QA40 making usage decision for 03 lots with rejected MIC also

Hi Friends ,
QA40 is making Usage decision for 03 type lots having defects also and also for the lost having rejected MICs . can anybody explain why its so because SAP help has mentioned that for automatic UD there should be no rejected MIC .
Regards

What you are thinking about is QA10, not QA40.
QA40's criteria for making the UD is based upon the order status. I.e. the three radio buttons in the screen, orders completed, technically complete and confirmed.
The idea is once one of these statuses is reached, you wouldn't have any more testing. Also, it is not unusual to have out of spec results during in-process testing. In many industries that would be the norm, not the exception as often times a step in the process has a test repeatedly perform until a certain result is achieved. % water or % solids for instance.
03 lots also do not control stock. So it's not as critical that tests be in spec at this point to perform the UD.
Craig

Similar Messages

Changing posting date at usage decision for handle units. How?

Does anybody know how to change posting date at usage decision for handle units (HU)?
If the material is not managed by HU, SAP allows this modification (there's a button with a hat on it referring the material document header).
For HU I cannot seem to change posting date!
Seba

Yes it's possible! Well,...unless for versions 4.6C, 4.7 and ECC 5.
I've found SAP Note #752131 by which SAP declares that you can create the pushbutton from the Screen Painter referring the document header.
That's all,.....so simple, and it works fine!
This note applies ONLY to version 4.6C, 4.7and ECC 5 (which is the version the customer I am with has installed).
Thanks anyway.
Sebas

No Automatic Transfer order creation upon usage decision for 553 mtype

Scenario: We have quality and warehouse management active. Goods receipt is done against a purchase order. Stock comes into 902 storage type under stock category u201CQu201D. From 902 storage type, Goods issue to scrapping under quality( using IM movement type 553 ) is done using QA11. Normally, once GI to scrap under quality is done at IM level, WM movement type 551 gets triggered automatically in the background which creates a transfer order to move stock from 902 to 999 storage type under u201CQu201D stock category.
Problem: System unable to find storage bin for storage type 902 Q.
In our system, automatic TO creation from TR isnu2019t happening once the usage decision for 553 movement type happens. The TO creation process couldnu2019t recognize the stock which is available as u201CQu201D. It throws an error message u201Csource storage bin could not be foundu201D at the time of TO creation from TR. Putaway strategy for the physical storage types is FIXED BIN, MIXED STOCK ALLOWED and ADDITION TO EXISTING STOCK. 902 storage type has ADDITION TO EXISITNG STOCK and MIXED STOCK as a putaway strategy.
We have already activated auto TO creation settings at WM-IM reference movement types interface configuration.
Is there any setting missing at QM-WM interface?
Can someone please tell us a methodology to activate this transfer order creation process (WM mtype 551) for 553 IM mtype ?
Thanks in advance. Please reply.
Regards
Preetinder Singh
Phone: 404-468-8422

Hello,
I do not understand your scenario , u are saying are posting inspection lot to non WM storage location and again saying system can not find bin automatically.
"A transfer requirement (movement type 311 / destination u201C921 Transferu201D) is created after the inspection lot posting (QA11) but the auto-creation functionality is not possible since the u201CSystem cannot find source storage binu201D.
How can this auto-creation of a transfer order be realized since it is possible to create the transfer order manually via LB11 (entering source u201C902u201D / storage bin u201CPurchase Order no.u201D)?
The system cannot find the storage bin automatically.
Thank you in advance!"
Please let me know are u using quality interim storage area. If you clear material from quality and want material to go to bin then it should be warehouse managed storage location.
Regards,
Prashant

Selection of usage decision based on % of rejection done thorugh Insp Lot

My business scenario is as follows:-
I have created new usage decision codes as mentioned below through QS41and assigned the same to code group RI-UD and catalog 03.
I3 INITIAL REJECTION >75% to <=100 % (1)
I4 INITIAL REJECTION >50% to <=75% (40)
I5 INITIAL REJECTION >25% to <=50% (60)
I6 INITIAL REJECTION <=25% (80)
and quality score maintained the same through QS51
Code Group Code Shot Text for a code Code Valuation Quality Score
RI-UD I3 INITIAL REJECTION >75% to <=100 % (1) R Rejected (not OK) 1
RI-UD I4 INITIAL REJECTION >50% to <=75% (40) R Rejected (not OK) 40
RI-UD I5 INITIAL REJECTION >25% to <=50% (60) R Rejected (not OK) 60
RI-UD I6 INITIAL REJECTION <=25% (80) R Rejected (not OK) 80
I need to automate the selection of usage decision code to be done by system based on the accepted/rejected quantity entered.
How to go about it. Can anybody on this please?
Thanks in advance.
Ravi

Anything can be done SAP! But what you want would be all custom. There is no SAP functionality that would do that for you. I'd start with the auto UD program first. Have the programmers modify the selection parameters to select the list of lots. Than process those lots with the logic you want o use and change the UD accordingly. I'd make sure I could run the program manually as well. Similar to some of the other UD workload programs.
FF

Reversal of Usage Decision for insp type 10 lot

Dear Friends,
I am using the inspection type 10 for the inspection during despatch.
Please explain the process of reversing the usage decision specifically for a lot of insp type 10.
Regards,
Avinash

If the UD was already made, why do you have to cancel the UD?
You can change a UD via QA12.
You can cancel the delivery document.
Since inspection type 10's don't control stock, (they can block the PGI on the delivery), I wouldn't see any need to actually cancel the inspection lot once a UD was made.
Craig

QM Module: Usage Decision for Inspection Lot

Dear All,
After made of Usage Decision the Notification will receive to the respective Managers as mentioned below:
IF Usage Decision is QCR then Notification will receive to only Marketing Manager
IF Usage Decision is MR then Notification will receive to Logistics Manager, QC manager and Production Manager
IF Usage Decision is MA then Notification will receive to Logistics Manager, QC manager and Production Manager
IF Usage Decision is MAC then Notification will receive to Logistics Manager, QC manager and Production Manager
IF Usage Decision is QCA then Notification will receive to Logistics Manager, Marketing Manager and Production Manager
Any Suggestions pls, workflow logic in this requirement.
Is there any Solutions without ABAP coding.
Thanks and Regards,
Prabhakar Dharmala
Message was edited by:
Prabhakar Dharmala

I'm sorry, I am not sure if I understand any more now, but one quick check: When you write RULE, are you specifically meaning RESPONSIBILITY RULE?
I said that a rule is needed to specify work item agents (workflow step specification of selected agents). It is not quite true, you can specify the selected agents in other ways such as using expressions etc. You could therefore create a subtype of your business object where you define virtual attributes for the different agents you mentioned, i.e. a virtual attribute AG_MARKETING_MANAGER, another one called AG_LOGISTICS_MANAGER, a third one called AG_QC_MANAGER, and finally one called AG_PRODUCTION_MANAGER. These should have the data type TSWHACTOR.
However, you are asking for a method that does not involve rules, AND does not involve ABAP coding. I think you are out of luck there, because the virtual attributes will require (some) ABAP coding, and of course this approach is of more interest if these managers can be determined based on data that are maintained anyway - to save you the addition maintenance of the responsibility matrix in the workflow (responsibility) rule.
You can obtain exactly the same by creating a workflow rule that takes whatever parameters are relevant, plus the Usage Decision.
If you want to send a single step/mail to all the managers (I couldn't quite understand if you wanted a single step to a varying number of managers or a varying number of steps) the latter solution would be the best one, as the rule would give you the correct list of managers without any additional steps in the workflow.
If you create virtual attributes you can use container operations in the workflow to put all the relevant managers into one multiline container element. But that seems rather awkward compared to creating a workflow rule.

Usage Decision for an insp. lot

dear all
i want to make UD for an insp. lot of insp. type 06(return delivery).when i made ud it did not ask me for posting of that material.there is no insp. lot stock tab.can anybody help me to resolve this issue.

hi
inspection type 06 is non stock relevant ,hence you cannot able to post the material .
Processing materials as non-stock-relevant goods
If a material is not stock relevant, the system does not valuate and track the quantity of goods in an inspection lot. All inspection lots with the following inspection lot origins are not stock relevant:
·        02 - Goods issue
·        03 - Production
·        06 - Return from customer
·        07 - Audit
·        10 - Delivery to customer with sales order
·        11 - Delivery to customer without sales order
·        12 - Delivery (general)
·        13 - Production inspection on basis of run schedule header
·        14 - Plant maintenance
·        17 Externally triggered inspection
Posting stock-relevant materials to inspection stock
In inspection stock, QM has exclusive control over the material stock. This means that the material can only be posted in and out of inspection stock via the inspection lot. Materials can be posted to inspection stock for the following inspection lot origins:
·        01 - Goods receipt
·        04 - Goods receipt from production
·        05 - Miscellaneous goods receipt
·        08 - Stock transfer
·        09 - Recurring inspection
regards
thyagarajan

Usage decision for movment type 323

Hello
Can anyone tell me how I can post movment type 323 through QA11 with a usage decision?
I can see in config Quality Management>Quality Inspection>Inspection Lot Completion>Define Inventory Postings that there is a posting UD TRANSFER02 that uses 323 but I cannot see how this is posted through transaction QA11!
Thanks
Sue

hello,
Can you do this. in the config path Quality Management>Quality Inspection>Inspection Lot Completion>Define Inventory Postings , create a new entry with 08 suffix. Assign mvt type 323 to it.
In my system it comes with a description "other qty posting". Save it. now this new entry will show up in qa 11 in the inspection lot stock tab where you could post the quantity with this entry to trigger 323 mvt type.
Now go OMJJ and check for mvt 323 whether QA11 is in the allowed transactions , if not add it there/. ( Caution: 323 isnt meant to work with QA11)
now run qa11, it works fine.
But my question is if you arent accepting , rejecting or doing a sample, or other functions described for QA 11 UD , then you can just do a MB1B 323 and this should serve your purpose, why do this though QA11.
Hope this helps
Thanks,

Error during usage decision for Test Equipment

Hi,
I have completed results recording for Test Equipment using QE51N (results closed and confirmation completed). When I tried to make usage decision (QA11) for the lot the pop-up message shows as "Not all equipment is valuated! Do you want to force inspection completion. I also noticed that in equipment tab of qa11 code valuation column shows as Not Valuated.
I request you to help me to solve this problem.
Thanks & Regards
V.Devaraj

HI,
You may try changing the valuation mode in IA06. In the inspection characteristic overivew, click on details -> operation, scroll down, you will find Quality management inspection points -> maintain automatic valuation based on inspection points.
The changes if made will be effective only for the next inspeciton lots.
Regards,
M.M

Record usages decision- inspection lot stock

hi gurus,
when i am using a record usages decision screen (QA11) after putting my inspection lot number it show me only two tabs Defects and charterstics it didn't show me an inspection lot stock tab.
Please suggest
Regards
Maashish

Hi Maashish,
I believe that your PO is for cost center.
when you will recieve the material using MIGO for This PO, then matieal stock/Value will be posted to Consumtion Account ( Stck will not posted to store) and GR/IR for Vendor.
In this case if Inpection lot generated, then using QA11/QA32 you can records quality information in Result & UD.
In this case Transfer posting 321/105 for material will not take place.you can input quality inforamation only.
Hope this piece of info. will help to resolve your query..
Cheers
Manoj Singh

Posting after making usage decision-QM

hi all,
i have done the usage decision and posted only partial quantities, then how can i post the remaining materials in to unrestricted stock.
regards
thyagarajan

Thyagarajan,
In QA32 transaction selct the lot, click on Usage Decision button. In the Insp Stock posting tab page enter the remaining qty and save.
While selecting the lot in the initail screen choose the radio button "Lots with Usage Decision" or "All Inspection Lots".
Regards
Ram
Message was edited by:
Ramanujan Chitrakootam

Quality Management - usage decision

I understand the U/D is done through QA32. Can you suggest a transaction for mass processing of usage decision for multiple insp lots

QA11 is also UD for a single lot, you can try using QA16 which collective UD for Inspection lots.
RJ

BAPI or FM for changing usage decision on Inspection lot

Hi,
Does anyone know of any BAPI or FM which can change usage decision on inspection lot. I'm already aware of BAPI_INSPLOT_SETUSAGEDECISION. This only works when there is no UD on inspection lot.
Thanks for your help.
Stephen

hi peter,
BAPI_INSPCHAR_SETRESULT Confirm Inspection Results. BAPI_INSPLOT_GETDETAIL Load Detail Data and Usage Decision for Inspection Lot
see this link for list of bapis....
http://www.sapbapi.com/bapi-list/
thanks
sagar
reward me points if usefull

Work flow for Rejections in Quality- Usage decision

Dear all
We are in the process of activating work flow for Quality Inspection, During Usage decision there may be rejections for which we need to trigger a mail to the Internal department , stating the Remarks, description, rejected quantity etc ,
If any one has come across the same scenario kindly help us so as to implement the same in our organization.
Regards
Rahul Bhat

Hi,
You can do any of the following according to you Requirement.
1) Below the Rejection Branch using the Send mail you can send the mail to Respective person.
2) Other wise using the Function Module you can send the mail, refer this l[ink|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/nYKdAw ].
3) Else place this Std. Task TS20000139 and provide the necessary binding below the Rejection branch a popup will open and the user can enter the comments and it will go to the Person whom you want.
Try any of this according to you requirement.
Regards,
Surjith Kumar

Automatic TO Creation for QM Usage Decision

Dear Gurus
We all know WM TO to releasing stock from QI to UU or return goods to vendor can be created automatically,
My question is, when the usage decision is split into two, some material going into stock, and some returned to vendor. for return to vendor, SAP will do automatic transfer, but for material go into stock, SAP is not release Q status in WMS to unrestricted (blank), I have set the movement 321 to create TO automatically and post into same bin.
FYI, if the transaction is separated, SAP perform well (transfer Q to unrestricted done automatically and return to vendor also done automatically)
Is there any solution for this problem?
Thanks and Regards
CJ Lee

Hi,
In case of a usage decision for a partial quantity, it is not possible to create the TO for the generated posting change notice automatically. This is only possible when the full quantity is released. The same happens if you release a partial quantity and post the rest using a different stock posting. The reason is, there needs to be a user decision, which part of the quantity has to be posted, this is necessary for example when the quantity is distributed in the warehouse over many storage bins. But even if the full quantity is on one storage bin, there is no automatic TO creation. You can see this also in the online processing LT05), in case of partial quantities you have to enter the selected quantity in the quant list, for a full posting this is not necessary.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sinéad Curran

QA40 making usage decision for 03 lots with rejected MIC also

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for