QoS for individual users

Hello all,
I'm trying to apply QoS in my LAN network in order to give dedicated bandwidth to 100 users if any user is trying to go to www.youtube.com. For rest of the traffic, I don't need to dedicate the amount of bandwidth.
As per my solution, I can create a class-map matching pattern "*youtube*" to classify the destination but not sure how can I define these 100 users in separate way.
The issue is, if I give the range 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.127 in ACL, I think the bandwidth will be shared amongst the users in 10.0/25 network. Or, I have to write 100 individual ACLs & class-maps right?
Can somene help me finding the feasible solution for the same? I think I have only issue with my LAN side where i'm not being able to understand how ACL & Class-map works in this situation.
Thanks in advance!

Hi Hari!
What platform and software is this for? Some platforms support microflow policing but I think it's only available for higher end equipment such as 6500.
Daniel Dib
CCIE #37149
Please rate helpful posts.

Similar Messages

How to block calls based ANI for individual user?

I want to know how to block calls based on ANI for individual user in CUCM? Lets say if the individual wants to block calls from certain number.
Malicious call id - softkey will not work for our purpose.
calls come to cucm via mgcp gateway. cucm 9.x
thanks,

How to block calls has been asked hundreds, and hundreds of times at CSC, a simple search would have provided you with all the necesarry information. Please search before you ask
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-19628
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

"Role not defined for individual users" on user import

Hello,
I am trying to import a certain user from one portal to another and I get this warning message:
"Role <pcd_role_path> not defined for individual users."
This role is assigned to this user at the 1st portal and exists at the 2nd portal at the same location.
What does it mean and what do I need to do in this case?

hi Roy,
just check one thing ....
please check wether the user have permissions to those roles.
please go to the PCD location, where the roles have defined.
right click on the role and check permissions.
see if the user you are using is mentioned there. if no, add your user with read/write end user permission.
i hope this will help you .
Regards,
Sujay

How-to: Disable syncing of document library for individual users or groups

Currently, as far as I know, disabling syncing for a document library is all or nothing - everyone with access can sync, or nobody can sync.
Ideally, there would be an independent list permission, "disable syncing," which appears when assigning permissions to a permission level. (Syncing is allowed by default if access to document library is granted, opposed to an alternative
approach of having "enable syncing" which would set the default the other way).
Given that this level of granularity is not provided out of the box (yet?),
is there any way (SPD?) to disable syncing for individuals? (Or to disable syncing for the entire library, then enable syncing to individual users? Depends on who there is more of, 'syncers' or 'nonsyncers'.)
* I know that syncing can be disabled across the board. This is not an option.
(2) "Open with Explorer" seems to be tied in with syncing, disabling syncing disables "Open with Explorer". Is there a way to keep "Open with Explorer" functionality while disabling syncing?

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you want to disable sync option in library.
To disable sync option, and keen the open with explore option, we can use the JavaScript to achieve it.
I have made a code demo below to disable sync option for a particular user, it works like a charm, you can modify it to fit your scenario.
<script src="../jquery-1.11.0.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="../jquery.SPServices-2014.01.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var userid= _spPageContextInfo.userId;
var requestUri = _spPageContextInfo.webAbsoluteUrl + "/_api/web/getuserbyid(" + userid + ")";
var requestHeaders = { "accept" : "application/json;odata=verbose" };
$.ajax({
url : requestUri,
contentType : "application/json;odata=verbose",
headers : requestHeaders,
success : onSuccess,
error : onError
function onSuccess(data, request){
var loginName = data.d.Title;
//alert(loginName);
if(loginName=="Administrator"){
$("a[id='ctl00_SyncPromotedAction']").hide();
function onError(error) {
alert("error");
</script>
Thanks & Regards,
Jason
Jason Guo
TechNet Community Support

Turn off log level for Individual Users

Hi,
we want to turn off logging level of individual users. We usually go to Identity and click on the user to set log level '0' but we have LDAP security setup so don't have idea how to do it.
Any Ideas
Thxs
SYK

Ok I will try to Set System Variable LOGLEVEL
As we are using LDAP security we will not have users in RPD so i cant set to'0' in rpd.
New Question: Suppose If I am able to set log level to '0' for a user i.e User1 and when he logs into OBIEE and get's a error while running report like say table or view doesn't exist or non of fact table is compatible or number records exceed etc... and Error will show to user as Error Number and says "Please contact System Administrator for more details".
Me considering as Admin if i want to debug that error that User1 is getting from above scenario and when i open nqquery log file will I be able to see the log for that report which User1 is getting error or will it show NO LOGLEVEL Found.
Thxs
SYK

Restricting category for individual users

Hello,
This is probably a stupid question but I have googled and googled it and can't figure out the answer. We just started using FDM and currently I am the only user. I am setting up additional user accounts and would like to restrict their access. I was able to set up the new users in User Maintenance, set the access to Intermediate-3, and restrict their access to one location.
I am having issues figuring out how to restrict access to Category. We have multiple categories like Budget and Actual but I would like to restrict the other users access to just Actual. Is it possible to restrict access to category by user?
Thanks!

Not a silly question. If you only have a few users, the simplest option is to use the "Global" setting on the Point of view. this prevents the non-admin users from changing the period or category in the Point of view which can only be amended by an admin user. (A Limitation of this (Needs confirming) is that if you are working on a different category when a user signs in, that is the category they would have access to)
A second option may be to have each user have their own location (assuming they are posting to different target entities), and then use the POV lock but that is a bit more maintenance as you would need to lock the Current Point of View base don location/period/category that you wish to restrict.
Both the above are explained in the admin guide
a third option would be to amend the Category adaptor script so for each user only the category(s) they are entitled to use are displayed (Rather than hard-code each user you may wish to hold the user / category details in a special location / mapping table that only an adminstrator can access)
a fourth option (similar to the third) might be to do something similar in an event script. I haven't used them but there is a Securitychanged event script and a POVChanged event script which might do the job.

Assigned to user Notification for individual user/analyst

Hello All,
I am all new to SCSM.
I have been given a SCSM deployment project by my management.
I have successfully deployed the Management Server, Data Warehouse Server and the SQL Server.
I am now into the configuration and the customization part of the project (the real game).
I have created the Exchange connector and created few e-mail accounts for testing purpose.
I have Wintel Team which works on the Windows Servers related issues. The Wintel team has got 5 team members.
Now I have created e-mail notification templates to notify the individual team member and the whole team, when the incident is being assigned to them.
A workflow and subscriptions are also created for both (the team and the individual team member).
Now my question is : Is there any way to create a single subscription for all 5 team members but they are notified individually only when an incident is assigned to them.
I have tested for one and its working fine. Just to avoid multiple subscriptions I wish to create only one. Is it possible or is there any workaround to this problem ?
Appreciate your responses in advance :)
Regards
Manu

The typical resolution to this is to create a subscription that targets a related role relationship. you'll want to create a subscription (or workflow, identical method for either) that has some dummy criteria (i.e. Title = "BLAH! this isn't real, just
a searchable string <FIND AND FIX ME>" and get it to look like you want it, and then use
this method, and export your notification MP out and to replace the dummy criteria (which should look like this:)
<InstanceSubscription Type="$MPElement[Name='WorkItem!System.WorkItem.Incident']$">
<UpdateInstance>
<Criteria>
<Expression>
<SimpleExpression>
<ValueExpression>
<Property State="Pre">$Context/Property[Type='WorkItem!System.WorkItem.Incident']/Title$</Property>
</ValueExpression>
<Operator>NotEqual</Operator>
<ValueExpression>
<Value>BLAH! this isn't real, just a searchable string &ltFIND AND FIX ME&gt</Value>
</ValueExpression>
</SimpleExpression>
</Expression>
</Criteria>
</UpdateInstance>
</InstanceSubscription>
with something like the following:
<RelationshipSubscription RelType="$MPElement[Name='WorkItem!System.WorkItemAssignedToUser']$" SourceType="$MPElement[Name='WorkItem!System.WorkItem.Incident']$" TargetType="$MPElement[Name='System!System.Domain.User']$">
<AddRelationship />
</RelationshipSubscription>
This will send a notification any time the Assigned To user relationship is created (or replaced).

Ical service for individual user

Hi,
I have a leopard server. I have created 4 groups in the server and there are 10 users in each group. Now I want each user to have his own calendar which no body else can see and also a group calendar, which the user of the group can see.
Please help me in this,
Arun

Hi
+"I don't see this option. Am I doing doing something wrong?"+
Your Rider seems to indicate 10.6? If you're not seeing this option in WorkGroup Manager I'm guessing you're using 10.6 Server? In which case you've posted in the wrong forum with a question that's not applicable anymore. Apple removed those options in 10.6. Another possibility is you're trying to manage a 10.5 Server using 10.6 Server Admin Tools and it's giving unpredictable results? The Server Administration Applications cab behave oddly if you're trying use a newer version on an older server. You should use the version of the Tools that came with the Server.
The 10.6 iCal Server Admin Manual is here:
http://manuals.info.apple.com/enUS/iCalServerv10.6.pdf
Tony

How to set SMB and FTP sharing for different users?

In Tiger FTP and SMB sharing was different options with their own settings each other. In Leopard there if i enable user for sharing, it enables for all protocols together.
Another problem. In file sharing i can add shared folder, but what's sens of it, if the whole filesystem is shared (at least FTP and AFP, not SMB, thanks god) and there's no way to remove this share. Just shortcut? How can i create ftp sharing, allowing user to see only his folder, not the whole filesystem?
Any advices are pleased, except to get Leopard Server Thank you.

OS X Client FTP implementation is not comprehensive at all. Apple does not make FTP serving a priority for OS X (on the general principle that it is not really necessary for most consumers). Thus, by default you can't enable/disable FTP for individual users. Nor can you create FTP only users.
However, a useful product called [Pure-FTPd|http://www.pureftpd.org/project/pure-ftpd], provides the missing functionality for free to all UNIX based systems. Even better, [PureFTPd Manager|http://jeanmatthieu.free.fr/pureftpd> provides a GUI on OS X for managing it.
This product is probably overkill for a single-user situation - but it is a great example of leveraging the UNIX platform of OS X to significantly enhance file sharing capabilities to server level.
Cheers,
Rodney

Performance issues STWB_2 for some users

A small amount of users have performance issues when executing transaction STWB_2 -> selecting a test plan and go to the message overview.
This action acts different for users with the same roles and parameters in their user master record. Executing STWB_2, selecting the same test plan and go to message overview takes 30 minutes for user 1 and 2 minutes for user 2.
Different behavior for individual users with the same access doing the same selection.
The only "solution" that works is re-creating the user master of the user with performance problems, and giving it a different name. This is not really an option and best practices.
Has anybody experienced the same issue and can give me tips and or tricks how to solve this?

Hi,
a colleague told me that it seems that user 2 has set a user customizing that causes the data to be read newly (maybe remotely) instead of using the buffer. To check this go to the status analysis and select a status icon. Switch to the message tab and click on the icon user settings. Uncheck the flag "Use current message data".
Regards
Andreas

EAS LOGS for indidual Users

Hello Team
is there any way to pull out the EAS logs for individual user from the IIS directory, instead of searching the user in each log files?
Am using exchange 2007 and i would like to review the EAS connectivity for one particular user who is having the problem in viewing his inbox in mobile.so that i would like to look the LOGS for any errors for the particular users

You could import the file into Excel and sort through them. Or maybe the log parser tool might be helpful.
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Update BBP_APPROVAL_LIMIT for mass users (Personalization)

Hello ,
To update the approval limit for individual users , one can do so by using SU01 --> Personalization --> BBP_APPROVAL_LIMIT
Can anybody let us know if we can update the same for n numbers of users (say 1000 users) by mass changes.
Regards
Chetan Agrawal

HI Satya,
Won't updating the value in PFCG personalization tab change it for all users having that role , i want to update it for selective but mass users.
I guess the personalization is SU01 has priority over personalization in PFCG.
Regards
Chetan

QOS to police individual users

Hi Guys,
I know the basics of QOS so I'm hoping some of the experts out there can help out here. I currently have a 10 Mb WAN link between users and a server farm which I have policed down to 8Mb for users accessing the servers. What I want to be able to do is police individual users that they can only use a max of 2Mb to access the servers but as a group they can use up to the 8Mb. I am using 2821 on either side of the WAN link.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers
Mark

Thanks for the response Konrad.
I thought about that but unfortunately we have up to 200 users at the site so that would
a little over the top to create a class for each individual IP address.

Individual database segments responsible for significant user I/O wat found

Hi ,
As I collected addm report.
And I found "Individual database segments responsible for significant user I/O wait were
found."
Please suggest for further investigation/solution on the same.
Thanks,

you might be getting SQL with these ADDM report , these SQL need to be addressed by running that query with setting autotrace traceonly , paste the result of this trace here.

Photoshop CS6 not opening for a few individual users.

Hi.
We're a college and we're having trouble with Photoshop CS6 opening for 4 [at the moment] individual users. The error follows them from mac to mac, but another ue can log on after them and everything works fine, so it must somehow be linked to their profiles, but we've reset/deleted these and it's made no difference. I've attached screenshots of the 4 error messages they get. Could someone point us in the right direction as to what we need to do, because at the moment these students cannot do their work properly?
Thank you in advance.
Richard Loveday
Epping Forest College
[email removed]

This page tells you where the users' preferences files are located. Double check permissions and ownership of those files.
http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/kb/preference-file-names-locations-photoshop.html
-Noel

QoS for individual users

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for