PO is created in the Backend Instead of PR - Classic Secnario - SRM 5.0

SRM experts,
My client has upgraded to SRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0 from SRM 3.0 and 4.6c version respectively. SRM is using classic scenario, so Shopping cart is created in SRM and Purchase Requisition and Purchase Orders are created in the backend system. In the Sources of supply tab, we will see the Vendor, Outline agreement and other information based on the Plant, Product category and Purchasing group we select in the shopping cart. If user selects the vendor with outline agreement in the sources of supply tab then Shopping cart will create Purchase order instead of Purchase requisition in the backend system.  I am new at this client’s site and client does not have any documentation about how these has been configure in the system. Can someone please help me to find out where the settings might have been made in the system to create Purchase order instead of Purchase requisition if shopping cart contains vendor with outline agreement. I am asking this question because we have another enhancement request with similar requirement but with different condition.
I will reward the points for helpful answers.
Thank you experts.
MP

Hi,
Could you checkthe foll cust link in SPRO:
Define Objects in Backend System (Purch. Reqs, Reservations, Purch. Orders).
PO is created if you set the "*" for EITHER the purchasing group OR the product category.
SRM is creating PR or PO depending on:
- SRM customizing (ex: always external proc + PR if incomplete, PO if complete)
- the interpretation of SC data by R/3.
IF your SC is considered complete by SRM (but with a fixed vendor and not a preferred vendor) the system will check if it can create a PO in R/3.
For this, each item will request a META_INTERPRETE_DATA to R/3, asking if it can create a PO. If R/3 considers this data as incomplete, it will reply to create a PR.
Usual cases of R/3 PR creation instead of PO:
- prefered vendor in SRM (and not a fixed one)
- custom checks in user exits in R/3
- error messages in R/3 (ex: O6 334 In the case of a fixed vendor, please enter info record)
To debug without debuging into R/3, you can also try the following:
- use BADI DETERMINE_TARGET_OBJECT and force PO creation
- so the system will always try to create a PO
- R/3 won't create the PO (for the same reason as in META_INTERPRETE_DATA), and will raise an error in SRM
- finally you get the real error in application monitor (SC --> backend application errors
Related thread:
Re: PO not create from SC with source of supply in classic sena
BR,
Disha.
<b>Pls reward points for useful answers.</b>

Similar Messages

  • STO and delivery is getting created in the foreground instead of background

    Hi experts,
    In return document (with reference to Work Order), When user is selecting recommended action u2018YAu2019 and clicking the u2018returnu2019 button, an STO and delivery is getting created in the foreground instead of generating them in background.
    T-code - o3o_RT02
    Test case
    Create Work Order (IW31)
    Create return document w.r.t Work Order (o3o_RT01)
    Select recommended action u2018YAu2019, save and select u2018returnu2019 button.

    Hi,
    Could you checkthe foll cust link in SPRO:
    Define Objects in Backend System (Purch. Reqs, Reservations, Purch. Orders).
    PO is created if you set the "*" for EITHER the purchasing group OR the product category.
    SRM is creating PR or PO depending on:
    - SRM customizing (ex: always external proc + PR if incomplete, PO if complete)
    - the interpretation of SC data by R/3.
    IF your SC is considered complete by SRM (but with a fixed vendor and not a preferred vendor) the system will check if it can create a PO in R/3.
    For this, each item will request a META_INTERPRETE_DATA to R/3, asking if it can create a PO. If R/3 considers this data as incomplete, it will reply to create a PR.
    Usual cases of R/3 PR creation instead of PO:
    - prefered vendor in SRM (and not a fixed one)
    - custom checks in user exits in R/3
    - error messages in R/3 (ex: O6 334 In the case of a fixed vendor, please enter info record)
    To debug without debuging into R/3, you can also try the following:
    - use BADI DETERMINE_TARGET_OBJECT and force PO creation
    - so the system will always try to create a PO
    - R/3 won't create the PO (for the same reason as in META_INTERPRETE_DATA), and will raise an error in SRM
    - finally you get the real error in application monitor (SC --> backend application errors
    Related thread:
    Re: PO not create from SC with source of supply in classic sena
    BR,
    Disha.
    <b>Pls reward points for useful answers.</b>

  • PO not created in the backend for SC

    Hi,
    I am using SRM 5.0 and i created a shopping cart.. The shopping cart is ordered sccessflly but a PO is not created in the backend system.
    I have made the follwing setting.
    The backend system definition seems fine.
    I have also defined the prodct category and the target system.
    Number ranges are assigned in the SRM system.
    I checked rz20 and did not find any errors there..
    Shold i created a docment type EC in the backend MM system??
    What else could i be missing. Please advise.

    Hi,
    You could check the return of FM B31I_INTERPRETE_DATA, which is called when a follow-on document is created in backend system.
    Try to debug the shopping cart transfer, as specified in note 1173815. Perhaps the backend return message can be helpful.
    Kind regards,
    Ricardo

  • Shopping Cart - PO created in the backend

    Hi,
    Many SC have been approved but no PO was created in the backend ECC due to various reason, I want to know all the SC which was approved and whose PO was not created in the backend, Is there any way to find it???
    regards,
    Prabhu

    Hi Prabhu,
    Which version of SRM system you are in ? and waht scenario  you have implemented i.e classic or extended classic scenario ?
    There are  OSS Notes available which have correction report in them which can gives you list of errreneous shopping cart that could help.
    please refer to below OSS Note to see if that help.
    729967
    728536
    if none of that help the logic would be to get all item guid from CRM_JEST which has status as I1111 active for those item GUID you can get the  header guid from CRMD_ORDERADM_I and the from header guid you can get the SC number from CRMD_ORDERADM_H.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers
    Iftekhar Alam

  • How may spool request can I create in the backend?...

    Hi Experts,
    How may spool request can I create in the backend? If yes, is there anywhere in the system can I set this value to increase number of spool request per user.
    Is there any condition which can prevent me create a new spool request?
    Yes all of the answer above is answered, so is there any offfical document from SAP states them.
    Thanks!
    - Anthony-

    Thx for the feedback. But, in fact, what was the real issue, originally?
    I forgot to inform you of that:
    1) [Note 193638 - Calculating spool number from file names as of 4.0A|http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/193638] (indicates the algorithm of UNIX file names). This note also indicates "For Release 4.0A, the maximum spool number has been increased from 99000 to 2000000000. The maximum number of output requests per spool request has been increased to 32767 as well."
    2) I think I forgot one of your initial questions:
    > Is there any condition which can prevent me create a new spool request?
    By default, SAP tries to append pages to existing spools with same characteristics. If they are always different, a new spool request is always created. So, you may change some characteristics so that they are identical and SAP will reuse existing spools. See rules in [Note 85318 appending documents to existing spool requests|http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/85318].

  • Creating contracts on backend - iDocs not even sent from SRM

    Hi all
    I'm having a bit of trouble configuring backend contracts and could use a little help from the experts.
    Trying to create a contract from SoCo or bid invitation results in a success message informing a contract number, but idocs BLAORD and COND_A don't appear on WE02 on the backend. Checking on WE05 on SRM, no idocs are listed, so I'm assuming they are not even being created.
    BAdIs BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS and BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE are implemented and active, logical systems and RFC destinations are defined correctly and organizational data is ok. Also backend POs are working fine. Please advice.
    Best regards
    Alvaro

    Hello Alvaro,
    for backend contract creation, there is no IDOC generated in SRM, but directy in R/3, but the function BBPV_CONTRACT_CREATE.
    If an error occurs during this function call, you should get an error message in Application Monitoring.
    You can access those monitors via the web, with role SAP_BBP_STAL_ADMINISTRATOR, or directly in SAP GUI with transaction RZ10.
    Last option: debug the process
    Rgds
    Christophe
    PS: please reward points for helpfull answers

  • PO not getting created in the backend

    Hi
    I have made settings for R/3 PO to be created once a SC is approved, but I get the following errors in the "Application monitors>Shopping cart> backend application errors"
    000Creation of PO using Enjoy BAPIunsuccessful
    MEPO 085Check item number 0 in tabl
    06 010Document contains no items
    MEPO 071Item 00010 does not exist
    Note: PR and reservations in R/3 are getting created as follow on docs for SC but onky PO creation is throwing these errors. PO is getting created if i manually try and create it in R/3, so i suppose theres nothing wrong with the data as well.
    Regards,
    Amol

    Hi Sailatha,
    I am new to this so can u pls tell me, how to check and rectify it step by step. Which are the transactions used and how to do the assignment.
    Also what are the default message types to me maintained in the ALE customization. Currently i have the following messages maintained:
    ACC_GOODS_MOVEMENT
    ACLPAY
    BBPCO
    BBPIV
    MBGMCR
    Thanks & Regards,
    Amol

  • EBP 3.0. Restrict Create PO in backend

    Dear SRM gurus,
    We use EBP 3.0, backend R/3 (4.7 enterprise). We have configuration inplace where a PO is created in the backend, per requirements.  However, for one particular vendor, we need to have a minimum price limit set for automatic PO creation, due to additional charges.  One option we were thinking is to send it as a PR instead of PO and may be use an user exit for ME59 and combine PR's to generate a combined PO. We also would like to have a check on ME59 to make sure that the minimum prrice is established.  Would it be better to do this using condition types in the R/3 or would you suggest any other ways.  As for transfering it to R/3 as a PR instead of PO, would it be appropriate to use BADi BBP_TARGET_OBJECTS. If so, would one of you be kind enough to help me with the code. I am not an ABAPer and do not have one available for some time.  Any assistance would be greatly appreciated for both on EBP side and on R/3.
    Kind Regards,
    Reddy

    Hi KS,
    You can use badi to convert prefered to fixed vendor in your shopping cart.
    Thus, you will be able to create a PO in R/3 instead of a purchase requisition.
    Please see my answer here :
    Re: convert prefered vendor to vendor
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • Goods Receipt not transferred to the Backend System R/3

    We are currently using BBPCRM4.0 & SAP R/3 4.7 (extended scenario)
    For a particular Purchase Order which has a material number, We cannot transfer GR to the Backend System R/3 successfully.(The shopping cart of unsuccessfully transferred GR is created by using material)
    When I check R/3 using WE05, I can find the message "The plant data of the material G09002202 is locked by the user MRP_RFC". This must be the reason why GR is not transferred successfully to the Backend System, but I do not know what this message mean.(As you see, MRP_RFC is the user name that connects SRM and R/3. + That moment the material is not locked by any user in R/3)
    If we try to create the GR document again in SRM, the message "Item is already being processed" is shown, so cannot make BUS2203 Docs.
    To sort out this, we remove the GR Transfer Error Information in
    BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB.
    After removing the information of this error in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB, surprisingly we can make GR successfully.
    Weird!.
    Only for a particular PO which has a material, but not everytime.
    Sometimes this problem happens.
    At the first time, it doesn't work, but after removing the data from BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB, when we try GR again it works.
    Could you help me why this symptom happends..?
    Edited by: Hyangsook Moon on Feb 28, 2008 6:44 AM

    Hi Hyangsook Moon,
    The system is allowing  you to create Confirmation again in SRM because the status is not yet updated in SRM since the G.R is not created in the backend successfully.
    Since the confirmation is created in SRM and could not able to create G.R in R/3 through IDOC the system is giving you message as " Document is being processed".
    So the system is allowing you to create confirmation again once you delete the table entry.
    Hope this makes you more clear.Clarifications are welcome.
    Award points for helpful answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • Role created at the Backendsystem before Completion of RoleGeneration stage

    Hello ERM Experts,
    When a role is created through ERM and roles should gets created on Backend systems after completion of the Role approval stage/Generation stage (Action step 6-In ERM).
    But in our case Role is created on Backend system at the time of authorization definition (Action step 2- In ERM).
    Please suggest me, is there any possibility to stop the role creation on Backend system until the Role generation/Approval phase completed?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Arjuna.

    Hello Arjunab,
    When you define the Authorization Data, do you use the option to Maitain in PFCG?
    If you do then the role is created in the backend to allow you to edit the data and then synchronize the changes back into ERM.
    You could try change the paramater "Allow editing to role authorizations in PFCG" to NO in Configuration>Miscellaneous and then try create a new role, it should only allow you you define the role in ERM and then generate the role in the backend system at the appropriate step in the methodology.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Chris

  • DLU - Full name not inserted, using the username instead

    Hello,
    I'm having issues with any DLU I've created through ZCM 10.3.1 where I use the USER-SOURCE as source for the credentials the DLU must create.
    - The backend is eDirectory 8.8 SP5? (newest available for SLES 10 SP3 x86_64 with OES2 SP2)
    - The ZCM servers at the moment uses the ADMIN account to read the backend eDirectory to be sure its no issues related to rights.
    The DLU(s) creates the user(s) on the local workstation and is able to log in and off without issues. The only related error I can find in the log is:
    ZMD - No user daemon registered - Will try starting it.
    ZMD - ZenNative.StartUserDaemon(0) returned 1245
    Any thoughts on what this might be caused by?
    Kind Regards,
    Rune "TheFlyingCorpse" Darrud

    Originally Posted by Michael_Fleming
    You mean the fullname on the local Windows account is not populated? What about the description or anything else? What happens when you browse the user source in ZCC, can you read the users fullname there?
    The Full Name field is populated, with the username, cn, not the Users Full Name.
    It only appears as though the Full name that I see through ConsoleOne is not the same as what ZCC see's as the full name.
    Do you know what attribute that might be named? I thought it was straightforward considering they're both Novell products and has a history together :)
    Example:
    Code:
    User in eDirectory:
    Full name=Thomas Peterson
    cn=cpet
    User on local workstation:
    Full name=cpet
    cn=cpet

  • Does each SAP transaction iview create a log on to the backend ECC?

    Hi,
    If I put multiple SAP transaction iviews in a role, each pointing to a different SAP transaction in the same backend system, does the launch of each iview create a new logon in the backend system when using SAP logon tickets?  If so, is it possible to make it only launch a new session if one logon has already been created?
    Regards
    Cindy

    Hello Cindy,
    launching of diffrent Transactio Iview form same back end is quite similar as loged in to backend with Proper credentials and opening diffrent transaction's by useing
    /oxx(Transaction Name)
    Hope it will add to ur knowladge.
    Regards.
    Soni Vinit

  • Number of document created in th backend in the classic scenario?

    Dear Experts,
    Could you please tell me the number of document and its details created in the ECC backend in the below cases?
    1. Case 1:
    Define backend objects:Purchase requistion created if no stock available.
    Is it correct that the system will create two documents here? The first document will be Purchase Requisition
    ( from the classic scenario) and then a purchase order has to be triggered manually from the PR?
    2. Case 2:
    Define backend objects: Purchase Order if data complete, otherwise Purchase requisition.
    Here, if all the data are complete and the system directly creates Purchase Order in the ECC backend system. From the shopping cart in SRM, one can see only ECC backend purchase order, no purchase requistion. If i check the Purchase Order in ECC backend system, I donot see any purchase requistion with reference to the Purchase Order.
    Could you please help here? What are the number of documents created here? It is one or two (both purchase requisition and Purchase Order).
    Is it not a violation of standard classic scenario if only one document is created?
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan

    Hi,
    In other words in the shopping cart is approved
    1) If the source is assigned  -It will create a P.O in  the backend  (Classic)
    2) If the source is NOT assigned  -It will create a P.R in the backend (Classic) .. you have to assign a  source
    Regards
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • Most times when I import photos from my desktop or dropbox to iPhoto, iPhoto will keep the title I created for the image as the display title under the image. but occasionally it displays the filename instead and I have to go back through and reenter

    most times when I import photos from my desktop or dropbox to iPhoto, iPhoto will keep the title I created for the image as the display title under the image. but occasionally it displays the filename instead and I have to go back through and reenter the title in iPhoto. why the inconsistency? running OS 10.9.5 and using iPhoto 9.5.1

    Try this:  select one of the photos that are showing the wrong title and use the Photos ➙ Batch Change ➙ Title to File Name menu option.
    See if that will put the name that you want under the thumbnail.

  • Creating system in portal for the backend SRM

    Dear All,
    We are in the process of setting up a system  in portal for the backend SRM system
    I have tried to create system in System admin--> System configuration --.>System landscape
    For SAP Web AS Connection , the parameters maintained are:
    Hostname : <FQ hostname>:8000  ( 8000 is the HTTP port for ICM)
    Web AS path: /sap/bc/webdynpro
    protocol :8000
    But test is failing as 'An HTTP/S connection to http://xxxxxxxxx::8000/sap/bc/webdynpro was not obtained successfully; this might be due to a closed port on the Firewall:
    test details:
    SAP Web AS Connection
      Test Details:
    The test consists of the following steps:
    1. Checks the validity of system ID in the system object.
    2. Checks if the system can be retrieved from the PCD.
    3. Check whether a SAP system is defined in the system object
    4. Validate the following parameters: WAS protocol; WAS host name
    5. Checks if the host name of the server can be resolved.
    6. Pings the WAS ping service; works only if the service is activated on the ABAP WAS.
    7. Checks HTTP/S connectivity to the defined back-end application
      Results
    1. The system ID is valid
    2. The system was retrieved.
    3. The system object represents an SAP system
    4. The following parameters are valid: Web AS Protocol (http) Web AS Host Name (bhidfwao06.ent.bhicorp.com:8000)
    5. The host name bhidfwao06.ent.bhicorp.com was resolved successfully.
    6. The Web AS ping service http://bhidfwao06.ent.bhicorp.com:8000/sap/bc/ping was pinged successfully.
    7. An HTTP/S connection to http://xxxxxxxxx::8000/sap/bc/webdynpro was not obtained successfully; this might be due to a closed port on the Firewall.
    Is there any problem with the port, I doublechecked and the port for HTTP is 8000.
    If I give the Web AS path: /sap/bc/bsp  test is successful.
    Any pointers please?
    Regards,
    Arun

    hi arun,
    u may have to activate some more services in sicf
    u can follow this link what are the neccesary applicaiton need in sicf
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/46/d28dfa34bb12bee10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
    let me know u need any further information
    ravindra

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I keep the "Open all tabs" button from just suddenly appearing on my taskbar?

    There is a weird glitch that keeps happening in my Firefox browser. It involves my taskbar and happens almost every time I use Firefox. Not sure when it started, seems like after I upgraded to FF 11.0 but don't hold me to that. Anyway, here is what I

  • Goods receipt without transaction EIN (T030)

    Hi, some countries use transaction EIN. At the goods receipt system creates an FI document. If EIN is used In this document I can see the G/L purchasing account (debited) and the GR/IR clearing account (credited). If I don't use transaction EIN (as i

  • Keyboard not working correctly when texting.

    Since updating my iphone 4 to the latest software version! everytime i write a text about halfway through it if i try to press the space bar or a letter the keyboard selects a letter near it. this has only happened since the software update and it on

  • Mail trigger to the customer

    HI we have the scenario like , we create the quotation in CRM and after creation we release the quotation , after release at the time of saving the document , system has to trigger a mail to the customer that is quotation printout . So for sending qu

  • Incomprehensible Flash Error Message?

    Hi, this tiny window appears on top of Flash (I think) videos in Safari 6.0, running in Lion 10.7.4.  When I click on the "don't" symbol, it disappears.  I can't read it, I'm not even sure it's English.  Anyone know what it is? This is actual size, b