POD required as PGI quantity

Dear SD gurus,
We have a scenario where :
1. Delivery will be created for 10  UoM of Gas and filled in the cyclinders.
2. Customer will receive 9 UoM at his end, as 1 Uom cannot be extracted out from Cylinder.
3. Billing to be as per his receipt Qty of 9 Units of gas.
4. Cylinder will be back to the plant for refilling to other customer.
Subsequently a New customer will be delivered & billed with 9 MT, as only 9Mt can be filled in cycleinder.
Questions :
1. How do we process this scenario.
2. Incase we use POD process, delivery PGI will be 10 UoM  to customer, cvustomer receipt 1 UoM.
    how do we treat the 1 Uom of Gas in the cylinders, in inventory.
3. Evertime we sell the cylinders, how to keep the account of gas in it.
5. incase we want POD as PGI quanity for each delievry how do we do it.
4. How do we track the cyclinders nos.
Regards
Ashish

Hi John,
The Billing date is actuallly referred from sales order if it is filled in SO itself. In SO, billing date is filled automatically as the date of order creation.
May be if this is not filled, the PGI date is considered as billing date during invoice creation.
However I dont think the POD date can be used as billing date in standard SAP, we have to only use the user exit to fetch the POD date and use it as the billing date.
You can try if this can be enabled in the exit USEREXIT_NUMBER_RANGE_INV_DATE (Module pool SAPLV60A, program RV60AFZC)

Similar Messages

  • Decision required for sample quantity in foreground processing

    Hi,
    I'm trying to do a GR using LB11 but when I try do execute TO in background I receive this error in the log.
    "Decision required for sample quantity in foreground processing"
    Trying in foreground I have in following message: Inspection sample quantity must be greater than 0 for this processing.
    May I have a missing configuration in the strategies?
    I need to do this on background.

    I just found that the interface QM-WM was not fully configured in SPRO.
    The interface control WM-QM was not set correctly for the storage Type search sequences.

  • Material requirment show iddferent quantity than Bill.

    Hello ,
    I need help on issue, there is one assembly i.e. 4025457 which have child part 4956854. If we look at bill of 4025457 it shows 4956854 need 0.785 LB quantity. But if we generate WIP job for same assembly then in material requirement it showing 0.98125 LB instead of 0.785 LB.
    Analysis –
    1. No Customization to update it at WIP level.
    2. There is no UOM conversion factor.
    3. Usage is 1.
    Please help!
    Mohit

    Hello Mohit,
    check below reasons :
    1. I hope Bill of material for the Item was revised and updated with 0.785 LB but job was created in 10th OCT-2014(earlier) .Are you getting the same issue when your created a new discrete job now ??
    2. Please check bill of material setup separately from bill of materials window once not from intended bill of materials window.
    3. check what was of the BOM defined for 4076782 (Other component in the bill)
    Regards,
    Surya.

  • Store Procedure required to check Quantity total

    Dear Experts,
    Kindly help me in writing Store Procedure, my requirement is to have an validation on Inventory Transfer Form where i have created two udf fields in row level as A & B contains where user enter value which is calculated as A * B  that is equal to  total Quantity,  for ex. (A * B = Quantity).
    So i need here a validation check before adding this document, that Field A value multiply by Field  B value that should to be total Quantity in case changes made in field A or Field B but not update before saving this document it would result be wrong Quantity total.
    To avoid such user entering mistakes a SP is required to check whether the Quantity total is equal to Field A value * Field B value.
    Thanking in Advance....
    Regards,
    Krishnakumar

    Hi!  Gordon,
    Already there is an FMS to Calculate Field A value * Field B value and it through it's result to the Field Quantity. Now am looking to have an validation check or control that should actually check before document get saved that the value entered in Field value A multiply by Field value B  is that get tallied with the Field Quantity.
    For ex: Field A value contain figure 100 and Field  B value contain figure 200 then the Field A * Field B = Quantity i.e. (100 * 200 = 20,000). In case if the user change the field Value of A or B without updating the Field Quantity then it result in correct Quantity.
    So I need a Store Procedure that check the field value of A & B and check the product sum Field value Quantity if it matches then it should allow to save the document other wise it should print a Error message "Calculation Error".
    I hope you understand what am exactly required, so i need  your helping hands to get this Store Procedure.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Regards,
    Krishna
    Edited by: krishnaoctopus on Jun 14, 2011 2:49 PM

  • Credit Memo requiring minimum order quantity?

    Has anyone had the problem when creating a Credit Memo Request (Sales Transaction) in CRM whereby the system imposes a hard error when the minimum order quantity is not met?
    For Credit Memo's, we should be able to credit the customer either partially or fully so it doesn't make sense to force the min. order quantity.

    Hi,
    Check if the minimum order qty is maintained in COMMPR01 in Sales and Distribution tab. If maintained, remove the value and try to create credit memo.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Chandrakant

  • Purchase Order required at PGI Level in the delivery

    Dear Gurus,
    I am having the following problem: When I want to make Post Goods Issue at delivery level (VL01), the system prompts me for a Purchase Order Number.
    I have updated the stock in 2009 and I have checked that there are sufficient quantities which is the case.
    Why then the systems request such a Purchase Order?
    How can I get rid of such a message?
    Is there something to do with the fiscal year?
    Regards
    Chris

    Hello Chris,
    If you want to directly issue goods at delivery level you need to use to transaction VL01NO which is without order reference,
    You only need to specify the shipping point and delivery type LO (without reference) sales organization and relevant details and ship to party in net screen details .
    you can do the post goods issue without reference.
    I forgot to add the system ask for preceeding document based on the delivery type settings done in the customization transction code OVLK. SAP standard delivery type LO has no precceding document as its reference, so ou can use this delivery type for issuing goods at delivery level.
    Br,
    Tushar
    Edited by: Tushar Patankar on Jan 24, 2011 5:39 PM

  • Delaying billing based on POD receipt

    Hi
    Is anyone aware of the SAP best practice for enabling a delay in billing after POD receipt. This would be an international direct shipping scenario.
    Thanks
    Proof of delivery (POD) is an instrument involved in business processes in which an invoice is issued only after the customer has confirmed the delivery's arrival. In addition to the proof of delivery itself, you can also record the POD date, POD time, the actual quantity that arrived and the reason for possible differences in quantities. This is especially important for deliveries where the delivery quantity varies because of the nature of the goods or for which the exact delivery quantity is unknown from the start. You are now in a position to issue an accurate invoice based on the customer's confirmation of goods received. You no longer need to create credit memos. The reasons for deviation that occur most frequently in "real world" scenarios such as stock shrinkage, theft, certain characteristics of goods (volatility, for example), and transportation damage are recorded and analyzed in the system. This analysis is especially valuable when you are negotiating with forwarding agents, vendors, or customers, since all deviations can be reflected.

    Bill, this is standard SAP. You will have to do 2 things to activate this SAP POD functionality:
    - activate POD relevancy in the ship-to customer master (sales view, shipping tab)
    - activate POD relevancy for the delivery item categories in customizing.
    The Standard routine of copying requirements 003 - header/dl related in VOFM-> Copying Requirements -> Billing is the one that does not allow creation of invoice if POD confirmation is not received.

  • Requirement in MRP even after Sales order completely delivered/cleared

    I see a sales order in md04 even after that order is already cleared completely delivered
    I have checked the pGI quantity in order and document flow. everything matches and status is completed/cleared.
    I also ran SDRQCR21 in se38 with data transfer checked. Still I am unable to delete that fake order from md04.
    any help is appreciated.

    Hello ,
    Have you checked & followed all instructions  in SAP note 207942.
    "Generally you can solve these problems with report SDRQCR21from Note 25444. If not, these kinds of problems must be processed further in SD-BF-AC.
    However, often the problem is also caused by the fact that
    no requirements are generated at first or the generated requirements are only displayed but are not included in MRP calculation
    or vice versa
    due to the Customizing settings requirements are stored although this is not wanted from the business view. "
    This is a release independent SAP note. so it applies to ECC6.0 as well.
    Hope this helps you resolve your issue.
    Thanks,
    Ram

  • Problem in Creating Delivery  and PGI

    Hi Guru's
           My sales process is  Sales Order-- Delivery( PGI is not done here)- Billing-- (PGI is done after doing Invoicing)
          (1)  My user created one delivery for a quantity of ( say 100 quantity) and forgot to pick and assign batch in the delivery and created an invoice for the delivery. (Usually the system will ensure the delivery quantity and picked quantity is same when doing PGI and since we are not doing PGI before Billing the system allowed to create an invoice)
          While doing PGI the system is not considering this quantity because quantity is assigned and an excess quantity is showing in Stock Overview.how to correct this. and my situation is i cant cancel the invoice and assing the batch and do PGI.
        how to correct this quantity difference ?
      (2) Recently when doing Physical inventory they adjusted the quantity in the system by decreasing the quantity by said 100 quantity but there is a problem in doing new delivery( short of 100 quantity) because the already invoiced delivery is showing a requirement of 100 quantity. In order to do delivery they added that  100 quantity with same batch number.
             I want a solution for this please help me
    regards,
    Ravi Kiran
          I

    Hi Ravi kiran
    As your process is different so you need to go with the new sub-routine and you need to assign that   sub-routine in VTFL .then only the problem can be solved. . But if you are doing order related billing then in VTFA you need to maintain the item category . and also check the feild Overdelivery in 0VLP Then you can change the quantity in the delivery level
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Auto PGI for only deliveries which contain a Handling Unit

    It is possibe to setup automatic post goods issue when confirming the transfer order using :-
    IMG menu path:  Logistics - Execution - Warehouse Management - Interfaces - Shipping - Define Shipping Control - Define Shipping Control at the Movement Type Level
    Mvt type 601 - setting Copy WM Quantity to option '4' -i.e.  auto PGI
    However this would then work when confirming  transfer orders for ALL outbound deliveries.
    I only require auto PGI to work for deliveries containing Handling Units.
    Is this possible ?  I imagined it might involve cloning mvt type 601 to another mvt type which would then be used
    specifically for handling units.
    Regards.
    Phil.

    Thanks for the reply, using VL06G in background is an option.
    Is another possible option to use a Special Movement Indicator ?
    WM mvt typ 601 could be copied to a new one e.g. 610.  The interfaces table could then be setup so that Ref mvt type 601
    with a Special Movement Indicator points to WM mvt type 610.
    The issue I have is that I don't want to set the Special Movement Indicator on the Material Master (WM 1 view).
    I know it is possible to define the Special Movement Indicator within MIGO as a default setting.
    Is there something similar within the Outbound delivery ?
    Regards.
    Phil.

  • Cannot PGI one delivery in a shipment( getting runtime error )

    Dear all,
    I am not able to PGI one delivery in a shipment out of three deliveries. While PGIg I am getting a run time error saying that "cannot calculate percent for the material for this line item". I checked the condition values for that material in the standard order. Values are defined as well.The material also has serial number defined in the packing list. Transfer order is also complete. Not able to identify the reason of getting the error.
    Please advise on this above issue.
    Regards,

    Based on your description, the business process differs to our company. Our company completes the delivery with the PGI and then it creates the shipment. It is required to PGI the delivery before it creates the shipment.
    Ok, now what I am understanding is that you have created a shipment with three deliveries and are now trying to PGI the delivery. Questions to ask are: Are there limits to the shipment in terms of quantity? Are the materials the same for all three deliveries? Is the material new and has all relevant information being set up in master? I'm not sure that the percent question is related to the pricing conditions, but it may be related to the percent in terms of the its ratio to the entire shipment. In other words, what percent of the shipment does that one delivery make up?

  • How To Reverse Excess Confirmed Quantity in Process Order?

    Hi Experts,
    Good day!
    I have a Process Order with Total Quantity of 68,180 L which currently have  a status of TECO CNF  DLV  PRC  BASC BCRQ GMPS MACM*. I made my first partial confirmation with a quantity of 1,000 L for my Finished Good u2013 this is a confirmation with automatic goods receipt. Then I mistakenly made my Final Confirmation for this order with a quantity of 71,125 L for my Finished Good. I only noticed that my last confirmation was incorrect after the Finished Good in Stock has been depleted already. The 101 movement for the Finished Good that was posted during my final confirmation was not reversed anymore when I canceled my confirmation in CORS. I tried to reverse using a 102 movement type for this order in MB31 however it didnu2019t allow me to proceed and gave me an error said u201Cdeficit of .....in Unrestricted useu201D.
    Currently my Process Order has a total Delivered Quantity of 72,125 L which is much greater than the required total order quantity of 68,180 L.
    Anybody knows how to reverse this excess confirmed quantity? Your response is much appreciated.
    Thanks. Have a wondeful day!
    Rockz

    Hi Rockz,
    You mean you made Good Receipt (confirmation) excess 3,945L .
    Right now, you want to cancel only 3,945L.
    As you said, FG already depleted.
    If have no quantity in unrestricted Use, how can we make good movement(102) (because error:u201Cdeficit of .....in Unrestricted useu201D occur when you do TCode MB31 for 102)
    If you want to cancel 3,945L, first, you must reverse that Batch of FG 3,945L to Unrestricted use (MMBE to check stock), then you use the TCode MB31 with movement 102 for reverse FG excess, if this finish, quantity in delivery of Process Order will be subtract 3,945L.
    (reverse that Batch of FG 3,945L to Unrestricted use ,mean is  the Batch of FG which you depleted for somethings like fill to bottle....)
    Regard,
    DiepNguyen.

  • Minimum quantity in sales order

    Hello friends,
    Can anyone tell me how to maintain minimum quantity in sales order, (Not Minimum order quantity of material master) as only maximum (target) quantity is maintainable in sales order at Item level? So after this development in sales order, one can enter two quantities (minimum and maximum) so that sale can be done between this quantity range.
    I know this is not possible without exits or developments, but please tell if someone has came across the same scenario which exits used by you.
    <b>Required Minimum Order quantity Field in Sales Order at item level like Cumulative Order Quantity in Sales Units (VBAP-KWMENG) at proper position in Transaction-> VA01-VA02-VA03.
    Program name: SAPMV45A Screen number: 4900 or wherever it is adjusted at item level i.e. Additional Data B Tab.</b>
    Thanks in advance
    Warm regards
    Amit

    Hi Prabhu Peram,
    I want to maintain a input field can you throw some light on the same.
    Regards
    Amit

  • Using conversion rule to convert quantity fields

    Hi!
    I am trying to find a way to use a conversion rule to convert a quantity specified in one unit of measure to the corresponding quantity specified in a different unit of measure. I was trying to use 'Copy sender field' along with a custom 'Special conversion rule'. However, the code to convert quantities requires both the quantity and material number to do the UoM conversion. 'Copy sender field' only allows the transfer of one sender field. Is there a way to transfer two sender field into a 'Special conversion rule'.  Any help much appreciated and rewarded. Thanks, Duncan

    Hi Duncan,
    Try FM UNIT_CONVERSION_SIMPLE.
    Regards,
    Atish

  • Function module to retrive material quantity based

    Is there any function module which can help me retrieve material quantity for a particular material where i pass material number, plant, storage location and start date and end dates(posting period) for which i require the material quantity.

    Hi Kaushal,
        Check this lnik out...
    http://www.geocities.com/victorav15/sapr3/abapfun.html
    Regards,
    Santosh

Maybe you are looking for