Performance issues with SAP BPC 7.0/7.5 (SP06, 07, 08) NW

Hi Experts
There are some performance issues with SAP BPC 7.5/7.0 NW, users are saying they are not getting data or there are some issues while getting data from R/3 system or ECC 6.0. Then what things do I need to consider to check, such as what DataSources or Cubes I need to check? So, how to solve this issue?
What things I need to consider for SAP NW BI 7.0 u2013 SAP BPC 7.5 NW (SP06, 07, 08) Implementation?
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Qadeer

Hi,
New SP was released in February, and now most of the new bugs should been caught ,This has a Central Note. For SP06 it's Note 1527325 - Planning and Consolidation 7.5 SP06 NetWeaver Central Note to fix any issues. Most of the improvements in SP06 were related to performance, especially when logging on from the BPC clients.There you should be able to find a big list of fixes/improvements and Notes that describe those. Some of the Notes even have test description how to reproduce that issue in the old version.
hope this will help you
Regards
Rv

Similar Messages

BPC 7 performance issue with Microsoft 2003 vs Microsoft 2007

Hi All,
Needs some help with our performance issues with BPC 7 on Microsoft 2007. We have noticed a significant difference between the two versions. When running the same report on BPC 7 MS 2003 it takes roughly around 5-6 min. When running the same report in BPC 7 MS 2007 the report takes roughly 15-20 min. We've tried numerous things to figure out what can be causing this but does anyone have the same issue or shed some light as to what i can do to eliminate this problem?
Thanks,
Elmer

Hi,
Did you install the following component on your application server (which is a prerequisite for running Excel 2007)? This note is part of the installation guide:
In order for the software to function correctly in Excel 2007, you must install the Microsoft Office 2007 system driver Data Connectivity Components, which you can get from the Microsoft web site. The components must be installed on the Application server. We recommend that you install all of the latest Microsoft Windows hotfixes prior to installing the Administration client. For information about which hotfixes to install, see http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=7554F536-8C28-4598-9B72-EF94E038C891&DisplayLang=en.
Hope this will help.
Kind Regards,
Patrick

Performance Issue with RF Scanners after SAP Enhancement Pack 5 Upgrade

We are on component version SAP ECC 6.0, and recently upgraded to Enhancement Pack 5. I believe we are on Net Weaver 7.10, and using RF scanners in one plant that is Warehouse Managed. Evidentially when we moved to EHP5, the Web SAP Console went away and we are left with ITS Mobile. This has created several issues and continues to be a performance barrier for the forklift drivers in the warehouse. We see there is a high use of java script, and the processors canu2019t handle this. When we login to tcode LM00, on a laptop or desktop computer, there are no performance issues. When we login to tcode LM00, with the RF scanners, the system is very slow. It might take 30 seconds to confirm one item on a WM Transfer Order.
1.) Can we revert back to Web SAP Console, after we have upgraded to EHP5?
2.) What is creating the performance issues with the RF Scanners now that we switched over to SAP ITS mobile?
Our RF Scanners are made by Intermec, but I donu2019t think that is where the solution lies. One person in our IT Operations has spent a good deal of time configuring SAPITS to get it to work, but still it isnu2019t performing.

Tom,
I am sorry I did not see this earlier.
I'm currently working on a very similar project with ITS mobile and the problem is to accurately determine the root cause of the problem in the least amount of time. The tool that works is found here: http://www.connectrf.com/index.php/mcm/managed-diagnostics/
Isolating the network from the application and the device is a time consuming process unless you have a piece of software that can trace the HTTP transaction between host and device on both wired and wireless side of the network. Once that is achieved (as with Connect's tool) you can then you can begin to solve the problem.
What I found in my project is that the amount of data traffic generated by ITS mobile can be reduced drastically, which speeds the response time of the mobile devices, especially with large number of devices in distribution centers.
Let me know if I can answer more questions related to this topic.
Cheers,
Shari

SAP DS 1.3: Performance issues with crosstab planning (IE only)

Hi everyone,
because im currently developing a custom component for DS 1.3, I got in touch with the planning feature of design studio. Planning currently only works in a crosstab.
Here I recognized a significant performance issue with the internet explorer:
If you simply type in a new value into a cell in a crosstab, it takes ~10s to confirm it (not constant! Sometimes it takes 2s, sometimes 15s). During this 10s, it seems like the IE crashed - no response at all. Sometimes there is also a warning message on bottom ('... script is slowing down the application ...').
Tested the same scenario with Chrome and FF - takes less than 1s to confirm.
Whats going on here ...? Anyone experienced the same issues?
My testing environment:
Windows 8.1
IE 11 (also tested emulated Ie 10 and IE 9 - same problem)
DS 1.3.0.3.201405141058
Local mode
Application only contained a simple crosstab, data source based on BW 7.3 query
Of course I deactivated all custom components while testing...
Kind regards
Wladimir

Hi Tammy,
Thanks for your reply. Of course, my IE is updated to latest version (11.0.9600.17207).
Hopefully SP1 will fix this bug...
Kind regards
Wladimir

Performance issue with HRALXSYNC report..

HI,
I'm facing performance issue with the HRALXSYNC report. As this is Standard report, Can any body suggest me how to optimize the standard report..
Thanks in advance.
Saleem Javed
Moderator message: Please Read before Posting in the Performance and Tuning Forum, also look for existing SAP notes and/or send a support message to SAP.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Aug 23, 2011 4:17 PM

Sreedhar,
Thanks for you quick response. Indexes were not created for VBPA table. basis people tested by creating indexes and gave a report that it is taking more time with indexes than regular query optimizer. this is happening in the funtion forward_ag_selection.
select vbeln lifnr from vbpa
     appending corresponding fields of table lt_select
     where     vbeln in ct_vbeln
     and     posnr eq posnr_initial
     and     parvw eq 'SP'
     and     lifnr in it_spdnr.
I don't see any issue with this query. I give more info later

ERP Sales Order : Performance issues with Product Proposal

Hi
we are working on CRM 2007 solution and are facing serious performance issues with the ERP Sales Order functionality provided in the ICWC of this version.
In our development we are adding items in the ERP cart as soon as the user clicks on the 'New Sales Order' button of the sales order sreen. We get the items by very simple and optimized call to the ERP system and then add these entities in the Item Cart (Item collection ...in simple sense).
For adding 10 items the application takes 10 seconds and this is too much for adding just 10 items.
Can you please provide any Notes/alternative solution to resolve this issue.
Regards
Ajitabh

Hi Ajithabh,
Please apply the following SAP notes:
1061423 - Interaction Center ERP Order Performance improvement
1262277 - Performance: CRM value help causes dumps in ERP
1292817 - Performance: Reduce RFC calls during creation of ERP order.
1319885 - ERP sales order search with external reference
1326527 - Reducing number of RFC calls in IC ERP Sales Order
I hope it helps!
Regards,
Gabriel Santana

Performance issue with view selection after migration from oracle to MaxDb

Hello,
After the migration from oracle to MaxDb we have serious performance issues with a lot of our tableview selections.
Does anybody know about this problem and how to solve it ??
Best regards !!!
Gert-Jan

Hello Gert-Jan,
most probably you need additional indexes to get better performance.
Using the command monitor you can identify the long running SQL statements and check the optimizer access strategy. Then you can decide which indexes might help.
If this is about an SAP system, you can find additional information about performance analysis in SAP notes 725489 and 819641.
SAP Hosting provides the so-called service 'MaxDB Migration Support' to help you in such cases. The service description can be found here:
http://www.saphosting.de/mediacenter/pdfs/solutionbriefs/MaxDB_de.pdf
http://www.saphosting.com/mediacenter/pdfs/solutionbriefs/maxDB-migration-support_en.pdf.
Best regards,
Melanie Handreck

Performance issue with BSEG

Hi,
 I am having serious performance issue due to BSEG table .I am having a change request in which I have to solve the performance issue with regard to BSEG. The situation was that previously they had used select * on both BKPF and BSEG. I removed the select * and selected only those fields which are required as shown below. I also tried using cursors. But the problem is happening in the TEST server where BSEG is having more than 1 crore entries. I have gone through some threads but still not able to understand how to solve this problem. Please help
select bukrs belnr gjahr bldat bstat from bkpf into table T_BKPF_p
 WHERE BUKRS IN sd_bukrs AND
 BLDAT < s_bldat-low
 and BSTAT = ' ' .
select bukrs belnr gjahr shkzg dmbtr hkont from bseg into table T_BSEG_C
 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_BKPF_p
 WHERE BUKRS = T_bkpf_p-bukrs
 AND BELNR = T_bkpf_p-belnr
 AND GJAHR = T_bkpf_p-gjahr
 AND HKONT = SKB1-SAKNR.

Hi Kunal,
Here is my take on your issue.
In your select statement on BKPF you are selecting every BKPF record for a specified company code and blank document status that was created before a specified date. If your company has implemented SAP 10 years ago, and your user enters todays date and leaves the company code field blank you will effectively be retrieving almost all the records from BKPF (excluding the ones created today or those with non-blank document status). This would effectively be a huge amount of data. After that you are looking for the corresponding BSEG records for all the records that you have selected in BKPF.
My question to you is why do you need to look at all the records before a given date? Why not ask the user to enter a smaller date range and make the document date and the company code a mandatory entry? You do not have to look at 10 years worth of data especially if you are running this online (as opposed to in the background).
Your BSEG select looks correct. There is very little that you can do except for adding BUZEI to the field list. If you use for all entries and do not include the entire primary key you could lose data.
TABLES: bkpf,
 skb1.
SELECT-OPTIONS: s_bldat FOR bkpf-bldat OBLIGATORY,
 sd_bukrs FOR bkpf-bukrs OBLIGATORY.
TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_bkpf,
 bukrs TYPE bkpf-bukrs,
 belnr TYPE bkpf-belnr,
 gjahr TYPE bkpf-gjahr,
 bldat TYPE bkpf-bldat,
 bstat TYPE bkpf-bstat,
 END OF ty_bkpf,
 BEGIN OF ty_bseg,
 bukrs TYPE bseg-bukrs,
 belnr TYPE bseg-belnr,
 gjahr TYPE bseg-gjahr,
 buzei TYPE bseg-buzei,
 shkzg TYPE bseg-shkzg,
 dmbtr TYPE bseg-dmbtr,
 hkont TYPE bseg-hkont,
 END OF ty_bseg.
DATA: t_bkpf_p TYPE TABLE OF ty_bkpf,
 t_bseg_c TYPE TABLE OF ty_bseg.
SELECT bukrs
 belnr
 gjahr
 bldat
 bstat
FROM bkpf
INTO TABLE t_bkpf_p
WHERE bukrs IN sd_bukrs
AND bldat IN s_bldat
AND bstat EQ space .
IF NOT t_bkpf_p[] IS INITIAL.
SELECT bukrs
 belnr
 gjahr
 buzei
 shkzg
 dmbtr
 hkont
 FROM bseg
 INTO TABLE t_bseg_c
 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_bkpf_p
 WHERE bukrs EQ t_bkpf_p-bukrs
 AND belnr EQ t_bkpf_p-belnr
 AND gjahr EQ t_bkpf_p-gjahr
 AND hkont EQ skb1-saknr.
ENDIF.

Performance issue with BW Extractor 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H

Hi There,
We have a serious performance issue with BW extractor 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H in CRM . We recently applied SAP Note: 1330249 to optimise the performance, Even after applying the note it remains slow, Please can any one update the solution if they had same issue with this Extractor or know about this issue.
Thanks,
R

Hi Ramesh,
There are some instructions available in note 1330249 that shoul help you.
I don't know what is the current release in the system, but there are corrections to be implemented by Tcode SNOTE and also manual steps(in table SMOFPARSFA).
I hope it contributes.
Regards,
Sinara Moraes

Performance Issue with SXMB_MONI

Hi All,
I have a typical performance issue with SXMB_MONI, when I trigger this T.code it is taking around 20-24 hrs to execute.
Here I have found some tables which actually stores these processed xml messages,
SXMSPFADDRESS
SXMSPFRAWH
RSXMB_REMOTE_SERVICE
SXMSPFAGG
SXMSCONFVL
SXMSPMAST
SXMSPEMAS, SXMSPERROR, SXMSPMAST & SXMSPVERS.
SXMSPMAST, SXMSPMAST2, SXMSCLUR, SXMSCLUR2,
SXMSCLUP, SMXSLUP2, SXMSPFRAWH,
Here I want to increase the performance of sxmb_moni, firstly I want to know from which tables does the sxmb_moni fetches data and more over is it a single table or multiple table.
And please suggest any technique which can decrease the latency time in executing sxmb_moni.
Regards,
Vijay N

Hi,
Periodically you need to archive the XI messages, that allows you to maintain sufficient performance level.
Create archive jobs in SXMB_ADM to archive data which is 15 days old from XI related growing tables like SXMSCLUR, SXMSPEMAS, SXMSPHIST, SXMSPMAST, SXMSPVERS, SXMSPFRAW ,SWWWIHEAD. This archive job created archive files at the OS Level
For XI tables refer
/people/gourav.khare2/blog/2007/12/12/interesting-abap-tables-in-xi-150-part-i
SXMSPMAST, SXMSCLUP, SXMSPCLUR
the last two are cluster tables
and you won't get XML messages directly from them
have a look inside them
The classes that reads this information in SXMB_MONI are abap classes,
(can be seen at SE24) it is quite difficult to use them,
you might debug SXMB_MONI or use SE30 and see all the classes
that have been used.
You can use value mapping if you are not looking at picking up values from application system.It is just like SM30 transcation.You can get the info under SAP XI->Design and Configuration->Configuration->Value Mapping.
Also see the
these tables,
/SAPDMC/LSOMAP Field Mapping
/SAPTRX/SCAOTMAP
/SAPTRX/SCCNDMAP /SAPTRX/SCEVTMAP
/SAPTRX/SCFUNMAP /SAPTRX/SCSOMAP
/people/udo.martens/blog/2006/02/16/own-logging-of-xi-messages
message-mappings: stored in which database-table?
sxmb_moni, table sxmspmast, Messages with ICON_LED_RED, report RSXMB_SELECT
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/44/a1b46c4c686341e10000000a114a6b/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ef/45393c3eb3036be10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Thanks
Swarup

Performance issue with transaction MC50

I am not sure where to post this question. If I need to post it in another forum, please let me know.
We are having performance issues with transaction MC50. After reviewing SAP Note 457615 we created an index on mseg with the following fields: MANDT, MJAHR, MATNR, WERKS and SOBKZ.
When running an explain on the sql statement, the database is using a different index. This index has the following fields MANDT, MATNR, WERKS, LGORT, BWART and SOBKZ.
The sql statement is ( sql trace from ST05):
SELECT * from mseg WHERE "MANDT" = '400' AND "MJAHR" BETWEEN 2009 AND 2009 AND "MATNR" = '000000000054001121' AND "WERKS" = 'SAT' AND "SOBKZ" IN ( 'K' , 'V' , 'W' , 'O' , ' ' )
Is there any way to force the database to use the newly created index.
Thanks....Tommy
Edited by: Tommy Knight on Dec 8, 2009 2:24 PM
Edited by: Tommy Knight on Dec 8, 2009 3:07 PM
Edited by: Tommy Knight on Dec 8, 2009 3:08 PM

Hello Tommy,
at first your database release and patchset is missing.
If you are using Oracle 10g, the advice of Peter is useless, because of statistics are automatically collected by a CREATE INDEX.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_5010.htm#i2075657
COMPUTE STATISTICS
In earlier releases, you could use this clause to start or stop the collection of statistics on an index. This clause has been deprecated. Oracle Database now automatically collects statistics during index creation and rebuild. This clause is supported for backward compatibility and will not cause errors.
The other thing is - are you really sure that this SQL statements was executed with literals?
I know that on MSEG (with histograms) it is recommended sometimes, but i just want to be sure.
If you want us to help you - we need much more information .. please check sapnote #1257075 and upload the information to a webhosting platform, so that we can take a look at it.
Regards
Stefan

Is there a recommended limit on the number of custom sections and the cells per table so that there are no performance issues with the UI?

Is there a recommended limit on the number of custom sections and the cells per table so that there are no performance issues with the UI?

Thanks Kelly,
The answers would be the following:
1200 cells per custom section (NEW COUNT), and up to 30 custom sections per spec.
Assuming all will be populated, and this would apply to all final material specs in the system which could be ~25% of all material specs.
The cells will be numeric, free text, drop downs, and some calculated numeric.
Are we reaching the limits for UI performance?
Thanks

Performance issues with pipelined table functions

I am testing pipelined table functions to be able to re-use the base_query function. Contrary to my understanding, the with_pipeline procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy no_pipeline procedure. Am I missing something? The processor function is from [url http://www.oracle-developer.net/display.php?id=429]improving performance with pipelined table functions .
Edit: The underlying query returns 500,000 rows in about 3 minutes. So there are are no performance issues with the query itself.
Many thanks in advance.
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE pipeline_example
IS
 TYPE resultset_typ IS REF CURSOR;
 TYPE row_typ IS RECORD (colC VARCHAR2(200), colD VARCHAR2(200), colE VARCHAR2(200));
 TYPE table_typ IS TABLE OF row_typ;
 FUNCTION base_query (argA IN VARCHAR2, argB IN VARCHAR2)
 RETURN resultset_typ;
 c_default_limit CONSTANT PLS_INTEGER := 100;
 FUNCTION processor (
 p_source_data IN resultset_typ,
 p_limit_size IN PLS_INTEGER DEFAULT c_default_limit)
 RETURN table_typ
 PIPELINED
 PARALLEL_ENABLE(PARTITION p_source_data BY ANY);
 PROCEDURE with_pipeline (argA IN VARCHAR2,
 argB IN VARCHAR2,
 o_resultset OUT resultset_typ);
 PROCEDURE no_pipeline (argA IN VARCHAR2,
 argB IN VARCHAR2,
 o_resultset OUT resultset_typ);
END pipeline_example;
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY pipeline_example
IS
 FUNCTION base_query (argA IN VARCHAR2, argB IN VARCHAR2)
 RETURN resultset_typ
 IS
 o_resultset resultset_typ;
 BEGIN
 OPEN o_resultset FOR
 SELECT colC, colD, colE
 FROM some_table
 WHERE colA = ArgA AND colB = argB;
 RETURN o_resultset;
 END base_query;
 FUNCTION processor (
 p_source_data IN resultset_typ,
 p_limit_size IN PLS_INTEGER DEFAULT c_default_limit)
 RETURN table_typ
 PIPELINED
 PARALLEL_ENABLE(PARTITION p_source_data BY ANY)
 IS
 aa_source_data table_typ;-- := table_typ ();
 BEGIN
 LOOP
 FETCH p_source_data
 BULK COLLECT INTO aa_source_data
 LIMIT p_limit_size;
 EXIT WHEN aa_source_data.COUNT = 0;
 /* Process the batch of (p_limit_size) records... */
 FOR i IN 1 .. aa_source_data.COUNT
 LOOP
 PIPE ROW (aa_source_data (i));
 END LOOP;
 END LOOP;
 CLOSE p_source_data;
 RETURN;
 END processor;
 PROCEDURE with_pipeline (argA IN VARCHAR2,
 argB IN VARCHAR2,
 o_resultset OUT resultset_typ)
 IS
 BEGIN
 OPEN o_resultset FOR
 SELECT /*+ PARALLEL(t, 5) */ colC,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD > colE AND colE != '0' THEN colD / ColE END)de,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colE > colD AND colD != '0' THEN colE / ColD END)ed,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD = colE AND colD != '0' THEN '1' END) de_one,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD = '0' OR colE = '0' THEN '0' END) de_zero
 FROM TABLE (processor (base_query (argA, argB),100)) t
 GROUP BY colC
 ORDER BY colC
 END with_pipeline;
 PROCEDURE no_pipeline (argA IN VARCHAR2,
 argB IN VARCHAR2,
 o_resultset OUT resultset_typ)
 IS
 BEGIN
 OPEN o_resultset FOR
 SELECT colC,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD > colE AND colE != '0' THEN colD / ColE END)de,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colE > colD AND colD != '0' THEN colE / ColD END)ed,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD = colE AND colD != '0' THEN 1 END) de_one,
 SUM (CASE WHEN colD = '0' OR colE = '0' THEN '0' END) de_zero
 FROM (SELECT colC, colD, colE
 FROM some_table
 WHERE colA = ArgA AND colB = argB)
 GROUP BY colC
 ORDER BY colC;
 END no_pipeline;
END pipeline_example;
ALTER PACKAGE pipeline_example COMPILE;Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 14, 2010 9:47 AM
Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 14, 2010 11:31 AM
Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 14, 2010 11:32 AM
Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 20, 2010 12:04 PM
Edited by: Earthlink on Nov 20, 2010 12:54 PM

Earthlink wrote:
Contrary to my understanding, the with_pipeline procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy no_pipeline procedure. Am I missing something? Well, we're missing a lot here.
Like:
- a database version
- how did you test
- what data do you have, how is it distributed, indexed
and so on.
If you want to find out what's going on then use a TRACE with wait events.
All nessecary steps are explained in these threads:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
Another nice one is RUNSTATS:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/ASKTOM.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701

Performance issues with Homesharing?

I have a Time Capsule as the base station for my wireless network, then 2 Airport Express setup to extend the network around the house, an iMac i7 as the main iTunes Library and couple of iPads, and a couple of Apple TVs. Everything has the latest software, but I have several performance issues with Home sharing. I've done several tests making sure nothing is taking additional bandwidth, so here are the list of issues:
1) With nothing else running, trying playing a movie via home sharing in an iPad 2 which is located on my iMac, it stops and I have to keep pressing the play button over and over again. I typically see that the iPad tries to download part of the movie first and then starts playing so that it deals with the bandwidth, but in many cases it doesn't.
2) When trying to play any iTunes content (movies, music, photos, etc) from my Apple TV I can see my computer library, but when I go in on any of the menus, it says there's no content. I have to reboot the Apple TV and then problem fixed. I's just annoying that I have to reboot.
3) When watching a Netflix movie on my iPad and with Airplay I send the sound to some speakers via Airplay through an Airport Express. At time I lose the connection to the speakers.
I've complained about Wifi's instability, but here I tried to keep everything with Apples products to avoid any compatibility issues and stay within N wireless technology, which I understood it was much more stable.
Has anyone some suggestions?

Hi,
you should analyze the db after you have loaded the tables.
Do you use sequences to generate PKs? Do you have a lot of indexex and/or triggers on the tables?
If yes:
make sure your sequence caches (alter sequence s cache 10000)
Drop all unneeded indexes while loading and disable trigger if possible.
How big is your Redo Log Buffer? When loading a large amount of data it may be an option to enlarge this buffer.
Do you have more then one DBWR Process? Writing parallel can speed up things when a checkpoint is needed.
Is it possible using a direct load? Or do you already direct load?
Dim

Performance issues with the Vouchers index build in SES

Hi All,
We are currently performing an upgrade for: PS FSCM 9.1 to PS FSCM 9.2.
As a part of the upgrade, Client wants Oracle SES to be deployed for some modules including, Purchasing, Payables (Vouchers)
We are facing severe performance issues with the Vouchers index build. (Volume of data = approx. 8.5 million rows of data)
The index creation process runs for over 5 days.
Can you please share any information or issues that you may have faced on your project and how they were addressed?

Check the following logs for errors:
1. The message log from the process scheduler
2. search_server1-diagnostic.log in /search_server1/logs directory
If the build is getting stuck while crawling then we typically have to increase the Java Heap size for the Weblogic instance for SES>

Performance issues with SAP BPC 7.0/7.5 (SP06, 07, 08) NW

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for