Overexposed image in lcd vew

Hi, i was testing my new hf r40 most of the time my prevew on the lcd looks very whiteish or overexposed, when i check the recorder video on my tv looks awesome but in cam monitor looks very bad, i just cant do adjustmen on whitw balance or exposure since i will underexpose if i judge image by the monitor, is this a normal issue or do i have a defective cam.
I can see in menu i can down the lcd image brightness and the setup have several blocks from whitw gray to black as a guide, but if i lower to min the image brightness i still get the first 2 block as white

btt.
Nobody knows how to do this? Trying to get our 3D files embedded in the pdf. Cant figure out how to have the 3rd party viewer right in the PDF for mark up.
Thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Overexposed images when not

    I got this problem in Photoshop CS3 and Bridge where all RAW/JPGS files appear to be overexposed when they are not.
    I had my computer repaired and after uninstalling and reinstalling the program, this problem shows up.
    All video drivers are okay and making changes to the color profiles or color management do not make it work the way it was before.
    In bridge, they appear overexposed and when I open them in Photoshop, the same thing happens.
    If I try to use windows viewer to open these images, they appear the way they should be.
    Any ideas?

    You need to calibrate your monitor.

  • Overexposed image saved in new Camera Raw 7

    I took an image (Camera raw format)  that was shot of a colorful tree last year, but overexposed; the sky was white. I edited it with camera raw in Photoshop CS5  and, then, cleared the settings in the Bridge and did it with Photoshop CS6 and camera raw 7. The difference was unbelievable. A few minutes in the new Camera Raw 7 and it was workable. I never got the image even satisfactory at all in Photoshop CS5 Camera Raw. This version of camera raw  really works well with over-exposed images.

    Hello! you are opening an image that had a been edited under a previous process. Go to the Camera Calibration Tab, and set it to 2012 process.

  • Canon 6D - Overexposed images after standby/power-off, returns to normal after initial shot

    Hi guys.
    I just recently got back from a long trip and on that long trip, I noticed my 6D has developed an interesting issue.
    Here's the deal.
    My 6D happens to terribly overexpose an image, but ONLY after being put in stand-by/sleep or being powered-off for an X amount of time.
    Once I take a shot after being powered back on again, all returns to normal. 
    Below are some examples of what I am experience and you can tell by the RAW data, all the parameters are the same but the exposures are different.
    When it began, I did not alter my original settings since getting the camera in January. I tried resetting my factory settings and it still happens. It will happen on pretty much any of my lenses, so this leads me to believe it is an issue with the body (either my 24-105 4L or my Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art)
    What say you Canon crew, do I need to send it in for a warranty claim? Your assistance = greatly appreciated. Thanks!
    PS: My next troubleshooting step is to reflash the firmware....I will update this thread accordingly to share if this makes a difference.

    It's overexposing the first shot, but the settings are identical?  Yeah, I'd say that's going back to Canon.
    Just out of curiosity though, does it happen in JPG too?  Are the shots we're looking at the jpg preview embedded in the RAW, or the RAW file itself?

  • Lennovo n200 3000 images on lcd distorted

    Hi
    i have n200 and yesterday when i turned on  my laptop all the images on the screen were distorted completely .. even the initail lennovo screen doesnot come clear all the images are moving up and down or just mangled up ...
    anyone plz help how can i get this problem rectified
    regards

    Hey
    thanks phil for the reply
    hey when i connect this with some external lcd monitor it works fine  and when on my laptops lcd even the first windows screen comes up ok for a few seconds and then starts to distort .. do u think this could be a bios problem .
    secondly mine has just run out of its warranty which is of 1 year ... so if my lcd is damaged ( in a mysterious way becuz i don't recall droping or handling it in a rough way) is there some cheap option as i dont want to spend a lot of money on it
    regards

  • Merge to HDR pro is producing very "bleached" and overexposed images.

    I don't know why this isn't working, but every single time I attempt to use merge to HDR pro, the result is an ugly bleached out photo, and editing in raw does nothing to help. I have tried using TIFFs, Jpegs, RAW files (all at different exposures from very dark to very light, to capture the entire range, usually 5 separate images), but whenever I select File>>Automate>>merge to HDR Pro, and select the files to use, the result is always really horrible.
    Why isn't this working for me? Here's a typical result:
    Please, any suggestions. The reason I bought photosop was for the HDR capability, and compatibility with lightroom. Honestly I get better results just blending images using GIMP, or just processing a single RAW file in Lightroom.
    It will also sometime go through its process of aligning the pictures and thinking for a few minutes, then just leave me with a blank dark gray workspace, without opning the HDR pro window after working with the images.
    Very frustrated. Any suggestions much appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Rob

    First this site for Adobe Product user there are forum and sub topic forum for Adobe suite of applications. Members here are not Adobe employees though some help Adobe employee do drop by.  If you think you have a bug  you can follow the an other Links in Photoshop menu Help>Photoshop Support Center... web page. It will take you to the right place Photoshop Family Customer Community

  • Perfect image in CS3 overexposed in Lightroom

    New user to Lightroom (1.1) - Windows XP; High spec PC; Apple Cinema Display (new last week) calibrated with Spyder2; I am used to developing photo images (Canon 1DSII) in CS3 and using layers instead of ND grad filters to bring out the sky etc. I was impressed by a brief demo of Lightroom, so bought it 2 weeks ago, but am now frustrated - I have developed images in L/R, exported to P/Shop, added another L/R develop of the same image as a layer, flattened the layers, saved as a new tiff (say "A"), reimported into L/R - (call that "B") (I had already tried the save in P/S and L/R will keep all that info etc) so its the same file (isnt it?) - the result is then that "A" looks perfect in P/S but overexposed in L/R. I have done screen prints of the P/S Histogram (nice bell shape) and the L/R Histogram (skewed to the right). What is going on? Should I give up on L/R and stick to P/S (and learn how to use Bridge properly for cataloging etc or even go back to the one Microsoft bought)? Other info - I checked the P/S colour space - it was Prophoto ("similar to L/R space" per the manual).

    Fantastic - thanks Jao - resetting the reimported files development did nothing - but changing the prefs, "removing" the file from L/R then reimporting it, produces an image identical to the P/S one. If I then hit the "Auto" button in "Develop" it adjusts it to the overexposed image I had before. So the "Auto" is not as useful as it could be (maybe its good on DNG's but not on Tiffs?)! Thanks again - I can now continue with L/R, and attempt the long process of cataloging the last 3 years images!

  • D700 RAW Images Overexposed by ACR

    Is anyone else having problems with d700 RAW images being significantly overexposed during the conversion process in Lightroom? The preview of the images are spot-on, beautiful and perfectly exposed (I know this is the JPEG data) and then it's as if some gremlin wreaks havoc - the histogram disappears and when it comes back, voilà! A harsh, overexposed image is what is left. I typically have to manually "underexpose" each image in the develop module between 2/3 and 1.5 stops - sometimes 2 - to get the exposure into the same neighborhood as the preview and then have to perform a boatload of other adjustments to correct for the flat, cold tones. It's adding so much time to my workflow, I'm afraid I may have to switch over to Capture NX2 - it seems to nail the RAW conversion perfectly - which would be a huge pain in the rear. Any help or direction would be appreciated - this is really a frustrating issue. There is a fair amount of discussion about this in the Aperture forums (Aperture's RAW conversion engine also seems to be blowing out D700 images) but I can't find anything on-point here about LightRoom.
    Am using a Macbook Pro with OSX 10.5
    Thanks // Bill

    There are three causes for this and No it should not happen. Go to one of your images and hit "reset". The image should return to being correctly exposed and fairly close (but not exactly the same) to the in-camera jpeg.
    1. As Dennis says, it is possible you are applying auto adjustments. Uncheck the preferences for that. While you are in that screen make sure you also reset all camera defaults.
    2. You are applying a preset on import. Make sure there is nothing like that in the import pane. Also make sure to hit reset on any images that were impacted.
    3. Camera RAW (the processor under the hood in Lightroom) is not the same RAW processor as your camera and Capture NX. They will render RAW differently. Read this
    FAQ entry for an explanation. You can make Lightroom render the same colors as your camera by using the
    Adobe Camera matching profiles. They really work as
    I showed here a long time ago.
    There is no good reason to go to Capture NX except when you need a lot of the U-points stuff. You can get Lightroom to render identical to jpegs out-of-the-camera and it is far faster and more convenient than the horrifyingly ugly(in my opinion) NX.

  • Merge to HDR pro is producing very washed out results. Resulting images look terrible and bleached.

    I posted here before, but was directed to go through the help menu in Photoshop, which brought me back here!! Please Help Me!
    Merge to HDR pro is producing very "bleached" and overexposed images.
    Thank you,
    Rob

    Thank you for the reply, Ed. I've delved into the PS preferences as best I could but did not see anything related to this issue. I have ACR set to convert at 240 dpi with ProPhoto color space and have never encountered this problem under typical 16 bit conversions from RAW to psd. For some reason PS sets the document size of 32 bit images to 3.5' x 5' @ 72 dpi which results in an extra step to the already time consuming workflow when creating such images in PS.
    Perhaps this is an issue Adobe can address in a future update? They did a good job addressing other issues such as the disappearing RGB data in the info pallette when adjusting images with curves. It appears that the Windows version of PS has too many non-fatal (but annoying) flaws that aren't present in the Mac version.

  • Blank LCD screen on my Cannon EOS 5DMK III

    Yesterday whilst viewing images my LCD screen went blank meaning i could not view images or change settings as nothing appears!! Anyone had anything similar happen and if so what was the outcome, im thinking i may have knocked something or pressed something i shouldnt have??? Confused!!

    The only "normal" reason that the screen will blank when the camera is powered on is if you use the "info" button to cycle the display to remain dark. Each time you press "info" (when not reviewing an image) will change what the LCD screen displays... it cycles through several options, but one option is to just remain dark.
    If pressing the "info" button again doesn't change it to the next mode where it's displaying something else, then likely there's more to the problem then just a setting.
    Tim Campbell
    5D II, 5D III, 60Da

  • Canon Power Shot SX50 HS.

    Hello All,
    I am a new member on the message boards.  Owner of a Canon Power Shot SX50 HS.
    I enjoy nature and take lots of bird, butterfly, deer, etc. shots.  Also scenery shots.  
    I do not understand the setting on this camera and I only use the auto mode.  
    Question:  What are the best settings (Apature and ISO) for the type of pictures I take.   Some come out sharp but lots have a blur.    Suggestions wlecome.......Thanks!

    Hi ssobel, GloriaS and everyone,
    Thanks for looking and commenting. I'm practicing daily and learning something new about the SX50 with each outing. So far, this is what's been working for me.
    I believe four main factors have helped me get the type of images I'm very happy with.
    1. Shooting primarily in Shutter Priority Mode or Manual Mode so I have control over shutter speed, which I set as high as possible for each scene. 
    2. Adjusting Exposure Compensation values for each and every shot when using Shutter Priority Mode or Aperture Priority Mode.
    3. Using Center-Weighted-Average Metering. 
    4. Using the "Framing Assist - Lock" feature is extemely effective when using the camera at, or near, maximum zoom. It's a button located ON the camera that you press while composing the shot. The use of this feature is explained on page 57 of the manual. Along with the other strategies I use to obtain sharp hand-held images when shooting toward the long end of the zoom, this extra bit of stabilization the Framing Assist - Lock provides really helps.
    I don't use a tripod when I take bird & wildlife photos. With a zoom this generous and especially on a point-and-shoot camera, it's helped me immensely to shoot in either Manual Mode or Shutter Priority Mode because I can increase the shutter speed to very high values and by doing so, greatly reduce hand-held camera shake. Along with the excellent image-stabilization performance of the camera, this combination (fast shutter speed & image-stabilization) gives my photos that extra bit of clarity people often comment on. Many of the photos on my website were taken at near or maximum zoom! Fast shutter speeds must not only be thought of for reducing subject motion blur.
    Also, I'm a heavy user of the "Exposure Compensation" features this camera has to offer and this allows me to effectively control the level of lightness or darkness I want in the final image while shooting in Shutter Priority Mode and Aperture Priority Mode and is a good strategy before I'm forced to increase the ISO level thereby helping to keep noise levels to a minimum. In Shutter Priority Mode the camera automatically selects the aperture value. While Aperture Priority Mode is an excellent way to get great photos with this camera,  I mostly focus on single subjects in my photography, like birds, so depth of field isn't as important to me and I'm able to control light entering the camera in other ways. I specifically set an exposure compensation value for every shot I take. Although the values might change slightly from shot to shot, and depend on the amount of bright sulight striking the subect, they're usually in the minus range of say, -1.3 to -1.0, or lower in some cases. This is critical to the style and "look" of what I want in an image. I prefer a slightly "darker tone" in my images and along with keeping the ISO values as close to ISO 80 or ISO 100 as possible, this is how I achieve images with such deep and rich color chiefly because I'm preventing the  camera from producing an overexposed image.  This is especially how I capture fine feather detail in white feathered birds such as egrets. Many small sensor point-and-shoot cameras tend to "overexpose" the image resulting in "blown-out highlights"  producing  images that often lack nice color quality and sharpness so I intentionally "underexpose" the image a bit and get exactly what I desire. The results simply look more dramatic and naturally sharper, in my opinion. In post-processing the only "correction" I ever really need to make is a one-click "Auto Contrast" in Photoshop Elements. I never have to sharpen an image. Each image on my website will display the actual settings used for that particular photo and is a good way to see the shutter speeds and the exposure compensation settings that were used, as well. Finally, I like the results I get using Center-Weighted- Average Metering.
    So far, these are the core settings I've been using:
    “Recording Pixel Setting" (Image Size) is set to "L" for LARGE 12M 4000x3000 & "Compression Ratio" (Image Quality) is set to "SUPERFINE JPEG." I use Continuous Auto-Focus, Auto-Focus Frame: FlexiZone, Center-Weighted-Average Metering, Spot AE is set to Center. I stay as close to ISO 80 or 100 as possible, although this camera seems to do quite well with slightly higher ISO values with regard to visible "noise."  High ISO NR is set to "Standard" and I NEVER USE AUTO ISO. Image Stabilization is set to: Continuous, and I select the appropriate white-balance PRESET icon for the particular weather condition, and I never use the "AWB" preset icon. I prefer to shoot using Burst Mode. I do not use i-Contrast, Dynamic Range Correction or Shadow Correction, either.
    Since I DO NOT use "Custom Colors," settings regarding Sharpness, Contrast, and Saturation remain at their Default (ZERO) points, so therefore, I have not pressed any buttons to increase these values beyond their factory defaults. I shoot all my photographs via the LCD which remains at the factory default brightness. This should cover most of the main settings I use and I'll have to dig deeper into the menus to see if there are some new settings or features in the SX50 I haven't noticed yet.
    Hopefully, this introduction will prove helpful if you're interested in trying a different approach with your SX50. To be sure, there are many ways to get good results from this camera and this is simply how I prefer to do it! Can't wait to see the pictures from your trip!
    Best regards,
    Tony
    Tony Britton Photography

  • Few 5DmkII RAW files do not open with Aperture, but OK with other software

    Hi, I have two RAW files which I cannot import with Apple Aperture. The files open fine with Canon Digital Photo Professional, Raw Photo Processor and dcraw (and with various programs on my Windows 7 laptop) and I'm able to create TIFF files from the RAW files with every other software.
    Detail about the files:
    A. they are two first frames of burst (used auto bracketing, which takes 3 images in burst mode, to create HDR image)
    B. there is nothing strange in the files, they are normal RAW files and file size is normal as well (other 28.4MB and 32.7MB)
    C. both files process OK in above mentioned softwares and there are no blocks missing from created TIFF images, also preview JPG in the RAW file is OK
    D. Mac OS X Quick view (press spacebar in Finder) and Preview do show these two RAW images well (I assume they use the embedded JPG image)
    I have installed all the updates available in "Apple icon" -> "Software update..." function. Therefore I have Apple Aperture version 3.0.2. Computer is MacPro:
    Model Name: Mac Pro
    Model Identifier: MacPro3,1
    Processor Name: Quad-Core Intel Xeon
    Processor Speed: 2.8 GHz
    Number Of Processors: 2
    Total Number Of Cores: 8
    L2 Cache (per processor): 12 MB
    Memory: 12 GB
    Bus Speed: 1.6 GHz
    Boot ROM Version: MP31.006C.B05
    SMC Version (system): 1.25f4
    How I can submit the files for Apple to create fix? I searched for Apple Aperture support but there is only this forum, no email address or anything. Do they read this forum?

    Some clarifications and answers to your questions:
    First to Tony Gay:
    I try the feedback later today even they claim "Please know that while we do read these submissions, we cannot guarantee a personalized response.", which is original reason why I'm why I wrote this question here. The url you provided did not work but this should:
    http://www.apple.com/support/feedback
    This is not relevant to sRAW files, I did not change the between camera taking automated bracketed shots the image format for 2 shots to sRAW and took 3rd with RAW, that is not even possible.
    I have copied the images from card to hard drive, not trying to read from the card itself. However now you mention tried also from card = exactly same result. Tried desktop (different HD) and external USB and external eSata, all same result.
    Get info doesn't show anything wierd for the images. All other 192 RAWs from same shoot were imported with exact same methodology (as well as 60000 images before that).
    Then to gosuk2:
    There is no HDR setting in camera, I took the images FOR HDR, but did not use any specific setting, just used 1 1/3 stop bracketing and 2 second times when camera automatically takes 1 1/3 underexposed, correct exposure and 1 1/3 overexposed image (the order of images can naturally be changed via custom function in camera). All this is unrelevant since I shoot quite often HDR with this method (=more than 500 images each month) this way and they have always been fine before these two images.
    I see the files in import panel and I the don't use import dublicates setting so that doesn't affect the situation (why it would, Aperture things files are broken).
    Again HDR cannot be combined in 5DmkII, it's just automatically shoot 3 bracketed shots.
    No I don't get same result no matter what I do, it's just these two files. My other ~5000 HDR bracketed RAWs are importing fine as well as all burst/shots taken in continous shooting mode.
    I'm very aware how stacking of images works, but I do not understand relevance to this issue. I can not import the images at all to Apple Aperture, after importing all images Aperture displays dialog saying that following files could not be imported to Aperture, then displays list with both of these files in the list and gives possibility to locate the files in Finder.
    I have used Aperture since version 1 and I have 70000 images imported successfully to Aperture. Earlier I have seen this dialog "Aperture could not import image" only after hard drive/card failure. However then images cannot be used in Canon's DPP (Digital Photo Professional) or any other RAW software - now the problem ONLY EXISTS in Aperture all other RAW converters are able to open and process SUCCESSFULLY these images.
    So I'm not whining that Aperture is not good, but if it starts to work only part of the images in future and I have to process rest of the images with Canon DPP (that program is really lousy on usability standpoint) then I'm not so happy with Aperture anymore.
    Will report here if I get any comments back from Apple through the Feebback tool.
    Message was edited by: vahonen (due to forum software replacing words like s u c k s etc. with ***)
    Message was edited by: vahonen

  • What is the best workflow for Ultimate Sharpening w PSE 8?

    I shoot a lot of flowers close up and also birds. Both have lots of detail, feathers or stamen, so I rely heavily on sharpening. With birds, sometimes they are flying or distant or both which makes it challenging to get the pics sharp. Recently I have learned more about sharpening and now I am suffering from, "The more I know, the more I know I don't know." Also, some of my information is based on rumor and I would really appreciate any advice. How about if I discuss my workflow and ask some questions here and there.
    I shoot RAW with a Canon 7D and I almost always downsize my pics to nnnn x 1080 for this conversation, lets assume I always do this downsizing. I've heard that downsized pics should never be sharpened until after they are downsized. Is this true? Should I set all of the ACR sharpening sliders to zero? Should I also keep the Clarity slider low in ACR or is it more mid-tone contrast and less sharpening? Is there another way to improve Clarity in PSE, not ACR?
    When I am done with ACR and open in Elements, the first thing I do is crop and resize using Image, Resize, Bicubic Sharper. Then I fix blemishes. Next I select out the subject(s) and adjust with Color Curves and then Luminous Sharpening which seems to give me better results than Enhance- Adjust Sharpness. (After two years of using Elements I just found this Luminous sharpening and it is so good. I sure wish I would have notice that in Brundage's book earlier. I makes me wonder what else I am missing.) After the Luminous Sharpening should I try High Pass sharpening additionally or any other kind of sharpening? Are there any rules of thumb on when what type of sharpening works best in which application? For example, I heard another rumor that sharpening highlights or dark shadows just increases noise. Is there a good way to handle those situations, like select them out or use a special blend mode?
    After I am done with the subject, I usually inverse to the background and de-noise and/or blurr and desaturate to punch up the subject.
    Is full Photoshop required to get the best sharpening tools or is the sharpening similar and other aspects are more powerful? I use so little of Elements 8 that I would assume and hope that Photoshop or Lightroom would be overkill at this point.
    Thank you for reviewing this! If you can think of any way I could improve I would really appreciate any comments.
    Doug

    Hi Barbara,
    I am humbled to be communicating with someone who wrote such and incredible book! Ok, enough blathering.
    This will also answer Andrewzaye's question about output.
    Maybe I shouldn't be resampling but here is my rationale. Most of my best pics I like to show occasionally on my HTDV which has a resolution of 1920x 1080. I resample my pics to get them down to that 1080 vertical resolution so that they will fit the native resolution of the screen. (The sides often don't extend the full 1920 but I don't have a problem with the black space on the sides.) This is based on my believe that images on LCDs look best at the LCDs native resolution (and I like to think I know about this because, as a sales mgr for Toshiba, I used to sell notebook computer LCDs by the tens of thousands to big computer companies.) Sometimes I resample and downsize again to email pics as n x 680. It seems to work fine with decent results but I am certainly open to suggestion.
    If I eventually decide to print out a photo, it will be to hang on a wall and for that I save the original CR2 file and the post ACR dng files. If I like something enough to print it, I don't mind editing it again and making sure I am getting it as good as possible. Of course I would keep as much resolution as possible for printing.
    Ok, those are my excuses. I would love to hear your thoughts on my sharpening questions.
    Doug

  • Best workflow using DNG files from Odyssey 7Q in Premiere 8.1

    Finally, the magenta highlights issue has been fixed in this new 8.1 version of Premiere - lovely! :-)
    I'm wondering though, what the best workflow is when using 2K/4K raw dng image sequences from the Odyssey7Q? In this case, shot on the Sony FS700.
    Is there a simple and easy way to batch import a bunch of clips?
    The behavior of the Media Browser in Premiere is a little different than the last version... When you choose the individual dng clip folders it now shows one single dng sequence files instead of a bunch of individual png images. But you still have to browse to each clip folder and choose the dng sequence file. If you just choose the root that contains the clip folders or if you choose multiple clip folders, it will import the content of those folders as individual dng image files! Pretty annoying...
    Does anyone know of a better way to import where you don't have to choose each clip manually?
    Also, how do you bring a PP edit sequence into AE for ACR processing? You can't copy/paste the files and you can't choose "Replace With After Effects Composition" - those two methods will just import one single DNG frame into AE.
    You can import a whole PP project into AE but that will just show the entire PP sequence as one single file. You can't access the individual clips or open it in ACR.
    The best method I know of is export all the DNG sequences as proxies, edit the material using the proxies on PP timeline, copy/paste that into an AE comp and then manually replace each of the used proxy files with the original DNG files, which will open up the ACR. But that's a bit of a hassle...
    Is there any way of taking advantage of the full dynamic range of the DNG files in Premiere? When I bring down and overexposed image using either fast color correction or by right-clicking on a clip and choosing "source settings..." and using the exposure slider, the image looks "flat" but when I do the same thing using the ACR, I can reintroduce the details otherwise lost in the overexposure.
    Any info or advice on this will be greatly appreciated

    Hi EyelightKasper,
    See if this method will work for you: Re: How to import multiple DNG files into Premiere
    Thanks!
    Kevin

  • LSD problem in Lenovo B450

    So, im wrote all history about problems with this problem....
    When i, take this laptop, him have problem with KBC controller, Battery not charging and Keyboard not work...
    im open case and view mainboard, damage component's will be not found...
    LSD panel will disconect and connect LCD Monitor to RGB cable, Image will good, im load Bios Flash in official site, and flush bios.. KBC run work.. Battary will charge and keyboard now work... (LCD panel will disconnect)
    When im connect LCD panel image in LCD panel have colored spectors,  all the colors flowed and turned into Spector, when this LCD panel will connect another notebook, im see what LCD panel will Show normal image, and im think about lcd cable and by him, when cable will be change image some correctly but not normal...
    Ask me please where im can find older bios flash? maybe this bios not correctly work in lcd panel???

    This is the only bios I could find on the lenovo website. http://consumersupport.lenovo.com/us/en/DriversDow​nloads/drivers_show_2109.html
    IT Specialist and Consultant
    Lenovo Tablet Evangelist
    Current Machines: IdeaCentre A300, ThinkPad Tablet, IdeaPad U410, and Yoga 3 Pro Touch
    Deutsche Community   Comunidad en Español
    Lenovo - the latest in DOtabs, DOpads, DOcentre's, DOstations and DOservers!

Maybe you are looking for