Posting Balance not clear
Hi,
I am doing posting to accounts for an employee, when i run posting it posts the retro payroll results also, is there anyway to avoid postind program taking into consideration the retro payroll.
As it shows posting balance not clear when it compares the old periods.
Regards
Najeeb
To stop the retro: Please maintain a suitable date in "Ear Retro Acc. Date" in PU03. System will not go beyond this date.
Reward points appreciated.
Message was edited by:
Arun Sundararaman
Similar Messages
-
POSTING ERROR-MESSAGE POSTING BALANCE NOT CLEARED FOR THE PERIOD 2/2008A
Hi
I have a problem in payroll posting. While posting for one employee's persn number rejected and gave a message as Posting Balance not cleared for the period 2/2008A. To come out of the problem I changed the Payroll status record using pu03 changed the Erliest Retro date as 01.06.2008. Again tried to post but not posted again same Message displayed. After changing the Erliest Retro record I have not run the payroll for the particular employee. Is it required to run the payroll for the employee after changing the status in PU03. Request to guide on this
Thanks
EKP YadavHi there
The posting may be out of balance for the employee because their credits dont equal their debits...
Do a test posting for the employee with the log on, this will tell you what amounts are being posted - and should give you an inidcation of where the balance is not cleared...
Yes, you would have to re-run the employee if you'd changed the retro date in PU03, but I dont think that will fix your posting problem....Should the employee have retroe'd?
From what I have seen, just changing the control record doesn't usually fix an out-of balance..there is usually another reason....eg wagetype incorrectly posting to the wrong number of accounts....or a missing wagetype on the employee (eg bank details...no /559 for the net pay to go to).
Cheers
Mary -
F.05 - Revaluation posting are not clearing in GL Account (Gr/Ir)
Hi Gurus,
We have FX revaluation issue. After execution of F.05 - the system performs an automatic reversal of the postings for the GRIR account on the first posting date of the new month but there is no valuation posting last posting date (month end).
So, FX revaluation is not clearing in GL Account.
Only one document posted for the first posting date of the new month and there is no posting for the month end valuation.
Please advice, on how to clear the FX entries that are currently sitting as open item in GL (Gr/IR).
ThanksHi Tejas,
Thank you for your reply. I have tried selecting various exchange rate type and was bale to post both valuation doc (for month end date) and reversal doc (for beginning of the date of next month). In F.05 posting tab tab I couldn't find "Determine Automatically" filed. So not able to find what caused for these postings. This has been done for last 4 months and now there are open items setting in GL(Gr/Ir) which needs to be cleared.
One more thing I am hearing from user is that when they run f.05 the posting cleared automatically. When I tried myself it doesn't clear the line items but post the tow line items with debit and credit. Is something I am missing here.
Please advise me on clearing the difference balances.
Thanks -
Payment Card posting - Do not clear invoice
We are using the payment card functionality in Sales Orders for one of our requirements to monitor credit authorization from a Financing company for our Customers. Once we receive the authorization back, like in credit cards, the delivery can take place.
However, unlike credit card orders, we do not want to clear the invoice on posting. We want it to post like any other normal Credit sales, debiting the Customer and crediting Revenue. (For credit card orders, it clears the Customer to a CC clearing account). We wouldn't have the Credit card settlement process either. We shall be receiving the funds from the Financing company as per agreed terms.
Now the issue - how do we prevent the invoice from getting cleared on Release to Accounting? Do we use an user exit? Even if we manage to do it, will it have any downstream impact, like credit card settlement program or anything like that?
Any suggestions will be highly appreciated.
Thanks!
FPHi Renan,
Let me explain the issue with an example:
Example -
1 01 21000491 XXX Technologies 435.00
2 50 400000 Sales 400.00-
3 50 220900 Use Tax 29.00-
4 50 220900 Use Tax 4.00-
5 50 220900 Use Tax 2.00-
6 15 21000491 XXX Technologies 435.00-
7 40 120010 Visa Receivable Clg 435.00
Lines 1 to 5 are the ones that post normally without payment card. Line 6 and 7 are posting because the sales order has been authorized by a payment card. Although I am using the payment card functionality, I do not want to post lines 6 and 7 as the payment is going to come from the Financing company on due date.
I hope this will help to understand the issue at hand.
Thanks,
FP -
Hi,
I will appreciate if someone could give me some information about Posting balance not cleared.
after Run Payroll, I run for posting through PC00_m40_CIPE,
Here,
Salary ( earning ) 104.600,00
Balance Sheet account ( deduction) 32.028,00
Expense account 136.628,00 it shows wrong (added earning + deduction )
How to make correct like - salary 104.600,00
deduction 32.028,00
Expense a/c 72.572,00Prabu,
Shortly i Will explain you the logic of postings. All components which are earnings for an employee should be your expence a/c i.e. C a/c's and the complonents which are deductions for an employee are balance sheet a/c's i.e. F or FC a/c based on your FI configs which you define these in table V_T52EK thru SM30 tcode.
The problem you have mentioned in your V_T52EZ & V_T52EL tables i.e. Maintain WT charecteristics table.
Check all your a/c's again and check that all "F" a/c's should be with indicator sign and all "C" a/c's should be with indicator sign in table V_T52EL for your information and remember one more point while maintaining characteristics for each WT's.
IT0014 deduction WT's components should be in "F" a/c's only but with indicator sign as per the concept of finance.
Let us knw any more clarifications needed.
All the best.
Regards,
TATA
Edited by: Prashantkumar Tata on Jun 18, 2011 8:29 AM -
FI Posting Document not Generating
Hi Gurus,
I have created actual payroll results and have run posting to FI.
The run is successful where it shows the Green Button but no documents are getting generated please guide what could be an issue. I am getting this error:
The selected runs do not contain any documents
Please guide !!
Regards,
KPJYes Revathi, I have maintained the cost centre for the employee.
But now I am getting an error "Posting balance not balanced check the Posting Characteristics of wage types"
I have one major issue
the PCR X040 is cumulating wage types /560 , /562 and /559 amounts double the amount in /550 and /110.
and that is why when I am running posting the balance is not zero. when it shud be?
my net and statutory net are 4200 SAR each.
But /560 , /562 and /559 are with 8400 SAR each..
Please guide...
I wud really appreciate your help...
Regards,
KPJ -
Payroll's Error message: Posting balance is not cleared (period 02 / 2014 a)
Dear Experts,
I am new to SAP HR. And would like get help for this issue
After EHP 6 upgarde, when process the payroll, system prompt this error message: Posting balance is not cleared (period 02 / 2014 a).
Checked the RT and it showed that the tax employee deduction was RM90.93. But when it comes to payslip display the tax amount showed different figure of RM90.94 which might be the cause for “posting balance is not cleared” messageHi,
ChecK Manoj Shakya's response in the thread.
Posting to FI-err :3G103, posting balance is not cleared
Cheers,
Manoj. -
Posting balance is not cleared (period 01/2007 A) - showing as ERROR
Hi SDN's,
When am doing simulation for posting, showing error as
"Posting balance is not cleared (period 01/2007 A)".
Plz need your valuable suggestions to solve my issue.
Thanks for your timings,
Kind regards,
Saisree.SHi Sai,
check the amounts for Balance sheet accounts and Expanses account. find the difference for both the accounts. the difference might be some wage type or wage types amount.
find the wage types and assign the accounts. then your problem will get solved.
If the difference amoun is net payment you have to maintain the bank account number. then it will get solved.
Kumar -
Posting balance is not cleared (Period 06 / 2011 A) error
Mates
I'm trying to do a Test run; no documents are created .system throws a the error message.I realize its a common error but hoping to fix this.
"Posting balance is not cleared (Period 06 / 2011 A)
Message no. 3G103
Diagnosis
The employee has been rejected because the balance of the generated posting items has not been balanced.
Procedure
Check the Customizing steps for the posting characteristics for the wage types that exist in the corresponding payroll result."
it seems to point us to T52EZ -posting charcteristics of wagetype.
i have mapped the cost centre in 27inftp and position is default one in 1inftp.
my symboli accounts are d001,d002,d003,d004,d005
account assignemtn type is c-posting to expense account
posting characteristic i have mapped wagetypes to above symbolic accounts
say 8000-d001
8010-d002
for ex
Plus/Minus Sign for Posting-+ve amounts as debot and -ve as credtit
generated posting date for payroll periods
in the activitws in ac system
have assigned the symbolic accounts to expense acocunts
i have mapped the costcentre for that employee in 27 ,im using default position in 0001.
there is a wagtype say food allowance that hasnt been mapped to G/l ?payroll result has an amount for that say 2000.
i have created a symbolic account but when it comes to mapping to G/L ,i have excluded one.
would that have an impact?
kindly share your expert views.
No Worries
KGMates,
infact im doing this in sandbox client ...i deleted the payroll results tcd pu00....i once again checked the g/l mapping ,,im still getting the posting error ..im not sure if im missing anything here ..
payresults are like below
Payroll Results
Personnel No. 811 mustafa mohaammed - Other Countries
Seq. number 00001 - accounted on 02.07.2011 - current result
For-Period 06.2011 (01.06.2011 - 30.06.2011)
In-Period 06.2011 (Fin.: 30.06.2011)
Table RT - Results Table
PCRlGr Wage Salary type WC C1 C2 C3 Assign: AltPa CA BT Abs.
Var ss gn Un t Rate Number Amount
/101 Total gross amount
6,075.00
/203 Average basis 03
450.00
/550 Statutory net
6,075.00
/559 Payment 01
6,075.00
/560 Payment Amount
6,075.00
/700 Wage/salary + ER contr.
6,075.00
/840 Diff. to avg. month 01
13.50
3 /001 Valuation basis 1 01
26.61
3 8000 Monthly salary 01
4,500.00
3 8010 Housing Allowance(25% Bas 01
1,125.00
3 8030 Transport Allowance 01
450.00
i have maintained 0027 for that employee...kndly advice if im missing anything here ,....
No Worries
KG -
Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments:CJ88
Hi Experts,
When I settle WBS Element cost to the Asset Under Construction using transaction CJ88, I receive following error.
AA571 Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments.
Please help.
Thank You.Hi,
first please check if the message AA 571 is right:
- Please check table ANLC. If ANLC-KANZA + ANLC-ANSAZ < 0 AA 571
- Check asset values (AW01N, ANEP, ANLC) and find out where the negative down payments come from (tty 180, 181)
However, in some cases a negative down payment balance cannot be avoided (for example through translation differences in foreign currency areas). This is the problem of AA 571. Sometimes it is not justified. For this
cases we have the following note:
860038 Error AA571 not justified
Using SM30, for the T100S table, create an entry for the message
class AA, message number 571, allowed message type "AEW" and
standard message type "E". Select the entry as 'Switch off'.
If when you post to a fixed asset the down payments are negative, or
become negative through the posting, you continue to receive an error as
a default with these changes.
Recommended procedure:
o Change this message to a warning message for one or several
special users. This user should then be used to post to any such
fixed asset that has down payments that are already negative or
become negative through posting.
o This should only be permitted in the cases where a negative down
payment balance cannot be avoided due to foreign currency
rounding.
regards Bernhard
Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Feb 11, 2011 9:27 AM -
IR not balance was posted but not blocked for payment
Dear all,
Kindly help.
I have PO , with GR amount of 1000, then tried to post IR amount higher than the 5% tolerance limit
PO/GR amount = 1,000
IR amount = 1,500.00
in this case when i simulate and check, i get the message Balance Not Zero , so I cannot post.
But when i use the function in this path EDIT > ACCEPT and POST , i am able to post and NOT Blocked for Payment.
Why is this so?
Please help. Hope i explained this clearly.
thanks in advance.Hello
Please note that in MIRO if you post invoices choosing Edit- >Accept and
Post, then this procedure overwrites all other settings. Your invoice
will be posted regardless of the tolerances, etc.
Please, check the attached notes:
394370 FAQ: Invoice release - frequently asked questions
333930 MR3M/MIR4: Display of payment block
377306 MIRO/MRBR: System behavior in the case of invoice
SAP's explanation on this is as follows:
The system design is such that it only checks the blocking reasons at
the initial invoice verification. This was to avoid the release
functionality being too complicated and hence difficult to design. In
this case, the system still recognises the block as being valid as it
is referring to the initial invoice and it will have to be manually
released only. I hope this has cleared up any confusion you may have
regarding this issue.
In conclusion, it is only possible to automatically release invoices
if their blocking reasons are no longer valid. This can be the case for
invoices blocked due to quantity, price, or schedule variances, or due
to quality inspection.
You can only use the function Release automatically for the blocking
procedure Blocked due to variances.
However, please note that if the 'GR-Based IV' indicator is set in the
line item of the PO, the invoice can not be released automatically.
The reason behind this s that with GR-based IV the system only
makes checks against each individual goods receipt rather than
against the invoice as a whole. If you need to use GR-based IV, then the
invoice will have to be released manually in MRBR.
I hope this clarifies the system behaviour
regards
Ray -
Accounting document not clearing even after payment posting.
In document flow of may cash sale process showing the accounting document 123-- Not cleared.
After payment receipts in FBCJ and posted & saved, eventhough the accounting data not clearing, but in FBL5N the report is updating, what can be the step i am missing to update the document flow TOP to BOTTOM cleared.
Waiting for your replies
Thanking you,
VeeraDear,
Kindly use the transaction F-32 (Clear Customer). Select both Uncleared items or document numbers.
Regards
Ramesh -
KO88:Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments
Hi,
We are doing Full Settlement of an order in TCode KO88. There are few Down payments against a PO. Initially, system gave an error as follows: -
You cannot post comp.retirement for asset 120002 0 with this trans.type
Message no. AA341
Diagnosis
A down payment was posted to asset 120002 0. In depreciation area 01, if
not elsewhere, all down payments were not cleared.
Procedure
Before posting a complete retirement on this asset, you have to first
clear the down payment in all depreciation areas.
We cleared the down payments and ran KO88 again, but a new error popped as given below.
Not possible to post down payment clearing. There are no down payments.
Message no. AA571
Any help will be acclaimed.
Regards,
CMC Team
Edited by: CMC Team on Jan 18, 2012 2:59 PM
Edited by: CMC Team on Jan 18, 2012 3:01 PMFriend,
Probably you did not take the trouble to search the SAP Oss for notes on this error message.
Please search for 'AA571' in the notes section of SAP oss and you will find several notes addressing the exact issue you are having.
For your convenience.
www.service.sap.com/notes
Best regards,
Vishal Thakur. -
Customer balance not able to clear in APP (F110)
Hi,
We have 4 line items in a document as follows:
PK Amount
04 40.12 (Opening balance)
17 4838758.27-
17 1531556.00-
27 6370274.15
The above document Customer & Vendor both are there and 3 line items are cleared.
1st line item 40.12 is debit balance and it is not cleared,
we put the baseline date as 24.05.2008 and we ran the F110 job and this item is going to exception list.
(It is showing Discount base 40.12 & No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist)
Can you please let me know why this is going to Execption list.
Best reagards,
MadhusudhanTry reset iPad
Hold down the Sleep/Wake button and the Home button at the same time for at least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears
Note: Data will not be affected. -
Payment run - should not clear the open item but should post payment doc
Hi Gurus,
Can you please help me , on how to acheive like when payment run F110 post the payment doc it should not close the open item rather keep that open item as open item , but hsould be be paid by payment doc posted through payment run F110.
Have any one of you had similar requirement ..? FICO gurus help me to acheiev this .. any exit /BADI ..or ideas..
Appreciate your help in advanceHI ,
Thanks for your reply , but still I am not clear on that.
reason they want to keep this open to be kept as open item , so that item will be picked up by dunning run ..
Basically the open invoice is being cleared by payment doc which was generated by payment run. If we look at BSEG in the open item record BSEG-AUGBL = will have the clearing doc number , and in addition to that BSEG will have created another record for the clearing doc as well .
May be since open invoice record is being updated with clearing doc (AUGBL ) , I belive its not shown up as open item .
Somehow this item should be kept as open item ... that is the req and also paid item payment reference should be transfered to Bill of exchange as well.
Hope you have clear background of my req...
Tnanks in advance ,
Maybe you are looking for
-
Equium A60 -199: ITunes and Mat****a UJ-830s (error 4280)
I am unable to burn CD on my notebook. This previously has never been a problem, however recently no matter what type of burn software I use I cannot burn to cd. I am currently using ITunes version 6 and after the cd burning process starts my compute
-
Disabling default function keys
Hey everyone, Long time mac user, just got a new Imac. Can't figure this one out. On my new slim keyboard, F12 turns my audio all the way up. How can I bypass this? In Dreamweaver F12 is the "preview in browser" shortcut and that is a bigger priority
-
APO (SNP)/BW Best Practices
Hi experts, I have several reporting requirements using BW and APO - SNP. I´d like to know what´s the best way to acomplish this requirements. Is it best to store the data first on infocubes on APO and then extract these data to BW, or use the standa
-
Daylight Savings time will be altered in 2007 as seen in http://geography.about.com/cs/daylightsavings/a/dst.htm Is Coherence certified to handle these changes? We have already found issues in the OS and JDK that need to be patched.
-
How to turn off Firewire drivers -- to make Quark 7.5 work
I'm trying to get Quark 7.5 working on a new iMac with snow Leopard. It works on some new Macs (I have it working on an MacPro), but can't get it to launch on a new 27-in iMac. On another forum (planetquark), someone said they were able to get Quark