Poor implementation of manifest fiels

im looking to get jdeveloper to automatically add a date line into the manifest file.
currently i am privilaged to get hte following in my manifest files
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Created-By: Oracle JDeveloper 10g 9.0.5
why can several options not be added to jdeveloper to auto compile the java information into this file.
surely it would not be that difficult to add some meta commands to fill in such items as:
1. compile date & time
2. classes /files included
3. revision numbers.
4. option to remove silly message currently included.
has anyone come across a plugin to provie this function?
steve

Hi Steve, you need to go through the docu (http://ant.apache.org/).
e.g. to create a jar with manifest (http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/manifest.html) this could look like
  <target name="Module-Resources-JAR"
          description="Creates the [Module]FolderResources.jar" >
    <jar jarfile="${DIR.JARS}/${Module.Name.Resources.jar}"
         duplicate="fail"
         compress="false"
         index="false" >
      <fileset dir="${DIR.COMPILE}" >
        <patternset refid="include.resources.bundles"/>
        <patternset refid="include.resources.images"/>
      </fileset>
      <manifest>
        <attribute name="Created-Date" value="${build.time.stamp}" />
        <attribute name="Specification-Title" value="${NAME} - ${Module.Name.Disp} Module - I18N Resources for ${language.extension}" />
        <attribute name="Specification-Version" value="${SPEC.VERSION}" />
        <attribute name="Specification-Vendor" value="${AUTHOR.NAME}" />
        <attribute name="Implementation-Title" value="${NAME} - ${Module.Name.Disp} Module - I18N Resources for ${language.extension}" />
        <attribute name="Implementation-Version" value="${BUILD.VERSION}" />
        <attribute name="Implementation-Vendor" value="${AUTHOR.NAME}" />
        <attribute name="Implementation-URL" value="${HOMEPAGE}" />
        <attribute name="Implementation-Language" value="${BUILD.LANGUAGE}" />
        <attribute name="Copyright" value="${COPYRIGHT.TEXT}" />
      </manifest>
    </jar>
    </target>

Similar Messages

  • Mail organize by conversation is very poorly implemented

    In Mail organize by conversation is very poorly implemented as this is based upon the subject line. There should be an option to set it by from address, to address. Generally I find that Apple's ability to categorise data i.e. iTunes store is extremely poor, they really need to make their search and categorisation capabilities for more advanced in the options available to a user.

    If I understand correctly, I am having the opposite problem:
    Messages with the same subject, but with different senders, are not consolidated into a single thread/conversation.
    For example, I receive many emails via a web form, where each message contains the same subject.  In 10.6, these messages were ALL listed as a single thread that could be expanded/collapsed.  In 10.7, they are now all separate messages in the Inbox (organized by "Conversation"), unless the same sender submitted more than once, in which case they are grouped together.  What used to be a neat and condensed display is now a very long list.
    I have just upgraded to Lion, and I have tried the various combinations of View by Conversation on/off, Include related messages on/off, etc., but I am unsure of whether this behavior is normal or not.
    So, here's my question:  When organized by Conversation, what is the criteria used to determine the threading?  and, can this be changed?
    It appears to be organized by Sender, but this post indicates otherwise.  I like Peter's suggestion.
    (And yes, I have already rebuilt the Evelope Index.)

  • Very poor implementation of XMLHttpRequest streaming with Safari for Window

    I hope this post reaches Apple engineers. This is critical for us to resolve this. I am a member of the developer network, so if using incident support is necessary, it can be used. Do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. I have implemented a test to compare XMLHttpRequest streaming performance for different browsers. Safari for Windows 5.0.3 had the worst results compared to Chrome and Firefox. Furthermore, I think this problem was introduced after Safari 3. The test consists of a server pushing messages of about 350 bytes to the browser at a rate of about 300/s. Once server pushes 10,000 messages, it closes the connection and browser opens new one repeating the cycle. There were several problems associated with Safari: 1) Safari could not process much more then 300 messages/s, that is quite low. Chrome had no problem processing 1,000. If, for example, 500 m/s was used, Safari would quickly allocate hundreds of meg of memory and crash. 2) Safari starts with about 64MEG of memory allocated. Once the test page is opened, memory quickly climes to 150MEG and as test progresses to >400MEG. Once the connection closes, it drops to 150MEG again. Chrome's memory did not fluctuate at all staying at 32MEG for the same test. 3) CPU was steadily claiming as test progressed and then dropped as connection was reset, creating CPU spikes. It reached about 50% CPU before connection was closed. Chrome's CPU stayed at about 2% all the time. This is the code: Server. Should be run with the latest Java Tomcat 7. Configure Tomcat to use Http11NioProtocol: package test; import java.io.IOException; import java.io.PrintWriter; import java.text.SimpleDateFormat; import java.util.Date; import javax.servlet.ServletException; import javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet; import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest; import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse; import org.apache.catalina.comet.CometEvent; import org.apache.catalina.comet.CometProcessor; @SuppressWarnings("serial") public class WebFrameworkServletXHRReconnects extends HttpServlet implements CometProcessor { @Override public void event(CometEvent event) throws IOException, ServletException { HttpServletRequest request = event.getHttpServletRequest(); HttpServletResponse response = event.getHttpServletResponse(); if (event.getEventType() == CometEvent.EventType.BEGIN) { System.out.println("Begin for session: " + request.getSession(true).getId() + " " + response.getWriter()); response.setHeader("pragma", "no-cache,no-store"); response.setHeader("cache-control", "no-cache,no-store,max-age=0,max-stale=0"); event.setTimeout(Integer.MAX_VALUE); PrintWriter out = response.getWriter(); SimpleDateFormat formatter = new SimpleDateFormat("mm:ss: "); for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { out.print("{\"messageType\":8448,\"requestId\":"0",\"eventType\":1,\"symbolId\" :[\"BAC.EA\",0],\"fields\":[{\"header\":"0",\"type\":6,\"data\":[3993,2]},{\"hea der\":"55",\"type\":6,\"data\":[1185,2]},{\"header\":54,\"type\":6,\"data\":[321 8,2]},{\"header\":"5",\"type\":6,\"data\":[6617,2]},{\"header\":52,\"type\":4,\" data\":[15]},{\"header\":"12",\"type\":6,\"data\":[1700,2]}]}"); out.flush(); if (i % 10 == 0) { try { //Thread.sleep(60); Thread.sleep(30); } catch (InterruptedException e) { } } if (i % 100 == 0) { System.out.println(formatter.format(new Date()) + i); } } out.close(); event.close(); } else if (event.getEventType() == CometEvent.EventType.ERROR) { event.close(); } else if (event.getEventType() == CometEvent.EventType.END) { event.close(); } } } client: <script type="text/javascript" src="log4js.js">
    </script>
    <script type="text/javascript">
    var api;
    var log = new Log(Log.DEBUG, Log.popupLogger);
    var byteoffset;
    var perocessedMessages;
    function connect() {
    perocessedMessages = 0;
    byteoffset = 0;
    id = 0;
    api = new XMLHttpRequest;
    api.onreadystatechange = onreadystatechange;
    api.onerror = onerror;
    log.debug('connect');
    api.open("GET", "http://localhost/Test/Controller", true);
    api.send("");
    function onreadystatechange() {
    switch (api.readyState) {
    case 3:
    change();
    break;
    case 4:
    disconnect();
    break;
    function change() {
    connected = true;
    var buffer = api.responseText;
    var newdata = buffer.substring(byteoffset);
    byteoffset = buffer.length;
    while (1) {
    var x = newdata.indexOf("<activ>");
    if (x != -1) {
    y = newdata.indexOf("</activ>", x);
    if (y != -1) {
    processMessage(newdata.substring((x + 7), y));
    newdata = newdata.substring(y + 8);
    else {
    break;
    else {
    break;
    byteoffset = buffer.length - newdata.length;
    function processMessage(msg) {
    var objJson = eval('(' + msg + ')');
    perocessedMessages++;
    //if (perocessedMessages % 100 == 0) {
    // log.debug('' + perocessedMessages);
    function disconnect() {
    log.debug('disconnect');
    connect();
    function onerror() {
    log.debug('onerror');
    </script>

    I hope this post reaches Apple engineers. This is critical for us to resolve this. I am a member of the developer network, so if using incident support is necessary, it can be used.
    We're a user-to-user forum, ilyag. So it'd be better for you to use the Apple Bug Reporter if you want to ensure someone from Apple sees your post:
    http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter/

  • Poor implementation: image bugs and PDF TOC non functional

    I have just completed my new eBook, which I made the mistake of writing in Pages 5 (latest version).
    First, the Table of Contents is no longer active in teh exported PDF.
    Second, I had an awful lot of buggy behaviour in this picture-rich book. Pictures mirroring; randomly changing pages; being swapped; losing the "keep with text" option; not being able to go where I want them; etc.
    But worst of all, when I try to go back by exprting to Pages 09, that seems ot work.. expcet Pages 09 then says "The document <name> couldn't be opened".
    I seem stuck. Any workarounds, anyone?
    Michael
    PS I already announced the new book, as I was sure I;d be releasing imminently...
    http://www.speedlighter.ca/e-books/ebook-impactful-travel-photography/

    Ok. It's 3am and I can't sleep. Peter, do you need my help with Mavericks? Mine purrs despite the name.
    I may be off base here, but do I remember correctly a post from this year or last where someone ran up against a aggregate image size ceiling in Pages ’09 while creating a book. If that condition is in fact true, and Pages v5 increased this ceiling, but fails to check for it in Pages ’09 exports, could this be a contributing factor in the current issue?

  • ICloud - objectively a very poor implementation: discuss

    Please, no 'apple can do no wrong' comments.
    We've had plenty of hype in the last several months and, seemingly, promises of things moving on significantly but really this is quite a 'half-baked' offering.
    The mobileme to icloud process tells you to use your MM a/c and then you end up with iCloud on your old MM a/c (that many of us never use) and iTunes on the a/c you had a choice about and I would guess mostly based on the email a/c we really see as 'ours'. And a transition between the two? doesnt seem so!
    And the the services of MM and what you get with iC. will iC allow document storage in anything but iWorks file formats? or even just a finder/explorer type fileshare?
    Contacts syncing yet again creates duplicates!! how many times will I have to go through and clear out duplicate records?
    Photostream - 30 days? so can we not hold our favourite photo folders in iC?
    and there's more - but overall ..... its rather disappointing.

    I hope this post reaches Apple engineers. This is critical for us to resolve this. I am a member of the developer network, so if using incident support is necessary, it can be used.
    We're a user-to-user forum, ilyag. So it'd be better for you to use the Apple Bug Reporter if you want to ensure someone from Apple sees your post:
    http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter/

  • Each Bridge update kills more features & poor implementation of updates!!

    Why is Adobe intent on killing Bridge & handicapping workflow?
    Bridge is as much a part of my workflow as Photoshop, however they keep killing useful functions.
    First the Export panel was killed off, that function saved me a great deal of time.
    Now I find every time they update Bridge or Photoshop, I lose functionality.
    In the last major update, I have lost all the tools options in bridge such as 'Batch", 'load into layers', 'Process files' etc.
    It seems I'm required to uninstall everything & reinstall it again just to get back some of the features, which seems to be a recurring theme since the introduction of CC.
    It is extremely frustrating & time consuming to have to uninstall -> reinstall bridge & photoshop every time there is a major update.

    I am having the same issue with Link, posted my response in the Link Forum.

  • E61 Calendar, poor implementation of repeated even...

    Is there a calendar application, or a way to coerce the default calendar application, to schedule monthly events by day, rather than date.
    I have meetings that occur on the first Wednesday of each month, and can't schedule that using the default application. Aquacalendar doesn't seem to do it either, though it appears to be using the same database. So perhaps the underlying database is built on too simple a model of the world. Which would seem to undermine the phone's otherwise excellent business credentials.
    Oddly, previous symbian calendar programs that I have used handled this just fine (eg on Sony Ericsson P800, and my very old Psion 5, which had the best calendar application I've ever come across).
    Why also, can one not specify an event to be repeated forever?
    Dear Nokia, please improve this app.
    Anna
    Anna Langley
    Cambridge, UK

    21-Sep-2006
    01:22 PM
    damocles wrote:
    Hi Guys.
    This board is monitored by Nokia but the best way to give feedback to us is to contact your local Nokia support:
    http://www.europe.nokia.com/A4144989
    Thanks
    Sorry, have tried again and the form won't accept my comment. Will you kindly pass my comments along to Nokia.
    By they way, another issue is that the calendar application doesn't allow one to specify an event that occurs every n days/weeks/fortnights/months/years (unless n=1) either.
    Anna Langley
    Cambridge, UK

  • Aperture Dual Display Mode Poor?

    One of the big reasons I picked up Aperture was its ability to utilize my dual display set-up, but the implementation in Aperture seems hamstrung to me.
    I have a 22" Cinema Display as my main screen with a 17" Studio Display to it's left. What I'd LIKE to do is have the 22" with a full version of a book layout (for example) with all the thumbnails on the 17". But it seems that I can't do this, being only able to use the 17" to show a full screen version of the selected image.
    I'd love to see the Aperture interface tabbed the way Final Cut Pro's is so that the various elements could be moved across the 2 displays as wanted.
    Seems to be a poor implementation. Is there a way to get better flexibility?
    Cheers,
    Joe

    Thanks all, I have come up with a temporary "workaround" just by moving the Aperture interface all the way to the left on the 17" and extending it to cover the whole of the 22".
    IF I could save the workspace, that would be OK (not great but ok).
    In the meanwhile I can have the thumbs on the 17" with the book just about full screen on the 22"
    I did try that changing the primary monitor thing and that's also kind of a pain, plus it still didn't let me see my book layout up close on the 22".
    I think tabbing the screen elements would do it, and no I hadn't seen the "feedback" link before (I got the program 2 days ago) so I will definitely do that, too.
    Thanks again for the feedback!

  • In November 2014 iOS X Yosemite had poor reviews. Have problems or idiosyncrasies been corrected?

    I have been reluctant to upload the OS upgrade from Mavericks to Yosemite until I read good reviews. One user talked about a card upgrade. Where can I learn more and what's happening now in March 2015?

    If I believed all the negative comments on this website I'd still be using my Macintosh SE/30 from 1989. I am not familiar with any required "card upgrade".
    Nearly all operating system upgrade headaches are the result of incompatible or poorly implemented third party software. Complaints regarding incompatible software or ill-conceived system modifications have arisen with every OS X version ever released. They exist in roughly the same proportion with Yosemite, and they will continue to exist with every OS X release there will ever be. Apple can't fix bugs in third party software they did not create and do not control. If you contemplate upgrading, be sure to uninstall garbage "anti-virus" and third party "cleaning" or "optimizing" apps that should not be installed on any Mac, and research your essential software for compatibility. "Essential software" specifically excludes all the aforementioned garbage, regardless of their respective developers' claims of Yosemite compatibility.
    All my Macs are running Yosemite just fine, and there's no way I would ever contemplate reverting to any earlier OS version.
    Assuming that you are already in the habit of routinely backing up your system you can install Yosemite at no risk and at no cost. If you do not routinely back up your system, you should. Obtain an external USB or FireWire hard disk drive for your Mac, then download and install Yosemite on it. You can choose to start your Mac from that disk or the internal one using Startup Manager (hold an option key while you start your Mac), and evaluate Yosemite at no risk whatsoever to your existing installation. Just be sure to designate the proper installation location for Yosemite when you get to that installation step.
    Running OS X from an external USB hard disk won't be as fast as the iMac's internal one, but it will be sufficient to draw conclusions regarding its suitability for your needs. All else being equal Yosemite should perform somewhat better than Mavericks due to various efficiency improvements.
    An external hard disk drive of adequate capacity can be purchased for well under $100 - much less than the cost of some previous OS X upgrades themselves. When you satisfy yourself that Yosemite works for you, then "clone" the external disk's contents to your internal one, or just install Yosemite directly, and use the external disk for backup purposes - which you ought to be doing anyway.

  • Poor Output from AME (Premiere 4)

    I love Premiere, but I hate the Adobe Media Encoder.  I think part of the problem may be that I am producing custom video for desktop and the web as opposed to media for DVD, Blu Ray, etc.
    I am producing a series of short 16:9  Quicktime videos at a custom size from high-res progressive source files rendered in 3DS Max.
    I have found that the Media encoder settings seem to be very restrictive with regard to bitrate settings, and that the best available quality when encoding to H.264, for example, is just plain crappy, and nowhere near as good as I can produce if I use the Sorenson Squeeze trial.
    I think some codecs are just poorly implemented.  Both of the Sorenson codecs can not be configured, and bitrate options are limited.  The resulting video is horrible compared to the same result from the Sorenson encoder.
    The animation codec for desktop QuickTime is just plain broken.  even at the best quality settings, the output is full of noise and artifacts and is markedly inferior to the output from the video encoder in Max or even in the cheap little Camtasia screen recorder.
    In order to get clean video in QuickTime format, I have tried every combination of codecs I can think of. I can't set the bitrate high enough with H.264 or most lossy codecs, and animation and graphics codecs are clearly broken.  I seem to have to export huge files directly to component or raw output in order to get a high enough quality video.... and then, of course I have to find another tool to transcode that to something I can actually distribute.
    What am I missing? I really want to use H.264. Is there a way to get at the deeper encoding options so I ca set up the VBR options and set a higher bitrate than the little slider on the options panel seems to allow?
    What are other people doing?  Are most people using a third party compression or encoding utility like Squeeze?  If so, it sucks, because I didn't count on having to spend an additional 900 bucks on top of the cost of Adobe Master Collection.

    ThreeDify,
    Thanks for the info.  I will try this out.  I'm getting very discussed with AME.  Yeah, there are lots of presets...but the output is terrible.  Kinda like you find with having to use Squeeze.  Am I missing something?  There are posts all over the place that AME doesn't get it done so to speak.  Where is Adobe addressing these issues?
    Does AfterEffects use a different encoder?  Why can I produce 'high quality' with AE and not with AME???  Yeah it takes longer to encode in AE but the final output is good.  Hmmm.
    My goal here is to render to 1280x720 and make it for presentation with my 'high power' computer.  Then upload it to youtube HD.  When I try to convert it to Youtube it looks like crap.
    Question:  What viewer do you use for .f4v files?  I'm using Adobe Media Player, and the .f4v files I have already made don't look good at all.
    I view with Quicktime and Windows Media Player.  Get two different levels of quality with both.  Same problem on the internet, IE8 doesn't view youtube videos as well as FireFox...  Yes the delima goes on, and on, and on.........
    I have got to get this to work..
    I'm going to watch this thread for awhile.  Hopefully others will share their successes.
    Thanks.
    Dave

  • E72 - Honeymoon to Divorce.

    Like many of you here, I've had quite a few mobile phones through the years and it's always a source of great excitement when a brand new phone lands on your desk. The new OS to explore, the Apps, the form factor. The downside of playing around with so many phones through the years is that there is no perfect device, no form factor that's perfect in every situation and no OS that can retain your interest beyond a few months before it's time to convince yourself that you need to try a new 'thing' which will solve everything for you (and make you more productive).
     As long as you know this up front and understand your interest is going to stray, you can get a fairly balanced view of what makes a great, as opposed to a good phone. Here are my thoughts on the E72.
    As a background to my adventure, I recently had an iPhone and although it's far from perfect I was fed up with the lack of a physical keyboard. It's not that I failed to bang an email out but I found it tedious when I made a typo and then had to spend 10 seconds trying to edit the message by tap'n'hold to move cursor, delete (x10), tap'n'hold to continue typing etc. It just got 'old' so I started to look for a device with a keyboard - remembering with fondness the keyboard on the old E61,  Treo680 and even the Blackberry 8700 (love those clicky keys!).
    Last October I bought an E63 because it was 'cheap' and to see if I could get back into using S60 + keyboard after such a long period in iPhone land.  To my surprise, the E63 whilst creaky and a little too 'red' for me, was good, it, I even took it to Hong Kong on a trip and left the laptop behind as an experiment (it worked.. but only just) although it obviously had some shortcomings. Toy like Email client, browser standards, ram, camera etc.overall it was a positive experience that made me want to explore further.
    I had bought a Nexus One in January the day it was released and although it's a super phone, it still had no keyboard and the Droid keyboard is awful so having had a half decent experience of the E63, I decided the E72 was the next best thing and decided to snap one up.
    The Honeymoon / First impressions.
    First impressions of the E72 is that it's a 'handsome' phone - not a good looking phone or a kiddy toy but a good, solid, classy looking phone for business. The keyboard was as good as the E63, the form factor was obviously near identical other than the materials being of higher grade and obviously it's slimmer and easier in the pocket.  First impressions were very good.
    The screen was a step back from most new phones, especially the Nexus One's gorgeous High-res effort but it's certainly clear and as it needs to be judged as a utility, not a spec-sheet competition so it fitted the job of a phone with a keyboard.  The screen was clear and bright and easy to use.
    Software seemed to be not much of a step up from the E63, I was expecting a higher grade of Application to be included and to my surprise (not disappointment) there was little on the surface to distinguish the E72 from the E63. I disliked the new transition effects as they felt like Nokia had iPhone envy rather than functional enhancements.
    Camera quality was very good for a phone although I don't like the viewer application with its spinning wheel of pictures - iPhone envy again? what's wrong with a 5x5 thumb view that would work well with the D-Pad? Once again, it works but it's not designed to optimise the experience of the form-factor.
    The touch-pad, I quite liked it, although I rely on the D-Pad more as it's just too small a surface to be useful.
    The Email client. At first it felt like a step back from the E63, the E72 client seemed 'bare' for some reason and I also wanted to make the font smaller so I could see more email headers on the screen at once (cant do it), I put all of this down to the email client being prosumer rather than consumer
    Overall, first impressions were good with the caveat of some changes to what I was used to, no bad thing.
    Married life / day to day:
    Day to day, as a Phone, the E72 is fantastic. Calling people by typing their name is so much easier than 'flicking' through lists, call quality is absolutely top notch, signal strength and 3G connectivity is years ahead of my old iPhone/Nexus/Blackberry/Treo and really shows that Nokia know how to make connectivity work from a technical perspective, something that almost every other company from HTC to Apple trail considerably behind on.
    Short-cuts to communication 'tasks' are as good as it gets. Series60 is a superb, intuitive and  well polished hierarchy of menus to get your calls and messages answered, read and replied to in record time. I can't praise the work that's been done over the years any higher.
    Setting up email was easy enough as standard manual entries although after a week or so I decided to setup mail through OviMail - this was painful.
    I'm pretty experienced in these things and technically very able (I'm into heavy  tech for a few decades) but this was a challenge for me. Passwords, logins, usernames etc.. it all becomes one mixed up frustrating jumble that I think would  have any mere mortal turned off or turn to their I.T. department in haste. It took me a couple of days to get it set up properly and even then it felt like it was hanging by its fingernails. Blackberry by contrast feels military strength compared to OviMail and BB's are far from a walk in the park when it comes to ease of setup.  Once I did get OviMail setup, it did work but I always had the feeling that it might break at any minute if I touched the wrong option. To its credit, it never actually did break, but it just left a bad taste that I never quite got rid of.
    Nokia are obviously moving heavily into services such as cloud infrastructure with Ovi services, Music etc. This push into services is being implemented the same way as Microsoft did a while back where none of the teams talk to one another other, it's all through a technical specification sheet. The E72 software works as silo-applications with each requiring the same login information being entered independently rather than simply log into Ovi services once, per device, and everything else flows. This constant entering of information per application is what makes S60 feel dated, it's unforgivable for a product manager of an integrated device like the E72 to let this pass. It either shows weak leadership within the product team or it shows a lack of cohesion between the teams within Nokia - again, a failure in leadership although higher up the chain of command. Yes, it's a big company but to let this happen shows the company has too many toothpaste managers and not enough tech savy people that love their work.
    A second level of confusion is the PC software that's bundled and are encouraged to install. Nokia's PC suite is solid, but why am I encouraged to install Ovi software and map loaders which seem to replicate the same job? It's not a problem with the device itself, but it significantly dilutes the user experience to bemused confusion. Obviously this is not the E72 but companies can no longer separate user-experience from device experience, especially when they're intertwined to the degree that they are these days.
    Setting up through a Mac was a lot simpler as you dont get all the Nokia apps, you just use iSync after manually searching for a plugin online. You loose some features but you do that with Macs anyway (yes.. I use one every day so stay away mac fanboys).
    The Calendar and contacts apps are adequate but feel dated and slow and could do with some new views and features.
    No Internet Radio feature as was in the E63.. I needed to scour the web to add this manually for some odd reason.
    OviStore is an average implementation with some average applications. As the E72 is a prosumer phone, not having games and apps, whilst good to pass time on a 747 are far from needed and using the stock built in applications was fair enough.
    Music player is 'functional' and did its duty without a hitch.
    One thing that worked particularly well was Skype. I do a lot of international calls and I think the Nokia implementation is the best around, hopefully they can make more of this feature as times goes by.
    Ovi/Nokia Maps. Where do I start with this? It's absolutely wonderful. I went a few trips to California, installed the map data on the device for California and Nevada and it worked perfectly. I bought a little car stand for $10 in Fry's electronics which worked for the trip and this just blew me away. Even with it's small screen, this has made me give away my Tom-Tom which I took with me on trips and never turned on once. Full marks.
    Battery life is incredible, for a device in this day and age to last 4 days on a single charge is simply stunning. I'll put up with the lack of a decent movie player any day if it means I get 4 days out of a single charge. Once again, Nokia should shout about how awesome this is to anyone that will listen. iPhone users get trained into worrying about battery life and turning things off where possible, not having to worry about battery life is an absolute blessing. Well done Nokia.
    To give an example, I drove from San Francisco to San Diego which takes 9 hours. I had the GPS running giving me directions, I had the Phone wired into AUX in the Car playing some Audio books for the entire duration and the battery life still had a good 2 days before needing a charge. The E72 battery life will forever go down in Legend as an 'I remember when' story.
    Not that this piece is about comparisons with other Phones, but coming from the UK it means heavy roaming charges if I use data. I took a similar business trip with a Nexus One and it was pretty much useless as their GPS mapping software is US only in features and, it can't work with offline maps and would have cost me a pretty penny to use on a roaming contract with all the Data it would download. The Nexus one is arrogantly setup to be of use to US consumers, overseas users get a half-glass feature set (no turn by turn / street-view etc..).
    The Divorce:
    There is a time in the daily life of using a Phone where the 'unique characteristics' of the Phone start to become tedious. This happens with all phones and gadgets, if it didn't we'd all still be using Videostar VHS recorders (does that give my age away?).
    After travelling up and down California, replying to a hundred or so emails over the course of a week, I noticed that I had just sent a handful of emails without being connected to Wifi. After examining a little further I worked out to my horror that the email client does not connect over Wifi - ever. It fails to work with Profiles, connection orders or anything remotely standard on almost any other Nokia/other device. Profiles for the uneducated should remain an unknown, it's a black art from a previous era that has no place in a modern day smartphone. Devices should simply connect over Wifi if connected, otherwise prompt the user if it's roaming - simple as that, no 'profile' needed. This is how all smartphones work, even the senile Blackberry OS does this out the box.
    I foolishly presumed that as the old mule E63 has worked over Wifi, the E72 being an 'evolved' device would also have this feature as standard. Nokia took it out.. what the $£%$£?
    I can only imagine at this point in time, Nokia deliberately engineered this deficiency to keep carriers happy. The E63 being 'consumer' can be used over wifi with a standard phone tariff, the E72 being a 'prosumer' device needs the user to buy a more expensive Smartphone tariff. I can't for the life of me work out why Nokia would remove a standard feature that was in all of their older phones.
    This little oversight of the Email client not connecting or alerting me that it was using a non-wifi connection actually cost me over 100 euros in data charges. This is simply not acceptable, no excuses, no patch-it at some point please. It's simply stupid. Yes, I've used Profimail etc.. but should I need to on a messaging device? I bought the phone for this feature, paying to replace it is simply counter-intuitive when so many other options exist without wrestling with work-arounds.
    Other than creating a hole in my wallet, I also through sheer paranoia removed all my Email accounts from Ovi and set them up as 'pull' accounts where I manually check my email. I need to do this simply as I travel so much and the roaming feature sometimes works - it's back to the holding on by your fingernails thing with this device, it should work but you're not quite sure.
    Running the much loved Maps application brings up a notice asking to connect to download data - even after saying NO, I still fail to have faith in the profiles working which removes the confidence you have in the device, It removed the feeling that you're in control and that really gets to you after a while. If Email has been engineered to ignore profiles, what else if going on under the surface, I should not have to read forums to gain confidence and if I was a typical consumer I wouldn't know where to start to find this out.
    Other problems starting to appear are that the E72 is starting to crash a few times every week, the dreaded space-bar problem has appeared, I can't upgrade the firmware for some reason even though I'm a few revisions behind (I bought it unlocked from Nokia), the back cover feels like it's starting to work loose and has fallen off a few times and the transition effects needed to be turned off (only half of them disappear). All of these things are in the forums here to some degree. Sometimes they annoy, sometimes not, but overall when you're having a tough day they all get to you.
    Summary:
    There's a scene in the Film "Flash Gordon" where a poor chap puts his hand in a tree trunk as a drunken game to see if the creature that lurks will bite him, he puts his hand in, smiles then slowly starts to pull his hand out before getting bitten just before he pulls his hand to safety - for some odd reason the E72 reminds me of that this. You approach with trepidation, become comfortable with the device then you get bitten just when you think all is well and you're about to make off with the cash.
    The E72 is the end of an era. You can tell by Nokia's responses to the problems on the E72 that their corporate focus is no longer on developing S60 but maintaining it with minimal effort.
    Their focus is now on Maemo and 300 other pressing priorities, their software engineers are stretched way too thin working on OviCloud services, Maemo and a multitude of new devices and holes/low quality are starting to become standard. This is starting to reflect on devices like the E72 which should be a flagship device but instead is not much more evolved than an 'old' E63 at half the price - which incidentally has an email client from the same codebase that can download over wifi. In many ways, plastic aside, I thought the E63 was better, more stable (for me) especially for the price.
    Nokia will obviously keep churning out yearly revisions to the S60 line (C6, E5 etc). But you know for a fact that they're pretty much the same devices with a cavalier attitude to improvements and the least engineering time to fix bugs/features as they can get away with. Arrogant yes, damage to the Nokia Brand by doing this? Absolutely. It will take me 5 years before I return to a new Nokia device after seeing the speed of progress and responses despite some great promise. Look how quickly Google turned around a Nexus One update with multi-touch after an outcry - it can be counted in days after launch, not 'devices' as seems to be the case here.
    The E72 device feels great, I love the form factor, the Keyboard is not the absolute best as that remains with Blackberry but it's certainly one of the very best. The phone functions are second to none.
    Ovi-Maps is just brilliant and the Battery life is as covered above is the stuff of legend.
    In many ways the E72 is the device I'm least able to move on from as there is so much to like and so much potential, but the amateur email implementation and creeping software problems makes this device seriously handicapped for anyone that travels or cares about the significant roaming fees that this device is designed to incur which is a genuine shame.
    Hopefully these things will get fixed in firmware upgrades, I'm sure some of them will but why should I wait? this is not the 1990's - this is mature technology and a (very) mature Operating system which should be solid as a rock.
    I like many on this forum would like to see Nokia do well but they've simply not stepped upto the plate by fixing basic feature holes nor have they communicated to the community that they're listening and will fix any of the problems. Instead they've announced new devices to replace the handsets that still have serious flaws. This is not the actions of a company that listens but a company that simply churns like a machine on a pre-set course with nobody at the wheel.
    Despite much to like about the E72, I for the single reason that Nokia seem to have no ears to hear and no fingers to type, am out until further notice.

    Gentlemen,
    Thank you for your kind words and replies to my experiences with the E72. Since writing the original post my Firmware has been updated not once, but twice no less.
    As I bought the device 'vanilla' style from Nokia online, I have no idea why I was unable to use PCSuite to upgrade my firmware despite my E72 being clearly a few revisions behind, I also tried upgrading from the device itself and it gave me a firm but fair 'No'; one day after hammering the server for a few minutes with constant requests, Nokia's servers finally rolled over and let me download an upgraded firmware directly onto the device. I can only presume it was a load-balance issue with their servers although open to being educated otherwise, I have no idea why PCsuite/Ovi Suite failed to upgrade the E72 despite downloading the new firmware every time I checked for an upgrade. Not to worry, these things happen.
    The new firmware (031.023) has some new features with a few new icons added and many bugs fixed. If I were to relate it to my original 'Honeymoon to Divorce' post, it's a bit like the Wife has put on some heels and lipstick and has lost a bit of weight in an attempt to win my affections (sorry female readers, I know it's unforgivably sexist).
    In that spirit, and considering the Nexus One that I moved back to using is a poor quality phone (remember that function?) I thought I'd give the E72 another spin to see if it fixed my original problems. I reset the device, cleared the SD card and set the device up from what should be a clean and sparkly install.
    You'll all be glad to hear I wont go into another vast post as most of my thoughts still stand, however:
    Email:
    The new email revision does fix some of the Wifi connection issues I was having. I'm glad to say it's faster and does indeed work over Wifi although it seems very slow when updating itself. Other phones seem to download a full header+message infinitely quicker that the E72. As I've been using the new firmware for a week solid, I'm increasingly annoyed that I need to download the HTML versions of email manually which takes terra-years; I believe the E71 email client can be configured to download HTML versions automatically as can my old E63 so why not the E72? Did someone 'merge' the old email source-code into Nokia messaging when they made the E72 client?
    A new bug has appeared that seems to lock into a constantly 'downloading' logo loop - where it never completes the email download. I need to click 'cancel' manually then the email appears as if by magic. There are other niggles that have seemingly crept in such as when using the E72 without a SIM card, the email client will work for a few hours then simply stop connecting manually or automatically, needing a reset to come to life again. **Geek alert on** As an old games programmer, this looks to me like a memory leak problem that could be easily found (or a thread that's gone haywire) - especially considering good debug tools have been around since it's Psion Series 5 roots. **Geek alert off**.
    I'm sure your mileage - or bugs - will be different from my own depending on your own unique circumstances but it's another of those two steps forward, one step back things which Nokia seem to do with the E-series.
    What's frustrating is the phone part of the E72 is world-class which when coupled with a bottom of class email client it defeats the reason to have a QWERTY in the first place. I'd trade the Phone stability for a best of breed email client on this device in a heartbeat. I've not tested the Gmail client as RistotheGreat did (above) so this may solve the email conundrum for some.
    Memory:
    As Beowulfpt above originally questioned, Ram is becoming as scarce as the Yeti. Before the firmware update I had plenty of spare RAM, after the firmware update I get low-RAM notifications every few days and I'm running the exact same email accounts without running ANY 3rd party software whatsoever.
    Stability:
    Overall crashes of the device are now far and few. It seems to be a step forward. Well done Nokia.
    Other:
    It's worth mentioning (thanks DeadKenny) that you can now sign in once to Ovi services and it's supposed to work across the Ovi suite of apps. I've not checked this personally as I'm using the device without adding extra apps at present but there was a note in the firmware note when upgrading.
    Internet Radio has now been added back to the Radio client - no need to go hunting for external versions of this anymore. This, as before, works pretty well.
    To close, it's interesting to read others frustrations (above) with this device, there are many good things about E72 and I can live with compromises in a device if it does other things well. In the case of the E72 it's a great phone but it's an incredibly poorly implemented email client, too poor if you ask me. If Nokia added a half stable email client with HTML (as they had many years back in other similar devices) then I'd put up with the tedious old-school 'profiles' and an old-school approach to connectivity and other such compromises. As it stands I can't in all honesty make this my main device when it's fails to offer a usable email client that I can use without frustration on a daily basis despite the new lipstick.
    As Nokia are so close to making this device 'ok', should I go back to the Nexus and put up with the lack of a keyboard and poor phone functionality, but excellent mail client - waiting for one more Firmware revision from Nokia? How long did you good E71 owners need to wait until Nokia fixed the problems for you? I really want to like this device despite my sheer frustration at it's implementation.
    Note: Despite the E72 still sitting on my desk and not on Ebay, my original post conclusions about Nokia's tardiness in selling half-finished devices still stands. I'd find it incredibly difficult to justify buying a new Nokia device for a number of years. This is a real shame when they have so many voiceless employees within their organisation that if given half a management-vote could turn this cheap strategy around.

  • Best practice for centralized material planning in distributed environment

    Hi All- Hope everybody is doing fine. Things are going fine,at my end.
    We are debating on the organization hierarchy decision at our current utilities client. We are proposing that:
    1)     We will have central warehouse as plant/storage location/warehouse.
    2)     Create one plant (it will be virtual only) and 65 storage locations. Plant maintenance orders will be created at the storage location and it will generate the reservation at the plant level. This reservation will be converted into STO during MRP run. Central warehouse plant will use this STO to create the outbound delivery and then the shipping documents. APO will be ok with arrangement as all the requirements are centralized. Now my problem is, the reservation doesn’t have any delivery address to copy it in the STO. To populate the delivery address automatically, I believe we will need the modification / enhancement. Am I right? If this is right then what type of modification we will require? I mean effort wise (hours etc.) & time wise.
    ANy help is highly appreciated.
    best regards,
    KHAN

    Hi,
    If all 65 storage locations are going to be just different areas within the same physical site (address) then that should be OK, but if any of those storage locations have a different site address to the others then I would suggest that they should be Plants and NOT storage locations.
    The reason you are having problems with addresses is that in a Plant to Plant reservation the plants have different addresses.
    PLEASE don't use storag locations for different sites, if you DO then this will only be the first of MANY modifications that you will have to do.
    Yes there will be more master data if they are all set as plants, but how many times does master data change compared to how many receipts, issues and transfers etc. will occur. I would rather compromise on the master data maintenance than have to compromise on EVERY movement.
    I can't stress this strongly enough, if you use storage locations when you should be using plants you WILL lose major functionality and the SAP implementation will be seen as a poor one.
    I have seen many implementations at first hand where this has been the one influencing factor that has resulted in a poor implementation instead of a good one.
    Steve B

  • Improving the 2013 Macbook Air i7 battery life

    Hi
    I've checked couple of topics related to this issue seems many people suffer from this problem, i7 8gb ram with 512gb ssd Macbook air has some issues with its battery life it reduced very quickly. I've applied some techniques -like smc reset,deleting launch daemons and agents- and have an improvement in battery performance. Now the point is, when i do the EtreCheck there are many kernel extensions displayed in the report. Is there any way to delete them and slightly improve the battery life?
    Here is the output:
    Hardware Information:
              MacBook Air (13-inch, Mid 2013)
              MacBook Air - model: MacBookAir6,2
              1 1.7 GHz Intel Core i7 CPU: 2 cores
              8 GB RAM
    Video Information:
              Intel HD Graphics 5000 - VRAM: (null)
    System Software:
              OS X 10.9.3 (13D65) - Uptime: 0 days 13:15:5
    Disk Information:
              APPLE SSD SM0512F disk0 : (500,28 GB)
                        EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted>: 209,7 MB
                        Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / [Startup]: 499,42 GB (372,12 GB free)
                        Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>: 650 MB
    USB Information:
              Apple Internal Memory Card Reader
              Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
                        Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
    Thunderbolt Information:
              Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
    Gatekeeper:
              Mac App Store and identified developers
    Kernel Extensions:
              [not loaded] com.NovatelWireless.driver.NovatelWirelessUSBCDCECMControl (3.0.13) Support
              [not loaded] com.NovatelWireless.driver.NovatelWirelessUSBCDCECMData (3.0.13) Support
              [not loaded] com.ZTE.driver.ZTEUSBCDCACMData (1.3.35) Support
              [not loaded] com.ZTE.driver.ZTEUSBMassStorageFilter (1.3.35) Support
              [not loaded] com.nike.sportwatch (1.0.0) Support
              [not loaded] com.novamedia.driver.IceraUSB_MSD_Bypass (1.3.0) Support
              [not loaded] com.novatelwireless.driver.3G (3.0.13) Support
              [not loaded] com.novatelwireless.driver.3GData (3.0.13) Support
              [not loaded] com.novatelwireless.driver.DisableAutoInstall (3.0.13) Support
              [not loaded] com.option.driver.Option72 (2.15.0) Support
              [not loaded] com.option.driver.OptionHS (3.26.0) Support
              [not loaded] com.option.driver.OptionMSD (1.21.0) Support
              [not loaded] com.option.driver.OptionQC (1.11.0) Support
              [kext loaded] com.rim.driver.BlackBerryUSBDriverInt (0.0.67) Support
              [not loaded] com.rim.driver.BlackBerryUSBDriverVSP (0.0.67) Support
              [not loaded] com.vodafone.driver (3.0.9) Support
              [not loaded] com.vodafone.driver.Data (3.0.9) Support
              [not loaded] com.zte.driver.cdc_ecm_qmi (1.0.26) Support
              [not loaded] com.zte.driver.cdc_usb_bus (1.0.26) Support
              [not loaded] de.novamedia.driver.NMSamsung (0.0.2) Support
              [not loaded] de.novamedia.driver.NMSmartplugSCSIDevice (1.0.1) Support
              [not loaded] de.novamedia.driver.NMUSBCDCACMControl (3.2.12) Support
              [not loaded] de.novamedia.driver.NMUSBCDCACMData (3.2.12) Support
              [not loaded] de.novamedia.oem.vodafone.vtp.huawei.cdc (0.0.2) Support
    Problem System Launch Daemons:
              [running] de.novamedia.nmnetmgrd.plist Support
    Launch Daemons:
              [loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist Support
              [loaded] com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist Support
    Launch Agents:
              [not loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist Support
              [loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist Support
    User Launch Agents:
              [loaded] com.valvesoftware.steamclean.plist Support
    User Login Items:
              None
    Internet Plug-ins:
              FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 13.0.0.214 - SDK 10.6 Support
              QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
              Flash Player: Version: 13.0.0.214 - SDK 10.6 Support
              Default Browser: Version: 537 - SDK 10.9
              o1dbrowserplugin: Version: 5.4.1.18709 Support
              SharePointBrowserPlugin: Version: 14.4.1 - SDK 10.6 Support
              googletalkbrowserplugin: Version: 5.4.1.18709 Support
              JavaAppletPlugin: Version: 14.9.0 - SDK 10.7 Check version
    Safari Extensions:
              Open in Internet Explorer: Version: 1.0
    Audio Plug-ins:
              BluetoothAudioPlugIn: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.9
              AirPlay: Version: 2.0 - SDK 10.9
              AppleAVBAudio: Version: 203.2 - SDK 10.9
              iSightAudio: Version: 7.7.3 - SDK 10.9
    iTunes Plug-ins:
              Quartz Composer Visualizer: Version: 1.4 - SDK 10.9
    User Internet Plug-ins:
              OctoshapeWeb: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.8 Support
    3rd Party Preference Panes:
              Flash Player  Support
              MusicManager  Support
              Xmarks for Safari  Support
    Time Machine:
              Skip System Files: NO
              Auto backup: YES
              Volumes being backed up:
              Destinations:
                        My Passport Air [Local] (Last used)
                        Total size: 465.41 GB
                        Total number of backups: 1
                        Oldest backup: 2014-02-20 22:28:07 +0000
                        Last backup: 2014-02-20 22:28:07 +0000
                        Size of backup disk: Excellent
                                  Backup size 465.41 GB > (Disk size 0 B X 3)
              Time Machine details may not be accurate.
              All volumes being backed up may not be listed.
    Top Processes by CPU:
                   3%          WindowServer
                   1%          hidd
                   1%          mds_stores
                   0%          fontd
                   0%          warmd
    Top Processes by Memory:
              82 MB          Google Chrome
              52 MB          Google Chrome Helper
              49 MB          mds_stores
              41 MB          Calendar
              33 MB          WindowServer
    Virtual Memory Information:
              6.03 GB          Free RAM
              998 MB          Active RAM
              97 MB          Inactive RAM
              633 MB          Wired RAM
              522 MB          Page-ins
              0 B          Page-outs
    Is there any other suggestions that you may offer ? Many thanks

    You can use the new Activity Monitor to determine a unitless "Energy Impact" value:
    You can also click the battery icon in your Mac's menu to reveal significant energy hogs (UPS is shown below):
    Whereas Apple recently updated their apps to take advantage of Mavericks' energy saving algorithms, few other vendors have. I surmise the prominent "Energy Impact" hall of shame addition to the new Activity Monitor is Apple's subtle way of nudging them into compliance.
    Google's plethora of invasive OS X system modifications is a popular reason for excessive battery drain. Google has yet to demonstrate the ability to develop efficient OS X apps, and one can only surmise they are not interested in doing so. If you elect to use Google Chrome or any other poorly implemented OS X programs, you must accept the detrimental effect they will have on performance and battery life.
    If you no longer use a Blackberry, uninstall RIM's software. Be sure to follow its uninstallation instructions.

  • Open letter to Cisco regarding the UC320 platform

    Cisco,
    I have never in my life been exposed to a "production" piece of equipment with so many bugs, missing features and oddities as the UC320. While I am sure many of you are working hard to reign in the problems, this platform is an utter embarrassment that should be in the preliminary alpha stages, not a channel product being sold to end users.
    It is clear that Cisco has little understanding of how SMALL business works and how SMALL partners work with small business customers. A larger partner may be able to string a larger business along with promises of bug fixes and feature additions while charging them to make things right and.or padding the overall cost to account for the callbacks. True small businesses don't have the time, patience or money to deal with problematic hardware. When a partner sells a small business a piece of technology, it better work (at a reasonable cost) or the technology and the partner are out the door.
    I was extremely excited when this system was announced and saw great potential for small business customers and an alternative to the Avaya Partner IP and other platforms targeted at the same demographic. I jumped in and put a UC320 in the office of one of my small customers. This whole experience has cost me the trust of a client and is going to end up costing me $3000-$4000 out of pocket (hardware, labor, travel) to make things right with the customer.
    As it stands, countless hours have been spent trying to get this system to operate in a reasonably stable and productive manner. At this time the UC320 system has been reset and reconfigured in KEY mode (this time using 2.1.3(0), as the problems with steering digits, call routing and redial in "hybrid mode" made the system more than a little cumbersome to use. Now in KEY mode, caller ID only works on some stations AFTER a call is picked up. On one station, incoming calls are somehow routed to the "Phone Monitor" buttons instead of the "Shared FXO Line" buttons. The user has to press the monitor button to pick up a call, but the call does not always ring at the station so she has to watch for the lights. While the caller ID functionality is a bit better after the latest firmware update, it is still far from working properly. These basic call routing problems are not reasonable and not acceptable, period. The customer is tired of "we are working on it" and so am I.
    Other problems (to mention a few):
    The GUI is full of buggy behavior. One example if many: The impendence matching dialog only works the first time around and then the GUI loses track of what it is doing and must be reset.
    It takes 7-10 minutes for the GUI to load to the login screen over a remote connection. The UC320 is connected to a Verizon DSL, while not blazing fast it is a decent connection. Initial GUI loading on the LAN is almost as bad.
    The IE9 product that ships with every new Windows computer is not compatible with the GUI. This is not reasonable.
    The AA is somewhat unpredictable with regard to picking up calls and sometimes results in a busy tone and dropped call, even if the call is the ONLY call on the system. Sometimes the prompts are garbled and sometimes the AA does not even pick up.
    Steering digit redial issue - still not addressed. Redial on hybrid mode is useless, as is the phonebook.
    Caller ID only works part of the time, yet on every other system I have ever used, it works 100% of the time. This is not acceptable.
    Answered calls on shared FXO lines show as MISSED on other stations with those lines. The workaround: remove the missed calls display feature. This is not acceptable.
    Thus UC320 is not happy unless it is the only router, DHCP and DNS client on the LAN. The grayfield implementation appears to fail no matter what LAN topology and equipment are used. This device is far from friendly to the typical SBS or existing LAN with a dedicated DNS and/or DHCP server.
    The handsets have a cheap feel to them compared to the Avaya and other competitors phones.
    The sound quality of the ringtones is almost laughable if not sad
    The speakerphone quality and overall voice quality are not as good as the competition's.
    The filtering functionality of the logging feature does not appear to work properly
    Firmware updates often result in a HANG condition where either the GUI needs reset, the system needs a physical reset and/or sometimes defaulted
    Firewall port forwarding rule oddities where a rule is deleted from the gui but is still active in the firewall, yet the inability to easily use another data router to work around this problem.
    The inability of the device to properly use the LAN port for INTERNET based functionality (Time for example) if the WAN port is NOT connected,
    countless other 'issues" raised in the support forum and other venues...
    These are ALL very basic functions that one would expect to be fixed BEFORE a basic telephone system platform is released for production. It is absolutely unreasonable for a CUSTOMER to have to put up with a system this buggy and it is absolutely unreasonable for a partner to have to devote this much time and money to getting system to work at even a very basic level of functionality.
    To repeat the scenario: This config is as basic as it gets running 2.1.3(0) with (3) system phones, (3) users, (2) pots trunks and that's it. There are no odd call routing scenarios, no complex AA rules or schedules (in fact the AA is defaulted, including prompts). All (3) system phones have BOTH shared FXO lines (KEY MODE). Each and every firmware version has been tried and the system has been defaulted numerous times. The system fails to meet even the most basic expectations of myself or the end user and has become a sore spot between our company and a very good client.
    I am somewhat baffled, if not outright bothered by the fact that this device is riddled with so many problems and the fixes are taking so long to be implemented, if at all. I have been asked (ordered) by the customer to get this "hunk of crap" out of their office and replace it with something that works "at no additional cost". I could not agree with the customer more...
    A very unhappy Cisco Partner.
    William Burnett

    To William (and Cisco,)
    Honestly, I like Cisco.
    I like their  "openess" (you can find documentation and help on almost anything  anywhere), the contribution they make to industry by their huge R&D  effort (more than all their competition combined....or so I've been  told...), the accessibility and responsiveness of some of their key  people in the distribution channel, and yes, I like the ecosystem in  terms of support, tons of free education and sales support for both  their SMB and classic enterprise solutions.
    Having said that, I thank God for people like William  Burnett, who I am sure opened the eyes of many partners about the things  that are horrendously wrong with some of the products in the SMB  portfolio, most notably the UC320. I think it is fair to say, that  William has effectively "killed" it (the UC320) in it's present  incarnation. That is, unless Cisco, decides to really rise to the  challenge and fix a product that at first seemed ideal for the small  enterprise, but which was poorly implemented in terms of QC and in some  cases design.
    We certainly are not going to be touching the UC320  with a 10ft pole now Nobody wants (or can afford to) get a bad name by  selling "trouble" to your Mom&Pop shops or to people whose trust you  worked hard to gain and who are really depending on you to deliver. Not  in this economy....not ever.
    Coming from a Nortel telephony background, its really  hard to accept that having to respond to trouble calls or complaints  continuously from customers when Nortel products worked so reliably. In  fact, Nortel Norstar is so reliable as a key system that people joke ,  that's why they went out of business, they couldn't generate enough  turnover in new sales on account of people holding on to their Norstar's  forever.
    As a seller/installer/user of Cisco voice (UC540) and CME there are a couple recommendations I would like to make to Cisco:
    1)Private line emulation - inability to transfer or conference calls on a private line.  (using the TRUNK XX command) on the CME/UC500 platforms needs to be  significantly improved in order to keep up with the competition:
    for  one, when you select a private line and make a call you cannot transfer  that call. Every other system I have worked with allows you to do this.  This for me is a glaring "defect/design flaw". I spent a lot of time  trying to get this "fixed" as I couldnt believe that Cisco would just  omit such a basic function when all their competition  has it. (You dont  even think about this when dealing with other systems.) Its just  expected.
    2)Private line emulation - Inability to reflect the dialed number in the Call Detail Records for calls made via a "private line". If you select a private line on the UC500 or  CME and make a call, the dialed number would not show up in the CDR. I  have programmed systems from Nortel (Norstar, BCM,CS1000), Avaya - (IP  Office 500, Partner Plus, and S8x00 Communication Servers) as well as  various systems from Mitel and
    Panasonic .  The CDR packages for these systems are very well implemented and  documented. Cisco's systems are well documented as well, but this is an  area of the implementation where Cisco falls behind the competition. I am sure this can be fixed, but for some reason, despite a number of requests, it hasnt.
    In  trying to understand why it is Cisco, with such a huge R&D budget,  can't seem to get some things working properly that the competiton has  long ago solved and moved on with, I have come to the conclusion that it  must be that Cisco propably didnt tap enough of the right (human)  resources when it was developing its voice portfolio, and the lack of  industry experience shows up in some random places. Sad to say, not  paying attention to some of these details, to real world usage  scenarios, makes what would be an otherwise super product, just good  enough.
    Cisco is the biggest networking vendor on  the planet. People have a right to have high exectations of Cisco. Their  marketing also conditions users and partners to expect more when using  their solutions. While we accept that no one is perfect, not even the  mighty Cisco, I think most of the complaints and dissapointment  expressed in this forum, on this particular thread, are justified  because there is a strong feeling that if Cisco can be such a  trailblazer with their enterprise portfolio, that they should have  understood the importance of ensuring and enforcing good quality control  in the design and manufacture of the SMB portfolio. I honestly hope  someone from "Corporate" or high enough to make a differnce, looks at  this thread started by William and uses it to inspire the will to fix  what needs to be fixed to redeem the UC320 in whatever incarnation, in  the eyes of its partners (even former ones....such as William)and  customers. This is beginning to look like a textbook case of how not to  do product development.

  • My experience with Tiger/new Powerbook 15", 1.67 ghz

    Apple proclaims "Mac OS X v10.4 Tiger. The world’s most advanced operating system."
    Well, that hasn't been the case in my experience.
    I bought a new 15 Powerbook HR, 1.67 ghz, 1.5 gb ram, 80gb hd on 11/4/05 (from MacMall). At this point I have about 20gb free.
    Problems I have noticed with it/OSX.(Most have been fixed by an archive and install done a few weeks ago.) Here's my trial by fire.
    In chronological order
    - trackpad lags
    - many icons not correct after using Migration Assistant.
    - some icons open up the wrong applications
    - window resize button on Finder, and some app windows, doesn't open window to full screen. Also doesn't open window so that scroll bars disappear.
    - dragging a file up or down a window in list view doesn't always make the window scroll up or down when I go up or down to the top or bottom edges. When they do move, it races. Smooth scrolling has no effect.
    - CDr recorded on a machine with OSX 10.3.9 shows up as a recordable CD!
    - screen dims when I disconnect power supply
    -Network option from the Go menu does nothing.
    - Doing a Get Info on a html file has Internet Explorer as the app to open when the files have Mozilla icons
    - icon for some apps have wrong application logo on them
    - screen dims and brightens rapidly, disconcertingly in low light. I turn off the ambient light adjustment on the monitors control panel. This is poorly implemented. Having the keys light up is nice though.
    - can't reset F7 key to take pictures of screen. (I eventually am able to do it.)
    - the clicker gives me a sharp pain in my arm from the second day of use. This has gotten better now but I was worried I might be getting carpal tunnel/repetitive stress injury. (This happened when I got my new Powerbook Firewire too, eventually going away.) The clickers are too stiff when new.
    - I call Applecare. They don't have my registration information I gave them when I signed up on the web. We reset the Power Manger.
    - Quicktime movies have no sound. I later throw out the LAME stuff (Component and Framework) and get sound back.
    - I go to Genius at Apple Store. They tell me I am using a non-native resolution, that is why I am having screen dimming. (Wrong. It was the ambient light control.) They also say whatever software I have installed is likely to be causing most of the other problems.
    - I get Finder freeze #1
    - Preview does not animate gifs. It did with 10.3.9.
    -System sounds do not work. Upon reboot they do. Flakey.
    - some finder windows are not opening up with the item count in list view.
    -desktop gets rearranged
    -occasionally keyboard turns letters into numbers as if number lock is on. It isn't. The it will stop working altogether. Rebooting cures this. (Happens twice before I call AppleCare.)
    - call AppleCare. They have my old address when I bought the Powerbook! I get registered again.I cannot install GarageBand, which I threw out thinking I didn't need it, because the install DVDs that came with my machine have an error reading the software only package. They will send me a new install disk #1.
    - scrolling is not smooth, races.
    - I notice the memory door has 3 out of the 4 screws loose. I tighten them. The battery door feels a little loose too but that is unfixable.
    - keyboard doesn't respond #3
    - I call AppleCare. They have the wrong address still in their database!
    -eject DVD does not work. (It works all other times.)
    - system freeze #2
    - kernal panic #1
    - Call AppleCare. My TechTool Deluxe CD will not boot. I ask for a replacement. (I can't believe they are still using TechTool Deluxe. I remember what a hassle it was trying to get a working disc with my Powerbook Firewire.
    - keyboard types wrong characters #4
    -Print preview does not work. (it does all other times.)
    -Preference for video capture program (BTV) is not remembered
    - audio is only heard when BTV is running (since fixed.)
    - system freeze #3
    - keyboard stops working #5
    - I call Apple Care. We zap P-ram 3X.
    - file sizes incorrect in list view. Have to open window a second time to get correct info.
    - install DVD #1 arrives. It is defective.
    - system freeze #4
    - I update to 10.4.4. I hope this will cure the problems. Nope.
    - Help doesn't work.
    - Battery firmware update process works but isn't smooth. It crashes "unexpectedly" as I check to make sure it is really done. (It kept telling me I needed to do it.)
    - Help works.
    - boot takes forever after 10.4.4 update.
    - battery firmware update wants to run again.
    - file size is wrong in finder list view windows.
    - keyboard stops working #6
    - fan stops yet processor is still VERY busy as I am calibrating battery. Charge is about 5%.
    - I quit IMovie, It then says it quit "unexpectedly". (This happens with other apps still.)
    - I have to use power key to wake it from sleep, as I calibrate battery.
    - keyboard problem #7
    - system freeze # 5
    - text editing in iDVD is very buggy. Cursor is impossible to see against background with many themes. There is no way to increase cursor size.
    - AppleCare says they have sent TechTool Deluxe CD. I haven't gotten it yet.
    - I receive install disk #1. 2 actually. I install software bundle only. It works! I also reinstall CPU help files. Help still doesn't work.
    - I archive and install. (It installs 10.4.2 so I update to 10.4.4), Help doesn't work.
    - Help works without my having done anything. OK.
    - I repair a gazillion permissions. (funny how when you install the system software the permissions then need to be repaired. You would think the system would know to set the permissions correctly upon installation.
    - I notice the order of the right hand menu items has changed (clock, keyboard setup, OS 9 icon...)
    - file sizes wrong in list view
    - BTV has audio loop at times. (See thread on Topic "New Powerbook Audio Stutter / Looping / Echo problem in Using your PowerBook G4 15-inch Aluminum forum.)
    - keyboard problem #8
    - keyboard problem #9
    - I call AppleCare. TechTool Deluxe CD has still not arrived. We discuss other problems. I get hung up on.
    -keyboard problem #10
    - I go to Apple Store. Talk to the genius. He tells me the system software is "a house of cards", adding other software can cause unpredictable results. He zaps P-ram 3x, does something in open firmware. Recommends a clean install. I think about it and later decide not to.
    - I lose system sounds after I install USBVison video capture driver for Tiger. I eventually get it back.
    - I repair LOTS of permissions.
    - The fan starts to make bad noise.
    - system freeze $6
    - I do a Get Info on a file I making with BTV. The OS tells me it is 11GB. I stop the recording and then I check again. It says it is 1.5 gb.
    -iChat won't open. It starts, according to Activity Monitor, runs for about two seconds and then disappears.
    - Network, under the Go menu, does nothing.
    - I call AppleCare.
    - I notice cursor disappears in Firefox.
    - Yahoo IM icon keeps getting moved. All the icons it is next to are spaced about the same but this one keeps getting moved.
    - I Stuff some stuff. The fan keeps running, it is still hot after I am finished. I have to reboot to get things back to normal.
    - Some icons for PING files on my desktop have changed from having Preview icons to Quicktime icons. I use Get Info to change them back from Picture Viewer (OS 9!)
    - the fan comes on with only my normal apps running (Eudora, Firefox, Yahoo IM)
    Ok, that is about all up 'til now. I still haven't gotten my TechTool Deluxe CD but need to give that a few more days. I now have 8 install DVDs. (Another install #1 came yesterday, making a total of 6 #1, and 2 #2s) The address on the invoices are finally correct, most had the wrong town but the right zip code which I had corrected many times.
    The problems that are still recurring are the keyboard problem, applications still sometimes crash "unexpectedly" even though I am quitting them, the file sizes are not right the first time around in finder list view windows. Most everything else was cured by the archive and install. Little weirdnesses still crop up though. I am not sure if the echo problem has been fixed. (Mac OS) Help is still slow to appear.
    Thanks for bearing with me. I do hope things get smoother in the future. I have been using Macs for about 10 years now, starting with a used SE and 7.something, going to a refurbished LC 580 and 7.5.5, a new Powerbook Firewire and 9.2.2. I have also used 10.3.9 which seemed to be a lot more stable than 10.4.
    Cheers,
    John L

    If it was me I would backup to DVD/ External HD if you have and erase / reinstall OSX.
    Update all and once you are finished without the user folder / any of your files on torture the Pbook to see if this happens again.
    This likely will be able to give you an idea about hardware or software problems.
    If all is well , likely not then copy "COPY" over from the backup you "ONLY COPY" documents, music, Photo's, desktop stuff and also place programs back in Applications folder.
    The reason for the above is that in the /user/"you"/library folder it stores the settings for Icon's, prefferences to programs and some other useless stuff + E-mails for either Mac Mail and or Microrubish Entorture "entourage" depending on what you have or used also Itunes prefs.
    Once this is copied leave the "/user/you/library" stuff alone and see how it runs.
    App's/programs will ask to have it's preferences set again as if /when you have installed it for the first time.
    Likely most of the issues if software was in the/becuase of the settings in "/user/you/library".
    If this solves a lot of problems the go with care and copy the "E-MAIL +/OR ENTORUTE/ENTOURAGE + ITUNES" to the same place as where they came from but obviously in /user/you/library/ subfolders etc. same subfolders.
    For Entorture search for a file called "database" as this holds all the e-mail for entourage and by copying it, when you next open Entorture it will pick-up all emails + adresses etc like it was never moved also in the same spot as it was in the new instalation / subfolders etc..
    If all this fails and you as close to what I reccomended here, there is then still some issues then likely it is hardware related.
    How do I know this : Had for 5 times in 365 days had my Pbook in for repair so I have had to about 120+ times had to reinstall OSX 10.3.9 and/or Tiger.
    I hope this helps as for hardware I am buying Alienware or Extreme as they can upgrade the cpuvideobasically all else except the motherboard " amd opteron 64 dualcore + Nvidia fx quadro 1400 + 1 or 2 hd's + 1/2 dvd's etc. etc. $2500"

Maybe you are looking for

  • What is the best way to get rid of troyan virus and safari virus?

    what is the best way to get rid of viruses on my macbook?  the viruses are causing popups and saying that the device is infected.

  • Setting Default power on states for PCI-6723

    Hi all, I would like to set some digital lines in PCI-6723 as HIGH or LOW.For this i have made small exe of digital states and iam running while booting of pc takes place.but iwant to hide this execution while its running it should run once and quit

  • Profit Center Master Data - User Exit

    Hi, I need to add few validation to the profit center master data. If there is any user exit that I can use or is there any validation like OB28 (we have for financial accounting document) that can be used. Please help me out. Regards, Binay Agarwal

  • MacBook Air 1.4ghz i5 vs i7 for my mom

    Hi, I am helping my mother pick a laptop.  She currently has a very old eMac which she only uses about half the hard drive space. I am thinking the MacBook Air will meet her needs.  She has test driven both sizes and prefers the the 13 inch. I am con

  • A Different ITunes Library?

    Is there any way to get Keynote to recognize an iTunes library other than the one on the startup volume. I'd like to store video clips in an iTunes library on an external hard drive and access them through the media browser if that's possible. Thanks