PO confirmation in SUS not happening
Hi All,
We are working on MM-SUS configuration for classic scenario.
After PO creation in R3 system , when a vendor logs in to SUS to respond to this PO , he is able to create a PO response but this PO response is only created in the web url of vendor. It is visible in the sxmb_moni of SUS system but not in that of XI system.
What should we do so that this PO response from SUS eventually reaches the R3 system?
There is an XML message(PO confirmation) to be seen in SUS in sxmb_moni but how do we transfer this XML message out of SUS into R3?. The XI scenario is perfectly configured to send the PO response.
Do let us know if we are missing some settings.
Thanks
Nikhil
Edited by: Pbponikhil on Mar 8, 2010 1:55 PM
Nikhil,
ORDRSP is the IDOC you need for PO Response in ECC. From your description it appears that the SUS has sent the message correctly to XI. I would check first on XI box SXMB_MONI to see if it processed correctly and an IDOC has been sent to ECC. Also, check in ECC if the ORDRSP IDOC came in and failed.
SG
Similar Messages
-
PO Confirmation from SUS is not going to R/3 throu Xi.
Hi Experts!
We are having an issue in SRM implemented with SUS for vendor administration, and Xi to comunicate both.
Basically this issue appears when we create a PO in R/3, then it goes to SUS to be handled by vendors, it means they confirm this PO, so when it was confirmed it backs to R/3. This step is not working, the confirmation in SUS is generated but it is not replicated in R/3. We think there is an issue between SUS and R/3 communication when vendor press confirm. This "between" is the Xi interface. Does anybody know some tips to check here? Does exist any RFC executed here? Can you give me some horizont on this? Thanks in advance!warning messages should not be problem , they will not stop the xml message generation in the sus system..
get in to the details of the purchase order --> on the sus side UI --> and you can see place where there will be text
Requested Follow-On Documents .
what all do you see for the purchase order which you say is having problem..
and also check out the following -->
1) start transaction se37
2) type in BBP_PD_SUSPO_GETDETAIL
3) and execute the function module --> using F8
4) in the object id field > enter the sus purchase order number> and press F8
5) look for the table --> E_HEADER_REL
6) how many entries --> do you find there? --> look for second entry if there is --> specifially look for field --> OBJID_B.
7) that is the number of the purchase order response the sus system has send out...
let me know if the number is filled or not.... -
Contexts: I am very competent with GFX and have worked on many projects.
When dragging an image onto a fresh canvas, the resizing feature presnaps the image into the canvas size. I can confirm that this has not happened to me in previous projects. I've also tested this problem by making a new larger document size and dragging in the same render. It snaps again. I don't want to re-size from the canvas dimensions, I want to resize from the render's original dimensions.Ap_Compsci_student_13 wrote:
ok sorry but doesn't sscce say to post the whole code?the first S is Short, and yes, it needs to be all the code needed to illustrate the problem and let use reproduce it. If you were developing a new Web framework, your example might be short, but for a student game it's very long. -
Partial quantity confirmation not happening in BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDA
Hi,
I am using bapi BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2 to create sales order.
1)Suppose my order quantity is 5 and my ATP quantity is 3 , The partial confirmation is not happening.
2)However if my order quantity is 3 and my ATP quantity is 3 , Confirmation is happening.
However when i manually create sales order for scenario 1 confirmation is happening for 3 quantity out of 5.
Pls let me know if i am missing any setting.
With Regards
Tausif ShaikhHello,
ORDER_ITEMS_IN-PLANT = TAB-PLANT.
ORDER_ITEMS_IN-STORE_LOC = TAB-STORE_LOC.
ORDER_ITEMS_IN-TARGET_QTY = TAB-TARGET_QTY.
APPEND ORDER_ITEMS_IN.
ORDER_SCHEDULES_IN-ITM_NUMBER = TAB-ITM_NUMBER.
ORDER_SCHEDULES_IN-REQ_QTY = TAB-TARGET_QTY.
APPEND ORDER_SCHEDULES_IN.
Regards
Waza -
Euro conversion is not happening in Excise invoice
Dear SAP Gurus,
When I am creating excise invoice for export order, the conversion maintained in OB08 for USD is happening in INR but the same is not happening for EURO. The EURO conversion is also maintained in OB08.
When I am creating Sales order, the warning message is coming that 'Pricing/euro: Attention: Euro Customizing not maintained'.
Kindly help me to sort out this problem.
With Warm and Kind Regards
BHIKSHAPATHIHi
go to transaction cose EWCF and select Confirm euro currency Customizing and execute.
hope this will solve ur problem.
do revert
regards
chander -
Document splitting not happening in New G/L
Hi
I have done all the below settings for document splitting.But still document splitting is not happening for vendor.For example,I am posting the following entry.
Using FB60 Tcode
Cr Vendor 100
Dr G/L 60 (cost center 1)&(Profit center 1)
Dr G/L 40 (cost center 2)&(profit center 2)
when simulating I am expecting vendor entry also to be split and shown as
Cr Vendor 60 (profit center 1)
cr vendor 40 (profit center 2)
Dr G/L 60
Dr G/L 40.
But it is not spliiting Vendor.It is showing vendor as 100 but splitting the 60&40 to the ZERO balance clearing account( as configured in ZERO balance clearing account step.)
why is vendor split not happening/Is there any thing I am missing?
Config steps done are as below.
The Steps to follow are:
1. Classify G/L Accounts for Document Splitting
2. Classify Document Types for Document Splitting
3. Define Zero-Balance Clearing Account 4. Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting
5.. Activate Document Splitting
thanksHi thanks all.
Sorry,I am new to new G/L concept and document splitting.Can you please check my following settings and confirm if they are fine.(I am doing in plain IDES system).
1.Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting>classify G/L Accounts for document splitting>>
I have classified G/L Expenses accounts which I am using under tcode FB60(for simulation of document splitting) with category as 20000 u2013expense.Also I have given Vendor reconciliation account under category 01000-balance sheet account?
Please clarify how the G/L accounts classified here?
2. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting> Classify FI document types for splitting.
Many standard documents are defined.But I thought since I am using FB60 tcode it used doc type KR so mentioned mentioned transaction as 0300 and variant as 0001 -Vendor invoice
3. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting>>Define ZERO balance clearing account
Here standard system has account key 000(standard account for ZERO balance) with PK40/50 and G/L account for my chart of accounts is mentioned.
4. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting >>Define splitting characters for G/Lu2019s
Here I have mentioned Profit center field (ZERO balance ticked)&mandatory field ticked.no other fields defined.
5. Financial accounting(new)>G/L accounting (new)>Business transaction>Document splitting >>Edit constants for non assigned processes
Here I have added my controlling area and left profit center field as blank.
Please check above settings and suggest me if I am missing any thing?All I am trying to do is post a simple test entry using FB60 and show the document splitting based on just profit center.
regards -
Automatic clearing not happening while doing invoice cancellation
Hi All,
When I reverse a billing document [normal invoice], the accounting document which gets generated is not getting cleared with the previous accounting document. The accounting document type in both original and reversal is u2018DDu2019. I have also checked the reversing document type settings in OBA7.
The above scenario is working fine with one company code [ABC], but with other company code [XYZ] the auto-clearing of accounting documents is not happening. The sales document types in both the cases are same.
On further analysis, I found that the reversal accounting document is having posting key 11(credit memo) instead of 12(Reverse invoice), but in other company code[ABC] the posting key is appearing correctly in the reversal accounting document i.e. posting key as 12.
Can you please confirm if this happening due to incorrect posting key? Also kindly suggest how this can be corrected?
Thanks in advance.
Dheeraj TolaniDear,
When I post the reverse billing, this message info me:
Automatic clearing of billing document and canc. doc. 90601784 not poss.
Automatic clearing of billing document 90601783 and canc. doc. 90601784 not poss.
Message no. VF208
Diagnosis
The system cannot clear billing documents and cancellation documents
because, for example individual item updating is deactivated.
System Response
The billing document can be created.
Procedure
The FI documents are cleared manually
of curse, this message only occurs in company 1500, and in the other company 2000, the reverse billing can automatic clearing, and have nothing message occurs. -
Dealer's ECP payment not happening correctly in Biller Direct
Here the problem is Sometimes Dealer's ECP payment made in Biller Direct is more than Dealer authorized. Also more than the 'Confirmation of payment' from BD
OR
sometimes its not happening at all.
Do you have any idea on this.
I got a mail from client which says
"There is an example in the production environment which the customer selects to refund a credit memo, and it's now stuck in the "In Process" status."
how can i check this example???thanks its done
-
hi all,
i am using oracle enterp. linux 4 (64bit) - oracle 10.2.0 (RAC) ...
ocr backup is not happening automatically. ocrconfig -showbackup is not listed the backups. and there is no backupfiles available under CRS_HOME/cdata/crs
any idea, to start the automatted ocrbackup.
thanksHi ,
Can you please also check the OCR backups on other nodes? and confirm whether the behavior is same on others also.
OCR Automatic backups are taken by only the master node and not by the all the nodes
So it is possible one of the other node is master and backups are taken on other node.
Also
The file $CRS_HOME/cdata/cluster1/temp.ocr is owned by root and oracle user does not have permission over it.
This looks like bug:5893629 fixed in 10.2.0.4. Checkout Note:5893629.8 for more details.
Delete the temp.ocr and check if the backups are getting generated.
Please refer to
https://support.oracle.com/CSP/ui/flash.html#tab=KBHome(page=KBHome&id=()),(page=KBNavigator&id=(bmDocType=COMTHREAD&bmDocID=39679&viewingMode=1143&bmDocTitle=Automatic%20OCR%20bakcup%20issue&from=BOOKMARK&bmDocDsrc=COMMUNITIES))
Regards
Rajesh -
Overdelivery tolerance- confirm quantity (allocation) not getting updated
Hi All
I have a strange problem......could this be a gap with the SAP program
I am using over and under delivery tolerance (say 10%) in the customer master - sales - shipping tab. Now i create a order with
Order qty 1100
confirmed qty 1100
delivery qty 1200 (since we have maintained 10 % over delivery tolerance)
Now i want to update the order to 1200 for two reasons
1) to keep the order in sync with delivery
2) to update the allocations (this is because we have Allocation activated and not ATP at schedule line level)
So when i go into the order and update the line to 1200 the following happens
Order qty 1200
confirmed qty 1100 (not updated)
delivery qty 1200
So my confirm qty is not getting updated to 1200 and hence my allocation tables are not getting updated. The same is getting updated when we have ATP at schedule line level. Could this be a gap with SAP that i dosent update allocations in this scenario.
The reason it dosent confirm is that it assumes that the delivery is completed and since we have tolerance maintained it assumed to be a good scenario.
Please help.
Vikas
Edited by: Vikas BhumiReddy on Oct 28, 2009 5:27 PMI am also facing the same issue. Have you found out any solution regarding this.
-
In IE8m 7, 6, this error occurs. Instead of allowing the registrant to correct the mis-matched password, BC submits the form and places this in the submission report: ERROR: Your password and confirmation password do not match. [******] - has been ignored.
The user doesn't get logged in (obviously), however BC creates a record for this user, but without a password.
Has anyone else received this error?
The process happens like this, user completes form, which includes password|confirm password in which the confirm password is mistyped, when "submit" is pressed, the modal window appears indicating a mismatched password. The user clicks "okay" and then the page redirects to the submission page (or to a login screen if the form is set to redirect to a specific page).
This occured during the test phase and has been replicated!Can you please insert that form onto a blank page with no template around it and test it? There seems to be a problem in javascript validation.
It's this line:
if(why != ""){alert(why);return false;}
So, when you click submit, the JS pops the alert if "why" varaible is not an empty string and then returns false, which means the form should not get submitted. However, on your form the browser goes on to this line and submits the form:
if(submitcount50254 == 0){submitcount50254++;theForm.submit();return false;}
I can't exactly pinpoint the problem, but it's in that code or some code interfering with that code.
Cheers,
-mario -
how can I save a jepg file in lower case letters? I check the use lower case box in preferences but it's not happening. PSCC
Let's try a preferences reset: (Windows)
Press and hold Control - Shift - Alt immediately upon cold-starting Photoshop. If you get the keys down quickly enough - and you have to be VERY quick - it will prompt you to confirm deletion of your established preferences, which will lead to them all being set to defaults. -
Confirmation Control Key not transfered to backend
Hi All,
I have a problem for SRM POs. We have a particular Confirmation Control Key(CCK) configured for a vendor in the vendor master.
Whenever a PO is created in SRM and transfered to R/3 this value needs to be populated in the R/3 PO as well. However this is not happening for all the POs.
A few POs are having the CCK and few dont have it. Any idea why?
Regards
ZubairHi Zubair,
Check the following threads which might help you in resolving your issue.
Confirmation Control Key
Re: PurchOrder <PO number> : Enter Conf. Control
If the CCK is not maintained in vendor master it would be maintained in Configuration. If not check the purchase info record or the contract reference.
This might be the reason why for some vendor P.Os its coming and for some its not coming.
Check the same and let us know in case of any further clarifications.
Regards,
Teja -
Availibility check not happening after credit block is removed for order
Hi All,
When we are removing the credit block on a sales order through report RVKRED09, the availibility check is not performed again because the qty in sales order is not confirmed.
As per my understanding when the report RVKRED09 is run, the sales order is called in background and the credit status is changed and then subsequently, the user exit MV45AFZF is called. In this exit, the values in wa-ybuk-cmgst is compared against wa-xbuk-cmgst. if i think wa-ybuk-cmgst is A and wa-xbuk-cmgst is B, then it means the credit blocked is removed and the return code is 8 which means availibility check is to be performed.
However in our case availibility check is not happening since the values of wa-ybuk-cmgst and wa-xbuk-cmgst are same which is B i..e the credit block is not removed...but however the report RVKRED09 shows that cedit status is changed.
Something is happening somwhere which is causing this. could any one guide. Also what is the program name which confirms the availibility check in sales order and also what is the program name which changes the credit status for a sales order in VBUK table.
regards
sachinHi
So as per your query , you have gone with the user exit in the program MV45AFZF , so check wheather any subprogram has been included where availability check wont happen.So just take the help of ABAP;er and then check wheather any program has been included related to availability check.
Regards
Srinath -
101 movement not happening when production order got backflushed.
HI SAP Gurus,
For SKU 101 movement not happening when production order got backflushed, but 261 movement successfully happened. Please let us know any settings need to check?
Thanks and Regards,
SHARAN.Hi Sharan,
A 101 movement for the production order takes place when
- You receive the production order via MB31
or
- Confirm the last operation which has PP03 control key
A backflush is done only for the components called by the production order & not for the header material.
Hope the above answers your query.
Regards,
Vivek
Maybe you are looking for
-
Unable to print to Canon ir2022i after 10.9.1 mavericks update.
Hi, we are unable to print to Canon ir2022i after 10.9.1 mavericks update. Can anybody help to find a driver update which works with mavericks.
-
Adobe creative suite 5.5 design premium upgrade
I am installing adobe creative suite 5.5 design premium upgrade on a new laptop. I installed the upgrade and entered the serial number and received the green check. It never ask for a prevoius serial number from the previous product. Each time I o
-
Extended withholding tax problem - India
Hello I have assigned ewt tax codes in vendor master. ewt tax code on invoice posting as well as payment posting are assigned. However i am facing two problems. 1.In case ewt is deducted on invoicing, again it is getting deducted on payment for that
-
Unable to print from recently purchased Macbook Air via wireless router (Linksys e1550) that is connected Windows XP which is connected to Lexmark x2650 printer. Macbook Air is connected to wireless router and able to access internet. Windows XP pr
-
Delete in xsql:dml vs xsql:delete-request and returned rows attribute
There is a difference in the number of rows returned between using a delete in xsql:dml vs xsql:delete-request. If I issue a delete via xsql:dml and the row I wish to delete is not in the table, then I get a result with rows equal to 0 as expected. H