PC Netlink 2 compatibilty with WinXp 64 Bit

We are trying to add a Windows XP 64-bit client to our PC Netlink 2 domain. We can join windows 2000 and windows xp clients to our domain but we are having no luck with 64 bit edition.
We can see our domain and navigate to it through windows explorer but when we try and add the client to our domain we receive a RPC error.
Any help/advice on this would be greatly appreciated.
Message was edited by:
dgfuchs

The first time you re-installed Win 32 on the raid that was a bit drastic. A repair ought to have done the job.
The problem was probably that you disconnected the array but that's where the boot.ini was and that file needed to be modified to add the path to the Win64 install.
Since you took out the array the Win64 install created a new boot.ini on the PATA drive. Even when you tell BIOS to boot off the array, Windows has a bad habit of looking at the IDE channels & using the boot.ini if it finds one there - but the file it found didn't point to the array of course.
So basically if you already have Win32 on the array I would leave that array connected normally when installing Win64 on the PATA drive and all should be well.
I've installed Win64 on the same array as my Win32 install and they co-exist happily. I reckon that's the most efficient way to do it. The main thing is to make separate partitions for Win32, Win64 and data files when you install Win32 in the first place. The two OSs can share the same data files, incuding stuff like email.

Similar Messages

  • Presario v3702TU trying to setup it up with winxp 64 bit, but unable to get audio to work

    Hi,
    I just installed a old laptop of mine with win xp 64 bit + sp2.
    I am able to get most of the drivers for xp 64 bit, but audio is troubling me.
    I am unable to get exact driver for the below Device ID
    HDAUDIO\FUNC_01&VEN_14F1&DEV_5051&SUBSYS_103C30CD&REV_1000
    which should be connexant smart audio 221.
    I ahve installed the UAA driver, but not able to get exact dirver for xp 64 bit. All the drivers availble on net seem to be off vista/xp -32 bit.
    Please help

    It is really hard to find 64bit driver
    There is one has similar issue.
    http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Desktop-PC-Sound-and-Audio-Reply/Vista-to-XP-downgrade-No-Sound/td-p/26... 
    You can get the driver from the page 2, or get it the skydrive link below:
    http://cid-3f10d7c1771f7efe.office.live.com/self.aspx/Public/Conexant%20SmartAudio%5E_221%5E_XP.zip
    Please note, MS UAA driver must be installed before audio driver.  Try to use the MS UAA driver from the page 1.  If has problem then use the link below:
    http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/softwareDownloadIndex?cc=us&lc=en&dlc=en&tmp_geoLoc=true&software...
    Sorry, i don't have unit to do the test for you. Please let me know what the resoult is.
    Cheers
    Although I am an HP Employee, I am speaking for myself and not for HP.
    Make it easier for other people to find solutions, by marking my answer “Accept as Solution” if it solves your problem.

  • Directx on WinXP 64-bit?

    Hello I just built my AMD64 system but I can't seem to find a version of DirectX that is compatible with WinXP 64 bit. Could anyone point me or perhaps there is none? Thanks for your time.

    WinXP64bit already has directx with it ... it installs when you install the OS .. its the only version they currently have so you have to put up with it until they release a newer version
    hope that helps & happy computing

  • WinXP-64 bit corrupts existing RAID array

    I've got an MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum motherboard running Win XP Pro SP2 on two 36 gig SATA Raptors.  Everything was working fine, but I wanted to try the 64 bit version of XP.  Grabbed an old 80 gig PATA drive and threw that in the case.  Unplugged the SATA drives so as not to risk messing with the existing working OS.  Installed the latest 1218 x64 beta and it worked well.
      The problem was that when I shut down and reconnected my old RAID array, windows wouldn't boot from it.  I lost everything and had to rebuild Windows from scratch.  So now I know to never unplug the SATA drives   
      Rebuilt WinXP on the RAID array and then tried rebooting with the PATA drive with the 64 bit OS.  Came up with the "drive needs checking" screen, and proceeds to "fix" the RAID array while ignoring my frantic pounding on the Logitech USB keyboard to stop.  Rebooted and yes, the new install was nuked.  Okay, since it's gone anyway, reboot to the 64 bit OS and make sure it's got the 64 bit RAID drivers installed.
      Reinstall WinXP on the RAID array, reboot to the 64 bit OS on the other drive and the same old scandisk comes and nukes it AGAIN!
      So now the PATA drive is sitting on the shelf again, unless someone here can suggest what is causing this problem.
    System Specs
    Athlon64 3500
    gig of PQI 3200 at 2-2-2-5 2.6
    2x36 gig Raptors on ports 3-4
    Plextor PX-716a DVD+_RW
    Visiontek X800 Pro.

    The first time you re-installed Win 32 on the raid that was a bit drastic. A repair ought to have done the job.
    The problem was probably that you disconnected the array but that's where the boot.ini was and that file needed to be modified to add the path to the Win64 install.
    Since you took out the array the Win64 install created a new boot.ini on the PATA drive. Even when you tell BIOS to boot off the array, Windows has a bad habit of looking at the IDE channels & using the boot.ini if it finds one there - but the file it found didn't point to the array of course.
    So basically if you already have Win32 on the array I would leave that array connected normally when installing Win64 on the PATA drive and all should be well.
    I've installed Win64 on the same array as my Win32 install and they co-exist happily. I reckon that's the most efficient way to do it. The main thing is to make separate partitions for Win32, Win64 and data files when you install Win32 in the first place. The two OSs can share the same data files, incuding stuff like email.

  • Remote not working with WinXP 64

    I have a X-FI Platinum card with the front module and remote. Under WinXP Pro everything worked fine. I have since upgraded to WinXP 64 bit Pro and the remote does not work.
    I have installed the latest driver for WinXP 64 (At least last weeks driver) which went OK. Soundcard seems to work OK. I have a 5. speaker setup and I get sound from all speakers. Before there was the createi've audio console that was in the system tray, but that doesn't seem to be there with WinXP 64.
    Is there another download that I need to do for the Remote to function ? Also I no longer have any sound test options in the audio console is there another download for that as well ??System Specs:ASUS P5N32 SLI Deluxe MOBOIntel P4 660 processor2 GB RAMBFG 7800 GT video cardX-FI Platinum sound cardWinXP Pro 64 bit?Thanks,?wstreaker

    I am not sure whether the remote software gets installed with the 64 bit drivers or not. I know some people have turned to alternate software to control the remote on WinXP 64 bit edition successfully. I am sure you can find out what I mean by searching these forums, I am not allowed to say any more than that. Hope that helps?

  • Oracle 11g install for WinXP 64-bit - is 32-bit client needed?

    I just saw that the WinXP 64-bit version of 11g is now available.
    Does anyone know if it is necessary to install both the 64-bit Database and 32-bit Client on the same machine for a development server. This was the procedure for 10gR2 as the 64-bit ODBC drivers would not work with 32-bit ODBC apps.
    Thanks!

    I submitted a TAR/SR on MetaLink...
    Yes... you need both.

  • WinXP 64 Bit, Anyone tried yet????

    Hi Guys,
    Firstly, I fixed my problem I talked about in my last post.
    Turned out the VGA Card was bad, I say bad, what I mean is, when you look at the card from the side (?) The contacts were worn out and wouldnt make contact with the VGA slot thus preventing the MB from powering up :o|
    Beleive me, I was PISSED !!!!  
    Anyway, has anyone tried installing WinXP 65 bit extended version yet?
    Would be nice to get some feedback as I have a copy and would like to find out if it is worth the hassle??
    Not sure if there are enough drivers around.
    I know that a few things have been left out of the system by the people at Mikey Soft.
    What with the 32bit subsystem, have heard that 32 bit applications run slower than if i installed on regular XP ??
    oh well.  
    K8N Neo Platinum
    AMD 64 Bit 3200+ with Gigabyte Cooler Pro  
    1GB Kingston RAM
    160 GB Samsung SATA
    MSI WLAN Card
    Sound Blaster 5.1 Digital
    MSI FX5900XT VGA Card  

    The first time you re-installed Win 32 on the raid that was a bit drastic. A repair ought to have done the job.
    The problem was probably that you disconnected the array but that's where the boot.ini was and that file needed to be modified to add the path to the Win64 install.
    Since you took out the array the Win64 install created a new boot.ini on the PATA drive. Even when you tell BIOS to boot off the array, Windows has a bad habit of looking at the IDE channels & using the boot.ini if it finds one there - but the file it found didn't point to the array of course.
    So basically if you already have Win32 on the array I would leave that array connected normally when installing Win64 on the PATA drive and all should be well.
    I've installed Win64 on the same array as my Win32 install and they co-exist happily. I reckon that's the most efficient way to do it. The main thing is to make separate partitions for Win32, Win64 and data files when you install Win32 in the first place. The two OSs can share the same data files, incuding stuff like email.

  • Enabling GPU for WinXP 32 bit in CS5

    Need some help.  I've been looking through the registry under Adobe and found under Shockwave 11 two folders.  renderer3dsetting and renderer3dsettingPerm.  Do these have anything to do with Photoshop CS5's default to grey out the GPU acceleration in WinXP 32 bit?
    I know my card has GPU and OpenGL.
    Or is this stuff for the internet?

    Just to let you know, Chris is the guy who programmed Photoshop to do that, so I think you can probably trust what he says over what you've interpreted from Adobe's web site.
    -Noel

  • EAP/TLS , PEAP problem on PORTEGE with WinXP sp2 Tablet ed.

    We have: ap Cisco AiroNet350 with WPA-EAP, Freeradius with configured EAP/TLS and PEAP, tablet PC PORTEGE with WinXP sp2.
    This problem discribed at http://wiki.freeradius.org/index.php/FAQ#PEAP_Doesn.27t_Work
    Maybe to solve this problem we need a fix ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/885453/en-us ), but microsoft support tells to contact with notebook manufacturer.
    Can anybody help me with this problem?

    Hmmm Im not expert on this field but it seems that the MS OS update is need. (I hope)
    The preinstalled Windows OS is a simply OEM version and usually every updates should be possible. However, if the MS guys told you to contact the notebook manufacture so you can contact the Toshiba authorized service provider in your country for more details.
    But I have investigated a little bit in the net and found this useful site:
    http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid7_gci945257,00.html
    1. 802.1X depends on communication between your wireless router and a RADIUS authentication server. Whether you're using WPA2, WPA, or WEP with dynamic keys, the following 802.1X debugging hints can be helpful:
    a. Re-enter the same RADIUS secret into your wireless router and RADIUS server.
    b. Configure your RADIUS server to accept RADIUS request from your router's IP address.
    c. Use ping to verify router-to-server reachability.
    d. Watch LAN packet counts to verify that RADIUS requests and responses are flowing.
    e. Use an Ethernet analyzer like Ethereal to watch RADIUS success/failure messages.
    f. For XP SP2, turn on Wzctrace.log by entering "netsh ras set tracing * enabled"
    2. If RADIUS is flowing but access requests are being rejected, you may have an 802.1X Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) mismatch or credential problem. Fixing this depends on EAP Type. For example, if your RADIUS server requires EAP-TLS, then select "Smart Card or other Certificate" on your wireless adapter's Network Properties / Authentication panel. If your RADIUS server requires PEAP, then select "Protected EAP" for the adapter. If your RADIUS server requires EAP-TTLS, then you'll need a third-party wireless client like AEGIS or Odyssey.
    Make sure that EAP-specific properties match for your adapter and server, including server certificate Trusted Root Authority, server domain name (optional but must match when specified), and client authentication method (e.g., EAP-MSCHAPv2, EAP-GTC). When using PEAP, use the CHAP "Configure" panel to prevent Windows from automatically re-using your logon.

  • Website mp3 not playing WinXP 64-bit using Firefox but plays using IE

    I have a website with embedded mp3 soundtracks that work fine when using IE but not with Firefox (latest version.11Beta). Have tried all the suggested plug-ins to no avail. Running WinXP 64-bit
    2003 SP2. Video & soundtrack works fine on other websites such as u-tube.

    That's because Firefox doesn't support playing mp3 files. It will play them if they are contained in a Flash audio or video player (like youtube) but not by themselves. If you are using the <audio> html element you can define multiple source files. Here are some instructions from our developer website - https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Using_HTML5_audio_and_video You can create an Ogg audio file that will work with Firefox by using a program like Audacity - http://audacity.sourceforge.net/

  • MS5169 with WinXP

    Do you know if this motherboard works with WinXP SP2?
    Thanks For all
    Vito

    System Requirements for Windows XP Service Pack 2
    Published: August 20, 2004
    To install the service pack, your computer must have a CD-ROM drive or Internet connection and meet the following minimum requirements:
    • 233 megahertz (MHz) processor
    • 64 megabytes (MB) of RAM
    • 1.8 GB of available hard disk space during installation
    To determine whether your computer meets these requirements:
    • Click Start, right-click My Computer and then click Properties. On the General tab, under Computer, you will see your computer's processor speed and RAM listed.
    Note: If you want to download and install Service Pack 2, but you are not using Internet Explorer, please visit the Download Center.
    Top of page
    Which versions of Windows you can update with SP2
    If you are running one of the following versions of Windows, you can update it with Service Pack 2:
    • Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
    • Microsoft Windows XP Professional
    • Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition and Microsoft Windows XP Media Center Edition 2004.
    (If you install Service Pack 2 onto a computer running Windows XP Media Center Edition, your operating system is upgraded to Windows XP Media Center Edition 2004.)
    • Microsoft Windows XP Tablet PC Edition
    (If you install Service Pack 2 onto a computer running Windows XP Tablet PC Edition, your operating system is upgraded to Windows XP Tablet PC Edition 2005. After you install Service Pack 2 and restart your computer, the Welcome to Tablet PC window opens. It provides links to information about the new operating system, including tutorials.)
    To find out which version of Windows your computer is running, click Start, right-click My Computer and then click Properties. On the General tab, under System, the Windows product and version number are listed.
    You cannot use Windows XP SP2 to update the following operating systems:
    • Microsoft Windows Millennium Edition or other earlier Windows operating systems
    • Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Version 2003
    • Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition
    Top of page
    What to expect
    Due to the number and type of security features it delivers, Windows XP SP2 is a significant update. Here are a few tips about the time and computer memory required to install Service Pack 2, what you'll see as you install it, and what might change after you install the service pack:
    • Hard disk space: You need at least 1.8 gigabytes (GB) of free space on your hard disk.
    To check your free disk space, click Start, click My Computer, and right-click Local Disk (C:) or the name of the drive you're installing Service Pack 2 on, and then click Properties.
    • Time: The time it takes to download and install Service Pack 2 depends on many factors, but especially on the following:
    • Whether your computer meets the Windows XP SP2 system requirements.
    • Whether you have completed the recommended steps below before you download SP2.
    • The speed of your Internet connection. Downloading SP2 is recommended for high-speed and broadband Internet connections. If you use a slow connection, it's a good idea to turn on Automatic Updates. That way SP2 will download in the background while you're connected to the Internet.
    No matter how long it takes, it's a good idea to stay at your computer throughout the installation process in case you need to enter any information or respond to the Installation Wizard.
    Hope this helps!

  • PROBLEM with 24/96 bit-rate USB DAC that worked fine until I plugged in two

    I'm using a late 2008 15" Macbook Pro that I bought Jan 2009 right before the SD card models came out. Mac OSX 10.6.4 and iTunes 9.2 are installed. I have a Nuforce Icon HDP and a CEntrance DACport 24/96 bit-rate USB DAC (external sound cards) that still work great right now. Note - 16 bit/44 Khz is CD quality, and these 24/96 files are hi-resolution downloads that are closer to SACD or DVD audio.
    I have been evaluating a new third 24/96 USB DAC plugged directly into the Macbook USB port (no hub) which has been working fine for over 2 weeks with 24/96 bit-rate lossless music files in iTunes. Audio Midi Setup is set for 24/96 to match the music file's resolution. After making suggestions to the manufacturer they made some improvements and sent me a new version to listen for the differences.
    I listened to the new one for a day and it worked fine, but when I plugged in the original test sample into the second USB port at the same time as the new one in order to compare them, the sound became garbled and noisy. This never happened when either one was plugged in by itself. Note, if I make changes to the DAC's bit-rate in Audio Midi Setup I usually close iTunes first and then re-open it when I am done.
    Upon hearing this new problem I unplugged both of the new USB DACs and plugged just one of them back in, but now it causes iTunes music playback to pause when one is plugged in and set for 24/96 in audio midi setup. Prior to plugging in both at the same time, either one worked just fine by itself. There is no reason when unplugging one or the other that they shouldn't start working again. But now I can't play any 24/96 music through either one anymore. In quicktime player the songs don't pause like with iTunes, but there is no sound coming through even with just one DAC plugged in at a time. Then I discovered that if I go into Audio Midi Setup application and lower the bit rate to 24/48 then iTunes will resume playing again and I can hear the music fine with iTunes or Quicktime player.
    Basically, my Macbook Pro has now lost the ability to play 24/96 bit rate with either of these new USB DACs, when they both worked fine before I plugged them in at the same time. More confusing is that they use the same USB receiver chip as in one of the DACs that I mentioned above in the first paragraph, and both the HDP and DACport still work fine at 24/96 bit-rate. It's only these two new USB DAC that require me to lower the bit rate in Audio Midi Setup to 24/48 in order to listen through them, and this wasn't a problem as recently as yesterday!
    The computer is acting like some setting needs to be wiped out - it's DEFINITELY NOT the USB DAC's that are faulty because they still both work fine at 24/96 on my wife's iMac (I'm afraid to try plugging in both at the same time to the iMac in case I screw that Mac up too).
    I have reset the PRAM a few times, and this doesn't fix the problem. I thought maybe the com.apple.audiomidisetup.plist file could be corrupted and deleted it, but that didn't help. I don't know what to try next to get the Macbook to start fresh when trying to use these devices, short of having to re-install OSX.
    Please, does anyone have a suggestion of how I can make the Macbook forget it ever saw these two USB DACs, and let me start fresh so they start working normally again? I do dozens of reviews for Head-fi.org and I can't afford to have my Macbook Pro compromised like this, which could prevent me from doing some reviews or evaluating new products.

    UPDATE:
    As noted in the first post, both of these newer USB DAC work fine at 24/96 on my wife's iMac, so it's clear that they didn't both become defective when I connected them to the Macbook Pro at the same time.
    Resetting the Macbook Pro PRAM didn't help, so I removed the hard shell laptop case to get to the battery and remove it, then reset the SMC. After that I could use the original DAC at 24/96 again, but only IF it was plugged into the rear USB port. If I plugged it into the front USB port then the sound was garbled and filled with noise. This was a vast improvement over no sound at all.
    Then I switched to the replacement/updated DAC, but I got no sound at all from either USB port at any bit-rate. And returning to the original DAC again now results in no sound again.
    Sigh... I will reset the PRAM and SMC again, and see how far I can get with this. I'd still love some help. Thanks!

  • Internet Security Suite does not work with Vista 64 bit

    After attempting to use the Chat Help, twice, and spending hours in queue before getting kicked off, I finally called Support to find out why my new Vista computer was not running the Internet Security Suite that I downloaded.  Yes, I found the link to "download to a second computer" and went thru all the steps.  Got lots of positive feedback: little bars were filling in letting me know I was 40%, 72%, 100% done, etc..  Was given a window allowing me to Run or Don't Run the software.  It all seemed to go very well.  However, when the "download and installation" was complete, there was no new software running anywhere on my computer.  Couldn't find it in the Control Panel, the Start menu, or the system tray.  Called Support and spent at least 30 minutes on the phone with a "technician" (and I use that term VERY loosely) who had to have major assistance from a co-worker before he could even start screen-sharing with me and, during the course of our time together, made the following brilliant remarks:
    Upon seeing my desktop wallpaper (which is a lovely photo of some cliffs and a lake - and it came with Vista), he wanted to know what the picture was.  Not where it was taken, but just what it was.  His exact comment was "Does your screen always look like that?".  I had to dig deeper to determine if he was asking about a particular icon or some other computer related concern that he saw (he was "technical support", after all), but he was just asking about the stupid photo.
    He couldn't find the Control Panel in the Start Menu until after trying several times, and then he couldn't navigate to the Programs area very well (I had to give verbal hints as to where it was), and his brilliant comment then was "I really need to go to my mom's house and get on her new laptop and try out Vista."  Can you believe that Verizon has technical support folks who have never used Vista?  It's not like Vista just came on the market yesterday!!
    So, when he finally decided that he was not going to be able to help me, he didn't offer me any other recourse.  He just stated over and over that he was not sure how to solve this issue.  Oh, and this was after I re-downloaded ISS (again, "successfully").  I had to ask if there was someone else there who could possibly help me.  He offered to put me on hold (for the 2nd or 3rd time at this point) to check around.  When he returned to the phone, it was obvious that someone else was operating the mouse in the screen sharing mode because the operator moved confidentially around the screen and went immediately to system properties and saw that I am running Windows 64 bit.  The other operator then told my guy to tell me that ISS only works with Windows 32 bit.  Their final resolution was that I should call billing on Monday and end my subscription.  I think that may be the only good advice I was given that day.
    So, am probably going to renew my trial version of Norton on this new computer and remove ISS from the laptop and put Norton on there as well.  Apparently, they are up to date with this fancy new technology.  At least they probably know about sophisticated and highly technical stuff like desktop wallpaper.

    I have been trying to get somewhere with this Internet Security Suite...and now have come to the conclusion this is not going to work.  Now running Vista 64 bit, and have gotten nothing but the run around to try to complete the downloading of the program.  I've contacted Verizon Tech Support...then tell me that this works with the 64 bit but I need to contact Windows as there is a glitch and they give you the steps to get thru it.  Windows advises me to contact Verizon again as there are no problems with the OS.  Also have contacted Radialpoint and once again nothing...Obviously the Secuirty is not compatible with Vista 64 bit yet, which I just can't believe like you said...it's not like it was just yesterday this OS came out.  My frusteration comes from nobody steps up to take any responsibility as to what the problem is.  If it is not compatible yet then say so and not waste my whole weekend trying to get a straight answer.  I have other computers that I am currently using the service on and do like the program, but as for my Vista 64 bit looks like I may go to Macafee for protection.  It just amazes me as big as Verizon is and as popular this Vista has become they are not on the ball in keeping up with technology.

  • Itunes 7.6 whats with Vista 64 bit???

    Hallo. Apple whrite that 7.6 goes with Vist 64 bit, but my iphone doesn´t work
    Can anybody help me?

    Roy B wrote:
    th3_r3n3g4d3:
    Can you try something for me?
    Download and install the QuickTime 7.4 standalone installer(without iTunes), install it, and report back your results? You can get it here: http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/
    Thanks,
    Roy
    Unfortunately, no.
    It does not work correctly, I actually had to do a system restore. It broke a few things. Most noticeably my quick launch bar quit working. The icons were present but clicking them did nothing, it would not re-size correctly, etc.
    I wont be putting it back on the PC any time soon.

  • Microsoft Office Starter is a 32 bit program, why was it sold with my 64 bit Window 7 PC?

    I purchased my PC because it came with Microsoft Office 2010 (so said the advertisement). I installed the Microsoft Office Starter as I was prompted. There was no option to select my OS otherwise I would've selected Windows 7 64 bit. I noticed the program
    was installed as 32 bit and Word will not print my files. Why would you develop a 32 bit program to be sold on a 64 bit Operating System? Is there a 64 bit version I can download that I'm unaware of?

    Hello,
    As mentioned in the TechNet article, the 32-bit version of Office 2010 provides the same functionality and is also compatible with 32-bit add-ins. Therefore, the 32-bit version
    of Office 2010 is installed by default.
    64bit Office has better performance when running a single Excel larger than 2GB and also better performance when using Project files.
    For normal use, 32bit Office did provide good performance
    and more compatibility with existing
    32-bit add-ins.
    So, don’t worry about the 32bit or 64bit, go and enjoy Office 2010 new features!
    Daisy Cao
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for