orthopedic to name a few.
    sales office : you can have many as per your requriment.
    sales group : basing on divisions = sales groups
    company code = how many balance sheets you are submitting now to AAI that many company codes you have to have.
    batch management with FIFO or LIFO strategy has to be mandatory in implementation.
    balajia

  • SAP MM Organization structure for the Utilities Industry

    Hi,
    Please let me know how does the typlical org structutre should look like for the Utilities company.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    Material management organizational structure includes
    1. Purchasing Organization,
    2. Plant,
    3. Storage Location &
    4. Purchasing Group.
    Note:
    It depends how you project or design the purchasing group in the organization & purchase group can be created and represent as department .In general, company have many more departments & need to control & approval of all purchasing documents at department level & at the end to know cost incurred in each department with various activities( more then one& each GL represent one activity) .So in turn Purchasing group(department) is linked  to cost center and then different G/L accounts which represent various activities linked with the cost center.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Organizational Structure for Public sector

    Hi Experts ,
    I am in a public sector company ...would like to know is there any change in organizational sector ...can any one send me link or document  or template so that i can have a view of Standard SAP public sector org.structure ...so that i can check how all the elements in the organization like FI,MM,SD integrate into it .....
    Regards
    Albert .

    You can also take a look at the Best Practices for Public Sector documentation. There you can find some preconfigured Business Scenarios with their corresponding structures. Currently the Best Practices released are based on Belgium. In a future more countries will follow.
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/bp_publicsectorv2600/PS_BE/HTML/index.htm">Best Practices for Public Sector BE</a>
    there you can browse into:
    Business Information --> Business Blueprint   
    and also
    Business Information --> Preconfigured scenarios
    although this is just a template may get you an idea of a working configuration for Public Sector. Details will actually be highly dependant on your country and PS organization.
    regards,
    Diego

  • GTS Organization Structure for Plants in foreign countries

    Hello,
    I want to get an solution for the following task:
    A German Company, represented with one Company Code in ECC, has about 40 Sales- and/or Productionplants all over the word. These plants do deliveries for german sales orders and projekts.
    The related organization mapping ECC<->GTS is n:1 , means you can only set up one Foreign trade organization for at least one company code.
    And you must set up Legal units for every plant you want to deliver from and set up the relation to the one FTO.
    When using Export control you must set up different legal Regulation regarding to one FTO.
    And this is the point, does anybody have experience with such a constellation? SAP itself is warning to do so in there trainings, but I think as long as SAP will not have a solution for plants in foreign countries have no other chance  or do I have ?
    Thanks for ideas in advance,
    Barbara

    Hi Sophie,
    Just to make sure, i got your question.
    1) You have 2 foreign trade organisations. 1 in Switzerland and 1 in Germany?
    2)  For some plants, you would like to export under Germany Foreign trade org.?
    But why do you need to export frm German FTO for a Switz plant.
    If what i stated above is right.
    You can use a table maintained mapping those plants with the German company code. so, have a custom dev. done to transfer this particular company code for any SO,Del created from this plants.
    So, the resulting Export document in GTS holds the german FTO.
    Please do correct me if i had understood your req. wrongly.
    Regards
    Dhilipan

  • JDBC  Receiver Structure for Synchronous scenario

    Hi,
    I have synchronous scenairo of jdbc where we are executing the stored procedure, up to response message  mapping it is working fine and getting value from stored procedure but the problem is that response result not able to send to response target. where response is sending output ot jdbc receiver in response target.
    In SXMB_Moni we get response id like this
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    - <ns0:MT_SP_RESPONSE_TARGET xmlns:ns0="http://ns_jdbctest">
    - <TESTSP>
    - <row action="INSERT">
      <table>TESTSP</table>
      </row>
      </TESTSP>
      </ns0:MT_SP_RESPONSE_TARGET>
    Where access element is missing but in response mapping it is properly structured like this
    MT_SP_RESPONSE_TARGET     Element     DT_SP_RESPONSE_TARGET               null               
    TESTSP     Element          1               
    row     Element          1..unbounded               
    action     Attribute     xsd:string     required                    
    table     Element     xsd:string     1               
    access     Element          0..unbounded                    
    Result     Element     xsd:integer     0..1          
    Please Suggest.
    Regards
    Laxmi Bhushan

    Its All Done the same way.
    XSMB_MONI and CC Monitoring have not any problem , Message Is sucessfully DLVD.
    But in SXMB_MONI response  struecture is like this
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    - <ns0:MT_SP_RESPONSE_TARGET xmlns:ns0="http://ns_jdbctest">
    - <TESTSP>
    - <row action="INSERT">
      <table>TESTSP</table>
      </row>
      </TESTSP>
      </ns0:MT_SP_RESPONSE_TARGET>
    And INBOUND Payload for source response is like this
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    - <ns0:MT_SP_JDBC_response xmlns:ns0="http://ns_jdbctest">
    - <GetNextSiteNumberTEST_response>
      <Result>113</Result>
      </GetNextSiteNumberTEST_response>
      </ns0:MT_SP_JDBC_response>
    Result key is not in the access element.
    Pls correct me.
    Regards
    Laxmi Bhushan

  • Organization Structures For FI and CO

    Hi,
    Anyone can help me in this.
    Thanks & Regards
    Rajani

    Please refer below post:
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=4671834&messageID=3777036
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=4671834&messageID=3967425
    Pls assign points as way to say thanks

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error while running SDK application in XIR3 environment

    Hi all, Thanks for your support provided so far. I have developed a SDK application using BOE SDK in BO XI-R2 environment. This application queries the CMC and provides the list of objects, users etc., While running the  application in BO XI-R3 envir

  • Badi created throught Enhancement Spot,but it is not registered in SXS_ATTR

    Hi All, Can anyone please tell me regarding why, When BADI created through Enhancement Spot, it is not registration in the SXS_ATTR table. During creation of BADI, Through BADI Definition, the interface and Class is generated by the system itself. Wh

  • Mac mini 2011 display going black

    I just got my new core i7 + SSD 2011 Mac mini. I noticed during initialization of Lion and during a reinstall of Lion that my screen would flash to black for a second or two. A few days after installing Lion I still get this random flash a black a fe

  • Run SunOne using normal user

    Hi, I have installed SunOne AppSvr7 on UNIX Server (SunOS) on my own directory "/export/home/SUNWappsvr7". I have installed the software using root permission. I can start and stop the app-server using root with no problem. However, I need to run/ope

  • ICloud inaccesable? 10/16/2012 @ 11:00 CST

    I can sign on to iCloud but when I click on iWork, Calendar, or any other apps I get the message: "There was a problem loading the application" I am using my MapBook Pro on a public library network.  I have tried both Safari and Firefox. Anyone else