PM order settlement to asset - but I want statistical posting to I/O????

We use internal orders for our capital budgets - we set a plan for the year. We do requisitions against the order which gives us our commitment. We have workflow to upper management to release the requisiton. Once done the req is turned into PO but at this point the account assignment is changed from F to A. When migo and miro are done you can look at the report for the internal order and see a statistical actual posting - valuation type 11. The actual posting capitalized the asset. We can settle PM orders to assets - no problem - but I want to also reference the capital budget internal order in that settlment rule. This will allow me to settle the actual costs and post to the asset but get that statistical actual amount to the internal order. How do I do this? I understand the hierarchy in SAP between cost center, order, and asset. On my settlement rule for the PM order my receiver is fixed asset, but I also put the internal order number in the order field. When I settle with KO88 the cost hits my asset but I get no statistical posting to the internal order. Is it possible?

It's not possbible to get a statistical posting against the I/O from PM order settlement.

Similar Messages

Items to list in invoice but not wanted to post into accounting

Hi - We have a BOM, both header and components are price related. We want header material to have net value as a sum of all component's net value, and we wanted to bring all the components into invoice (Del Related) but only header material will be posted into accounting but not the components. We want components to show in invoice but not into accounting. Any ideas to complete this need??
Reg
Siva

Hi Siva,
Please refer to note 77414, situation 1 for this.
If you want the VPRS also cumulated on the main item, you would also need to implement the solution
from note 352441.
The note explains the solution by taking item category TAN & ZTAN as an example.
Please implement accordingly based on your own item categore.
Regards,
Alex

Internal order settlement to G/L account

Dear All,
User has created one internal order 650002012 and the settlement profile is created settle to G/L account S882000000. this is a cost element category "1" (Loss on contract cancellation & co).
In the internal order The Responsible cost center is DA01D89998 (Validation & Eng Admin-St) the profit center for this "DA01".
In the internal order the Requesting cost center is DA26ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Deltron), the profit center is "DA26"
in the settlement profile when i double click on the settlement rule, he has assigned the Cost center DA01ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Ko) and the profit center is "DA01".
But when he execute the T.C "KO8G" the system is showing the error is " G/L account requires an assignement to CO object".
1. The receiver G/L account has created as a cost element. is this correct?
2. In the allocation structure do we have to select the "By cost element check box" or do we have to give the secondary cost element in the settlement cost element field.
Please give the sugessions to solve this problem.
Thanks and regards,
Rao.

It sounds like you are a little confused on how internal order settlement works. If you want the internal order to settle to a G/L account then you must enter the G/L account number in the settlement rule in the internal order. To do this, click on the settlement rule button in the order, select category G/L and enter the G/L account number. In order for you to be able to select G/L as a settlement object the settlement profile you've assigned to the order must allow this. Check the settlement profile and make sure that G/L account is listed as settlement optional or settlement required. Also check the allocation structure that is attached to the settlement profile. In the allocation structure you must have an entry under the settlement cost element for receiver category G/L. Here you should specify a cost element of type 22 as the settlement cost element.
When you make those settings you will be able to specify the receiving G/L account in the internal order. The system will then credit the internal order for the settlment amount with the credit posted on the category 22 cost element specified in the allocation structure. The debit will appear on the G/L account you specified in the internal order's settlement rule. Normally, the receiving G/L account would not be setup as a cost element. if you do set it up as a cost element you will need to use an automatic account assignment setting (OKB9) to specify the cost object that it will post to.
thanks,

Process Order Settlement without GR or GI

Hello,
I have a quick question that I need help with please. A process order has no Goods Receipt yet (only consumption) as of month-end when we settle all orders. Will such an order settle and post an entry to GL even though it is not completed yet?
Also, if an order has Goods Receipt but no consumption (I know it doesnt make sense, but it is an error order), will it still settle?
Thanks,
Gligor.

Hi,
If I understood correctly, you have consumptions of RM from your inventory but you dont have production GR. You wanted to do the order settlement.
- Why do you want to settle order that is not completed in production? If there are any expenses on the order during the month, shouldn't these expenses be tracked as WIP?
- Also, for the case where there are GR without GI, are there any activity consumptions on the process order?
Thanks,
Ram

Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error

Workflow Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error, but settlement is done no problem in updation. But notification error there.
Notification of completion cannot be generated
Problems occurred when generating a mail
Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
Error handling for work item 000112476185
Work item 000112476185: Object 000020154849 method UPDATESETTLEMENTRULE cannot be executed
Call transaction was canceled.
No errors occurred -> Details in long text
No errors occurred -> Details in long text
Please advice what could be the reason this error.
Best Regards,
Prabhakar

Message no. WL821
Message no. FD009
Message no. WL863
Problems occurred when generating a mail
Message no. SWF_RUN534
Error handling for work item 000133673828
Message no. SWF_RUN630
Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
Message no. SWF_RUN535
Thanks,
Prabhakar

Order settlement to G/L instead of Cost Centre.

Dear All,
My client has following scenario:
1. Cost centers are created as sections of the plant.
2. G/Ls are created with respect to activity (i.e normal consumption, project consumption, turnaround consumption).
In general maintenance order is settled to cost center that is copied from equipment master to order settlement rule. But, in above scenario cost should be settled to combination of "Cost Center + G/L" i.e. if mechanical section creates an order for any of the above said activities, the order should be settled to mechanical cost center and respective G/L account.
"One way around to this issue can be accomplished by settling the order directly to G/L defined in combination with section and activity."
Is this a correct practice if we settle maintenance order directly to G/L and do not use cost centers?
Your expert opinions and any other solution if you can suggest in this regard will be very helpful.
Thanks.

Hi,
Maintenance Orders are generally settled to cost centres as maintenance activities are nothing but Expenses. Please note that Cost Centers are meant to capture costs through GL accounts which are to be created as a Primary Cost elements in CO and the costs are passed to the cost center through account assignments.
The settlement will require an assignment to a CO object which may be a cost centre,order,WBS etc. If you are trying to simply assign the settlement receiver as "GL account" in Order, system will ask you for asignment to a CO obeject. Hence it is imperative to use cost centres.
For your scenario, you need to specify the range of cost elements to which settlement is allowed in the "Allocation structure" configuration. Tick on settlement by cost elements.Allocation structure is linked to your settlement profile.
When settlement process runs, your order cost will flow to the respective cost centre(from settlement rule) and the corresponding cost element will be affected. The details of debit and credit can be checked through the CO document which is generated.
Hope this throws some light on your query.
Regards,
S.Basu

Settlement rule for several assets but one internal order number

Hi,
I have a question regarding the settlement rule for an internal order. I have issued an internal order number to capture costs for a construction project. When the project is completed how do I update the settlement rule for the internal order to several assets all for different amounts?
For example an internal order number has collected costs of 150,000.00 for the completion of a building. When the building is complete and I want to do a final settlement of the internal order. I have one asset for land improvements for 43,000, another asset for the HVAC system for 33,000 and building costs of 74,000. When updating the settlement rule I know to create the assets and update the settlement rule with these asset numbers, but I am unclear on how to assign multiple assets with differnt amounts.

Hi ,
In the settlement rule , you need to select the Receiver as FXA and then enter the Asset number and then you will have to put the % that you want to settle to .
Like if you have 100/- Rs. total cost and you want to settle it to 2 assets in 60/- Rs. and 40/- Rs.
Then you will have to enter 2 line items in settlement rule with diffrent asset numbers and in proportion you will have to say 40 % and 60% , based on which the final settlement would happen .
So make the proportion changes in the settlement rule accordingly .
Regards ,
Dewang T

Order settlement for Low value asset

Dear all,
In Global company the depreciation area 01 is where depreciation for USGAAP is calculated. The depreciation are 30 is where the BRGAAP depreciation is calculated.
When I need to buy an asset I create the asset, create an internal order, assign the internal order to a Purchase order and after invoice receiving I settle the internal order. The internal order already created in it settlement rule have one AUC and the asset created in the first step;
The problem is there are some assets that for BRGAAP they depreciate but for USGAAP they are expense. If I deactivate the depreciation area 01 when I run Ko88 to settle the order the system issues the error message "Error during acquisition transfer: Depr. area does not exist". Of Course this area is deactivated.
My question is How is the solution when I don't want to have the depreciation of depreciation area 01 but I want to have the postings of other depreciation areas ? Can I have a specific asset class different of the others depreciation areas where I can have only my BRGAAP ? How ?
Regards

Hi,
To do this, use transaction code OAYZ. In there, for the asset class and depreciation area where you do not want dep posting to happen, select the depreciation key "0000". The depreciation will not be calculated.
Cheers.

Internal Order Down Payment settle to Asset

Hi,
I have a requirement related to Down Payment shows in Order. User want that if there is any down payment against purchase order & purchase order contain real order, they want that FBL1N/FAGLL03 report show Order Number in reports. So that down payment can be traced against Internal Order.
Now I have tested the whole scenario. everything is ok till down payment. I can seen Order number in FBL1N report and also in FAGLL03 report.
Now the problem is here,
Real Internal Order is created which will be settle to AUC asset.
Purchase order is made with Assignment category 'F' . Real Internal Order is mention with GL.
Now Down Payment is made against Purchase Order with mention Purchase Order. I can see in FBL1N report.
Now when i am going to settle Internal Order to asset, there are errors which are rectified by configuring. But when i see AUC asset, down payment is also settle on asset.
If Purchase Order is raised with amount 1500000.
Down Payment is made with amount 50000
when i settle Internal Order 1500000 & 50000 also settle on Asset.
I dont want to settle 50000 on asset and when i see KOB1 report, i only see 1500000 amount.
Or is there any report in which i can extract Order with down payment data. I can develop Z report but i want to do it in standard.
Waiting for reply....
Regards
AJ

For Down payment data,
you need to use FBL1N transaction.
probably, down payment will not reflect in internal order. Expense GL with Internal order will reflect in the internal order actual values.
Thanks
Sudhir Krishna Kumar Singh

Actual cost of Production Order settled to Fixed Assets

Dear all,
My client is doing in-house production of moulds (internal order suggestion is not accepted by the client) for which
they have the following
1. BOM
2. Machine hour
3. labour
4. overhead etc
5.plan value
6. actual value
Can i settle the actual cost of production order to Fixed Asset ?
If yes
what are process kindly give me if any process other then the below
1.production order created
2. settlement profile - FA is settlement optional
3. allocation structure
4. Asset created
5 define asset in settlement rule
Kindly give me your valuable input
regards
elango

Hi,
Although i am not CO expert , please check with your FICO consultant who are expert before make the final call.
During settlement to a G/L account or a fixed asset, the system ignores additional account assignments that were manually specified in the distribution rule.
Based on what i know .
you can stipulate that settlement may be made to cost centers and orders, but not to fixed assets.
The Settlement profile is something that you need to create a settlement rule to settle the actual costs of a sender object.
About the Settlement rule is something that contains the distribution rules for the sender. It will define how the way to settle the cost.
Allocation Structure
In the settlement structure you combine the primary and secondary cost elements into groups, in which debits are then posted to the sender objects. For each group, you specify whether (for settlement to a given receiver type) settlement is performed
by cost element or using a settlement cost element.
For example, you might use settlement cost elements:
To document the purpose of an order (such as, repairs or maintenance)
To reduce data volumes (you can combine a number of debit cost elements
under one settlement cost element).
TQ

I want to pre-order the iphone 5 but i am worried that i wont get it on time as i have a plane at the 22nd of sep at mid night, will it come in time?

I want to pre-order the iphone 5 but i am worried that i wont get it in time as i have a plane at the 22nd of sep at mid night, will it come on time?

You're welcome.
FYI:
I ordered an iPhone 4S, on pre-order day, for my wife. It came a day early...much to our surprise.

Internal order not settling as asset is already deactivated.

Hi friends,
when iam trying to post KO88 internal order settlement it is giving the message that "ASSET xxxxxxxxxx is deactivated",in my settlement rule there is not that asset another asset no is there,
where is the link for asset and IO ?
How to see the deactivated asset?
thanks,
Srini.

Hello,
Might be your said asset number is sub asset no. which is coming in the error msg asset no.
first check the relation between error msg asset and which asset you are going to do settelement.
The asset deacivation button will available in the Asset master record general data.
If helpful pls assign points,
Rams

Want to display the item in MDM2 but dont want the customer to order it

Hi
I want to display the item in the catalog but i want to block the material from being orderd. how do i do that?

Hi,
SRM-MDM Catalog has somthing like display mode. You can set it in UI customizing. If you want to block order for only some of items, please create custom filed like "display only=X" and check the value in the BADI BBP_CATALOG_TRANSFER.
Regards,
Masa

I have and apple account but upon ordering prints i cannot login it wants a new account

i have an apple account with valid password, works for itunes and everything else but aperture wants me to create another account to order books/prints any help appreciated

Yeah, this is a known problem -- and a pain. When it asks you to "create" a new account, just input all the information from your existing account. You might even have to re-enter your credit card data. But just go ahead and do all that (maybe even twice), and it WILL work. Just keep at it.

I just bought Adobe Acorbat DC, but it want old series No. or not allow me to use. the question is I have no that kind of No. the old one is a trial, even follow "find your series No" solution, my account & order history was blank, please tell me what sho

I just bought Adobe Acorbat DC, but it want old series No. or not allow me to use. the question is I have no that kind of No. the old one is a trial, even follow "find your series No" solution, my account & order history was blank, please tell me what should I do now@ !

this page shows the 'full' version (more expense ~$500 u.s.) and the 'upgrade' version (less expensive ~$200 u.s.), Plans and pricing | Adobe Acrobat DC
if you bought the less expensive one you must own a qualifying (acrobat X or acrobat XI) version

PM order settlement to asset - but I want statistical posting to I/O????

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for