Process order-Variance yield error

Dear all,
Kindly find below first image,in short/exc tab yield variance exist
But in second image in short/exc tab yield variance not exist.
Regards
Rajasekaran

Hi Raja,
What is the order qty? is it 110 ? For how much qty confirmation is done..is it 100.. and during confirmation scrap is entered as 10..what is the status of process order DLV..?
are you using any assembly scrap ? check in material master in MRP1 view and confirm ..can you check all this and confirm...
Thanks
Kumar

Similar Messages

  • Process order variance calculation not taking the GI+Activity confirmation Cost

    Hi,
    Process oder was settled in the Month of June,2014. Accounting document was generated,but system only considered the GR cost. System was not considered  the GI as well as activity cost on variance calculation. Variance posted GR= Variance.
    22nd June,2014 Variance calculated, on 30th WIP entery also reversed with the same amount.
    1st July,Order done untecho and no transactions are posted in the Month of July.
    Now they would like to settle the Process in the Month of July. system is throwing the error " Status DLV/TECHO reversed after settlement period 006.2014"
    Order status was TECO PRT  CNF  PRC  CSER BASC BCRQ CRF No variance calculation status.
    Any one faced any similar issue , please suggest me how to proceed.

    Hi,
    Please check SAP Note 386816 for error KV181.
    In general it is recommended to use the Cost estimate of the Process Order (Planned Cost Estimate) for the WIP at target calculation. In additional please pay attention to SAP Note 386816 which explains this procedure and which prerequisites must be met to calculate WIP at targets or the scrap variance. Even if the group counter of the routing is different you can still calculate WIP at targets but only if the message type of message KV181 is set to SPACE by Customizing settings.
    Hope this will a bit help to you.
    Best regards, Takashi

  • Process order variance calculation

    Hi All,
    We have Sub- Assemblies which are currently set up in the system as purchased, sub-contracted sub-assemblies. this is how we will procure these the large majority of the time. There will be instances, however, where we will need to build them in house. but when we run cost estimate and mark and release sytem is using sub-contract Quantity structure in cost roll and when we producing we are using different Quantity structure like like BoM and Routing.at the time of variance calulation we are getting errors becuase of conflict in cost estimate Quantity structure and process order Quantity structure.
    How can i solve this issue?any help is appreciated...
    I'm getting the following error..
    Message no. KV181
    Diagnosis
    This message tells you which quantity structure was used by the cost estimate that calculated the target costs, and which quantity structure was used in the actuals.
    The cost estimate that calculated the target costs did not use the quantity structure used in the actuals.
    This means that the cost estimate used a different combination of task list type, task list group, and group counter than in the order itself (such as the production order).
    Example:
    Suppose the target costs were calculated in the standard cost estimate for the material, and that the standard cost estimate for the material is based on the routing identified by task list type N, task list group 50000309, and group counter 1.
    Now suppose the production order specifies a routing identified by task list type N, task list group 50000309, and group counter 2. This would lead to the error.
    System Response
    The system cannot calculate target costs for the valuation of work in process or scrap.
    See also:
    Routing/master recipe in actuals differs from qty structure for target
    Thanks,
    Anusha

    Hi,
    Please check SAP Note 386816 for error KV181.
    In general it is recommended to use the Cost estimate of the Process Order (Planned Cost Estimate) for the WIP at target calculation. In additional please pay attention to SAP Note 386816 which explains this procedure and which prerequisites must be met to calculate WIP at targets or the scrap variance. Even if the group counter of the routing is different you can still calculate WIP at targets but only if the message type of message KV181 is set to SPACE by Customizing settings.
    Hope this will a bit help to you.
    Best regards, Takashi

  • Process Order variances.

    To look at our daily Labour and Material variances we run the general ledger report listing all Process orders for the week to date. We also have a report called MCRQ that should pull all the orders togeather. If we run these for the same dates they are always different? Also you can find Process orders on one report without it being on the other, why would this happen?

    ??

  • Process order SLOC maintenance error message

    Good Day SAP expert!
    Previously when we were in SAP4.5, when an SLOC is manually assigned to a component inside the process order, we get a warning message if the material is not yet maintained in the SLOC.
    In ECC, we get an error message that the SLOC is not found for a certain material. Can this message be configured to give only warning instead of error?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    Thanks for the reply. Where is the config you have mentioned?
    In response to other advise to enter the material-SLOC in MMSC, we do know this setup but would like to avoid it since once you move inventory in a specific location, the SLOC view would automatically be created thus no need for MMSC initially for new materials. We would like to have the previous warning message only so that user can proceed manual assignment in Process order instead of getting error.

  • Process order variance

    Dear experts,
    Here is process order scenario
    In that i am doing variance calculation for one order
    but it is giving message that "no order could be processed "
    Plz guide me what could be reason
    thanks in advance
    regards
    sachin ghogale

    Dear
    Before doing variance calculation check your order status it must be DLV status.
    1. After Final Confirmation of Order (Status: CNF) make GR for order using T.code: MIGO / MB31 so Production Order Status will be DLV.
    2. Then complete the order technically by using T.code: CO02--> Functions (Menu)---> Restrict Processing -
    > Technically Complete. You can carry out TECO for multiple Orders in T.code: COHV (Mass Processing).
    3. Now Calculate Overheads using T.code: KGI2 - Individual Processing
    CO43 - Collective Processing

  • Error when closing a process order

    Hi
    I am getting an error when trying to close a process order.
    The error is - KW407"No prices could be determined for object Activity type XXXX/XXXX/SET". I have checke the following:
    1. KP26 the price has been maintained.
    2. Have checked that the cost element assigned for the actuvuty is "43"
    3. The Valuation variant is maintained correctly.
    Please let me know what could be wrong and how the order can be closed.
    Karthik

    Hi Karthik,
    Error message class KW relate to ABC costing. Did you use template and OH group and assigned in Materil master or in the costing sheet. if so
    Have you correctly assigned the template to OH group KTPF?
    If this is not the case, please check your MRP settings in the material master.
    Hope you need to change the planning strategy? please check with PP guys.
    Thanks
    Velumani

  • Error during Process order settlement

    Hi Gurus,
    i am facing problem during the process order settlement. an error is occured is as follows: Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZTAXIN.
    actually this V0 tax code is assing to the ZTAXIN procedure & which is also assign to country. i couldn't get why it ask tax code during the settlement.
    In Process order Itemization i find the 2 GL ( Element) in which there is one consumption GL & second is COFG sold GL. from GL Master i remove both GL Tax category & also remove the click from posting without tax allowed. till i am facing this problem?
    Please help me to overcome this issue.
    Point will be rewarded if question solved.
    Than'x
    Dhananjay R

    hi gopan,
    Than'x for attention on my question. till my problem is not solved. during the process order why it hit the tax code? would u please guide me how to find the tax code assignment which hit during the process order settlement?
    i have check all the Tax related setting till this issue not solved. ( Check calculation procedure (OBYG), Tax code assignment (FTXP), also check the Tax Account Integration (OB40).
    also i remove tax related assignment from the GL master related to specific gl which are display in component structure.
    pls help me to solve this issue..
    Than'x
    Dhananjay

  • Variance Calculation In Process order

    Dear All Gurus,
    We have produt cost by order.
    In process order variance calculation I am gatting variance  being calculated on Input v/s output costs.
    While settlement also same variance is being posted.
    I want variance to be calculated target v/s Actual
    Please advice
    Thanks in advance
    Bhushan

    I think in production order the variance is calculated between actual costs vs planned costs which is nothing but the input costs minus the gr coss of material produced at std costs.
    Is that happenning or not??

  • Settlement of process order

    In PP-PI  We want to use active ingredient for scenario:
    Our Raw material is MINING ORE which will have varying proportion of COPPER & COBALT.
    Valuation of ORE is based on itu2019s content of COPPER & COBALT content. So we will use active ingredient to capture value of this raw material based on it content of CU & CO.
    Now when we issue this material for production to process order, our semi finished output ( Say SFG1) will also have varying content of COPPER & COBALT based on kind of input quality. There will several process orders doing diff. processe.
    Now my query is
    1)     Can we settle the process order variance to COPPER & COBALT content of SFG1 instead of normal settlement to SFG1?
    2)     Can I maintain my valuation of SFG1 based on COPPER & COBALT content?
    3)     Do we have any user exit or BADI available to replace SFG1 with CO& CU in process order settlement rule?
    4)     In standard cost estimate can we capture COPPER & COBALT characteristics?
    Ultimately COPPER & COBALT are our finished goods.
    I try to search sap help but not much info to help me on this.
    Your input will be highly appreciated.
    Nitesh

    Hi,
    The concept explained is typically a co-product scenario:
    Ore produces SEMI COPPER and SEMI COBALT.  SEMI COPPER and SEMI COBALT produce FIN COPPER and FIN COBALT.
    This scenario is covered under u2018CO-PROUDUCTu2019 concept.  Here Ore is Raw Material, SEMI COPPER and SEMI COBALT are SEMI-PRODUCT and finally COPPER and COBALT are Finished Product.
    Now estimate the standard cost for your SEMI-PRODUCTS and FINISHED PRODUCTS using integrated BOM.  Sit with your PP Consultant who can give you good input for costing the products whether based on quanity yield or quality yield.
    Once this is tested and found the results are expected, the solution can be freezed.
    Please let me know your feed back.
    Regards,
    Ashok

  • Process Order Settlement Rule by Order Type

    Hi Experts
    Our Client  a requirement to have Process Order Settlement by Order Type please let me know how it can be achieved
    In SAP  a Process Order Variance is settled via the following Combination in OBYC  :-
    1 Chart of Accounts
    2 Transaction PRD
    3 Valuation Modifier
    4 General Modifier
    5 Valuation Class
    6 GL Account
    Can   this account assignment based on the Order Type ?
    Thanks
    Suman

    Dear Suman,
    Normally, Order Types serves a different purpose. We can maintain default settlement rule, Costing Variants, Settlement Profiles, Number ranges etc at Order Type Level.
    It is not possible to directly manage the Order Types in the Account Assignment in OBYC.
    Thanks & Kind Regards
    Umapathi G

  • ABAP Dump in Process Order

    Hi,
    I have made a process order. Now when i go and try to do anything in it it goes to dump.
    It shows Exception condition "OPR_NOT_FOUND" raised.
    can you ex

    I have applied the OSS note and got a solution . I want to replicate the error but I am not able to do so..
    I want to know why does this error  comes.
    How to create a process order with this error.

  • Process order erro

    HI Friends,
    When i excute the process order i got error message " Debit with cost element 943110 cannot be settled." kindly give me reply asap. kindly give me detail info how can i solve this issue.
    Warm Regards
    Bobby

    Hi,
    I had faced the same problem please refer SAP Note 198931.
    Hope it will work for you.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Proces order variance settlement posting to multiple accounts in FI

    Dear,
    Settlement of process order variance is controlled via GBB - AUA, where a different account can be used by valuation class. Our requirement is to post on a different account by variance category though. Any idea wheher this is possible / which user-exit?
    txs, Koen De Groote

    Hello
    It is not possible to post the variances to different GL accounts. However for analysis you can take the different variances to different COPA value fields.
    Sangram

  • Process Order Yield Variance Report

    Hai All,
               I am working on a report which displays the Average Values of---- "Standard Yield , Batch Size, Order Activity Yield, Variance Qty, Activity Yield and Variance Value".
    Now the requirement is that, I have to display all these data for only those Process orders for which the Technical Confirmation is given.
    I need to know the field name of the Technical Confirmation and in which Table it is stored.

    hi
    use this function module
    STATUS_TEXT_EDIT

Maybe you are looking for

  • (very urgent)Difference of amount in vendor account and vendor invoice.

    Dear all, we are facing a issue related with vendor account actually MIRO post for the amount is showing difference compare with vendor invoice, please consider this scenario:- we are having vendor bill/invoice for Rs 1110/- but in SAP amount is show

  • WRT54gs no internet

    my router has no ip address  i have logged in to it and in the status bar there is all 0's. i have also downgraded the firmware for it and have still no joy. if i plug the modem directly to the computer then i can get on the net.  the wireless side o

  • Drive space usage is greater that sum of folder space

    I just created a new boot disk and then restored files from Time Machine. didn't restore everything, which would have amounted to about 248 GB. But when I look at the information (Get Info) for the drive under Devices is is currently showing that the

  • Captivate 8 not letting me print a handout in Word out of my file. I'm getting an error message

    I've been printing other files this morning successfully but now I'm not able to print anything. I've never encountered this problem before. The file is relatively small; only 39 slides. FYI - These are files created in Captivate 7 that I've pulled i

  • Code Formatter

    I want to do a code formatter for COBOL , but have no idea how to do it. I want to plug it in eclipse (but that is the easy part ) . I was wondering if anyone has ever done or at least has an idea how to do the formatter. Not specifically for COBOL,