Payment file manual change

Dear Guys and Gals!
I face rather hard issue with SAP right know.
The problem is as following: currently automatic payment run is set up, but the payment file that is generated and then submitted to the bank needs some corrections. I'm particulary speaking about special symbols like &,é,ü,ö,(,)... that can be part of vendor name. It is impossible to change these symbols in vendor master data, but only in payment file, as bank says that it can not accept these symbols in the file. Maybe there should be some kind of middleware that will be changing payment file. What middleware then?!
Please advice how can it be done?! I browsed through tons of materials but there is no answer.
Thank you so much for the help,

Hi,
Welcome you post on the forum.
What you can do is to find out what bank accept and replace all those special character to the letter bank accepted.
Thanks,
Gordon

Similar Messages

Batch file rename. I have multiple files I want to rename, that have a date in their name in the mm/dd/yy format. The slashes seem to freak out the batch rename function. Any workarounds that would help me avoid manually changing each name?

OS X Yosemite 10.10.2, Macbook Air,
Finder batch file rename function. I have multiple files I want to rename, that have a date in their name in the mm/dd/yy format. The slashes seem to freak out the batch rename function and it won't work. I took out the slashes and worked fine. Any workarounds that would help me avoid manually changing each name? I should point out that I want to leave most of the name intact just change the first word in each name. Also the files I'm working with are in PDF format.

That's a comment in the file. It has no effect at all.

Change batch header of out bound ACH payment file??

Hi all,
Currently in the batch header of settlement file for all processed ACH transactions, we are using PPD(Prearranged Payment and Deposit Entry) as standard entry class code for all type of CA's(residential and business)
we need to change in the batch header of the out bound ACH payment file as....PPD for residential customer and CCD(Cash Concentration & Disbursement) for commercial customer...
The batch is consisting of the programs SAPFKPY3 and RFKPYL00_MASS.
please suggest how can we change the batch header of the out boun file.
Any help appreciate..

Srinivas-
That field in company batch header with record type is called "effective entry date". Please look at the attached thread.
Effective Entry Date
Shail

F110 Configaration - Manually change the payment method.

Hi Experts ,
Below is my requirement
In Txn FBZP.
1. Use 'Payment method in country' to create a new payment method 'P' as copy of
    payment method 'C'.
2. Use 'Payment method in company code' to add method 'P' to 3010 ( Company
     code). The only difference between 'C' and 'P' should be the SAPScript check
     form.
3. Create a proposal with payment method 'C'. in Txn F110, Manually change the
    payment method to 'P'.
Here my question is how to change the payment method from "C" to "P" manually.
Thnx & Regds ,
Rajasekhar.P

Hi
Run the Proposal...after that go to the Edit proposal and using the reallocate button and change payment method manually..
VVR

Change to the existing outgoing positive payment file (EID 820)

Hello Experts,
I have to make a change to the existing outgoing positive payment file (EID 820).
The current scenario is:
We are running the payment run in SAP and generating IDocs using program RFFOEDI1 mentioned in printout data medium. The IDocs generated are of Basic Type PEXR2002. These IDocs then processed by SAP PI and converted to EDI and the EDI is sent to the Bank. Currently in this process, we are not assigning the check numbers at the time of payment run. Also the check numbers are not there in the IDocs. The Bank prints the checks and sends us the check number which we update in SAP using Z program.
Now there is a change in the requirement and we need to assign the check numbers at the time of payment run and also transmit them with the EDI file to the Bank. Bank will print the checks and send it to the vendors.
Now as per my understanding, the check number will not be assigned until I use the program RFFOUS_C in printout data medium.
Please suggest the possible options to generate IDocs which has the check number in it.
Thanks in advance
Sanjay Sarode

You can use RFFOEDO_1 can still generate check 3's, just maintain check number in the check lots configuration and ensure you assign the lots to the correct payment method.
Thanks
Shine

Accounting Clerk in Payment File (DTAUZV)

Hello,
we have a requirement which is to include the accounting clerk in the payment file sent to the bank.
The accounting clerk in our case will be the same for all payments coming from the company code. I understand that there is a field in the vendor master, and that each vendor can be assigned to an accounting clerk. This would be one way
However, is it possible to assign a single accountign clerk to the payment method, bank or company code? updating all the vendors will take too much time. If we only update one accounting clerk per company code in OB05, will it take this value as default? (currently we have several, obsolete entried in OB05)
Thanks and regards
Daniel

You cannot assign accounting clerk to payment method, bank or company code.
Easily you can do the mass change of vendors if it is single accounting clerk data. I believe you have already created accounting clerk, otherwise define OB05.
Mass change vendors by using XK99. This is really easy.
Regards,
Ravi

Federal court website gives a .pl document which opens as garbage until we manually change it to .pdf, is there any way to get Firefox to do this automatically?

I am using a Mac. When downloading a document from the federal court website using Firefox, we get a .pl document which opens as garbage (in TextEdit) until we manually change it to .pdf, which causes it to open just fine (in Preview). It used to work fine, giving a .pdf document every time, but apparently upgrades to Firefox have removed this functionality. As far as I can tell my computer, an iMac running Mac system OS X 10.10.1, does not recognize the .pl format. Is there any way to get Firefox to automatically convert a downloaded file from .pl format to .pdf format? My friend tells me that Google Chrome downloads these documents with no problem. I would prefer to stick with Firefox but I might have to change if every downloaded document is in an unreadable format.
This is a typical example of what I get when I try to open a .pl document (the pdf version is a one page document using plain English):
=====
%PDF-1.5
%‚„œ”
2 0 obj
<</Length1 15628/Length 10121/Filter/FlateDecode>>stream
xúÌ{i`U∂9∑™∫;kWoYÈtuöK“ÑR@“ F!,Å$ñêÑÑd Çä††¢≤)
¢Ääƒet\FeûNà£Œ∆y3"ÈÔ‹Í|Ûæ˜˝˙˛LUNü{œ›Œ=€=∑i

HI jlawrence1,
Is it possible to associated the pl file mimetype with an application? [[Applications panel - Set how Firefox handles different types of files]]

Is there a way to set read-only on a file manually?

Is there a secret keypress combo that will allow me to set
the read-only attribute on files in the file inspector window? I
can not use the check-in/out function because, IMHO, it is broken.
Macromedia has given a menu ability to "reset" (turn off) the
read-only attribute but they left out the "turn on" function. Would
certainly help me a lot...anyone?
Thanks!
p.s. in order to defray wasted back-n-forth postings, here is
why it is broken:
1. I run DW8 locally while connected to the network with
mapped fileserver drives (M:, P:, etc)
2. I have the default website set up pointing to our
DEVELOPMENT file server
3. when I do a PUT the files are FTP'd to a different web
server for public consumption
4. the error is that if check-in/out is enabled, the files
are pulled from the PUBLIC web server instead of just opening them
from the DEVELOPMENT server like I clicked on...if I wanted to edit
the live files I would have changed my site pointer to remote
instead of local (good grief)
5. this is bad because everyone else in the company uses that
cr@ppy Frontpage and are constantly editing their division's
webpages, which are in various stages of readiness. When I edit one
of those pages I need to be editing the one they have been working
on, NOT the one that is currently published to the public website!
DW8 is doing more work than I want it to do by going out and
grabbing the published page instead of simply opening the one I
clicked on in the file manager window. That makes NO sense at all,
and as a developer I certainly wouldn't have programmed it that
way...

quote:
Originally posted by:
Michael Hager
The problem with any boxed software is that the developers
can NEVER know how every possible customer will use the software.
That's why, as a developer, they need to make
the software have MANY more checkboxes in the options screen to
allow the user to use the software the way they need to, not the
way the developers THINK they will need to. Just look at Microsoft
as a poor example of this--I am never so frustrated as when trying
to use ANY of their Office products, which make easy tasks
difficult and do not include some of the most common options that
competing products have.
quote:
The Dreamweaver check out system actually works very well if
it’s set up properly and administered strictly. If you set it
up on your testing server with everyone set up on their work
stations correctly it will tell you who has a file locked for
editing. Once everyone is working as a team with good supervision
and division of tasks under a strict policy set by management,
Dreamweaver will work very well for your purposes. You
shouldn’t have to lock and unlock files manually since the
check in-check out function will do it for you nicely. When you are
satisfied that all is well with the site or particular pages, then
someone in a managing position can release or authorize release to
the live site.
The problem is that I am the only person using
DW in the organization, everyone else is using Frontpage...blah...
You and Murray have both alluded to a separate "testing"
server. Perhaps I can make this system work by setting up the
testing server as a duplicate of the development server in my site
manager. Then I would have to manually publish the files from the
testing server to the live production server myself. What a pain!!!
I can not believe that I am the only person in the world that has a
setup like this -- it seems very common to me. I would assume most
government organizations are set up identically as us.
<sigh>

HELP PLEASE! Export Aperture 1 Library and Import to Aperture 3? Or another way to transfer files WITH changes into new MacBook Pro?

Hi everyone,
I recently purchased a new MacBook pro with Retina display, to better manage Aperture and Photoshop. I took the advice of the genius (and after spending all night messing with permissions, etc.), opted out of using Setup Assistant or Migration Assistant and decided to transfer my files manually (as the two systems weren't merging properly the first time -- it was a giant mess). Long story short, I tried to transfer everything from my previous MacBook (operating on 10.5.8 with Aperture 1), and Aperture 3 couldn't handle it. It was crashing, and crashing so badly that NO button could be activated in the program (I FINALLY got Aperture working by disabling previews, and by moving from a managed library to a referenced library).
I initially dragged and dropped all photos from my previous MacBook to my external, and imported. I obviously lost folders, edit history and any other information that I needed to know what edits had been done on the file. Additionally, any movie that had been imported into Aperture was corrupt (the file was not transferring over correctly). I searched and searched for different methods, and finally found that I could export each project from my original MacBook as a "Library" and consolidate masters, or not, etc. I took the time and did this for each project. When I went to import these into Aperture 3, it said I was not able to because the libraries were from a previous version of Aperture.
Is there any way to bypass this? Or another way to transfer my projects? I understand I won't be able to do this for my entire library... but I'm wondering if there's any way to transfer my changes made, projects and details from Aperture 1 to Aperture 3? (and for those who might pose upgrading my original MacBook as an option, I cannot. It's too old. I think the best I could uprade to is Aperture 2, IF i can update the OS. Though, I definitely don't think I should be forced to do that since I've aleady re-invested in a new computer, AND had to re-buy Aperture for the new one.
Any/all advice is VERY much appreciated, as I really want to move forward and FINALLY start appreciating this program and computer (i.e. my investment) and move forward business wise. Thank you!

Hi Jack,
Thanks for responding (as it seems as though no one else has been able to provide any insight as of yet)! Not sure if you saw my recent post, but the version of Aperture on the 2008 MacBook has been upgraded to 3.1.2 (not sure how; I bought it in 2009, but only have OS X 10.5.8... which apparently can't house 3.1.2 of Aperture, but hey, like many other anomalies i'm encountering, I'm no longer surprised!). I am unable to upgrade it any further, as it warns me that my OS X does not fit the requirements. I exported the projects as libraries; however, like I posted before, apparently these are from too old of a version for the new Aperture (3.3.1) to handle and import.
It's getting to the point where I'd almost pay to upgrade the OS X on my previous MacBook (10.5.8) to something newer in order to THEN update Aperture to a newer version; however, my previous MacBook simply cannot handle this (the specs are awful -- hence my decision to save up and upgrade to the newest MBP with Retina).
I've spent hours upon hours transferring files, libraries as projects, previews, versions, even masters (though, apparently some of them aren't accessible?) with no luck. I've rebuilt the library and reprocessed everything. And this is all after having to return one MBP already since Aperture 3.3.1 is glitch-y as it is, and froze everything for having a "managed library". So, now that I know that I have to deal with a referenced library in Aperture... I just need to actually transfer my previous library to my new one (hopefully WITH adjustments since these are years worth of photos and work).
Again, any help is appreciated. I've lost enough sleep, time, and vision health over this at this point.
Also, I know Migration Assistant is an option, I was told that it wouldn't work properly anyway because of the different operating systems, and the potential for problems.

Issue in Turkey DME payment file

Hello Gurus,
We have an issue in F110 payment file. We have configured DMEE for "GARANTI BANK" for Turkey country. we have encountered an issue while creating payment file in F110. System is not considering into the payment file if a vendor is having multiple bank accounts in the vendor master and invoices are posted with different partner bank type. We are not facing any issue for mutiple invoices paid for same vendor with same vendor bank account. The below example will give clear picture.
1) Vendor-1075847 having two different bank accounts in vendor master with partner bank type-0001 & 0002
2) Total three invoices are due for payment out of these, two invoices are posted with bank type-0002 and remaining invoice is with bank type-0001
3) When I run F110 for all three invoices, invoices gets cleared but in payment file to be sent to bank showing only one invoice amount which was posted with bank type-0001.
4) I believe that I need to do some changes in DMEE tree configuration to get all invoices information in the payment file but no idea that in which segment & tag to be done.
It woudl be great if any one shares their ideas/experiences in this regard.
Thanks in advance

Hello Friends,
We have come to the conculsion that whenever line items are splitting in F110 as shown in the attached screen shot, system not picking up the entire amount into the payment file which was cleared in the payment run. This issue is encountering only when payments are dividing into line items for that particular vendor.
For above example: first line item having two invoices to be cleared consiting of amounts 258,00 & 129,00(partner bank type-0001) and second line item having only one invoice(amount-119,00) related to same vendor(with partner bank type-0002). Because of this split at F110 level..., payment file which is sending to bank getting only first line item invoices amount-387,00(258,00+129,00) instead of whole amount-506,00.
This issue might be resolved by combining these two line items into one line item or by making changes in the payment medium workbench format(DMEE tree). I have considered & tried all possible field in FBZP & vendor master and unluckly nothing workedout.
Please share you inputs. It deliberately need at this point of time.
Thanks in advance

No remittance advice output in the 'Outbound Payment File Directory'

We are working on an upgrade from 11i to R12.
Configuration has created a profile for an electronic payment with a separate remittance advice. They have specified an outbound payment file directory. The EFT text file is generated in the proper directory (on the appserver); however, the remittance advice file went to the default directory on the dbase server. We want to pick up the file, rename and ftp to our printer from the 'outbound payment file directory'.
Is this expected functionality or did we miss something in configuration?

Manu,
I do not think it is possible -- You may log a SR and confirm this with Oracle support.
Where Can Be Found The Output File For The Transfer To The Bank [ID 730548.1]
How To Change Nacha Payament Output Directory And Name [ID 786007.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Payment file duplication in target system at F110 transaction

Hi All
Payment file duplication in target system. Wherein since the Print Job was scheduled twice by user, the duplication of payment had taken place.The payment medium program u201CRFFOAVIS_FPAYMu201D is use to control the generation of duplicate payment file at automatic payment run program(F110).User needs an warning message if print job is schedule twice on same date and same identification number.Has Any one implemented such a scenario.
Thanks!

Hi
System usually gives warning message F0417 aaginst the duplicatate print schedule , no need to do anything to get this message..
Please check print log in additional filed tab in F110 , you will find this warning message in the log.
Further you can chcek this warning message property if you can change this from warning to warning plus email or any other option, which will prevent /alert duplicate file processeing.
Cheers
Mukta

Payment Files - Irish Stdrd 18 for HSBC - 'Hub' account

Hello,
I'm working on config to enable us to send payment files to HSBC Net in the Irish standard 18 format.
HSBC have a requirement to transmit to them only a 6 digit account number; referred to as their HUB account number.
I have created a house bank & am able to generate the files ok, but this 6 digit account number is giving me problems.
Although I only enter a 6 digit account number on the house bank, the output file adds in two additional leading or trailing '0'.
I thinking that I will probably have to make a change to the program that creates the file, but was wondering if it is possible to acheive by the way the account number is formatted alone.
Has anyone come across this 'HUB' account number for HSBC Net themselves & if so can you offer any advise as to how you got the file to output in their required format?
Thanks
Steve

Louise,
For HSBC Net we are using two payment formats. MT103 & Irish Standard 18.
For both types I had to use T-CODE DMEE to create the two formats.
These are then linked to payment methods & are then used when generating a payment through F110. There are a number of things to setup to make these work & it took me a lot of playing around, testing & then fixing & trying again to get it right. there's not a lot of help out there for DMEE, I found looking at some existing formats helped, so you can see how they were built.
Steve

F110 DME payment file: add a number of lead days to posting and value date

Hello,
For an Italian company, the DME payment file (F110) needs to be checked and approved by an accountant after it is created. This takes 3 to 4 days after which the file is sent to the bank. The bank will reject the file if the value date is three days late (date which the bank uses to process the file on). For fiscal reasons the accounting clerks need the have the same posting date as the value date
I managed to set the value date in the DME files a couple of days later. The setting I used (FBZP -> bank determination -> value date) adds the number of lead days to the value date on the basis of the posting date as defined by the user in F110. For some reason I cannot set it to 0 days, it always adds up 1 day. Is that a normal effect or have I changed the settings in the wrong way?
I found another setting in customising ("define value date rules") which seems to have the same functionality. In the help function it is said that the setting does not influence the payment program and that the program manages the value date. Is there another setting? Can this problem be solved without the help of a programmer?
Thank you very much!
René
functional consultant
Edited by: ConsultantSAINT-OBAIN on Apr 8, 2010 10:24 AM

Here's a section of code that does exactly that:
CALL FUNCTION 'DATE_CONVERT_TO_FACTORYDATE'
EXPORTING
    CORRECT_OPTION                     = '+'
    DATE                               = G_WORKAREA3-CREATEDON
    FACTORY_CALENDAR_ID                = L_S_PLANT-FACTCAL_ID
IMPORTING
*   DATE                               =
   FACTORYDATE                        = L_FCDATE
EXCEPTIONS
    CALENDAR_BUFFER_NOT_LOADABLE       = 1
    CORRECT_OPTION_INVALID             = 2
    DATE_AFTER_RANGE                   = 3
    DATE_BEFORE_RANGE                  = 4
    DATE_INVALID                       = 5
    FACTORY_CALENDAR_NOT_FOUND         = 6
    OTHERS                             = 7.
L_FCDATE = L_FCDATE + L_S_ZLEAD-/BIC/ZLEAD.
CALL FUNCTION 'FACTORYDATE_CONVERT_TO_DATE'
    EXPORTING
      FACTORYDATE                  = L_FCDATE
      FACTORY_CALENDAR_ID          = L_S_PLANT-FACTCAL_ID
    IMPORTING
      DATE                         = L_DATE
    EXCEPTIONS
      CALENDAR_BUFFER_NOT_LOADABLE = 1
      FACTORYDATE_AFTER_RANGE      = 2
      FACTORYDATE_BEFORE_RANGE     = 3
      FACTORYDATE_INVALID          = 4
      FACTORY_CALENDAR_ID_MISSING = 5
      FACTORY_CALENDAR_NOT_FOUND   = 6
      OTHERS                       = 7.
* result value of the routine
RESULT = L_DATE.

Manually changing a document version number when importing an existing document

Hello.
Like a lot of people, we are starting to make use of Sharepoint Online as part of an Office 365 subscription.
One of the things we want to do is move a bunch of version controlled documents from their current location on a traditional network file share into a Sharepoint Document library, and then use approval and version history to control and track changes.
At the moment these are stored with the version number as part of the file name, so we have something like "Company car policy - version 6.docx". When there's a new version, the old one is moved to an archive folder and a new copy is saved as "Version
7.docx" which is outdated and far from ideal.
I've created my library, tested that approvals work, and have found instructions on how to use a workflow to notify people that changes have been made. That's all fine, but if I upload an existing document into the library it will start the version number
at 0.1 or 1.0 depending on whether I add it as a draft or final.
What I need to be able to do is to manually change the version number to match our existing system without having someone sit there checking a document in and out. Some of them have version numbers in the 20s so this would be a huge waste of time.
I can't believe I'm the first person to have this problem - can anyone help me please?

You are not the only one, that is for sure!
The only way (that I'm aware of and is easy to accomplish) to achieve this is the following:
* Upload your history v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6. And then it is really in sync with your current / old version numbers.
* just upload the new / latest file and check out/check in the file x times so the version number will increase every check in.
I know that this sounds weird/funny time consuming. Without 3th party tooling I don't see any other solution.
With 3th party tooling then you can perform those actions (basicaly the same actions) more quick and easy, however you need to get yourself comfortable which such tooling. One of the tools (no I'm not a sales agent or whatsover) that I know can perform metadata
changes is ShareGate. However in PowerShell you can perform also a lot of magic and without ad doubt there are a lot of migrating tools (AvePoint, Tzunami, etc) that can also "mimick" those manual steps.
My best suggestion is:
* If you need to keep the old versions upload them all one by one (if it is not too time consuming)
Otherwise
* create a archive for old versions and start in SharePoint with version 1 which is exactly the same as the latest non-SharePoint version and store that archive in a separate document library/folder/site. (only keep old versions if there is a reall need
/business case or legal case to do that.)
Kind regards,
Michiel hamers
If you think this answer is good: please choose mark as answer.
Michiel Hamers www.SharePointman.nl Don't hesitate to contact me for a SharePoint/O365 question.

Payment file manual change

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for