Partial Delivery should not go for credit hold.

Hi All,
When we are creating Partial delivery it is going on credit hold. I want the solution for this so that credit check does not happen at Delivery level.
Please find the OVA8 settings Mentained below.
Check                   Reaction      Status/Block
Dynamic                   C                 Checked               Horizon   15 T
NextReviewDate         A                 Checked              Number of Days      30
Open Item                 C                 Checked              Max.Open.tem %    10   NoDays openI   15
OldestOpenitem         A                 Checked              Days oldestItem     120
Please suggest for the same.
Thanks

Hi,
Partial delivery is a exclusion scenario. For this, we have to use credit check user exits. Detailed documentation of the user exit for credit managment is given below. This will help you to achieve solution.
We can write logic based on VBAP & LIPS table delivered quantity details.
User Exits For Credit Checks And Risk Management
Credit Check
If you want to carry out your own individual credit checks, that differ from those in the standard system, you must define them in the following user exits:
LVKMPTZZ
LVKMPFZ1: USER_CREDIT_CHECK1
LVKMPFZ2: USER_CREDIT_CHECK2
LVKMPFZ3: USER_CREDIT_CHECK3
User exit for availability check
User exit USEREXIT_AVAIL_CHECK_CREDIT exists in Include MV45AFZF.
This user exit allows you to determine whether the system should or should not carry out an availability check after a blocked document has been released or after a new credit check
Regards,
Shabeer

Similar Messages

Credit block should not require for Credit card paid sales order

Dear friends,
my client want that sales oder with credit card payment should not block sales order for credit management reasons. Hoe can it be configured.
Regards
rdc

Are you using credit card processing in SAP to get the authorization?
If you are then the authorization should not block the order.
Or are you using credit card as a form of payment (without authorization) in which case this needs to be put on the customers account as a payment and then the order entered.
Where are you holding the credit card details?

STO delivery should not happen for shelf life expired material

Hai all,
When we are doing PGI for STO-PO. shelf life expired material should not do the delivery.The system should give the error message. but in our system when we do PGI the shelf life expired material is deliverying.
how do we maintain the error message when we doing PGI.
Edited by: hemanth s on Sep 12, 2008 9:37 AM

Hi,
In Inventory management there is a which helps you "Set expiration Date Check". This allows you to make sure that the shelf life of the material is checked before delivery.
In Material master, you would need to enter relevant information in the "Plant Data/Stor. 1" tab page (Min remaining shelf life, total shelf life). Also in IMG settings, you need to activate the check for both Plant and movement type. The path is as follows:
IMG Settings > Material Management > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory > Goods Receipt > Set Expiration Date Check. TCode: OMJ5
Cheers.
Edited by: Sowmya Mohan on Sep 15, 2008 8:43 AM

Credit Card payment does not go on Credit hold..

Hi,
As per our normal procedure whenever a customer makes payment through "Credit Card" it goes on Credit Hold and than someone releases it from VKM1.
Now the problem we are facing is that suppose SO is of $1000 on 22/07/2009 and delivery is for only $600 on this day than as per our normal process the relaeser can only release $600 from VKM1. But this is not happening now, entire amount of $ 1000 is getting released on 22/07/2009 itself.
Kindly suggest how we can restrict this.
Thanks,

Hello Vk@sap,
In the standard process when you enter payment card details the order should not go on credit hold. VBAP-ABGES will be filled with 1 and the credit check should not be done. When we have an order that will be paid for by credit card all we need to know is if the clearing house (bank/credit card company) will give us the money. The customer's credit limit and history is not important to us if the bank guarantees us they will give us the money.
Is the authorisation being sought for $1000 or $600 in the sales order? Is it just the first schedule line that is being authorised in the sales order? In the standard system you cannot split an authorisation. So if you receive an authorisation for $1000 and only deliver $600 when you go to bill this the entire authorisation is used up. You will need to re-authorise the sales order (transaction VCC1) for the other $400.
I hope this helps.
Best regards,
Ian Kehoe

PIR should not consume for the SubReq

Hi Guru's,
Please help me how to configure the planning strategy for my below requirement.
Currently i am procuring a HALB material thru subcontracting. This HALB is having BOM components. I need to send the BOM components to the vendor for assembly.
The BOM components will be used in some other HALB also. My requirement is, the BOM components should not consume for the subcontracting requirements, it needs to consume for in house production only.
The subcon requirement needs to generate the dependent requirements only, it should consume the PIR.
Currently i am using the planning strategy 70, requirement type VSFB. In this, PIR is consuming for the SubReq.
Please suggest me the suitable planning strategy for this scenario.
Thanks & Regards,
V. Suresh

Suresh,
I am curious why you would not want SubReq. It is also a different kind of dependent requirement. Also it seems yo are supplying the components to your vendor. So it makes sense that your forecast is consumed by dependent requirements so that planning is effective.
If for any reason you do not want to supply components to vendor then it would be best to mark such components as vendor provided. In such cases it would not consume your forecast (PIR). Hope this gives some new perspective.
Thanks,
Ram

PO should not go for approval if it is from a contract

Dear Gurus,
This company wants to approve the contract but the POs created from that contract should not go for approval again. Please give an idea to achieve this requirement?
Thanks,
Chameendri

Hi,
We need to define Contract under characteristics of PO approval process goto SPRO > Materials Management > Purchase Order > Release Procedure fro Purchase Orders > Edit Class
Enter Class : for example POREL , class type 032 > Char tab
Enter POCONTRACT under characteristics
Enter Contract Number under description
Enter CHAR under Data Type
Enter 10 under No.of characters and 0 under decimal places
Then go to PO release strategy > Classification
Enter Contract Number under characteristic Description and Value leave it blank
this is what we did in our company and it is working fine.
POs created with referece to approved contract is not triggering to approval process again.
I dont know whether you are still waiting for the answer.
Please try and let us know the results, if it works.
Thanks.
Udaya

With out goods issue for order system should not allow for order confirmati

Dear all
with out goods issue system should not allow for order/operation confirmation.
how it is possible.
Regrads
Srinivas

Dear ,
In some cases we required to do confirmation or TECO without GI .
We can change it as per req using user exit
Regards,
Ishwar

How do I call the subvi in parallel with main VI. Main vi should not wait for the subvi

I have a subvi which takes the parameters like port name, transmit rate, message to transmit over serial port and Start/stop flag. This subvi calls VISA write vi in a loop continuously, till the Start/Stop flag is false, to write a message to serial port at a mentioned transmit rate. This subvi will be called from another VI. Actual intension is to transmit different messages to different ports continuously and stop them when required. In this senario, please provide solution for below points:
1. How do I call the subvi in parallel with main VI. Main vi should not wait for the subvi.
2. How does main vi can control already running subvi in parallel to it. In the above example I would like to start the subvi from main vi when start\stop flag is true and would like to stop it when the flag is false.
3. How do I call the subVI with one set of parameters from main vi, when same subVI is running with other set of parameters already from main vi(subvi being called in a case with different set of parameters each time when the case is called). Means, how do I keep track of reentrant subvi (different calls to same vi)from the same main vi.

Hi Dharani24,
Try if these are helpful,
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/DB92C44E7D4D8A1B862577CB007D9C45
http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361J-01/lvconcepts/asynchronous_vi_calls/
http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361J-01/lvconcepts/reentrancy/
Thanks
uday,
Please Mark the solution as accepted if your problem is solved and help author by clicking on kudoes
Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer (CLAD) Using LV13

Without result recording closing system should not allow for usage decesion

Hi
without result recording closing system should not allow for usage decision.I think it is possible through user status. Please tell the procedure .
Thanks and regards,
vairavan

Dear vairavan,
You can check for the authorisation object.I can't remember that authoriation object right now.But surely you can restrict that with authorisation object.
Anyone knows the authoristaion object.
Regards,
Sunil Patil

Delivery qty not correct for partial delivery

Hi, I met some issues need your help!
1) Create a sales order base on the sales bom.
2) Current stock and supply is not available for the required delivery date.
3) According to the current stock or supply qty.only confirm partial qty for the components.
    eg.
    the structure of this sales bom as below:
    Material: A 1PC --> B 1PC
    Material: A 1PC --> C 1PC
    After ATP check ,the result as below.
    item 10   mateiral A (Header)          100PC   ( not relevent for inventory)
    item 20   mateiral B(component)     100PC   confirmed 30PC
    item 30   material C(component)     100PC. confirmed 10PC
4) Create delivery(partial delivery) with the selection date.
5) We can find the component quantity is correct but the header quantity is incorrect.

Hi
Configure the field 'Create Delivery Group' in the item category of BOM (VOV7) in the Bill of Material/Configuration area. Please go thro the F1 help details of that field..
Form delivery group and correlate BOM components
Here you can determine whether sub-items that belong to a main item, and which resulted from a BOM explosion, are to be combined in a delivery group.
Use
You use a delivery group to determine a common delivery date for all the items that it contains. If you double the quantity ordered for the main item, then the order quantity for the sub-item will also be doubled.
Indicator X means that a delivery date is created for the delivery group. The system uses the last date (chronologically) of an item in this group to create the schedule line date.
Indicator A means that the system generates correlated schedule lines. If no complete delivery is required, as soon as all the items in a bill of material are available, the system creates a correlated schedule line. On the first date, when all items in a bill of material are available, a confirmed quantity is issued.
Thanks,
Ravi

Ref2 on JE not populated for Credit Memos not based on another document

Version: (2007A)
Description of requirements: (Please provide a detailed description)
When the Setting in System Initialization\Document Settings \General tab\
Document Remarks Include is set to BP Reference Number, the Ref2 field on the Journal Entry for the document is populated with the BP Reference from the document. This is true for all documents, regardless of whether or not the document is based on another document, EXCEPT for AR and AP Credit Memos. In the case of Credit Memos, if the Credit Memo isnu2019t based on another document, the BP Reference isnu2019t written to the Ref2 field on itu2019s Journal Entry. Our customers have complained that this makes it very difficult for them to do their reconciliations as the Ref2 is blank on the reconciliations screen for these Credit Memos. If the Ref2 field were populated in the same manner as other documents, the Ref2 Field would contain the same BP Reference as the invoice(s) it should be reconciled with. We have been asked to request that this functionality be added in a future patch, as it would greatly simplify the customeru2019s reconciliation and save them a great deal of time and effort.
Business needs: (Please describe the impact on your business, if the functionality is not realized)
It is very difficult to reconcile our Credit Memos with the correct documents, as there is no reference available on the screen to connect them to the other documents. This requires a great deal of time researching which Credit Memo(s) should be reconciled with which Invoice(s).
Examples: (Please describe a typical example, how the functionality should work.)
When a Credit Memo (Purchase or Sales) not based on another document is created, the Ref2 field on the Journal Entry should be updated with BP Reference entered by the user on the Credit Memo.
Current Workaround: (Please describe the workarounds you are using at the moment)
None. Hours wasted trying to reconcile correctly.
Proposed solution: (Please suggest how the new functionality should work)
When a Credit Memo (Purchase or Sales) not based on another document is created, the Ref2 field on the Journal Entry should be updated with BP Reference entered by the user on the Credit Memo.
Regards,
Sally Weinrauch
Coastal Range Systems

hi,
so change field status group with trx <b>OB41</b>
A.

Order document with immediate delivery create not working with credit block

A sales order document is configured to create the delivery immediately on save. This works fine if credit is not an issue.
If the order goes on credit block and released, the delivery is not created. I realize that the reason is that the credit personnel do not have authority to create the delivery (although it is the system really doing it).
Does anyone have solution to this via standard method?

Hi Anabella,
This is a classical problem.
If you want the delivery to be created automatically, you can disable the credit check at the sales order level, and enable the Credit check at PGI level. This way the delivery will be automatically created in all the cases, but the PGI will not happen if there is a credit check failure. Now the authorised individual can act on this and release the delivery for further processing.
Otherwise, it is expected for the sales order not to create delivery if there is a credit check failure. Whether the delivery creation is automatic(immediate) or manual(VL01 or delivery due list), the delivery creation will be disabled, if the sales order fails the credit check.
Hope this helps

Delivery should not create with out company code data

Hi all,
We have created a customer master without company code data with T code VD01 and subsequently created sales order and delivery with PGI and invoice also saved but no accounting document is getting generated. But we want to stop at delivery only; system should not allow creating delivery. Please do the needful
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Nagesh

hi nagesh,.
from standard SAP it might not be possible.
but check this work around:
after creating the COMPANY CODE DATA by the marketing people only you please go ahead and create a delivery till that time the sales order will be in open status.
if you want to stop it through the SAP system:
then you need to contact TECHNICAL PERSON on the same:
MV45AFZZ : USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE for checking while creating a delivery if not created then to throw an ERROR message - this is the only probability to check
but he may not be having solution for your query.
except the work around.
please check and confirm
balajia

Sales Order Not Checked for Credit Limit

Most of the time, in our course of business, the customer account and BP/Credit limit are setup prior to the input of any order.
However, if in the case the customer was setup (BP created in background, but segment/credit limit not assigned yet), and an order was created immediately the order will not be checked for credit.
We are considering putting a check in the order that it must be checked or it is considered incomplete.
We have a background job that runs every few hours to assign the BP to the credit segment (we have only one credit segment, in addition to 0000) and give a default credit limit. But we need to ensure that all orders are checked.
How are others handling this situation?
Thanks

We have already put in place the use of a background job to create the BP/segment with a default credit limit.
We are hoping to come up with a method that is full proof and not manual.
Depending on how frequently the job runs and the timing between that and setting up a customer master record and entry of a sales order, there could be a sales order entered before the background job was completed.

New release strategy should not trgger for PO released with old Rel Strategy

Hi All,
Please suggest. Po has been fully released with Release Strtgy V1 XX. Now I m replacing release strategy XX with ZZ. If I change any po which has old rel str XX , system will reset new release strategy as in config changeability indicator 4 maintained.
But requirement is if there is any change or value decreasing in fully released Pos with old strategy it should not retrigger new release strategy. If value Increases then New strategy should retrigger.
Please help me on this.
regards,
Rohit

HI Rohit
A reset of the release strategy only takes place if
       - the changeability of the release indicator is set to '4' in
          case of a purchase requisition and '4' or '6' in case of
          another purchasing document (purchase order, request for
          quotation, contract, scheduling agreement),
       - the document is still subject to the previous release
          strategy,
       - the new TOTAL NET ORDER VALUE is higher than the old one.
The most important thing to consider in to avoid changes to release strategy customizing once the release strategy is used.
The commom steps are:
1- make sure all of the old POs should have been released.
2- don't delete/change the original release strategy. create a new release strategy with copy function, then the old release strategy will not be replaced.
3- if you delete the original release strategy and add a new release strategy which the characteristics in classification is same as old release strategy then the PO (have been approved) will be replaced with the new release strategy.
Kind regards,
Lorraine

Partial Delivery should not go for credit hold.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for