Property configuration for ccBPM incoming message size ?

Hi,
I got problem using ccBPM in PI 7.0 EHP2. If the total of incoming records is less than 2000 line then the ccBPM able to process the message. But then if the incoming message more than 2000 always stuck at the ccbPM inbound queue and not able to continue unti i can delete the queue.
is that any way to configure this ?
Thank you and Regards
Fernannd

Hi Madhu,
Actually, the total record that i have tested was 8000 (Header and detail). I have checked also the payload size is around 3.5 MB (i don't think that so big).
I will continue to investigate what is the root cause because the bpm working fine if i am set the sender communication channel to split the message for every 500 record.
Thank You and Regards
Fernand

Similar Messages

Aftet the closing all tabs of site "vkontakte.ru" still remains sound of alert for new incoming messages. Helps get rid of this only reopening browser.

Aftet the closing all tabs of site "vkontakte.ru" still remains sound of alert for new incoming messages. Helps get rid of this only reopening browser.

Problem was founded: plugin "Speed dial" was autoupdating this page when open new tabs with him

Incoming message size exceeds the configured maximum size for protocol t3

Hi All,
I've encountered an error as follow:
weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException: Incoming message of size 50004000 bytes exceeds the configured maximum of 50000000 bytes of protocol t3.
But the request message is only 3MB, why it is enlarged to over 50M?
There is a For Each loop section in main flow, is it because for one loop, there will be a copy of request message?
How to enlarge message size for protocol t3?
Go to server/protocol and change 'Maximum Message Size' for AdminServer, OSB Servers and SOA servers?
Thanks and Regards,
Bruce

Hi,
1) After setting -Dweblogic.MaxMessageSize to 25000000
<BEA-000403> <IOException occurred on socket: Socket[addr=ac-sync-webserver1/172.24.128.8,port=9040,localport=36285]
weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException: Incoming message of size: '25002240' bytes exceeds the configured maximum of: '25000000' bytes for protocol: 't3'
at weblogic.socket.BaseAbstractMuxableSocket.incrementBufferOffset(BaseAbstractMuxableSocket.java:174)
2) After setting -Dweblogic.MaxMessageSize to 50000000
<BEA-000403> <IOException occurred on socket: Socket[addr=ac-sync-webserver2/172.24.128.9,port=9040,localport=59925]
weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException: Incoming message of size: '50000400' bytes exceeds the configured maximum of: '50000000' bytes for protocol:
't3'.
And even after setting various values for -Dweblogic.MaxMessageSize , issue weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException was observed.
To overcome the issue set Manual Service Migration Only as after several experiments and replicating the issue it was found out that in case of no available pinned services, must set the migration policies of the migratable targets on "Manual Service Migration Only".
And once it is corrected; it was noticed that weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException issue also resolved.
WebLogic Server can fail over most services transparently, but it's unable to do the same when dealing with pinned services.
Pinned Services : JMS and JTA are considered as pinned services. They're hosted on individual members of a cluster and not on all server instances.
You can have high availability only if the cluster can ensure that these pinned services are always running somewhere in the cluster.
When a WebLogic Server instance hosting these critical pinned services fails, WebLogic Server can't support their continuous availability and uses migration instead of failover to ensure that they are always available.
Regards,
Kal

"No CEN system configured for CCMS monitoring" message

Hello,
When I want to use the reports option on central mode I receive this message:
"No CEN system configured for CCMS monitoring"
Can someone please guide me through this configuration?
Thank you in advance,
Roy

Hi Roy,
Monitoring Setup Guide will tell you how to setup CEN
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/43f30e51-0a01-0010-f59a-fecea2b95b2c
Regards
Juan
Please reward with points if helpful

ABAP stack configuration for content based message search in PI 7.

Hi experts,
I am trying to eanble Content based message search in PI7.11 SP10.
My requirement is to Filter message in PI moni based on a particular DeviceID field in the paylaod.I have set filters in SXMS_LMS_CONF.
But upon testing the extractor, the messages are extarcted based on the interface mentioned in the filter criteria, and not the particluar field of the message.
I have referred a few bolgs on this topic , but could not find a relevant solution to my issue. Am i missing any configurations in this? Or is his not possible without TREX.
Could anyone suggest a solution for this.
Thanks.

Filter
Extractor:
XPath: nm:XXXXXCreateRequest/MeterReadingDocument/UtiltiesMeasurementTask/UtiltiesDevice/UtilitiesDeviceID

Extending maximum message size

I want to extend the maximum message size for a standalone client which is implemented according to the documentation. The server (9.1) is already configured for an extended message size of 20000000 via web console (environment - server - protocols - general). But I get the "weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException: Incoming message of size: '10000080' bytes exceeds the configured maximum of: '10000000' bytes for protocol: 't3'" independently whether I give the parameter "-Dweblogic.MaxMessageSize=20000000" (or MaxT3MessageSize) to the clients jvm or not. How can I increase the message size?

It doesn't seem to throw an error message - at least not in the logs that I have searched through -but rather simply rejects the message. Everything works properly if the message is trimmed to fit the 64K limit.
The message recieved by the java application:
javax.jms.JMSException: JMSRemoteServer[server1:3701]: remote server is closed
at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSUtils.toJMSException(JMSUtils.java:1853)
at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSRemoteServer.assertOpen(JMSRemoteServer.java:691)
at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSRemoteServer.assertOk(JMSRemoteServer.java:700)
at com.evermind.server.jms.JMSRemoteServer.enqMessage(JMSRemoteServer.java:614)
at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindSession.send(EvermindSession.java:1098)
at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindMessageProducer.send(EvermindMessageProducer.java:409)
at com.evermind.server.jms.EvermindMessageProducer.send(EvermindMessageProducer.java:201)

WLS7 JMS Max Message Size

          I have done a search and found many questions on Max Message size, but I didnt
          find any relating specifically to WLS7.
          Q1: Is there a JMS Message Size limit the same as the T3 Max Message size?
          Q2: Does the WLS JMS implementation "chunk" large JMS messages into multiple T3
          messages?
          Cheers,
          Nick


Hi Nick,
          The performance is hard to predict. It is highly dependent on message
          type, application overhead, persistence, store type, CPU and network
          speed, etc., so you will need to measure it yourself. I think you will
          find that once message size exceeds 100K, perhaps less, perhaps more,
          JMS throughput is directly proportional to message size. (eg. it takes
          the same amount of time to send 10 100K messages as it does to send 1
          1MB message.)
          I understand what your "chunking" question were about now. You may
          find it useful to know that since its earliest releases, WebLogic
          outbound requests from one JVM to another are "single threaded" from a
          layered application's point of view: outbound traffic from one
          application must wait until previous requests posted by other apps are sent.
          Tom, BEA
          Nick Minutello wrote:
          > Thanks Tom, for the answers.
          >
          > My questions, I guess, are getting to the bottom of whether I can send huge messages
          > over WLS JMS - in the region of 10's of megabytes.
          >
          > Naturally, I can always send smaller messages - but there are occasions where
          > I have very large messages (files, in fact) and I prefer to have all processing
          > on the server side rather than the JMS client side.
          >
          > What are your thoughts?
          >
          > -Nick
          >
          >
          > Tom Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
          >
          >>Hi Nick,
          >>
          >>Nick Minutello wrote:
          >>
          >>>I have done a search and found many questions on Max Message size,
          >>
          >>but I didnt
          >>
          >>>find any relating specifically to WLS7.
          >>>
          >>>Q1: Is there a JMS Message Size limit the same as the T3 Max Message
          >>
          >>size?
          >>
          >>Up to 7.0 there is no configurable for JMS max message size. In 8.1
          >>
          >>(public beta soon) it can be configured on the JMS server and/or on the
          >>
          >>JMS destination. In either case, the T3 max message size is a limiting
          >>
          >>factor.
          >>
          >>One thing to be aware of is that WL JMS aggregates asynchronous messages
          >>
          >>when pushing from server to asynchronous consumers - producing larger
          >>T3
          >>messages which can hit the T3 max limit. The number of messages that
          >>
          >>get aggregated is configurable on the WL connection factory
          >>(MessagesMaximum).
          >>
          >>
          >>>Q2: Does the WLS JMS implementation "chunk" large JMS messages into
          >>
          >>multiple T3
          >>
          >>>messages?
          >>
          >>Yes and No. (WebLogic "chunks" internally at the T3 layer, not the JMS
          >>
          >>layer.)
          >>
          >>
          >>>Cheers,
          >>>Nick
          >>
          >>Tom, BEA
          >>
          >
          >

Why is my iPhone replying a blank email to every incoming message?

Firstly, I've tried setting up my Gmail account to sync through the Microsoft Exchange setting; but this doesn't work any more. But I managed to set it up using the preconfigured gmail option in the configuration menu. This receives mail fine. My problem is that for every incoming message, it sends a blank message -- which in turn causes bounces/automated no reply messages etc.
Why is this?
As far as I'm aware there's no option for sending receipts that I can see?

Is 3G turned some? What you describe sounds like GSM buzz.

Explicity mapping between ActionScript and Java objects for the BlazeDS Messaging Service

The BlazeDS documentation shows how to explicitly map between ActionScript and Java objects. For example, this works fine for RPC services, e.g.
import flash.utils.IExternalizable;
import flash.utils.IDataInput;
import flash.utils.IDataOutput;
[Bindable]
[RemoteClass(alias="javaclass.User")]
public class User implements IExternalizable {
        public var id : String;
        public var secret : String;
        public function User() {
        public function readExternal(input : IDataInput) : void {
                id = input.readObject() as String;
        public function writeExternal(output : IDataOutput) : void {
                output.writeObject(id);
and
import java.io.Externalizable;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.ObjectInput;
import java.io.ObjectOutput;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.Set;
public class User implements Externalizable {
    protected String id;
    protected String secret;
    public String getId() {
        return id;
    public void setId(String id) {
        this.id = id;
    public String getSecret() {
        return secret;
    public void setSecret(String secret) {
        this.secret = secret;
    public void readExternal(ObjectInput in) throws IOException,
                ClassNotFoundException {
        id = (String) in.readObject();
    public void writeExternal(ObjectOutput out) throws IOException {
        out.writeObject(id);
If I called an RPC service that returns a User, the secret is not sent over the wire. Is it also possible to do this for the messaging service? That is, if I create a custom messaging adapter and use the function below, can I also prevent secret from being sent?
MessageBroker messageBroker = MessageBroker.getMessageBroker(null);
AsyncMessage message = new AsyncMessage();
message.setDestination("MyMessagingService");
message.setClientId(UUIDUtils.createUUID());
message.setMessageId(UUIDUtils.createUUID());
User user = new User();
user.setId("id");
user.setSecret("secret");
message.setBody(user);
messageBroker.routeMessageToService(message, null);

Hi Martin. The way that AMF serialization/deserialization works for BlazeDS is the same regardless of which service is being used, so yes that code will work for messaging as well. On the server, the serialization/deserialization of messages happens at the endpoint. For an incoming message for example, the endpoint deserializes the message and then hands it off to the MessageBroker which decides which service/destination to deliver the message to.
That was a good question. Thanks for asking it. Lots of people are used to doing custom serialization/deserialization with the RPC services (RemoteObject/RemotingService) but I'm not sure everyone realizes they can do this for messaging as well.
-Alex

C6 Incmoing calls and Incoming messages

I have bought a new C6 from India but I am currently based in New Zealand. I noticed an issue around unable to see name of the person for incoming calls and name of the person for incoming messages based on certain combinations of how I store the number.
If I store local new Zealand mobile numbers without '+64' and save it directly as 02XXXXXXXX (typical mobile numbers), I am able to see incoming calls with the name of the person on the display. But for the incoming messages from such contacts are displayed without name of the person.
So i tried to store the contact numbers with '+64' prefix, for example +642XXXXXXXX. In this case now I am able to see now incoming messages being identified with the name of the person. But now incoming calls from such contacts are now displayed without name and are displayed as numbers like 02XXXXXXXX.
I tried to find solutions and similar issues if encountered but these links didn't help.
/t5/Pool-of-Knowledge/Missing-Caller-ID-on-Calls-SMS/td-p/371913
/t5/Cseries/C6-and-incoming-calls/m-p/967053#M15406
Would be very glad to get a solution to the mentioned problem.

http://www.nokia.co.in/support/search?comp=Nokia+C6-00&qt=C6+incoming&cnt=1&page=6&cat=support&fullc...
Event the mentioned link didn't help.
Like first two points are not valid. But for the third point though I have make the changes as advised then I will not be able to identify from whom I have received the messages. If I edit contacts so as to identify messages then also it will not help as I will not be able to identify incoming calls by name.
Please help.

Weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException: Incoming message of size:

Hi ,
I have problems with the maximun message size using T3. I am trying to get large data from a remote client but i get the following exception(Here we are accessing jasper reports thru tomcat server from Weblogic,Tomcat and weblogic servers are in different machines). Even after setting the value -Dweblogic.MaxMessageSize parameter as '20000000', still the problem is alive on my tomcat system.
following is the error:
weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException: Incoming message of size: '10000080' bytes exceeds the configured maximum of: '10000000' bytes for protocol: 't3'
weblogic.rjvm.PeerGoneException: ; nested exception is:
weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException: Incoming message of size: '10000080' bytes exceeds the configured maximum of: '10000000' bytes for protocol: 't3'
Could any one suggest us to resolve this problem, Greatly appricated.
Regards,
Venkata Kumar

Hi,
Here we have weblogic and tomcat servers are running on different servers(Even both app server and web server on same m\c also we are facing same problem).this problem am facing while accessing jasper reports which contains results set more than 37000 records, am able to retreive the jasper reports successfully till 37000 records and if u provide query more than 37000 this is problem am encountering in tomcat side.I have deployed my jasper iReports stuff in weblogic server and web related stuff under tomcat server.
i am able to retreive the data successfully till 37000 records and more than that creating this problem on tomcat side.
Please let me know if you any more information on this issue.
Thanks a lot for quick response!
Thanks,
Venkata

SOAP message size limitation for sender soap adapter

Hi All,
We are facing critical production issue in case of sender SOAP Adapter,
If the sender soap message is having 114359 Bytes than the Third party is getting exception and SOAP request is not reaching XI.
If the message size is less then 100kbytes then no exception will come.
Is this a limitation that SOAP message size should not exceed 100kbyte?
Thnaks in advance
Best Regards,
Harleen Kaur Chadha

Hi ,
Thanks for your inputs,Could you please tell me which hardware configurations are you talking about?
Are you people talking about harware configurations for XI?
Best Regards,
Harleen Kaur Chadha

Maximum message size for internal users

Hi,
Is it possible to configure a maximum message size for internal users and also create exceptions?
The templates available in Transport Rules only allow for "when size of any attachment is greater or equal". This is not ideal as users can add 50 X 1MB attachaments to an email etc.
Configuring Transport settings or Receive Connectors do not allow for exceptions.
Thank you.

Hi Prakash,
Thanks for the link to the thread. The AD site link configuration is valid but does not account for the required exceptions. E.g User A can send unlimited size message to User B but not to User C.
The thread also mentions the Transport Rule configuration stated in my original post but that configuration has one major flaw. Users can circumvent the control by splitting attachments.

Modify Max Message Size for particular users

I have been requested to permit a group of users (identified with email accounts) to receive emails up to 30 MB. I have check that I have to make modifications in the HAT.
I think the only solution should be to create new policies:
Trusted-new
Blocked-new
Throttled-new
Accepted-new
and in every policy permit a Max Message Size of 30MB. After that, every user should be able to receive 30 MB emails.
Is there a way to permit that only for a group of receiving users, without considering the sender?
I would be glad if anybody get me a clue, thanks!!
Sergio

You would have to accept the message in the HAT and then use an Incoming Mail Policy to select recipient addresses. Add a content filter to that policy to select on size.
Since it sounds like only a few users should be able to recieve large messages you could use two policies.
1) Large message recipient policy
message size < 30mb, Action=DeliverNow
2) Default policy
If message > 10mb, Action=Bounce
You just can't bounce the messages right in the SMTP conversation is the only real limitation.

IronPort Email get message size statistic for some period

How can I get SUM of message size for incoming and outgoing messages.
Something like:
Message   Category
Messages
Message Size
Stopped by   Reputation Filtering
21,7%
100
Stopped as   Invalid Recipients
17,4%
80
Spam Detected
10,9%
50
Virus Detected
4,3%
20
Stopped by   Content Filter
2,2%
10
Total Threat   Messages:
56,5%
260
Clean Messages
43,5%
200
Total   Attempted Messages:
460

Hi Juraj,
the message size for the "Monitor - Overview" reporting page is not included. Only on the "Monitor - Incoming Mail" you will find the total message size per domain. Maybe you find something here, e.g. spamtowho which might be of help:
BR
Enrico

Property configuration for ccBPM incoming message size ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for