Prepayments in AP for LCM enabled organizations

Hi everyone.
I have a requirement of making payments (invoicing) after the PO has been created and approved but material has not yet been received against it, hence there are no receipts.
It means supplier wants company to make certain % of payment in advance (10%, 20, 30 or 100%) before releasing the material.
But all my inventories are LCM enabled which means 2 way matching cannot work.
How to do prepayments in this scenario ?
What steps/setups I need to make in oracle purchasing to accomplish this ??
Regards,
Muhammad Nouman Shaikh
KSA

You can try creating Prepayment type of invoice match with a PO. This way, your prepayment will tie to the PO but not look for 2/3 way matching. Once you receive material and supplier sends you final invoice, you can match invoice with the PO and then apply prepayment to reduce unpaid balance on invoice.

Similar Messages

  • API / Interface for Global BPA enable organization

    For Global Blanket Purchase Agreement (GBPA) , this is "Enable Organizations"
    Form : BPA -> Tools ->Enable Organizations
    Is there API or Interface for this data conversion/import?
    PS. the table for this data is "po_ga_org_assignments"
    Regards!
    Lumen
    Edited by: user10878056 on Feb 28, 2013 9:14 PM

    Anyone have any idea of it ?

  • Suggestions for PSE 11 Organizer

    Greetings from a new member. Not sure how to post some usability suggestions for PSE 11 Organizer, but here goes... I realize others have already posted similar comments, which triggered further discussions. However, my intent is just to bring these simple, but to me important, suggestions to the attention of the developers of PSE 11.
    I have used PSE on Windows XP starting with PSE 4, then PSE 7, and very recently PSE 11. Earlier this year, I switched to a Mac OS X system and transferred my photos and PSE 11 catalog to PSE 11 on the Mac. I followed the backup/restore instructions on the PSE support site and am mostly quite happy with the results. However, I’m disappointed that the following usability features of PSE 7 organizer are missing in PSE 11 organizer (on both Windows and OS X). Note that I plan to use PSE on OS X exclusively from now on.
    In PSE 7, when right clicking on one or more selected photos, the popup menu listed “View photos in full screen”, but it no longer does so in PSE 11. Although Full Screen is available on the View menu, having it on the popup would be even more useful.
    In both PSE 7 and PSE 11, that same right-click popup menu lets you REMOVE selected photos from an album. It would be great if the popup menu would also let you ADD selected photos to an existing album.
    In PSE 7, I could display the album list simultaneously with folder hierarchy/tree view (there was no folder list view in PSE 7). In PSE 11, the album list is visible only with folder list view. This makes it impossible to drag photos to an album from folder hierarchy view. Please fix PSE to display the album list simultaneously with folder hierarchy view.
    I suggest that the default folder view be folder hierarchy (not folder list). Or even better, let the user choose the default folder view in Preferences.
    Starting with PSE 4, I organized my thousands of photos in several main folders and hundreds of subfolders. Many subfolders have the same name, and frequently the subfolder name is a date. Because the PSE 11 folder list view doesn’t show the hierarchical context, folder list view is just clutter and completely useless for me. As recommended in other posts, I do intend to start using tags/events/places and other suggested ways to organize my photos. However, this will be in addition to (not instead of) using folders. I like organizing my photos in folders, just as I like organizing my other files (text, spreadsheet, etc.) in folders. Also, categorizing photos via tags, places, events, etc. is not equivalent to, and does not replace, using folders. For me, categorizing in this manner is an additional usability feature to using folders.
    Thanks for listening...

    My own answer will be about :
    ARJNA wrote:
    Starting with PSE 4, I organized my thousands of photos in several main folders and hundreds of subfolders. Many subfolders have the same name, and frequently the subfolder name is a date. Because the PSE 11 folder list view doesn’t show the hierarchical context, folder list view is just clutter and completely useless for me. As recommended in other posts, I do intend to start using tags/events/places and other suggested ways to organize my photos. However, this will be in addition to (not instead of) using folders. I like organizing my photos in folders, just as I like organizing my other files (text, spreadsheet, etc.) in folders. Also, categorizing photos via tags, places, events, etc. is not equivalent to, and does not replace, using folders. For me, categorizing in this manner is an additional usability feature to using folders.
    The fact is that the Organizer has been built historically on a database to manage keywords and categories with some additional tools to enable folder browsing and managing. Note that for other types of applications like word processors or spreadsheets, you have the same choice with using keywords or folder structures.
    So, where are we in version 12 ? From what I am reading today, I'll risk a few guesses.
    - I am convinced that most people relying like you on folder organization don't use the Organizer or have given up using it.
    - A great part of the critiques about the Organizer come about people not understanding the idea of catalogs and categories/keywords (I know that is not your case)
    - Anoter great part of the critiques is that the implementation of folder organizing in Elements has aliways been lame and buggy.
    What's new in PSE12 is that the folder view has been completely rebuilt. And the result is perceived differently depending on your camp : database or folders...
    - For Folder tenants, the result is two-sided. They are happy to have the folder view with all trees back - They don't see the point of the folder list - They are not happy with the new interface based on new categories (people, events...) - They miss the link between albums and folders as you have mentionned
    - For database tenants, the main advantage is that a lot of bugs have been corrected and that they can use the folders view and folder list as a secondary tool for organizing. The folder list (a feature I had requested) is a great tool for those wanting to migrate from a folder organization to a database one. Usually, the folder names are significant and enable very fast keywording and constitute a powerful search tool.
    - For both camps, the common grudge is the loss of alphanumerical sort order in folder view. I don't care personnally, but I think it's necessary for people working on scans.
    So, my wish is that the next version of the Organizer can satisfy people like you,so that much more people use and are happy with the Organizer

  • SRM 3.0 integration with XI 3.0 for Supplier enablement scenario

    Hi,
    Iam trying to integrate SRM 3.0 with <b>XI 3.0</b> for Supplier Enablement Scenario. Can anyone please help me with the documentation for the same? I have downloaded documentation for SRM from service.sap.com/ibc but it contains steps only for XI 2.0.
    Does anyone have the steps for XI 3.0?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Manish

    Vadim
          We are looking to integrate SRM 4.0 with R/3 ( ECC 5.0 ) using XI 3.0. I went to service marketplace to look for XI process content for SRM 4.0 - I could find XI content for SRM 2.0 only.
    1) Do you know where SAP pre-delivered XI 3.0 process content can be downloaded from ?
    2) Would you be having the cookbooks- possibly for all scenarios for SRM 4.0
    If you could forward /give pointers to the above , I would appreciate your help. My yahoo id is [email protected] 
    Thanks for your help in advance.

  • Creation of Material for multiple sales organizations

    Hello,
    is there a way to create a material for one sales organization and that this material can easily be copied
    to other sales organisations? Now it takes a lot of time to create the materials for different sales organizations with
    transaction MM01. Thanks in advance,
    Ivo

    is 5 seconds a lot of time?
    make use of copy from fields in MM01 initial screen, enter as copy from material the material number you want enhance with a new sales org view.
    At the organisation pop-up make sure you enter the copy from sales org and plant on the right.
    next step is just to go into the material and click save button.

  • How I restrict Scheduling agreement type for specific Purchase organization.

    Hello Experts,
    I have created Scheduling agreement type (ZLT). I want to restrict this agreement type for specific purchasing organization.
    I have search many threads but I didn't get solution.
    Is it possible through Configuration or user exit.
    Kindly give me solution in details.
    Thanks,
    Ranjit Kumar.

    hi,
    I don't think that there is standard configuration to restrict Purchasing document type for purchasing group. you can restrict this trough user authorization or you can make user exit development.
    Regards,
    mukesh

  • User attributes are not available for not root organizations

    Hello,
    my scenario: I have following organizations in IDM: Top; Top:Economy; etc...
    I created Admin role "Economy director" with this settings:
    Controlled Organizations - "Top:Economy"
    Capabilities - "Account Administrator" and "Waveset administrator"
    Now I assign this role to user A. This user A is in organization "Top:Economy" and he tried to edit user B in "Top:Economy". When I log in as user A I see in admin interface "Accounts->List Accounts" only Economy organization. In this organization I click on user B and select tab "Attributes". But here is no global attributes to change.
    When I change "Economy director" role - Controlled Organizations to "Top" then user A can change global attributes of user B. But now user A can change everybody attributes in whole organization tree.
    It's correct? I need to set user A to change attributes only for users in organization "Top:Economy".
    Thanks for advice.
    Petr

    This sounds like a question for forum: Sun Java System Identity Manager
    But anyways... the "Attributes" tab is a collection of all the unreferenced attributes of all the resources assigned, it has some special behaviors.
    You should have been able to change fname, lname, email of User B as User A (UserA is assigned AdminRole with Org & Capabilities assigned as described, without Top assigned). If not, something basic is not wired between User A and the AdminRole. Possibly it's the version in use?? But, if attempted against Oracle Waveset 8.1.1, this should be functionally straightforward to get working...
    The Attributes Tab would only have attributes listed if there were roles or resources assigned with attributes the admin was able to see "in-scope". A resource with attributes (e.g. LDAP resource with a groups attribute) must be scoped for the administrators in the AdminRole to see/manage them per assigned capabilities.
    In the example, a resource with attribute "country" scoped into Top:Economy would allow UserA to edit UserB, update the "Attributes" Tab "country" attribute.
    Edited by: gregoatwaveset on Oct 13, 2010 8:09 PM

  • Approval workflow for creation of organization

    Hi,
    I need to configure an approval workflow for the creation of organization. When the admin tries to create a new org, the approval should go to a admin group. The org should get created only once approval is done. I have configured an approval workflow for the Xellerate Organization resource object. I have created an unconditional task where the assignment tab has the admin group. When I test it, the org gets created without going through the approval process. Could someone please tell me what am I missing?
    Thanks,
    Supreetha
    Edited by: Supreetha on Jan 22, 2011 8:38 AM

    You'll have to raise request for Dummy Organization. It's Order for Organization so will not appear for user.
    I am not sure the full flow/complete requirement of your.
    APMU, you want approval while creating Organization into OIM.
    This is not possible OOTb when you create ORg in OIM.
    You'll create 1 dummy Org
    1 Dummy RO "OFO".
    Attach one Object Form with this RO.
    Raise request for Dummy Org and Give the name of Org on the object form for which you want approval.
    In the provisioning workflow, use OIM API to create Org into OIM.
    Done !!!

  • How to disable IFD for a particular organization in MSCRM 2013?

    Hi All,
    We have a requirement to disable IFD only for a particular organization. Does MSCRM support IFD per organization?
    Thanks in advance.
    -Jai

    You cant disable IFD for a particular organization considering that its the servers which are configured for IFD and not the organizations.
    Regards, Abhishek Bakshi If you find this post helpful then please Vote as Helpful and Mark As Answer. Check my blog on https://mydynamicscrmblog.wordpress.com/

  • Vendor Blocked for Local Purchase Organization

    Hi,
    I have checked the vendor details in SRM and ECC. The vendor is not locked in SRM & ECC, still the User is getting the Error message that Vendor Blocked for Local Purchase Organization.
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Lovkesh

    Hello,
    To prevent a shopping cart being created with blocked vendors, you shall
    make an implementation in BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI. This badi is called for
    each refresh of ITS screen. Here
    Call FM BBP_ITEM_GETDETAIL by supplying IV_DOC_GUID
    The FM will return among others a table E_PARTNER.
    select  the corresponding partner related to E_PARTNER from table BUT000
    Check weather the BUT000-XBLCK and E_PARTNER are matching
    If yes, Fill ET_MESSAGES with an error message.
    I hope this information help.
    Thanks and regards,
    Gaurav

  • User can see all resources, not only Permitted for his/her Organization

    Hi,
    I have set three self-serviceable resources as Permitted Resources for a specific organization. So if I click on Permitted Resources for that organization I can see only those three...
    When an user of that organization clicks on Request New Resources, all self-serviceable resources are listed to the user, not only the Permitted Resources. I thought the user could see only the permitted resources...
    If I log as sys admin and Request Resources for an user of this organization, I can see only the three permitted resources.
    I saw the sql statement that OIM run to list the resources:
    select
    obj.obj_key,obj_name,obj.sdk_key,sdk_name, obj_order_for,obj_auto_prepop, obj_type,
    obj_allow_multiple, obj_self_request_allowed,obj_autosave,obj_allowall,
    obj_rowver, obj_note,obj_autolaunch
    from obj obj
    left outer join sdk sdk on obj.sdk_key = sdk.sdk_key
    where obj.obj_key in
    select distinct obj.obj_key from obj obj
    left outer join sdk sdk on obj.sdk_key = sdk.sdk_key
    left outer join acp acp on obj.obj_key = acp.obj_key
    left outer join oba oba on obj.obj_key = oba.obj_key
    where
    obj.obj_self_request_allowed='1' or obj.obj_key in
    select obj_key from acp where act_key in
    select act_key
    from usr
    where usr_key= 5 and acp_self_servicable = '1'
    ) and
    obj.obj_order_for = 'U' and
    (obj.obj_type='Application' or obj.obj_type='Generic') and
    obj.obj_key not in
    select pop.obj_key
    from pop pop, pol pol, pog pog, ugp ugp, usg usg
    where
    pop.pol_key=pol.pol_key and
    pol.pol_key=pog.pol_key and
    pog.ugp_key=ugp.ugp_key and
    ugp.ugp_key=usg.ugp_key and
    usg.usr_key in (5) and
    pop.pop_denial='1'
    ) and
    obj.obj_key not in (
    select distinct obj.obj_key
    from obj obj, obi obi, ost ost, oiu oiu
    left outer join orc orc on oiu.orc_key=orc.orc_key
    where
    oiu.obi_key=obi.obi_key and
    oiu.ost_key=ost.ost_key and
    upper(ost.ost_status) <> 'REVOKED' and
    obi.obj_key=obj.obj_key and
    oiu.usr_key in (5) and
    obj.obj_allow_multiple='0'
    ) and
    obj.obj_key in
    select distinct obj_key
    from pkg
    where pkg_type='Provisioning'
    As you can see in the query above, if I change the snippet below the result is what I expect.
    obj.obj_self_request_allowed='1' AND obj.obj_key in
    Did I miss to set something or doing something wrong?
    Thanks,
    Renato.

    Sorry, but I do not understand your last reply. You mentioned the following:
    for option B, even when option A is unchecked, you can set self-request only for a specific organization when assign permitted resources.
    Isnt this what you wanted? You should set the resource as permitted resources in all the organizations whose users can request that resource. I have implemented this and it works just fine. It works for both types of requests. a) My resources -> request new resources and b) Requests -> Resources -> Grant resources.
    In case of b, depending on the organization to which the selected user belongs, the Resource is displayed. all resources are not displayed.
    So the solution is to uncheck in RO and put the resource under specific organizations permitted resources and make it self-requestable. It should work fine. Let me know your exact issue if it does not work this way.

  • Purchasing group transacting for multiple purchasing organizations

    Hi,
    I have a requirement in which i have certain purchasers defined as purchasing groups in my organizational structure. However, these purchasing groups perform sourcing transactions (e.g., bid invitation, auction) for multiple purchasing organizations. In the organizational structure, these purchasing groups are created under an organizational unit that isn't defined as a purchasing organization. They appear "free-floating" since they are not assigned to a particular purchasing organization.
    In sourcing transactions (e.g., bid invitation, auction), the list of purchasing groups from which I can choose from depends on the purchasing organization I select. Is there a way to include the "free floating" purchasing groups in the drop-down list?
    Thanks and regards,
    Joy

    Hi Joy,
    Its difficult to have a P.Grp with out a P.Org assignment.
    My idea would be:
    Assign this P.Grp to one of the P.Orgs (lets say POrg1). Add the entire root as the responsibility of this P.Grp.
    When the Purchasers in this P.Grp create a Bid Invitation, the POrg1 will be defaulted always.
    At the time of saving the Bid Invitation, use the "BBP_PGRP_ASSIGN_BADI" BADI to overwrite POrg1 value with any other POrg you desire.
    You may test it out.
    Cheers,
    Akash

  • Changes of the ZIP Code for the sales organization

    Hi All,
    I have done the changes of the ZIP Code for the sales organization by using the t code ovx5  the change of zip code in adress but when i rechek the changes in the order acknowledgement output there i can see the old zip code only.
    Please help me how to make the change the zip code to SO, so that i can view that in output.
    need to update pls help..
    Thanks for help
    Raj.

    Hiii
    Check weather your developer hardcode the sales organization pin code: else check the logic weathe Sales org Pin Code is getting from following logic. Go to table TVKO and put ur sales org number in VKORG field  then execute
    Get the ADRNR number and pass the same in ADRC table and get the POST_CODE1 as pin code number (give same logic to your abaper)
    Regards
    Shambhu Sarkar

  • Pros and Cons for single sales organization and multiple sales organization

    Hi!
    Does anybody have a good data of Pros and Cons for Single Sales Organization vs. Multiple Sales Organization.
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    Actuall it all depends on the business process.
    I will explain the answer to you through a practical example
    like Ford, it has sales and services all across globe.
    It is not advisable to manage all of its activities under only one sales organization, say Ford Inc.
    So what it does is de-centralises the whole process according to the country, region so that the whole process is divided and hence can be managed more effeciently.
    Hope this helps you in understanding the basics.
    One sales org always provides you with very less data to update and maintain, while many sales org makes the scenario more complex.
    One sales org always gives you the flexibility to bring any changes to the current scenario, while in multiple sales org to bring a change its a tiresome job.
    These are some of the advantages and disadvantages of one to many sales org.
    regards,
    Siddharth.

  • How to setup a routing rule for a specific file type for the content organizer?

    Hello,
    how can I set a routing rule for a specific file type, for example for "pdf" or for "docx", for my content organizer?
    As standard I can only choose for the rules the content type, name and title of the file uploaded.
    Thank you in advance!
    JohnyG

    Hi Johny,
    Based on your description, my understanding is that you want to create a routing rule for a specific file type.
    I recommend to create rules with the conditions as the image below shows for the Document content type(for example: .docx files):
    Best regards.
    Thanks
    Victoria Xia
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for