Product Cost Calculation - WIP calc. - Using Program - SAPKKA07

Dear All,
When we are running the program SAPKK07,We are getting the ABAP Dump.
The errror is given below.
===========================================================================
Information on where termination occurred
The termination occurred in the ABAP/4 program "SAPLKARS " in
"COSLA_1".
The main program was "_SAPKKA07_ ".
The termination occurred in line 203
of the source code of program "LKARSF26 " (when calling the editor 2030).
The program "SAPLKARS " was started as a background job.
==========================================================================
Please advice.
With Best Regards,
Raghu Sharma

Dear All,
We have applied the OSS notes.
The issue is solved.
The question can be closed.
With Regards,
Raghu Sharma

Similar Messages

Production cost calculation for non discrete manufacturing

There is a problem I am facing in B1.
We are into manufacturing of chemicals, wherein your output is never exactly same as what you have given in Bill of materials or at the time of 'issue to production'. For example, I issue goods for a product X thinking that I will get 10 kgs output, but after actual production, the output may be 9.9 kgs or 10.1 kgs or 9.7 or 10.2 or whatever. The output will be close to expectation, but never exactly same. Now, the problem is, the cost of finished product is calculated at the time of issue, and so irrespective of how much output I get, the cost of producing it per unit remains the same, which is not the right way of doing it. It should calculate based on the output received (ie. total cost of inputs divided by output quantity), so when I get more output, the cost of manufacturing will be less, and vice versa. This is also resulting in incorrect journal entries between raw materials to work in progress (WIP) in 'issue to production' document and WIP to finished product in 'Receipt from production' document.
How do I solve this??

The process is:
1. Write a production order and based on it print the production instructions. (I assume it will be a repetitive process with more then one receipt from production.)
2. When the production of a portion is ends, copy the original order, modify the quantities in it according to the actual component and result quantity, make a receipt from production based on it and close this order.
3. For the next portion repeat the process described in the point 2.
4. When there is no more production based on the original order, you can close it.
(Probably there is no need for any stored procedure. )

Total Production Cost calculation

Dear all,
Anybody know where / at which tableI can see the breakdown calculation of Total Product Cost / Production receipt amount, that should inform us about
1. What is component cost
2. Quantity
3. Price
Thank you very much in advance.
Best regards,
Surya

Dear Rahul,
[Rahul]
Now if I issue 500 of CH00, 250 of CH002, 250 of CH003 then my component price will be ((50010)+(25015)+(250*20))=13750
Correct? [Surya] YES
[Rahul]
Now if I receive 1000 of FG001 then my product cost will be 13750/1000=13.75
Correct?   [Surya] YES
[Surya]
I tested your sample here. The result is correct same as I expected.
So when I receipt FG qty < FG plan qty the FG cost is not changed it is still same with 13.75
This is exactly correct. Same as what I'm expect.
But why in my case the result is not correct.
Test case :
BOM for FG-001 qty 120, the child are :
- PFILM qty 10 Roll , unit price 1,500,000
- INK01 qty 5 kg       unit price 75,000
- INK02 qty 2 kg       unit price 60,000
- INK03 qty 1 kg       unit price 65,000
- INK04 qty 1.5 kg    unit price 65,000
- INK05 qty 7.5 kg    unit price 50,000
- INK06 qty 4 kg       unit price 55,000
- SOLVENT qty 25 ltr unit price 10,000
I create production order # 73 with plan qty 120 and production order # 74 qty 120
Production order #73:
- plan qty FG-001 : 120
- good issue : actual component qty = plan qty = bom component qty
- good receipt FG-001 qty 120
- Result for item cost FG-001 : 137,520.83
Production order#74:
- plan qty FG-001 : 120
- good issue : actual component qty = plan qty = bom component qty
- good receipt FG-001 qty 110
- Result for item cost FG-001 : 137,524.96 -
> WHY ?
I expect FG-001 cost should not change even though Receipt Qty <> Plan Qty.
I expcet FG-001 cost is 137,520.83
Thanks Raul for your help.

Which Product Costing is most used By order, By Period, By Sales Order?

Hi,
As you know there are three types of product costing.
Product Cost by Order
Product Cost by Period
Product Cost by Sales Order
May i know which product costing method is widely used in the industries?

Hi Vijay,
Looks like your working on MTO and MTS pocess.I am new to Make To Order and Make to Stock controlling process and client like to implement Make To Order with SD integration. have you worked on these processes? Please explain me what is Make to Order and Make to Stock Process in Controlling (SAP-CO) and configuration in CO.
If you can provide process design documents and configuration documents to me.
anusha.r3 at gmail
Thanks & Regards,
Anusha

Product Costing related: where-used on a part and then recost every part

Hi,
I want to find out in SAP product costing function, is there a "where-used" function for a part number, and then able to see every product that ties to this part number; then the ability to recost those products that are tie to this part number?!
Thanks,
Ali

Hi Alice
You question is not clear. please re frame
The product costing is done for all material by T code CK 11 N or CK 40 for material for period ex ( every month are every 3 months like that ).
The quantity structure that is BOM and Routing is used to do product costing to capture materials used and the activity hrs and cost for activity.
I am clear about recosting of product??. costing is done in all company periodically.
CS 15 Tcode will give you material where used list in BOM only.

Product Costing - Message CK 318 ()

Hi Experts,
While executing product cost calculation for material YYY we had warning message CK318 - Cost estimate for material XXX contains errors -> Planned price). XXX is a component used in YYY and the message was issued because we did not have price for XXX. We are now able to proceed with standard cost release for YYY.
As I remembered previously, if you have an error in lower level, the higher level material would have been costed with error too. Seems that this is no longer the case.
I am not sure if this has changed in standard system in ECC 6 or we have to change message control for this message from Warning (W) to Error (E) but it seems the system reaction is not logical to me.
Thanks for shedding insights into this.
Teck

HI Teck,
Can you go to OKKN, and quantity structure tab and check out the 'transfer active std cost meates if material costed with errors check box?
Best Regards
Vimal

Product Cost Collectors not settled to GL's during Period end Close

Hi,
We are using the repetative manufacturing process. We have an issue with our repetative manufacturing orders, during the monthly period end close.The product cost collectors WIP is not been settled to GL's.
The normal production orders are been settled to the GL's and both use the same settlement profile.
Can anyone suggest where could be the problem?
Thanks,
Srini

Hi,
In the SAP standard (as per the transaction codes indicated by you) it is not possible to include multiple plants. Either you have to execute for one Plant or for all plants. Probably, in Test run you can execute for all Plants and check the results, and then decide.
Thanks
Murali.

Rem product cost collector

Hai gurus,
I have one doubt in REM product cost calculation.
1) when I am running PCC for REM I met with following error as - Routing does not match with selection
ID 01.
How to correct the error.
Regards,
sekar chand.

Dear Sekar,
1.While creating product cost collector,use Production version as the controlling level.
2.Check RM01 is the order type and ensure your production version is without any errors.
3.Ensure you have selected rate routing in the task list type in the production version.
4.Check what routing selection id is assigned in MRP parameters in OPPQ and also in the scheduling
parameters in OPU5 for the order type PE.
5,Your routing selection id should be a one which gives the first priority to the rate routing R.
Now check and come back with your further queries.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Stagebox camera converter and Typhoon Ingest Card lower broadcast video production costs with Ethernet

The broadcast video market is in a transition period between the use of proprietary broadcast-specific networks and Ethernet. The proprietary broadcast video network protocols came into existence because, at the time, Ethernet speeds and standards were not up to the demands of live video production. Now they are. Ethernet-based broadcast networks promise to reduce video production costs by allowing the use of standard Ethernet cabling and switches to ship video from multiple cameras at an event to the production and editing suite. But there’s plenty of equipment already in the field that uses the older broadcast video network standards. Two new products developed by Xilinx Premier Alliance Member CoreEL in conjunction with BBC R&D can adapt existing broadcast equipment to Ethernet networks specifically for venues such as small- and medium-scale sporting events and multi-location live events (like elections).

I haven't the faintest idea. I only use DV, HDV and XDCAM-EX/HD and have never tried it with any (RED) 4K material. I assume it should be sufficient to handle that. But let's be honest, when I increased my raid array from 10 to 12 disks, I did not notice ANY performance gains. The limiting factor must be the PCI-e bus or the Areca controller, that just does not show any improvements from adding a couple of disks. Another thing to consider is that the various benchmark programs widely in use show quite different results.
As an example, here are two images from HD Tune Pro, one for my 2 disk raid0 on the Marvell chip and the other from my 12 disk raid30 array. First of all, HD Tune shows the wrong size, it is not 2199 GB but should be 10000 GB (at least that is what Areca claims as shown in the last picture), second it ONLY performs at around 745 MB/s transfer rate.
The most noteworthy item to look at is the rapid performance degradation of this raid0 when the disks get fuller. An average transfer rate of 165 MB/s is quite acceptable for a 2 disk setup, but seeing it go down to below 100 MB/s when the disks fill up is bothersome. It will not allow you to handle uncompressed HD at all.

REM product costing

Hi,
Would you help me out in product costing of REM scenario where HALB is given for subcontracting.Here I want to know in standard cost estimation how the cost of each activity type is incurred.
Regds,
sats.

Dear Dilip,
Whether its Discrete or REM scenario,for Semi-finished products(Sub-contracted) generally BOM is maintained along with the BOM
components and along with the Source List & Info record for sub-contracting process.
So while doing the Cost rollup for the Finished product , the standard cost for the HALB is automatically calculated.
So the price of that sub-contracted product = Raw materials cost (as per the planned price given in costing 2 view) + sub-contracting
charges (activity cost for doing the activity).
The cost calculation is done using CK40N or using CK11N+CK24.
Revert back in case of any more queries.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Product Costing - Standard Cost Component Split on Multi Level BOM's

Hi,
We are the process of introducing SAP for all back office and manufacturing activities.
I am currently trying to verify that the product cost calculation for Multi-Level BOMs in our Legacy system matches the cost roll up or cost estimate in SAP at not only a Total Cost Level but the cost component split must be accurate also. So far, all the costs roll up correctly at a total cost level but I have noticed one issue:
When I run a cost estimate for a single level BOM the cost estimate will split the components accurately into Material, Labor, Fixed Overhead and Variable overhead, However, when this component is then used in the next level of manufacturing all the Labor, Fixed Overhead and Variable Overhead Cost is grouped under Material.
Q1.) Is there a SAP setting or config change that will keep the previous Labor, Fixed OH and Variable OH cost in these categories as the material is rolled up to finished product level?
Q2.) Is there a standard report / view where I can see the Finished Goods Standard Cost split by each of there rolled up Components? This would need to split the Total Material, Total Labor, Total Fixed OH and Total VO required to make the Finished Product.
Q3.) Is there a standard report / view where I can see the added value (Absorption) by component split (Labor, Fixed OH, Variable OH) for every Manufactured Part?
Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Brian

Actuall I just tried again and it did ask for me S number and I put it in and I did not have "authorization" to access
Error Message - Access denied (R/3)
What happened?
You do not have permission to access this Object
What can you do?
Please contact a consulting adminstrative
Error code: WEBSMP106-20080214172231-0015
Error details: 2491DD9-702/1A053/3162-71A9CFA5-3CB9265-2992F9
Service Name: SAPIDB
Service Server: WEBSMP106
Process-ID: 4640
Thread-ID: 6020
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Your SAP Service Marketplace Team

Difference between product costing and cost collector

Hello experts:
Can anybody tell me wich is the difference between the product costing calculation and the preliminary cost estimate for cost collector?
Thanks
Laura

Hi,
Product cost collector is a cost object which collects actual cost which are incurred in the production of materials periodically. This is normally used in product product cost by period. Whereas, product cost calculation is wider scope.
Best Regards,
Madhu

Type of product cost

Hello,
Can anyone please tell me how can I find out what kind of product cost is being used in my system. I want to know whether product cost by period, order or by sales order in my system.
Can any please suggest me.
thank you.

Dear Nivas,
you can check the configuration under Product Costing
if you are using sale order costing you can see the configuration in that path only.
other than that you can't get the configuration information.
regards
radha

Product cost by period process

Hello
Gurus,
Can anybody please explain the process of product cost by period, eventhough i searched but i did'nt get clear picture.
Please help in this because i have interview
Thanks

Dear Kavya,
1.Product cost by period is used in a REM scenario - Repetitive Manufacturing.
2.Here a product cost collector is created for the material + each production version combination.
3.All the costs(activity posting,Goods issue,goods receipt) are captured in the product cost collector of the respetive material.
4.Each product cost collector has an order number and based on this variance calcualtion and settlement can be done according
to the business scenario.
5.This type of costing can be used for a continous production like cement industry,steel manufacturing(dealing with furnace).
6.Here along with the costing part there are certain other shop floor control parameters to choose or select this scenario or a
Discrete scenario(where Production order's are used).
7.In a REM scenario confirmation will be made against a planned order or even with out any planned order.
Regards
S Mangalraj

How to define routes for freight cost calculation

Hi,
in our company we plan to use LE-TRA Transport with Freight costs calculation. To use Transport it is a must to maintain routes in all sales orders/deliveries. Currently we do not use it and now we have the challenge to define routes and later due to freight costs calculation Stages. There are different solutions for routes. In some other companys we have only routes dependent on the Transit duration, but that's all. They don't use stages and they don't use freight cost calculation in SAP.
As I know routes should describe geographical locations (The way location A till location B). Based on the route we have a defined stage with a distance, shipping type.... That would mean for a company: They need to analyse all delivery channels with different forwarding agents and so on. Is that possible when the forwarding agent is responsible for scheduling? That means for a company with customer around the world thousands of routes?
Alternatively it is possible to create stages in the transport documents. Is that more recommendable? It would be nice, when someone could post his experience with that topic.
Thank you,
Raphael

Hi Luis,
thank you for the response. My problem is not the technical view. I know how to create the routes and what kind of information I need. The problem is to unterstand how this concept can operate in practise in a company with many different customer.
The following site describes the concept of routes in SAP:
http://blog.tkreddy.com/2010/09/17/understanding-the-concept-of-routes-le-shp-in-sap-ecc-6-0/
A company with many delivery plants and customer around the world needs to forward all delivery channels they have to us, A route describes an area and includes stages with location A and B. The stages are assigned to a forwarding agend. Based on that information I can start a freigt cost calculation. The structure of stages and routes also depends on the situation how many different forwarding agents are involved in a delivery process.
In my opinion it is really a big effort to find a reliable solution for the amount of routes and stages. I am thinking about to use the solution to create the stage manually in the transport document and to use the routes to describe the transit time.
Raphael

Product Cost Calculation - WIP calc. - Using Program - SAPKKA07

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for