Problem with cproject workflow

hi all,
i have created one workflow which will be treaged when i will release any task from the browser. when i will release this task my project should be released. (this is only for testing ) my workflow is working fine but it is releasing after 3-4 hrs. can anybody tell me that why it is taking so much time? it might be problem with some basis/system settings.so plz basis ppl also look at it and try to help me.
its urgent so plz reply as soon as possible.
Thank you very much in advance.
Regards,
Hetal

wow!, thats sounds really strange.
I propose you set up an example and open an OSS call.
The cpro guys from SAP should have a lok at this and provide a fix.
But if you release a task, the workflow is started as soon as you save or do you reenter the project directly?
There exists a kind of event handler BADI_EVENT, where you can control field changes.
In your case to release the task and need the release of the upper project. I don't like this process, but why not.
One possibility is making a small modification. As soon as task is released, we release all subtasks too. So it can make sense to release the project too.
I guess 3 lines of coding are required, but where
Please try the BADI DPR_EVENT oder the DPR_ATTRIBUTES and in the SET DATA routine, try to set the project release information.
regards
Björn

Similar Messages

Problems with Automatic Workflow Customizing

Hi!
I am having problems with Automatic Workflow Customizing (SWU3). I am trying to execute "Configure RFC Destination" manually. I receive the message "Synchronization of passwords failed".
We are using CUA and it is therefor not possible to create the user from SWU3 which means that WF-BATCH has been created in CUA with a pw which is then filled in by me when executing "Configure RFC Destination".
WF-BATCH has authorization SAP_NEW, SAP_ALL
My user also has SAP_NEW and SAP_ALL and usergroup SUPER.
Does anyone know what might be the problem?
Sincerley
Anders Öhrling

Hello Anders,
Check if the user is locked in SU01. Then check if your user has been created in CUA.
It is recommended to delete WF_BATCH. The system will auto create the user ID WF-BATCH and synchronize the password.
Do let me know if your problem is resolved.
Thank you.
Regards,
Manomeet
- Award points if helpful -

Problem with oracle workflow builder 2.6.3.5

Hello
I have installed oracle workflow server 2.6.3 on a oracle 10G 10.2.0.1 in Red Hat linux Enterprise 4L and I have Oracle workflow builder 2.6.3.5 on Microsoft Windows XP Service pack 2
I have the following error when i try to save or open and itemtype from the database
1005: Language is not populated, please refers to Workflow documentation for steps on populating a language.
How can i solve this i've alredy changed the NLS_LANG to match with the server
In the server the language is set to American and in the NLS_LANG i have set like this AMERICAN_AMERICA.US7ASCII
hope you can help me as soon as posible
Andres

Hi Matt thanks for the answer
i've already seen the wf_languages table and i have the following:
CODE NLS_CODESET I
AR AR8ISO8859P6 N
BG CL8ISO8859P5 N
CA WE8ISO8859P1 N
CS EE8ISO8859P2 N
D WE8ISO8859P1 N
DK WE8ISO8859P1 N
E WE8ISO8859P1 N
EG AR8ISO8859P6 N
EL EL8ISO8859P7 N
ESA WE8ISO8859P1 N
F WE8ISO8859P1 N
CODE NLS_CODESET I
FRC WE8ISO8859P1 N
GB WE8ISO8859P1 N
HR EE8ISO8859P2 N
HU EE8ISO8859P2 N
I WE8ISO8859P1 N
IS WE8ISO8859P1 N
IW IW8ISO8859P8 N
JA JA16EUC N
KO KO16KSC5601 N
LT NEE8ISO8859P4 N
N WE8ISO8859P1 N
CODE NLS_CODESET I
NL WE8ISO8859P1 N
PL EE8ISO8859P2 N
PT WE8ISO8859P1 N
PTB WE8ISO8859P1 N
RO EE8ISO8859P2 N
RU CL8ISO8859P5 N
S WE8ISO8859P1 N
SF WE8ISO8859P1 N
SK EE8ISO8859P2 N
SL EE8ISO8859P2 N
TH TH8TISASCII N
CODE NLS_CODESET I
TR WE8ISO8859P9 N
US US7ASCII Y
ZHS ZHS16CGB231280 N
ZHT ZHT16BIG5 N
37 rows selected.
as you can see i have installed the american_america.us7ascii
also the nls_lang key in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORACLE\KEY_oracleas1
is set to AMERICAN_AMERICA.US7ASCII
I don't know wich is the problem with this
thank you again

Siebel Problem With a Workflow Process (Pleaseee help REAL PROBLEM)

Well the problem is this i have a designed a workflow who is called by a JOB. Its functionality is to close Service Requests at certain time in the night.
when i simulate a workflow against 2 different Servers it works fine without errors, but when i run a job that calls this WP in those servers i have diferent errors in diferent steps.
In one server i have this kind of error in the last step "Cerrar Requerimiento":
SBL-EXL-00151
SBL-SCR-00141
SBL-BPR-00162
This operation is not allowed when there are no records displayed.
Please execute a query that returns at least one record or add a new record
and in the other i have this error in the 3er step:
SBL-SCR-00141- Problem Running a eScript
in spanish:
Error de tiempo de ejecuci?n de Siebel eScript en el procedimiento 'GetFieldValue' de BusComp [Action]:
Error: SiebelError: Esta operaci?n no se permite cuando no hay registros mostrados. Ejecute una consulta que devuelva por lo menos un registro o agregue un nuevo registro.(SBL-DAT-00215)
(SBL-SCR-00141)
Error al invocar servicio 'BCH EAI Query Utility', m?todo 'UpdateRecord' en el paso 'Cerrar Actividades'.(SBL-BPR-00162)
(error in the Runtime of the Siebel eScript in the process GetFieldValue of Action,This operation is not allowed when there are no records displayed.
Please execute a query that returns at least one record or add a new record
error invoking the service "BCH EAI Query Utility in the Method UpdateRecord in the step "Cerrar Actividades".
If they have the same job and workflow, and BS's active(i use the BS in other workflows and no problem with it) why they give error in diferent steps but they work fine when i use the Business Simulator?, its there a solution?, this can be a problem about the server config or triggers??
thanks a lot!

Hi,
1.Is you're server and youre client using the same version of SRF ?
2.Is the version for workflow in server and the one youre testing in client are the same ?
3. Last but not least this BCH EAI Query Utility search spec is it correct ? Can it able to return at least one record base on you're search spec because I know some business service are required to return at least one record else it will throw error.
Thanks,
Joey Tan , Malaysia

Unexpected problem with Delete Workflow

G5 iMac, OS 10.4.3
I have been happily running a workflow called delete.files. It allowed me to do a 35-pass delete of sensitive files (financial data) at the click of a mouse in the contextual menu.
Suddenly, it would no longer work, so I deleted it and moved a copy from my last backup of a week ago.
The backup copy would not work either. Drat!
This .workflow file was in the...
"/Users/Me/Library/Workflows/Applications/Finder"
...folder and thus appeared in the contextual menu. Very convenient, just a mouse click away.
Went back to <http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/automator/deletefilesaction.html> and downloaded it again. Ran the Delete Files Installer and it placed a files.action file in the "/Users/Me/Library/Automator/Delete Files.action" folder.
For the live of me, I forget how to change this .action file into a .workflow file so I can move it to the...
"/Users/Me/Library/Workflows/Applications/Finder" folder
...and have access to it via a right click.
Anyone know how???
Thanks,
bob

I am going to answer my own post because I solved the problem and wan to wind this up with a response in case anyone runs across this same problem.
I did a few searches on my G3 iBook and my G5 iMac (that was having the problem) and discovered this :
G3 had delete.files in ~/Library/Automator folder
G5 did not
Copied the delete.files from the G3 to the G5 and put in in the
~/Library/Automator folder
Logged out/in and now that Workflow works just perfectly. Have no idea how that delete.files file got deleted.
bob

Problem with a workflow.

Hi,
I'm the reinforcement on workflow of one partner that are in vacation and I never work with that. A user have the problem that receive past mails of trainings that not have the current day.
How can I repair that?

Hi,
1.Is you're server and youre client using the same version of SRF ?
2.Is the version for workflow in server and the one youre testing in client are the same ?
3. Last but not least this BCH EAI Query Utility search spec is it correct ? Can it able to return at least one record base on you're search spec because I know some business service are required to return at least one record else it will throw error.
Thanks,
Joey Tan , Malaysia

Document Distribution DMS, problem with standard workflow WS20000104

Hi,
In our document distribution process we stacked with the problem, when we run the document distribution (via tcode CVI8) we got the error of workflow WS20000104. After some search at SCN we found that there is the similar issue, described in the thread: Document distribution workflow in error. Solution which was offered and marked as worked is to enable/activate Result Parameter check box, but in our case this check box is disabled and when we try to edit the BOR in order to activate Result Parameter check box the system asked to input Access Code.
Is there any way (note) to enable this check box without access code?
Thanks.

Hi, Deepak Kori
In transaction SWU3 there is the following situation:
Maintain Runtime Environment is completely green, including sub-categories;
Maintain Definition Environment is red because of Check Entries from HR Control Tables;
Maintain Additional Settings and Services is red because of Maintain Web Server;
Classify Tasks as General is completely green, including sub-categories;
Guided Procedures is red because of Maintain Guided Procedures Gateway.
Could you, please, explain what do you mean under «workflow settings are activated», how parameters described above are related to workflow and may be related to our problem?
If described situation can be assumed as activated, what should we do now? Otherwise, how to make these settings to be activated?
Thanks.

Problem with the Workflow Notification Mailer

Hi Community,
Recently we have just installed the E-Business Suite release 12.0.4 from e-delivery.oracle.com for Linux x86-64 using the VISION Demo database, in order to see and test the release for a future upgrade of our Production environment.
The installation was succesful and we setting up the Workflow Notification Mailer with the data of our SMTP server in order to outbound notifications to that server.
Now, In order to continue testing that instance, we have just executed the scripts to stop de APPS tier and to start the APPS tier, and it seems that the workflow notification mailer can not establish network connection with the e-mail server (Exchange server) after starting the APPS tier.
The Linux server has defined in its hosts file the Exchange e-mail server, and from operating system, we can establish a ping connection.
Any help will be appreciated.
Luis.

Hi,
I had the same issue and I found that Oracle Workflow does not attach files. The solution is to create a table with blob, clob, ordsys, etc data types and reference to the file from a notification and a message.
I did an interface with java to read the document, and then put the link in the oracle workflow message. The link opened the file.
So, for any workflow development is recomended to use your own Entity-Relation Model, including the process number and the files attached to that process.
Regards,
Santiago Meneses
[email protected]
Quito-Ecuador

2 problems with HDV workflow

I just received my PPro CS3 x2 days or so, here are my 3 immeidate problems/questions:
1. I had a couple of seconds able to preview the HDV capture while playing but as soon as I hit record, the preview went away For Good". I was no longer able to preview even when just hit the play button, even with restart CS3.
2. I thought I was told it can now "Scene detect" HDV, but it was disabled.
3. What version of the MainConcept encoder does CS3 uses? Any change from PPro2.0?
Thanks,
Perry

I hate it when things change between a mid-to-late beta build and the final release. Go figure. ;)
Here is the current
LiveDocs
page that I and others have referenced.
The appropriate text is:
You can choose whether to preview DV video on the desktop during preview, during capture, or both. These options for HDV desktop preview, however, are supported on Windows only.
I checked with an unnamed source, and it seems that HDV capture preview isn't going to work on Windows, either. I hope (and expect) that the documentation will be changed in the not-too-distant future.

Problems with stranded workflows

We have workflows that are ending up that are not in anyone's inbox.
If I look at the workflow through SWIA-> Workflow log, the items show up as being In Process. If I look at the last item, it is in a warning state (yellow triangle), with the message "Canceled by user". If I attempt to execute, forward, or re-activate the workflow, it says it "Status change from COMPLETED to READY is not allowed/possible"
Any ideas as to what would be causing this?

S0004089282 wrote:>
> We have workflows that are ending up that are not in anyone's inbox.
>
> If I look at the workflow through SWIA-> Workflow log, the items show up as being In Process. If I look at the last item, it is in a warning state (yellow triangle), with the message "Canceled by user". If I attempt to execute, forward, or re-activate the workflow, it says it "Status change from COMPLETED to READY is not allowed/possible"
>
> Any ideas as to what would be causing this?
First of all, synch the buffers using SWU_OBUF.
you need to check the agent assignment in the workflows. Also check the method that is assigned to the cancelled step and authorizations to the agent.
Also check the step to see if there are termination steps? if not, check when does is it sets to complete.
However, if the item is logically deleted, you cannot do anything on this.

Getting problem with reusable workflow

I have one reusable workflow. it having more conditions and statements, it is associated to Case Library(Library name-- which holds all case details) . Based on workflow outcome status cases are forwarding to next level. Case library have case
start date, case due date , Case KPI durations columns. Base on case start date case due date , KPI Duration values are updating. Current image will represent conditions and statements
According to workflow condition KPI Duration has to update minimum 14. but some cases(Items) KPI Duration column is updating as an 13, 12,-761 values .
I have not found any errors are exception or workflow related issues in 14 bin\log folder also. Please help me...

Hi Chakravarthy,
The values are less that 14 is because the Find Interval Between Dates action in the workflow.
The action will use the second date to minus the first date in order to get the days between the two dates, so if the second date is less that the first date, then the value will be negative.
So in your case, if Today is earlier than Case Start Date, then the Variable: Case KPI Duration will be a negative number.
I recommend to add a condition after the first step in the workflow to convert the Variable: Case KPI Duration to a positive number.
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Problem while Integrating workflow with OID.

Hi I have a problem with integrating workflow with OID.I must execute the wf_ldap.synch_all() but I couldn't find WF_LDAP package body in the database.There is only package specification.How I can restore the wf_ldap package.
Thanks for help..

The file WFLDAPB.pls should be used to recreate the package body for WF_LDAP (this file is in the wf/sql directory).

Workflow problem with status Ready

HI,
I have a problem with the workflow not getting completed.
The workflow is for the employee attendace 20000081 .
After the manager of the employee accepts the leave application posted by employee , The workflow is in the following state: -
ID 000000340552 Work item type    Background step
Work Item text Find Employee .
Status <b>Ready</b>
Now the question is there any background job which needs to be scheduled for changing the all the workitem with status 'Ready' to be executed .
since once I execute this step manually then the workflow again goes in the ready status with the next step and the next step in this case is 'Create attendance/absence' This stpe of the workflow is in again status 'Ready'.
Please let me know if some know about this problem.
Thanks in advance .
Ankur

Hi ,
Thanks for the prompt reply.
I have tried the auto customizing and I am geeting the following log generated :
Auto-Customizing: General tasks
         E WZ:119 Instances for task TS60001307 already exist
Task TS60001307     not classified as general task
         E WZ:119 Instances for task TS70008037 already exist
Task TS70008037     not classified as general task
         E WZ:119 Instances for task TS70008125 already exist
Task TS70008125     not classified as general task
And while checking the customizing setting in SWU3 the folling entires exists but as I understand the seeting is proper, please have alook below:
An active plan version exists
     Workflow administrator maintained
     RFC destination: User locked
     Generic decision task classified completely
     Tasks for document generation fully classified
     T77* tables all available
     Monitoring job for missed deadlines is scheduled
     Monitoring job for work items with errors is scheduled
     Sending to objects and HR objects activated
     Entries missing in PD control tables
     Default Domain for Internet Mail Maintained
Workflow development environment
     Customizing incomplete
Prefix numbers for standard object types maintained
     An active plan version exists
     T77* tables all available
     Number range defined for customer tasks
     Entries missing in PD control tables
Please let me know if this is not proper .
Thanks and Regards,
Ankur

File association problems with Win2K server

Hi,
I have a client - 5 Macs in a Win2K network. They're designers and store/work on all their jobs on a Win2K volume. About 2 months ago, problems started happening - files lost their application association (mostly all were turned into Unix exec files), causing sever problems with the workflow. Quark can't open a placed image in it's native app for instance, because the association has been lost. The user has to visit each file and re-associate. As you can imagine, this is not an ideal situation to say the least.
Furthermore, when re-associating the files, the option to "Always open with" is greyed out, so a one-time fix isn't possible.
I suspected that it was something to do with the windoze volume. I more or les proved it by copying one of the files to a local machine and then re-associating: all works as it should when the files are local. Copying the files locally is not an option though.
This really is at the limit of my windoze knowledge. Their sysadmin is also not sure what's happening, aside from the fact that there's no windoze app that's accessing the files and writing them back to the disk. The only thing that looks at the files is the daily backup and that's a read and not write operation. We're stumped, but it really needs sorting. I've suggested they move some of the files to another server and see if the same occurs, which may or may not prove the issue is with the server they're using now. Any guidance gratefully received.
All Macs at 10.4.5 and recent updates, all have QXP 6.5, CS2.

Probably nothing has changed with your server or your network. Typically, folks realize, "Hey! I can connect via SMB and that's my workaround for the 31 character file name limit!" Or possibly, your Mac folks are browsing the network for your server and selecting it through your Windows domain rather than a Mac zone. Tiger changed the appearance of Windows "WORKGROUPS" so that they now appear as upper/lower case instead of all caps. This use to be a good way to distinguish them from zones.
To guarantee your users are connecting via AFP, which is what I would recommend for a Mac workgroup, have them specifically use "afp://servername" in the "Connect to Servers" dialog. I don't recommend Apple's SMB because Mac OS X splits each file into separate resource and data fork files before placing them on the server. When Windows folks see this, it's a mess. And I don't recommend continuing to use Microsoft's SFM because its version of the AFP protocol hasn't been updated in years. Either way, look to a third party software solution.
Don't let the 65+ GB scare you. It's really not that bad if you're on a 100MB network but the server should recognize that all traffic is local and actually handle all the file moves itself without shuffling files across the network. A bit of a pain, but shouldn't take too long.
Good luck! bill
1 GHz Powerbook G4 Mac OS X (10.4.5)

Problem with WS14000086 worrkflow

Hello Experts,
I am facing a problem with a workflow. I have activated a standard workflow WS14000086 for "no approval on Contract Release". But when releasing the contract the status remains as "awaiting approval".
I have made all the standard settings and start conditions for this workflow. On testing this workflow using Tcode SWDD, message stating: Error while creating a work item 65610.
Can somebody throw some light on this issue
Rgds
Amit

Hi,
1. GOTO Transaction SWUD
2. enter workflow WS14000086, press enter
3. execute 'Test environment'
4. check 'Including subworkflows'
5. execute 'Consistency check for components'
If there are no errors for this workflow then the problem
should be resolved.
Else.
In the workflow builder (SWDD) use the navigation Area to check every workflow.Double click in each step, if the step had a subworkflow, then open the subworhflow, checked it, and if it appeared the same error use the function module for the subworkflow.
i.e
USE TRX SWDD.
Enter Workflow ex: WS14000086.
Select Header button (Hat)
Select Tab "Version-Dependent" (Header Tab)
Select Tab "Reviewer" (Sub Tab)
Check subworkflow: ex WS14000084
Goto TRX SE37
Enter Function Module: SWD_WFD_REPLICATE_FROM_9999
Press: <F8> or execute
Enter Subworkflow : WS14000084 in Field IM_Task
Press: <F8> or execute
HTH.
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward full points for useful answers.

Problem with cproject workflow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for