PR should not be Firmed - SNP

Hi all,
As per SAP standard,when we run the SNP heuristic PR will come with PP-Firmed indicator.But my client's requirement is not to firm the PR after heuristic run provided it should be there in SNP horizon.How we can acheive this?Any OSS notes or exits for this.
regards
venkadesh

Hi Naren
EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_007 is not useful in my case,
I need to block the change/edit of closed PR, edit may be through ME52N tcode
Thanks for your reply
Chetan Shah

Similar Messages

Issuing plant should NOT receive any PRqRel but only firm Ord.DS in MD04

Hi Guru,
In STO scenario, lets say we have a plant A = Receiving plant & plant B = Issuing plant.
Business should not see/receive any PRqRel in plant B in MD04 screen but it should only see Ord.DS in MD04 screen.
Thnkx,
Edited by: Om.P.Singh on Dec 29, 2011 3:55 PM

Om,
I can't say, that would depend upon how they are being created by your company in the first place. They might have been created manually, or they might have been created during the MRP run.
If the Stock Transport Purchase Requisitions (STPRs) were created manually, you can either issue a policy to all of the appropriate people to discontinue creating them. Alternatively, you can alter their authorizations so as to take away their ability to create them.
If the STPRs were created by MRP, then this is usually a result of a deliberate planning decision to default the supply of materials such that they will be sourced from another plant, rather than through the more common sources of production or purchasing. Unless you have a good reason to change this planning decision, it would be unwise to discontinue the creation of STPRs by MRP. Such discontinuation would result in an unstable planning scenario in the supplying plant. Instead, you could create a batch job that could run immediately after MRP, which would convert all of your STPRs to Stock Transport orders. In this way, the supplying plant would never see the STPRs.
Best Regards,
DB49

Schedule lines should not change 3 weeks time from MRP date

Hi
Is there any specific customisation required to get following results in case of schedule lines.
1) MRP should not change/adjust the already send delivery schedule lines which are lying within 3 weeks time from MRP date
2) System should not allow to book the GRN unless the messages / print out has been generated from the system in case of scheduling agreement.
Thanking you
Shantakumar
09944009752

Hi,
There are 2 possibilities:
1. use MRP fixing using planning time fences, this is done by putting the relevant settings in the MRP1 view of the material master
2. use the firming options of the scheduling agreement, these are set per material number that is entered in the scheduling agreement.
The GR can only be posted for schedule lines that have been processed aka output generated.
Regards,

Demand on VC material not visible in SNP planning book

Hi Experts,
Is there any way to plan VC (Variant Configuration ) materials in SNP at the group level ?
I will explain the scenario more in details below
I have an VC material say X. Material X has end product Y attached to it (material variant). When material X is cifed to APO, it appears as configurable product in APO & is a top level product. Now when I create a demand on material X through DP, the demand appears in product view (RRP3). However the demand does not appear in the SNP planning book nor it gets selected during background planning run. The system is configured as Variant Configuration & not CDP.
Is it possible to plan material X in SNP ? If possible how can the demand be read in SNP ?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Sandeep

Hi Sandeep,
One of the limitations of Characteristics Based Forecasting is, CBF results can only be used in PPDS and not in SNP, hence it is not possible to plan that material X in SNP. Even though you use MC90 transaction which is release DP to SNP, but the data will not be available in SNP
That material X will be planned only in PPDS, there are two ways to plan, those are
1. one way is by releasing CBF results to active version using MC90 transaction, during this release, you should maintain consumption group in release settings and in product master, in this case you have to use Forecast Check/Allocation check as a part of ATP/GATP, here you can not use CTP or MATP
2.the other way is by releasing CBF results to inactive version using MC90 transaction, during this release you should not define consumption groups, generate the dependent requirements in inactive verison using heuristics in PPDS , and convert dependent requirements from inactive version to Forecast - active version using /SAPAPO/DMP2 transaction, in this case you can use MATP/CTP as a part of GATP
-Deepak

Child part demand for Subcontractor parts not reflecting in SNP

Hi
I have a situation where the demand for child parts are not reflecting in SNP.
The demand for the parent parts are visible in SNP, but the demand in turn is not being reflected against child parts that are Subcontractor parts.
The demand for child parts are visible in R/3 and in Product View (/SAPAPO/RRP3 - Product View) in APO, but not in the planning book.
Please can you assist me.
Thanx in advance.
Keegan

Hi Gaurav
Let me give you further detail to explain the problem.
Child part - A
Parent part - B
Finished Product - C
Step 1 - We purchase part "A".
Step 2 - We supply part "A" to subcontractor supplier,
who after processing part "A" supplies back to us part "B".
Step 3 - We issue part "B" to finished product "C" ,as part "B" is a BOM component for part "C"
The problem we face is that when Demand for part "C" comes through, it in turn places Dependant Demand on BOM compnent part "B".
The APO SNP system then raises Purchase Reqs for part "B" which is placed on our Subcontractor supplier.
However the demand for part "B" is not distributed to part "A" which we need to raise Purchase Reqs for as it is needed to be supplied to Subcontractor to process for us and then in turn supply back to us part "B".
Please advise as to how we can distribute the demand for part "B" to part "A" as there is a 1 to 1 ratio, so for every 1 part "A" we purchase and supply to Subcontractor, we raise a Purchase Req against the Subcontractor to receive back 1 part "B" which we issue to Production order for finished part "C".
Also please let me know what the settings in the R/3 material masters should be for part "A"and "B" on tabs MRP 1, 2, 3 and 4
Please let me know if there is any other info you require from me, to assist me.
Thanx in advance
Keegan

How to prevent for a particular org manually created IR/ISO should not be considered for Constrained EDD plans

We have a situation that around IRs with ~500 parts which manually created in Org A and ISO Created in Org B and ISO picked as well. But due to some reasons, shipment will get delay for 1 month and till that time plan should not be considered this IR' as supply in Org A.
Currently our Constrained EDD plan is considering this IR quantities as supply for the Org A demands and not generating any Planned orders. Seems we don't option to firm IRs by changing the need by date after 1 month. Also its not respect the need by date of IR and its getting reschedule in action and pegged to the current Demand in Org A. Please advise if you have any thoughts.

We have a situation that around IRs with ~500 parts which manually created in Org A and ISO Created in Org B and ISO picked as well. But due to some reasons, shipment will get delay for 1 month and till that time plan should not be considered this IR' as supply in Org A.
Currently our Constrained EDD plan is considering this IR quantities as supply for the Org A demands and not generating any Planned orders. Seems we don't option to firm IRs by changing the need by date after 1 month. Also its not respect the need by date of IR and its getting reschedule in action and pegged to the current Demand in Org A. Please advise if you have any thoughts.

Field should not display in the subtotal row in ALV report after sorting .

we have a requirement, after sorting and subtotaling, the output in ALV is -
vbeln        amount1 amount2 amount3
123           11              12            13
123           12             13             14
123           23             25             27
133           11              12            13
133           12             13             14
133           23             25             27
Now the customer wants the ALV outpput in this fashion -
123           11              12            13
123           12             13             14
                 23             25             27    --->123 (vbeln) should not come in subtotaling row
133           11              12            13
133           12             13             14
                  23             25             27--->133(vbeln) should not come in subtotaling row

Hi,
if it helps you could create a hierachy. In this way you can define the field catalog for the lines and for the subtotal columns. The only thing is that you would always show the subtotal rows.
You have references of hierachy alvs in
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c060fcb4-2c62-2b10-d2b2-f32407a5cc6f
ALV Hierarchy
alv hierarchy
In this case it also sorts
Sorting for ALV hierarchy
I hope it helps.
Edited by: Oscar Pecharroman on Aug 2, 2010 1:13 PM

Free Goods Should not down MAP -

Hi, MM / FI Gurus!
We have a scenario where Vendor offers a Discount in Kind. For e.g. For Order Qty over 1000 Pcs vendor offers 10 Pcs free over each 100 Pcs. Assuming PO price as 10 units then for 1200 Ordered Qty vendor delivers 1200 + 120 = 1320
In PO the Free Goods are determined correctly (in either cases whether Inclusive / Exclusive). Order quantity in first line has a gross price determined. The second line tiem in PO has Free Goods Quantity determined as per procedure for Discount in Kind, with zero price.
When we do GR the Inventory is up by Order Quantity + Free Goods Quantity.
Automatic posting in MM determines the GL correctly.
Dr Inventory - Drugs and Meds: 128010 Amt 12000 Curr
Cr GR/IR Clearing:                               200060 Amt 12000- Curr
As expected MAP goes down due to Free Goods (Zero Price)
Client wants to up the inventory for by Order Qty + Free-Goods Qty but this should not down the MAP as well.
I have activated Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts for Incoming Invoice
Idea was to Credit Gross Price on the Free goods Quantity to Inventory - Drugs and Meds: 128010 to make up the MAP in material master and Debit the same amount to Other Income as follow:
Dr GR/IR Clearing: 200060 Amt 12000 Curr
Cr Vendor Account:                          200001 Amt 12000- Curr
Dr Inventory - Drugs and Meds: 128010 Amt 1200 Curr (Free Goods)
Cr COS-Drugs & Med:                         500100 Amt 1200- Curr (Free Goods)
However we cannot post Gross-price for Free goods Directly on the same GL(which has Automatic posting Checked) to Up the MAP (which falls down because of free goods having zero price).
Is there any way in FI to have both Automatic and Manual posting for the same GL?
Also I am not sure that after we do this if MAP will be Up.
Is there any other way may be by using Movement Type for such Movements?
Thanks
Atul Sonalkar

Hi Atul
Create PO only for the material for which you are going to pay your vendor.
ie., for 1000 units @ Rs. 12 = 12000. Post GR.
Now you are getting 100 units free. Don't enter this in your existing PO. Create a new PO for the free goods and post GR.
Your MAP related problem will be solved.
Regards
Rajesh
Do reward if this is useful.

Free goods should not determine in sales order

Hi,
I have maintained the free goods determination in SAP CRM with validity period in T Code: /sapcnd/gcm and have created a quotation for the material which has a free goods validity.The free goods are determined at quotation level, when i was converting the quotation to the sales order the free goods validity period got expaired.In this case the free goods are should not get determined in the sales order.But when i test it in IDES system the free goods are getting determined in the sales order eventhough free goods validity period expaired.
Can any one tell me how to restict the free goods in the sales order level when the validity period expaired at the time of sales order create.
Regards
Nagaraju

Hi ,
You can use the BADI CRM_COPY_BADI. Here you can implement the check for products which are free and have expired to be excluded from copying from quotation to sales order.
Regards
Kavindra

My iPhone 4 will not sync my new voice memos from the "Voice Memos" app to my computer. This is frustrating, should not be so hard, can someone please help. I use PC with windows 7 with iPhone version 6.1.3 and iTunes most recent. Thanks.

My iPhone 4 will not sync my new voice memos from the "Voice Memos" app to my computer. This is frustrating, should not be so hard, can someone please help. I use PC with windows 7 with iPhone version 6.1.3 and iTunes most recent. Thanks.

In the Music tab of iTunes, do you have 'Include Voice Memos' checked?

Work order should not update the fields in PR

Hi Gurus
My requirements is that workorder should not updates the purchasing data fields in PR do not go to the shoping cart. How can make it possible.
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
I am not sure of your requirement clearly but check up the below user exits :-
COZF0001 Change purchase req. for externally processed operation
COZF0002 Change purchase req. for externally procured component
or BADI :- IWO1_PREQ_BADI BAdI for Manipulation of P.Reqs from Orders + Networks ,SE18
regrds
pushpa

ER Contribution should not Deduct from EE SAL and not Display in Payslip.

Hi Experts,
I have Pension ER contribution Wage type:
1. That should not deduct from Employee SAL
2. Should not display in Payslip.
3. Amount store in RT.
What changes i should do in V_T512W_D table
Appreciate your early response.
Regards
Raj

Hi,
We are maintaining the EE & ER contribution.
EE is working fine with all the validation & deducting from employee every month.
When we are handling ER contribution that amount is getting deducted from EE sal.
So we want to restrict ER contribution Deducting from employee sal and not to display in Payslip.
Figuring out how can we handle this thru Processing, Cumulating or Evaluation class.
Kindly advise
Regards
Raj

Attachments in PRs/POs should not be deleted

Dear All
Attachments in PRs and POs should not be deleted. Is there any control for this?
Thank you

Hi Jack,
SAP Note 49127 - cost center account assignments in asset accounting.
I couldnot find information on deletion of attachments in Purchasing documents PR/PO.
Can you guide me please
Regards,
Mavs

GRPO Qty should not exceed +/- 10% of Purchase Order

Hi All ,
Need Store procedure for GRPO QTY should not deviates +/-10% of the Puchase Order Qty.
Ashish Gupte

hI Ashish,
You can use OPOR , POR1 , OPDN AND PDN1 TABLES AND LINK THEM WITH
DOCENTRY , BASEREF , AND LINENUM FIELDS WITH THE CONDITION OF QTY DEVIATION.
Let me know if this works.
Thanks
Malhaar

PO Qty should not Amended after GR

Hi friends
i have to do PO Qty should not Amended after GR finished . IS there any BADI Enhancements points please let me know i guess
this is BADI ME_PO_PRICING_CUST i have tried it but it is not working for me or i missing some thing .please give suggestions what i need to do .And the same time there is also required for particular user it should be allow to change
REgards
Rk

Hi when GR is done and it is allowing to change it comes under PO amendment
ask functional if amendment can be stopped
regards
m.a

PR should not be Firmed - SNP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for