Recurring inspection for a batch with early date

Dear Gurus,
I have a batch with retest date 31.07.2010
I need to create the inspection lot of recurring inspection for this batch today.
I use transaction QA07, but this will not work for days earlier than today.
I tried to create the lot manually, the lot was created but the quantity was not transferred to the Quality inspection and remained unrestricted.
I need to create the lot and transfer the quantity to quality inspection....how can I handle this case?
Regards,
MaX

Well, nothing is unacceptable. It's just that it needs a lot of documentation. You don't change the date and leave it. You change the date, manually run QA07 to create the 09 inspection and immediately change the date back again. With proper documentation and approval from the QA department this shouldn't be an issue. I am assuming this is a one time thing. It's not like you are advocating a new business process.
The batch record should already be self documenting already and show a record of all changes. While the FDA would frown on this being a regular business practice, if it is something that happens once and the proper paperwork is done. It shouldn't be an issue. It would however cause an auditor to probably ask what caused this in the first place, what was the corrective action applied to prevent it from happening again, how many times has this happened and is it expected to happen in the future. If all of that can be answered, there shouldn't be any issue.
FF

Similar Messages

Recurring inspection for blocked stock

Hi all
I am trying to create an inspection lot for recurring inspection for my material. Now the stock for this material is currently blocked. What I want to know is if its possible to have blocked stock moved into quality inspection for recurring inspection.
Regards
Obie

Hi Obie,
I am not sure but it may not be feasible to move the batch stock from block stock to quality inspection with recurring inspection. As I checked in OMJJ, I did not find QA07 transaction code as allowable for 349 movement.
On the contrary, once the batch reaches to its expiry, stock can be posted to QI or block from unrestricted.
I would suggest to use 08 inspection type for transferring material from block to quality inspection.
Regards,
Anand Rao

I am planning to switch to the "iPhone for Life Plan" with unlimited data. How do i determine what the balance is on my equipment installment plan?

I am planning to switch to the "iPhone for Life Plan" with unlimited data. How do i determine what the balance is on my equipment installment plan?

Yes I am considering switching from the VZ Edge to Sprint iPhone for Life plan.
Thanks,
Adrian
>> Personal information removed to comply with the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service <<
Edited by: Verizon Moderator

Process Order creates Multiple Inspection for Same Batch

Hi Guys,
Expert opinion is needed to have this issue fixed.
Issue:When a new Process Order is created it automatically creates in storage location A. There are times when a process order needs to be created into another storage location B. When the Process Order is created and then is changed from A to B it will create two inspection lots for one batch, one for each storage location. From the plant perspective they only need one Inspection lot as they will not create two set of samples for testing since it is the same batch it just went into a different storage location then it was originally created for. Is there a way to change SAP so that it only creates one Inspection lot per batch.
Control InspLot field in QM view for Insp Type 04 is X
We had different scenarios with same Batch
SCENARIO #1: Sloc is changed to B prior to Release, in CRTD status of order Sloc was A
So there are 2 Insp. Lot created one for A & another for B after GR in Sloc B
SCENARIO #2: Sloc is changed to B after Release
IL is created after Release of order with Sloc A, after changing Sloc B in process order and performing GR, new IL is created for Sloc B
Business scenario is certain times of the year where one creates a PO with one Sloc and then it needs to be GR into a different Sloc.
They are generating a lot of IL’s that are not used and it seems like every year they need to get UD’s made on IL’s for finance to close out the year which is cumbersome.
Please suggest way out, objective is one process should have one IL per Batch irrespective of Sloc
Regards
Nitin Desai

There are several things that come to mind.
First and foremost, get the planning right so that the process orders are created properly the first time around. This is a business issue. Yes.. I don't know your business.. no, you really aren't all that different then the thousands of other businesses using SAP. The root cause of this is you don't know what is going where when you order it or in the case of process orders, where you intend to make it or store it. That's a basic planning problem.
2 - you must have early lot creation turned on, "Y". You can't be using "X". X would only create an 04 lot when you do the GR so if you change the storage location prior to the Process order being released I'm not sure how you are generating two lots. Are you sure all the lots in question are 04 lots? Are you maybe seeing an 03 lot? Or possibly an 08 lot? Something doesn't sound right here.
3 - If you receive into two storage locations from one process order, you will get two inspection lots. No way around this. There is stock associated with these. You could use customization to suppress the second receipt but that stock would go right to UR with no inspection.
4. Don't change the storage locations in the process orders at all. You can use the stock posting screen in the UD and change the storage location when you make the UD.
5. Another option is to again, don't change the storage location in the PO but use QAC2 transaction to transfer the inspection lot into the proper storage location.
You need to explain your scenarios better cause I really don't see how you are getting the two lots when you make all your changes in the process order prior to releasing the process order. That doesn't make any sense at all.
Craig

Query for onhand qunatity with particular date for eam

hi all ,
following query are showing wrong value for on hand quantity with particular date mean work order issue date for quantity .
can u show me where is problem in this query.
SELECT   ood.organization_name, wrov.concatenated_segments item_number,
         wrov.item_description description, wrov.item_primary_uom_code uom,
        -- SUM (on_hand.on_hand) quantity_in_stock,
          SUM (on_hand.on_hand) + wrov.quantity_issued quantity_in_stock,
         we.wip_entity_name work_order_number,
         TRUNC (we.creation_date) work_order_date,
         fu.user_name work_order_made_by, wrov.quantity_issued,
         trunc(cic.material_cost,2) issue_rate_per_qty,
         wrov.quantity_issued * trunc(cic.material_cost,2) quantity_value,
         --SUM (on_hand.on_hand) - wrov.quantity_issued balace_qty,
         SUM (on_hand.on_hand) balace_qty,
           SUM (on_hand.on_hand)
         * trunc(cic.material_cost,2) COST,
         eam.ATTRIBUTE1 EQUIPEMENT_NO
        -- gcc.SEGMENT6 equipement_no
    FROM wip_entities we,
         wip_requirement_operations_v wrov,
         org_organization_definitions ood,
         mtl_onhand_total_mwb_v on_hand,
         fnd_user fu,
         cst_item_costs cic,
         eam_work_orders_v eam
--                    gl_code_combinations gcc,
--                    WIP_TRANSACTION_ACCOUNTS wta ,
--                    WIP_TRANSACTIONS wt
   WHERE wrov.wip_entity_id = we.wip_entity_id
     AND ood.organization_id = wrov.organization_id
     AND wrov.inventory_item_id = on_hand.inventory_item_id
     AND on_hand.organization_id = ood.organization_id
     AND we.created_by = fu.user_id(+)
     AND cic.inventory_item_id = wrov.inventory_item_id
     AND cic.organization_id = wrov.organization_id
     --AND we.wip_entity_name = '179542'
     AND wrov.organization_id = nvl(:organization_id,wrov.organization_id)
            AND (we.wip_entity_name = :job_order_No OR :job_order_No IS NULL)
            and trunc(we.creation_date) between nvl(:from_date ,trunc(we.creation_date)) and nvl(:too_date ,trunc(we.creation_date))
           and eam.WIP_ENTITY_NAME=we.wip_entity_name
           and eam.WORK_ORDER_STATUS in('Complete','Complete - No Charges' ,'Released')
--                 and gcc.CODE_COMBINATION_ID =wta.REFERENCE_ACCOUNT
--                 and wta.TRANSACTION_ID =wt.TRANSACTION_ID
--                 and we.wip_entity_id =wta.WIP_ENTITY_ID
GROUP BY ood.organization_name,
         wrov.concatenated_segments,
         wrov.item_description,
         wrov.item_primary_uom_code,
         we.wip_entity_name,
         we.creation_date,
         fu.user_name,
         wrov.quantity_issued,
         cic.material_cost,
          eam.ATTRIBUTE1
       -- gcc.SEGMENT6
       order by we.wip_entity_name

I don't think there is any special predicate to do that, Code is simply getting all children of given asset and returning them (Offcource there is some ordering logic). If You want exact informaiton I would suggest to use json call that DAM is making i.e.
HOST:POST/<PATH OF DAM>.assets.json
Or decompile AssetListServlet.java ans see how it is implemeted
Yogesh
www.wemblog.com

Publication for Deski report with multiple data providers

Hi,
Has anyone been able to get a publication working that uses a Deski report with multiple data providers as the source? I'm trying to get a publication working that uses dynamic recipients and personalization. When I try to schedule the publication, I get the error "Object not found".
Thanks,
Debbie

Debbie,
That's standard.
It's useful for emulating outer joins in reports.
Say you've got a sales report where you want to display all 12 months of the year in a crosstab whatever month you run in.
We're only in May at the moment though. With one data provider (SALES), you'll get a crosstab with just up to May for your months.
If you create a separate data provider called MONTHS to return the months in the current year, you will then have a merged dimension of YearMonth in both.
In your crosstab if you just use YearMonth you'll get just the five months. If you qualify it with its data provider name (in our case MONTHS), you'll see the full twelve months shown.
I hope that clears it up for your.
Regards,
Mark

Yearly once inspection for specific characteristic with out inspec. lot

Hi Experts,
My client want some specific characteristic inspection yearly once with out inspection lot.
help me how to map this scenario
Regards,
Sbabu
Edited by: sbabu babu on Apr 22, 2010 12:27 PM

I dont think any standard solution for this,
few suggestions are
Go for a manual lot, client can track manual lot generation based on a report. report can be ABAP deveoped based on the client requirements. So every day client can run report and know which all materials are to be inspected on that day. I feel this as best.
DMR may have an issue as unnecessarily lot will get generated throughout the year in system. Its OK, we can do auto UD and all, but think do we really need these data go into system for rest 364 days for that one day inspection. If you ask me, I will say no to it.
Calibration lots can be generated only for equipments. Its only fixed time based inspection lot. But here material need to be maintained as equipment. i dont think, this is acceptable. Try first one which worked out well for me. Jus a report for tracking.
Thanks
Vineeth Varghese

Need Certificate Widget for Cap 5 with Auto Date

Okay, folks--I've spent a half day on this and it's time to throw up my hands. I've wandered all over the internet, sure I would find the answer, but no.
I'm not a Flash developer or a code afficianado. I'm just your average instructional designer trying to get along with Captivate 5. I don't want to create a bunch of new stuff. I want the functionality there for me. I did research and try to see what it would take for me to develop my own certificate widget, but it sort of defeats the whole rapid e-learning premise, if you know what I mean!
I just want a certificate of completion widget that A) allows the user to enter his name B) autofills the date C) actually inserts my logo instead of asking for the file and then doing nothing with it C) prints out when you click the print button. Where can I put my hands on such a widget that will function in CAPTIVATE 5?
(Why, OH WHY, doesn't the certificate of completion work the way it did in Captivate 4? In desperation, I tried loading the widget that was used for 4, but it's not happy in 5. And WHY would you have it available in the award certificate and not the completion certificate? I don't want to AWARD them. I want to acknowleded that they successfully completed a tutorial.)

By the way the certificate widget doesn't work using the instructions in "Using Adobe Captivate 5" manual (which are actually 4s instructions), no blank slide with a variable of v_Name is required.
The correct instructions for 5 are:
Insert a blank slide after the quiz result and insert the certificate widget, choose the layout and add information:
·         Name of the course
·         Date on which the course was taken or leave default dates which fill in automatically upon completion
·         Signature of Authority
Once published, before the certificate is displayed, there is an auto generated page by the widget requiring the user to input a name, and to use the Submit button. The name automatically is inserted on the Certificate. It can also be tested by Previewing it.
Note: This still didn't work for me after I had set up the certificate widget according to the manual and after much research I found that if you have already created a variable in Project/Variables named v_Name, in order to get the certificate to work in Captivate 5 the variable needs to be removed from Project/Variables.
Captivate may tell you it can't remove the variable and that it is attached to a slide, however once you remove the slide that it was used on and delete it from the library you can remove the variable. As a precaution, I shut down Captivate and reopened it to clear any temp memory, then checked to see if the variable was gone and it was. At that point I inserted the certificate following the instructions above and it worked correctly.
Good luck, Scharolet

AppleScript for mail merge with Excel data?

Is there any approach for an AppleScript that lets you use Excel data as source for some kind of mail merge operations? If not, would anyone here be interested if someone (I?) would take a closer look at some kind of a (AppleScript Studio) solution for this?

I'm not sure I get the question.
If it is "could you use AppleScript to create mail merge for Pages with Excel?", the answer is, Yes. Both Pages and Excel are scriptable.
If the question is "has anyone done it yet?", I don't know, but it could be a fun exercise.
If the question is "would there be a market, if someone (you?) wrote and released such a script?", I cannot tell, but personally I would probably write a hack that worked only for my own needs - if I had them. The overhead with usability, testing, different address formats, languages, different Excel sheet formats, and so on, makes me guess that the investment wouldn't pay off for a generic solution. Especially considering both Pages and MS Office already have their own mail merge functions.

FR Studio - Is there a workaround for the issue with referencing data from a grid with a different DB connection and different # of dimensions?

Hi,
I am trying to reference a column in a different grid with a different database connection. I did some research in the forums, and it seems like this is a known issue with FR Studio. The issue is that if the 2 different database connections have different # of dimensions, then the reference will throw an error.
For example, what I'm trying to do is below:
In grid2.column[A], I have the following formula:
grid1.column[A]
The result is an error.
The ultimate goal is to have a basic variance formula in the grid between grid1 and grid2, which have different database connections with a different # of dimensions. Is there a workaround at all to this bug? The example of the basic formula is below:
grid1.column[A] - grid2.column[A]
Any help is much appreciated!
Thanks,
Tiffany

Thanks for the detailed response Mike.
The issue with trying it in Grid1 vs Grid2 is that Grid1's DB connection has more dimensions than Grid2's DB connection. I can't change the DB connection to a database with more dimensions because you have to be able to map all dimensions from the existing DB connection (Grid1) to the new DB connection (Grid2). This isn't possible, so instead I have to map Grid2 (less dimensions) to Grid1 (more dimensions). It just ignores the extra dimensions from Grid1. Does that make sense?
Thanks again for your responses. It's very much appreciated.
Tiffany

Search help for custome field with different data type

Hi Friends,
I have Created a custom table in which i have created a field is
ZMATLONG which stores material number.
Now the data element is zdmat which is of char 40..
Now i want to give search help for this field ZMATLONG..
I have tried many ways giving search help to this field
a) i Tried to attach the standard search help of MATNR ie : MAT1 but its showing me data type inconsistancy
b) i created a zsearch help and in the selection method i have used database table mara , again here iam getting the same error data type inconsistancy...
Now how can i give the search help like matnr field to my custom field ZMATLONG...
How can i do it..?
Thanks in Advance..
Regards
Kumar

Hi,
MATNR ahs length 18 and ZMATLONG has length 40.So due to this u cannot use MAT1 search help.
best way would be cope MAT1 into Z search help. Then in the search help parameter change the data element of field
MATNR as ZMATLONG.
Now if you assign Z search help to ZMATLONG it will work.
I tried this its working fine.
Shanmugavel Chandrasekaran

OIM 11g support for Temporary roles with expiration date

Dear All,
Is there a support provided for temporary roles in OIM 11g?
If not, what is the recommendation as for implementation?
Kind regards
Maria Adair

I'm also interested if someone has any recommendation as for how to implement such a feature. Anyone has any ideas?

Recurring inspection date -how to update

Hi experts,
I am doing recurring inspection of a batch B1 of material X with inspection interval=4 days which has been manufactured on 17.09.2014 and its next inspection date is 21.09.2014 if we see in MSC2N.
In QM07 i am putting "initial days =4" and a lot is formed. I did UD of that lot and cleared.
Now my question is how will my batch update with next inspection date as 21+4=25.09.2014 or i have to do it manually.How can i fullfill requirement of recurring inspection of batch will lot formation on interval of 4 days?

Hi Amit,
You need to schedule background job using transaction QA05 using variant.
If the background job is scheduled daily, the system creates inspection lots as per the control parameters in the variant.
1. Lot Creation only: The system creates inspection lots for the selected batches when the next inspection date is within the opening period automatically as per your indicator set on the initial screen.
2. To inspection stock at lot creation: The system creates inspection lots for the selected batches when the next inspection date is within the opening period. When the inspection lots are created, it posts the batch stock to inspection stock. If an inspection lot already exists, the stocks are also posted to inspection stock and the inspection lot is updated accordingly.
3. Block batch at lot creation: The system creates inspection lots for the selected batches and blocks the batches by changing their status to "restricted." If the batch status management function is not active, the stock is posted to blocked stock.
4. To inspection stock at inspection date: The system posts the batch stock to inspection stock when the next inspection date is reached. If an inspection lot already exists, the system updates the existing inspection lot. If a lot does not exist, the system creates one.
5. Block batch at inspection date: The system blocks the batch when the next inspection date is reached. If the batch status management function is not active in your plant, the stock is posted to blocked stock.
Please find screen snap on the initial screen attached.
Regards,
Gururaj Kulkarni

Missing: Bluetooth with Enhanced Data Rate for vista

I was looking for the "Bluetooth with Enhanced Data Rate Software II" for vista
After I found the right page (http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=MIGR-67250), it seem their is no link to the setup file
Any ideas?

glev55's link to the x6x Vista drivers is also fixed now.
Thanks to whoever reported it through Site Feedback!
I don't work for Lenovo. I'm a crazy volunteer!

Search of batches with specified input value of charactristic

Dear Experts,
Does anybody know, is there a standard transaction to see the bathces of materials having next inspection date with specified input criteria?
For e.g. I want to see the batches of materials having next inspection date between 01.01.2011 to 31.12.2011 (One month selection).
Regards
Vivek

You can use the batch cockpit for this if you want. BMBC
You can also add the batch characteristic LOBM_QNDAT to your batch classes and use CL30n for finding batches with specific values in them.
FF

Recurring inspection for a batch with early date

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for