Problem with ORG Determination in Transactions
I am having an issue with ORG determination in Business Transactions
The Organization area is not being populated as required.
I want to pull in the org data from the User (Org data set in Sales Area section of the BP), all users have the same org data, when running the transaction this is not working, this used to work ok but no longer does??
Settings in org data profile is set to '14000146 - Org. Unit Using Transaction Type', this brings back two errors:
1 - No organizational units found
2 - No organizational unit could be selected
I have tried using the 10000194 - UserOrgUnit but this causes a pricing determination error relating to config
any ideas anyone??
regards
Barry
Hello Barry,
To use rule 14000146, you need to add the used transaction type as an attribute of the org. unit that you want it to be determined.
To do this, please execute t-cd ppoma_crm, open your org. unit, go to the [Attributes] tab, add the transaction type into the 'Transaction Type' attibute, then check on 'Obj. permitted in determination' save.
Wiith rule 10000194 you got the org. unit determined. For the pricing error, I think it might be related to the pricing procedure determination. If yes, please check your IMG activity:
SPRO
- CRM
- Basic Functions
- Pricing
- Pricing in the Business Transaction
- Determine Pricing Procedures
Here, the Sales organization, Dis. Channel, Division are the org. data determined in the transaction; the Doc. Pricing Procedure is the one defined in the transaction type (IMG activity: Define Transaction Types->Assignment of Business Transaction Categories-> BUS2000115 -> Customizing header -> field 'Doc. Pric.Proc.'); the Cust. Pricing Procedure is taken from the sold-to party's BP master sales area data (in the billing) tab.
Hope the information could be helpful.
Best regards,
Maggie
Similar Messages
-
Problem with use of COM+ Transaction and DB Transaction
Problem with use of COM+ Transaction and DB Transaction
We build a Web site that use sometime COM+ Transaction and sometime DB
Transaction. If we use a COM+ Transaction and a few seconds later we try to use
a Database Transaction (OracleConnection.BeginTransaction), we get the error
Connection is already part of a local or a distributed transaction
Of course the error does not produce everytime; it takes some try before we get
the problem. And of course, if i use pooling=false on the connection string,
the problem does not appear.
i run the Web page
and push the COM+ Transaction and DB Transaction one after the other for some
times and the problem should appear.
Environment: Windows server 2003, .Net Framework 1.1, ODP.Net 9.2.0.401,
Database Server 9.2.0.4> Why in form builder can't I...
Is this happening at runtime or at buildtime? You'll need to provide more info on what you are actually doing that's causing the problem.
Regards,
Robin Zimmermann
Forms Product Management -
Problem with Account determination
Hi all.
I have a problem with account determination when I change some data in Tcode VKOA.
For example:
I made changes in VKOA to determine G/L account 0000523201 and it worked it.
But in the account document the account that is displayed is different (0000501000) and I don´t know why.
I checked the Analysis Account Determination in VF03 and the system found the correct account in the access sequence, but I realized that there is a second line with the message G/L account in document 0000501000 . Where do I determine this account, or how Can I fix it ?
Thanks for any help.
RenatoHi reanto
Check in VKOA all the G/L accounts for all the respective account keys. Also check wheather any provisional G/L account have been maintained or not. for any account key
Also check wheather twice if you have maintained for the same account key different G/L accounts
Regards
Srinath -
Problem in Org determination rule
hi all,
i have postal codes assigned to the org model as attributes,(ie) the org unit is responsible for that postal code only, i have created org determination rule by selecting the postal code as an attribute, i have created bp in which i have mentioned one of the postal code which is in the org model,
when i run transaction i need only the org unit to be picked and shown based on the postal code mentioned in the BP , now it is showing all the orgunits which i dont need,
please suggest me what setting i have to do.
its urgentHi shalini,
while simulating the rule in pfac, i am able to get the correct org unit for the pincode, while running the transaction my problem is still the same getting all org units in the pop up, i am sure i have correct org rule assigned to org profile and profile to transaction.
to be clear, my requirement is, for a transaction type, i have defined prt functions "customer" and 'employee responsible' in UI interface setting of prt detr procedure. here the employee responsible should not be the user creating the transaction. this should be the org unit "sales group" which is having certain pincodes assigned in org model, the same value which is populated in sales group field should be populated in 'Emp responsilbe' field in UI of transaction type.
here my first problem is i am getting all the org units for the selection when running the transaction, where user doesnt know which org unit should be selected for the customer belonging to the particular pincode.
if i get value sales group field how can i get this value populated to Employee responsible field in UI
suggest me how can i achieve this.
ITS URGENT -
Problems with the batch in transaction MB1A and MB21
Hi everybody, I am new in the MM module. I am having a problem with transaction MB1A and MB21, when i try to select a batch for the movement 901. if i click the match code for the material's batch, the system shows me all the batches for the material, but some of these batches don't have available quantity stock and order creates the reservation or the material output. The system dont allow negative stock. Do you have any idea of this problem? Regards.
Hi,
In IM, when you select a batch with possibile entries, system always shows the available batches no matter whether stock is there are not.
However, if you setup batch determination strategy for example, when you are processing in MB1A, SAP fills the batch based on the criterion you define in:
MBC1Logistics -->Materials Management -->Inventory Management -->Environment -->Batch Search Strategy -->MBC1 - Create
Select appropriate strategy (if defined in your system, say for mvt ty)
maintain search strategy and sort criteria for your movement type here.
Hope this helps! -
Org determination in transaction based on custom Partner Function
Hi All,
I am trying to figure out how can I modify the partner determination procedure and org data profile to determine the sales area (org,dc,div,so,sg) in a transaction automatically without having to choose the sales org.
Here is the set up:
Sales Org ->Soff->Sales group are permitted for Org determination in ppoma_crm.
Custom Partner Functions - Y1 and Y2 assigned to Sales Partner Function Category
Access Sequence YXXX has the following set up:
Source PF Function Category Usage
10 COM_PARTNER_A
20 CRM_PARTNER_C Sold to Party
30 CRM_PARTNER_C Activity Partner CRM
40 CRM_PARTNER_C Sales Prospect
50 CRM_PARTNER_C Activity Partner
Partner Procedure YPP001 has the following setup:
Function Access Sequence
14 User Recurring
15 YXXX Recurring
21 0001 Recurring
23 YXXX Recurring
Y001 Recurring
Y002 Recurring
Y1 YXXX Recurring
Y2 YXXX Recurring
Org Data Profile YORGPROF01 is maintained for Scenario SALES with Org Model Deter Rule 10000177. Sorg and Dc mandatory set.
The transaction type YOPP is configured as shown:
Org Profile YORGPROF01
Partn Func Org Activity Partner
Partner Determination Proc YPP001
Now here is the issue:
We want that when we create transaction YOPP it should fill the Org data including Sales Office and Sales group from the partner associated with the PF Y1 which gets assigned automatically when the account is selected on the transaction.
With the above setting, it populates all the sales offices and sales groups that have been marked for determination in ppoma_crm (which we don't want it to do). We need it marked for determination so the BP's master data associated with Y1 shows up the sales group and sales office.
When the account is selected on the transaction and Y1 is determined via partner determination, we would want the sales Org also to get determined automatically from the Y1 partner's master data.
Anything that can be changed in the above settings to make this happen?
Thanks
PCHi
Although i have no practical experience with this but an educated guess would be to use Partner function determination . If you have 'employee responsible ' PF , Then u can further use him for org determination.
May be this helps...
Regards
Ruchi -
Problem with text determination procedure
here we r finding text determinations procedures for purchase order in spro - img conflagration as follows materialmanagement-purchasing-messages-text for messages-define text for po.by going here i had a view where both header and item text for different po is maintained.
now i want this text to be printed in my purchase order every time with different item selected there should be different item text should be selected.
1. the major problem when inserting into medruck form as insert-text-standard text, here it selecting the text object as TEXT BUT FOR DIFFERENT MATERIALS IT SHOULD SELECT MATERIAL as text object then only i can retrieve the material text's.
if any one can forward a document r help to solve this problem and solution suggestions.
this is a very important requirement.pls forward it as early as possible,
thanx with regards...
hareesh tadepalliRaj,
Thanks for your suggestion. This would be a possiblity going forward, but we have existing tickets that would still be missing the interaction text. This apparently worked before we upgraded to SP 14, so I don't think there is a problem with our configuration.
I created some new test tickets, and found that the interaction text is still being copied and saved in the ticket log, even after text is added to the ticket. The problem is that the interaction text is not visible from IC Web. It is visible when looking at the ticket in the SAP GUI (transaction CRMD_ORDER).
For example, here is the contents of the Log text as seen in SAP GUI (I use "TICKET" or "INTERACTION" in the text to indicate where the text originated):
General Note
06/03/2009 11:14:36 M305755
TICKET - general note
General Note
06/03/2009 11:13:59 M305755
INTERACTION - general note
Technical Problem
06/03/2009 11:13:59 M305755
INTERACTION - technical problem
Here is the contents of the Log text as seen in IC Web:
General Note
06/03/2009 11:14:36 M305755
TICKET - general note
Martin -
Problem with ALV_GRID and CALL TRANSACTION.
Hi all, Could you please tell me
At SE38
Why REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY and CALL TRANSACTION after called then I click the back button to return to the calling program but it automatic return to the source code? (it hasn't saves the data in alv grid )
In another case of this program, after automatic return to the source code then I have to waiting for 5-10 mins for execute again cuz if immediately execute the program don't fill any data to the alv grid.
I have problem with a simple source code like this
REPORT ZFS_ALV_DEMO.
TYPE-POOLS: slis.
DATA: itab LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF aufk WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: gs_selfield TYPE slis_selfield "Information cursor position ALV
, w_aufnr LIKE aufk-aufnr. "Order Number
SELECT * FROM aufk INTO TABLE itab WHERE autyp = 40. "//Process Order
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY'
EXPORTING
i_structure_name = 'aufk'
i_callback_program = sy-cprog
i_callback_user_command = 'USER_COMMAND_COR3'
TABLES
t_outtab = itab
EXCEPTIONS
program_error = 1
OTHERS = 2.
FORM user_command_cor3 USING u_ucomm LIKE sy-ucomm
us_selfield TYPE slis_selfield."#EC CALLED
CASE u_ucomm.
WHEN '&IC1'.
gs_selfield = us_selfield.
IF gs_selfield-fieldname = 'AUFNR'.
SET PARAMETER ID 'ANR' FIELD gs_selfield-value.
CALL TRANSACTION 'COR3' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
ELSE.
MESSAGE w208(00) WITH 'Select by Order only!'.
ENDIF.
ENDCASE.
ENDFORM.Hi all, Could you please tell me
At SE38
Why REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY and CALL TRANSACTION after called then I click the back button to return to the calling program but it automatic return to the source code? (it hasn't saves the data in alv grid )
In another case of this program, after automatic return to the source code then I have to waiting for 5-10 mins for execute again cuz if immediately execute the program don't fill any data to the alv grid.
I have problem with a simple source code like this
REPORT ZFS_ALV_DEMO.
TYPE-POOLS: slis.
DATA: itab LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF aufk WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: gs_selfield TYPE slis_selfield "Information cursor position ALV
, w_aufnr LIKE aufk-aufnr. "Order Number
SELECT * FROM aufk INTO TABLE itab WHERE autyp = 40. "//Process Order
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY'
EXPORTING
i_structure_name = 'aufk'
i_callback_program = sy-cprog
i_callback_user_command = 'USER_COMMAND_COR3'
TABLES
t_outtab = itab
EXCEPTIONS
program_error = 1
OTHERS = 2.
FORM user_command_cor3 USING u_ucomm LIKE sy-ucomm
us_selfield TYPE slis_selfield."#EC CALLED
CASE u_ucomm.
WHEN '&IC1'.
gs_selfield = us_selfield.
IF gs_selfield-fieldname = 'AUFNR'.
SET PARAMETER ID 'ANR' FIELD gs_selfield-value.
CALL TRANSACTION 'COR3' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
ELSE.
MESSAGE w208(00) WITH 'Select by Order only!'.
ENDIF.
ENDCASE.
ENDFORM. -
Problems with Receiver Determination
Hi everybody.
I have started as XI developer 2 weeks ago.
I'm trying to replicate de tbit40 exercises in our company system. when i try to make the 'Receiver Determination' somethings happen. It doesn't appear the part to write the system receiver.
This is my scenario : file->XI->IDOC.
I've defined in the SLD the hardware, including one PC, the XI server and the SAP 4.6c server.
This is only a test in order to check the connectivity between the PC and SAP R3. I haven't configured yet the part of the IDOC in the R3 system. Is this necesary to view the 'subwindow' of system receiver?
Thanks.Hi everybody,
I'm having some problems with the sender agreement and the receiver determination, let me explain you the scenario: i'm trying to translate inbound plain text files to XML to a outbound interface for MDM.
An XI consultant (expertise) has successfully created the inbound - outbound interface mappings for vendors catalog, it has worked good since he set it up, but now that i'm trying to create the materials mapping according to the manuals step by step, and when i try to create the receiver determination settings, i can't find my interface mappings, the pop-up window return 0 objects for interface mappings (that i have already created and linked with msg types).
So what can i do? Do you have any idea?
Regards.
Gerardo. -
MS SQL Server problem with MDB's: javax.transaction.xa.XAException
I am programming agents in j2ee and using MDB to implement the asynchronicity of
the agents.
Those MDB's get messages (MapMessage) from a controller (an SFSB) that contain
the agent's ID and the action that the agent has to perform. The MDB creates a
SFSB, and calls the appropriate action from this session bean. Those actions require
to read and write from my MS SQL Server 2000 XA database. But when running my
program, I often get this error, which doesn't seem to affect the action, because
when I check my database data, everything is updated correctly. So the program
still completes, but the errors slow down the execution (the program hangs for
about 3 seconds, each time the error occurs).
Does anybody has an explanation or solution for this?
Thank you...
This is the error output:
onMessage()
Reading MapMessage: 1
<26-apr-2004 14.34 u. CEST> <Error> <EJB> <BEA-010026> <Exception occurred during
commit of transaction Xid=BEA1-005F88135FFBA636FFF7(15619088),Status=Rolled back.
[Reason=javax.transaction.xa.XAException: [BEA][SQLServer JDBC Driver][SQLServer]xa_prepare
(0) returns -4],numRepliesOwedMe=0,numRepliesOwedOthers=0,seconds since begin=4,seconds
left=30,XAServerResourceInfo[JMS_JMS Server2_NotDurable]=(ServerResourceInfo[JMS_JMS
Server2_NotDurable]=(state=rolledback,assigned=lucille3_ms),xar=JMS_JMS Server2_NotDurable),XAServerResourceInfo[MSSQL
Connection Pool]=(ServerResourceInfo[MSSQL Connection Pool]=(state=rolledback,assigned=lucille3_ms),xar=MSSQL
Connection Pool),SCInfo[cluster+lucille3_ms]=(state=rolledback),local properties=({}),OwnerTransactionManager=ServerTM[ServerCoordinatorDescriptor=(CoordinatorURL=lucille3_ms+127.0.0.1:8001+cluster+t3+,
XAResources={},NonXAResources={})],CoordinatorURL=lucille3_ms+127.0.0.1:8001+cluster+t3+):
javax.transaction.xa.XAException: [BEA][SQLServer JDBC Driver][SQLServer]xa_prepare
(0)returns -4
at weblogic.jdbcx.sqlserver.SQLServerImplXAResource.executeXaRpc(Unknown
Source)
at weblogic.jdbcx.sqlserver.SQLServerImplXAResource.prepare(Unknown Source)
at weblogic.jdbcx.base.BaseXAResource.prepare(Unknown Source)
at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.prepare(DataSource.java:821)
at weblogic.transaction.internal.XAServerResourceInfo.prepare(XAServerResourceInfo.java:1161)
at weblogic.transaction.internal.XAServerResourceInfo.prepare(XAServerResourceInfo.java:395)
at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerSCInfo$1.execute(ServerSCInfo.java:253)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:197)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:170)
--------------- nested within: ------------------
weblogic.transaction.RollbackException: Could not prepare resource 'MSSQL Connection
Pool
[BEA][SQLServer JDBC Driver][SQLServer]xa_prepare (0) returns -4 - with nested
exception:
[javax.transaction.xa.XAException: [BEA][SQLServer JDBC Driver][SQLServer]xa_prepare
(0) returns -4]
at weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionImpl.throwRollbackException(TransactionImpl.java:1644)
at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.internalCommit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:300)
at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.commit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:221)
at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:412)
at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:316)
at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MDListener.onMessage(MDListener.java:281)
at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.onMessage(JMSSession.java:2596)
at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.execute(JMSSession.java:2516)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:197)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:170).>
I am programming agents in j2ee and using MDB to implement the asynchronicity of
the agents.
Those MDB's get messages (MapMessage) from a controller (an SFSB) that contain
the agent's ID and the action that the agent has to perform. The MDB creates a
SFSB, and calls the appropriate action from this session bean. Those actions require
to read and write from my MS SQL Server 2000 XA database. But when running my
program, I often get this error, which doesn't seem to affect the action, because
when I check my database data, everything is updated correctly. So the program
still completes, but the errors slow down the execution (the program hangs for
about 3 seconds, each time the error occurs).
Does anybody has an explanation or solution for this?
Thank you...
This is the error output:
onMessage()
Reading MapMessage: 1
<26-apr-2004 14.34 u. CEST> <Error> <EJB> <BEA-010026> <Exception occurred during
commit of transaction Xid=BEA1-005F88135FFBA636FFF7(15619088),Status=Rolled back.
[Reason=javax.transaction.xa.XAException: [BEA][SQLServer JDBC Driver][SQLServer]xa_prepare
(0) returns -4],numRepliesOwedMe=0,numRepliesOwedOthers=0,seconds since begin=4,seconds
left=30,XAServerResourceInfo[JMS_JMS Server2_NotDurable]=(ServerResourceInfo[JMS_JMS
Server2_NotDurable]=(state=rolledback,assigned=lucille3_ms),xar=JMS_JMS Server2_NotDurable),XAServerResourceInfo[MSSQL
Connection Pool]=(ServerResourceInfo[MSSQL Connection Pool]=(state=rolledback,assigned=lucille3_ms),xar=MSSQL
Connection Pool),SCInfo[cluster+lucille3_ms]=(state=rolledback),local properties=({}),OwnerTransactionManager=ServerTM[ServerCoordinatorDescriptor=(CoordinatorURL=lucille3_ms+127.0.0.1:8001+cluster+t3+,
XAResources={},NonXAResources={})],CoordinatorURL=lucille3_ms+127.0.0.1:8001+cluster+t3+):
javax.transaction.xa.XAException: [BEA][SQLServer JDBC Driver][SQLServer]xa_prepare
(0)returns -4
at weblogic.jdbcx.sqlserver.SQLServerImplXAResource.executeXaRpc(Unknown
Source)
at weblogic.jdbcx.sqlserver.SQLServerImplXAResource.prepare(Unknown Source)
at weblogic.jdbcx.base.BaseXAResource.prepare(Unknown Source)
at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.prepare(DataSource.java:821)
at weblogic.transaction.internal.XAServerResourceInfo.prepare(XAServerResourceInfo.java:1161)
at weblogic.transaction.internal.XAServerResourceInfo.prepare(XAServerResourceInfo.java:395)
at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerSCInfo$1.execute(ServerSCInfo.java:253)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:197)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:170)
--------------- nested within: ------------------
weblogic.transaction.RollbackException: Could not prepare resource 'MSSQL Connection
Pool
[BEA][SQLServer JDBC Driver][SQLServer]xa_prepare (0) returns -4 - with nested
exception:
[javax.transaction.xa.XAException: [BEA][SQLServer JDBC Driver][SQLServer]xa_prepare
(0) returns -4]
at weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionImpl.throwRollbackException(TransactionImpl.java:1644)
at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.internalCommit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:300)
at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.commit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:221)
at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:412)
at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:316)
at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MDListener.onMessage(MDListener.java:281)
at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.onMessage(JMSSession.java:2596)
at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.execute(JMSSession.java:2516)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:197)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:170).>
-
Problem with submit report for transaction LT23
Hi,
I want to submit report for transaction LT23 based on the double click on a field in the output of my report. I am using selection table to pass values. The problem is I have something called dynamic selections. I am using some selection fields from the dynamic selection option. Can anyone tell me how do I pass the values in such a case?In your [submit|http://help.sap.com/abapdocu/en/ABAPSUBMIT.htm] statement in the [selection screen parameters|http://help.sap.com/abapdocu/en/ABAPSUBMIT_SELSCREEN_PARAMETERS.htm] use the [WITH FREE SELECTIONS|http://help.sap.com/abapdocu/en/ABAPSUBMIT_SELSCREEN_PARAMETERS.htm#!ABAP_ADDITION_5@5@] option to pass dynamic selections
NB: Use FREE_SELECTIONS_RANGE_2_EX to build the correct parameter texpr.
Regards
Raymond -
Problems with accounting on MIGO transaction
Hello All!!
A problem that happens on QAS system and not happens on PRD system.
When I create a Goods Receipt (MIGO transaction) with apportionment of Cost Center (Good Receipt with more of one Cost Center), the system isn't accounting (Controlling and Financial Accounting) the posting.
Does Anybody know the solution to this problem?
Thanks!!
Regards,
Vitor Chagas
SAP Consultant Material ManagmentI am very certain that this is not limited to your QAS . It is SAP standard that in case of multiple account assignment the costs will be posted with the invoice, not with the receipt as it is usual for single account assignment.
You PO has a flag for GR non-valuated at item detail in tab delivery. and the F1 field help tells you: This indicator must be set in the case of multiple account assignment for example. -
Problems with account determination analysis/revenue accounts
Dear forum,
I am creating a billing document from a service contract.
When I create my billing document I receive an error message saying "Account determination error".
I am checking my account determination analysis for revenue accounts in the billing document (Environment->Acct.Determination analysis->Revenue accounts).
For standard condition type DIFF I receive a message 120 saying "G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFK" which is fine.
But I dont get any message 215 (which should be returned under the row of message 120), and it should say "G/L account in document: 0000578109".
Does anyone know why I dont receive the message 215 and why we receive an error message saying "Account determination error", even though we have succesful hit in the access sequence (access no 40 Sales org/Account key)?
This is how to access sequence log looks like in revenue accounts:
10 123 Access KOFK not carried out (initialized field)
20 121 No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFK
30 123 Access KOFK not carried out (initialized field)
40 120 G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFK
For access 20 (Sales org/Account assignment group/Account key) , we have specified an account assignment group on the Sold-to but not set up any account assignment for this combination. Is that what is wrong? The system expects an account for access 20 since it found the combination of Sales org/Account assignment group?
Thanks!
Edited by: Ola Törnblom on Dec 22, 2008 3:17 PMHi,
VKOA - check. Both KOFK and KOFI using same conditions with same G/L account.
FS00 - check. Account exist in company code.
This is the log in accounts revenue when everything is OK (EXAMPLE 1):
Condition Message Description
DIFF 120 G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFI
DIFF 215 G/L account in document: 0000578109
Access Message Description
10 123 Access KOFI not carried out (initialized field)
20 123 Access KOFI not carried out (initialized field)
30 123 Access KOFI not carried out (initialized field)
40 120 G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFI
And this is the log now, when we have the error of acct determination (EXAMPLE 2):
Condition Message Description
DIFF 120 G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFK
Access Message Description
10 123 Access KOFK not carried out (initialized field)
20 121 No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFK
30 123 Access KOFK not carried out (initialized field)
40 120 G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFK
For the customer we have assigned an account assignement group and it finds the account key via condition type DIFF and guess that is why we get a hit on access 20 in the example above (Message 121). But there is no G/L account entered for the combination of sales org./account assignment group/account key.
Instead, we have chosen to have the G/L account determination based on sales org/account key only, as in access 40. And it finds the G/L account 0000578109 for access 40.
But what I dont understand is why we dont get any message 215 as in EXAMPLE 1.
And we get the error message "Account determination error" in EXAMPLE 2.
Thanks,
Ola
Edited by: Ola Törnblom on Dec 22, 2008 4:58 PM -
VAT Reconciliation Problem with large number of transactions
Hi
We are experiencing problem when it comes to doing a Manual Internal Reconciliation for the VAT G/L account.
We have about 10,000 Output VAT transactions per month. So when we do a manual reconciliation for all these 10,000 credit entries against one debit entry SAP B1 resulted in "Out of Memory Error" or "Internal Error".
We are currently on SAP B1 2007A PL49.
The client system spec is Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 2.0GHZ with 2GB memory.
Has any one come across the same issue before? Or SAP B1 cannot handle 10,000 transactions reconciliation due to limit in application?
BR,
JimmyFor this kind of volume, you may have to do reconciliation more often to avoid error messages. I don't think this is application error but the limitation of all resources.
Thanks,
Gordon -
Problem with REVERSAL using the Transaction - FB08
I have posted a document with document type ZA and when iam trying to reverse this document using FB08 it is giving the below error.
ERROR: Enter Line item number.
Please note that I have posted the ZA document directly in FI using the Transaction - F-02.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Regards
Praveen.PHi Praveen,
For that issue go to OBA7 and check the document type ZA,In details Select check box for reversal and give the document type AB for reversal.check the document fb03.
May be this information is useful to you
If you have any doubt feel free to ask
Regards
Ritesh
Maybe you are looking for
-
I'm an Apple newbie. I'd like to be able to list each file in the "Desktop" tree (ie; on the desktop, or in any folder on the desktop, etc.), along with its path, that has been modified since a certain date. When I use Finder to do a similar search,
-
Hi Gurus I am testing AS2 connection with a partner using Seeburger adaptor. The partner is sending us edi files using AS2 HTTP protocol. In Seeburger workbench, I can see error that 'com.seeburger.ediint.edi.EDIMessageException: CANNOT DECRYPT MESSA
-
Why won't this MERGE statement work?
I am testing out a MERGE statement, which contains a subquery that will return no rows...on this condition, it should insert a record; however I get 0 records merged. Why is this? Ultimately, the hard-coded values will actually be passed in as parame
-
Urgent urgent...plzz
hi, hi gurus, what is difference between service tax with credit and without credit.............. i want a create a tax code for service tax without credit... if i use this tax code what would be effects, will the tax be added to the base amount...
-
Hello experts, Our company uses Oracle 10g DB and we are using Stored Procedures to fetch employees data from various tables. We fetch only fresh data depending on the date when it is retrived. Hence the result of the query depends on Sysdate value.