PO: Condition type maintained in header level affect the price per unit
Hi,
When I create a PO (Tcode ME21N) with 2 line items:
Line Item 1: $5.00 per unit, order 1 unit
Line Item 2: $10.00 per unit, order 1 unit
Then I put a condition type: Transportation Charges of $10.00 at header level.
The system will auto calculate and proportionate the transportation charges into that 2 line items. So now, the price per unit of the 2 line items has been change:
Based on the formula [ (original price per unit * Transportation Charges / total order value) + original price per unit ]:
Line Item 1: $8.33 per unit [ ($5.00 * $10.00 / $15.00) + $5.00 ]
Line Item 2: $16.67 per unit [ ($10.00 * $10.00 / $15.00) + $10.00 ]
There are 2 things here that we want to do:
1. We donu2019t want the transportation charges affect the price per unit. Means we do not want the price per unit to be changed. We want the transportation charges stand alone on it owns.
2. Also, sometimes the transportation charges is paid to a different supplier, meaning the original order value paid to supplier A, and the transportation charges paid to the supplier B (which is a transportation company).
Can anyone advise how can I do this?
Thank you.
hai;
give the transportation charges in item level
go to 'item details' tab and select individual item ,go to condition ,maintain the 'frb1' value seperatly for the two items in the PO.You can also assign seperate transportation vendor for items sepertly.
For selecting the transportation vendor ;you just select the line where you maintained the frieght value and click on the 'condition detail' button shown in the bottom of the screen then on next screen there is an option for giving the transportation vendor acccount no.
try
hope this will help you
by fasal
Similar Messages
-
TABLE for storing the condition type maintained in a RFQ
Dear All ,
I am maintaining some condition types ( both at header & item level ) while creating a RFQ .
I want to know in which table can I find the condition types which I maintained for that particular RFQ.
I have tried searching EKKO with the following parameter
Purchasing Document No = RFQ No.
Statu = 'A'
and tried to retrieve the valuein KNUMV field , so that i can pass the value of KNUMV to table KONV and retireve the condition .
But KNUMV for document type 'A' ( RFQ ) is coming as blank for all the records.
Requesting help on this .Hi,
Condition types are stored in KONP table. You can try linking tables EKKO / EKPO with KONP with required fields to get the data stored.
Regards
Ram -
How can I have the pricing conditions at the item and header level of the d
How can I have the pricing conditions at the item and header level of the delivery? There exist "condition" tabs both the header and the item level of the delivery but the contents of the tabs are empty. I'll be happy if you can help me. Thanks in advance....
Hi
If you want to have the pricing procedure at delivery level then you need to assign a pricing procedure at delivery level also
Just go through the path to maintain the pricing procedure at delivery level.
IMG -> Logistics execution -> Shipping -> Basic Shipping Functions -> Pricing -> Pricing Procedure. for Delivery.
But can you be more clear if the above one is not your query ?
Regards
Srinath -
Is there an FM by which we can get condition record values at header level
Hi All,
Please help Is there an FM by which we can get condition record values at header level.
Thanks,
Gaurav MittalHi
There is no exact FM for this
Take the Header level condition number from the doc (KNUMV) and pass to the KONV-KNUMV and take the respective Header level amounts(KWERT) from it based on Condition Typse (KSCHL)
we use VBAK-KNUMV(for SO leve ol)r VBRK-KNUMV(for Billing Doc's) or EKKO-KNUMV (for PO's) to get the record values from KONV
Regards
Anji -
How does condition category affect the price procedure
Hello Gurus,
there is a case as following:
if the condition type in the pricing analysis says in a billing document that the condition is found and set, and one is using the condition requirement number 024 (which only determines the price in billing document) yet still has to do new pricing in order to obtain the condition record, Should the condition category be blank, the system would propose the message condition is found and set but does not provide an actual condition record.
the fault would be that the condition category on the condition type should be equal to L.
so my question is " how does condition category affect the price procedure" ? thanks very much!Hi Zhang,
-->Condition category is a classification of conditions according to predefined criteria.
-->These categories include packaging costs, delivery costs, output taxes and discounts.
-->The classification of conditions by condition categories can be used for analysis.
I hope it will clear for you
Regards,
Murali. -
Adding Variant in Header Level in the Sales Order
Field "Card Verification Value" (CVV) is part of the Standard from Support Package SAPKH47028 onwards. But if you like you can use a variant for screen SAPMV45A4440 and set
field "Card Verif.Code" to invisible in this variant.
This is the reply from SAP after implementing the new support pack. Now there is an additional field in VA01 that I am trying to remove.
I can add the variant in Table Settings but that is on Item Level in the Sales Order (VA01). How do I do it in Header Level?Hi,
Go to SHD0 ,write down the Transaction code , transaction variant then go to Tab " With Processing'.
Now you will be in T Code VA01 ,press enter and you will get all the variants maintained in Header Level.
Now you can activate / deactivate as per your requirement.
Best Regards,
Ankur -
Condition type date should be same to the pricing procedure date
hi
i have an problem
the problem is that condition type date is not same to the pricing procedute date
details of the problem
1. created a sales order the pricing date is 01.04.2006
2. when i go conditions in the sales order, as i go for details of the condition type date the is 04.04.2006
this date should be same ie 01.04.2006
give the solutions and relevant fields or procedure for this i will be greatful to all of u
byeBraja,
Check this
Goto the billing plan tab in the corresponding line item and check the rule that is determined. Now go to the configuration of this rule table by using the path
SPRO>SD> Billing> Billing Plan> Define rules for determining dates and choose your Applicable rule and click on the details.
There you will see the Calendar ID field where you will have to maintain the applicable factory calendar. I think this should work and your billing date on the item relevant for billing plan should be the same as the other item.
Hope this helps,
Ravin -
I dropped my iphone vertically on the ground.The screen works when it is locked.When unlocked, it's broken down from the clock.Can it be fixed and is it under warranty conditions?If not how much is the price to change the screen?Thanks
User damage is not covered by warranty unless you have Applecare +
assuming you do not, the out of warranty exchange price for an iPhone 4 is $149,exchange at an Apple Store genius bar
iPhone 4 are not repaired they are exchanged -
Condition type maintained in Value basis
Hello,
Iam maintaining the ZADC condition in Pricing procedure for AED purpose...
Now at present we are maiantaining the this condition in 4% (Maintaining the condition type as percentage basis).
Now we are planning to maintain this condition in Value basis.... how to set this condition to take this as value not percentage.
Regards
sapman manhi
go to M/06 here select ur condition ZADC
in calculation type u will see % remove it and gove fix value and save
befor doing this try to make all pos clear so it will not affect the other pos made earlier
hope it help
regards
kunal -
Duplicate condition type in contract header
Dear Experts,
In contract (VA43) header, i am getting duplicate Condition type (zcondition type). This condition type is not duplicate at Item level.
Also at header level where dupluicacy is there, it has both Statiscal indicator marked and unmarked rows. No access sequence has been assigned for the condition type.
My requirement is there should not be duplicate condition type at header level. Find below screenshot for the same.
Please guide me what should be the required steps to rectify the error.
Best Regards,You can also create conditions at header level, however, these can only be discounts or surcharges. These master conditions are used by Pricing in SAP Enterprise Buyer to determine a gross price. For details, check SAP help at
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm30/helpdata/en/ee/d9df3bbcce4b37e10000000a114084/content.htm
The following thread might be useful to you as well Pricing Condition in Contract -
How to change condition type data on header of a sales order
Hi Guys,
I have a requirement, where i want to change the value of particular condition type at header lever of sales order.
How to do it.If i am not wrong , this can be achived by CRM ORDER MAINATAIN .But how to do it i dont know.
So please help me for this requirement
Regards
PGHi PG,
Can you please let me know if you were able to do this. I have a similar requirement where in I need to change the value of a condition type.
I am new to CRM , so it will be great if you can please explain me the steps.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Vivek -
Condition type in PO header can be divided in each PO item condition
Dear all,
I would like to do as below:
In PO:
Item detail:
Material A, Qty = 200
Material B, Qty = 300
Header:
Condition tab: Condition type = Z001 (Freight charge) = 15,000 $
After that the system auto calculate and update the condition type in Item Condition:
- Material A, Condition type = Z001 (Freight charge) = 15,000 / (200+300) * 200 = 6,000 $
- Material B, Condition type = Z001 (Freight charge) = 15,000 / (200+300) * 300 = 9,000 $
Can I do that?
How I can configure the system?
Thanks a lot for your support!
Rgds,
CHyes, this can be done.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/en/dd/56177a545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm -
Condition type maintained with wrong tax code
Hi,
Is there any possibility to change Tax code for a condition type,Invoice is created but no accounting document generated.
PradeepHi,
As accounting document is not generated during Invoice creation,on checking through VFX3 we get message as below,
No taxes on sales/purch.are allowed for account 701031 3750, SJ is not allowed.
Once we get into FS00,for the company code 3750 and for the G/L 701031,we make tax category as " * ".
Now accounting document gets generated.
As this is not tax condition type and why should i maintain tax caegory as " * " for that G/l.
Pradeep -
Condition type PB00 and PBXX, coming in the same PO Item
Hi,
In the PO (created with reference to Outline Agreement), condition types PB00 and PBXX are coming in the same line item.
In the PO output, the PB00 value is also showing up and PBXX value is also showing up. User entered PBXX value as 350000 dollars which is right, however system is picking 1.2 million dollar of PB00 from outline agreement which is not intended here. As a result of that the output going to Vendor is exceeding more than 1.2 million dollar instead of 350,000 dollars. I cannot change or delete any othe condition types.THis is a production problem.
Has anyone faced this problem. I appreciate your reply in advance.
Thanks,Well, thanks Saurav and Prabhakaran, however the problem still stays.
The contract is created for services (1 lot), so the dollar amount can vary depending upon the service rendered by the consultant.
That mean user will only enter the service amount.
Saurav, system should not copy down PB00, it should come by itself when user enters the specific amount. And it comes from contract. PBXX should only appear if there is no PB00 maintained in the contract. This is not the case. The service amount is maintained in the contract. Also, I don't think that PBXX and PB00 should come in one line item together as normal system behaviour & as a normal business process too. Moreover, it is not happeniing in the other two line items - line item 20 and line item 30 are fine. The pricing analysis shows both the conditions as found - PB00 and PBXX, so I could not take any clue from analysis too.
Prabhakaran, system is only behaving incorrectly for line item 10. It is behaving as expected (good ) for other line items and other PO's. So, we cannot touch the pricing procedure as that will affect other line items.
Regards -
Condition type determined but net value of the item is zero
Hello guys
In one of my sales process I have a single condition type assigned to the pricing procedure, when I create a sales order then system is determining value of that condition type but system makes the net value to zero. Any help would be highly appreciated.
Regards
Javed IhsanHi Javed,
The reason for the same could be that
1. the conditions is statistical
2. The net value can only be seen at the header if you have maintained the net value as one of the line items in the pricing procedure.
Kindly check.
Hope this help.
Reward with points if helpfull !!!!!!!!
Regards,
Rekha Dadwal
Maybe you are looking for
-
Is there a way to get a version of the Garage Band app that runs on version 5.1.1? I have an iPad 1 and can't get any higher iOS. The App store is telling me that Garage Band only runs on iOS 7.
-
Hi, I would like to do the following: During the creation of a sales order I want to create a new text on item level. The textlines are build by ABAP-Code. I though I could do this inside the text determination with a special data transport routine.
-
Hi, I have created interactive adobe form in webdynpro for ABAP. When i execute the application it is showing PDF in browser. But i could not able to input any value in it. For example, i want to input the name and when we click on submit it should s
-
HT201364 I am unable to download a purchased copy of lion or moutain lion
I am unable to download my copy of lion or moutain lion in order to upgrade my 2006 macbook!
-
Two Fatal Error Messages when Starting Photoshop
When I tried to start Photoshop CS6 Extended 64 bit today (out of the blue) I received two error messages and the program would not open: 1. Could not load actions because an unexpected end-of-file was encountered. 2. Could not initialize Photoshop b