Performance problem on view with spatial column - resolved

I have had a problem with queries on a view that had a spatial column, where the view did not belong to the logged in user. Where my spatial window was retrieved by a sub-query, the spatial scan did a full table scan instead of using the spatial index.
I have found that the problem can be resolved by granting MERGE VIEW on the view to the querying user.
The view can be as simple as SELECT * FROM table.
The badly performing query could be as simple as
select id from T1.tstview
where SDO_RELATE(coordinates,
(SELECT coordinates FROM T1.tstWINDOW WHERE ID = '1')
,'mask=INSIDE+COVEREDBY querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE' ;
I think this is a bug, and have raised an SR - MERGE VIEW is supposed to override issues with the "security intent" of a view.
The workaround is simple enough once you're aware of it and I thought it was worth passing on.

Thanks for sharing this workaround!
Which ORACLE version did you test ?

Similar Messages

Replicate Table with spatial columns

I'd like to know how to
replicate (updatable snapshot) a table
with spatial columns.
when i try to create a master repobject
i've got ORA-23318 error.
What can i do?
null

Hi Vincent,
Oracle does not support replication of object in 8.1.6 or 8.1.7. I believe replication support is expected for the version after.
Sorry,
Dan

Create materialized view with specific column sizes

Hi all,
I'm trying to create a materialized view with a specific a column size. Something like
create materialized view test_mv
refresh force on demand
as
select id,
       cast(my_compound_field as nvarchar2(50))
from ( select id,
              field1 || field2 my_compound_field
       from   my_table);But Oracle seems to ignore the cast and takes the maximum size it finds for field1 || field2 in the select query. The resulting table has a column nvarchar2(44) instead of nvarchar2(50).
This can give a problem when the view is refreshed... there could be new data that exceeds the current size, i.e. where length(field1 || field2) > 44.
How can I override the column size of a field in a materialized view?
Edit: Some additional info to clarify my case:
field1 and field2 are defined as nvarchar2(25). field1 || field2 can theoretically have a length of 50, but there is currently no data in my table that results in that length, the max is 44. I am afraid that there will be data in the future that exceeds 44, resulting in an error when the MV is refreshed!
Edited by: Pleiadian on Jan 25, 2011 2:06 PM

Cannot reproduce what you are saying is happening.
SQL> create table t (a nvarchar2(50), b nvarchar2(50));
Table created.
SQL> create materialized view tmv as
2 select a, b, a || b c from t;
Materialized view created.
SQL> desc tmv
Name                                      Null?    Type
A                                                  NVARCHAR2(50)
B                                                  NVARCHAR2(50)
C                                                  NVARCHAR2(100)
SQL> drop materialized view tmv;
Materialized view dropped.
SQL> create materialized view tmv as
2 select a, b, substr(a || b, 1, 10) c from t;
Materialized view created.
SQL> desc tmv
Name                                      Null?    Type
A                                                  NVARCHAR2(50)
B                                                  NVARCHAR2(50)
C                                                  NVARCHAR2(10)
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
CORE    11.1.0.7.0      Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
SQL>Edited by: 3360 on Jan 25, 2011 8:10 AM
And with data
SQL> insert into t values ('3123423423143hhshgvcdcvw', 'ydgeew gdfwe   dfefde wfjjjjjjj');
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> desc tmv
Name                                      Null?    Type
A                                                  NVARCHAR2(50)
B                                                  NVARCHAR2(50)
C                                                  NVARCHAR2(10)
SQL> select * from tmv;
A
B                                                  C
3123423423143hhshgvcdcvw
ydgeew gdfwe   dfefde wfjjjjjjj                      3123423423

How To Create Table View With Same Column name But Different Table?

Hi All,
I have the problem to create a tableview with same column name but in different table.
The Table that i have:-
Table - PAC051MPROFORMA
Column - mrn,visitid
Table - PAC051TPROFORMA
Column - mrn,visitid
Table - PAC052MTRANSBILL
Column - mrn,visitid
Then i want to create a table view to view that table. This is my SQL
CREATE VIEW pacviewproforma (mrn,visitid,mrn,visitid,mrn,visitid)
As Select PAC051MPROFORMA.mrn,PAC051MPROFORMA.visitid,PAC051TPROFORMA.mrn,PAC051TPROFORMA.visitid,PAC052MTRANSBILL.mrn,PAC052MTRANSBILL.visitid
where
*(a.PAC051MPROFORMA.mrn=PAC051TPROFORMA.mrn)*
and
*(a.PAC051TPROFORMA.mrn=PAC052TRANSBILL.mrn)*
That SQL Return this error = ORA-00957: duplicate column name
Then I modify that SQL to
CREATE VIEW pacviewproforma (mrn,visitid)
As Select PAC051MPROFORMA.mrn,PAC051MPROFORMA.visitid,PAC051TPROFORMA.mrn,PAC051TPROFORMA.visitid,PAC052MTRANSBILL.mrn,PAC052MTRANSBILL.visitid
where
*(a.PAC051MPROFORMA.mrn=PAC051TPROFORMA.mrn)*
and
*(a.PAC051TPROFORMA.mrn=PAC052TRANSBILL.mrn)*
This time this error return = ORA-01730: invalid number of column names specified
What should i do?
Thanks...

Hi,
SQL> CREATE VIEW pacviewproforma (mrn,visitid,mrn,visitid,mrn,visitid)
2 As Select
3 PAC051MPROFORMA.mrn,
4 PAC051MPROFORMA.visitid,
5 PAC051TPROFORMA.mrn,
6 PAC051TPROFORMA.visitid,
7 PAC052MTRANSBILL.mrn,
8 PAC052MTRANSBILL.visitid
9 from PAC051MPROFORMA,PAC051TPROFORMA,PAC052MTRANSBILL
10 where
11 (PAC051MPROFORMA.mrn=PAC051TPROFORMA.mrn)
12 and
13 (PAC051TPROFORMA.mrn=PAC052MTRANSBILL.mrn);
CREATE VIEW pacviewproforma (mrn,visitid,mrn,visitid,mrn,visitid)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00957: duplicate column namePlease give different names to each column.
Something like this..
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW pacviewproforma (MPROFORMA_mrn,MPROFORMA_visitid,TPROFORMA_mrn,TPROFORMA
_visitid,MTRANSBILL_mrn,MTRANSBILL_visitid)
2 As Select
3 PAC051MPROFORMA.mrn,
4 PAC051MPROFORMA.visitid,
5 PAC051TPROFORMA.mrn,
6 PAC051TPROFORMA.visitid,
7 PAC052MTRANSBILL.mrn,
8 PAC052MTRANSBILL.visitid
9 from PAC051MPROFORMA,PAC051TPROFORMA,PAC052MTRANSBILL
10 where
11 (PAC051MPROFORMA.mrn=PAC051TPROFORMA.mrn)
12 and
13 (PAC051TPROFORMA.mrn=PAC052MTRANSBILL.mrn);
View created.
SQL> DESC pacviewproforma;
Name                                      Null?    Type
MPROFORMA_MRN                                      NUMBER
MPROFORMA_VISITID                                  NUMBER
TPROFORMA_MRN                                      NUMBER
TPROFORMA_VISITID                                  NUMBER
MTRANSBILL_MRN                                     NUMBER
MTRANSBILL_VISITID                                 NUMBER
ORA-01730: invalid number of column names specifiedThe list of column nmae you specified during the CREATE VIEW should match with the SELECT list of the view.
Twinkle

View with renamed column does not use index

Is there any reason why a view that renames the columns presented to the users would ignore an index?
For example:
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW ENROLLMENT
(ENROLLMENT_ID, ENROLLMENT_DATE, FIRST_NAME)
AS
select distinct
a.col1 as enrollment_id,
a.col2 as enrollment_date,
a.col3 as first_name
from t1 a
When a user queries the view, with a WHERE FIRST_NAME = 'TOM", it results in a FTS. However, if you run the query against the base table (using col1, col2, and col3), it uses the index against t1 on (col3, col2, col1).

Well, I tried to create the supporting evidence afterwards (sigh, why do I keep doing that ...), it seems that Oracle has addressed this problem already:
SQL> create table t1
2 as
3 select l col1, sysdate - l/86400 col2, decode(l,1,'TOM',to_char(l)) col3
4    from (select level l from dual connect by level <= 100000)
5 /
Tabel is aangemaakt.
SQL> create index i1 on t1 (col3, col2, col1)
2 /
Index is aangemaakt.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'T1',method_opt=>'FOR ALL INDEXED COLUMNS')
PL/SQL-procedure is geslaagd.
SQL> create view enrollment
2 (enrollment_id, enrollment_date, first_name)
3 as
4 select distinct
5 a.col1 as enrollment_id,
6 a.col2 as enrollment_date,
7 a.col3 as first_name
8 from t1 a
9 /
View is aangemaakt.
SQL> set autotrace on explain
SQL> select * from enrollment where first_name = 'TOM'
2 /
                         ENROLLMENT_ID ENROLLMENT_DATE     FIRST_NAME
                                     1 16-01-2007 14:41:25 TOM
1 rij is geselecteerd.
Uitvoeringspan
   0      SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=3 Card=1 Bytes=44)
   1    0   VIEW OF 'ENROLLMENT' (Cost=3 Card=1 Bytes=44)
   2    1     SORT (UNIQUE NOSORT) (Cost=3 Card=1 Bytes=18)
   3    2       INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'I1' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=3 Card=1
           Bytes=18)I'm on 9.2.0.7.0 here, what's your version ?
Regards,
Rob.

Problem by adding one spatial column to the version-enabled table

Hello, I'm trying to modify one version-enabled table T1 like this:
--table definition
create table T1
(ID NUMBER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
NAME VARCHAR2 (256),
FUNCTION VARCHAR2 (256));
--enable versioning
EXECUTE DBMS_WM.EnableVersioning('T1','VIEW_WO_OVERWRITE');
I'd like to add one spatial column to this table by:
-- modify metada view for spatial indexing
INSERT INTO USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA (TABLE_NAME, COLUMN_NAME, DIMINFO, SRID)
VALUES ('T1_LT', 'ANCHOR',
MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ARRAY
(MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('X', 0.000, 100000.000, 0.0005),
MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Y', 0.000, 100000.000, 0.0005),
MDSYS.SDO_DIM_ELEMENT('Z', -100, 1000, 0.0005)) , 81989002);
-- table modification - add a column and create a spatial index
EXECUTE DBMS_WM.BeginDDL('T1');
ALTER TABLE T1_LTS ADD ("ANCHOR" MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY);
CREATE INDEX T1_SPX on T1_LTS(ANCHOR) INDEXTYPE is MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX;
EXECUTE DBMS_WM.CommitDDL('T1');
By finishing of the DDL operation with EXECUTE DBMS_WM.CommitDDL('T1') I get an error message:
"SQL> EXECUTE DBMS_WM.CommitDDL('T1');
BEGIN DBMS_WM.CommitDDL('T1'); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-20171: WM error: 'CREATE TABLE' and 'CREATE SEQUENCE' privileges needed.
ORA-06512: at "SYS.WM_ERROR", line 342
ORA-06512: at "SYS.WM_ERROR", line 359
ORA-06512: at "SYS.LTUTIL", line 8016
ORA-06512: at "SYS.LT", line 11925
ORA-06512: at line 1
What is wrong here? The Oracle 10g DB is installed on Windows 2003 Server, OWM_VERSION - 10.2.0.1.0.
Regards,
Viktor

Hi,
You need to explicitly grant the create table and create sequence privileges to the user owning the table. It is not enough for these to be granted by using a role. This restriction is documented in the user guide.
Also, you should add the entry in the user_sdo_geom_metadata view on the t1_lts table, which is the table to which you are actually adding the geometry column, after calling beginDDL. CommitDDL will make the necessary changes, which in this case would be to add an entry for both t1 and t1_lt.
Regards,
Ben

HANA Studio rev.74 - performance in calc view with union of many sources

Hi,
Windows 7 32 bit, 4GB system memory, Intel Core Duo 2.26Ghz, HANA studio rev 74.
Maintaining a graphical calculation view where first node is union of 30 calculation views each with 150 columns. Maintenance of the view is terribly slow almost to the point of unusable as I add sources to the union, leading to a consideration of remodelling the requirement with a scripted view (or breaking down into smaller sets of graphical calculation views) to work around the sluggish response.
As well as building the view for development purposes I'm considering longer term maintenance options where I cannot guarantee system specs of the supporting developer.
Does anyone else have experience of such sluggish Studio performance with a graphical calculation view using many large view sources?
Is there any theoretical limit to the number of sources in a union?
Cheers,
JP.

Hi Jon-Paul,
sorry for going off topic, but...
if there's still an issue with the appliance (on CAL?), doesn't it flow over to the client? i have the client SP80 installed, but until i get the confirmation that the server i'm connecting to is 'production' ready i can't really take the full advantage of the upgraded client as i don't see any significant point of using client 80 with server 74, but it sounds like you would want to make it work, nevertheless.
to me, yellow is still yellow even though it doesn't really stand for anything.
good luck and let us know your test results,
greg

Problem updating view with triggers

I created a view with instead-of triggers for updating. When I try to update the view with an ADO 2.7 recordset I receive errormessages.
rsAns.CursorLocation = adUseServer
rsAns.Open "select * from callcenter.v_ans where kidno = 1534", adoConn, adOpenKeyset, adLockOptimistic
rsAns.fields("Name").value = "Thomas"
The last line creates the error:
-2147217888
Consumer's event handler called a non-reentrant method in the provider.
When I try the same lines of code with...
rsAns.CursorLocation = adUseClient
I get:
-2147217887
Multiple-step operation generated errors. Check each status value.
By the way, when using client side cursors with Microsoft's OLE DB for Oracle it works fine.
Any ideas?

I had the same problem but without triggers. I only changed some values in different records (always automatically commited) and after the third change I got this error message. At the same time I was connected with TOAD to the databse and there was no problem to change the data - so it doesn't look like a database problem.
UPDATE "BLATABLE"."KEYS" SET "BLAVALUE" = "abcdef" WHERE ROWID = 'AAA2c1AADAAAHa5AAH' AND ORA_ROWSCN = '7738949481842'
One error saving changes to table "BLATABLE"."KEYS":
Row 6: ORA-01000: maximum open cursors exceeded

How to create a view with a column of counts of the occurence of values

If my table is:
ID
1
2
3
3
5
5
5
I want to create a view with the following result:
ID   COUNT
1     1
2     1
3     2
5     3
How would I accomplish this?

Sorry, my mistake. I was thinking about counting distinct events.
I created a table with your example values:
You should do a projection with a calculated column = 1:
And then add this calculated column as an aggregated measure on the aggregation node:
Result:
Cheers,
Fernando

Materialized view with selected columns on target

Hi,
I want to create a materialized view fast refresh with only selected columns on the target database like for example, i'm having a table ABC with 10 columns on the source database, i've table XYZ with 25 columns on the target database. I want to refresh only 20 columns of XYZ table with 20 columns of the ABC table.
Is this possible?
If yes, could you please share information or any weblinks or metalink notes.
Thanks,

The documentation is located at http://tahiti.oracle.com.
I would give you the answer but, quite frankly, this is such a basic docs question you really need to read this yourself.
If, after reading the docs, you still have a question post the link to the document you read and explain what about the document is causing confusion.
And to be perfectly clear about my feelings ... when I taught Oracle at university ... if one of my students had asked that question my response would have been ... "Did you try it?"
And "No" would not be an acceptable answer.

Cluster table with Spatial column

Hi,
I tried to create a spatial table(with one SDO_GEOMETRY column) with cluster on one attribute column. But I keep getting error ORA-03001: unimplemented feature.
Is this mean that I can not cluster a table with SDO_GEOMETRY column?
Thanks
Helen

Hi Helen,
The parameter you mention is only for real application clusters, not for clustering columns of tables.
As far as I can tell, when clustering columns of different tables together Oracle will try to
store all of the data associated with those tables together on disk.
The Oracle Spatial geometry datatype (mdsys.sdo_geometry) includes two varray types of
length 1048576. Because these varrays can hold so much data Oracle "makes arraingements"
to store data in these columns outside of the table in a lob segment (in reality, data is only
stored out-of-line if there is over 4kb of data in the varray).
Because of this (no ability to ensure the spatial data is stored with the clustering columns),
the clustering mechnism is disabled when you have spatial data.
I read through the doc and it is unclear - the only restriction I could find is using these columns
as the clustering key.
Hope this helps,
Dan

Performance of large tables with ADT columns

Hello,
We are planning to build a large table ( 1 billion+ rows) with one of the columns being an Advanced Data Type (ADT) column. The ADT column will be based on a TYPE that will have approximately (250 attributes).
We are using Oracle 10g R2
Can you please tell me the following:
1. How will Oracle store the data in the ADT column?
2. Will the entire ADT record fit in one block?
3. Is it still possible to partition a table on an attribute that is part of the ADT?
4. How will the performace be affected if Oracle does a full table scan of such a table?
5. How much space will Oracle take, if any, for storing a NULL in an ADT?
I think we can create indexes on the attribute of the ADT column. Please let me know if this is not true.
Thanks for your help.

I agree with D.Morgan that object type with 250 attributes is doubtful.
I don't like object tables (tables with "row objects") too.
But, your table is a relational table with object column ("column object").
C.J.Date in An introduction to Database Systems (2004, page 885) says:
"... object/relational systems ... are, or should be, basically just relational systems
that support the relational domain concept (i.e., types) properly - in other words, true relational systems,
meaning in particular systems that allow users to define their own types."
1. How will Oracle store the data in the ADT column?...
For some answers see:
“OR(DBMS) or R(DBMS), That is the Question”
http://www.quest-pipelines.com/pipelines/plsql/tips.htm#OCTOBER
and (of course):
"Oracle® Database Application Developer's Guide - Object-Relational Features" 10g Release 2 (10.2)
http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14260/adobjadv.htm#i1006903
Regards,
Zlatko

Create edit form based on view with multiple column key

Hi
I have a requirement to create a form to update some tables columns based on a view.
The problem is that the view has a primary key of 4 columns.
I have tried to create a rowid key based on one underlying table but this does not work.
I am calling the form from an interactive report but can only pass 3 keys to the form, so only get 3 fields populated.
Is there some way i can create the form manually as the wizards cannot cope with this requirement?
My view is here:
CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW "DMOADMIN"."MO_STATUS_LOG_VIEW" ("MONEY_ORD_NO", "STATUS_CODE", "DESCRIP", "STATUS_DATE_TIME", "TXN_DATE_TIME", "LLOG_ID", "LINE_SEQ_NO", "CANCEL_IND", "PROCESS_ID", "PBU_ID", "TXN_SEQ_NO", "CANCEL_REASON", "CONDITION_ID", "ADMIN_DATE_TIME", "ADMIN_LLOG_ID") AS
SELECT a.money_ord_no,
b.status_code,
b.descrip,
a.status_date_time,
c.txn_date_time,
c.llog_id,
c.line_seq_no,
c.cancel_ind,
c.process_id,
c.pbu_id,
c.txn_seq_no,
c.cancel_reason,
c.condition_id,
d.txn_date_time admin_date_time,
d.llog_id admin_llog_id
FROM mo_status a,
mo_status_desc b,
host_txn_log c,
host_admin_log d
WHERE a.status_desc_id = b.id
AND a.money_ord_no = c.money_ord_no(+)
AND a.status_date_time = c.txn_date_time(+)
AND a.money_ord_no = d.money_ord_no(+)
AND a.status_date_time = d.txn_date_time(+)
WITH CHECK OPTION;
I have tried to populate the data using with an on load process using a plsql query but it is not working. I get no data found error message. Help!

Hi Erwin,
I have a similar situation.
Tabular form based on a view. The view contains a table in a another instance via dblink and everything works fine.
The only one difference between my and your view is that my "instead of" view is only for UPDATE. You must to have "intead of" trigger only for UPDATE. Insert and delete works fine withoust "instead of" trigger.
So, try to delete INSERT and DELETE words from your "INSTEADOFBUBA" trigger.
hope it helps,
Mzz

Creation of view with clob column in select and group by clause.

Hi,
We are trying to migrate a view from sql server2005 to oracle 10g. It has clob column which is used in group by clause. How can the same be achived in oracle 10g.
Below is the sql statament used in creating view aling with its datatypes.
CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW "TEST" ("CONTENT_ID", "TITLE", "KEYWORDS", "CONTENT", "ISPOPUP", "CREATED", "SEARCHSTARTDATE", "SEARCHENDDATE", "HITS", "TYPE", "CREATEDBY", "UPDATED", "ISDISPLAYED", "UPDATEDBY", "AVERAGERATING", "VOTES") AS
SELECT content_ec.content_id,
          content_ec.title,
          content_ec.keywords,
          content_ec.content content ,
          content_ec.ispopup,
          content_ec.created,
          content_ec.searchstartdate,
          content_ec.searchenddate,
        COUNT(contenttracker_ec.contenttracker_id) hits,
          contenttypes_ec.type,
          users_ec_1.username createdby,
          Backup_Latest.created updated,
          Backup_Latest.isdisplayed,
          users_ec_1.username updatedby,
          guideratings.averagerating,
          guideratings.votes
     FROM users_ec users_ec_1
            JOIN Backup_Latest
             ON users_ec_1.USER_ID = Backup_Latest.USER_ID
            RIGHT JOIN content_ec
            JOIN contenttypes_ec
             ON content_ec.contenttype_id = contenttypes_ec.contenttype_id
             ON Backup_Latest.content_id = content_ec.content_id
            LEFT JOIN guideratings
             ON content_ec.content_id = guideratings.content_id
            LEFT JOIN contenttracker_ec
             ON content_ec.content_id = contenttracker_ec.content_id
            LEFT JOIN users_ec users_ec_2
             ON content_ec.user_id = users_ec_2.USER_ID
     GROUP BY content_ec.content_id,
     content_ec.title,
     content_ec.keywords,
     to_char(content_ec.content) ,
     content_ec.ispopup,
     content_ec.created,
     content_ec.searchstartdate,
     content_ec.searchenddate,
     contenttypes_ec.type,
     users_ec_1.username,
     Backup_Latest.created,
     Backup_Latest.isdisplayed,
     users_ec_1.username,
     guideratings.averagerating,
     guideratings.votes;
Column Name      Data TYpe
CONTENT_ID     NUMBER(10,0)
TITLE          VARCHAR2(50)
KEYWORDS     VARCHAR2(100)
CONTENT          CLOB
ISPOPUP          NUMBER(1,0)
CREATED          TIMESTAMP(6)
SEARCHSTARTDATE     TIMESTAMP(6)
SEARCHENDDATE     TIMESTAMP(6)
HITS          NUMBER
TYPE          VARCHAR2(50)
CREATEDBY     VARCHAR2(20)
UPDATED          TIMESTAMP(6)
ISDISPLAYED     NUMBER(1,0)
UPDATEDBY     VARCHAR2(20)
AVERAGERATING     NUMBER
VOTES          NUMBERAny help realyy appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Edited by: user512743 on Dec 10, 2008 10:46 PM

Hello,
Specifically, this should be asked in the
ASP.Net MVC forum on forums.asp.net.
Karl
When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer.
My Blog: Unlock PowerShell
My Book: Windows PowerShell 2.0 Bible
My E-mail: -join ('6F6C646B61726C40686F746D61696C2E636F6D'-split'(?<=\G.{2})'|%{if($_){[char][int]"0x$_"}})

Problem in views with heirarchies

Hi Gurus
I have a problem with the views. I have created a variable on a hierarchy. I ran the query with drill down at level 3 on hierarchy and saved the view. Now second time when I run the same query with drill down at level 2 the view is not getting updated at that level. I am doing any mistake.
How this can be achieved. Could any one help me out.

Hi Gurus
I have a problem with the views. I have created a variable on a hierarchy. I ran the query with drill down at level 3 on hierarchy and saved the view. Now second time when I run the same query with drill down at level 2 the view is not getting updated at that level. I am doing any mistake.
How this can be achieved. Could any one help me out.

Performance problem on view with spatial column - resolved

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for