Posting in accounting

Dear
All,
In our business scenerio, credit memo is raised and after taking approval as release strategy is there invoicing is done after 3-4 months, at that point of time system is showing error that posting period is closed, which is a standard process but due to that we have to do it manually.
Now my question is there any way out that system give me to do the posting without opening the peroid,be it configuration changes or any enhancement or exits.
Thanks in advance
Deepankar sengupta

Hello,
No, it is a standard SAP practice. The system will not allow back posting if the posting period is closed and it is very unlikely that the Finace will open the posting period for previous months.
There is another impact for the business if the posting is done for previous months. Almost all the business close their finace book entries in every month and send the consolidated report to the mgt. Once back posting is allowed, then it is a serious audit issue.
You can very well post the invoice in current period.
Regards,
SAM.

Similar Messages

Post on account in f-58 for customers

Hi all,
I have simple question. when i do "post on account" in f-58 for customers,when i go back and see in fbl5n for that customer i see that the amount is added to the open item where as when i do "post on account" for vendors the amount is deducted from the open items.
Can any one please explain me this concept.
Regards,
Sneha

Hello,
It seems that you making the payment (return payment) to the customer on the advances that you have received from Customer. You cannot make the payment on customer invoices as these are already debit items.
Regards,
Ravi

Invoice is not getting posted to accounts it is showing the export error

invoice is not getting posted to accounts, it is showing an error of foreign trade / export data. where as it is with in the country. it is maintained for the plants abroad stock transport order.

A stock transport order to a location overseas etails crossing national borders and change of legal regulations. hence you need to maintina FT data. Please check the FT data in the billing header and item and maintian them. They are simple items like customs offices meas of transport...
This will give you a green status from the red status you will initially have. Then you can post the invoice.
regds

Error In Posting to accounts - PF calculated wrong

Hi,
I am getting error in Posting to accounts- error - Posting balance is not cleared (Period -
Following Wage types are calculated wrong -
Expense
MF90 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 = 715,000.000
MF70 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 =6,500.000
Balance sheet
MF90 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 = 715,000.000-
MF70 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 = 325,000.000-
MF80 EDLI adm chrgs * 1,00,000 =6,500.000-
/3P2 Professional Tax Basis = 8,387.096-
Symbolic accounts assigned are as standard - no changes made
Please help me solve this.
Thanks in advance.
Monica

Hi Monica,
We have solved this issue in our company.
For this you have to create another wage types & make a "PCR" as it divide the 100000 amount from the technical wage types, & then instead of posting the technical wage types post the new wage types u have created.
Don't worry about statutory reports as in there SAP is using some factor which will give the correct value.
Regards,
Gaurav

Problem while posting to accounts on vendor account

Hi experts,
We have a wagetype "Advance deduction"
For the particuar employee we created a vendor account.
We ran the payroll successfully and we tried to post it to accounts.
Im getting the errors
""No creditor with serach key Companycode LFB1 PERNR
Has bben found""
No vendor found for this selection
Required field GLACCOUNT was not transferred in parameter ACCOUNTGL"""_
Eventhough we maintained the Vendor account for the particular employee.
Did i miss any config.
Please advice me to resolve the problem.
Regards,
V Sai.

HI Experts,
Im facing the problem in creation of a Vendor account for a newly created company code.
Through PRAA we have created the new vendor account for an employee who has advance deductions.
The system is showing the screen Create vendor master records according to HR master records.
Through XK03 i can able to see the created vendor.
Later i performed live run and posting to accounts.
there im getting the incorrect documents for the particular wagetype.
Where we have to enter a valid value in field GL_Account in parameter accountGL.
Please addvice me to solve the prob;lem.
Regards,
Vi sai.

Problem while posting to accounts.posting period 002 2010 not open

Hi experts,
Im facing problem while posting to accounting.
I ran the live payroll run and while posting im got the incorrect document.
System is showing the error message that ""Posting period 002 2010 is not open"""
How we have to open the periods.
Please advice.
Vi Sai.,

Hi vicky,
Goto t-code OB52.
Variant :Posting Period variant, Account Type : +, From Account : space, To Account : ZZZ..Z, From Period : 2,Year :2010, To Period :2, Year : 2010
Save.
Regards,
Dilek

Problem while posting to accounts..

Hi experts,
im getting the following errors after posting to accounts.The incorrect documents have been created.there were 2 error messages.
+1.No creditor with the search key 1100 LFB1 PERNR 00002338 has been found+
Message no. 3G213
Diagnosis
No vendor account could be assigned to the search key
Company code: 1100
Table: LFB1
Field: PERNR
Matchcode: 00002338
2.+Required field GL_ACCOUNT was not transferred in parameter ACCOUNTGL+
Message no. RW602
Diagnosis
Field GL_ACCOUNT is required in parameter ACCOUNTGL for processing the document. The document is incomplete without this field.
System Response
The document cannot be processed.
Procedure
Enter a valid value in field GL_ACCOUNT in parameter ACCOUNTGL.
Please advice me to resolve above 2 errors.
Regards,
Vi Sai.
Type the Error in the search forum you will get lot of threads related to this issue
Edited by: Sikindar on Mar 22, 2010 1:54 PM

Dear Vicky,
I m facing the same problem with some of employee no. and also the following error for others.
"No data was transferred in parameter ACCOUNTPAYABLE"
Kindly suggest me what should I configure to resolve this error.
Awaiting for your reply.
Thanks & regards,
Neeta

Error while Posting to Accounting

Hello Experts,
When I execute PC00_M99_CIPE for Posting to Accounting an error occured "Document Type is not permitted".
Payroll Status is EXIT Payroll in Control Record.
Please guide.
Regards,
Rajesh

Hi mohan, Thanks for your reply.
As you suggested we are maintaining Document Type "AB" which has worked fine for previous all payroll postings.
And FI module has also maintained the same.Do I need to change it to PY even then?
As you said to execute the Program RPCIPE01 instead, I did the same but again the system is throwing an error : "Country grouping from posting variant SAP is not permitted". Where to fix this problem in the system.
Please guide.
Rajesh
Edited by: Rajesh Sinha on Jul 22, 2010 8:58 AM

Posting to Accounts Receivable using WPUBON, when WPUBON contains tenders

Hi all!
My client has some special requirements when invoicing specific customers in SAP ERP using WPUBON from POS DM.
They want accounts receivable to be involved, even though the WPUBON idoc have all tenders/means of payment that is required to pay for the sales in same POS transaction. (Balanced invoice with as much tenders as sales).
What seems to be SAP standard, is that a WPUBON without tenders, will post to accounts receivable.
If the WPUBON idoc includes some tenders, but not sufficiently to pay for all sales in same idoc, the tender amount will post to a balance account, while the remaining sales amount (after deducting the available tenders) are posted to the accounts receivable.
If the WPUBON idoc includes all tenders sufficient to pay for all sales in same idoc, the tender amount will post to balance accounts, and NO postings are done to the accounts receivable.
This might be logical, but for my client and its vendors it prevents them from printing the account receivable statement periodically to check it against the vendors own accounting. (The account receivable postings will be missing for sales that are paid in full in store).
For comparison: When using Payment Card processing in SAP ERP, we create sales orders that are invoiced, and when the credit cards amounts are captured, we get a financial document that posts the invoice just as we want it for WPUBON. First the invoice is posted against accounts receivable (AR), and then we get a "counter-posting" against same AR account when credit card amount is captured and clearing account/balance account for credit card company is posted.
When involving credit card as tender in WPUBON, we get postings to clearing account/balance account for credit card company , but not to AR account as we do for the sales order/invoice in SAP.
Are there customzing settings that can be done in SAP ERP to make it similar for WPUBON idocs as for sales order/invoice in SAP ERP?
Are there user exits that can "force" SAP ERP to post to AR?
Thankful for any advice!
Regards,
Oeystein Emhjellen
tlf +4795 29 25 58

Hello ,
We are also struggling with the similar problem of reconciling the AR and i would seek your help here.
I believe you have figured out all the SQL queries used to get the AR recon done so i would request if you can share the SQL queries with me as it will help us to do our piece of activity in reconciling the AR.

Posting to Accounting: Retroactive Posting after a change in the GL account

Hello all,
i would like to ask you about a problem that we face in a live system throught the integration HR-FI. We have already run live posting to accounting until the end of November. But, the client wants us to change the account of a wage type. We have created a new symbolic account because the new account is an expense account whereas the previous account was a balance sheet account. We have used also the user exit in RPCIPE00 as we have different employee groupings in our system. The problem is that when we run posting to accounting for December and there is retroactive calculation the system debit/credit again the old wage type again without having results in December for this wage type.
Customizing :
01.2010-11.2010 DEBIT : X1(BALANCE SHEET)
                            CREDIT: Z1
122010-12.9999 DEBIT : X2(EXPENSE ACCOUNT)
                            CREDIT: Z1
Example:
11.2010 -> Payroll calculation for WT01:100 EUROS. Posting of this WT01: Debit : X1 (100EUROS) Account ,Credit : Z1 Account ((100EUROS)
12.2010 -> Retroactive calculation for november for other wage types. Not WT01. But in the posting to accounting for WT01 there is debit/credit. Note: After 01.12 we have the change in the posting customizing of this WT01.
              DEBIT                CREDIT
X1                                  (100EUROS)
Z1      (100EUROS)       (100EUROS)
X2      (100EUROS)
How can i stop the retroactive posting that takes place after the change? This wage type WT01 SHOULD NOT be posted in December.
I am looking forward to your feedback.
Thank you in advance.
Sissi

Thank you for your quick response.
I have already delimited Wage Type WT01 and used the new symbolic account:
Customizing :
01.2010-11.2010       DEBIT : X100 Symbolic (BALANCE SHEET)
                                  CREDIT: Z100 Symbolic
12.2010-12.9999        DEBIT : X200 Symbolic(EXPENSE ACCOUNT)
                                  CREDIT: Z100 Symbolic
FI: X100 symbolic Linked to X1 ACCOUNT
     X200 symbolic Linked to X2 ACCOUNT(NEW ONE)
     Z100 symbolic Linked to Z1 Account
The problem is that after posting for December i have 100 euros as debit in Account X2 (the new account) and 100 euros in the old account X1 as credit. IN Z1 account i have no problem as the result is zeroed. According to the customer, they should not have these amounts in X1,X2 accounts as there is no retro-calculation for this specific WType.
Accounts                  DEBIT                     CREDIT
X1   :                                <->                   (100EUROS as CREDIT)
Z1   :                    (100EUROS as DEBIT)               (100EUROS as CREDIT)
X2   :                   (100EUROS as DEBIT)                         <->
I hope the schema above will depict how the posting is performed after the change in account of the wage type.
So, you suggest that this cannot be ceased as the system works in this way?
Thank you a lot.
Sissy.

Credit memo on billing posted to accounting

Hi...
If I wanted created a credit memo on billing that already posted to accounting, do I need to cancel the billing first? This billing posted to acct on the previous closed fiscal year.
Tq
Henery

Hi Henery
It is not required to cancel the Biling document even if it is done in the previous period.
But, you have to see whether your organisation follows Release procedure(approval step) or not.
If your organisation does not follow release procedure then you can create the Credit memo directly refering the Billing document.
But if your organisation follows Release procedure then, first you have to create a Credit memo request (Credit memo request can be created with ref to Sales order, Billing doc or even without ant ref).
From this Credit memo request you can create a Credit memo.

Delivery free of charge Invoice should not Post to accounting

Hello,
As per Client's specific Business process , till now ZERO value Invoice(Delivery Free of charge) is created (This is not SAP Standard).
No accounting document is generated because of ZERO value of Invoice.
Only COPA Document is generated.
ZERO value invoice is generated because of all Pricing Conditions are Statistical in Pricing Procedure.
Now , Requirement is to create Invoice with Values & also Print values in Invoice, without posting it to accounting.
The simplest way to do it to remove Statistical check from all Pricing conditions , Values will start Printing.
But in this case ,Invoice getting started posted to accounting.
Q:- Please let me know the simplest way to create Invoice (Delivery Free of Charge) with values but on the same time , it should not post to accounting only COPA should be generated.
(AR Electronic Invoice)
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Vikas

Hi,
Free of charge Deliveries are basically of 2 types.
1. When you send Promotinal materials for display purpose, Physician samples in pharma industry etc.
Those materials do not have any commercial values, they are send free-of-charge.
We process those materials with Order Type FD (Free-of-charge Delivery).
2. Another case, when suppose you had sent 10 units of some material (commercially valued materials) for which customer has already paid the money to you.
After that suppose customer has found that 2 units are damaged or defective for which he has returned the 2 units to you.
Here, you have 2 options to compensate the customer, either you will issue a Credit Memo or you will replace with fresh units for those 2 returned units.
If, you will replace 2 fresh units to the customer, then it is called "Subsequent Delivery Free-of -chrge".
The Order Type used for the above is "SDF".
In this case, even though the material is a commercially valued material but we send it as free-of-charge as Customer has already has paid for it.
In both the above case, may it be "Free-of-charge Delivery (FD)" or "Subsequent Free-of-charge Delivery (SDF)", both the transactions are not relevant for Billing.
You can check the same in Sales document Item category KLN and KLX, both are not relevant for Billing. That means you can not create a commercial Invoice for those transactions.
In the above case, if required we create Proforma Invoice with reference to the Delivery document.
Proforma Invoice is a dummy Invoice and not posted to Accounting.
So, in your case you can create a Proforma Invoice.
Regards
Pradyumna

Posting of accounting entry related to Fixed assets

Dear All,
I have an issue as below:
We have implemented ECC 5.00 in oct,06. As part of implementation, asset management also has been implemented.
We have uploaded the asset values properly. At the same time we have posted an accouting entry through OASV to update the GL account balance.
It was observed that Fixed account and accumlated depreciation account has been posted with higher amount.
Value of the assets as per register 100,000
Less Accumulated dep.,                   10,000
Net value as per asset register          90,000
At the same time GL account balance has been posted as below
GL Account(cost of asset) :150,000
Less accumulated dep a/c     60,000
Net value as per B/s              90,000
When we compare asset register and GL balance, we could not find any difference as both are showing 90,000 only.
But when we compare cost of asset account(as per b/s) with value of the asset as per asset register we can found difference amount of 50,000.(150000-100000)
Same situation for Accumulated depreciation also. 50,000 has been posted excessivly.(60000-10000)
Now can some one tell me how to adjust the difference between asset register and b/s.
Is there any way we can get the individual balance sheet accounts to mirror the fixed asset register.
Can i post any adjustment entry through OASV as below
Accumulated dep account dr 50,000
cost of asset a/c                  50,000
Is it suggestble to post an account entry in 2006 as above.
Also let me know is there any side effects?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Prasad

You can post this entry. This makes your recon perfect. However, it may not be advisable to post in 2006. Please find out from your finance users and try to post in the beginning of 2008, since 2007 must also be closed by now

Invoices not posted for accounting(Error:Max. no of items in FI is reached)

Dear Experts,
I have an issue in the billing document.It is not getting posted for Accounting even it is 23(230)and in some cases it is 30 lines line items in it.
It is shoing the error as Max. no of items in FI is reached.
This problem is in Production client only.As we have seen and checked the setting in all the client. It is same every where.
Could any one help.
The SAP help says:The number of accounting line items are restricted to 999 therefore your billing document line items should be significantly less than that to prevent a failure to post an accounting document.
There are two options open to you, one is to split the billing document automatically each time a maximum number of line items are reached, take a look at IMG > Billing >Country Specific Features > Maximum number of Billing Items, then in your copy control line item Data VBRK/VBRP include the following codeu201D

Hi,
Check Note 36353 'AC interface: Summarizing FI documents', it give you ideas as how you can avoid this big number of FI items.
I hope this helps you,
Regards,
Eduardo

Posting an accounting document with material using BAPI (ver 4.6c)

Hello!
Can anyone help me out with this one please?
I need to post an accounting document using BAPI. Since the customer's SAP is 4.6c, the BAPI I found closest is BAPI_ACC_GL_POSTING_POST.
The posting has 2 specific requirements:
1. For the Vendor item, the tax needs to be calculated; and
2. For the G/L items, the corresponding material/quantity needs to be entered
So, my questions are:
1. How do you enable the "Calculate Tax" option, which is the Calculate Tax checkbox in F-02?
2. How do you enter the material and quantity for the G/L items?
Thanks a lot!

Hi,
Before posting your document please check first whether this is reversal or not.
please use BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_REV_CHECK to check reversal document
Have a Nice Day,
Regards,
Sujeet

Billing docs are 2x posted to accounting

Dear all,
I am currently struggling with the following problem - would be great if somebody could help me with ideas about the root cause:
VBRK-RFBSK -- 'Posting status'
Accounting relevance of export billing docs was set to D -- 'not relevant' due to wrong programming.
We have manually corrected RFBSK-status to A -- 'Relevant for accounting'.
T-code VFX3 -- 'Release billing documents for Accounting'
The documents could be posted to accounting some weeks ago. Now I was informed that billing documents were posted twice to COPA / FICO, causing a dysbalance as turnover was booked twice. Creating a credit note cannot be considered due to manufacturing costs etc.
Solution proposal from COPA support
...was to revert everything down to the deliveries, and then to create a correct billing document.
But reverting 1 document should of course correct 2 bookings! My expectation is that the billing index was not correctly updated when VBRK-RFBSK changed to C -- 'Posting document was created'. So the system ignored that posting was already done. (I am not sure about that, as I am not familiar to FICO / COPA processes).
Thanks again for your valuable help!
t.

Dear all,
could OSS note 1261286 solve the problem?
Please let me know your thoughts!
Thanks!
t.

Posting in accounting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for