Vendor address not updated in Scheduling Agreement

I have a peculiar problem where the vendor address is not being updated in all scheduling agreements. I have multiple SAs against a vendor. When i change the name of the vendor, the name changes only in one of the SA. All the remaining SA carry the old name of the vendor. I tested with another vendor on the test system and the names on all the agreements change as soon as I make the change in the vendor master.
Does anyone have any explanation on why the system is behaving strangely?
Thanks

Hi,
I am more surprised that the name changed automatically on the ones that DID change.
I would not have expected this to update in this way. The main idea is that outline agrements can have different data to the master records because they are specific agreements and often relate to very specific data.
If you wanted to change the address of a vendor it should NOT change the address of existinmg VSAs etc. automatically because the document is  a =fixed contract that is agreed between you and the vendor and should ONLY be changed manually.
We had a similar question earlier today asking why the system does not change the short description on a contract when the short description on the material master changes. My reply was basically the same, it SHOULDN'T change it automatically because the agreement is a legal document and cannot be changed by just ONE of the parties involved.
So I would be asking  why the one VSA changed automatically (and the ones in the test syste) not why the others didn't change.
Just trying to lok at this from all angles.
Steve B

Similar Messages

  • Document flow is not updated for Scheduling agreement

    Hi Gurus,
    Can you please advise on the below issue..
    Some deliveries created with reference of schedule agreement are not displayed in scheduling agreement in forecast delivery schedule under delivery tab and as well as not updated in document flow for VBFA table.
    There are two ways to create delivery with reference of Scheduling agreement , 1)  Create Delivery order (Order Type   : TAM) with reference of SA, then delivery for TAM order.
    2) we can add the line item in existing TAM order with reference of SA .
    Advance thanks for your valid points.
    Best regards,
    Venkat.

    Hi Ram,
    Thanks for the reply, there is no issue in copy control settings.
    Best regards,
    Venkat.

  • Vendor field not updated in CRM pricing condition table

    Hi,
    We have maintained condition table with Material and Vendor fields in ECC and table is active
    After replicating this table from ECC to CRM, vendor field not updated in table and it is inactive.
    There is any mapping settings required to update vendor field in CRM table from ECC.
    Please help me out to solve this issue
    Regards
    kishore kumar

    hi,  the data field of vendor is a standard one or custimizing one?
    I remeber there is a data mapping setting in CRM, for condition field.   If you want to mapping a ERP standard field to a CRM custmizing one, you need to setting your rule in it.  Maybe you can find it in SM30 view.
    I can't login a CRM system now, so sorry for not offer your the view name.

  • Price update in Scheduling Agreement

    Dear Gurus,
    I am seeking valuable suggestions reg the price update in scheduling agreement.
    I am aware of the fact the the same can be done in the below mentioned ways-
    1) Manually
    2) Through condition records
    I would be seeking the best possible option to the update the price in scheduling agreements, options would be
    1) Manually @ item level
    2) Changing condition records ( VK12) with same validity period
    3) Changing condition records ( Vk12) with new validity period ( closing the old validity period)
    This is because to avoid any inconsistency in the future.
    Regards,
    Ajit

    Dear Ajit,
    1.Manual entry -
    Manual entry will be applicable in only some cases and you cant able to track if some one has changed the price and it is having limitation .
    2.through condition records-
    where as if you maintain the price through the access sequence and user cant able to change the price manually and for different combination and different material you can maintain different prices .here there is no limitation and you can extend this price for different combination in future .
    Based on the above points you take decision.
    Regards,
    C.B Reddy

  • Vendor is not updating in batch while doing STO

    Hi All,
    I created a PO with vendor 123456.Did a GR for it.
    In GR i maintained a batch AA1 and received the material. Now the stock is in A plant with batch AA1 and vendor 123456.
    Then i went in to batch AA1 and found that vendor(123456) was updated in batch master.
    Next i created a STO for moving the stock from one plant to another.  Stock transfer A plant to B plant.
    In STO also i used the same batch AA1  and in outbounddelivery i used same batch AA1 and in GR i maintained the same batch AA1 but plant B.
    Now i checked the batch AA1 for plant B.
    Here the vendor is not updated in the batch AA1 for plant B combination.
    What may be the reason.
    If STO is done system cant able to pick the vendor?
    KIndly help me in this regard.
    Regards
    KK

    HI,
    Thanks for the reply.
    Yes you are exactly correct.
    Is there anyother way that vendor can be updated in the batch?
    Regards
    KK
    Edited by: Kishore Kumar Galla on Nov 10, 2009 2:17 AM

  • Question regarding SAP note 765494 and Scheduling agreements

    In a SAP ECC 6.0 environment has anybody dealt with note 765494? It appears that the changes allow the user to change shipping data on stock transfer scheduling purchase orders using the ME22N screen (Enjoy) but not the ME32L scheduling agreement change screen. Does anybody know of a work around to change shipping data on a stock transfer scheduling agreement?

    Hi Mahesh,
    A contract is a type of outline purchase agreement against which release orders (releases) can be issued for agreed materials or services as and when required during a certain overall time-frame.
    Contracts are of two types:
    1. Quantity contracts - Use this type of contract if the total quantity to be ordered during the validity period of the contract is
    known in advance.
    2. Value contracts - Use this type of contract if the total value of all release orders issued against the contract is not to exceed a certain predefined value.
    But a scheduling agreement is a  form of outline purchase agreement under which materials are procured on predetermined dates within a certain time period.  A scheduling agreement consists of a number of items, for each of which a procurement type is defined. The
    The following are the procurement types:
    - Standard
    - Subcontracting
    - Consignment
    - Stock transfer
    Delivery of the total quantity of material specified in a scheduling agreement item is spread over a certain period in a delivery schedule, consisting of lines indicating the individual quantities with their corresponding planned delivery dates.
    Contracts and Scheduling Agreement transaction codes:
    Transaction codes:
    Contracts: ME31K to ME35K
    Scheduling agreements: ME31L to ME35L.
    Please award if helps!
    Thanks!
    preethi.

  • How to update Purchase Schedule agreement

    Hi Experts,
           Please tell me the ,is there any Function Module/BAPI which updates Purchase Schedule Agreement(Transaction Code ME38) in SAP???
    Thanks..
    Debi.

    Hi,
    Please check this BAPI BAPI_AGREEMENT_MAINTAIN.
    Regards,
    Ferry Lianto

  • Problem Regarding TABLE updation for Scheduling Agreement

    Dear Experts,
    We have noticed that whenever we are releasing any Delivery Schedule for a line item against a Scheduling Agreement the table field ABART(Scheduling Agreement Release Type) in table EKET is not getting updated,but the same field or column in TABLE EKEH or EKEK is getting updated.
    Please advice what is the problem and how to resolve the same.
    Regards,
    Soumick

    Hi,
    The scheduling agreement schedule line is not firmed physically:The fixing indicator (EKET-FIXKZ) is empty for this schedule line.
    This can be checked in Transaction ME39 or with Transaction SE16 for table EKET for the corresponding schedule line.
    In the MRP group of the corresponding material, it is set that only transferred scheduling agreement schedule lines should be regarded as firmed (Transaction OPPR, firming scheduling agreement, Firm transmSLines [Field XFAT1]).
    In this case, only such scheduling agreement schedule lines are firmed which were transferred by message transmission through purchasing to the vendor. (see also the F1 help for the field).
    However, the system displays all scheduling agreement schedule lines as fixed in Transaction MD04 within the release period and assigns them with a star ('*'), that is, this applies also scheduling agreement schedule lines with a transmitted quantity of 0.
    In contrast to the above, these schedule lines are not displayed as fixed in Transaction MD05 or in the planning with 'Display result'.
    Note 354164 explains this system behavior.
    For the planning, the transmitted quantity is considered as fixed if this is correspondingly set in the MRP group of the material.
    If the transmitted quantity was updated correctly, it should be contained in field AMENG of table EKET.
    By using Transaction SE16 for this table and the corresponding schedule line (scheduling agreement number EBELN, item EBELP, schedule line ETENR), you should be able to find out....
    transmitted quantity was written to the database and a fixing can be carried out correspondingly in amount of the transmitted quantity or whether no update of the transmitted quantity occurred (see below Notes 82169, 117093, 134356).
    Solution
    First, the system behaves as intended.
    It should be checked whether the function, which is controlled by this indicator, is actually wanted this way (to firm only scheduling agreement schedule lines which actually have been transferred).
    In addition, problems can occur in purchasing when the printed quantity is updated (AMENG).This symptom can especially occur after you have upgraded from a release < Release 4.0A to a release > Release 4.0B.
    In this regard, see the related Notes 82169, 117093 and 134356.
    Regards,
    Udaya.

  • Vendor information not updated in the PO

    Hello,
    I have a case where a PReq was created with a blocked vendor GE Canada then when the buyer converted the Preq into the PO before saving the PO they she changed the vendor to GE Canada (Not blocked) but when she save the PO it still kept the old vendor's address which is in Toronto instead of updating the address with the unblocked one which is in Calgary.
    What causes this?
    Thanks
    Ibou

    Hi Ibou,
    If it's only for that one PO, why not update the Vendor address in the purchase order itself?  I assume that all other purchase requisitions created after the change copies the udpated address already.
    I also tested the scenario in our system and it behaves similarly to your sandbox system.
    Cheers.

  • Partner Function not picked in Scheduling agreement.

    Hi
    I have maintained the Partner functions in Vendor master.
    But when i create a Scheduling agreement, the partner functions are not picked from Vendor master.
    Can any body help on this please?
    Thanks & regards,
    Sasi

    Dear Sir,
    I am also face same problem.
    AIM : I want to display manufacture name in good receipt.
    I done : I have create one charecteristic for manufacture and in this charecteristic i have assign field of manufacture name which is maintain in vendor partner role. Then i have maintain one batch class RM_class and it assign to material.But when i want to display manufacture name in good receipt it is not display.
    Analysis : The field of manufacture name is not saved in any table it is use in structure. so field of manucture is not caintain any value so it can't display any valve in good receipt.
    Solution: If you give name of manufactue in CT04(charecteristic of manufacture) and this charecteristic assign to class(RM_class) then this class is assign to material.Than when you create good receipt and select manufacture name it will display at the time of batch determination and also when you want to dispaly mateiral list by manufacture you can see it with help of BMBC.
    If you have any other idea please explan me.
    Ragards,
    Mahesh Wagh.

  • Header text not printed for scheduling agreement

    Hi All,
    I have issue with header text print out for scheduling agreement (SA).
    In SA when I am manually writing some note and then taking print out, system is giving me correct output with maual note.
    I have one standard text (ST) which I need to be printed in evry SA, so in SPRO I created new head text for vendor and in copying rule for text for SA, I created linkage of SA header text with Vendor head text.
    In vendor master, I inserted ST in newly created vendor header text.
    So now when ever I create new SA for vendor system will determin header text from vendor master.
    Now after creating SA when I check the SA, I am able to my ST in SA, but at the time of print out this ST in not printing.
    Please let me know what could be the reson.
    Regards,
    Sameer

    I dont understand about what you mean by expand.
    When you a print PO, PO text  (header or item) it will check to the configuration setting.
    The system didnt care if its adopted from vendor master or info record, or whatever you make in the copying rule.
    In your case : you create a standard text then it get copied into PO , then you set the standard text to the PO for print out, example the standard text : word is
    "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
    Then in the PO the text appear will be like below(the same, because it get copied)
    "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
    If you configure it in define text for SA, then it the print out it will also (the same)
    "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
    So what text need to expand?

  • TAXES not display into scheduling agreement

    Dear gurus,
    I have maintened info record  & tax conditions for raw material.also create scheduling agreement with price update.But during display/change of shceduling agreement,while click on taxes tab-following message occur--FUNCTION NOT POSSIBLE FOR MATERIAL
    Pl. deliver details,
    Regards,
    Devendra

    I have mainten the tax code in me12,but it wnt get dispaly in me38 while selecting tab taxes,
    Pl. deliver details
    Regards,
    Devendra

  • Auto update of Schedule Agreements

    Once a schedule agreement has been created will MRP auto update the delivery date (for JIT) if the lead time is zero days and the new need date is today?

    You need to check what is the procedure (T-Code) from which the data gets updated into these tables.
    For example
    when we craete a material from MM01 the data gets updated in the corresponding table i.e. EKPO.
    In same way you need to find the process and then you can use BTE (Busineess transaction events) for that process. BTE are only for FI module and these tables are also related to FI .

  • Retention amount paid to vendor is not updated in PO history tab

    Dear All,
    I had activated business function 'LOG_MMFI_P2P'. As a result i am getting Payment processing tab in PO.
    There i can define Down payment and Retention percentages. I had created a service purchase order and then service entry sheet.
    After the acceptance of service entry sheet i did invoicing (MIRO). Here i get an option to clear down payment (an additional button becomes available to clear down payment). That scenario is working perfectly fine. System also proposes the retention amount. I can change retention amount/percentage or continue with same.After invoice is posted the retention amount is visible under PO history tab against Invoice number.
    Now my problem is when i am doing payment of retention amount(after doing payment of services deducting down payment and retention)  to vendor the 'Posted Retention in Document Currency' column in PO history tab is not updated.
    Regards,
    Kamal

    Dear Pankaj,
    Thanks for quick Reply.
    I think you did not understand my question. In PO history tab for down payment scenario (defined through PO and cleared in MIRO) proper lines are getting created. For retention new line will not be created. But the invoice row in PO history tab is having two columns -
    1) Retention in Document Currency.
    2) Posted Retention in Document Currency.
    The first column is having value which is the retention amount. But second column is not having any value even after the payment (portion held as retention)is made.
    I will add one more thing. If i run FK10N for the vendor- then Special G/L account for retention is updated properly.
    Regards,
    Kamal
    Edited by: kamal.anandani1 on Apr 22, 2011 8:02 AM

  • PR not adopted in Scheduling Agreement

    I have created a Scheduling Agreement but when i add the Item from Create with Ref. to Purchase Requisition of that Material its not picking up the PR.
    actually that PR no. is made in PR type ZIMP (our customized PR type)
    but when I made the PR in PR Type PR for MRP then it picks ups the PR.
    is there any settings to be done in IMG settings that certain PR type is linked with Scheduling agreement
    if so where and how i can achieve this.
    abhishek suppal

    Hi,
    Yes you have link with PR in SPRO.
    This is the IMG Path <b>Materials Management --> Purchasing --> Scheduling Agreement --> Define Document Types</b>.
    Here you have <b>Link purchase requisition - document type</b>.
    Hope this will solve your problem.
    --Ragu

Maybe you are looking for