Over commit issue in Sales

Hi gurus,
Due to sales org change in production some of the orders got over commit by ATP check.
By doing re atp check manually order quantity is getting corrected.
How to find list of affected orders.
Inputs are highly appriciated.
Thanks,
Bala B.

Yes you can achieve the desired result in SQVI. What you can do is let the input parameters be
Sale Order number
Created On (ERDAT)
and the output be
Sale Order number
Line Item reference (POSNR)
Material Code
Quantity
Confirmed quantity
You can get all the above fields from VBAP but for the last one which is available in VBEP. If you dont have the sale order references, then consider adding VBAK also where you input Sales Document Type, if need be.
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

Free goods determined in Delivery over Order Quantity in Sales Order Item

Hi Gurus,
I've a problem about using free goods determination.
First I created free goods master record with following information
ZG1010012060075 From 100 PC -> Free good ZG1040012060075 2 PC
Free goods Category = '2' (Exclusive)
Free goods delivery control = 'E' (Delivery proportional to quantity in main item)
Then I've created Sales Order with
Item 10 ZG1010012060075 4,000 PC.
Item 11 ZG1040012060075(Free good) has been automatically determined for 80 PC
Then I've splitted Item 10 into 4 deliveries. The result of free goods determine in each delivery are as follow:
Delivery#1)
Item10 ZG1010012060075 = 1,176 PC
Item20 ZG1040012060075 = 24 PC
Delivery#2)
Item10 ZG1010012060075 = 1,176 PC
Item20 ZG1040012060075 = 24 PC
Delivery#3)
Item10 ZG1010012060075 = 1,176 PC
Item20 ZG1040012060075 = 24 PC
Delivery#4)
Item10 ZG1010012060075 = 472 PC
item20 ZG1040012060075 = 9 PC
*Remark : Total quantity of 'ZG1040012060075'(free goods) = 92424+24 = 81 PC
(Greater than 80 PC)*
I think the system determined free goods in Delivery#4 correctly due to rounding up. But It might not be over the order quantity in Sales Order Item 11. Even though I've set the item category in delivery with Check overdelivery = 'B' (Situation rejected with an error message), the free goods are determined over order qty. BUT if I change delivery qty in delivery#4 Item20 from 9 PC -> 8 PC -> 9 PC, the error message occurred.
My point is to fix the system not determine free goods in delivery items over order quantity in sales order item.
Has anyone met this situation before? Do you have any idea about this issue?
Best Regards,
Prachya Lalitnorasate

Dear Sai,
Thank you for your advice, but it didn't solve my problem.
I would like the system to determine free goods with proportional to main item AND In the last delivery main item delivered completely free goods must be determined equal to remaining open delivery item.
Do you have any idea about configuration/customization?

Interesting and an imporatant issue at sales order schedule line.

hi all,
interesting and an imporatant issue at sales order schedule line.
i created a sales order with 10 qty.and the system proposed a two schedule lines.
let's say to order created date is 27.11.2008.and the requested delivery date is 27.11.2008.
but the stock is not available today then the system proposed two more schedule lines apart from the 27.11.2008.so now there are three schedule lines like below.
schedule line date                      Material availabilyt date   delivery date
27.10.2008 with zero quantity.
28.10.2008 with 5 qty.                28.10.2008                     29.10.2008
02.10.2008 with 5 qty.                02.10.2008                     03.10.2008
now the delivery and pgi already for the schedule line 28.10.2008.
then when i run the availability check on 01.11.2008 system is over writing the material vailability date as today at the scheduleline number two.
now i can able to view only two schedule lines only.
schedule line date                      Material availabilyt date   delivery date
28.10.2008 with 5 qty.                01.11.2008                     29.10.2008
02.10.2008 with 5 qty.                01.11.2008                     02.11.2008
now my concern when we reschedule the avalability check it should notchange the Material availability date of the schedule line which i already delivered.
Regards,
sheshukumar

can any one repsond for this.....

Issue with sales order stock that is referencing a non-existing sales order

We have an issue with sale order stock.
Due to user error we have ended up with a negative quant of sales order stock in a bin. Further the error was due to mis-keying of sales order number. Hence this negative quant is referencing a sales order that does not exist.
We need to get rid of this quant.
I thought of cycling this quant off as a solution. And hence replicated the scenario in the test system. I was able to create a TO to cycle it off but cannot clear the differences from 999 . The error I get while trying to do this is "SD document not in database or has been archived" . This error is true since the sales order actually does not exist. So cycling it off did not work.
Can anyone suggest how we can get rid of this negative quant of sales order stock ?
Thanks

Hi,
You said that your user mistyped the SO number and it resulted in a -quant. In which transaction was it possible? If I give a non existing no. SAP doesn't allow me to book.
If I were you I would check both in WM & IM what the user had done...step-by-step...
Negative quant comes to existance in interim storage type if we book e.g. a GI. It should have started in IM...how was your user be able to do that??? If it was possible cannot you reverse the IM booking?
(...if all else fails...cannot you create a SO document with external number assignment with the same number?...)
BR
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jun 24, 2008 8:31 PM

SAP Mobile Sales 2.0 delta load issue for Sales Orders

Hello,
we have used Mobile Sales 2.0 with a Windows app for a while now. Our current issue is that sales reps won't see any historical sales order data on their devices.
Background
Due customer requirements, we need to make small changes to customer master data attributes and reload all customers from ERP to CRM. Then we ran delta loads (MAS_PARTNER followed by all other objects) to DOE, in which virtually all 5000+ customer accounts were compared. The delta load ran for about 3 days (some performance bottleneck we haven't located yet).
During the delta load, data on devices was inconsistent. Accounts were missing and all transaction data disappeared. After the delta loads, all accounts and contacts are OK, save for a few. Data from activities (appointments, tasks) have reappeared, as they should. Only sales orders won't reappear. The sales orders exist in the backend and belong to active accounts and sales reps.
Settings and troubleshooting so far
We don't have any limitations for sales orders in CRM Sales Mobile configuration.
We've run delta loads for all objects in transaction SDOE_LOAD.
MAS_CUSTOMIZATION etc seem fine.
We've re-run initial load for sales orders from CRM.
In the test system, we've even reinitialized the whole CDS database on DOE and on the devices, then re-ran the loads.
Checked steps suggested in discussion
SAP CRM 2.0 initial load issue
Historical sales orders (those created before the master data reload) exist in the backend, but don't show up on the device.
If I change one of those historical sales orders in the backend, it gets sent to the device.
If I create a new sales order in the backend or on the device, it is saved and replicated just fine.
To sum it up, it seems DOE is unable to identify the sales orders relevant for replication.

First Doubt i got clarify by my self as we can go with Unwired Runtime option .
But i still have doubt in :
2. How can i Modifying the Main Menu for iOS.
i am able to customize the same for windows using files SybaseCRM.Configuration.xml file.
Same how can i do for iphone/ipad.

Pricing issue in sales order

Hi All,
We are facing pricing issue for few sales orders.
The pricing is being carried for line items even though there is valid condition record exist at pricing date of line items .
For example we are creating order on 26.10.2010 and Requested delivery date is 01.01.2011.
The pricing date at line tem is 01.01.2011 and condition record is valid only till 31.12.2010.
Still pricing is carried for line item and it is not for all the sales orders .
So could please advice how to overcome this kind of errors?
Thanks in advance

Hi All,
We are again facing pricing issue in sales order,the pricing date of line item is not in synchronization with the condition record validity date.
Due to that incorrect pricing is being carried out .
But when we do repricing the error is getting fixed.
So could you please let us what could be the root cause for this error ?
This is not happening for all the orders,for only few orders it happens.
If we create new order for same sold to ,sales doc type the error is not occuring.
Thanks,
Praveen

How to block material issuing after sales order invoiced?

As the subject mentioned, could be a possible to block material issuing since sales order invoiced, or
in the another words, after the sales order completed?
Or could be a possible to set sales order as closed, and then material issuing related with this sales order are
forbidden?
Thanks in advanced,
Zhou Zhen

Dear Friend
A sales order is created say order no 10000 and for material X say 10 units this order is delivered and PGIed and invoiced and the payment too has come
That means the order 10000 is closed
Case 1
Now an user goes to VA02 t code and put this order no 10000 and changes the material X qty from 10 to 12 and opens up the whole order once again
This can be controlled by using t code OVAH choosing message class the V4 message no 083 and change from warning to error
Case2
But to avoid the user to add material Y to the existing order say 10000 then i think we have to go for user exit
Because the system doesnot even throw a warning message too in case 2 (according to my knowledge) and allows another line item to be added in the same order
But you can test it if it throws any warning message we can try to convert that error
But in case 2 it is not happening(even warning is not there)
Regards
Raja

Goods issue without sales order

Hello experts,
                   1) Goods issue without sales order (movt type 251) in T.code "MB1A"*
                           Accounting entry:- Change in stock of Fin. Goods A/c    Dr.
                                                                      To Stock of Fin. Goods A/c
                   2) Customer Invoice through T.code "FB70"
                         Accounting entry:-     Customer A/c   Dr.
                                                             To Sales of Fin. Goods A/c.
We are temporarily not implementing SD module, i am entering Sales transaction data. Are the above two accounting entries correct in respect to "Goods Issue" and "Customer Invoice" ?
Regards
Ashwin

Thanks a lot, but if you could please tell me what impact will on the balance sheet? will the stock be reduced after goods issue
For eg;
         Change in stock of F.G A/c Dr.    200
                       To Stock of F.G A/c               200
         Customer A/c Dr.     200
                 To Sales of F.G       200.
Is this correct? and i have assigned cost center to "Change in stock of Fin. Goods.
Ashwin

Goods Issue to sales order

Hi Experts,
When doing Goods issue to sales order using movement type 231, I am getting the following warning message 'Sales order (SOBKZ = ) is not provided for this goods movement'. I think this warning is due to difference in special stock indicator in sales order and Goods issue transactions. Where should be the maintanence done, in order to prevent this warning message in future.
Regards,
Prasanna. R

Dear Prasanna
The special stock indicator is not maintained for your sales order item category in VOV7
Hence the error
Please maintain special stock indicator E in the item category details in VOV7 for your item category of yours
231 Goods issue for a customer order (without Shipping)
I hope you are doing this only
If you ignore this as a warning message it will hit somewhere down the process
So better maintain it in item category
Regards
Raja

Issue With Sales Document Type in BW.

Dear Experts,
I am facing an Issue with Sales Document Type(Object name is 0DOC_TYPE).
when i am loading data from R/3 to BW It is converting Sales Document type as follow
Sales Document Type in R/3                         Sales Document Type in BW
OR                                                                        TA
CR                                                                        G2
DR                                                                        L2
I check with an ABAPer and he told that there is conversion exit for this Object so that's why it is converting when sending to BW. But the user wants to see in Report same as it is in R/3 like OR, CR DR ... etc.
I have done some investigation and found that the conversion exit (CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_INPUT and CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_OUTPUT) are converting the values based in the table TAUUM
The staructure of TAUUM is
MANDT(Client) SPRAS(Language) AUART(Sales document type (not converted)   AUART_SPR(Language key for sales document type)
and values are
100 E TA OR
100 E G2 CR
etc....
The same Conversion exits(CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_INPUT and CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_OUTPUT) and table TAUUM are available in BW as well. So i thought I can Use InfoObject 0DOC_TYPE by changing it's conversion Routine as AUART(which runs based on the above mentioned conversion exits).
but the the problem is table TAUUM(Pool Table) does't have any data in BW.
So can anyone tell me is there any option to load data into table TAUUM from R/3 or any other option to solve this issue.
Your ideas will really help's me.
Thanks in advance,
Dara.

Hi Venkat,
Thanks a lot for your immediate response.
The InfoObject 0DOC_TYPE was without conversion exit by default. but when data coming from R/3 it is converting and sending to BW So that's why i am planning to use conversion exit "AUART" in the info Object.
I checked data in R/3 using RSA3 it is showing sales document type as "OR" and for the same transaction data when i checked in PSA it is showing as "TA".
Could you please let me know if there any other options.
Thanks in advance,
Dara.

How to allocate cost variances during goods issue in sales process?

Hi all,
In China GAAP, cost variances ( variance between standard cost and actual cost) should be capitalized to balance sheet at month-end.
Q1: Could I settle the cost variance to a B/S account instead of P/L account? What's SAP or your recommendation?
Q2: if we settle the cost variances to a B/S account, How could we allocate the production cost when post goods issue for sales order? i.e
Dr: COGS
Cr: cost of finished goods
Cr: production cost (B/S account, cost variances by proration of sold)
Please advice.Thanks in advance
Regards,
Alex LIU
Message was edited by:
Shuping Liu

Hi,
All variances between Standard & Actual cost should be settled to a P/L A/c as these are similar to Purchase Price variances on Raw Material purchases.
If you are valuing your Finished Goods @ Standard cost, then the difference between the Standard & the Actual cost should be debited or credited to a Price or Cost difference P/L A/c either at the time of doing the GR of the Production or at the time of posting the Goods Issue for Sales Order.
The balance in the Cost difference accounts needs to be finally posted to profitability segments in COPA.
Regards,
Assign points if useful.

BAPI For Create Goods Issue for Sales order with picked quantity

Hi friends,
Is there any BAPI available to create Goods issue For sales order with picked quantity...............?
we hv used BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CREATE_SLS
with sales order .......its creating delivery order but not doing goods issue with piked quantity........

pls,reply its argent

Over MobileMe Issues

I am totally over mobileme issues yet I love iWeb. Can anyone recommend a good hosting site that is compatible with iWeb? How do I upload the site etc without using mobileme?

studentoflife wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good hosting site that is compatible with iWeb?
All hosting services should be compatible with iWeb — but if the hosting service offers a choice of WIndows servers or Linux servers, choose Linux.
Some recommend this hosting service — particularly for its support:
http://www.hostexcellence.com
studentoflife wrote:
How do I upload the site etc without using mobileme?
This video tutorial may help:
_Publishing your website via FTP_

Calculate Commissions based on sales

Hello,
is there a way in SAP to calculate commissions based on sales?
We have hired a sales man. Is there a way to implement his company as a account and that he will get a payment check for his comissions once the customers paid the invoices?
I know there are already many threads here about this topic and I browsed through a lot of them. But I still don't have an idea how to set this up. I also checked this link already, but it didn't really help me a lot.
http://www.sap-img.com/sap-sd/steps-to-create-commission-for-agent.htm
Any help?
Thanks a lot
Anne

Anne, the commissions are a rather complex subject in SD, probably because companies handle the process differently and also sales reps are usually very sensitive about the subject. There is a special module "Incentives and Commissions" by Vistex, which is designed specifically for this task. It is pretty expensive, from what I've heard.
There is also something called "SAP Compensation Management", but I'm not familiar with it and am somewhat skeptical about the claims made here:
http://sdmodule.com/sap-chargebacks-without-vistex/87
P.S. You write "a sales man", so I'd question if it's worth bothering at all for just one person.
P.P.S. I couldn't help but notice that you have many posts but 0 points. You might want to start contributing to the community, otherwise just don't be surprised if you won't get many answers.

JMS - UserTransaction - Commit issue

Introduction
I am moving from WebSphere to Weblogic and have counterd an UserTransaction commit issue.
The code have not been modified, however the logic in Weblogic and Websphere behaves different.
The messagingsystem is Websphere MQ, in Weblogic I have QCF, destinations, host and port etc. in a .bindings file, and I have configured JMS server and JMS modules with corresponding jndi names.
I have verified that this configuration is correct throug a custom develop testtool deployed in WL, message is sent successfully to MQ.
The problem - description
However in my application i'm using UserTransaction and this is not working as expected.
I have two classes that communicate with MQ (AbcDAO.java and QueueBroker.java) AbcDAO.java creates a UserTransaction and communicates with Queuebroker throug a method called "SendToAutoS" this method retrives the corrilationId (for the message sendt to MQ) from Queuebroker.
The SendMessage method creates qcf, queueconnection, queue etc and sends the message to MQ. When i debug this steps (line:queueSender.send(theMessage) I can verify in MQ that a message count is registerted in mq on the correct queue, but it's not shown (since its not commited). However when performing finalize in Queuebroker, which close both session and connection, the messagecount is gone in MQ, and when returing to AbcDAO.java to perform ut.commit(); there is not any message on Queue.
For me it looks like the message is rolledback when session and connection closes.
Actions tried
If I change this line QueueBroker , transacted to false witch i understand sends message without the need to commit:
boolean transacted = false;
queueSession = queueConnection.createQueueSession(transacted, QueueSession.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
the message is sendt successfully to MQ. However now either commit or rollback on the UserTransaction is working with transacted=false.
I need the commit and rollback to be done on the UserTransaction for my application.
Anyone have an idea why this is not working?
The files - content
AbcDAO.java - that creates a usertransaction
ut = ServiceLocator.getInstance().getUserTransaction();
ut.begin();
msgCorId = sendToAutoS(userVO, messageSend, transactionQeueSend, transactionQeueFactory);
ut.commit();
//SendToAutoS - that calls the Queuebroker method - sendMessage
private String sendToAutoS(UserVO userVO, String message, String transactionQueue, String transactionQueueFactory) throws DaoException {
try {
log.debug("..");
return QueueBroker.getInstance().sendMessage(message, transactionQueue, transactionQueueFactory);
} catch (BrokerException be) {
log.error("BrokerException", be);
QueueBroker.java - that sends the message to MQ
public String sendMessage(String message, String transactionQueue, String transactionQueueFactory) throws BrokerException {
try {
// Get service locator
ServiceLocator sl = ServiceLocator.getInstance();
// Create QueueConnectionFactory with help form service locator
queueConnectionFactory = (QueueConnectionFactory) sl.getQueueConnectionFactory(transactionQueueFactory);
// Create QueueConnection
queueConnection = queueConnectionFactory.createQueueConnection();
// Create QueueSession, transacted - client has to commit !
boolean transacted = true;
queueSession = queueConnection.createQueueSession(transacted, QueueSession.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
// Create queue with help from service locator
queue = (Queue) sl.getQueue(transactionQueue);
// Create QueueSender
queueSender = queueSession.createSender(queue);
// Create message and sent it
Message theMessage = null;
theMessage = queueSession.createTextMessage(message);
// Log time
long time = System.currentTimeMillis();
// Set log time on message
theMessage.setJMSTimestamp(time);
// Send
queueSender.send(theMessage);
queueSender.close();
// Return unique messageID for message just been sent
return theMessage.getJMSMessageID();
} catch (JMSException je) {
BrokerException ex = new BrokerException();
ex.setMessageKey("requisition.jms.broker.queue");
Object[] o = {"SEND", "String to Autosys = " + message};
ex.setMessageArgs(o);
ex.setRootCause(je);
throw ex;
} catch (ServiceLocatorException e) {
BrokerException ex = new BrokerException();
ex.setMessageKey(e.getMessageKey());
ex.setMessageArgs(e.getMessageArgs());
ex.setRootCause(e.getRootCause());
throw ex;
} finally {
// Clean up - close connection and session if exist
if (queueConnection != null) {
finalize();
* Finalize queue handling
* @throws BrokerException e
protected void finalize() throws BrokerException {
try {
// Close connections
queueSession.close();
queueConnection.close();
} catch (JMSException je) {
BrokerException ex = new BrokerException();
ex.setMessageKey("requisition.jms.broker.queue");
Object[] o = {"FINALIZE", "Close connections" };
ex.setMessageArgs(o);
ex.setRootCause(je);
throw ex;
Edited by: reZer on 14.sep.2011 13:05
Edited by: reZer on 14.sep.2011 13:06

I know you are trying to send a JMS message, but just because this is true the generic JMS forum is not automatically the place you should ask questions like this. Your real beef is with the container you are using (Weblogic), UserTransaction and persistent JMS messages in combination with the specific JMS provider you are using.
You will have far more chance to get help with this problem if you ask it in the Weblogic forum which you can also find on this very website. If you make a new post, be sure to create a link to it here so people can follow it.
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=193
And perhaps more specific:
WebLogic Server - JMS

Over commit issue in Sales

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for