PO value should not increase from PR value

Hi
I hv a PR for an matl with the value specified in valuation tab at PR level.
Am creating PO with respect to the above PR and if i exceed the PR value in the PO..
I need a warning or error at this time.
How this can be done?
Vijay

Hi
Here the client is Project Based.
So the stock is Project Stock. So no MAP in matl master.
Still while creating PR they will put price manaully or its flow from PS.
I need the PR amt to come to PO also when the buyer change the Price in PO and if the amount exceed the PR specified value system should want to give error.
How to do this??
Vijay
Edited by: Vijay on Nov 18, 2008 10:34 AM

Similar Messages

Total purchase value should not increase beyound certain value.

Dear Sirs,
The requirement from my client is-
The total value of certain materials purchase should not increase beyond certain value.
Here vendor is not constant. Can any body help me in this respect.
regards,
Anup.

Dear Mr Anupkumar,
Please use release strategy to monitor PO value. Beside that value contract, source list & quota arrangement is other option to control vendor's activity. TQ
rgds,
nanthakumar

ER Contribution should not Deduct from EE SAL and not Display in Payslip.

Hi Experts,
I have Pension ER contribution Wage type:
1. That should not deduct from Employee SAL
2. Should not display in Payslip.
3. Amount store in RT.
What changes i should do in V_T512W_D table
Appreciate your early response.
Regards
Raj

Hi,
We are maintaining the EE & ER contribution.
EE is working fine with all the validation & deducting from employee every month.
When we are handling ER contribution that amount is getting deducted from EE sal.
So we want to restrict ER contribution Deducting from employee sal and not to display in Payslip.
Figuring out how can we handle this thru Processing, Cumulating or Evaluation class.
Kindly advise
Regards
Raj

The delivery date should not flow from PR to PO.

Dear Gurus,
While creating a P.O with reference to PR.
The delivery date should not flow from PR to PO.
Any settings are there for this

there is no planning.
this is a utilites industry.
if there is any way to do.The delivery date should not flow from PR to PO.
please share ur ideas

PO qty Should not increase PR Qty

Hi
Here the requirement is,
PO qty Should not increase PR Qty
If buyer change / increase the PO qty then the system should give error msg.
It should not allow.
How to do this?
Vijay

Hi,
Make following message as Error in +SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Environment Data > Define Attributes of System Messages > System messages
06 589 Materials/services of purchase requisition & & already ordered in full

Is there any method to stop rescheduling of the PO Need By date from ATP if there is any holiday specified in shipping calender. The requirement is to update the schedule ship date on Sales Order but the lead time of Purchase Order should not increase

We are currently not able to manage schedule ship date proposed by ATP when our warehouse is closed. For example , we would like that ATP doesn't propose any schedule ship date for the first of May , which is a non working day in France. The constraint is that we don't want our purchase need by date to be impacted by the process.
I tried to closed one day in FR1 calendar and, after testing with order management, it appears that ATP didn't propose the closed day, so that's fine, but, our purchase order lead time was increased of 1 day and this is not what we expected.
Can you help us to find the right process.
Thanks

Hi Sandeep,
when we try to Rescheduled out the PO and the request is errored out the with the error:-
Start of log messages from FND_FILE
reschedule fails
old date in planner workbench: 19-MAY-11
new date: 07-JUN-11
header: 417474
line: 605652
po number: 2049031859
shipment no: 1
The need by date/promised date in the source instance is not the same as the need by date/promised date in the destination instance.
In the source instance,
The need by date is 19-MAY-11, and the promised date is 19-MAY-11
End of log messages from FND_FILE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discount amount should not be from total amount + freight amount while pay

How can I set up the system so that unplanned costs goes to fright account ( which I think is working fine) at the invoice level but also the discount amount while paying is not taken out from the amount +freight amount. We need to pay so that discount amount comes out from only amunt-freight amount.
Please help
Thanks
Ritu

Dear All,
Any BTE is available for my req.
In validation what will the steps i have to follow.
Do suggest

UC560 license not increasing from 16 to 24

I have a uc560 at a clients place which earlier had 16 licenses and as we know upgrading to softwar pack 8.2 would result in increment of base licenses from 16 to 24 but as i already did so there were no such results the uc560 shows 16 icenses and CCA shows available licenses as 30 as can be seen from the output from uc560 and CCA:
    Period left: Life time
        License Type: Permanent
        License State: Active, In Use
        License Count: 16/16/0 (Active/In-use/Violation)
        License Priority: Medium

ok i installed winamp which uses 24bit audio when enabled, had the CAC set up for entertainment mode. and still could not get 24bit audio. i used SiSoftware Sandra Pro, and did a hardware test on my audio card. which is the Sb Fatality extreme gamer pro. andseachign through all the audio settings it only shows my sound card using 6bit audio. while playign MP3's through winamp. i have no cracking or popping noises just unable ot have 24bit audio coming from the sound card. any idea's. i have tried everythign that has been posted in this thread before i even made my first post to fix the problem. is this a known issue or something. cause it's ticking me off to have paid $45 for a good sound card and not get my 24bit audio and no dolby audio in games. And yes Sandra will show me if i am using 24bit audio as it did before i upgraded my motherbaord, and on my last sound card which was an audigy LS.Here is a link to the pict shows that the max sample bits is only 6http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3.../soundtest.jpgMessage Edited by WyckedKnight on 0-20-200704:53 PM

Balance of any gl should not go below zero

hi friends,
what is the configurations required to control a gl going below when we post any expenses.
Edited by: prashanth ragi on Jan 28, 2009 10:11 AM

Hello,
I cannot understand the requirement in which context it has raised
But, this is not the way you should restrict. DO NOT expect that every account balance will be positive (greater than ZERO) in that case your Balance Sheet is not going to be tallied.
For example all your asset balances will have DEBIT balances (Positive balances) and all your liabilities balances will have CREDIT balances (Negative balances) accordingly it is going to match. The standard SAP is also working on the same fundamental concept. We should not deviate from this basic rule.
Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Regards,
RAvi

REG: while doing PGI with ref to OBD should pick stock from one location

Hi experts ,
I have a n issue while doing PGI with ref to OBD.
1.We are purchasing Raw material Aluminium circle 1000 nos from "X" vendor & keeping stock in Main stores i.e 0001 location plant-1.
2.From there we are issuing to production line i.e 0003 location(Plant 1)500 nos.
4.Remaining stock of 500 nos is in 0001 location in under some Batches.
5.Meanwhile we are suppose to transfer the aluminium circle to plant 2 .
6.For this we are raising STO for aluminium circles 600 nos to Plant 2.
7.With ref to STO we are raising OBD for Plant 2.
8.With ref to OBD While doing PGI it should picks the stock from 0001(Main Stores) location only.
9.But the STO qty is 600 nos ,availablity of stock in 0001 is 500 nos only .
10.While PGI it takes 500 nos from 0001 location & remaining 100 nos picking from Production line 0003.It should not pick from Production line 0003 location .
11.For this system should not allow to pick from 0003 location & also system should throw error message "Deficit of QTY in 0001 location"for 100 nos.
KIndly suggest me asap.
Thanks in advance
vichu
Edited by: viswanathan seenuvasan on Dec 10, 2009 7:01 AM

Hi,
As I understand the picking is done automatically in outbound delivery. Am I right?
a)
If picking is not done automatically but manually, why the user defines the production storage location in the OBD? In this case some training would be necessary....
b)
If it is done automatically: which settings are you using? Batch determination only?
1. In stock determination (SPRO > MM > IM > Stock determination > Define strategies for Stock Determination) you can define which storsage location should be used by system, and you can assign the stock determination rule to the applications (SPRO > MM > IM > Stock determination > Assign Stock determination Rule in the Applications)
(you also have to assign the stock determination group to the material master (MARC-EPRIO))
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/d8/2f3746996611d1b5480000e82de955/frameset.htm
2. You have to use batch determination
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/25/283aac4f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/frameset.htm
3. You have to use availability check in delivery not to ship out goods for which reservation already exists (if goods are in production storage location I assume you have a PrdOrd...)
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/93/744cd9546011d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
I haven't tries this but I assume it should work...
Please check SAP online help.
Regards,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jan 1, 2010 11:02 AM
Forget stock determination. Instead of it you should use picking location determination - suggested by Laksmipathi. It wokrks fine with batch determination.
SPRO > LE > Shipping > Picking > Determine Picking Location > Assign Picking Location
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jan 1, 2010 5:03 PM

System should not creates new version when value of PO increased..

Hi Experts,
Need your help to solve this problem. When i increase value of PO it should retrigger Release strategy but it creates version first, then i have to tick completion indicator and check then only release strategy retriggers..
It should not create new version when change po
Please check below screenshot
Please help

Hi
Please reveiw the following points in note
   - 493900 FAQ: Release Strategy
      4. Why is the release strategy not determined?
     "If you use version management, the determination of the release
      strategy starts when the version is completed.
      You complete a version by setting the "version completed"
      indicator in the version tab."
   - 662993 Resetting an already occurred release
     You edit a purchasing document with release strategy.
     You change the quantity or the price. In spite of that, the
     already set release is not reset.
The release strategy works the same with or without version management
active - the only difference in case - version management is active -
is that if release is to be reset, it will be reset only on version
I hope this helsp to clarify this issue
Kind regards,
Lorraine

Sales order should not copy the net value from contract

Hi,
When we are creating the sales order,Where we can maintain that sales order should not copy the net value from contract.
Regards
Prabudh

Hi,
When I am creating the sales order with reference to contract,it's copying the net value and quantity from the contract.
But I want that sales order should not copy the net value and quantity from the contract and user can take new required quantity at the time creating the sales order.
Regards
Prabudh

In a loop if the value is negative then we should not add in the total

Hi in this we r getting the negative value in Po also if we find the negative value we should add that value in total
public BigDecimal getAvailableCreditAmount() throws EleseException {
Money total = Money.ZERO();
Iterator poIter = getAllPurchaseOrders().iterator();
while (poIter.hasNext()) {
PurchaseOrder po = (PurchaseOrder) poIter.next();
if (po.isActive() || po.isPending()
|| (po.isInactive() && po.isReasonCompleted()) ) {
//changed from getTotal() to getNonDocumentedTotal()--Sreeni
total.add(po.getNonDocumentedTotal());
//total.add(po.getTotal());
return getApprovedCreditAmount().subtract(total.toBigDecimal());
}

In the iterator which I have send earlier I am getting the Total , total.add(po.getNonDocumentedTotal()); I mean I am getting th etotal sum of the Po values in that . For some value the PO value may be negative and when I find out the totaol amount then it will be increased because of the negative value In the following iterator if the value of po value is negative we should add in the total and we should not take that value in consideration . I appreciate your time
public BigDecimal getAvailableCreditAmount() throws EleseException {
Money total = Money.ZERO();
Iterator poIter = getAllPurchaseOrders().iterator();
while (poIter.hasNext()) {
PurchaseOrder po = (PurchaseOrder) poIter.next();
if (po.isActive() || po.isPending()
|| (po.isInactive() && po.isReasonCompleted()) ) {
//changed from getTotal() to getNonDocumentedTotal()--Sreeni
total.add(po.getNonDocumentedTotal());
//total.add(po.getTotal());
return getApprovedCreditAmount().subtract(total.toBigDecimal());
}

Net value of Credit memo must not increase, but accountingdoc must generate

HI All
This is my sales- return process
Sales order has been created for
Material : Ax001:   10 Qty : Total price : 100$   Per unit = 10$
Sales order has been created : for 10 units        (sales doc number:AAAAS)
Billing has been done : 10 units for the value 100$
Accounting documents posted : Credit :100$   Debit accout: 100$
Returns sales order:
This is done with reference to the sales order
Return Sales order has been created with reference to sales order : (sales doc number:AAAAS)
Qty :1 Value of the product =10$   Material: Ax001
A manual condition type is defined to reduce the value of the actual price .. The company is planning to give only 5$ for the return material
Manual condition has been included in the Return saels order Total net Value = 5$ qty = 1
Credit memo has been created : for 5$
Accounting doc: Credit account = 5$ debit account =5$
Issue: The account team wants one more account document to be created for the original value of the product i.e 10$
The net value in the billing document must not increase, but the account document must be created for the value=10$
This is for nullifying the original value of the product from the book of accounts
Solution tried : Manual condition for the original value =10$ keeping it as statically condition type : issue: account doc will not generate if it is statically . CND ref: 100% discount it did not work the net value in the order/billing is increasing
Please let me know how to generate the Accounting document with out increasing the net value.. Using standard SAP. we can create a routine and we can do this .. but we are looking for the Standard SAP solution if any,.....
Thanks for your help in Advance
Chandra

Hi Chandra,
In your scenario create new condition type and update that condition type with accruals at control data 2 section and create relevant access sequence and update the condition type in your return pricing procedure and create new account key one for regular posing and one for accruals and take help from FI /CO to create new two accounts one for regular updates and one for accruals posting ,
in your pricing procedure mark this condition as statistics relevant it will create automatically accountancy document for reference,
Try this and let me know if you have any questions.
Regards
Nishad

"The 'charCode' property of a keyup event should not be used. The value is meaningless." Is this possibly caused by a virus?

I don't know what's wrong with my Mac Mozilla Firefox, version 3.6.8, but today, it started alerting me about an error message on the "Error Console". In every website I visit, it tells me: "The 'charCode' property of a keyup event should not be used. The value is meaningless." Is this possibly caused by a virus?
I saw a pop-up which did not allow me to click it when I scatter the windows on my Mac. I was using Private Browsing, with pop-ups disabled, but one pop-up managed to get passed my settings, and open in another window. It would not allow me to select it, so all I did was to close Firefox, and start a new session. So far, everything has been normal, I also deleted the cookies it installed.
But, I still keep seeing that "Error Console" notice under my "Tools" on the Menu Bar, and when I clicked on it, it listed errors (such as what I listed above).
Would someone explain this to me?
Thanks for your help!

The messages you see in the Error Console are mostly to assist the web site's author in resolving compatibility problems. Some of them can assist you in determining why a web site doesn't work as intended. The one you mentioned doesn't sound that suspicious, except that it occurs on many sites. Perhaps one of your add-ons is trying to monitor what you type?
To diagnose whether this is caused by an add-on or one of your settings, you could try the following:
First, make a backup of your computer for safekeeping. To back up Firefox, see [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Backing+up+your+information Backing up your information].
Next, try starting Firefox in Firefox
[http://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode Safe Mode]. Be careful not to "reset" anything permanently if you didn't back up.
Does that resolve the errors? If so, then an add-on usually is the culprit. If not, try creating a new (blank) profile: [http://support.mozilla.com/kb/Managing+profiles Managing profiles].
If the new profile works correctly, you can choose between further research on your old profile or moving key settings like bookmarks from your old profile to the new one. [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Recovering+important+data+from+an+old+profile Recovering important data from an old profile].
Hope this helps.

PO value should not increase from PR value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for