Adding Variant in Header Level in the Sales Order

Field "Card Verification Value" (CVV) is part of the Standard from Support Package SAPKH47028 onwards. But if you like you can use a variant for screen SAPMV45A4440 and set
field "Card Verif.Code" to invisible in this variant.
This is the reply from SAP after implementing the new support pack. Now there is an additional field in VA01 that I am trying to remove.
I can add the variant in Table Settings but that is on Item Level in the Sales Order (VA01). How do I do it in Header Level?

Hi,
Go to SHD0 ,write down the Transaction code , transaction variant then go to Tab " With Processing'.
Now you will be in T Code VA01 ,press enter and you will get all the variants maintained in Header Level.
Now you can activate / deactivate as per your requirement.
Best Regards,
Ankur

Similar Messages

Tree OOPS ALV - Need to display header & items of the sales order in oops

HI,
I need to display some of the header fields of the sales order & items in the oops alv, could you please let me know how to achieve this. I know FM - 'REUSE_ALV_HIERSEQ_LIST_DISPLAY' but how to achieve this through oops alv.
Thanks

it is not possible with that function in OO .
you can try with class cl_salv_hierseq_table
Just check this Rich's article
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b0f03986-046c-2910-a5aa-e5364e96ea2c
if you don't want that then you may have to use ALV tree.

Incompletion log Profitability Segment at item level in the Sales Order

Hello Sapians,
We recently activated the "Sales Order value flow to COPA". When we create the Sales Orders the Profitability segment for the item is getting picked up automatically and have no issue in saving the Sales Order.
But when we edit the Sales Order and then try to save it, Sales Order has incompletion log which is leading to Profitability segment in the item level.
When I click the little box in Sales Order Item > Account Assignment tab> Profitability Segment forward arrow--> "continue" or "derivation" in the populated screen, then the Forward arrow in the profitability segment is deriving the characteristics, then system lets us to save the Sales order with out any incompletion log.
I checked the OSS notes 114520, in this OSS note, my sitiuation is exactly first point but could not get any clue how to resolve automatically.
Why it is happening only when we edit the Sales Order? How to update bulk of Sales Order automatically?
Any inputs?
Thank you.

Hi
Since you have activated the Sales order flow to COPA, any change in the sales order triggers a Prof Segment redetermination.... Thats why you are able to save it once you redetermine the Prof Segment....
Ideally, if no Chars like Plant/Org Elements/etc are changed - It need not trigger the Prof Segment redetermination...
Refer Note 729381 - When is a profitability segment supposed to be determined?.... With ref to this note, raise an OSS msg to SAP and check if it is possible to avoid the redetermination of PSG as long as none of the relevant chars are changed in the sales order....
There is a similar issue in MTO where by, even if you change the Header text of sales order, it triggers the Sales order cost estimate.... SAP provided a note to stop this... Note 1548608 & 1260868.... Your case is similar to this.... Raise an OSS to SAP and ask them if they can provide such a note for your case.... I feel, it should be possible for SAP to give this!
br, Ajay M

Erroneous Shipping Header Text in the Sales Order

Hi ,
We are facing one problem.Can you please help us..
We seemed to have a recurring issue in SAP Production wherein an erroneous shipping text and supply location header text
suddenly appears on the sales order header text.   As of this stage, our interim solution is to manually clear the erroneous text via invoking
the SAVE_TEXT command directly in Production to clear out the text.   The problem with this approach is that we are "reactive"
to the event meaning we only get to know of the issue after the National Order Centre reports the issue and by the time it reach
IT it already affected quite a few sales and stock transport orders.
I
a) an investigation to be conducted as to identify the root cause of this issue
b) permanent solution to be put in place to rectify the issue
here's the text ID that got affected
Text ID = Z022 (Shipping Text)
Text ID = Z029 (Supply Location)
Language = EN
Text Name = XXXXXXXXXX
Text Object = VBBK
a list of programs that calls SAVE_TEXT and updates
the above-mentioned text ID. We have gone through the SD user-exit MV45AFZZ.
The sample you see below is an STO. As you know the STO is created inside the sales user-exit and uses the
shipping instruction default from the originating sales order to pass on the text to the STO shipping text.
We are unable to re-create this issue so this sorts of adds a layer of complexity.
I found SAPLSTXD memory id..It is importing from this id..But there is no export in the program..
Can you please help us where the text is exporting ..We need to find out the root cause of this issue and solution..
Thanks in advance.
Satish kumar.

I found SAPLSTXD memory id..It is importing from this id..But there is no export in the program..
Chances are it is set and exported at some point, then abandoned after processing for that document...it needs to be cleared probably, since your user is remaining in the same user context and therefore when another import is executed, the text stored there is brought in, even though not for that order/document....believe you'll find this is a programming error, need to export space or clear the ID after it is used...
Check the other MV45AFZ* objects also...MV45AFZZ is not the only SD user exit...look at the inlcudes (named like mv45afz* ) in SE80 for program SAPMV45A. I can't see SD (don't run at my employer), but you might also check copy requirements in transaction VOFM entries? Some of the SD wizards can advise on that part.
Try ABAP Scan program RSRSCAN1, probably as background job, if you don't find in MV45AFZ* members. Sorry, that's the old program (but it might find for you). Current version is program RPR_ABAP_SOURCE_SCAN.
Edited by: BreakPoint on Sep 22, 2010 4:16 PM

Authority check at field level in the sales order

Dear all, our business requirement is the following:
only some users should be able to see the prices (including netwr, netpr,...) in the sales order depending on the authority check performed on the sales group field.
This means that for an order of sales group 'A':
a user of sales group 'A' can see the prices and change the order, a user of sales group 'B' cannnot see the prices but can change the order, a user of sales group 'C' can display the order but cannnot see the prices.
I ask you if such a scenario can be realized in SAP.
We currently run SAP ECC 5.0.
thx all !
bye Roberto

Hi
In general different users will be given different authorizations based on their role in the orgn.
We create ROLES and assign the Authorization and TCODES for that role, so only that user can have access to those T Codes.
USe SUIM and SU21 T codes for this.
Much of the data in an R/3 system has to be protected so that unauthorized users cannot access it. Therefore the appropriate authorization is required before a user can carry out certain actions in the system. When you log on to the R/3 system, the system checks in the user master record to see which transactions you are authorized to use. An authorization check is implemented for every sensitive transaction.
If you wish to protect a transaction that you have programmed yourself, then you must implement an authorization check.
This means you have to allocate an authorization object in the definition of the transaction.
For example:
program an AUTHORITY-CHECK.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT <authorization object>
ID <authority field 1> FIELD <field value 1>.
ID <authority field 2> FIELD <field value 2>.
ID <authority-field n> FIELD <field value n>.
The OBJECT parameter specifies the authorization object.
The ID parameter specifies an authorization field (in the authorization object).
The FIELD parameter specifies a value for the authorization field.
The authorization object and its fields have to be suitable for the transaction. In most cases you will be able to use the existing authorization objects to protect your data. But new developments may require that you define new authorization objects and fields.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/52/67167f439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
To ensure that a user has the appropriate authorizations when he or she performs an action, users are subject to authorization checks.
Authorization : An authorization enables you to perform a particular activity in the SAP System, based on a set of authorization object field values.
You program the authorization check using the ABAP statement AUTHORITY-CHECK.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'S_TRVL_BKS'
ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'
ID 'CUSTTYPE' FIELD 'B'.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
MESSAGE E...
ENDIF.
'S_TRVL_BKS' is a auth. object
ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02' in place 2 you can put 1,2, 3 for change create or display.
The AUTHORITY-CHECK checks whether a user has the appropriate authorization to execute a particular activity.
This Authorization concept is somewhat linked with BASIS people.
As a developer you may not have access to access to SU21 Transaction where you have to define, authorizations, Objects and for nthat object you assign fields and values. Another Tcode is PFCG where you can assign these authrization objects and TCodes for a profile and that profile in turn attached to a particular user.
Take the help of the basis Guy and create and use.
<b><REMOVED BY MODERATOR></b>
regards
Anji
Message was edited by:
Alvaro Tejada Galindo

Adding same Free Goods items in the sales order

Hello experts,
We are using (exclusive) free goods functionality. In condition records you can specify the free goods that should be added to certain materials when they are ordered by the customer. The problem is this: when different materials should lead to the same free goods item, the system is creating an item line for free goods for every single material for which a free goods condition record is created. The business would like to see that free goods item lines that contain the same free goods material is consolidated into 1 item line. The reason for this is that the external service provider is charging per item line that is dispatched to them. As far as I know standard SAP does not support this functionality. Do any of you have encountered the same problem? I'm very curious if there is any solution for this issue.
Regards, Charles

Hi,
Not sure but still putting my openion,
Let system determine more FREE items in sales order but when creating order it should consolidate in one single line item with quantity.
For this write data transfer routine in VOFM
Write logic if in sales order have more items with same item category say TANN then consolidate it in one single line item with all qty.
And then assign same routine in copy control order to delivery.
Kapil

BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE Quantity in the sALES ORDER NOT GETTING UPDATED.

Hi Experts,
i am adding a new line item to the sales order with line item number and material number and QUANTITY.
by using BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE bapi every thing is geeting updated but QUANTITY field is not getting updated.
regards,
Jay Sawant.

I m using this code..
Fill Line Item Details
fl_order_itm-itm_number = line_item + 1000.
fl_order_itm-material   = mpn.
fl_order_itm-target_qty = qty.
   fl_order_itm-sales_unit = unit.
APPEND fl_order_itm TO it_oditm.
Fill the Header Order Details
fl_order_itm_inx-itm_number = line_item + 1000. "added
fl_order_itm_inx-updateflag = 'U'.
fl_order_itm_inx-material   = 'X'.
fl_order_itm_inx-target_qty = 'X'.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE'
    EXPORTING
      salesdocument            = vbeln
ORDER_HEADER_IN             =
      order_header_inx         = order_header
SIMULATION                  =
BEHAVE_WHEN_ERROR           = ' '
INT_NUMBER_ASSIGNMENT       = ' '
LOGIC_SWITCH                =
NO_STATUS_BUF_INIT          = ' '
    TABLES
      return                   = it_ret2
   order_item_in               = it_oditm
   order_item_inx              = it_oditx
PARTNERS                    =
PARTNERCHANGES              =
PARTNERADDRESSES            =
ORDER_CFGS_REF              =
ORDER_CFGS_INST             =
ORDER_CFGS_PART_OF          =
ORDER_CFGS_VALUE            =
ORDER_CFGS_BLOB             =
ORDER_CFGS_VK               =
ORDER_CFGS_REFINST          =

Conditions Tab should not be displayed in the sales order.

Dear Gurus,
My client wants to hide the conditions tab (header & item) in the sales order while in display mode.
Because his dealers should be in a position to see the pricing strucutre.
Pl guide me how to do this with transaction variant.
Thanks & Regards,
Sreehari

You can create a transaction variant for VA03 and hide the tabs using SHD0. You can also assign it to a separate transaction code if it meets your requirements.

Mass delivery block in the sales order

Hi
Is there any way to remove the delivery block at the itel level in the sales order using the mass.
I have some thousand of sales orders with the delivery block at item level.
please let me know, this is urgent requirement.
Thanks
Aravalli

Dear Aravali
If I am correct, you cannot assign delivery block in sale order at item level, but can assign Reason for Rejection at item level. Only at header level, delivery block is there.
Nevertheless, if you want to remove the reason for rejection, go to MASS, input BUS2032 and execute. There select [Sales Order Item Data] and click on Fields. Select the field MASSVBAP-ABGRU and execute. Give the required sale orders which you wanted to change and execute. You can change and save so that the block will be removed at item level.
Alternatively, if you are referring to field [LIFSK] in that case also, select Sales Order Item Data and click on Fields. There choose the field MASSSDHEAD_S-LIFSK and execute. Make the required changes and execute.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Purchase requisition got deleted in the sales order..

Hi All,
I got stuck up with an issue in AFS.
The issue is that after creating a P.O with the help of a TAB order,the user has assigned a rejection reason at the item level in the sales order.
Then again the rejection reason was removed and now the purchase requisition is not appearing in the sales order.
Now how can i get back the purchase requisition??Is there any option to retreve the purchase requisition with the help of a correction report??
Can any one please help me out..
Thanks.

Many thanks for your answer. It help me to solve the issue.
So applying note 738171, with transaction OVB5 (or VOFM, requirements->subsequent functions->Purch.requisitions) we create one new requirement, ie RV07A900, and then we apply the rule that if we have delivery or billing block, that is, VBAK-LIFSK or VBAK-FAKSK not empty, then we set an error with a code similar to this:
            da_sy-msgid = 'Z1'.    (message class)
            da_sy-msgno = '001'. (message number)
            error_exception = true.
and then the PR is not created.
Regards.

Complete delivery indicator in the sales order header level

my order quantity is 10 and having the complete delivery indicator in the header level
Complete delivery indicator in the sales order header level
when i am doing the partial delivery i got below error
Delivery quantity is less than quantity of 10 PC assigned to batches
this is warehouse linked.
Please let us know how to do the partial delivery.
when i click on the bacth icon to reduce the quantity it is greayed out.
is there any posiblity to reduce the quantity in the transfer order
Please do the needfull
thanks
Raju.

Hi
Usually this Complete delivery indicator flow from Customer master data. you need to change this data in Customer Master
Sales Area Tab under Shipping view Remove the Complete delivery indicator, also in Partial delivery per item keep the field Blank ( Partial deliveries allowed )
I hope this will solve your issue
Award if useful to you

Want to know the sale order report for Delivery bclok at header level

Dear,
i would like to know some reports
1). I would like to know is ther any SAP std report is available for Sale order if Blocked for delivery(VBAK-LIFSK)??
2). is ther any report for knowing the Sale order if header/item text is maintained??
Pl advice if any std report is available.
Thanks in advance

Dear Pradyumna,
Thanks for your reply, I did't find any Header r item text in the report.
Pl suggest is there any other report is availble???
Thanks in adv.

Modification of the ship to address in the sales order at item level

SAP ECC6
Sales order. Transaction code VA01/VA02
Creation/modification of the ship to address at item level/Allowed by SAP when sold to ≠ ship to/Impossible when
sold to = ship to
Hello All,
I would like to set up an enhancement on the sales order.
> What we want : we want to have the possibility to modify the ship to party address at item level. Indeed, we sometimes make slight modifications to address, such as adding the words "to the attention of"
> What we don’t want : create a new ship to, to take into account the address modification or manage this modification in an item text
> What SAP allows : At item level (as at header level) SAP allows you to modifiy the ship to address when the sold to ≠ ship to. BUT, SAP forbids the modification of the ship to address when the sold to = ship to
Is there a means on the customizing to authorize these modification address at item level each time the sold to = ship to ?
Many thanx
Best regards
Vincent

sold to party=ship to party
goto item and tab partner
select partner function ship to party, again enter same code and press enter
now see item partner automaticlly selcted.
now double click on ship to party and change addrss etc accordingly.
Hii Vincent,
It is possible to change address of shipt to party at item level and it doest matter if sold to part & ship to party are same or different at header level.
Please see above images.
All you have to do is to select ship to party again in item tab-partners and enter code.
Please check item you are using is activated for business data.
Regards,
Nouman

Unable to change requested delivery date in the sales order at item level.

The issue is when I create order with one material (linked to network and project is created automatically in the background), I am able to change (in change mode) req delivery date for an item, but when I create order with 2 materials (linked to network and project is created automatically in the background), I can not change (in change mode) the req delivery date of any item. Req delivery date is then copied from the header req delivery date.
Is this a standard SAP functionality or a defect?

Req del date is the date requested by customer and can be changed at item level. Probably the confirmed date in the schedule line is derived from the network scheduling after ATP check. (ATP check is not activated in this case)
I am able to change the req del date at item level if there is only one item (Linked to network) and not when there are two line items (Both are linked to 2 diff networks belonging to same project)
I tried to change the date in the network, scheduled and saved but that didnt change the date in the sales order. On the contrary, if I run ATP check, netowrk dates get back to original dates derived from sales order.

How to restrict header text changes in sales order level

Dear Experts,
how to restrict header text changes in sales order level change mode
thanks

Hello Chandu,
how to restrict header text changes in sales order level change mode
In order to restrict changes to Sales Order Header Text, the appropriate User Exit would be USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_TVCOM_H. With the help of ABAPer, you can include the simple logic on the basis of Header Text type such that whenever any changes are incurred on the Sales Order header text, updates would be prevented.
Please try out this approach and let us know your latest observation on this issue.
Regards,
Sarthak

Adding Variant in Header Level in the Sales Order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for