Pricing issue with Product hierarchy - Urgent

Hello,
I have an issue on pricing determination with product hierarchy.
I created product hierarchy as following,
level1 - A0001
level2 - A0001B0001
level3 - A0001B0001C0001
Then, assigned A0001B0001C0001 to material D in material master.
I created condition record with A0001B0001C0001(level 3), the system found the condition sucessfully when I created a sales order with material D.
However, I created condition record with A0001(level1) but the system didn't get the price when I created the sales order with material D. Since A0001B0001C0001 belongs to A0001, the system is supposed to get the price from the condition record with A0001...
Could you please let me know how to fix it?

Hi,
Thanks a lot for your kind explanation.
Here is the access sequence I defined. I wonder if there is anyway I can define PRODH1, PRODH2, PRODH3 in access sequnce the same way with customer hierarchy so that the system can check higher level data. If it's not allowed, I think I should define routine in requirement as you advised. Thanks!
*Accesses
AcNo       Description
1           Customer Hierarchy/Product Hiearchy
2           Customer Hierarchy/Product Hiearchy
3           Customer Hierarchy/Product Hiearchy
4           Customer Hierarchy/Product Hiearchy
Fields
AcNo   Condition    Doc. field      field lable
     1      HIENR      HIEBO01     CustomerHierarchy 01
             PRODH     PRODH       Product hierarchy
     2.     HIENR      HIEBO02     CustomerHierarchy 02
             PRODH     PRODH       Product hierarchy
     3      HIENR      HIEBO03     CustomerHierarchy 03
             PRODH     PRODH       Product hierarchy
     4       HIENR      HIEBO04     CustomerHierarchy 04
             PRODH     PRODH       Product hierarchy
I wonder if I can assign product hierachy fields, PRODH1, PRODH2, PRODH3 to access sequence like customer hierarchy so that the system can check higher level data to get the price...

Similar Messages

Inter Company billing issues with product heirarchy

Hi,
Wish you a Happy New year,,,,,,,
We have done all the necessary configuration for generating Inter Company billing including the Cost booking to vendor Automatically.
There are certain points where I need some help,
1) During Idoc genration we are getting error related to Payment terms of Internal Customer.
If the payment terms is immidiate then only an Idoc is getting generated,,,,,,,,, else it is throwing an error message " status 51", but according to our business requirements it may be for any days and this may also impact our aging analysis and cash flows.
2) We have configured upto Third level of product hierarchy but while creating a contract if user maintains only upto first level, then release to account is not happening for inter company billing. Where as if user maintain upto third level there is no issue in the whole process of inter comapny billing.
Kindly suggest us how to restrict user to maintain product hierarchy pto third level during the creation of contract.
3) during the Inter company billing generation, if the internal customer is eligible for Tax exemption or tax booking, that is how to book the tax details to internal customer and also to vendor while booking the cost.Please let us know the logic for tax processign in Inter company billing and Idoc generation.
Awaiting for a favourable reply and thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Upendra.

Double click the status 51 to find the error message. 51 just tells that the Idoc has an error, but which error can only be seen if you go a step more into detail.
For what reason do you have level 1 product hierarchies in the system, if you need the full hierarchy to level 3?
I give you example:
Level 1 =11111
level 2 = 21111, and 22222 and 23333
level 3 = 31111 and 32222 and 33333
Hierarchy should only be maintained available in customizing only in its full length:
111112222233333
or 111112111131111
but not the level one alone.

ERP Sales Order : Performance issues with Product Proposal

Hi
we are working on CRM 2007 solution and are facing serious performance issues with the ERP Sales Order functionality provided in the ICWC of this version.
In our development we are adding items in the ERP cart as soon as the user clicks on the 'New Sales Order' button of the sales order sreen. We get the items by very simple and optimized call to the ERP system and then add these entities in the Item Cart (Item collection ...in simple sense).
For adding 10 items the application takes 10 seconds and this is too much for adding just 10 items.
Can you please provide any Notes/alternative solution to resolve this issue.
Regards
Ajitabh

Hi Ajithabh,
Please apply the following SAP notes:
1061423 - Interaction Center ERP Order Performance improvement
1262277 - Performance: CRM value help causes dumps in ERP
1292817 - Performance: Reduce RFC calls during creation of ERP order.
1319885 - ERP sales order search with external reference
1326527 - Reducing number of RFC calls in IC ERP Sales Order
I hope it helps!
Regards,
Gabriel Santana

Issue with production order linked to quote instead of sales order

Hi Gurus,
I did a lot of digging through SAP notes and accross the internet. Before I contact SAP, just wanted to give a shot @ SDN. Please help.
Background- for ATO (VC assemble to Order):
i) Created a quote
ii) Created a sales order with reference to a quote
iii) MRP created a planned order and the planned order is linked to the quote
iV) Production order created and it is also linked to a quote
v) All reports, MD04/COOIS shows that the plnd order/prd order is linked to the quote
My issue - print a shop paper or a customer specific product ID label....guess what 'it prints the quote number everywhere'.
Everything is tied to a quote - which is not a real demand. All purchase orders are tied to the quote. THIS IS STUPID.
I refered to SAP Notes - 181685 and 459734. But I need details of what config settings I should do and where?
I'm a pure PP guy, getting into SD requirement type & account assignement settings. Please help me with details.
http://scn.sap.com/message/8018953#8018953
This guy also had the same problem and his issue was never resolved.
Thanks,

Hello
Take a look on the following note where this scenario is described:
16658 - Generate sales order stock based on quotation
The note proposes the following setting as a workaround to this issue:
"As of 3.0, when the requirements type is assigned to the transaction
during requirements type determination, it is possible to assign a
requirements type to the quotation that does not represent make-to-order
production."
Therefore, please check your customizing settings and make sure that a requirement class/type (transactions OVZG and OVZI) without MTO is assigned to the quotation item category (transaction OVZI).
On transaction OVZI, there is a field called "Origin of requirement type in requirement type determination". Please take a look on the information provided on the F1 help of this field:
========================================================================
Origin of requirement type in requirement type determination
In the standard release, the requirements type is determined according
to a certain search strategy depending on the strategy group of the
material.
In this field you can select an alternative search strategy (source):
Source 0 = Material master strategy, then item category and MRP type
Source 1 = Item type and MRP type strategy
Source 2 = Item type and MRP type strategy (as for source 1) with
additional check of the allowed requirements type
========================================================================
Therefore, my suggestion is to set this field to 1 for the quotation item category and assign an MTS requirement type on OVZI.
BR
Caetano

Issue with Product Allocation Scenario

I am Trying out Product Allocation in APO (SCM 5.0).
Relevant setup in SPRO - Product Allocation Object, Group, Procedure, Sequence etc., Planning Object Structure, Planning Area, CVC generation, Connection between Planning Area and Product Allocation object in GATP, assignment in Location Product Master (at Customer Location) Product Allocation Procedure, Check mode, ATP Group has been done in APO.
After entering data in appropriate keyfigures (Allocated Qty) it shows up under GATP>> Reporting >> Product Allocations >> Time Series per CVC
Have carried out ATP Simulation to check that for a given product at Customer the Product Allocation against a Required Quantity takes place correctly.
Now trying to carry out the Product Allocation check by creating a Sales Order in ECC. In that case during the material availability check screen in APO, the product allocation does not show up.
I believe it is related to master data settings for the product in ECC. My questions are as follows:
1. In ECC the product exists at the manufacturing plant only (and not at customer as in APO). There in MRP3 tab Strategy Group is maintained. Is this along with Availability Check field responsible for determining the check instruction (combination of check mode + business event) in APO for the Product Allocation check.
2. If so (which I guess it is) I can see the check instruction picked up in APO while creation of sales order in ECC is different from the check instruction I ran simulation with. How can I ensure the same check instruction is chosen (in which case I believe the availability check result will be same as the ATP Simulation carried out in APO).
3. In APO I ran simulation for the product at customer location (and maintained the required ATP settings in the product master). In case of Sales Order creation in ECC how does system pick up the Check Mode and Business Event for the product (having Sold-to as customer and Supply Plant as the plant code) and use it in APO.
4. Any other setting/configuration that is missed causing this behaviour.
I guess some of the questions is a bit hazy but I would appreciate if someone can outline the Product Allocation Scenario. I am trying out based on Building Block S59 Demand Planning for Product Allocation but of course it does not detail out enough.
Disclaimer: My knowledge of GATP is almost nil but am exploring.
Thanks,
Somnath

Hi Somnath,
It will be a pleasure to help you out.
Firstly I will list out all the steps which I can think of:
(1) R3-You have moved all the ATP customizing from R3 to APO via ATP integration model.
(2) APO- goto SPRO>APO>GATP>General Settings>Maintain Check Instructions
Here go to Check Mode- 041 and Business Event- A and maintain the following settings manually in development and migrate it all the way to Production
I am assuming here that you want to first do an allocation check and then availability check**
Product Allocation: Change from NO CHECK to First Check
Product Check: Change from First Check to Second Check
This check mode and business event is the most common one which is triggered while placing a sales order
See the following blog for DETERMINATION OF CHECK MODE
http://solution-timezone-issue.blogspot.com/
There might be other check modes( 030, 050) which might also require this change. However you can judge that while placing a sales order and when you go to the availability screen, You have the tab - SCOPE OF CHECK CONTROL where you can see the Check Mode + Business Event
Following guidelines can be used to modify Check Instrctions after Customizing Import from R/3
1. Business Event A* is Sales Order Entry (The main scope of GATP) so define check instructions for all check modes since it is not possible to identify the requirement class that may come over on an order. For Business Event A* if availability check was being done in R3, then define check instructions with Allocation as first step, then Availability check as second step. Else if no availablity check in R3 then define check instructions with no availability and no allocation checks.
2. Business Event B* is normally for deliveries but is also required for Rush Sales Orders. An R/3 configuration showed that 041 is the only requirement class that will come across for this business event. Hence defined only for 041 check mode. For Business Event B* if availability check was being done in R3, then define check instructions with Allocation as first step, then Availability check as second step. Else if no availablity check in R3 then define check instructions with no availability and no allocation checks.
3. Business Event 03 required for Inventory Transaction availability check such as MB1C. For such transactions, the APO Product Master Check Mode is used. Hence check instructions for all Check Modes are maintained. For Business Event 03 if availability check was being done in R3, then define check instructions with Availability check as first step. Else if no availablity check in R3 then define check instructions with no availability checks.
(3) Maintain the Product Alllocation Procedure:
a- Create a Product Alloc Object -- Example: PAO-001
In this step, we define the product allocations objects - product allocations are saved per object for a characteristics combination in the product allocation group.
Product Allocation Procedures can be used to maintain different Product Allocation Objects for different time validity periods.
Generally Product Allocation Objects are used to model the different reasons for the need for allocation material shortage, capacity constraint, etc.
b- Product Alloc Group--PAO-1234
A product allocation group defines a group of characteristics against which allocation checking is done.
 Creating a Product Allocation Group creates a characteristics directory in the APO database and an area in Live Cache where the key figures are maintained.
 If Check Planning Area is set to No then allocation and incoming order quantitiy data can be seen in table /SAPAPO/QTTAB. If the Check Planning Area is set to Yes then no data is stored in this table and the allocation check is done directly against the data in the Planning area.
 Detials of allocationconsumption by sales orders are maintained in table /SAPAPO/QTVB in APO and in QTVB in R/3.
If Check Planning Area is set to Yes and if there are users are in the change mode in the Planning Book, Sales Order Entry can get locked out.
If Check Planning Area is initially set to yes and then deactivated later you will no longer see data in /SAPAPO/AC42.
Settings:
Check Planning Area Yes. The reason being that users are not expected to lock planning books as they would be defaulted into the display mode (through a development object). Also most allocation uploads will be through batch jobs. Setting it to Yes reduces one step of moving data between the planning area and the allocation group.
Check Date - Material Availability Date. Consumption of allocation quantity and checking of available allocation quantities is determined by the check date.
Time Bucket Profile Week
Characteristics Product Allocation Object (1), Product (2), Plant(3), Customer(4)
Consumption Period Bwd Consumption 1
Meaning that first the order will consume from current week allocation and then go 1 week backward to consume.
c- Product Allocation Procedure --- PAO-4567
Step Sequence:
Step -
Step Name- -
Prod Alloc Group -
Wild card
1 First Step PAO-1234 9
Alloc Procudure - PAO-4567
Prod Alloc Step -1
Control
Valid from -
Valid to---- -
Object -
Active -
Factor
 12/31/2037 PAO-001 Check the Box 1
d- Maintain Connection to Planning Area (APO)
In this step, we maintain the assignment of the planning area to the product allocation group. We must make this assignment because characteristics of the product allocation group have different names from the info objects of the planning area.
All characteristics of a product allocation group must be assigned to an info object. But multiple info objects can be assigned to one info object. It is not always necessary to assign every info object to a characteristic. It is possible for aggregation and disaggregation (depending on the direction of transfer) to take place with info objects that are not assigned.
Product Alloc Group -
Planning Area -
Version -
Time Buckets
PAO-1234 xxxxx 000 W
Characteristic
KONOB - Prod Alloc Obj
MATNR --- Material
WERK -
Plant
XXXXX---- Customer
Key Figures
Order Qty - AMENGE
Alloc Qty - KCQTY
e- Check the Product Alloc Settings
This is only a check- Everything should be green and OK .
(4) You have planned the Characteristic Combination on which you want to do ALLOCATION.
Create a new POS- Which has your chracateristics as PRODUCT, PLANT,CUSTOMER, Product Alloc Object ( 9AKONOB)
Planning Area,- Key figures required are Alloc Qty, Order Qty( Sales Order Qty)
PLannig Book, Data View which has the following characteristics- Product, PLant
Assuming you are allocating at the following CVC level- Product, PLant,Customer
Step 1:
/n/sapapo/MC62-Create Time Series- Basicallly your CVCs -
Example: Product 1234, Plant INDIA, CUstomer WALKART
Step 2:
Move Characteristic Values Combination to Allocation Group (APO)
/SAPAPO/ATPQ_PAREA_K
INput :
Planning Area: xxxx
Prod Alloc Group: PAO-1234
(5) In the INtegration MOdel - Activate the ATP CHECK Integration model for the Plant and material
THis is the KEY which decides whether availability should be done in R3 or APO
Material Active in the integration model -- Means Availability( GLOBAL AVAILABILITY: Prod Alloc+Prod Availability) is done in APO
Material not active in the integration model --- Means Availability Check is done in R3
(6) APO MASTER DATA SETTINGS:
Material Master: On the ATP Tab, Assign Loc Dep Procedure ( Prod Alloc Procedure)
Location Master: Calendar Tab> Create a shipping time stream calendar
Additional Info: Please contact your R3-SD people as this involves a lot of understanding and I have not listed all the details here.
This config shown here is a very basic one which not even 25% of the companies might be using.
If you have any questions on this part- please see my business card and email me**
(7) SCHEDULING: This is a major task which determines the route and transit times for calculating the
Material Availability date
Goods Issue Date
Delivery Date
on the sales order line item- schedule line
I dont know whether you need info on this**There are many ways of doing this
a- Configurable Scheduling
b- COndition records
c- User Exit
You can find documentation in SPRO or else let me know*
For simplicity- Let me take the easiest to create and difficult to maintain master data- Condition Records
Step1 --Define Field Catalog for Condition Table (APO)
/SAPCND/AU01
Require Plant and Route defined here in the field catalog
Step 2- Define Condition Table for Scheduling (APO)
/SAPCND/AU03
Create a new table- 901
901 - Pick Time based on Route with key as Route
902- Route Time based on route
Step 3- Maintain Access for Scheduling (APO)
/SAPCND/AU07
Take the important ones- PICK and TRAN
I am assuming again as I dont know what kind of Scheduling is maintained on R3 Side. Mostly 80% companies have only two lead times- Pick and Route Transit time.**
PICK- Select pick and click on accesses > Acno-10-- Table-901
 >> Then save it > and go in again
Select PICK and click on Fields> A popup will appear > Enter the access sequence as PICK--- Enter the access as 10 and click on the GREEn ARROW and save it
TRAN- Select TRAN and click on accesses > Acno-10-- Table-902
 >> Then save it > and go in again
Select TRAN and click on Fields> A popup will appear > Enter the access sequence as TRAN--- Enter the access as 10 and click on the GREEn ARROW and save it
Now coming to maintaining the Condition records in APO EASY ACCESS
/SAPCND/AU11
Create SCheduling Step for PICK : Enter condition type- PICK
Enter Route- USCAN --- Duration -24:00 (Hrs)
Create SCheduling Step for TRAN: Enter condition type- TRAN
Enter Route- USCAN --- Duration -48:00 (Hrs)
Now Let me answer your questions:
(1) Question 1- In ECC the product exists at the manufacturing plant only (and not at customer as in APO).
I did not undertsand what you mean here. As we can create a Material at the following locations in APO( Dist Center(DC), Manu Plant(PL), Cusomter, Vendor, etc)
For GATP all we need is the material at a PLant location
STrategy Group on MRP3 tab: This is purely used for determining the CHECK MODE value on APO Product Master.
When this is blank on R3, the check mode will be blank on APO.
However SAP recommends Putting in a strategy group value on R3 Material Master
or
a default Check MOde value for all those Products who have blank check mode- 041 is the best value * This piece SAP hasnt recommended but I found that there is No harm in anyway and it is MANDATORYfor inventory transactions like GOODS ISSUE otherwise you will get a QUEUE in SYSFAIL **
Even if this is blank this has no effect on the GLOBAL ATP as the Check mode for a SD transaction is determined as follows
98% of the SD transactions will generate a CHeck mode of 041 and Business Event- A ***
Through the item category and the MRP type in the MRP view
The item category is derived from the item category group in the Sales view of the material master record and from the order type of the sales document. Together with the MRP type in the MRP view of the material master record, the item category determines what requirements type is selected. The advantage of this method is that the selection of the requirements type depends on the business process (such as quotation, sales order, or repair).
(2) Question 2 - I guess now you must have understood why when you do a simulation in APO, it is taking the Check mode from APO product Master
and when you do a ATP Check from R3, the check mode(041) is different
You dont need to ensure that they are the same- It doesnt matter in anyway.
(3) Question 3- In APO I ran simulation for the product at customer location (and maintained the required ATP settings in the product master).I
When you run ATP simulation- AC04, you generally run it for the plant as that is the supplying location and not the customer.
In case of Sales Order creation in ECC how does system pick up the Check Mode and Business Event for the product (having Sold-to as customer and Supply Plant as the plant code) and use it in APO.
PLease look above for this answer.
(4) Question 4 - Any other setting/configuration that is missed causing this behaviour.
To my best knowledge, whatever I could remember I have listed out. However there are some more steps which might be needed.
Follow all the steps as I have mentioned and whenever you get struck somewhere, shoot me a message and I will help you.
ONe more pointer here to what you have mentioned
Relevant setup in SPRO - Product Allocation Object, Group, Procedure, Sequence etc., Planning Object Structure, Planning Area, CVC generation, Connection between Planning Area and Product Allocation object in GATP, assignment in Location Product Master (at Customer Location) Product Allocation Procedure, Check mode, ATP Group has been done in APO.
After entering data in appropriate keyfigures (Allocated Qty) it shows up under GATP>> Reporting >> Product Allocations >> Time Series per CVC
Have carried out ATP Simulation to check that for a given product at Customer the Product Allocation against a Required Quantity takes place correctly.
Somnath, I believe you might have a wrong picture here. The concept of allocation is Controlling Supply against huge Demand which is in this case coming from SALES ORDER
When you place a sales order, the supplying location is your plant and that is where you would like to put in allocation quantities
Say for example for a material 12345 - You have stock of 100 Qty in Plant KING fo this week and it shows as follows in the planning book
Customers say are WALKART, GE-FUG, MACROGUN
The CVCs which we have to create are as follows
Similar to Demand PLanning**
Material 12345 -PLant KING-Cust WALKART-Prod Alloc Obj
Material 12345 -PLant KING-Cust GE-FUG-Prod Alloc Obj
Material 12345 -PLant KING-Cust MACROGUN-Prod Alloc Obj
And this is how it appears in the planing book when you go into DETAILS ALL
You basically enter the Allocation Quantities just as how you enter forecast quantities in DP Book*
 Wk1 | WK2 WK3 WK4 WK5
Alloc Qty |
Material 12345 |
Plant KING |
Cust WALKART 50 |
Cust GE-FUG 30 |
Cust MACROGUN 20 |
Incoming Order Qty |
Material 12345 |
Plant KING |
Cust WALKART 50|
Cust GE-FUG 25 |
Cust MACROGUN 20 |
50 : Say the Cust WALKART has ordered 250 for this week, however only the allocated quantity -50 will be confirmed for him and the remaining 200 qty will be confirme at a later week when he is given the allocated amount.
25 :Similarily say this customer GE-FUG has ordered 20 qty. So his remaining allocation is basically 5 which cannot be used by any other customer.
20 : Say this customer MACROGUN has ordered exactly the allocated amount of 20. So his remaining allocation will be 0.
This is the basic idea of how Allocation Concept is used in GATP.
Ofcourse you can add the other functionalities like
Rules Based ATP(LOcation Substitution, Product Substitution)
Multi ATP( BOM-COmponents)
Check Aginst Forecast
Etc Etc
Like any other module of SAP- this module has much to offer which unfortunately I cannot list here**
GOOD LUCK and let me know If you need additional help.
Regards
KUMAR AYYAGARI
Message was edited by:
 Kumar P Ayyagari

I-Procurement problems with approval hierarchy - Urgent!! Please help!

Dear experts,
I am having a number of problems in i-procurement (12.1.3). When creating a Requisitions in i-procurement on the screen when it arrives with the approval list, it has retrieved a personel who is not in the hierarchy list at all. (not using AME just employee hierarchy)
I have checked the usual setting such as making sure the document type settings is correct and the position hierarchy for the position raising the requisition.
In addition to this once proceeding with submitting the requisition the created time is completly wrong. It is displaying a date occuring in the past. And in the Justification field it has already been populated it appears that it has captured information from a previous requisition. Furthermore in the created by field it also displaying a name of a different user to the one I am currently using.
I am out of ideas as to exactly what the problems is. Would appreciate if any I-procurement gurus can take a look at my issue.
Thanks and Regards
Ebsnoob

That sounds like a feedback loop.
Does the tone alter in pitch when you alter input and/or output levels or move your microphone?
And have you checked your coreaudio device in *Logic Pro>Preferences>Audio* ? And your recording settings in *File>Project Settings* ?
And how is your monitoring setup? Directly from the Presonus, or do you use *Software Monitoring* ?
Does the tone stop when you hit Pause ?
2nd possibility: a note event somewhere triggers a synth - but that would also happen in playback, so it is a long shot.... it does not happen in playback?
regards, Querik.
ps: the advantage of smashing up things is that then you are at least sure you can't fix it anymore. Better keep some broken stuff handy, because you'll regret smashing up working stuff.

Issue with product tops not moving after Upgrade Filesystem installed

All:
I have just installed the R12 tech stack and db in preparation for the upgrade. After this is completed it (rapidwiz) creates an environment file in $APPL_TOP. My issue is that some of the products, based on this environment file, still point to the 11i structure. There are about 10 products which have this issue. What should be done. Any suggestions are appreciated. I have pasted some of the ones that are still pointing to the old structure:
AMF_TOP=/mnt/rd4/oracle/devappl/amf/11.5.0
GRAPHICS60_PATH=/mnt/rd4/oracle/devappl/au/11.5.0/graphs
CSS_TOP=/mnt/rd4/oracle/devappl/css/11.5.0
JTS_TOP=/mnt/rd4/oracle/devappl/jts/11.5.0
Here are some that are pointing to the correct location:
INV_TOP=/mnt/rd4/app/dev/apps/apps_st/appl/inv/12.0.0
IEC_TOP=/mnt/rd4/app/dev/apps/apps_st/appl/iec/12.0.0
AMS_TOP=/mnt/rd4/app/dev/apps/apps_st/appl/ams/12.0.0

kirkladb wrote:
All:
I have just installed the R12 tech stack and db in preparation for the upgrade. After this is completed it (rapidwiz) creates an environment file in $APPL_TOP. My issue is that some of the products, based on this environment file, still point to the 11i structure. There are about 10 products which have this issue. What should be done. Any suggestions are appreciated. I have pasted some of the ones that are still pointing to the old structure:
AMF_TOP=/mnt/rd4/oracle/devappl/amf/11.5.0
GRAPHICS60_PATH=/mnt/rd4/oracle/devappl/au/11.5.0/graphs
CSS_TOP=/mnt/rd4/oracle/devappl/css/11.5.0
JTS_TOP=/mnt/rd4/oracle/devappl/jts/11.5.0
Here are some that are pointing to the correct location:
INV_TOP=/mnt/rd4/app/dev/apps/apps_st/appl/inv/12.0.0
IEC_TOP=/mnt/rd4/app/dev/apps/apps_st/appl/iec/12.0.0
AMS_TOP=/mnt/rd4/app/dev/apps/apps_st/appl/ams/12.0.0Make sure that all these TOPs are set properly in the R12 appliction context file and in all env files under $APPL_TOP directory.
Also, make sure that the 11i env file is not sourced in the applmgr user's profile (i.e. .bash_profile).
Thanks,
Hussein

Issues in Production time : Urgent

Hi Folks Can anybody help me in figuring out these issues on real time scenario...
1) How to handle if the one system is down for long time when other subsequent systems are up and getting the data. ( The scenario is that we are sending data to 3 different Receiver and one Source ) we cannot stop the source and cannot resend the data to the down system because we will loose the sequential order..
2) Message Missing though it is Successful in Sxmb_Moni and in Adapter Communication Channel
500 Internal server error we have to find Manually and apply the SAP notes. Increase the Queue, Fine Tuning the Performance, increasing the Session of the Particular Adapter
3) If it is Huge Load, the Message content tab does not appears ..If that is the case how to handle the situation
4) 100000 + records how to handle it. SAP XI takes 4 hours to deliver to third party system has to send the data in 30 minutes...with help
5) How to make a counter value for group of messages handled by particular Interface. for example though the messages are chunked to several blocks we need continuity for the counter
6) Trace for JDBC adapter
7) To debug in Visual Admin

1) How to handle if the one system is down for long time when other subsequent systems are up and getting the data. ( The scenario is that we are sending data to 3 different Receiver and one Source ) we cannot stop the source and cannot resend the data to the down system because we will loose the sequential order..
for the system down XI makes the 3 attempts to resend the data to that system and the frequecy for eachtime is maintained in the paramter in SXMB_ADM...you can increase the parameter value so that XI tries to resend that many times before throwing the errror in SXMB_MONI...if still system is not up then once it is up you have to restart the messages in order....
2) Message Missing though it is Successful in Sxmb_Moni and in Adapter Communication Channel
Message missing ( if it sucesfull in SXMB_MONI and CC then you should recive the messgae in the target of the CC, it cannot say sucessfull and then dnt deliver...
500 Internal server error we have to find Manually and apply the SAP notes. Increase the Queue, Fine Tuning the Performance, increasing the Session of the Particular Adapter
this delends on the interface flow( data) depneidng up on how system is performing you might end up doing the fine tuning......
3) If it is Huge Load, the Message content tab does not appears ..If that is the case how to handle the situation:
there is no alternative to this,,,if the payload is huge the MM tab takes some time to show the data only thing you can finetune to XI server ( check blogs on this)
4) 100000 + records how to handle it. SAP XI takes 4 hours to deliver to third party system has to send the data in 30 minutes...with help
100000 + records this is a huge number,,,,but should not take 4 hrs to process..if it is there is something wrong with the system...you have to do the finetuning and find out y it is taking more time.....
ideally you can break this 100000 record into 10 files each containing 10000 records and process,,,,,use any file splitting program and call it in OS command in file adatper
5) How to make a counter value for group of messages handled by particular Interface. for example though the messages are chunked to several blocks we need continuity for the counter.
Need more info
6) Trace for JDBC adapter : adapter monitoring details are not sufficent?

Issue with Script its urgent

Hi,
Any one please let me know how we can defne new-page with particular page name.
for example i want to display the newpage
All terms & conditions in last page its layout is different.
if iam using CONTROL_FORM function module its not taking LAstpage as new page
please let me know urgently.
thanks & regards...
Anil.T

Hi
The first thing you have to consider is the NEW-PAGE statament can be done in the MAIN only.
In the SAPSCRIPT you can insert the line:
/: NEW-PAGE <PAGE NAME>
so try to transfer the same command to fm CONTROL_FORM
Max

Pricing issue-With reference to group condition

Hi Friends,
Below are the details of the issue i have,
Letu2019s say we have 3 service line items in a service order
Line item 1-Do not charge the customer (controlled through accounting indicator)
Line item 2-Charge customer (controlled through accounting indicator)
Line item 3-Charge customer (controlled through accounting indicator)
Now we have maintained group condition in pricing. So if line item 1 has 20 min, 2-30 min and 3-40 min of service the pricing will be as under,
System adds 203040=90 min in total and than search for the scales accordingly (due to the group condition check) as the condition type is also scale based. But we donu2019t want to charge for the line item 1 due to some business rule. Thus the system should not consider line item 1(20 min) and add only 30+40=70 and look for the scales accordingly. Once the right scale has been found, it should divide the same in line item 2 and 3 equally. eg- if the scale returned was 60, it should be divided as 30 each between line item 2 and 3 and not as 20 between all 3 line items. We tried to make the scale of line item 1 to zero on certain business rule by creating a new routine. The problem now is, after getting the right scale the system divides it between the 3 line items instead of 2. Let us know if you have any solution to resolve this issue.
Highly appreciate your help
Sameer

Hi Sameer,
not sure which type of routine you did try to use. You should check whether a group key routine could help you to control the items, which should be grouped. Another option could be to prevent automatic determination of the group condition on the first item by a specific requirement formula (e.g. this could check the item categroy or the account indicator).
Best Regards,
Michael

SMALL ISSUE WITH ALV HIERARCHY

Hi
Hi ,
I have small doubt in alv hierachail report ,
can anyone tell me how the header and the item level data match
i have iheader and iitem internal tables.
say i have matnr in iheader ,do i need to have the matnr field in iitem also
so if expand the iheader then i needed to get the material desc for that material.
DATA: s_keyinfo TYPE slis_keyinfo_alv.
s_LAYOUT-EXPAND_FIELDNAME = 'EXPAND'.
iKNOW THAT I HAVE TWO PASS SOMETHING TO S_KEYINFO TO RELATE .CAN ANYONE TELL ME HOW TO DO THIS.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_HIERSEQ_LIST_DISPLAY'
 EXPORTING
 i_callback_program = v_repid
 is_layout = s_layout
 it_fieldcat = t_fieldcatalog
 i_tabname_header = 'IHEADER'
 i_tabname_item = 'IITEM'
 is_keyinfo = s_keyinfo
 TABLES
 t_outtab_header = iHEADER
 t_outtab_item = iItEM
 EXCEPTIONS
 program_error = 1
 OTHERS = 2.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
Thanks

Hi Swathi,
Check out std programs:
BCALV_TEST_HIERSEQ_LIST
BCALV_TEST_HIERSEQ_LIST_EVENTS
BALVHD01
BALVHD01_GROUP
BALVHM10
BALVHM12
hope this helps.
Manish
Message was edited by:
 Manish Kumar

Issue with Presentation Hierarchy in obiee 11g

Hi Guru's
I am using a presentation hierarchy in obiee 11 g, but it is behaving weirdly when expanding the hierarchy
for example i have a hierarchy for languages when i expand one country in the hierarchy all the countries which has similar childs are getting expanded
for Example Parent A B C D
under A i have 1, 2,3,4, under B i have 5,6,7,8 under C i have 9, 10 ,11, 12 under D i have 1, 13, 14, 15
so when i expand A in answers D is also getting expanded as i have 1 as common value in both the parents.
can some please help me how to fix this, as the user does not like this expansion
Thanks in advance,

That is strange... I downloaded the files from the left hand side of this page:
[Sample Application site|http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-foundation/obiee-samples-167534.html]
... the title states quiite clearly that the Sample Application (Build 825) applies to OBIEE release 11g.
Best regards
Juan Algaba Colera

My dynamic form - issue with saving data (urgent-i would greatly appreciate any help)

Hello,
I have some problems with this dynamic form (created in livecycle) http://www.pathology.ubc.ca/Academic_Activity_Data_Form_Jan_4_2013.pdf . It doesn't save data unless I add a' new row' to any of these tables.   There are a few text fileds and if I type anything in there data won't be saved unless I trigger it by adding randomly a table row. This is big problem as this form will be used for updates and if I want to change any of my entered records I will always have to remember to 'add a new row' otherwise just adding/changing text won't be saved. This might sound confusing but you will understanding what is going on if you type in your name and save the form and then type in your name, add a table row and save the form (first case won't be saved second will).
I would greatly appreciate any help.
Debbie

Hi Marco Russo ,
= CALCULATE (
    SUM ( [measure] ),
    PARALLELPERIOD (
        SAMEPERIODLASTYEAR ( DateTime[DateKey] ),
        0,
        QUARTER
I have used the above DAX function it is working fine and i have applied same for Year , Quarter and Month
But when i remove month filters (Slicer) and Year filters in Power view report
it is showing total Year values for Year and Quarter values
for Quarter etc..
Like below i am getting
Last Yr Month Amt Current Yr Month Amt Last Yr Qtr Amt Current Yr Qtr Amt Last Yr Current Yr
10000 30000 10000 30000
30000 30000
but i need Blanks in report if i am not selecting any filters
thanks,
Sreeni

Issue with the Structure urgent please.

Hi guys,
Hope every one doing great...
I am creating a report in that v r having month/year char on this v have created a variable of type user entry.
I had created the structure with many selection for the current year along with this my requirement is to restrict the data in the structure for the prior year as one of the selection.
suppose the user enter the value in the variable = 05.2008
then i need to restrict the data for the prior year= 05.2007.
thanks in advance
KK

Hello KK,
               Create a customer exit variable on 0calmonth characteristic , it must be with single option.
here just for example i have given your new variable as test1 and the user entry variable as var1.
then check the following code if it works.
data: year1(4) type n,
      mon1(2) type n,
      mon2(6) type n.
when 'test1'.
    if i_step = 2. "after the popup
      loop at i_t_var_range into loc_var_range
      where vnam = 'var1'.
       clear l_s_range.
        year1 = loc_var_range-low(4).
        mon1 = loc_var_range-low+4(2).
        year1 = year1 - 1.
        concatenate year1 mon1 into mon2.
        endif.
        l_s_range-low = mon2.
        l_s_range-sign = 'I'.
        l_s_range-opt = 'EQ'.
        append l_s_range to e_t_range.
        exit.
      endloop.
    endif.
hope it helps,
regards,
karthik.

SD -Pricing issue with rounding

Hi All,
We have a price condition in sales order, in which the base codition is USD4 and conditon base value is in USD. System is not giving proper values after rounding. Please see the below example.
Base proce = 2.845 USD4 per PC
Qty = 1
Condition base value = 2.845 * 1 = 2.85 USD
Base proce = 2.345 USD4 per PC
Qty = 1
Condition base value = 2.345 * 1 = 2.34 USD
Base proce = 2.245 USD4 per PC
Qty = 1
Condition base value = 2.845 * 1 = 2.25 USD
If you observe in second case it is not rounded properly. I couldn't understand why it is calculating like this. The value is returning from standard converting currency function module.
Please advice me.
Thanks,
Kiran.

Check in IMG > Logistics General whether for your Company Code, check box for rounding duty is ticked. If so and still you have issue, have a look at the following notes:-
Note 117891 - Rounding off not happening
Note 1005838 - Rounding of duties when get excise invoice is used in J1IIN
G. Lakshmipathi

Pricing issue with Product hierarchy - Urgent

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for