Picture color profile in Lightroom vs Photoshop CS2 editing

Hi all, I hope someone can solve this for me.
When I'm viewing picture in Light room, all my pictures are a bit warmer ( have a yellowish tint to them ) compared to when I view them in Photoshop CS2. The same is true if I view them in other programs. This is true for all my picture file type (jpg, tif or raw). I get the feeling that it's Light room that in the wrong in how it displays the picture and not the other programs. Using the warms tool to make the picture a bit colder, only adds a bluish tint to the image which isn't even close to what it looks like (unedited) in Photoshop.
I get the feeling that Lightroom does something to the picture, or uses some sort of color profile, driver that other programs don't use.
Is there a way of changing this?

>When I purchase these ADOBE products I expect them to JUST WORK!!!!!
Unfortunately, when Microsoft, Dell and others enter the fray it's no longer up to just the Adobe folks. Differences between Photoshop and Lightroom are almost always due to a corrupt monitor profile. Adobe has nothing to do with that.
>I dont wanna have to be worried about corrupt profiles yada yada yada!!!
I just want to be able to do my color correction and exposure corrections in Lightroom export as a High Res Jpeg and then do the remainder of my work in Photoshop and have them both look the same.
If your screen is correctly calibrated that will be the case. Unfortunately if you want to do color sensitive work on a computer with a typical monitor, you have to have a rudimentary understanding of profiles and color management. There is unfortunately no way around it. This is no different from traditional color photography where you have to understand what different film, different filters and different development do to your colors. The terminology is just different.
>How do I fix this and please go through it STEP BY STEP BY STEP!!!!
I am not one for the computer lingo....
OK. I'll assume first that you have no hardware calibrator and that you are on windows:
1. Make sure your Photoshop color settings are set up to respect embedded profiles. See the
first screenshot in this post(ignore everything else as it is no longer relevant in LR 2).
2. Open your monitor's properties panel, click on advanced and go to the color management tab. Delete any profile you see there. This is the culprit. Probably a bad profile got installed in some driver update for your graphics card or your monitor.
3. Restart Lightroom and Photoshop and that's it! You'll have corresponding colors. You are however, cheating yourself as your monitor is completely uncalibrated. This is how 99% of computer users run their monitors.
So here is what you should be doing if you care about your color and matching to print and making sure that others see the same colors. Even though hardly anybody calibrates, the only way to get a good average correspondence is to calibrate your monitor and use color managed apps. This sequence is valid for both macs and PCs
1. Do as above step one and make sure Photoshop is set up correctly and then go out and buy a hardware calibrator (or order online). They can be had for <$100 for pretty good ones. Look for example for Spyder2 and Huey Pro.
2. Calibrate your screen following the instructions from the software
3. Restart Lightroom and Photoshop. Now you'll have identical but correct color.
If you have a mac, you can cheat slightly and use http://www.computer-darkroom.com/colorsync-display/colorsync_1.htm instead of hardware calibration. You cannot expect very good correspondence between monitor and prints though with that method.

Similar Messages

  • Color profiling in Lightroom

    Hi,
    I send my photos to a lab for printing. Is there a way to use their color profiles in Lightroom or do I have to go back to Photoshop to do this? And, if I adjust the photo using the labs color profile in Photoshop will Lightroom recognize it?
    Thanks,
    j.

    You can "print" a color managed JPEG file out of Lightroom's print module and select any color profile on your system.(It's a handy way of utilizing the layout features in the print module while using your local lab) You can also select any color profile when exporting your file. The only place where color profiles are limited is the exchange between Lightroom and Photoshop. You can choose between the three most common color spaces at that point.
    One other quick point, Lightroom is completely color managed. If your file is tagged with a valid ICC profile the application will respect and manage all of those details for you.
    Regards,
    Tom

  • Color profiles in Lightroom 3 for online printing

    Hi,
    I would like to know if I can enter color profiles in Lightroom 3 for online printing. I am going to use Adormapix and they have color profiles for each paper. Is there a way to do this in LR 3 and if not is this available in LR 4 or 5? I plan to upgrade in the next 6 months but may upgrade sooner if I need to.

    Generally, profiles provided by labs are not for imbedding, or converting the image to send for on-line printing. They are used to simulate the final output on your screen so you have an idea what you will be getting back from the lab on that paper. This is called soft proofing. It is available in Lightroom 4 or 5 by hitting the [S] key while in the Develop module.  Choosing a profile in the Soft Proofing dialog that appears beneath the histogram is a way to see how your final print will approximately appear on a selected media.
    From Adorama's website: "We print in sRGB color space, so for best results convert your images before uploading." meaning that you will want to send Adorama sRGB images only. When you create a JPEG file to send to Adorama, you will want to specify sRGB in the Lightroom Export dialog under File Settings.

  • Changing color profile in Lightroom 5 Soft Proofing from ProPhotoRGB to sRGB is not showing any changes, changes in Photoshop CC are dramatic

    I am working with  the color profile ProPhoto RGB in both Lightroom 5 and Photoshop CC. In preparing for my first Blurb book I have tried to generate pictures in sRGB in Lightroom, using the Soft Proofing feature, but there are no changes at all. Then I transfer the same pictures into Photoshop, change the color profiles and the results are dramatically different.
    What can I do to achieve the same results in Lightroom

    With an average monitor what you see on-screen is already soft proofed to sRGB (or something very close to it), because that's all the monitor is capable of displaying anyway. So soft proofing to sRGB won't tell you anything. You won't see any difference.
    In Photoshop it sounds as if you assign profiles. That's not the way to do it. If you convert correctly you won't see any difference. Same principle as above: there may be clipping in the process, but what you see on screen is already clipped, so no visual on-screen difference.
    With a wide gamut monitor soft proofing becomes slightly more useful. But still you won't see any changes occurring outside Adobe RGB. You'll get a better idea by keeping an eye on the histogram. Ideally, all three channels should taper gently off towards the endpoints. If any one or two channels are backed solidly up against the endpoint, on either side, that's gamut clipping.
    If Blurb gave you a real profile, one that reflected their actual printing process, you could soft proof to that. But apparently they don't.

  • Problem with DNG Color Profiles in Lightroom 5.4

    Hello folks,
    I recently updated from LR 5.3 to Lightroom 5.4 and since then I am having problem when using dng color profiles which were created with Colorchecker Passport. Every time I use such a profile which was created for my Nikon D 800 I get very greenish tones in the pictures.
    I use Windows 7 Pro on a HP Z 210 Workstation. The monitor is a hardware-calibrated Quato which was recently calibrated.
    Does anyone have this problem too and - if yes - know how to fix it?
    Thanks!
    Yours, Albert
    PS: As English isn't my mother tongue I apologize for any mistakes in the text above.

    Hello Andrew,
    I do have a Nikon D 800 and a Fuji X-E1. I haven's noticed a problem with the Fuji so far. I think I will recalibrate my monitor tomorrow and see if the problem still exists.
    I can supply raws and DNG profiles but I don't know where I should upload them - I suggest I could do it on my own webspace. Would that be ok?

  • Color intensity in lightroom vs. photoshop

    hi,
    i love lightroom. i just recently purchased and use it for all my raw processing. i use a large format camera and a leaf valeo 22mp digital back. the color intensity in lightroom is amazing. when i export it to photoshop though to clean up spots and the like, i notice a less intense representation of the photo. is there a way to keep that wonderful intensity and contrast? monitor is calibrated every two weeks.

    Make sure that photoshop is setup to respect embedded profiles (Edit->Color Settings, make sure in color management policies all three popups show "respect embedded profiles). It sounds like you have the color management in PS set up incorrectly. LR and PS should look basically indistinguishable safe for some minor differences in how PS renders.

  • [Vista] No color profiles in Lightroom

    I have a problem with printing in lightroom.
    There are some more topics with printing problems, but not like mine.
    The problem is that i would like Lightroom to manage the color profiles, but on the printing page, when i click the color profile field, i can only choose 'managed by printer' and 'other'.
    When i click 'other', i get a popup screen, where i should be able to select a color profile, but this screen is completely empty, so there is nothing to select.
    How can i make a color profile appear in this screen?
    When i use printer managed, and select a color profile in my printer screen, i get very bad prints, thats why i want lightroom to manage the colors.
    PS: i have a HP D5160 printer.

    Hi Ronnie
    I have exactly the same problem but using a HP 3210 all-in-one printer. HP doesn´t seem provide ICC profile for their printerns. So, I guess thats the reason no beeing able to view them i th manage by application dialog box.
    I have serious problems getting acceptable colours on my prints from Lightroom 1.1 and 1.2 (no difference). No problem at all printing from Photoshop CS or Elements, getting fine printings.
    When chatting with HP support they refuse to answer straight questions about ICC profiles and start blaming on Adobe applications instead. Really frustrating.
    Really hope that someone finds an acceptable workaround.
    //Sten

  • Picture color profile

    Hi, I have a question and hopefully somebody can help me.
    In Photoshop I'm able to change the piture profile from RGB to sRGB and in Aperture I don't know how.
    Changing the profile, alouded me to print my pictures with Pthotoshop without a color cast, problem that I'm still having with Aperture.
    In a Adobe Forum I was told that due to the fact that my printer is not working with RGB I change the profile to my pictures from RGB to sRGB, as well to select on my printer options that the color is sRGB and on Photoshop to choose that the printer manages the colors.
    Is there any solution in Aperture, I'm getting a yellow color cast and I don't find any solution. Please help needed!!

    The issue with the picture profile is not about exporting is about importing to Aperture.
    About changing the profile from RGB to sRGB, thank you for the advice, I think that the one who gave me the advice also wasn't so sure, anyway it worked but I think because now in Photoshop the printer is managing the colors, issue that I don't think is so convenient.
    - HP Photosmart C5180
    - iMac OS X 10.5.4 with monitor calibrated with Spyder 3 Pro
    - Paper I have used several from HP and all of them shown a yellow cast when selecting the paper (HP Premium Plus, HP Advance Phot Paper, etc.)
    - Aperture 2.1.1
    In print dialog the settings are:
    - printer: HP Photosmart C5180
    - print settings from HP (aperture manual p. 486)
    * paper type : choose the type of paper I'm using, ie HP Premium Plus
    * quality: best
    * color: sRGB (I've also choosen Application Managed Colors but the result is the same)
    -color sync profile: System Managed however (I've also choosen the type of paper I'm using and the color cast appears)
    on this last setting, when I choose system managed colors, the pictures area really dark and with a color cast and even I move the gamma value between 1.15 and 1.2 the result is still bad.
    Many thanks!

  • Color spaces in Lightroom and Photoshop

    I read that Lightroom uses the large ProPhoto color Space and then again, that it's gamma curve ist close to sRGB. So what is my color space when working in Lightroom? ProPhoto, or sRGb, or something else?
    And what kind of a color management workflow between Photoshop and Lightroom do you advocate? Using ProphotoRGB or sRGB as color work space in Photoshop? I used to work in AdobeRGB in Photoshop. Has this to be changed to gain maximum color consistency?
    Thanks again for any help!
    Johann M Ginther

    Hey Claude,
    if it did not have an attached profile it is almost definitely in sRGB or, more rarely, Apple RGB. Lightroom always assumes sRGB for untagged files which is typically a safe bet. Photoshop generally uses the working space for untagged images. Since you had adobeRGB there, you should get a more saturated image in photoshop then in Lightroom. The same data is simply interpreted in a different color space leading to different colors. This has nothing to do with the monitor profile therefore and my initial hunch was wrong. So for untagged images in photoshop, you should usually assign sRGB to them instead of working space.
    >As for calibration hardware we do use them here so I will use it but since the Mac was brand new out the box I assumed that it was ok...
    Unfortunately, in general the canned calibration is not very good on Macs. I find very large differences between the shipped profile and a profile generated by a calibrator. Also, Apple ships profiles that set your display's gamma to 1.8 instead of the standard 2.2. This leads to many images in webbrowsers being too low contrast. Even Apple suggests recalibrating your screen at 2.2 if you do digital photography work (it's in their Aperture help files). In this case though the difference between Lightroom and Photoshop had nothing to do with the monitor profile but was related to photoshop interpreting untagged files in its working space instead of the more likely sRGB space.

  • COLOR DISPLAY IN LIGHTROOM AND PHOTOSHOP

    Hi I am a new user of Lightroom but a longtime user of Photoshop.
    My question is this:
    When opening the exact same TIFF file in Lightroom and Photoshop CS3 is there a way to configure Lightroom so that it will display the image exactly like Photoshop ? I mean the difference that I get is not dramatic but if there is a way to make it perfect I would love to know.
    Thanks,
    Claude from Montreal

    Hey Claude,
    if it did not have an attached profile it is almost definitely in sRGB or, more rarely, Apple RGB. Lightroom always assumes sRGB for untagged files which is typically a safe bet. Photoshop generally uses the working space for untagged images. Since you had adobeRGB there, you should get a more saturated image in photoshop then in Lightroom. The same data is simply interpreted in a different color space leading to different colors. This has nothing to do with the monitor profile therefore and my initial hunch was wrong. So for untagged images in photoshop, you should usually assign sRGB to them instead of working space.
    >As for calibration hardware we do use them here so I will use it but since the Mac was brand new out the box I assumed that it was ok...
    Unfortunately, in general the canned calibration is not very good on Macs. I find very large differences between the shipped profile and a profile generated by a calibrator. Also, Apple ships profiles that set your display's gamma to 1.8 instead of the standard 2.2. This leads to many images in webbrowsers being too low contrast. Even Apple suggests recalibrating your screen at 2.2 if you do digital photography work (it's in their Aperture help files). In this case though the difference between Lightroom and Photoshop had nothing to do with the monitor profile but was related to photoshop interpreting untagged files in its working space instead of the more likely sRGB space.

  • One again about color profiles and lightroom

    I have wide gamut monitor (nec pa271w) and I tried to calibrate it. After calibration it created new color profile and make it default in windows color managment. But now all pictures in Lightroom are not so colourful as they were before. If I choose srgb(default profile for windows) the colors become as they were before calibration but in this case I see srgb color space and not full color that my monitor can produce. I read articles about calibration but didn't find how to solve the problem with lightroom.

    You wrote
    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}But now all pictures in Lightroom are not so colourful as they were before.
    This is probably the effect of your now calibrated monitor vs. the uncalibrated one.
    Often uncalibrated monitors show highly over-saturated colors. It looks very rich and flashy and people are wowed.
    But these over-saturated colors cannot be printed and do not reflect the true state of the image data.
    When your monitor is calibrated properly it will display the colors as they should be.
    When you chose sRGB all the colors - particularly the reds and greens - will appear more saturated. That is the effect of this color space that is much smaller than Adobe RGB or Pro Photo RGB.
    LR will automatically find and select your calibrated color profile if it is saved in the right place / folder.
    And you can't change that. There is no provision for a different color space in LR.
    WW
    PS: As Pete and other posters have said already: Set the white point of your monitor to 6500 - that is the accepted standard. Don't choose sRGB to make your photos look good. Rather work with a calibrated monitor and then edit your photos in LR to your liking. You seem to think that your photos are a given and you have to adjust your monitor to make them look good - that's not how it's done.
    WW

  • How do I export a file with a CMYK color profile in Lightroom?

    I'm trying to save a photo with a CMYK color profile to send to a company who will print it for me. I've looked at the color profiles installed on my computer, and quite a few CMYK profiles appear to be there (in   /Library/Application Support/Adobe/Color/Profiles/Recommended). I'm not sure if they need to be in the "Profiles" folder specifically, or if it matters that they're in a subfolder of that folder. This is on a Mac computer, by the way.
    The problem is, when I go to export in Lightroom, and I choose "Other" in Color Profile, I'm not given any of the CMYK options.
    Thanks for your help!
    Ray

    ray7199 wrote:
    I'm trying to save a photo with a CMYK color profile to send to a company who will print it for me. I've looked at the color profiles installed on my computer, and quite a few CMYK profiles appear to be there (in   /Library/Application Support/Adobe/Color/Profiles/Recommended).
    Above and beyond what Jeff and John have told you, be VERY careful converting RGB to CMYK unless you have the specific ICC profile for that print provider. Probably a lot safer to send them tagged RGB and let them convert the data. Converting with a profile that isn't specifically targeted for the print process will produce huge headache's for you and the shop and potentially awful output which is going to be expensive. Ask them if they can accept RGB and send them maybe sRGB which of course you can do from Lightroom.

  • Colored lines in images from Photoshop CS2

    One of our users is having a problem with colored, horizontal, 1 pixel lines intermittently appearing in photos worked on in Photoshop CS2 (as far as I know he is in Tiger - unable to check presently as I am at home and he is in his home and everybody is off on holidays...). I will ask him about OS etc, but will probably not get an answer immediately.
    Does somebody maybe remember what causes this (if the description is enough)? Reminds me of the white lines in images sometimes talked about. But these are colored, horizontal. I did a forum search and a kb search but found nothing.

    Also try adding - bad Ram corruption - to your search as these are also symptoms of bad ram
    Typical symptoms of bad Ram in Photoshop include rows lines patches of bad pixels on screen that also print (the actual file is being corrupted). If the bad pixel areas are on the monitor, but do not print (the actual file is not corrupted), video card or video-card drivers are prime suspects.
    A bad cable, bad card, bad switch, bad/misconfigured router, bad repeater, bad termination, bad wiring, bad hard drive, bad controller, bad connections, bad logic board, bad CPU just about anything between your computer and other computers can also cause these symptoms in Photoshop, said Adobe computer engineer Chris Cox.

  • Embed Color Profile When Saving In Photoshop?

    Hi all -
    Let's say I am saving a TIFF as a background for a DVDSP 4 menu out of Photoshop. Do I want to have the Embed Color Profile checked or not? How does a make a difference to DVDSP (if it does)? Mine is set to sRGB IEC61966-2.1
    Thanks,
    Jason

    I believe sRGB is the default for most screen-based systems such as DVD studio. You shouldn't notice a significant shift if you stay in this color space in DVD studio. Just make sure it isn't Adobe RGB. This is a very specialized space for advanced Photography for use with hexachrome printing workflows. Monitors and TV's can't reproduce the colors represented in Adobe RGB and it is unwise to make color decisions on such monitors without advanced training on how and why to use wider color spaces such as Adobe RGB. In contrast sRGB is created to be about the same as most monitors ad TV's so what you see is very similar to what will be visible on your target medium.

  • Pictures color profile

    Do I need to enclose a color profile (Adobe RGB or Srgb) with the pix I use in a photobook I want to order. Normally my pictures are shot in Adobe RGB (with Nikon D2X), but when I go to the processing lab I enclose a Srgb profile for better printing results (on Fuji Premium Digital colorprint paper).
    G4   Mac OS X (10.4.9)  

    keizer:
    Welcome to the Apple Discussions. Apple has indicated that they use the sRGB color profile for books, prints, etc. So you'll have to change the embedded profile to sRGB before ordering the book. To batch change them you can download the use the Automator application "Embed sRGB Profile" that I created. To embed the profile into all of your library's original files just drag the Originals folder from you iPhoto Library onto the application on the Desktop and it will automatically do it's thing. If you want to just embed in the book's photos, the best way would be to move all of them into a new roll and then drag that roll's folder from the Originals folder onto the application. You can download it from Toad's Cellar.
    Another way is to setup iPhoto to use the Embed sRGB Profile application as the "editor" of choice in iPhoto's General preferences section under the "Edit photo" menu. Then you double click on a photo in the book to bring up the slider. Then double click again and it will open with the application and quickly close. It's hardly noticeable. Once you've changed the photos in the book you can reset the preferences to what they were previously.
    Do you Twango?
    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've written an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

Maybe you are looking for

  • SAP BI Transports

    Hi, While doing transports in SAP BI, I am collecting the objects through automatic collection (before and after). But still I am getting errors while importing. Please guide me about the resolution. Thanks, Kishore

  • Mail changes pdf to jpg

    When I attach a pdf and send mail, the pdf is changed to a jpg. I need for the recipient to get a pdf, not a jpg. How do I change this?

  • PLEASE for the iphone 5 create a lock button so when you are talking you dont mute or make other calls!!

    PLEASE for the Iphone 5 create a lock button so it don't mute, make calls or press buttons while talking on the phone!! This is a major set back and would make my decission wheather or not I stay with another apple Iphone! I know it is sensitive and

  • Having problems need ur help

    hi everyone, I have developed an application in java, consisting of 62+ class files, now the problem i am having is that whenever i make a jar file, it doesn't run.. as it is suppose to!!!! Can anyone tell me exactly how to do it in an efficient and

  • Création d'une application Android avec Labview

    sBonjour, je cherche à developper avec Labview, une application android pour l'installer après sur une tablette tactile, comment je peux faire ça?