PO refe no at item level

Hello,
When we generate the sales order in SNC that will trigger a Sales order in ERP also. So would like to know how we can get PO no at item level.
Do we need to do some development in SNC so that when the sales order is generated it will have PO at item level in SNC.
Can somebody guide on this?
Thx

I think you are working with RR scenario;
then SNC (RO) triger SD to create SO in ERP (not created in SNC).
PO number is not item level, it is header level, that means all the items of a PO have same PO number.
PO is created at customer system, so are you sending the PO numbers from SNC to your customer?

Similar Messages

PO item level validation if create with ref to contract

Hi
Pl help me to fulfill the following client requirement:
When user create the PO with ref to contract , system fetch the all data from the contract to PO at line item level, but in the PO, user is able to change the contract line item rate.
Now contract line item rate is already fixed with vendor & PO creator should not allowed change this rate.
Could you provide the any standard configuaration or development to restric the user to chage the PO line item rate if created with ref to contract
Pl give me replay as soon as possible as it is very urgent
Rgds
Nishit

Hi,
First you have to create a separate document type which is to be used for creation of PO referring a contract . Than define functional authorisation to buyers going by the menupath -Materials management > Purchasing > Authorisation management > Define function authorisations for buyers-Function Authorizations: Purchase Order. Here enter the field selection key of the new PO document type you created . Than check the box "Display Prices" . Uncheck all other boxes .You can check reference to Contract against possible reference Objects. Than save . Than in the User id enter the User parameter EFB and allocate the aparameter to the user . Also remove other document types of POs except the newly created document type in user authorisations. This will prevent change of price field in the specific document type.
Dhruba

Delivery block at item level in sales order,Qty should not be confirmed

Dear all
We have a below requirment
We will have multiple line items in sales order and put delivery block at item level.If delivery block is put at item level it should not confirm the qty and pass on to MRP
But if we put at header level delivery block,schedule line qty at item level are not getting confirmed.So requirements are not passed to MRP-This is correct .Working as per SAP standard configuration.
Can you tell how to activate the same for item level delivery block.if same delivery block is put at item level,it is confirming the quantity.But we don't want confirmation of qty to happen.
Can you give us solution
Regards
Sudha

We had similar issue , there will be confirmed quantity but the requirement will not transfer to MRP , We used Item category configuration ( Copied new item category assignment and it should behave as Inquiry item category)
Check OVZ7 T code for customizing the u201CDelivery Blocku201D in your sales document to block Confirmation block
Check the customizing OVZ8: if the flag Transfer of Requirement
Transfer of requirements of the requirement class should be ON.
In the sales order the requirement type is determined by the combination sales order item + MRP type.
Refer SAP Help URL below
[Setting a Delivery Block |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/93/744bf2546011d1a7020000e829fd11/content.htm]

How to create a new field for Q3 - QM notification in Header and item level

Dear All,
l
Sub: How to create a new field for Q3 - QM notification in Header and item level
Ref. the link --> Quality Notification
We want to create a new field in header level and item level.
As per the thread the solution is given below.
In the IMG Config: Quality Management -> Quality Notification -> Notification Types -> Define screen areas for notification types Then Choose 'Define screen areas' Then Click on 'New entries' button Now, select the relevant Notification Type and click in 'Enter'. Select the 'Iten Cases' register and remember to setup the Tabstrip Header, Icon, etc. Set the 'Tabstrip active' flag. Then Save.
Quality Notification -> Notification Types -> Define screen areas for notification types
WE ARE UNABLE TO FIND IN CUSTOMIZATION PATH --> DEFINE SCREEN AREAS FOR NOTIFICATION TYPES.
Please help.
Question No. 2 :
THE REQUIREMENT IS GIVEN BELOW.
We want to hide the field in Q3 - QM Notification
In header --> Reference tab --> Item (sub heading) --> "DEFECT LOCATION" FIELD TO BE ELIMINATED (HIDE)
Ref the link --> Quality notification
The solutiion is given below.
Hi Sami,
We can hide the collumns using the Transaction OQM1 and Program Name SAPLIQS0.
Lets say Defect location need to be hidden, the field TXTCDOT need to have the radio button HIDE.
Hope this will suffice your requirement.
Kindly ask me if you need any other details.
Thanks & Regards,
Srinivas.D
Hi Sami,
We can hide the collumns using the Transaction OQM1 and Program Name SAPLIQS0.
Lets say Defect location need to be hidden, the field TXTCDOT need to have the radio button HIDE.
Hope this will suffice your requirement.
Kindly ask me if you need any other details.
Thanks & Regards,
Srinivas.D
By double clicking the "DEFECTIVE QUANTITY (EXTERNAL), WE COULD NOT GET --> field TXTCDOT .
Plese do the needful.
We are using ECC6.0 Ehp3 and Ehp4.
With Best Regards,
Raghu Sharma

Dear Pushpa,
Transaction Code :SHD0 is working fine.
Please accept my sincere thanks for your sharing your Knowledge.
I am able to fulfill my
Regarding the enhancement, I have not tried.
Once I will complete, I will award the fulll marks to you.
With Best Regards,
Raghu Sharma

Delivery address on item level in Sales Order causes delivery split

Hi all,
I have an issue where our customer is sending in EDI-orders with delivery address on item level. This generates different SAP addresses for each line in the Sales Order later causing a delivery split in VL01n. Normally a SO contains 20 items where 10 needs to go to one physical address and the other 10 to another. What I would like is to only split on the physical address and not on each SAP address. E.g. 2 deliveries created instead of 20.
Its ECC 5.0.
Anyone has experience to share on this issue?
Thanks
BR
Peter

We had similar issue , there will be confirmed quantity but the requirement will not transfer to MRP , We used Item category configuration ( Copied new item category assignment and it should behave as Inquiry item category)
Check OVZ7 T code for customizing the u201CDelivery Blocku201D in your sales document to block Confirmation block
Check the customizing OVZ8: if the flag Transfer of Requirement
Transfer of requirements of the requirement class should be ON.
In the sales order the requirement type is determined by the combination sales order item + MRP type.
Refer SAP Help URL below
[Setting a Delivery Block |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/93/744bf2546011d1a7020000e829fd11/content.htm]

Sales order status "Being processed" due to "Not referenced" in Item level.

Hi All,
I am facing with document status issue.
I have the following process,
1) Main contract (without line items )--> Yearly Contract-->Billing--> Renewal contract w.r.to First Year contract and this renewals will continue until the customer cancel the order.
Status will be as below,
Main Contract                   – No status ( Since, no item category referred in Copy control)
1 Year contract                 – Being processed.
1Year Billing                        - completed.
2nd year contract               – Being processed.
2nd Year Billing                    - completed.
Config settings:
In item category – Completion rule = C Item is completed after the target qty is fully referenced
In VTFA :In item level :
Billing qty = A     Order quantity less invoiced quantity
Pos./neg. quantity = +
Please advice to overcome this.
FYI:In contract line item --> status tab.

Hi Moazzam,
Thanks for the reply..
A is : Item is completed with the first reference. i will try with this but needs to check with the business if they have any partial qty might refer for Invoice.
But, as per existing config.
C - Item is completed after the target qty is fully referenced.
Which i am doing / referring for Invoice full qty. but i am getting " Not referenced" . Request to please make me understand the C functionality.- thanks.

BAdI: ME_GUI_PO_CUST add customer field to item level

Hi Experts,
I want to add a customer field to PO item level, how to do that? the functional consultant told me to first implement the BAdI: ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST before I can use BAdI: ME_GUI_PO_CUST, can anyone show me the procedure on how to implement this? thanks in advance.
Kind regards
Dawson

Hi Dawson,
Those BADIs are having good documentation and sample code. Once gone through the documentation, you can refer below thread.
Re: ME_GUI_PO_CUST & ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST - ME21N/ME22N/ME23N
Reddy

Setting Item level access rights on sharepoint list item in ItemAdding event handler

Hi ,
I am using sharepoint 2013. I am trying to set item level access rights when a list item is added using the following code snippet,
public override void ItemAdding(SPItemEventProperties properties)
base.ItemAdding(properties);
ConfigureItemSecurity(properties);
private void ConfigureItemSecurity(SPItemEventProperties properties)
var item=properties.ListItem;
SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(delegate()
using (SPSite site = new SPSite(properties.SiteId))
using (SPWeb oWeb = site.OpenWeb())
item.ParentList.BreakRoleInheritance(true);
oWeb.AllowUnsafeUpdates = true;
var guestRole = oWeb.RoleDefinitions.GetByType(SPRoleType.Reader);
var editRole = oWeb.RoleDefinitions.GetByType(SPRoleType.Editor);
SPGroup HRGroup = oWeb.SiteGroups.Cast<SPGroup>().AsQueryable().FirstOrDefault(g => g.LoginName=="HR Team");
SPRoleAssignment groupRoleAssignment = new SPRoleAssignment(HRGroup);
groupRoleAssignment.RoleDefinitionBindings.Add(guestRole);
SPUserCollection users = oWeb.Users;
SPFieldUserValueCollection hm = (SPFieldUserValueCollection)item["HiringManager"];
SPFieldUserValueCollection pm = (SPFieldUserValueCollection)item["ProjectManager"];
SPFieldUserValueCollection pmChiefs = (SPFieldUserValueCollection)item["ProjectManagerChief"];
item.BreakRoleInheritance(true);
item.RoleAssignments.Add(groupRoleAssignment);
foreach (SPFieldUserValue staffMember in hm)
SetRightsOnItem(item, staffMember, editRole);
foreach (SPFieldUserValue staffMember in pm)
SetRightsOnItem(item, staffMember, guestRole);
foreach (SPFieldUserValue staffMember in pmChiefs)
SetRightsOnItem(item, staffMember, guestRole);
item.Update();
private void SetRightsOnItem(SPListItem item, SPFieldUserValue staffMember, SPRoleDefinition role)
SPUser employeeUser = staffMember.User;
var userRoleAssignment = new SPRoleAssignment(employeeUser);
userRoleAssignment.RoleDefinitionBindings.Add(role);
item.RoleAssignments.Add(userRoleAssignment);
Nothing is happening though... Is the event handler the right place to do this?
thank you

Hi ,
You can refer to the code working in my environment:
using System;
using System.Security.Permissions;
using Microsoft.SharePoint;
using Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities;
using Microsoft.SharePoint.Workflow;
namespace ItemLevelSecurity.ItemSecurity
/// <summary>
/// List Item Events
/// </summary>
public class ItemSecurity : SPItemEventReceiver
/// <summary>
/// An item was added.
/// </summary>
public override void ItemAdded(SPItemEventProperties properties)
SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(delegate()
try
using (SPSite oSPSite = new SPSite(properties.SiteId))
using (SPWeb oSPWeb = oSPSite.OpenWeb(properties.RelativeWebUrl))
//get the list item that was created
SPListItem item = oSPWeb.Lists[properties.ListId].GetItemById(properties.ListItem.ID);
//get the author user who created the item
SPFieldUserValue valAuthor = new SPFieldUserValue(properties.Web, item["Created By"].ToString());
SPUser oAuthor = valAuthor.User;
//assign read permission to item author
AssignPermissionsToItem(item,oAuthor,SPRoleType.Reader);
//update the item
item.Update();
base.ItemAdded(properties);
catch (Exception ex)
properties.ErrorMessage = ex.Message; properties.Status = SPEventReceiverStatus.CancelWithError;
properties.Cancel = true;
public static void AssignPermissionsToItem(SPListItem item, SPPrincipal obj, SPRoleType roleType)
if (!item.HasUniqueRoleAssignments)
item.BreakRoleInheritance(false, true);
SPRoleAssignment roleAssignment = new SPRoleAssignment(obj);
SPRoleDefinition roleDefinition = item.Web.RoleDefinitions.GetByType(roleType);
roleAssignment.RoleDefinitionBindings.Add(roleDefinition);
item.RoleAssignments.Add(roleAssignment);
Thanks,
Eric
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected].
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

Adding new field in ME21N items level NO ADDITIONAL TAB or SUBSCREEN

Hello Gurus!!
I have a requirement where I am just trying to add a new field ZZ*** at Item level in ME21N (and no new tabs please)
I got the modification key and now wat i see is that in screen 1211 SAP has some field mappings with metadata.
Refer to Include LMEMFSF0T.
Can you please help me how sud i proceed or wat can be an alternate way out to solve.
regards,
Prasenjit Singh Bist

Hi,
     Another way of doing the same is to use screen-exits for the transaction. You can use the standard enhancement MM06E005 in SMOD for the Purchasing related custom fields. You can add the fields in the screens 0101, 0111 of program SAPLXM06 to get the fields in the tab 'Customer Data' at header level and item level for ME* transactions.
EXIT_SAPMM06E_006
EXIT_SAPMM06E_007
EXIT_SAPMM06E_008
                    are the function modules where u need to do the coding.
and the fields u have added need to be included in the includes
CI_EKKODB
CI_EKPODB
of EKKO and EKPO for header level and item level respectively.
Regards,
Vishnu Priya
Message was edited by:
        Vishnu priya
Message was edited by:
        Vishnu priya

GL Account details at the header are not flowing to the item level in SC

Hi All,
While creating a Shopping Cart, first I am specifying the cost assignment details (i.e., Cost Center, GL Account) in the header and then creating the line items for the shopping Cart.
While creating these line items, the cost center which is specified in the header is populated at the line item, but GL Account is blank.
I need to populate the same GL Account at each line item.
I checked the badi: BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT to populate the GL account for line items. But I am unable to determine this header GL Account in this badi.
Can anybody help me in this regard, thanks in advance.
Regards
Loknath

Hi
The purpose of the BADI - BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT is to deal with Shopping cart - Item level data, there it contains only two tables
ITEM_DATA
This contains the most important item data for the shopping cart.
ACCT_DATA
This contains the account assignment data for the shopping cart item.
Here is the documentation.
BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT
You can use the Business Add-In BBP_DETERMINE_ACCT to specify your own criteria for determining the G/L account.
In the standard system, the G/L account is determined using the product category and the account assignment type, refer to Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignment Category.
The G/L account is then placed in field ACCT_DATA-G_L_ACCT. Then, the system calls the Business Add-In BBP_DTERMINE_ACCT.
In method DETERMINE_ACCOUNT, two table parameters are available:
ITEM_DATA
This contains the most important item data for the shopping cart.
ACCT_DATA
This contains the account assignment data for the shopping cart item.
This means that you can now determine the G/L account irrespective of other item data (or any combination of item data) and overwrite field ACCT_DATA-G_L_ACCT.
Example
For the product category OFFICE SUPPLIES in conjunction with account assignment type CC (cost center), the system determines G/L account 400000. However, you also want to take into account the company code (field ITEM_DATA-CO_CODE) when determining the G/L account. The system is to make postings to G/L account 410000 for company code 0002. So you overwrite field ACCT_DATA-G_L_ACCT with 410000.
I recommend, In future, Please read the relevant documetation of any of the BADIs in SE18 Transaction, before implemnting the same, to get the details.
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

Incompletion log Profitability Segment at item level in the Sales Order

Hello Sapians,
We recently activated the "Sales Order value flow to COPA". When we create the Sales Orders the Profitability segment for the item is getting picked up automatically and have no issue in saving the Sales Order.
But when we edit the Sales Order and then try to save it, Sales Order has incompletion log which is leading to Profitability segment in the item level.
When I click the little box in Sales Order Item > Account Assignment tab> Profitability Segment forward arrow--> "continue" or "derivation" in the populated screen, then the Forward arrow in the profitability segment is deriving the characteristics, then system lets us to save the Sales order with out any incompletion log.
I checked the OSS notes 114520, in this OSS note, my sitiuation is exactly first point but could not get any clue how to resolve automatically.
Why it is happening only when we edit the Sales Order? How to update bulk of Sales Order automatically?
Any inputs?
Thank you.

Hi
Since you have activated the Sales order flow to COPA, any change in the sales order triggers a Prof Segment redetermination.... Thats why you are able to save it once you redetermine the Prof Segment....
Ideally, if no Chars like Plant/Org Elements/etc are changed - It need not trigger the Prof Segment redetermination...
Refer Note 729381 - When is a profitability segment supposed to be determined?.... With ref to this note, raise an OSS msg to SAP and check if it is possible to avoid the redetermination of PSG as long as none of the relevant chars are changed in the sales order....
There is a similar issue in MTO where by, even if you change the Header text of sales order, it triggers the Sales order cost estimate.... SAP provided a note to stop this... Note 1548608 & 1260868.... Your case is similar to this.... Raise an OSS to SAP and ask them if they can provide such a note for your case.... I feel, it should be possible for SAP to give this!
br, Ajay M

How to set start of cycle/next planned date at the Maintenance Item level??

Hi All,
We are uploading a bulk of Strategy Maintenance Plans into the system. Each plan has multiple maintenance items and each maintenance item in a plan having different next due dates. Now if we set the Start of cycle at the Maintenance Plan level, then the next due dates of the maintenance items in that plan would be calculated on the basis on Start of Cycle (Common for all) and frequency as set in MPackages in an item Task list. Since each Maintenance item may have different Frequency and next due date, generating a call object while scheduling the plan correctly to satisfy at the Maintenance item level is not seeming possible.
Can someone please suggest as to how do I set the Start of cycle or say Next Planned Date or Last Scheduled date at the Maintenance Item level either through configuration or programmatically.We are working on an SAP 4.6C version.It is urgent!!!

hi
i think specifying start of the cycle for each maintenance level is not possible ,since start of the cycle refers to maintenance plan only .
for SAP standard kindly refer the following [link|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/94/43a968abc011d395bd00a0c93029cf/content.htm]
it is better to create one maintenance item per maintenance plan,if you want to control each maintenance item independently
regards
thyagarajan

Data Extraction (Line Item Level) FI/CO

Hi expert,
Exp:the datasource 0FI_GL_4 is Data Extraction (Line Item Level) FI/CO.
From sap help doc i kown that delta records are directly transferred to BW. No record is written to the BW delta queue.
But i run rsa7 in ecc, the delta queue list had the 0FI_GL_4,moreover,it had many records in it,then i run delta in bw side the
record is cleared
I was confused about it,why the delta queue had many records in it?

Hi James:
Please refer to the presentation below:
"Data Extraction (Line Item Level) FI/CO"
https://websmp102.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700007881242002
Regards,
Francisco Milán.
PS. Since the document is available on the SAP Marketplace you'll need an "S" account.

ALV Display for Item & Sub-Item Level

Hi Experts,
i am developing one report and i want the display it in ALV as shown below.
Item Level:
Tax Jurisdiction    state     current balance       prior balance
3900000               LA           10000                    15000
Sub-Item Level:
Jurisdiction Cd.   Posting Date       Type   Doc. no.    Amount
3902948101        05/03/2008       AR      139          30,998.00
3902948102        05/06/2008       AR      176         -56,987.00
3902948123        05/11/2008                  178         -20,987.50
3902948190        05/20/2008         AP      189          76,000.00
3902948108        05/22/2008       GL       192          45,060.50
          Account Total                        74,164.00
How can i achieve this for displaying Item Level And Sub-Item Level.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramana.

hi,
Plz refer this link for displaying hierarchical list in ALV.
http://voiceofabap.blogspot.com/2008/05/how-to-use-alv-for-hierarchical-lists.html
regards
Sumit Agarwal

Workflow - Header vs. Item level

Hello,
I am looking for some documentation / list of pros and cons of implementing header level workflow vs. item level. I understand that item level is more difficult to implement, but what are the benefits.
We are looking at two types of approval, financial approval and commodity based approval and I would like to understand more before making a decision.
Many thanks,
AR

Hi,
For your requirement,you can go for N step HEader level SC Approval Workflow.I have worked on a similar reqt and the agent determintation can be made flexible based on runtime values thorugh the BADi BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI.
Advantages of header level WF is that its very flexible.Disadvantage is that some techincal problems require application of OSS notes e.g graphical Preview inconsistent.
I have not worked on Item level WF so cant comment on that.For more info ,pls refer the foll links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/17/40a86c773d6c41801d78af1a34b90f/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/a3/a6a34098022a54e10000000a1550b0/content.htm
Useful Workflow links ->
SRM Business Workflow
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/8b/4fa9585db211d2b404006094b92d37/frameset.htm
Setting Up SAP Business Workflow
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/ee/277e3c281f1817e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Related links:
Re: SRM workflow doubts....
Triggering SRM workflow from a web-based form (HTML)
Workflow debugging
Re: Triggering an alert
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

PO refe no at item level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for