Pending Rentention amount payable to vendor

Is any procedure or report where we can get the retention amount which is not paid to the vendor?

Hi,
Use FBL1N only - while posting Vendor Invoice system will automatically split line items as per our retention Process /configuration with Payment Block
it will show in Vendor ledger FBL1N
Thanking you
Mahesh

Similar Messages

Interest calculation on overdue amount payable to vendors

hi gurus
i have a doubt on interest calculation on overdue amount payable to vendors,can you tell me interest calculation procedure.

hope below link are useful"
http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/sapfj001.htm
http://help.sap.com/bestpractices/BBLibrary/Documentation/J03_AR_BPP_05_EN_SG.doc
pls assign points as way to say thanks

Seperate GL account for rentention amount using Instalment payment?

We have an interesting issue, our client is having a requirement regarding installment payment. Please find below the scenario. We hope to get some ideas in this regard.
We are using payment term with settings for installment payment.
Example: Payment term Y001 Installment payment, Y002 Installment payment 90% and Y003 Installment payment 10%.
Invoice Amount : 1000
90 % outstanding for immediate payment : 900 (to be accounted in Vendor reconciliation account)
10% retention till tax certificate produced : 100 (to be accounted under separate retention GL account)
While posting invoice through MIRO & FB60, our client wants to split the amount in to two parts 90% outstanding to the Vendors and retain 10% of the invoice value till the tax returns certificate is produced. Presently Amount splitting is made to take care of this using a payment block in payment term Y003. This helps in retaining 10% of the amount till the tax paid certificate is produced.
Postings are happening with the split amount, to the reconciliation account maintained for the Vendors. This is presently showing the total payables towards vendors. But for statutory reporting purpose, we now need to maintain a separate GL account for the retention amount. This is again required to be a Vendor reconciliation account for control over outstanding amounts with respect to respective vendors.
We are exploring different alternatives to get this done. Please advice if you have come across any such scenario.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Viswanath

I understand when you use your Installment payment term, system must be posting two lines for vendor i guess must be like;
Expense                      Dr.   1000
     Vendor                                     Cr. 900
     Vendor                                     Cr. 100
Ok eventually both 900 and 100 goes to the same GL (Reconciliation)Account but your client wants that the 100 should goes to other GL accounts.
One of our collegue in this forun has answered you to use Special Gl Indicator, the solution upto some extent ok but i guess you will loose the automation of amount splitting which 900 and 100.
So i would advice you the following;
Create one Retention Reconciliation Account
Configure Alternative/Reconcilation Account in the IMG ( This config allows you to change reconciliation account while posting invoice )
So at time when you simulate your accounting entry double click on 100 line and manually enter the retention GL Account. I guess the solution is manual and painfull but if special gl indicator can be used with automation then you must go with that
regards,
FICO

Amount detalis for vendor

want to know amount detalis for vendor
vendor creation involves purchase organization , account etc.
when a vendor do some finicial transaction then that amount is stored in some table .
Can we find out the transaction ( amount ) done by vendor using *Purchase Organization *
Purchase Organization can show the actual transaction ( amount ) for vendor. ?
Thanks

Thanks sir,
Yes, m clear about my requirement.
i want to know the about vendor and Purchase organization .( Can Pur org show amount used by vendor in that purchse org )
Reason for this is my object on which , i am working.
giving details : report display vendors liabilities .
tables used lfa1,lfb1, bsik, LFM1.
input for report lfa1-lifnr , lfb1-bukrs , bsik-budat , lfm1-ekorg
( because this is vendor aging report . m picking EKORG from LFM1 and not from EKKO table )
my report is working fine with vendors that belong to different purchase organizations. It gives monthly amount transaction done. ( working fine ). ( amount is picked from bsik-dmbtr )
but the main problem is when a same vendor belongs to different purchase organizations.
in that case same vendor with different purchase organizations show same amount transactions.
because only one vendor is having record to bsik table.
this is the main concern about purchase organization can bifercate vendor (amount )
How can i do that ? because bsik table has no ekorg field . Please suggest me how to solve this ?
One solution can be create different vendor code ( actually same vendor) to different purchase organizations .
say 2567 vendor belongs to HCL and linked to Pur Org a200.
create 2568 vendor belongs to HCL (same company ) to link to Pur Org b200.
we have different pur org c200, e200 for different products.
Is it a good idea. if yes how to modify already existing same vendors in diferent pur org ?
vendor 2531 is in a200 and b200.
Do suggestions
Thanks

Cheque Amounts for Foreign Vendors

Hi All,
My cheques for canadian vendors are printing fine, but my cheque amounts for foreign vendors have the wrong format.
Eg.: 1,317,150.00 is printing 1.317.150,00 (The commas are being replaced by periods and vice versa).
Amounts for both Canadian and foreign vendors are in CAD$.
How can I set the format to display correctly? Points will be awared generously!!
Thanks,
Deki

I didn't change any parameters. They were set correctly to begin with. Any other ways I can fix this?
Thanks,
Deki

Table containing due date and billing amount of a vendor

Dear Friends,
I need to get the due date and billing amount of the vendors.So please let me know which DDIC table will give me this information.
thanks,
jeevan.

Hai madhu,
Thanks for ur time .
pls be there i am working on ur sugesstions and will let you abt the progress...
So do u say we cannt fetch the due date for a vendor payment.
thanks,
jeevan

Retention amount paid to vendor is not updated in PO history tab

Dear All,
I had activated business function 'LOG_MMFI_P2P'. As a result i am getting Payment processing tab in PO.
There i can define Down payment and Retention percentages. I had created a service purchase order and then service entry sheet.
After the acceptance of service entry sheet i did invoicing (MIRO). Here i get an option to clear down payment (an additional button becomes available to clear down payment). That scenario is working perfectly fine. System also proposes the retention amount. I can change retention amount/percentage or continue with same.After invoice is posted the retention amount is visible under PO history tab against Invoice number.
Now my problem is when i am doing payment of retention amount(after doing payment of services deducting down payment and retention) to vendor the 'Posted Retention in Document Currency' column in PO history tab is not updated.
Regards,
Kamal

Dear Pankaj,
Thanks for quick Reply.
I think you did not understand my question. In PO history tab for down payment scenario (defined through PO and cleared in MIRO) proper lines are getting created. For retention new line will not be created. But the invoice row in PO history tab is having two columns -
1) Retention in Document Currency.
2) Posted Retention in Document Currency.
The first column is having value which is the retention amount. But second column is not having any value even after the payment (portion held as retention)is made.
I will add one more thing. If i run FK10N for the vendor- then Special G/L account for retention is updated properly.
Regards,
Kamal
Edited by: kamal.anandani1 on Apr 22, 2011 8:02 AM

F110/ FBZP - maximum amount paid per Vendor in Payment run

Hi
How do i create payment run where i want to restrict the maximum paid to a vendor per transaction.
If amount exceeds this, i still wish to pay, but to split over more than one payment order
Our BACS payments are now being processed via FASTER PAYMENTS, and there seems to be a limit of £100,000 per transaction per vendor - anything over is being rejected by danske bank
So far example above, if vendor is due 156,000 - i wish to make this payment still to them, but over 2 or 2 payment orders, none of them to be more than 100,000
I have tried several methods via FBZP by using the maximum amount, but none of my settings seem to work so far,
Please advise
Many thanks for your help
Tony

Hi Tony,
Not exactly the solution, but going forward you can try split the invoices and process it separately at the time of invoicing itself. Otherwise you can try the option installment payment terms, but there may be at least one day difference in payment.
Warm regards,
Murukan Arunachalam

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

Withholding tax amount display in vendor master data

Hi All,
When i executining the Vendor line item Display (FBL1N), i want to see the Withholding tax amount, withholding tax base amount. I changed the layout for display, i can't able to see withholding tax amount for Doc type RE.
Thanks & Regards
SUNITHA.P

HI
try this... define screen layout per activity (Vendors)... there in company code data u have to make wht code details as req entry... path SPRO>IMG>Financial accounting>ARAP>Vendor accounts>Master data>define screen layout per activity (Vendors)
hope this helps u
if it helps u pls give points

Budget for the vendor Vs actual amount spend on vendor

Hi all,
how to find the budget for the vendor and the actual amount spend on one vendor.
What are the table names and where can we find this data.
Thank you.

Hi,
What do you meand by 'budget for a vendor'? The tables for the items can be found in BSIK/BSAK tables (uncleared/cleared items).
Regards,
Eli

Pending Invoice amount - Table field

Hello experts,
Is there a table field in SAP that indicates balance payment amount for an invoice?
(Pending amount = Invoice amount - Payment amount).
I know that we can calculate it but need to know if there is one field that indicates it. Would like to use SQ01 for reporting this!!
Any input is appreciated and rewarded.
Thanks
UV

Hello uv/Prasanna,
Can u pls let me know where can I get Invoice Payment Amount.
I know BSIK-WRBTR is the Invoice Amount
Thanks
Jagadish

Reconciled amounts appears in vendor aging report

Dear all,
When we take report for reconciled transactions,reconciled amounts appears in
aging days(Suppose we have ap invoice in 0-30 days and payments made in 30-60 days it's
already reconciled)
Why it is showing in reconciled aging report ?
Jeyakanthan

Dear，
would like to recommend you to refer to the following note： 1228363-Business Partner Balance does not match journal entries。
In any SAP Business One version lower than 2007, 2 separate
reconciliation engines were employed. One reconciliation engine worked
on the marketing document level, where partial reconciliation was
supported & the other worked on the journal entry level, where only
complete reconciliation was supported.
This duality led in some instances to reconciliation inconsistencies
which were initially highlighted with SAP Business One version 2004
patch level 29, where the red message 'Business Partner balance does not
match journal entries' was displayed when running the ageing report by
sales documents & inconsistencies were detected.
In the year end closing guides (available for download from the
Documentation Resource Centre) SAP have always recommended to run the
ageing reports by journal posting.
In 2006, SAP published note 752261, now retired, documenting the system
behaviour & offering a series of 'Select' queries to aid in
reconciliation inconsistency analysis. These queries were an excellent
tool but now SAP can offer a faster, better & more accurate solution.
In SAP Business One 2007 A & B the reconciliation engines have been
unified & partial reconciliation on journal entry level is now fully
supported. Any database that is upgraded from a lower version undergoes
a complex series of reconciliation upgrade algorithms, where any
reconciliation inconsistency is identified & a reconciliation upgrade
(RU) journal entry is automatically created. This RU journal does not
document any accounting transaction, but simply creates an update in the
'Balance Due' column, thus notionally re-openeing previously
inconsistently reconciled transactions.
These RU journals are then available for internal reconciliation.
Please consult the 2007 Internal Reconciliation Upgrade(IRU)Landing
Page:
Channel Partner Portal -> Solutions -> SAP Business One -> Hot Topics ->
SAP Business One 2007 Information Center -> New Single Reconciliation
Engine- A single engine reconciles the difference and eliminates the
previous reconciliation issue. More
Click on 'More' to be directed to the IRU Landing Page.
Here you will find 'How-to-Guides' in all supported languages, links to
Expert Training Sessions & links to other pertinent information.
You will also find available for download 2007 A & B upgrade simulation
tools. SAP recommends to subject a database that is planned to be
upgraded
This upgrade simulation tool employs all internal reconciliation upgrade
algorithms & the application will display in the 'Internal
Reconciliation Upgrade Audit Trail Report' if a database is affected by
inconcistencies.
Hence, if the message 'Business Partner Balance does not match Journal
Entries' is encountered, proceed as follows:
Option 1:
Upgrade database to SAP Business One 2007 & internally reconcile any RU
journals.
Option 2:
Go to the IRU landing page & download the 'IRU pre-upgrade tool' either
for version 2007A or 2007B, depending on your localisation. Follow the
installation instructions & after successful installation & simulated
upgarde of the database, analyse any inconsistencies appearing with the
help of the How-to-guide. Should a type of inconsistency not have a drop
down arrow & be described as 'Balancing upgrade journal transaction',
the comapny accountant may decide to write it off, should the amount be
insignificant or, if the amount is not insignificant, please log a
support ticket with the component:
SBO-ADM-UT-IAT
Step by step detailed instructions including screenshots of how to
install the sim-tool & what it does can be found on this wiki page:
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/B1/BPaccountBalancedoesnot+matc
chJournalEntries
Thanks & Regards
Apple

In 27q form Amount deducted and amount payable are not matching

Dear All
Here we made a z programm for form 24 qa as zf24q.But what is happening means in the excell the Amount Tax deducted and Tax deposited is showing correctly but in display these two amounts are not matching.so kindly give any suggestion for me
Regards
lakshman

not answered yet.

Error:withholding tax base amount exceeds the amount of customer/vendor lin

Dear Team,
I am encountering an issue while doing f-48.I am providing you brief explanation below:
There are two different down payment request has been made against two difference P.Ou2019s.
1. Down payment amount for P.O No. 3600011383 is Rs. 581235/- and
2. Another Down Payment for P.O No. 3600011395 is Rs. 1162470/-
Now we want to deduct the TDS against Sl No. 1 is Rs. 21,50,570 ( i.e., Rs. 581235+1569335 (P.O No. 3600011383
Simply, TDS Deduction are as follows :
Sl No. 1 Withholding Base amount should be 2150570/- instead of 581235/- and
SL No. 2 Withholding Base amount should be Rs. 1162470/-.
Plz do the need

Hi Rajeswari ,
The amount is mentioned as the base amount in PO.At the time of Downpayment they want to change the base amount instead of 581235 the user want to give the base amount 21,50,570 the mentioned like.But system is showing the message like the above .Plz let me know.
Regards,
Suma.

Pending Rentention amount payable to vendor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for