Price update in Scheduling Agreement

Dear Gurus,
I am seeking valuable suggestions reg the price update in scheduling agreement.
I am aware of the fact the the same can be done in the below mentioned ways-
1) Manually
2) Through condition records
I would be seeking the best possible option to the update the price in scheduling agreements, options would be
1) Manually @ item level
2) Changing condition records ( VK12) with same validity period
3) Changing condition records ( Vk12) with new validity period ( closing the old validity period)
This is because to avoid any inconsistency in the future.
Regards,
Ajit

Dear Ajit,
1.Manual entry -
Manual entry will be applicable in only some cases and you cant able to track if some one has changed the price and it is having limitation .
2.through condition records-
where as if you maintain the price through the access sequence and user cant able to change the price manually and for different combination and different material you can maintain different prices .here there is no limitation and you can extend this price for different combination in future .
Based on the above points you take decision.
Regards,
C.B Reddy

Similar Messages

  • Valuation Price error in Scheduling Agreement

    Hello Experts,
    I am getting inflated valuation while doing MIGO for delivery schedule.
    It always comes as more than price of material in scheduling agreement and varies from 1.5 times to 4 times.
    Example
    Material Moving Average price: 3
    stock : 0
    Purchase price: 3.05
    QTY RECEIVED 100
    Value of goods at the time of MIGO has 4.27 price
    I can give few more data
    Pr. Date Cat: 5
    Condition type is not group condition
    Moving average price changes to 4.27.
    This moving average price comes down to 3.05 once I do MIRO. But my , point is, why we getting inflated valuation at the time of GR.
    Please let me know if anybody has come across such issue
    Thanks and Regards
    Gyanesh Kumar Jha

    Allen
    please check the details
    Mater stock zero at the time of creation
    mov avg price 1 at the time of creation
    val class: 3000, price control V,
    scheduling agreement net price: 1.28(1.5 with tax)
    mat doc              mat no          mvt    date                qty   unit   value       Sch Agmt       item no
    5000002301     409031796     103     15.03.2011     100     EA     0.00             7500000075     1
    5000002302     409031796     105     15.03.2011     100     EA     256.41     7500000075     1
    Let me know if you can find any details out of this.
    Thanks and Regards
    Gyanesh Kumar Jha

  • How to update Purchase Schedule agreement

    Hi Experts,
           Please tell me the ,is there any Function Module/BAPI which updates Purchase Schedule Agreement(Transaction Code ME38) in SAP???
    Thanks..
    Debi.

    Hi,
    Please check this BAPI BAPI_AGREEMENT_MAINTAIN.
    Regards,
    Ferry Lianto

  • Update price condition in scheduling agreement (ME32L)

    Hi,
    I have to update scheduling agrrement (ME32L).
    The input data that i would like to update are price amount, validity start date and valdity end date.
    Is there any function or bapi which can be used to update.
    Any help in this would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Mandeep

    hi
    did you update the conditions and validity period of scheduling agreement?  If yes then plz send me the details of parameters
      ITEM_COND_VALIDITY           =
      ITEM_COND_VALIDITYX         =
      ITEM_CONDITION                  =
      ITEM_CONDITIONX                =
    I am also facing the same issue.
    waiting for your reply.

  • Vendor address not updated in Scheduling Agreement

    I have a peculiar problem where the vendor address is not being updated in all scheduling agreements. I have multiple SAs against a vendor. When i change the name of the vendor, the name changes only in one of the SA. All the remaining SA carry the old name of the vendor. I tested with another vendor on the test system and the names on all the agreements change as soon as I make the change in the vendor master.
    Does anyone have any explanation on why the system is behaving strangely?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I am more surprised that the name changed automatically on the ones that DID change.
    I would not have expected this to update in this way. The main idea is that outline agrements can have different data to the master records because they are specific agreements and often relate to very specific data.
    If you wanted to change the address of a vendor it should NOT change the address of existinmg VSAs etc. automatically because the document is  a =fixed contract that is agreed between you and the vendor and should ONLY be changed manually.
    We had a similar question earlier today asking why the system does not change the short description on a contract when the short description on the material master changes. My reply was basically the same, it SHOULDN'T change it automatically because the agreement is a legal document and cannot be changed by just ONE of the parties involved.
    So I would be asking  why the one VSA changed automatically (and the ones in the test syste) not why the others didn't change.
    Just trying to lok at this from all angles.
    Steve B

  • Document flow is not updated for Scheduling agreement

    Hi Gurus,
    Can you please advise on the below issue..
    Some deliveries created with reference of schedule agreement are not displayed in scheduling agreement in forecast delivery schedule under delivery tab and as well as not updated in document flow for VBFA table.
    There are two ways to create delivery with reference of Scheduling agreement , 1)  Create Delivery order (Order Type   : TAM) with reference of SA, then delivery for TAM order.
    2) we can add the line item in existing TAM order with reference of SA .
    Advance thanks for your valid points.
    Best regards,
    Venkat.

    Hi Ram,
    Thanks for the reply, there is no issue in copy control settings.
    Best regards,
    Venkat.

  • Auto update of Schedule Agreements

    Once a schedule agreement has been created will MRP auto update the delivery date (for JIT) if the lead time is zero days and the new need date is today?

    You need to check what is the procedure (T-Code) from which the data gets updated into these tables.
    For example
    when we craete a material from MM01 the data gets updated in the corresponding table i.e. EKPO.
    In same way you need to find the process and then you can use BTE (Busineess transaction events) for that process. BTE are only for FI module and these tables are also related to FI .

  • Price changes in Scheduling Agreement

    Hi,
    What is the best way to handle price changes in a Scheduling Agreement? From what I saw, the validity periods of the prices maintained in a scheduling Agreement is based on the GR date. Is there any way we can change this? The requirement is to make the validity price work on the delivery schedule date.
    Right now, whenever a price change happens, we have to add a new line in the scheduling agreement. This doesn't seem right. Please advise.
    Thanks
    Ranjeet

    Hi,
    Your date for pricing is controlled by Pricing date category u maintain in Vendor master >Purchasing view
    If you select delivery date as your pricing and if there are many delivery dates the first delivery date is taken as
    the reference for pricing
    But if there is no much price variation between delivery schedule date and Goods receipt you can keep that as
    goods receipt date
    Check out whatever suitable
    BR
    Diwakar

  • Price Change in Scheduling Agreement

    Dear All,
    I have created a SA for one material. Here we want to procure that material for 10 plants/Company codes. So i have created 10 different line items. After partial GR the price got changed for this material. Now I want to change the price which effects from today onwards for all the plants/CC. Is there anyway so that instead of changing the price in all the line items, i will change once, so that new price will apply to all the line items. Looking for inputs
    regds,
    CB

    Hi
    There are 2 options.
    Either you have to change the price for all the line item in the scheduling agreement
    Or Change the price in the Purchasing Inforecord for all the plants and set the price date category as 5-GR Date. And change price date category in Scheduling agreement as well. In future you can maintain the price only in the Purchasing inforecord.
    Since the valuation area is at plant level you have no option to enter the price in one place to effect on all the plants.
    Hope it helps
    Thanks/karthik

  • Unable to create new price validity in Scheduling agreement

    Dear Experts
    We are SAP 4.7 version.
    We have 4 companies and 17 plants in same client server.We are facing problem in a particular company having two plants not able to change price in scheduling agreement with validity period.But in other company code allowing to create new price validity period.
    Any configuration missing out please help us to resolve the issue.
    Most urgent
    SS

    Hello Suresh,
    There are two possibilities
    1. Missing authorization :Check if you have the same authorization profile for maintaining data in all company code/plant/purchasing organizaiton.
    2. Release streatagy: Check if you have activated release procedure in such a way that once it is release it will not allow any changes in scheduling agreement.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Arif Mansuri

  • Problem Regarding TABLE updation for Scheduling Agreement

    Dear Experts,
    We have noticed that whenever we are releasing any Delivery Schedule for a line item against a Scheduling Agreement the table field ABART(Scheduling Agreement Release Type) in table EKET is not getting updated,but the same field or column in TABLE EKEH or EKEK is getting updated.
    Please advice what is the problem and how to resolve the same.
    Regards,
    Soumick

    Hi,
    The scheduling agreement schedule line is not firmed physically:The fixing indicator (EKET-FIXKZ) is empty for this schedule line.
    This can be checked in Transaction ME39 or with Transaction SE16 for table EKET for the corresponding schedule line.
    In the MRP group of the corresponding material, it is set that only transferred scheduling agreement schedule lines should be regarded as firmed (Transaction OPPR, firming scheduling agreement, Firm transmSLines [Field XFAT1]).
    In this case, only such scheduling agreement schedule lines are firmed which were transferred by message transmission through purchasing to the vendor. (see also the F1 help for the field).
    However, the system displays all scheduling agreement schedule lines as fixed in Transaction MD04 within the release period and assigns them with a star ('*'), that is, this applies also scheduling agreement schedule lines with a transmitted quantity of 0.
    In contrast to the above, these schedule lines are not displayed as fixed in Transaction MD05 or in the planning with 'Display result'.
    Note 354164 explains this system behavior.
    For the planning, the transmitted quantity is considered as fixed if this is correspondingly set in the MRP group of the material.
    If the transmitted quantity was updated correctly, it should be contained in field AMENG of table EKET.
    By using Transaction SE16 for this table and the corresponding schedule line (scheduling agreement number EBELN, item EBELP, schedule line ETENR), you should be able to find out....
    transmitted quantity was written to the database and a fixing can be carried out correspondingly in amount of the transmitted quantity or whether no update of the transmitted quantity occurred (see below Notes 82169, 117093, 134356).
    Solution
    First, the system behaves as intended.
    It should be checked whether the function, which is controlled by this indicator, is actually wanted this way (to firm only scheduling agreement schedule lines which actually have been transferred).
    In addition, problems can occur in purchasing when the printed quantity is updated (AMENG).This symptom can especially occur after you have upgraded from a release < Release 4.0A to a release > Release 4.0B.
    In this regard, see the related Notes 82169, 117093 and 134356.
    Regards,
    Udaya.

  • Price Scaling behind Scheduling Agreements

    We create a Scheduling Agreement with reference to Purchasing Contract.
    Several of the Contracts have pricing scales behind the material, based on quantity ordered and these scales are also required behind the Scheduling Agreement.
    Our problem occurs when we goods receipt;  the valuation of goods is taken from the total amount being ordered rather than the quantity received e.g. The delivery schedule has a total scheduled quantity of 500KG; the price for 500KG = £3.50 per KG.  We have the first scheduled delivery of 250KG and a second to follow in 3 weeks.   The price for 250KG = £4.50 per KG.   The goods receipt of 250KG is valuated at £3.50 per KG but the vendor invoices us at £4.50 per KG.
    Is there a way to valuate the goods receipt in accordance with the price for the quanity received rather than the total scheduled quantity?
    We are using version 4.7.

    Hi Christine,
    I also found this User Exit EXIT_SAPLEINR_003.
    But i don't know how to pass in the GR qty which it is structure table (GOITEM-ERFMG)..
    I need to retrieve the qty to recalculate the price before the GR document is posting..
    Lina..

  • Cumulative Qty Received by Customer wrongly updated in Scheduling Agreement

    Hi All,
    I face a strange issue in Schedule Agreement[Forecast Delivery Schedule].
    The exact scenario is as follows:
    1)On 17/09/09, I saw a CmlQtyReceived of '249'.
    2)On 19/09/09, this value got changed to '141'
    3)On 23/09/09, this value again got changed to '249'
    I was not able to identify the reason for the '141' Qty getting displayed on 19th. Even if I go to Analysis now, there is no Forecast Delivery Schedule with '141' Qty to support the display.
    Do let me know the issue in this.
    Needless to say points will be awarded for helpful replies.
    Regards,
    Raj Kumar Reddy.

    Hello;
    I researched about this issue and I would like to recommend you to check the FAQ note about the most critical problems with Scheduling Agreements, note 923104.                                                                               
    As stated in question 2 (or also 3), you can check and correct the cumulative quantityes using Report SDLIPL01. Regarding this report, please refer to note 923105.                                                                               
    In addition, I kindly ask you to please check notes 922638 and 922639 about more details regarding the cumulative quantities.                   
    Also, read the follow notes related to fiscal year changes:
          336670    Avoid the fiscal year change (introduction) 
          332971    Avoid the fiscal year change (coding)      
    Well, I hope those documentation can help you a lot.
    Regards
    Ruy Castro

  • Price change in Schedule agreement but not updated in CDHDR and CDPOS

    Hi Experts
    We have change price in  SA ,please see the below screen shot. But these changes not update in CDHDR and CDPOS. We can see current rate in ME33L.
    Please guide how to update these changes.
    Regards
    Parkash Chand

    Generally in standard, the changes logs are saved into table CDPOS and CDHDR.
    Its working fine in my system.
    Can you see the changes log with regards to document number by running program RSSCD200.
    Go to SE38 or SA38, enter the program RSSCD200 then press execute.
    Enter * in object class and enter the document number
    Then press execute. You can find more details into the wiki content Steps to enable logging of changes in change documents - Code Gallery - SCN Wiki

  • Massive Price Update in Schedulig Agreements

    Hi all,
    I need a method/transaction to make a massive update of prices in scheduling agreemmets ( as I do for ex. in T. VA32 with the button "Update").
    Have you any suggestion?
    Thanks in advance,
    Flavio

    Dear Flavio
    run *VA05* with Further sel.criteria on Document type, -- click on "Edit --> Mass change --> New Pricing"
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

Maybe you are looking for

  • DVI/HDMI No Signal

    I'm running: Mac mini Core 2 Duo model (10.5.2) I recently bought a 42" Insignia LCD HDTV which has a VGA connector and 2 HDMI connectors, but no DVI. I want to connect it with a DVI to HDMI adapter, but when I do, I get no picture at all and the TV

  • Adobe PDF iFilter 9 for 64-bit platforms

    How do I search for a two word phrase as in 'style analysis'.  The software is finding 'style' and 'analysis' not the phrase

  • Icloud document sync broken on one account

    I hope the community has found a solution to this... i have two different icloud accounts. One, my main account, has 20gb of storage, and is my email address. The other, has 5gb, and was opened to test this issue. when i use the first icloud account

  • Difference between down payment & advance payment

    Hi frndzz.. I have lil' confusion on these two.   Advance payment is what you you pay to your vendor against the purchase order is raised. Later you clear this value against the invoice sent by your vendor. I see the same is applicable for downpaymen

  • ORA-01033

    Our Oracle Server database 9i and 6i form was working fine last one year but yesterday due to power failure server was down directly from switch and after that when we start again server and run our application it gives us error . ORA-01033 Oracle In