OUTPUT PNG W/ Alpha for the web?

Hello to everyone.
I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this...
I need to output my file as a PNG with an ALPHA Channel for the web.  First, I created an alpha for my image, and then I tried to simply use the "save as" function and select the PNG format, but the ALPHA selection is grayed out.  I've also tried "the save for web function" and selected transparency, but when I reopen the file the alpha channel has dissappeared.  I know that it is possible to save an alpha channel to a PNG, but I can't seem to do it with Photoshop... Can anyone help?
Thanks in advance.
Bryce

Hello Zeno Bokor
Thanks for your reply.
In fact, my client, who is using the images for a web game that they are developing, requested that the files have an Alpha channel.  They have explained that the alpha channel helps the video program understand what areas are transparent.
I wish that it was just a case of transparency... It would be hell of a lot easier.
Any ideas?
Thanks again.
bgub.

Similar Messages

  • Saving JPG to PNG using Save for the Web

    Morning
    I came across Paul Riggott's script for saving PSD to PNG which I changed to JPG to PSD.
    The only problem with this is that the file size in most cases is larger than the original.
    Is there a way to do a save as for the web as well?
    Here is the  original code:
    #target photoshop
    var imageFolder = Folder.selectDialog("Select top folder to process");
    var folderList=[];
    if (imageFolder != null)  {
    processFolder(imageFolder);
    folderList.unshift(imageFolder);
    createPNGfromJPG(folderList);
    function createPNGfromJPG(folderList){
    for(var a in folderList){
      var fileList = folderList[a].getFiles ("*.jpg");
       for (var z in fileList){
        var file = fileList[z];
        open(file);
        var Name = fileList[z].name.replace(/\.[^\.]+$/, '');
        var saveFile = File(decodeURI(fileList[z].path+"/"+Name+".png"));
        SavePNG(saveFile);
        app.activeDocument.close(SaveOptions.DONOTSAVECHANGES);
    function processFolder(folder) {
        var fileList = folder.getFiles()
         for (var i = 0; i < fileList.length; i++) {
            var file = fileList[i];
    if (file instanceof Folder) {
      folderList.push(file); 
           processFolder(file);
    function SavePNG(saveFile){
        pngSaveOptions = new PNGSaveOptions();
        pngSaveOptions.embedColorProfile = true;
        pngSaveOptions.formatOptions = FormatOptions.STANDARDBASELINE;
        pngSaveOptions.matte = MatteType.NONE;
        pngSaveOptions.quality = 1;
    pngSaveOptions.PNG8 = false;
        pngSaveOptions.transparency = true;
    activeDocument.saveAs(saveFile, pngSaveOptions, true, Extension.LOWERCASE);
    Any help or support to head me in the right direction would be appreciated.
    Iain

    This uses "Fitimage"....
    #target photoshop
    var imageFolder = Folder.selectDialog("Select top folder to process");
    var folderList=[];
    if (imageFolder != null)  {
    processFolder(imageFolder);
    folderList.unshift(imageFolder);
    createPNGfromJPG(folderList);
    function createPNGfromJPG(folderList){
    for(var a in folderList){
      var fileList = folderList[a].getFiles ("*.jpg");
       for (var z in fileList){
        var file = fileList[z];
        open(file);
        var Name = fileList[z].name.replace(/\.[^\.]+$/, '');
        var saveFile = File(decodeURI(fileList[z].path+"/"+Name+".png"));
        FitImage(640,640); //Resizes  to the longest size
        //FitImage(128,128);
        savePNG8SFW(saveFile);
        app.activeDocument.close(SaveOptions.DONOTSAVECHANGES);
    function processFolder(folder) {
        var fileList = folder.getFiles()
         for (var i = 0; i < fileList.length; i++) {
            var file = fileList[i];
    if (file instanceof Folder) {
      folderList.push(file); 
           processFolder(file);
    function savePNG8SFW(saveFile) {
        var desc8 = new ActionDescriptor();
            var desc9 = new ActionDescriptor();
            desc9.putEnumerated( charIDToTypeID('Op  '), charIDToTypeID('SWOp'), charIDToTypeID('OpSa') );
            desc9.putEnumerated( charIDToTypeID('Fmt '), charIDToTypeID('IRFm'), charIDToTypeID('PNG8') );
            desc9.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('Intr'), false );
            desc9.putEnumerated( charIDToTypeID('RedA'), charIDToTypeID('IRRd'), charIDToTypeID('Sltv') );
            desc9.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('RChT'), false );
            desc9.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('RChV'), false );
            desc9.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('AuRd'), false );
            desc9.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('NCol'), 256 ); //Number of colours.
            desc9.putEnumerated( charIDToTypeID('Dthr'), charIDToTypeID('IRDt'), charIDToTypeID('Dfsn') );
            desc9.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('DthA'), 100 );
            desc9.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('DChS'), 0 );
            desc9.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('DCUI'), 0 );
            desc9.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('DChT'), false );
            desc9.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('DChV'), false );
            desc9.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('WebS'), 0 );
            desc9.putEnumerated( charIDToTypeID('TDth'), charIDToTypeID('IRDt'), charIDToTypeID('None') );
            desc9.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('TDtA'), 100 );
            desc9.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('Trns'), true );
            desc9.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('Mtt '), false );
            desc9.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('MttR'), 255 );
            desc9.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('MttG'), 255 );
            desc9.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('MttB'), 255 );
            desc9.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('SHTM'), false );
            desc9.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('SImg'), true );
            desc9.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('SSSO'), false );
                var list3 = new ActionList();
            desc9.putList( charIDToTypeID('SSLt'), list3 );
            desc9.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('DIDr'), false );
            desc9.putPath( charIDToTypeID('In  '),File( saveFile) );
        desc8.putObject( charIDToTypeID('Usng'), stringIDToTypeID('SaveForWeb'), desc9 );
        executeAction( charIDToTypeID('Expr'), desc8, DialogModes.NO );
    function FitImage( inWidth, inHeight ) {
    if ( inWidth == undefined || inHeight == undefined ) {
      alert( "FitImage requires both Width & Height!");
      return;
    var desc = new ActionDescriptor();
    var unitPixels = charIDToTypeID( '#Pxl' );
    desc.putUnitDouble( charIDToTypeID( 'Wdth' ), unitPixels, inWidth );
    desc.putUnitDouble( charIDToTypeID( 'Hght' ), unitPixels, inHeight );
    var runtimeEventID = stringIDToTypeID( "3caa3434-cb67-11d1-bc43-0060b0a13dc4" );
    executeAction( runtimeEventID, desc, DialogModes.NO );

  • How to create clean text for the web in Photoshop/Illustrator

    I am puzzled to death on how in the world to get clean text for the web in Photoshop/Illustrator, particularly white text. I want my text to turn out exactly like the text at this website: thepainteddoor.org
    If you scroll down to the bottom of that page, notice the titles "Featured Media", "Social Networking", and "Contact Information". They are all .gif images. I have tried to replicate what these images look like for about 3 hours now to no avail. Can anyone tell me how to do this? It just looks like a simple outline or drop shadow, but I can't get it to show up like that. If someone could help me replicate that effect with text (aka make it show up clean as an image), I would graciously give them money through PayPal*.
    * = I will only give cash if it will replicate it exactly (and I mean exactly)..and it won't be too much..I'm a poor college student. :-P
    Thanks in advance!
    Thomas

    You would do it the way I created it:
    Select the Text tool in Photoshop and set the font and parameters as I have listed.  Then enter whatever text you like.  It will be rendered over the top of the lower layers you may have in the document.  Save as an image of the appropriate type and you're there.
    Note that "lower layers you may have in the document" could conceivably be none at all (i.e., you render the text over a transparent document).  You could imagine saving that as a .png with transparency and get light text in an image that could then be put over the top of anything else.  The alpha mixing will see to it that the edges smoothly blend with the background.  I haven't actually tried this (I usually do try my own suggestions) because of lack of time right now.
    -Noel
    Edit:  Markerline and I seem to be on the same crystal-controlled wavelength. 

  • Save for the web seq

    I need to save for the web an animation of about 100 frames. The problem is the only way to do that seems to be saving the file as a gif but I need to keep them frame by frame. I was wondering if there is a way to save for the web the entire sequence and keep it as a jpg or png.
    Tx

    Simply render the animation to whatever format you find suitable using File --> Render Video, then convert the result using batch processing.
    Mylenium

  • Recomended configurations for creating video for the web

    I'm working on a project creating video segments for the web (no plans for broadcast of DVD) and I'm looking for opinions on the most efficient way to use FCP to do this. We are shooting with an HD camera with a green screen and composting a couple of additional layers of Motion graphics and we found that the render times were really long. I'm looking for ways to mitigate this, on thing we did was switch from shooting in 1080p to 720p. We also tried shooting at 24fps instead of the broadcast 60fps and that cut our render time by a good percentage. Since the final product is going to be 640 by 360 at 15fps it seems like a good trade off but are there any down sides I'm not thinking of.
    I was also wondering if there might be an advantage to working at the size of the final product, if the FCP sequence were 640 by 360 would there be any advantages in terms of render times and what might the disadvantages would be.
    This is my first semi-professional project, just been a hobbyist up until now so any advice is appreciated.

    MoSaT wrote:
    We are shooting with an HD camera with a green screen and composting a couple of additional layers of Motion graphics and we found that the render times were really long. I'm looking for ways to mitigate this, on thing we did was switch from shooting in 1080p to 720p. We also tried shooting at 24fps instead of the broadcast 60fps and that cut our render time by a good percentage.
    those simple steps reduced the number of pixels in each frame from about a million to 750,00, about 25%; and you reduced the number of frames from 30 or 60 to 24 or 48. So, yeah, your rendering times are going down. If your Motion project has ten HD layers you're saving tons of processing.
    MoSaT wrote:
    This is my first semi-professional project, just been a hobbyist up until now so any advice is appreciated.
    Since the final product is going to be 640 by 360 at 15fps it seems like a good trade off but are there any down sides I'm not thinking of.
    Absolutely. But you engaged the project without knowing how you were going to accomplish anything; implies your plans for improving workflow will be similarly incomplete. We all got by with NTSC and plan ol' DV for decades. The web is a low end distribution system, not a theatrical viewing experience. You can force your viewers to download a huge file and watch it on their TVs or you can open it up in weensy teeny window on their iPhones.
    MoSaT wrote:
    I was also wondering if there might be an advantage to working at the size of the final product, if the FCP sequence were 640 by 360 would there be any advantages in terms of render times and what might the disadvantages would be.
    Purists will be correct in telling you better source footage results in better uploads. I will tell you that's true but it's academic. Your realworld needs are based on your web upload, not your plans to archive high def footage for future exploitation.
    Here's what I'd do: Work backwards. Figure out what your upload needs are--exactly. Research Compressor and other compression systems to determine how you are going to process your project to get the target output. Now decide what format that software wants to process to create the best results. then figure out how you want to provide that input for the compression application. then figure out what the tradeoffs are for your original footage in terms of your camera resources, your skills with the camera, and your mistaken impression that effects and chromakey should be fast.
    bogiesan

  • Transparent GIFs for the web

    Hope someone can help with this.
    I'm basically trying to optimize a transparent image for the
    web. I have a straight PNG vesion here, which is what I'm trying to
    do, but it's around 96k - so a bit high.
    It looks like :
    example
    one
    I tried exporting it as an 8 bit PNG, which got the file size
    down, and looks OK in Safari, but looks hopeless in IE (6) :
    example
    2
    So I tried exporting as a transparent GIF, but it only looks
    like these :
    example
    3
    example
    4
    Any tips on how I can optimize it a bit better for the web,
    and retain it's original appearance?
    Cheers.

    As I have asked several times on the DW forum, how did you
    export the PNG
    image?
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
    - Template Triage!
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
    - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
    ==================
    "Iain71" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:fan87d$n8r$[email protected]..
    > Hope someone can help with this.
    >
    > I'm basically trying to optimize a transparent image for
    the web. I have a
    > straight PNG vesion here, which is what I'm trying to
    do, but it's around
    > 96k -
    > so a bit high.
    >
    > It looks like :
    >
    >
    http://www.handprintdvd.co.uk/webdesign/carcarenew/homepagetemp.shtml
    >
    > I tried exporting it as an 8 bit PNG, which got the file
    size down, and
    > looks
    > OK in Safari, but looks hopeless in IE (6) :
    >
    >
    http://www.handprintdvd.co.uk/webdesign/carcarenew/homepage.shtml
    >
    > So I tried exporting as a transparent GIF, but it only
    looks like these :
    >
    >
    http://www.handprintdvd.co.uk/webdesign/carcarenew/homepagetemp3.shtml
    >
    >
    http://www.handprintdvd.co.uk/webdesign/carcarenew/homepagetemp4.shtml
    >
    > Any tips on how I can optimize it a bit better for the
    web, and retain
    > it's
    > original appearance?
    >
    > Cheers.
    >

  • Is there a way to stop colors flattening when encoding for the web and DVD

    Hi. I am in post prod on my first feature film, which has some great horror dream sequences, lit red and green in the Mario Bava tradition. They really do look stunning in the original footage, with highly saturated crisp colors (We had a really great cinematographer) But when I try to create clips for the web, the colors flatten a lot. They look better on my i-phone than my Lcd computer monitor. doing DVD outputs also looses something, but less so. It depends on the playback equip. My plasma TV and upscaling dvd player make them look fairly good. The footage is progressive scan 25 frames per sec HD. (16:9 cropped to 2:35:1) Does anyone know the optimum settings for web encoding have just used 310x710 pixels using H264 compressor at 3000 kbts per sec

    Hi
    YEs you can read the ALE model data.
        CALL FUNCTION 'OWN_LOGICAL_SYSTEM_GET'
          IMPORTING
            own_logical_system             = sending_system
          EXCEPTIONS
            own_logical_system_not_defined = 01.
        SELECT   * FROM tbd05  INTO TABLE i_tbd05
        WHERE    sndsystem  = sending_system
        AND      mestyp     = message_type.
    Regards,
    Vijay V

  • Exporting Clipped images for the Web... CONFUSED! ? Help ..? AI CS3

    Hi folks,
    I don't use Illustrator as much as I'd like, since my workflow is mostly on
    the web, but I'm finding it nearly impossible to export images I receive
    from print designers for web use. Many of these images are EPS or AI.
    They are clipped images, which is great, BUT when I try to Save for the Web,
    the error comes back that they are too large for the web and may crash AI.
    OR if I export to PNG or PSD, the files lose their transparency and I have
    to extract them manually from the white backgrounds, which defeats the whole
    purpose. I have tried opening in Fireworks and Photoshop with the same
    result. I've changed the originals from CMYK to RGB, but it doesn't help.
    Plus the images export with a huge crop area instead of just the image
    itself.
    I'd really like to be able to use AI, but I'm finding this situation
    unworkable. I am sure I'm missing something simple , but I'd appreciate any
    help greatly!
    Thanks
    Jeff
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Jefferis Peterson, Pres.
    Web Design and Marketing
    http://www.PetersonSales.com

    Thanks for your help Jean et al.
    I only use Illustrator occasionally and when I have to. Not because I don't
    like the idea, but I'm almost completely web oriented and I find its layout
    is not as instinctive and smooth as Fireworks, and I use Photoshop for
    original layered images. The problem comes when I get a file from a printer
    who uses Quark and knows nothing about web prep and exporting for other
    uses. He couldn't export a layered file for some reason even though he had
    the backgrounds layered for print work.
    You are right, I've opened the tiff and eps docs from the printer before and
    played with them in AI, and saved them to ai native formats. I *thought* the
    eps files were created in ai by the printer, because they had the clipping
    paths and artboards. Obviously they were not. They had just opened with the
    default 14400 artboard which is why I thought they had been "set." So when I
    set the new 30x30 custom, I started seeing these files with a new
    artboard...
    So, in sum, I first tried to use these files in Photoshop, but they open
    as flat files and the clipping paths are lost. Only by experimenting with
    ai, did I find the files had clipping paths. I guess what threw me was that
    ai could extract clipping paths from eps that Photoshop could not.
    Jeff
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Jefferis Peterson, Pres.
    Web Design and Marketing
    http://www.PetersonSales.com

  • HDV Aspect Ratio and Exporting For the Web

    INTRODUCTION
    I am trying to export an HDV video for the first time and have managed to confuse myself. I want to upload it to blip.tv and they transcoded videos into Flash with 4:3 aspect ratio. But more than that, I want to understand how this all works so I don't have to guess about the settings that will give me what I want.
    BACKGROUND DATA
    4/3 is 1.333...
    16/9 is 1.777...
    1440/1080 is 1.333... (if the pixels are square)
    1920/1080 is 1.777... (if the pixels are square)
    In FCP my clip format says:
    Frame Size: 1440 x 1080
    Pixel Aspect: HD (1440 x 1080) (Does this mean the pixels are 1.333... times wider than it is high?)
    EXPORT USING QUICKTIME CONVERSION
    When I go to export this clip using Quicktime Conversion under the Options... Size... dialog and look at the Dimensions dropdown, (I assume this is the dimensions of the exported video. Is that correct?)
    Some of the settings are (the settings are in quotes, my notes are in parentheses.):
    "HD 1440 x 1080 16:9" (if pixels are square this is 4/3)
    "HD 1920 X 1080 16:9" (if pixels are square this is 16/9)
    So both of these settings claim to be 16:9 but they both can't be true unless they have different pixel aspect ratios (which I find hard to believe). This makes me think I don't really know what they mean when they notate something as 16:9. Can anyone give a definition that will help me here?
    EXPORTING FOR THE WEB
    Using FCS2, what settings should I use to export this clip undistorted for the web (with letterbox if needed)?
    Thanks for the help,
    Rob:-]

    What I find with HDV 16x9 1440x1080 footage, is that when you output for the web you have to hard code the size you want the result to be. 320x180 or 640x360 for example scale things nicely. If you want bigger, just do the math.
    I don't know why but whenever I select a predefined output size, it always screws it up (I don't work with 4:3 ever, so I'm speaking only of 16x9). So I always enter the size I want.
    And as far as Compressor 3, I really can't get that to set the size I want correctly either. Mostly its due to me being lazy and not wanting to spend a year reading the Compressor manual. A package that should basically have the easiest interface known to man is now so complicated that unless I have to hand-holding tutorial, or get to drag/drop one of their presets, I end up screwing things up with it. Not to mention that you get to wait for hours just to see how you screwed up the settings of your output.

  • The save for the web function has stopped working in my copy of photoshop elements 12.  I get this message, " The operation could not be completed.  The system cannot find the path specified" Resetting preferences did not fix.

    The save for the web function has stopped working in my copy of photoshop elements 12.  I get this message, “ The operation could not be completed.  The system cannot find the path specified” Resetting preferences did not fix.

    my os is windows 7.  elements 12 worked fine for many months then save for the web stopped working

  • HD video compressed for the web

    I was doing some testing trying to figure out the best way to compress the HD video I get from the Sony XDCAM HD for the web (streaming). I shoot in HD (1080/30P) because it's needed for our videos. The web streaming is secondary.
    I would prefer to make the web videos .flv because it works best and most easily cross-platform. In the real world, the majority of users have Windows PCs, which made me hesitant to use h.264 (.m4v) because it probably would require the average user to download things they may not wan to. Nonetheless, it has to be viewable on all computers in all browers.
    So, I took three 10 second clips of steady camera video with audio from the camera that I used in all tests. I will refer to them by clip number...
    Clip 1: 30P 16:9 High quality, 10sec=45mb
    Clip 2: 30P 16:9 Low Quality, 10sec=24mb
    Clip 3: 60i 16:9 High Quality, 10sec=45mb
    First I tested making FLV is Adobe CS3 Encoder using the High Quality (700) setting.
    Test 1 used size 848x480 (16:9)
    Clip 1: 1.3mb
    Clip 2: 1.1mb
    Clip 3: 1.2mb
    Comments: Looked very crisp, audio was clean, slightly darker image than original on default settings
    Test 2 used size 480x270 (16:9)
    Clip 1: 1.2mb
    Clip 2: 1.1mb
    Clip 3: 1.1mb
    Comments: Looked very crisp, audio was clean, slightly darker image than original on default settings
    Next, I tested making .m4v using the h.264 iPod settings in Compressor.
    Test 1 used size 640x370.
    Clip 1: 240kb
    Clip 2: 1440kb
    Clip 3: 204kb
    Comments: Image wasn't quite as clean as the Flash files, but still good. Much lighter/brighter than the Flash files also. Low Quality HD video had high file size... why? I don't know, but I don't shoot on LQ for things anyway.
    Test 2 used size 320x180.
    Clip 1: 160kb
    Clip 2: 865kb
    Clip 3: 865kb
    Comments: Image wasn't quite as clean as the Flash files, but still good. Much lighter/brighter than the Flash files also. Low Quality HD video had high file size... also the 60i file...why? I don't know.
    In conclusion, I'm lucky that I shoot 30P since it worked well in all areas. The h264 codec provides a much smaller file size than Flash, with a good image. Amazing considering we started with a 45MB clip. What are the standards for aspect ratios for putting 16:9 video on the web? I haven't heard much set in stone like you have for 4:3 video. Nonetheless, the 640x360 or 480x270 seem to be a nice size for most uses.
    I have heard that in Flash 9 you can chance the m4v extension to flv and it will work. IF that is true, that would be great because now my concern is that a base Windows PC cannot play these .m4v images without plugins/codecs. I suppose right now its a tradeoff between smaller file size/less compatibility with h264 or larger file size, great compatibility with Flash.
    Any comments or suggestions to help out would be great. I typed this fast so forgive me if I left out any important info.

    Hi APPLE27:
    One comment from your post that immediately caught my attention was this, "Nonetheless, it has to be viewable on all computers in all browsers."
    Unfortunately, it is unrealistic to expect one digital video file to be viewable on "all computers in all browsers" as there are simply too may variations in both hardware and software.
    A common approach when offering digital video is to provide two formats to choose from and then within each of those two formats a few versions of the video for different bandwidths.
    For example, a web site might offer Video for Windows and QuickTime. For each of these, there would be a low bandwidth Video for Windows file and QuickTime file and a high bandwidth Video for Windows file and QuickTime file (four files total). Of course, there's also Flash Video, Real Video, MPEG1, and so on.
    For better or worse, YouTube.com has allowed video content creators the realistic expectation of creating a digital video file that is viewable on "most computers". But, the video is unavoidably tied to that web site.
    When it comes to online distribution of video, it's still very open ended.
    Also, computers are not all that's out there. Mobile devices are a huge market and you'd be hard pressed to create a single digital video file that will play on all mobile devices (iPhone, iPod Touch, Palm Treo, Sony PSP, etc.) either from local storage or from a mobile browser.
    QuickTime offers a solution for creating a referencing movie - one file that links to other digital video files, but it too is imperfect at best when it comes to reaching the broadest audience possible.
    With my few comments here, I'm just scratching the surface. But, it all starts where you are right now: caring about the image quality when exporting from your edited master.
    -Warren

  • Exporting FCP 16:9 to QT for the web in 16:9?

    Hello everyone,
    I recently began doing my projects in 16:9 mode. I shoot them with my GL2's in 16:9, then capture to FCP as usual. FCP then automatically recognizes the 16:9 footage and adjusts everything perfectly for me. I figured out how to get the footage to DVDSP by 'forcing letterbox'. This plays the true 16:9 footage on a widescreen TV perfectly.
    Now, I've come to another bridge that I can't seem to cross... that is... exporting the video to QT for the web in 16:9. I did a lot of searching here and all of the topics related to this did not help me at all. So, what I'm going to do is explain what I used to do when I shot in 4:3 mode:
    1. In FCP... File>Export>QT Conversion
    2. Format: QT Movie> Options
    3. Settings> Sorenson Video 3
    4. Frame Rate>15
    5. Key Frames: Every 150 frames
    6. Compressor> Medium
    7. Data Rate: Automatic
    8. OK
    9. Sound>Settings>Mpeg-4 Audio, 16bit, Stereo
    10. OK
    11. Prepare for Internet Streaming> Fast Start
    12. OK
    13. SAVE
    This usually turns a full sized 5 minute clip into a nice little presentation for the web no larger than 35 or so MB's. You can see a boat load of files like that on my website at (www.buerhausdesign.com).
    Now, what I want to do is get a similar sized video for the web, only in 16:9 as I'm now shooting and editing in 16:9.
    Does anyone have step-by-step instructions on how to do this? I know it's possible as I see movie trailors in 16:9 all the time in QT.
    Any help would be appreciated:)
    Matt

    Nope, tried all of that. It stretches the image way beyond 16:9. Currently, if I export as a 4:3 file, the widescreen displays correctly, but I get two black bars at the top and bottom of the frame. Manually sizing to a 16:9 size, to say 720x404, stretches everything... including the unwanted black bars.
    When I export to DVDSP, the black bars go away when I 'force letterbox'. There's gotta be a way to get it to work in QT.

  • I've just bought a Macbook Pro 15" and I'm trying to use Photoshop, but the resolution its displaying the images at for 100% are too small. I have to design for the web, so need to be intricate with detail, but I'm finding it adjusts the resolution of the

    I've just bought a Macbook Pro 15" and I'm trying to use Photoshop, but the resolution its displaying the images at for 100% are too small. I have to design for the web, so need to be intricate with detail, but I'm finding it adjusts the resolution of the image right down. (I mean you can see the image clearly, but it's too small to edit). When I look at Safari and see a web page at 100% it's clear, but the same page displayed in Photoshop CC appears 50% of the size (even though it says it's 100%)   If I move the application window to another screen it adjusts it correctly  – leaving all the pallettes, menus and tools correctly sized as they are on the retina display   Is there some way to adjust the way Photoshop CC displays images so it is more consistent with what you actually see?   There doesn't seem to be any answer on the Adobe forum, so hopefully someone here can shed some light.  MacBook Pro with Retina display, 15", OS X Yosemite (10.10.2), Photoshop CC 2014

    I tested both ways. With "open in low resolution" ckecked the size of the images is cool, but it is low-resolution including Photoshop appearance.
    If "open in low resolution" is unckecked the appearance is good but the very small size.
    See the image below. It has 650 x 732 px, 72 dpi. The font of the text "Neste aniversário ..." is with 18pt.

  • HT5182 How can I convert Raw images from iphoto to jpg for the web?

    I have some pictures in Raw mode stored in my Iphoto that I need to convert in JPG for the web and to print in business cards, I have been going around e-mailing the pictures to myself in large or medium size and then saving them again to my iphoto. Is there a way to do this from iphoto directly?

    iMac (24-inch Early 2009), iOS 6
    Are your pictures on your iMac or on an IOS device?
    On your iMac use "File > Export " set the jpeg quality and size you want:
    Regards
    Léonie
    Sorry, Ralph, I see, we have been cross posting

  • Problems with PSE 10 when saving for the web.

    I'm having problems saving for web with PSE 10. I edit in RAW, edit in PSE 10, save as Jpeg, resize and save for the web.  Results are muddled and not sharp (looks cartoonish). Also, there is no metadata when you look at the image properties.  I uninstalled the program and installed again. No change.

    Are you resizing the photo before save for web?
    What settings are you using in the save for web dialog for the jpeg quality?
    If you compress the jpeg too much (low quality settings below 60), that can make your photos look bad.
    And save for the web in pse 10 automatically strips any metadata in order to keep the file sizes smaller.
    Also, the save for web in pse 10 has a bad habit of not remembering your last used settings, so it's good to verify that your actually set to jpeg instead of the default GIF setting.
    Message was edited by: R_Kelly

Maybe you are looking for