Planed delivery cost- account is not picking in MIRO?

Hi,
Here in pricing procedure even though for the planned delivery costs condition type - account key and account is assigned in obyc & even then the relevant GL is not picking, instead only manual account assigned GL only picked up always kindly let me know the possible causes?
when I create a cost centre based PO with acct assignment category K, the GL which I am assigning in PO only picked up..
kindly let me know the possible causes for the same?
regards,
ARCHU

Hi,
1st one should know where & how account assigned PO will be used.If you used account assigned PO(lts say K), then during GR, you will have account entries
Consumption A/C :Dr
GR/IR Clearing A/C: Cr
During MIRO posting, the GR/IR Clearing A/C as accounting entries:
GR/IR Clearing A/C: Dr
Vendor A/C: Cr
Check the link how GL account for a material group is treated, when a purchase order is created with account assigned with material group and all assignment done in OBYC , OMQW & OME9.
http://www.bluemarlinsys.com/ns/0603-03.asp
Regards,
Biju K

Similar Messages

I need to pick po amount+ delivery cost for bill of lading in miro

i have a requirement from customer by using miro tcode when they select use bill of lading it shoud pick po amount and delivery cost default it is picking delivery cost.plz give me solution for picking both amounts
can anyone suggest me an idea can go for badi/ exit or implict enhancement.plz give a solution
Moderator Message: You have asked the same question with a different UID here: Re: Facing a problem in miro Well, looks like its time ban you from SCN.
Edited by: kishan P on Aug 5, 2011 11:43 AM

i have a requirement from customer by using miro tcode when they select use bill of lading it shoud pick po amount and delivery cost default it is picking delivery cost.plz give me solution for picking both amounts
can anyone suggest me an idea can go for badi/ exit or implict enhancement.plz give a solution
Moderator Message: You have asked the same question with a different UID here: Re: Facing a problem in miro Well, looks like its time ban you from SCN.
Edited by: kishan P on Aug 5, 2011 11:43 AM

How to configure Free of charge posting to cost account and not to balance?

Hi,
If we post GI for a free of charge delivery (sample) the following will be posted:
Cost of Sales 100
Finished goods 100
But we do not want to post to Cost of Sales but to a cost account.
What do I need to change?
Regards,
Eric.

Hi Eric van Zundert,
Follow below mentioned procedure;
1. OMJJ - Copy a new movement type as "901" from Movement type "601". For new movement type change the Valuation Modifier to "YAX" instead of "VAX" and SAVE.
2. OBYC - Here go to T/E key "GBB" and do the account determination for the new valuation modifier "YAX" of new movement type (Created in Step1).
3. VOV6 - Go to the Schedule Line Category (which is getting determined in Free of Charge Order) and assign the new Movement Type "901" instead of "601" and save.
Note: - If this Schedule Line Category is used for multiple Sales Orders then copy and create a new Schedule Line Category and do the changes for this one as suggeste din step3 and also do the schedule line category determination.
Now create a new order and do delivery and PGI and check A/c entry, also check during delivery it should pick up new Movement Type.
You need to take help of ur SD Consultant in this case.

Configure Unplanned Delivery Cost Account

Hi Experts
Please help me. I want to configure Unplanned Delivery Cost hit Price Diff. G/L account right now its hit Martial A/c. Please let me know where I can do that.
Thanks & Regards,
Hemant Maurya

Hi Kiran,
Thanks for your reply. In my system we have not maintained any G/L Code in OBYC  Unplanned Delivery Cost (UPF). Then what will I do? Please let me know.
Rgds,
Hemant

Unplanned delivery cost account assignment

Dear Friends,
I have configure the transaction key UPF in obyc. Here I have entered Inc/Dec account, but during the MIR7 Simulation, The Unplanned delivery cost is hitting Inventory Account of material.
Can You please suggest, where the issue may be and how to resolve it.
Rgds, Kraheja.

Hi,
Check the settings in the below mention path
SPRO-- MM -- Invoice Verification --- Logistics Invoice Verification -- Incoming Invoice --Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted Assign 2 against your company code. It will help you to post in another line item
reagrds

Limit cart unknown Account Assignment Not picking Approval email id

Hi All,
when i am trying to create a Shopping cart with unknown Account Assignment, at first instance approval email id is not picking. When i made some changes in the item data (say Descrtiption ) it is picking the approval email id. in SRM
We are SRM 5 to 7 upgrade, In SRM 5 there is a note to 974239 which will solve the issue. But the note is valid forSRM 7 EHP3 Version.
Can any one help me in giving the latest note.
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Charan M

Hi
<b>Related links/ SAP OSS Notes to check out -></b>
Note 861889 - Limitations on limit and service PO's in case of ECS
Note 1046593 - Limit PO - Unable to delete and create new item
Note 966323 - Service Item: Not able to create PO in ERP backend
Note 969077 - LIMIT:SC with Account Assignment Unknown and IR_IND checked
Note 1000184 - Account assignment error when document transfer to back end
Note 1052892 - Account Assignment not visible for Limit Shopping Cart
Note 933618 - Multiple account assignments for limit item are lost
Re: Limit PO(Item category D instead of B)
SE 518 No account assignment exists for service li ne 0000000000
Creating SC with Dummy Account Assignment
Re: Account assignment on SRM
Re: Problem on account assignment
Re: Account details not coming while creating a Shopping Cart with Limit Item
LIMIT SC
<u>Other related details -></u>
Use Screen variants (Transaction - SHD0) to change item overview and search result screens.
BADI - There is one BADI to hide/show some SC item creation links, there is one BADI to control screen details of PO, CTR... but not SC (and not external screens).
So, as usual, identify the template and change the HTML code in SE80.
To implement a more complex logic, like the default check box, change the ABAP code (usually in the PBO), if required.
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

F.27 ACCOUNT STATEMENT NOT PICKING OPEN ITEMS

When I run F.27, and fillin all required fields, and click execute but get a message that no data exists. THough there are balances for this particular customer but in F.27, it is not picking up that customer. What am I missing. I have chosen the correct output control. we were able to get the statement by entering the same information earlier but nowI am not able to get it,
Is there anything that needs to be done in customer master??/
Lakshmi

No there are still open items, some have cleared and some have not for the same customer. Please tell me where am I going wrong.
Also need to clarify, if the customer is cleared , it wont pick up any statement.
Thanks

Excise taxes are not picking in MIRO

Hi,
Hello,
We are creating the Imorted PO with Tick of Gr based IV in PO.
And created the Inbound delivery for line item of the PO.
After this we were go for MIGO with ref to PO.
And created the MIGO.
We will pay the Customs duty later.. some special accounts head will pay him monthly.
my question is... In MIRO(layout is planned delivery cost) with ref to PO..... Qty and Amount field is blank.
For one line item of PO,,, we need to enter 7 conditions value in MIRo.... suppose if the PO is having the more than 10 line item. we need to enter 70 conditions..... it may make error....
we want that system should take the values automatically in MIRO
regards
sapman man

hi,
in import case u r verifing the invoice of customes before u make the GRN dtas why it is blank.
again
as currency rate keep on changing so it is not advisible to copy the PO value because that will not match to customs invoice.
u need to key in the values manually only.
u can develope one BDC for this if u require and entries are more.
regards,
sujit

Service Tax condition not picking during MIRO

Hi,
Referring earlier posted thread,
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2135441&tstart=0
I want to know insert a Tax Code - VAT for 10% and a Condition Type - Service Tax for 10.3%...
During MIRO, Service Tax Amount is not Picking... Why???
There is any solution for it.....

Hi,
If we create Service condition type, then why need to create Tax code in FTXP and maintain in FV11...
Why both things need to create...??
No need to maintain
check for your service tax condition type
Cond. class A Discount or
Calculat.type A percentage
Cond.category B Delivery co
and you have accrual tick for your condition in t-code M/06
also check in your pricing procedure you have assign account key and accrual key for your condition type in t-code
M/08
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Cenvat clearing account is not coming in MIRO for Basic excise

Dear sir,
I have created the PO . After that i did GR for same at that I capture excise invocie& post it.
Accounting document is created for the same
here is accounting enrtry
        cenvat Basic = 100 debit
        cenvat edu cess = 2 debit
       Cenvat Higher Ecess =1 debit.
   Cenvat clearing account = 103 credit
when i go the miro
after simulating in miro i found
cenvat clearing account = 2 debit
but it should be 103 debit
why this is coming please help me...

Hi,
Generally it happens if CENVAT Clearing Account in not assigned in OB40 to the Tax Account Keys. But, as per you it has been maintained. So the following if you are using Tax Procedure TAXINN;
SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Basic Settings > Determination of Excise Duty > Condition-Based Excise Determination > Classify Condition Types

Goods and delivery cost processing at one instance through MIRO

Hello,
Is there any possibility of doing bill wise MIRO for both goods and planned delivery cost in a single screen apart from refering PO and option goods+planned delivery cost?
The scenario is; vendor is common for both goods and delivery cost,organization want to pass MIRO bill wise for goods and delivery cost at same instance.
Regards

Hi
The scenario is; vendor is common for both goods and delivery cost,organization want to pass MIRO bill wise for goods and delivery cost at same instance.
If vendor is same we can do it for multiple Po at same instance in MIRO,what Mr, Bijay Kumar said ,follow this
Regards
Kailas ugale

GL Account Document not picked by Standard Program

Hi Friends,
I have an issue which is related to GL Accounts
Everyday 5000 odd documents will be Picked by standard program and the GL documents are cumulated to one particular document and it will be sent to another system through idoc.
The issue here is on one particular day one single GL Account document has not been picked by the program and cumulated. Instead that has been picked on next month..
So i need to know what might be the reason for the delay in picking the document for particular day.
Help me with solution in this issue
Thanks in advance
kishore

Thansk for the reply.
I also thought of one reason among the four u specified..But i will stil make it clear to u so that i will get better idea on this issue.
Like in one system all the documents wil be picked and GL account will be posted and through idoc it is sent to another system where the balance should be equal
when i compare two systems one is 4.7 and another is 4.5 version.
In FS10N for all the month the balance is talied for both the systems like the credit ,debit everything gets tallied for the particular document number. But for one particular month there is a diffence only in the credit amount of two systems..The 4.5 system shows some amt less than the total.
But that problem also solved but it got delayed by a month..
Thats the reason this issue arised, Why it took this delay..Could you pls suggest me witht this.
If any kind of prooof is ther to show this might be the reason for client
Thanks
kishore

In j1ih OTHR Secondary education cess G/L account is not picking

HI,
Thanks in advance,
while doing j1ih in OTHR we are not getting in Secondary education cess G/l Account, we are getting only BED, ECS , Excise duty paid,
i all ready maintained in account determnation OTHR RG23A AT1 ,
Regards,
Prema.D

Hello Prema,
Please check the following table J_1ITRNACC whether you have assigned dr/cr for RG23AT1 under ETT MRDY. I think you were checking for ETT OTHR. Please check for MRDY.
Hope this helps.
Vikas.

Now have iphone6 and signed for different type lower cost account. Not seen on billing service. to have started Oct 1,2014

**after receiving iphone6 and signing 2 year contract, negotiated for a change in plan with lower cost and discount... not seen on october bill as promised..totally unable to obtain help on phone to verizon. thanks

Thanks for the response. I had the 65 advantage plan for 2 years. Service rep at Verizon store assisted me when I activated my new iPhone 6. She noted that over the 2 years i had used only a few minutes of talk, one to 2 texts per month ( at a fee of $. 20 each ) and a minuscule amount of data... and that the phone was for emergency contact to me from my disabled invalid wife only. She searched and found a discount special plan for a savings of $15.00 per month with a final monthly fee before taxes of $45 and not $59 per month to start on Oct 1st. It does not have a name to the plan just that it carries this special discount. That is all I can tell you. Thanks for the assistance. Await your reply. Thanks
Bob Bonus
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> this is Incorrect email........... should be [email protected] Wednesday oct 8th, 2014... do not know if you received this response to your email a few days ago. Sorry for the mistake. Await your response. thanks
bob bonus

Commitment item not picking while MIRO posting for Service entry sheet

Hi to all,
We have activated Fund Management in middle of the year where there were purchase order completed to till MIGO. When we do MIRO now system unable to pick commitment item from FMDERIVE.
We have created Commitment item as 50/3 combination ( No budget check ) and assigned to GR/IR clearing account.
We also activated trace in FMDERIVE and checked MIRO posting and found that derivation is working properly but while posting it is triggering error.
Some one advise me as it affected daily activities.
Thanks & Regards,
Y.Kiran Babu

Hi,
For the purchase order completed and the related MIGO created before FM was implemented, you need to run FMCN and FMCT.
I will explain to you in detail all the information related to the matter.
First of all, it seems to be in your PO that does not have FM account assignment (funds center and commitment item) in account assignment TAB. In addition, the error occurs usually also because in your SES the FM account assignment is missing.
For GR and IR documents FM always takes the major part of the FM account assignment from the PO.
You can fill these account assignments by using the programs RFFMCHAN/RFFMCHAT.
FMCN/FMCT must be run for the first document in the chain, which is the PO in case you don't have a PR assigned to this PO or an earmarked fund document. If you have PR's assigned to the PO's please run FMCN/FMCT for the PR first.
When executing the FMCT transaction, ALL documents selected in one group must be tested and processed successfully TOGETHER. If any one document fails, the ENTIRE group is shown as in error.
Therefore, first step is to ensure that the reference PO has a valid FM account assignment and is updated in FM. This should be done by FMCN/FMCT and subsequent posting with FMN4N (see reconstruction note 189761).
The SES itself might not be changed by FMCT. Therefore you should fulfill the FM account assignments in SES manually or with a custom program.
Please check also your table FM01X. As an alternative solution, you can enable one of these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
You can find more information about it in text part of notes 1146677 and 923672.
FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672. This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines. Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are not incorrectly derived.
Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the following programs:
1) FMN0 for this PO/GR to see if the actual values are correct in FM table FMIFIIT (FM actual line items).
2) Run report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF). The reconstruction programs always update the totals records in Funds Management. Therefore, you do not normally need to reconstruct the totals records. However, if you suspect there are data inconsistencies in the totals records, you can analyze and correct these using the report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF).
If you correct the totals records, you must do this before you reconstruct the assigned values (see below).
3) Run reconstruction for AVC
You can also reconstruct the assigned values using the following tools:
    o Report BPINDX03 (transaction FMBV) for former budgeting
    o Report RFFMAVC_REINIT (transaction FMAVCREINIT) for the Budget
       Control System (BCS)
Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values).
I believe that this resolve your inquiry.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Planed delivery cost- account is not picking in MIRO?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for