Project Server cost calculation
Hi All,
We are using project server 2013. I have two fields 'vendor cost' and 'payment status' at task level. I need to sum all the vendor cost where the payment status is paid and display in a custom field at project level. How to achieve this.
Thanks in advance, Taj
Hi,
you need two additional fields, one on task level and one on project level:
"IIf([Payment Status] = "paid", [Vendor Cost], 0)" as formula on task level with type "Cost", with setting "Rollup - Sum" for "Calculation for Summary Rows ". I called it "Paid Vendor Cost Task".
A cost field ("Paid Vendor Cost" in my sample) on project level with formula [Paid Vendor Cost Task].
It will give you the result.
Does that work?
Regards
Barbara
To increase the value of this forum, please mark the replies that helped to solve your issue as answer. If you find answers to questions from other forum participants to be helpful, please mark them as helpful. Your participation will help others to find
an appropriate solution faster. Thanks for your support!
Similar Messages
-
Windows azure and project server
Hello,
I am investigating the possibilities of hosting MS Project server on windows azure. I have questions as follows:
- Can MS project server 2010 be installed on azure
- if I have a license of MS project 2010 and on azure I install the same version can I use the same license without purchasing a new one for MS project server?
- I found this link http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/pricing/calculator/?scenario=full# for azure pricing calculations, but I do not see there sharepoint cost and project server cost. What will be approximate cost for these two platforms on azure?
Also please let me know if there is some other information that I may need regarding this hosting.
Thank you,Hi,
From my research, As Azure does support the creating of Virtual Machines there is nothing to stop you using this environment to install SQL, SharePoint and Project Server. This is a fully supported environment, All Microsoft software that is installed in
the Windows Azure Virtual Machine environment must be properly licensed. By default, Windows Azure Virtual Machines include a license for use of Windows Server in the Windows Azure environment. Certain Windows Azure Virtual Machine offerings may also include
additional Microsoft software on a per-hour or evaluation basis. Licenses for other software must be obtained separately. For information about Microsoft’s License Mobility program see
Volume Licensing. In some cases, specific versions of Microsoft server software are required for support. These versions are noted in following article.
# http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2721672/en-us
Details:
Microsoft Project Server
Microsoft Project Server 2013 and later versions are supported.
Microsoft SharePoint Server
Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010 and later versions are supported on Windows Azure Virtual Machines.
Microsoft doesn't look inside your VMs, from my experience, if you have the licensed, you will not be charged for Microsoft Project Server. Hope it helps.
Best Regards
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey. -
Using multiple resource cost rates in Project Server 2013
Greetings,
We use Project Server 2013 to manage resources that often perform multiple roles within projects and also have different rates between projects. The Standard Rate from the user's profile is somewhat helpful but, as we all know, it carries over to every
project that the resource is part of.
I have tried opening Project Professional 2013 and using the additional Cost tabs in the user's information to enter different rates in tabs, B, C, D and E (tab A is the default Standard Rate from Project Server).
My experience has been that as soon as I close and check in the project file, this data disappears. Next time I open the file the default rate is available but tabs B-E are blank. This behavior does not occur if I open a stand-alone project
file not connected to Project Server.
I realize that Project is not meant to be a financial management tool and has its limitations but I'm looking for suggestions and would appreciate any feedback.
Thanks
RayDale is right in that an Enterprise Resource can only have its rates (or any details) set by the administrator. Unfortunately you are limited to 5 rates (A-E).
I have done a macro for a client that reads rates for a resource for a project from a database (or Excel) every time the project is opened. So you see the correct rates and calculated costs.
These rates get over-written next time you open the project, hence the need for the macro to update rates every time the project is opened.
Another option in the macro is to zero the rates so a copy can be emailed to clients etc without sensitive rates data.
Rod Gill
Author of the one and only Project VBA Book
www.project-systems.co.nz -
Cost Approval workflow in Project Server (PWA) 2013
Dear All,
Is there any automation through which we can build some kind of Approval stages in PWA 2013 (Project Server) so that if any Manager wants to get approval on PO(Purchase Order) or some kind of approval related to Cost then it should flow in PWA?Hi,
Just to clarify, are you looking to create a project in PWA once a PO has been approved? If that's the case you can use the 'Create Projects' option available in Project Server 2013. Also you can create the projects through the SharePoint workflows
Details can be found here:
http://blogs.office.com/2012/11/05/demand-management-and-ideation-in-microsoft-project-online/
http://pmarinescu.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/ideas-and-project-server-2013/
Hope this helps
Paul -
Hi All,
We are using project server 2013, we are not tracking resource (work/material) cost. But at each milestone a fixed amount need to be paid to the vendor based on the payment terms. What is the best way to track the amount paid and the balance.
Thanks in advance, TajHi Guillaume,
Thanks for your response, there are 50 active projects are there and each project will have around five
milestones and each milestone different vendor will be involved. In this case how to add as cost resource and track it. Also we are feeling the cost tracked through schedule will be visible to other users. Is there is nay workaround to track the cost e.g.
using custom field in PDPs.
Thanks in advance, Taj -
Task custom field and formula custom field don't correspond Project Server 2013
Hi people, I have an interesting case in Project Server 2013 SP1 CU Apr:
I have a custom task number field called AM. This field get's filled by a PSI action with actual material costs from an external system.
I also have a custom task cost formula field that is called AM*. This field is a formula field that has the formula [AM]. And summary tasks use the formula field as well.
As soon as I create a project, assign costs in the external system and let PSI fill the values within AM I get correct values in AM. But nothing is calculated on AM*. If I edit the project in the browser and publish, check in and revisit the project
AM* still isn't filled.
If I open the project in MS Project Pro the calculation comes through nicely, however I do not want to use MS project Pro to see correct data in browser.
Some tests I have already done:
I have noticed that when I create a new calculated task field AM2*, this get's calculated correctly on the already existing task.
I have also noticed that opening the custom field in server settings and just saving the field creates correct values on AM*.
What is going on? I don't want to save the custom formula field every day... There are 11 custom formula fields in the environment at the moment.Hi Gary,
Thank you for the quick response. Please note that the fieldnames are [AM] and [AM*]. There is a difference in field name due to the astrix. However I did think about the situation and changing one of the field names all together didn't do anything for the
situation at hand.
It looks like some kind of refresh thing, because without changing anything in the custom field just saving the field in server settings will turn op good values. However, values already turned up good in Project Professional 2013. And that suggest
that there is a calculation error on the PWA side wouldn't you say?
Anyway, thank you for taking time to look into this matter.
Erik -
Setting Up Earned Value Reporting in Project Server 2010, Using Hours Not Dollars
Hello All,
Are there instructions for setting up Project Server 2010 for Earned Value data capture and reporting? I'm not certain that we are capturing the correct data to report EVM (i.e., Physical % Complete), and I was unable to find any videos on YouTube.
Also, I noticed that Project Server 2010 defaults to reporting EV in Dollars. Can we set it up to report in Hours instead?
JulieHi Julie,
If you allow to jump in to complement Dale's excellent reply and comment some of your concern...
5. The status date is a fundamental parameter while talking about the EVM (it is ANYWAY a key setting for tracking projects with MS Project). The EV field will take into account actuals up to this date. Meaning that if your project plans have been updated
by the PM on tuesday and you are running the analysis on friday, you set the status date to tuesday and the uncomplete work between tuesday and friday will not be considered as late work since you are running the analysis as of tuesday. The status date can
be set from the "project" tab either in the project information dialog box or directly in the project tab, status group.
6. MS Project proposes 3 EVM tables by default. A table is a predefined set of column which composes a view, together with a Gantt chart or a timephased grid. If you go to the view tab, click on "tables" then "more tables",
you will find EV, EV cost indicators and EV Schedule indicators tables which will display the out of the box EVM fields calculated by MS Project based on the costs, actuals, Baseline, status date.
Then about the cumulative data, you might be refering to S-curves which are a representation allowing you showing the cumulative values of the EV. To do that, you'll have severals ways:
Use the cumulative calculated field in the visuals reports
Create
Dashboards from the report tab using the cumulative data (actual, Baseline, cost)
Create
MDX mesures in the OLAP cubes for cumulative data and create excel reports
Develop custom SSRS reports
Buy a 3rd-party addon
Finally please let me give you an excellent reference for the EVM in MS Project with EPM Central blog articles:
http://www.epmcentral.com/msproject/evintro.php
http://www.epmcentral.com/msproject/evprereq.php
http://www.epmcentral.com/msproject/evterms.php
http://www.epmcentral.com/msproject/evexplain.php
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, P-Seller | -
Project Server 2010 Webpart for Project Detail Pages
Hello,
I do have a requirement where I need to develop a Project Server Web Part to show some calculated project information based on some business rule from Reporting database.
That webpart I have to add in Project Detail Pages to show calculated project information for the Project I have selected/clicked from Project Center.
So please tell me how can I link my webpart with ProjUID in URL like "PWA/Project%20Detail%20Pages/ProposalStageStatus.aspx?ProjUid=2b24d36b-7796-4789-ada3-d895d218fc14"
So that it shows data corresponding to opened project in Project Server.
Thanks and let me know in case have any doubts in understanding the requirement.Hi YLee_1980,
If I understand your requirement correctly then you can use ProjUID querystring paramater to get specific ProjectUID like below
HttpContext.Current.Request.QueryString["ProjUid"];
Then after getting ProjectUID you can use it anywhere in your SQL query, PSI method calling etc etc.
Also you can look into PS 2010 Solution Starter
custom solutions Kit to enhance your knowledge on PS 2010 development. That would a great starting point.
Thanks much hope this will help
Sachin Vashishth MCTS -
Project Server 2010 - Active Directory Enterprise Resource Pool Synchronization limitations
Greetings again.
I have a quick question about the limitations of Active Directory Enterprise Resource Pool Synchronization. Specifically, what has your experience
been with extremely large numbers of users (10k plus). Is anyone aware of a
practical limit of users in your AD group you would recommend when using the
Schedule Synchronization feature on a nightly or weekly basis?
There is a caveat to this question however. The client has decided (perhaps for some misinformed reasons) to allow access for every user, to every
project site, within their PWA environment. They’ve selected the View Project Site option within the
Categories for the Team Members PWA Group for which 90% of their intended users reside. So when we ran a couple test syncs in DEV with a smaller AD group of about 8,000 users, the sync understandably
lasted upwards of 18 hours. Obviously unacceptable for a PROD environment on a nightly basis and not necessarily ideal for a weekly sync either.
Experience in addition to documents like these, “Best
practices for managing a large number of resources in Project Server 2010” tell me that we are way over the practical limit of a scheduled resource pool synchronization...IF
the client really desires that all users access all their sites. But before I submit my recommendations, I wanted to check with the community just in case others may have found a way to synchronize large numbers of users (10k plus) on a nightly or weekly
basis, within a reasonable time frame AND allowed all users to access all sites within PWA.
What do you think?
As always, thanks for your help.
Chris Addis - MCTSHello Hrishi.
My delayed response has been due to a large amount of testing we have been performing on this particular topic. Here is an update, please feel free to provide feedback.
We went back to testing and spent more time reviewing the documents:
Best practices for managing a large number of resources in Project Server 2010 and
SharePoint Server 2010 capacity management: Software boundaries and limits. Our team interpreted those documents as saying, 1,000 security
scopes per site is a recommended limit. It does not say it’s a hard limit, just a recommended limit. “When the recommended unique security scope boundaries are exceeded, performance issue can occur.”
So we decided to perform some tests (31 in total) to try and get a gage of what we are seeing.
We needed to establish a baseline first. So we performed a series of 23 Active Directory Resource Pool Synchronizations with various settings in a clean, Out of the Box, environment in order to see some consistent numbers. Here is it’s summary:
Our AD group of 8,000 users took about 32 minutes, on average, every time to sync. The difference between the first sync and last sync differed only by 1-3 minutes.
Adding 40 project sites increased the average sync time from 32 to 120 minutes.
Adding 100 users to each of those 40 project sites, did not increase the sync times.
One setting (identified at this time) reduced the synchronization time. It was the
Project Site Permissions check box found within the Project Web App > Server Settings > Project Site Provisioning Settings area. By deselecting this check box we reduced or synchronization time back to the 32 minute
average.
The View Project Site check box within the Project Web App > Server Settings > Manage Groups > Team Members group had no apparent effect on the sync times besides what we had gleaned from the Microsoft documentation.
Naturally, this left us with a problem. As I’m sure you know, by deselecting the check box (Project Site Permissions), our project sites are now (figuratively speaking) orphans with no connection to the parent site. This generates
a new set of issues. For example:
Newly created project sites cannot be accessed by the owner and team members. They will require someone like the farm admin to come in behind them and add the intended users to the project site along with their required permissions.
All current and futures sites will no longer have users added via the standard method of building a team and publishing the project, but will have to be added manually.
You can use the Synchronize option found within Project Web App > Server Settings > Project Sites page, but that kinda defeats the purpose. It would require constant updating on a per site basis to keep up with
PM changes. Not very sensible, but it does work.
With this baseline information, we moved our tests into our DEV environment which somewhat mimics our PROD environment. This environment has 352 project sites and we performed 8 tests. This is where we had some large sync time numbers.
Here is the DEV test summary:
With the Project Site Permissions check box cleared, our AD group of 8,000 users took on average 30 minutes to sync. This was in line with our baseline times. With the exception of one test sync that took 99 minutes to complete.
That anomaly is acquiescent with what I’ve seen over the years. Sometimes syncs do some unusual things.
With the Project Site Permissions check box selected, our AD group of 8,000 users took on average 690 minutes (11.5 hours) to sync. Unacceptable of course.
So here’s what we’ve learned when dealing with extremely large numbers of active directory users in your Resource Pool sync:
We did not see a decrease in subsequent sync times after the initial Active Directory Resource Pool Synchronization as some might expect.
Our attempt to decrease sync time via the option of removing the View Project Sites was not successful. (Unless we interpreted Microsoft's document incorrectly.)
However, our interpretation of the recommended software boundaries and limits of SharePoint Server 2010 as it pertains to security scopes per site at 1,000, appears to be correct.
Using the option of clearing the Project Site Permissions does produce a reduction in AD sync time, but at a cost segregating your project sites and thus the creation of new processes of maintaining them.
I’ll remind others that these results are particular to our environments, there may still be exceptions yet to discover. Others may see numbers contrary to ours.
The biggest surprise to some members on our team (myself excluded) was that we did not see a reduced sync time after any of our initial syncs. Some are under the impression that after your initial sync, you should see reduced sync times. I haven’t
found that to be the absolute case in all situations, just in some situations. The reason for this still eludes me. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
I’ll let this sit a bit longer, but if no one disagrees with the results, I think we have our answer:
The number of project sites directly affects your Active Directory Resource Pool Synchronizations if you are using the
Project Site Permissions option. If you plan on synchronizing over 1,000 users
and you have a large number of project sites, proceed with the knowledge that you may have performance issues and long sync times.
As always, I’d love to hear from you or others just in case I’m missing something.
Chris Addis - MCTS -
Project Server 2010 - Error Adding/Modifying Users
Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. We are running Project Server 2010 with SharePoint 2010 on Windows Server 2008. Project Server was installed successfully and a new site was created (server.com/pwa). When I attempt to add a new user (via Server
Settings), or modify the existing account that was added on install, I receive an error on the top of the page. For a new user the following appears:
0de01bb7-786e-4003-8fe8-6790fae42248 -1 2 false true 3 0 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 false false 0de01bb7-786e-4003-8fe8-6790fae42248 true false
Once the new user info is entered, and I click "Save", the progress icon spins and nothing happens. No user is added.
When I go to modify the existing user, I see this on the top of the page:
•An error was encountered in loading the page. Refresh the page, or contact your server administrator if this problem persists.
7342ea55-fad1-4a8b-9d7b-1450e468cd2f 1 2 false true 3 0 Admin. SP A DOMAIN\account true 2014-06-30T15:28:55.12-05:00 7342ea55-fad1-4a8b-9d7b-1450e468cd2f 7342ea55-fad1-4a8b-9d7b-1450e468cd2f false false 2014-06-30T10:34:09.95-05:00 2014-06-30T10:34:46.56-05:00
2 2 10000.000000 false b6635b2e-e747-4771-a78b-24f7509629d0 7342ea55-fad1-4a8b-9d7b-1450e468cd2f DOMAIN\account true false Admin. SP 2 2014-07-01T08:07:42.343-05:00 7342ea55-fad1-4a8b-9d7b-1450e468cd2f 100
Any ideas on how I can resolve this issue would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks again!
AJMuch appreciated kbwrecker. Moving forward, I am developing a plan to deploy SharePoint/Project Server 2013. So this will hopefully, if done right, alleviate these types of issues.
But, as the 2010 system will be in use for awhile, I am still curious as to what is causing my current PWA issues. I also believe it is a permission issue. The errors I added to my first post on this topic were not from the logs. They only
appear on the user/group webpage in PWA. I don't see them elsewhere.
Here are the complete ULS logs (using ULS Viewer) from my PWA add user attempt. This is very long. I apologize if this is more than is needed:
07/10/2014 08:14:43.19 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x1E34 SharePoint Foundation Logging Correlation Data xmnv Medium Name=Request
(GET:https://sharepoint.company.com:443/pwa/_layouts/pwa/Admin/ManageUsers.aspx) 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.22 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x1E34 SharePoint Foundation Logging Correlation Data xmnv Medium Site=/pwa
9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.23 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x1E34 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress:
'http://spserver:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/PWA.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Interfaces.IPWA' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/PWA/SecurityCheckUserPagePermission' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:ea31a728-db44-4c90-9284-2b991597998d'
9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.24 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/PWA.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/PWA/SecurityCheckUserPagePermission' MessageId:
'urn:uuid:ea31a728-db44-4c90-9284-2b991597998d' 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.24 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.24 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=1.77368911411925 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.28 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x1E34 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress:
'http://spserver:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/PWA.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Interfaces.IPWA' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/PWA/ResourceReadResourceCount' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:42f18fb5-adcf-4847-9883-5f8e8bd0c2b5'
9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.28 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/PWA.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/PWA/ResourceReadResourceCount' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:42f18fb5-adcf-4847-9883-5f8e8bd0c2b5'
9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.28 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.29 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=4.15443862278586 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.30 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x1E34 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress:
'http://spserver:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/PWA.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Interfaces.IPWA' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/PWA/ResourceReadUserListAll' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:5b83c471-7f9c-4fb6-bef1-861b2b6111fc'
9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.30 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/PWA.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/PWA/ResourceReadUserListAll' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:5b83c471-7f9c-4fb6-bef1-861b2b6111fc'
9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.30 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.31 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=3.72645126685095 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.37 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x1E34 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress:
'http://spserver:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/Security.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Interfaces.ISecurity' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/Security/CheckUserGlobalPermission' MessageId:
'urn:uuid:7787e7fe-44b3-4bb0-9a16-452ac7f8f62b' 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.38 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x0984 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/Security.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/Security/CheckUserGlobalPermission' MessageId:
'urn:uuid:7787e7fe-44b3-4bb0-9a16-452ac7f8f62b' 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.38 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x0984 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.38 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x0984 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=1.32977794663847 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.39 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x1E34 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress:
'http://spserver:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/PWA.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Interfaces.IPWA' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/PWA/ResourceReadUserSummariesAll' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:844ec823-8987-42b2-bd60-e9d33e17ba89'
9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.40 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x0984 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/PWA.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/PWA/ResourceReadUserSummariesAll' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:844ec823-8987-42b2-bd60-e9d33e17ba89'
9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.40 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x0984 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.41 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x0984 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=10.0093726996029 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:43.70 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x1E34 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (Request (GET:https://sharepoint.company.com:443/pwa/_layouts/pwa/Admin/ManageUsers.aspx)). Execution Time=510.331620359571 9e5ce790-3f37-48c3-a1a4-fff4e338d5b4
07/10/2014 08:14:44.13 w3wp.exe (0x1558) 0x15F4 Excel Services Application Excel Calculation Services 8jg2 Medium ResourceManager.PerformCleanup:
Memory Manager: CurrentSize=528744448. 53fed7f1-cb9f-3737-0000-000050f7b00c
07/10/2014 08:14:46.23 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x21E0 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (Request (GET:https://sharepoint.company.com:443/pwa/_layouts/PWA/Admin/AddModifyUser.aspx?returnLocation=0))
07/10/2014 08:14:46.23 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x21E0 SharePoint Foundation Logging Correlation Data xmnv Medium Name=Request
(GET:https://sharepoint.company.com:443/pwa/_layouts/PWA/Admin/AddModifyUser.aspx?returnLocation=0) 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.28 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x21E0 SharePoint Foundation Logging Correlation Data xmnv Medium Site=/pwa
8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.31 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x21E0 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress:
'http://spserver:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/PWA.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Interfaces.IPWA' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/PWA/SecurityCheckUserPagePermission' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:0b0c9348-49aa-40fc-b5b8-409be0fb64ab'
8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.32 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/PWA.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/PWA/SecurityCheckUserPagePermission' MessageId:
'urn:uuid:0b0c9348-49aa-40fc-b5b8-409be0fb64ab' 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.32 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.32 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=1.83626689984342 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.33 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x21E0 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress:
'http://spserver:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/Security.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Interfaces.ISecurity' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/Security/CheckUserGlobalPermission' MessageId:
'urn:uuid:610e3e65-f190-4f09-9bd7-bdedc0294f06' 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.33 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/Security.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/Security/CheckUserGlobalPermission' MessageId:
'urn:uuid:610e3e65-f190-4f09-9bd7-bdedc0294f06' 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.33 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.33 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=1.20350491473078 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.52 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x21E0 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress:
'http://spserver:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/Project.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Interfaces.IProject' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/Project/ReadServerListSeparator' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:79fd41f4-b21a-4c0e-b8ff-022a634722ea'
8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.71 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x0984 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/Project.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/Project/ReadServerListSeparator' MessageId:
'urn:uuid:79fd41f4-b21a-4c0e-b8ff-022a634722ea' 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.71 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x0984 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.71 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x0984 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=2.86349242711015 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.71 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x21E0 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly High Leaving Monitored Scope
(ExecuteWcfOperation:http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/Project/ReadServerListSeparator). Execution Time=192.754107016395 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.86 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x21E0 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress:
'http://spserver:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/Admin.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Interfaces.IAdmin' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/Admin/GetServerCurrency' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:05bc1abb-b84f-4624-a8c8-97ff5fec5128'
8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.86 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/Admin.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/Admin/GetServerCurrency' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:05bc1abb-b84f-4624-a8c8-97ff5fec5128'
8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.86 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:46.87 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=2.57434953325073 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:48.27 w3wp.exe (0x1558) 0x1A14 Excel Services Application Excel Calculation Services 8jg2 Medium ResourceManager.PerformCleanup:
Disk Manager: CurrentSize=170852. 11c5f189-cb9f-3737-0000-000050f7b00c
07/10/2014 08:14:48.58 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x0A8C SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress:
'http://spserver:32843/3134a6073a474d49a4f6c790255e5237/MetadataWebService.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.SharePoint.Taxonomy.IMetadataWebServiceApplication' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/taxonomy/soap/IDataAccessReadOnly/GetChanges' MessageId:
'urn:uuid:974be790-09cc-4c85-ba78-002750c5e866'
07/10/2014 08:14:48.58 w3wp.exe (0x1558) 0x2094 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/3134a6073a474d49a4f6c790255e5237/MetadataWebService.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/taxonomy/soap/IDataAccessReadOnly/GetChanges' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:974be790-09cc-4c85-ba78-002750c5e866'
3494407d-8a15-4988-9a00-e82b6bd1c016
07/10/2014 08:14:48.58 w3wp.exe (0x1558) 0x2094 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 3494407d-8a15-4988-9a00-e82b6bd1c016
07/10/2014 08:14:48.58 w3wp.exe (0x1558) 0x2094 SharePoint Server Taxonomy fuc5 Medium MetadataWebServiceApplication.GetChanges
called on 'Managed Metadata Service' starting. 3494407d-8a15-4988-9a00-e82b6bd1c016
07/10/2014 08:14:48.58 w3wp.exe (0x1558) 0x2094 SharePoint Server Taxonomy fuc6 Medium MetadataWebServiceApplication.GetChanges
called on 'Managed Metadata Service' completed. 3494407d-8a15-4988-9a00-e82b6bd1c016
07/10/2014 08:14:48.58 w3wp.exe (0x1558) 0x2094 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=1.98935898277574 3494407d-8a15-4988-9a00-e82b6bd1c016
07/10/2014 08:14:49.14 w3wp.exe (0x1558) 0x15F4 Excel Services Application Excel Calculation Services 8jg2 Medium ResourceManager.PerformCleanup:
Memory Manager: CurrentSize=529596416. 53fed7f1-cb9f-3737-0000-000050f7b00c
07/10/2014 08:14:49.19 w3wp.exe (0x0A64) 0x08B0 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest:
RemoteAddress: 'http://spserver:32843/3134a6073a474d49a4f6c790255e5237/MetadataWebService.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.SharePoint.Taxonomy.IMetadataWebServiceApplication' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/taxonomy/soap/IDataAccessReadOnly/GetChanges'
MessageId: 'urn:uuid:08359816-04b3-4d2c-b5ac-486aa21dbd2b'
07/10/2014 08:14:49.20 w3wp.exe (0x1558) 0x2094 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/3134a6073a474d49a4f6c790255e5237/MetadataWebService.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/taxonomy/soap/IDataAccessReadOnly/GetChanges' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:08359816-04b3-4d2c-b5ac-486aa21dbd2b'
8afd4f08-409a-4728-bdee-140f948f7ae3
07/10/2014 08:14:49.20 w3wp.exe (0x1558) 0x2094 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 8afd4f08-409a-4728-bdee-140f948f7ae3
07/10/2014 08:14:49.20 w3wp.exe (0x1558) 0x2094 SharePoint Server Taxonomy fuc5 Medium MetadataWebServiceApplication.GetChanges
called on 'Managed Metadata Service' starting. 8afd4f08-409a-4728-bdee-140f948f7ae3
07/10/2014 08:14:49.20 w3wp.exe (0x1558) 0x2094 SharePoint Server Taxonomy fuc6 Medium MetadataWebServiceApplication.GetChanges
called on 'Managed Metadata Service' completed. 8afd4f08-409a-4728-bdee-140f948f7ae3
07/10/2014 08:14:49.20 w3wp.exe (0x1558) 0x2094 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=1.07806997816762 8afd4f08-409a-4728-bdee-140f948f7ae3
07/10/2014 08:14:50.89 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x1734) 0x0580 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (Timer Job Search Health Monitoring - Trace Events) c9d438fc-b6a3-499f-9709-8566b62cb5e0
07/10/2014 08:14:50.89 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x1734) 0x0580 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (Timer Job Search Health Monitoring - Trace Events). Execution Time=4.99169587196138 c9d438fc-b6a3-499f-9709-8566b62cb5e0
07/10/2014 08:14:51.10 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x21E0 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress:
'http://spserver:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/CustomFields.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Interfaces.ICustomFields' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/CustomFields/ReadCustomFieldsByEntity'
MessageId: 'urn:uuid:4de9e73a-ad47-4bab-891e-bd52c7d1446b' 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:51.22 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x0984 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/CustomFields.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/CustomFields/ReadCustomFieldsByEntity'
MessageId: 'urn:uuid:4de9e73a-ad47-4bab-891e-bd52c7d1446b' 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:51.22 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x0984 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:51.22 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x0984 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=3.70745443904183 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:51.23 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x21E0 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly High Leaving Monitored Scope
(ExecuteWcfOperation:http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/CustomFields/ReadCustomFieldsByEntity). Execution Time=120.598847060171 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:51.32 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x21E0 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress:
'http://spserver:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/LookupTable.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Interfaces.ILookupTable' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/LookupTable/ReadLookupTablesByUids' MessageId:
'urn:uuid:b196f29b-6c62-48a4-921d-90bf91d78653' 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:51.43 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/LookupTable.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/LookupTable/ReadLookupTablesByUids' MessageId:
'urn:uuid:b196f29b-6c62-48a4-921d-90bf91d78653' 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:51.43 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:51.44 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=17.8209800407594 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:51.44 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x21E0 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly High Leaving Monitored Scope
(ExecuteWcfOperation:http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/LookupTable/ReadLookupTablesByUids). Execution Time=128.768041748323 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:51.60 w3wp.exe (0x16A4) 0x21E0 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress:
'http://spserver:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/Calendar.svc' Channel: 'Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Interfaces.ICalendar' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/Calendar/ListCalendars' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:4f766fee-c7d6-4a41-9a4a-cfd785f9fd81'
8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:51.70 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Topology e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress:
'http://spserver.company.com:32843/ca7243dbfa1e40e189c28ca8f4e1dbad/PSI/Calendar.svc' Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/project/server/webservices/Calendar/ListCalendars' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:4f766fee-c7d6-4a41-9a4a-cfd785f9fd81'
8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:51.70 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored
scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation) 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26
07/10/2014 08:14:51.70 w3wp.exe (0x1830) 0x18F8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored
Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=3.05206387962716 8ddb50f2-6ae7-4a68-a2a4-6bbddb67ac26 -
Project Actual Cost Line Items (CJI3) - Need Invement Profile Key also
Hi All,
We are trying to execute the report "Project Actual Cost Line Items" through Transaction Code CJI3.
We need Invement Profile Key also in the out report of CJI3.
Is there any Standard SAP report to get Invement Profile Key as well along with normal CJI3 output.
Please let me know in case you find any such Standard SAP report.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
SrinivasHello Sreekanth
Thanks for your input. Yes it is working now after posting cost under same CE as what I have maintained in Base of costing sheet on required WBS..
I was under impression that the cost lying in cost center can be pulled out indepedantly on WBS through costing sheet based upon percentage mentioned in overhead.However I am observing now that the cost posted on WBS is taken as base amount to calculate overhead.
In my case, Eur 100 cost is posted under primary cost element 652100 on WBS and Eur 2000 cost is posted on Cost center under same Cost element Actually I am required to pull out some percentage of cost Eur2000 on cost center to WBS. However,
currently it is taking Rs 100 (posted on WBS) as basline cost and calculating overhead over it and posting it to WBS again under overhead cost element.
Can we handle this through costing sheet or for that Assessment distribution is must? May I expect the answer.
Best Regards
Adwait -
Hi
Is it possible to create a formula that converts a resource available hours into full time equivalent units in project server 2010? Say a resource has 160 available hours for any given month this will translate into 1 FTE for this month. If it is 80 hours
for that month then it will be 0.5 FTE and so on and so forth.
Thanks,
-MaurizioMaurizio,
It's a bit late, but there are two OLAP cubes that can provide you with this information in a pivot table in Project Server 2010.
"MSP_Portfolio_Analyzer" and "Resource Timephased" contains capacity measures that be used to provide calculated measures when the cube database is generated. You change OLAP cube configuration in "Server Settings -> Database Administration -> OLAP
Database Management". In either of the aforementioned cubes, use "Calculated Measures" to create two measures:
Member Name
MDX Expression
Available (FTE)
([capacity]-[work])/[capacity]
Work (FTE)
[Work]/[Capacity]
These two fields will appear in the pivot table field list as "Values", and when combined with a "Time" column, can give you a picture of FTE usage and availability.
I prefer the portfolio version since it contains project/assignment data and resource data, letting you see just how resources are being utilized.
One thing I have not been able to get around is getting ""Maximum Units" for a resource factored into the measure. A common practice is to allocate more that "100%" to generic resources to represent teams for planning purposes. The OLAP measures will show
only 0.0 to 1.0 FTE for any resource, even if a resource represents more than one body.
If you have an SSRS query you could share, I would appreciated it!
Hope this helps!
JTC
JAckson T. Cole, PMP, MCITP -
Project Server 2013 for Resource Planning & Project Portfolio Management
We are looking to use project server 2013 for resource and project portfolio management. We are an IT department of approximately 600 growing to 1,000 within the next several years.
We would like to us PS2013 to do the following :
Manage Portfolio of Projects
Manage Resources against this Portfolio
Calculate Project Finances using resource roles and rates
I would be grateful to have both comments on experience , both positive and negative.
Thank YouMany teams within organizations are turning to Project Server to help them control resources, deliverables and costs better. It does resource management very well with work & cost resources, baseline costs, material costs, budget costs and
out of the box earned value analysis (EV). The Strategy (portfolio) component is very powerful and it will help you identify project that align to your objects then do what if analysis to find the right mix of projects.
Here are a couple of things you should think about when moving to PS2013:
1) Who will be using the tool? If it is a mix of onsite staff, remote staff, vendors, contractors etc. you may want to think about a hosted solution.
2) Training. Don't assume everyone will just magically 'know' how to use the tool. Train everyone (team members, PMs, Executives) then train them again. It's the only way to truly get the value out of the tool.
3) Who will manage the system? This is not a typical application. The right administrator needs SharePoint, Project Server, SQL Server, MS Project, Analysis Services and SQL Report writing skills. Please note that much of this can
be learned by the right person but DEFINITELY find the right person.
4) Don't start customizing right out of the box. You will get frustrated. Adjust your organization to the tool early on. I know that is easier said than done but you need a realistic approach to get tool acceptance moving early.
5) Use workflows but don't use them right out of the gate. Workflows are great but I suggest you wait until phase 2 or 3 to start aligning them to your business processes.
6) Lastly and most importantly, you must first establish your own business processes THEN align them to the tool. DO NOT assume the tool will create business process for you. You must think about how you are going to initiate a project,
how are you going to track deliverables, how will time sheets be managed, etc. Get to a whiteboard, crack open Visio and start building and establishing your processes now. PS 2013 is pretty flexible and usually will align well with existing business
processes.
And don't forget to hire a good consultant. They can be brought in during key phases of your roll-out to add value, help you avoid risks, and provide you with best practice advice.
Good luck. -
We have recently gone live on a Timesheeting system based on Project Server 2007.
I now want to know how the system could be improved using 2010 or 2013.
But first you would need to know our requirements and what we did in 2007 ...
We needed the GUI of My Timesheets and the Admin tasks but approvals based on what project/task it was. Ie PM approval not line management approval.
We managed it by entering timesheets in My Timesheets, importing to My Tasks and then regularly picking up published Task Updates in the Table EPMAssignmentByDay and capturing them in an added table in the Reporting database. We had a few key requirements
which required some customisation:
Need to capture the timestamp of when approved. to nearest hour. plus approver ID (ie status manager) and the cost centre at that time of the resource (they can move sometimes)
Need to be able to freeze approved records - so that after that point they can't be changed. And financial reports can run and know the data won't change.
2 - is a headache for us. There is no mechanism to stop a user from trying to update frozen records. We currently have to just ignore the updates
We also wanted expenses - but that wasn't possible in 2007.
The new "Single Entry" mode looks like it will make life easier for the users.
But:
Is there any concept of timestamping the approvals?
Is there any concept of freezing the approved data?
The new Timesheet user-defined fields. Could these be used to add an expense amount and comment?
I now know my way around the 2007 Reporting Database (at least parts of it) - but haven't found documentation to tell me what changed at the level need to answer the questions above.
Thank you
MikeCro
MikeCroOne of my colleagues pointed me to the MSFT paper "Managing timesheets in Microsoft Office Project Server 2007"
It tells me that there is a field called "Processed" in the timesheet tables in 2007.
It also says "This block is designed to indicate when a timesheet has been transferred to a third-party system.
Customers may also use this field to block the timesheet from being recalled." - which feels like MSFT are trying to give the hooks I need. This could enable me to close off changes - at least at timesheet level if not timesheet line level.
But which field is it in which database table?
I also notice that there is a tantalising comment for one value of the enumeration TimesheetEnum.Status in EPM 2013:
PendingSubmit: Value=5. Pending submission; used when one or more timesheet lines are pending approval after a timesheet is submitted and project manager coordination is required.
This sounds very like it would support what we want: each of the lines in a timesheet week to be approved by the different approvers and then lock the timesheet. (Even better would be to lock a row after PM has approved and a weekly processing
day reached)
Can anyone point me to this level of detail of what is in project Server 2013. or is this in 2010 as well.
MikeCro
MikeCro -
Updating custom fields in project server 2010/2013 using psi
Hi,
I have two custom fields . Lets call them A and B.
A has some content. Now i want B to have the same content as A . B is a formula custom field wher b=[A] .
now b is empty data and A has data.
how do i get column in B be populated.
i tried manual publish. IT worked but i have several projects.so iam looking for a script to do bulk publish so that data in B can be populated with data in A
a) i checked out project (CheckOutProject)
b) published project (QueuePublish())
c) checked in project (QueueCheckInProject())
however i donot get the value of A reflected in B using. Am i doing something wrong?
Pls help.Any pointers towards a script would behighly appreciated.
i am using project server 2010
Thanks
SuHello,
You probably want to use Project Pro to do the publish so the calculation happens and updates field B. For bulk publish using project pro use VBA to automate project pro to open each project then do save and publish etc.
Paul
Paul Mather | Twitter |
http://pwmather.wordpress.com | CPS |
MVP | Downloads
Maybe you are looking for
-
ADF Table with check box on each row - First time selection gets unchecked
Hi, The ADF Table has a check box in each, whenever a select box is clicked for the first time , it gets unselected automatically. Also if I select a row / click on a row and then select the check box, it is properly getting selected. I see there
-
Convert USB 3.0 to USB 2.0? Why?
Sounds useless, since most USB 3.0 devices are backward compatible. But apparently there's enough slop in the spec so that at least my 3.0 HD won't work with my Netgear WNDR4000 N700 router's USB 2.0 port, and I can't mount it as a network drive on
-
Extracting body with header and trailer multiple times from a multirow file
Hello Everyone, I am new to OSB and currently working on a project where I need to extract data from a flat file containing multiple rows of body and a single header and trailer in the following fashion: Original File: <Header></Header> <Details></De
-
Using a specific network interface
Hello, I would like to know how I can force Mac OS X to use a specific network interface while connecting to my mac mini (from the iMac): I'm connected to the internet (I mean the local network) using the airport, and I connected my iMac with the mac
-
Why Do I continue to get poor customer Services
Complaint On 9-26-2014, I contacted Verizon wireless to get information on how to return my I-Phone 5. I was given an early upgrade and was told by the representative to return the I-phone to Verizon when I received my new phone. When I called Verizo