Posting PDC confirmations

hello!
i transfer confirmations via PDC-interface into SAP. the IDOCs are posted and then processed by CORUPROC1. i recently found report CORUPROC - does someone know the difference between these two?
best regards,
matthias

HI Matthias,
Please check following. It might help to clarify the difference between CORUPROC and CORUPROC1.
CORUPROC:
The documentation for CORUPROC from SAP:
The program CORUPROC can be used to post preselected processes for confirmations.
The following processes can optionally be preselected:
1. Automatic goods receipt
2. Backflushing
3. Calculation of actual costs
The process "Transfer of confirmation data to HR system" always takes place using preselections.
Such preselections can result both from creation transactions and
cancellation transactions for confirmations.
You can use parameters to choose what type of preselections are
processed. If both goods receipt items and goods issue items are to be
processed then all goods receipt postings take place first to avoid as
many errors as possible due to missing stock with goods issue postings.
The program CORUPROC is normally used in periodically dispatched
background jobs. However, it can also be started online.
If the program is used in a background job then this is only by
specifying a variant to make possible the parametrization of the program
CORUPROC.
CORUPROC1:
There is no proper documentation available for this report.
Difference:
1. CORUPROC uses in ALV grid
CORUPROC1 uses in ALV grid
2. With CORUPROC you canu2019t define Interface origin (Data was created using a PDC system, Data was created using an online transaction, Data was created using a BAPI interface), Confirmations per work process, No. of parallel work processes, which you can do it with CORUPROC1.
3. In case of CORUPROC, OPKB transaction is used to select the required parameters which are not required for CORUPROC1.
Thanks,
Abu Arbab

Similar Messages

Termination during posting activity confirmation

Dear All,
Actually we have transported all the number ranges from Dev - Golden Client to Dev - Testing Client.
Now when we carried out few confirmations, we were not getting error as such. Suddenly if you see, we have got the error " System error: Termination during posting" while confirming the activity.
As such, we have changed the current number in transcation KANK - Check Number Ranges for CO Postings. Then, for the first confirmation it worked out and confirmation was saved. Again while doing the next confirmation, the same error persists and if we again change the current number in KANK, it is getting saved. Subsequently, when you carry out the confirmation again the same error appears.
Could any one help on this.
Regards,
Arun.An

Hi,
Issue resolved...
Solution is:
We have found that we have a number range problem.
Logistic confirmations generate the corresponding CO and FI documents.
In this case, system is trying to generate a FI document which number is already used in the system.
We solved this problem in your system in the following way
1th Transaction FBN1
2th Company code FA10
3th Press button Status
4th Select the number range 10 for year 2011 and modify the
current number
In our case it was 1XX13XXXX43 and I modified by 1XX1XXX250
Regards,
Kanthi Reddy

Posting labor confirmations against sales order and internal order

Hi,
We are looking for a functionality where in we want labor confirmations to be done against a sales order line item or to an internal order which is attached to the sales order line item. CS module is not in scope. So can anyone guide how can we have the functionality without CS module.
Thanks

Hello,
Labour confirmation can be posted through IW41, if the order type is a PM order or service order. If you wan to post expenses against sales / internal order (FI) , get in touch with a
Finace expert, he may be able to guide you properly.
Prase

How to post vendor confirmations

Hello,
I am getting vendor confirmations like Change in net price quantity and
delivery date through ORDERSP IDoc. These confirmations are able to see
in EKES table also.
But my client want these vendor confirmation should be directly posted
into the Purchase order.
Is there is any exit available for this. Is there any other way by
which? How can I realize this functionality.
Thanks and regards
Murali

Hi sai kumar,
Thanks for your reply.
Can you tell me where I can check confirmation control configuration.
Can I find it in SPRO
Regards
Murali Krishna

Posting order confirmation

Hi all,
   I need to post purchase order confirmation thorough portal. Can anyone tell me is there any function module/BAPI to post this. idoc_input_ordersp is there but what are the required parameters and how the idoc will be filled i dont know.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Animesh

Hello, I used ME_CONFIRMATION_UPDATE to insert new line in EKES. It worked but the issue is, I did no pass ETENS(Seq. no.) while inserting and now this field is initial in the EKES. Now, I'm getting dump in ME23N = BIT_OFFSET_NOT_POSITIVE at below code. I tried updating & deleting this record from EKES using the same FM but before it goes to update/delete, it performs below check and gets DUMP.
How can I fix it now? I mean, How to delete this entry or update the value from 0000 to 0001. Please Help.
* set bitmask by providing ETENS
METHOD set_etens.
define local data object   DATA lv_byte TYPE x LENGTH 1.
SET BIT iv_etens OF me->mv_bitmask.    ==>> DUMP at this line because iv_etens = 0000 which is less than 1
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.       RETURN.     ENDIF.
DO.     CONCATENATE me->mv_bitmask lv_byte             INTO me->mv_bitmask IN BYTE MODE."unicode
SET BIT iv_etens OF me->mv_bitmask.
CHECK sy-subrc IS INITIAL.       EXIT.
   "from do   ENDDO.   ENDMETHOD.
   "set_etens ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >
- Sonal

Post Report Confirmation

Does anyone have any suggestions on how to implement a confirmation dialogue box that would be displayed on successful completion (display) of a report being created as a PDF through rwservlet.
The dialogue box would be something simple:
Did the cheque(s) print correctly
YES NO
Regards,
Bob.

Same happens here, in x86. I noticed it when urxvt's perl support failed. Go ahead and report it.
EDIT: Check this thread about this problem. Reinstalling perl did the trick. Perhaps there should be released a new perl package to force people to upgrade and fix it?
Last edited by meqif (2007-07-05 09:26:12)

Posting a confirmed delivery date to web

Dear All.
We'd like to be able to promise a customer confirmed delivery date to the web based on SAP ATP. This should take in to account current ATP, and the customer's delivery service.
We've been reviewing bapi_material_availability. This seems to be promising based on availability very well.
However, what I'm not seeing is any transit times from the route, pick/pack time, etc.... taken in to account.
Does anyone know, should this bapi provide this and possibly we are using it incorrectly?
Or is this bapi limited to only providing ATP info only? Do we need to call SD_SCHEDULING as well.
Is there an easier way to provide a confirmed delivery date to the web?
PS - there's also bapi_salesorder_simulate. But it's more complex for the developers to use, and performance is not as good. But maybe this is the only alternative.

Material availability BAPI provides only ATP (same as CO09 pretty much). To my knowledge, there is no function that would provide ATP + transit time, etc. You would need to use ATP plus something else (perhaps your own code, based on the specific business requirements), shouldn't be too difficult IMHO.
There could be an Enterprise Service that provides this functionality, but it might require additional work to implement.
In any case, ATP + estimated transit time hardly seems a "confirmed" date to me. Many web sites provide "in stock availability" and transit times separately. E.g. maybe the customer would want to pay extra for faster delivery, who knows.

Evaluate button inactive during confirmation posting

Hi Friends,
I am working with SRM5.0.
I have defined a survey and a questionniare for VE during confirmation.
Have assigned a use group and a user with valid email address to the survey
In define events for VE, I have made entries for transaction category "confirmation" and have selected "procedure" as "individual-sel. via button".
I can call the questioonaire from SPRO using right click mouse button on user--> call questionnaire in WEB"
Also required SICF services are active and I am able to perform VE on portal using Vendor List.
With these settings, when I perform the VE for the specified product category, I am finding "Evaluate" button inactive during confirmation posting.
Any hint for my issue? Pls suggest.
Thanks
Regards,
Prashant

Hi Prashant,
1) In define events, trying keying in an "*" for vendor & P.Org, enter the source system as your SRM system. Did you assign the survey & questionnaire in this define events. Enter probability as 100. Then try to post a confirmation.
2) Defining a user group is not mandatory. Hence, you may try to delete this & re-try if point no.1 does not work.
Cheers,
Akash

PDC interface - PM/CS confirmation without Activity type

Hi,
We have a problem with PM/CS PDC confirmations in our ECC6 version of SAP. For PS & PP, the default activity type is populated automatically when doing the confirmation. But for PM/CS, the activity type is left blank. All three CONFXX idocs have no activity type specified.
The only thing I found regarding this problem/behavior is a OSS note, dated from 2001. OSS number is 0000381846. Is this note applicable for our system?
Is there someone who knows about this?
Thanks
Eric

Hi,
what you are willing to implement is not a supported functionality in the current Yard management.
If this is not yet the case, I would encourage you to open a SAP Customer message so that your question gets checked and analysed at development support.
BR
Alain

Confirmation error when again posted

HI,
A new problem comes on my way.....
A buyer is created a PO and for the same PO Confirmation was created with a FInal Delvery Indicator set On it but after 2 days Buyer Cancel the confirmation with 102 movement type and now tries to create a confirmation again but now system says PO is not available for confirmation.
I doubt is it because of final delivery indicator set system does not allow us to create a confirmation...is there any workaround available on this ?
Smriti
Edited by: Smriti arora on Apr 14, 2010 8:53 AM
Edited by: Smriti arora on Apr 14, 2010 8:54 AM

Hi Smriti,
Please check the follow on documents tab in the P.O item data for checking the cancellation of earlier posted confirmation or you can check for the same under the Purchase order history tab in the backend ECC system using transaction ME23N.
If the confirmation has been successfully cancelled then the same would be displayed in both the systems as mentioned above.
And the confirmed Qty and Value would be reduced accordingly.
Then you can untick the 'No further confirmations expected' check box under statistics tab of P.O item data in the change mode and order it again.
This would allow further posting of confirmations.
Please let us know the outcome after following the above instructions to help you further in case of any issues.
Regards,
Teja

Integration between SRM-Confirmation and MM-FI Closing in R/3

We are currently using SRM 5.0 through the Classic-Extended Scenario.
For some of our Company Codes in R/3, Monthly closing is performed before the actual end of the month ( generally on the 27th or 28th day of the month) by blocking posting in R/3-FI on the ending month (through transaction OB52).
This point generated an issue in SRM since it is still possible to confirm Goods Entries in SRM with a posting date on a period that has been already closed in R/3- FI (through tx OB52).
However, it seems that SRM does perform a control on the R/3- MM closure (performed through transaction MMPV) since it is not possible to confirm a reception with a logistic date on a period that has been already closed in in R/3- FI (through tx MMPV).
Could you tell us if, in SRM 5.0 with Classic Extended Scenario when performing Confirmation (Goods Entries) in SRM :
- SRM 5.0 provides control only on R/3 MM closure (performed through R/3 transaction MMPV) on the basis of the confirmation logistic date?
- Or if it also allows to check R/3 FI closure based on posting date (performed through R/3 transaction OB52) on the basis of the posting confirmation posting date?
Thanks a lot for your help on this.

Hi,
Forgot to tell you that i made the test already and the error message is displayed in SRm confirmation preventing you to posting the confirmation.
Kind regards,
Yann

Run time error while running BDC for production order creation and confirmation:

Dear Gurus,
We have a situation, where the users are trying to do the entries creation of order or confirmation (through manual and BDC). But, if there is any kind of a deficit quantities in consumption or GR quantity, then it is going to run time error and Dumps are coming in program SAPLCORB
and the transaction code is coming for CO11N.
How to avoid this error to run the production system in smoothing way...Any flash lights on this will be great full
Regards,
Madhu.G

Hi Madhu,
Expert Caetano has rightly point out. Refer Note 1840705 - RAISE_EXCEPTION short dump if running CO11N in background
Cause
The short dump is triggered because SAP transaction CO11N contains new GUI elements that cannot always be dealt with in a background process,
such as the confirmation texts.
Resolution
SAP recommends that the standard production order BAPIs, such as BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT, should be used to post a confirmation in background.
If this is not feasible, the following workaround may be uses:
Define a confirmation profile in transaction OPK0;
In the detail areas, remove the area "Confirmation text";
Set this profile as standard, so that it is chosen automatically by the system when a batch-job
is started;
Assign this confirmation profile to the batch user with transaction SU3 using parameter CORUPROF.
Also see Note 429432 - CO11N: Batch input in background dumps if long text is maintained
Refer to note 1154692 - Endless loop during confirmation in background if you doing Auto GR during confirmations
Thanks & Regards,
Ramagiri

Confirmation for Limit PO

Hi,
While posting a confirmation for limit PO, if I tried to add items from a catalog then I I am getting the error "Incorrect transfer of limit data from calling application". Are there any specific OCI settings required for this?
In the link https://websmp101.sap-ag.de/~sapidp/011000358700005436392003E.pdf ...I could see that there is a presentation for "Access to catalog via OCI during confirmation" at the top of page 4. But not sure where can I find that PPT in service.sap.com.
Could you please help me in this?
thanks,
Arun

Gil,
We found that, only service items can be added to limit confirmation as in backend R/3 service POs will get created which will accomodate only service items.
You need to create contract and catalog with service items. Then only it will get added to limit confirmation.
Hope this would help you.
Thanks,
Arun

Unable to edit Confirmation for a limit PO.

Hi,
This is related to Confirmation in SRM 5.00 for a limit PO.
The status of this confirmation is "ERROR IN PROCESS". I've seen that there is error while posting the SES to backend.
This is because of missing some field entries while posting confirmation, Now I want to change the confirmation and make corrections, but i find that all the buttons ( change, delete......) are inactive/greyed out.
Is it not possible to change a limit confirmation once saved and approved. Then how do i delete it, if all the options are greyed out.
Please help me

Hi Muthu,
Thank-you for the response.
Yes we have posted a confirmation again to get the process moving, as i knew that missing entries in the field caused the error.
But what I would like to know is why isn't it possible to delete or change this confirmation to correct the wrong entries responsible fo the error.
Why all the buttons are greyed out, though nothing is posted at backend
Edited by: Vaishav on Sep 20, 2010 12:22 PM

Material Ledger - confirmation in different months

Hi Gurus,
I have a problem as follows:
We are using material ledger for actual costing. When we post partial confirmation for a production order in period t, goods receipt and goods issue is posted for period t. However, in some cases, confirmation is posted although one material has not arrived at the factory yet and that material is not assembled on the finished product in period t, but it is assembled in period t+1. In this case, when we close material ledger, we receive an error as "there are nondistributed rows" in transaction CKM3. How can I solve this problem either in logistics side or financial side?
Thanks and cheers,
Fatih Zenginer

Hi Faith,
Are you familiar with transaction CKMVFM - Value Flow Monitor? You can analyze Not Distributed differences with this transaction. The price limiter is the key.
Thanks,
Greg

Posting PDC confirmations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for