Querry on Cisco WLC 2006

Hi ,
Need one help from you.Please let me know Cisco WLC 2006 ( Running version 4.2.207) will support Access Point 1242AG ?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks & Regds,
Lalit

Hi Sabastian,
Thanks for your reply.My question was I have a Wireless Lan Controller 2006 with 1030 Access Points registered to that and i wants to add AP1242AG.The Current version running on WLC 2006 is 4.2.207.I wants to add 1242AG Access Point to the 2006 WLC.Will my current WLC with current running version of image will support AP1242AG ?
Please reply.
Thanks & Regds,
Lalit

Similar Messages

  • Issues upgrading WLC-2006

    I cannot seem to get past the "transfer download start" (CLI) or "download" (GUI) phase of the upgrade on a WLC-2006 -- from 3.2.171.5 to 4.2.209.0. The transfer consistently times out at about 76% complete and I receive an error message, either "error writing to flash" or "error writing output file" (or something similar). Any suggestions/recommendations would be greatly appreciated.

    You can't upgrade from 3.X to 4.2.209 direct.  You need to upgrade to 4.0.206.0 first before going anyware.  It's specified in the Release Notes.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn422090.html#wp233853

  • WLC 2006 DHCP locking up

    We have a WLC 2006 that is setup to distribute IPs to wireless clients using the internal DHCP server. Occasionally, wireless clients can connect to the APs (four 1131AGs) but do not get IP addresses assigned.
    Rebooting the WLC temporarily fixes the problem.
    software version is 4.0.155.0
    anyone experiencing this or know of a solution?
    thanks!

    Apparently, others have observed similar DHCP behavior.
    You may want to read a related thread ("Wireless Clients eventually not issued DHCP through WLC4404") in the "General" conversation section.
    LINK:
    http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Wireless%20-%20Mobility&topic=General&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1ddc63fc

  • Wlc 2006 mac filtering

    I would like to allow client to access wireless lan based on the client mac-address.
    How I config it on WLC 2006 locally (not using radius server)? If yes, How mnay mac-address can be configured on the wlc2006?
    Thanks.
    Douglas

    Hi Douglas,
    Just wanted to add a note to Ankurs good info;
    Maximum MAC Filter Entries
    The controller database can contain up to 2048 MAC filter entries for local netusers. The default value is 512. To support up to 2048 entries, you must enter this command in the controller CLI:
    config database size MAC_filter_entry
    where MAC_filter_entry is a value from 512 to 2048.
    From this good doc;
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6366/prod_release_note09186a0080813b1c.html#wp42756
    MAC Filtering
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6366/products_user_guide_chapter09186a00805a6ad0.html#wp1040588
    Hope this helps!
    Rob

  • WLC 2006 LWAPP issue?

    Hi, I am setting up a WLC2006 with 2 AP1010's. I cannot get the controller to see either AP. When I place the AP's on a network with a WLC 4400, they are recogized immediately by the 4400 at Layer-2 LWAPP.
    Since the WLC2006 only works at Layer-3 LWAPP, do I have an AP icompatibility issue with the AP1010's(since I can only get them to work at Layer-2 LWAPP)?
    Any advice is greatly appreciated.
    Chris

    According to Cisco doc., L2 mode is supported by WLC 44xx & 41xx and not supported by WLC 2006. And the 1010 supports L2 mode only, so the 1010 cannot works w/ 2006. You have to upgrade the AP to 1200, 1130 or 1240 or the WLC to 4xxx. And, don't know is there any future IOS / firmware can support it. Hopes this help.

  • Cisco WLC 2500 AP-Manager

    hello
    i have a question about a cisco wlc 2500.
    when you configure a interface on the controller, you can set a ip address
    mask en DHCP server address but also you can set the interface as a AP-Manager
    why is this?
    thanks

    On the old WLC models like 2100, 2006,4400 we had to configure the management interface for managing the WLC and the AP manager so that the APs could create the LWAPP or CAPWAP tunnel to the WLC.
    On the new model of WLCs like the 2500,5508 the AP manager interface is not required, the management interface if it has the check for dynamic interface it will work at the same time as the AP manager interface.
    Here is the link where you can check on how to deploy the 2504 WLC and the different setups to use with several AP managers.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11630/products_tech_note09186a0080b8450c.shtml

  • WLC 2006 EEPROM

    I'm a teatcher in the Technical High-School of Geneva.
    We have a project in the laboratory with a CISCO AIR-WLC2006-K9 V1. Due a bug (CISCO Field Notice: FN-62555; http://www.cisco.com/en/US/ts/fn/620/fn62555.html) Bug in CISCO IOS, the EEPROM (contain MAC address, serial Number, …) was erased and now the device can't boot.
    It's a never used equipment and CISCO won't repair this (don't support this, End of Live ?)
    Does someone could copy the EEPROM of its controller and send me the file ?
    Many thanks in advance !

    It's true, I must find an EEPROM but on the side of the Cisco product is no longer supported ! But we do not have money to buy a new WLC for Student's laboratory
    Do you still have a wlc 2006 ?
    if yes, would it be possible to have a copy of the contents of the EEPROM ?

  • HA in Cisco WLC

    Hi friends,
    I am planning to have a wireless environment for a corporate company. I would like to have a Cisco wireless LAN controller 2100 series and 15 numbers of cisco aironet 1142 n access point. Since wireless is gonna be a very important medium for the premises, I am planning to have high availability for the 2100 series WLC.
    With this scenario I am having the following of queries?
    1. Does high availability is supported with WLC 2100 series or need to go for an hihger end WLC's? It would be great if I am guided with some documents on this?
    2. My wired switching infrastructure at the core is running with GLBP. Can I connect the both WLC in each switch in an dual home architecture?
    3. Is there any pre-requistes for doing the high availability for the WLc's?
    4. Yet another company that is close to me do have the same architecture for wireless infrastructure, except that they have cisco WLC as 5508 and Cisco aironet 1142n access point. All the end points NIC adapters that they have support a/b/g standard. But with an n series they continously report low signal strength, the reason for this still unknown?
         But the tech documents of 'n' series access point claims that they support, 300Mbps within 33 feet and 200 Mbps within 66 feet.
    They are having 2 nos of Cisco 1142n access point for every 30 feet but still they are facing low signal strength. Also there workspace are all cubicles and without any interference.
    It would be great if I am guided on this issue also?
    Regards,
    Karthik Anbumani

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-qformat:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
    mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
    mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
    line-height:115%;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:11.0pt;
    font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
    mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
    Hi Karthik,
    You can build this HA solution based on the 2100 controllers. And if you want HA for 15 access points you need two 2125 controllers. But I will suggest that you consider the 5508 controller since that is a more future proof hardware and will give you more features that you might want to use such as Office Extend.
    Right now there is a bundle available for one 5508 with 10 x AIR-LAP1142 and the GPL price for that bundle is USD 31,424. And you should consider if you need the HA solution or if you are covered by the onsite support. In the product list below I have used the regulatory domain E and power cable for Europe. Make sure that you get this correct for your country. This is a limited offer ending August 1st 2010. You also need the additional 5 access points or more if you want Office Extend.
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-qformat:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
    mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
    mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
    line-height:115%;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:11.0pt;
    font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
    mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
    Also consider that the 2100 series only have FastEthernet interfaces so you will not be able to utilize the full 11n throughput.
    1 x 5508 with 10 x 1142:
    Product
    Description
    Quantity
    Price
    Lead Time
    AIR-CT25-1140E10
    802.11a/g/n ESTI Cfg5508-25 10AP WCS Demo Promo ends 8/1/10
    1
    24,595.00
    14 Days
    AIR-CT5508-25-K9Z
    5508 Series Controller for up to 25 APs
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    AIR-PWR-5500-AC
    Cisco 5500 Series Wireless Controller Redundant Power Supply
    1
    1,495.00
    14 Days
    SWC5500K9-70
    Cisco Unified Wireless Controller SW Release 7.0
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    AIR-PWR-CORD-CE
    AIR Line Cord Central Europe
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    AIR-LAP1142N-E-K9Z
    Manufacturing Level PID - AIR-LAP1142N-E-K9
    10
    0.00
    14 Days
    S114RK9W-12421JA
    Cisco 1140 Series IOS WIRELESS LAN LWAPP RECOVERY
    10
    0.00
    LIC-CT5508-25
    25 AP Base license
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    LIC-CT5508-BASE
    Base Software License
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    WCS-CD-K9Z
    CD With Windows And Linux. No License.
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    CON-OSP-CT25E10
    ONSITE 24X7X4 802.11a/g/n ESTI Cfg: 5508-25; 10APs;
    1
    0.00
    CON-OSP-CT0825
    ONSITE 24X7X4 Cisco 5508 Series
    1
    2,944.00
    CON-OSP-1142EK9Z
    ONSITE 24X7X4 802.11a/g/n Fixed AP
    10
    2,390.00
    Total   LeadTime: 14 Days  Total Price: USD   31,424.00
    Total LeadTime: 14 Days  Total Price: USD 31,424.00
    2 x 2125 with 10 x 1142:
    Product
    Description
    Quantity
    Price
    Lead Time
    AIR-WLC2125-K9
    2100 Series WLAN Controller for up to 25 Lightweight APs
    1
    8,995.00
    21-35 Days
    CAB-AC-C5-EUR
    AC Power Cord, Type C5, Europe
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    SWLC2100K9-70
    Cisco Unified Wireless Controller SW Release 7.0
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    ASA5505-PWR-AC
    ASA 5505 AC Power Supply Adapter
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    SSC-BLANK
    ASA 5505 SSC Blank Slot Cover
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    CON-OSP-AC2125K9
    ONSITE 24X7X4 WLAN Controller for for Retail
    1
    1,656.00
    Total   LeadTime: 21 - 35 Days   Total Price:   USD 10,651.00
    Product
    Description
    Quantity
    Price
    Lead Time
    AIR-WLC2125-K9
    2100 Series WLAN Controller for up to 25 Lightweight APs
    1
    8,995.00
    21-35 Days
    CAB-AC-C5-EUR
    AC Power Cord, Type C5, Europe
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    SWLC2100K9-70
    Cisco Unified Wireless Controller SW Release 7.0
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    ASA5505-PWR-AC
    ASA 5505 AC Power Supply Adapter
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    SSC-BLANK
    ASA 5505 SSC Blank Slot Cover
    1
    0.00
    14 Days
    CON-OSP-AC2125K9
    ONSITE 24X7X4 WLAN Controller for for Retail
    1
    1,656.00
    Total   LeadTime: 21 - 35 Days   Total Price:   USD 10,651.00
    Product
    Description
    Quantity
    Price
    Lead Time
    AIR-LAP1142-EK9-PR
    LAP1142 Controller Based E Reg Domain
    1
    9,950.00
    14 Days
    S114RK9W-12421JA
    Cisco 1140 Series IOS WIRELESS LAN LWAPP RECOVERY
    1
    0.00
    AIR-LAP1142-EBULK
    BOM LEVEL PID FOR BULK PACK
    10
    0.00
    14 Days
    CON-OSP-LAP1142E
    ONSITE 24X7X4 802.11a/g/n Fixed Unified AP; ETSI
    10
    2,390.00
    CON-OSP-L1142E0P
    ONSITE 24X7X4 802.11a/g/n LWAPP AP EU Cnfg-Promo Pk
    1
    0.00
    Total   LeadTime: 14 Days  Total Price: USD   12,340.00
    Total LeadTime: 21 - 35 Days   Total Price: USD 33,542.00
    Regards,
    André

  • Cisco wlc ios 7.2 with clients windows 8 can not authenticate with 802.1x

    Hello my name is Ivan:
    I have a solution a unified solution wireless with a cisco wlc 7.2 and ap cisco. My issue is the follow:
    My users are using laptops with OS windows 8, and they can not access to the network wireless because they authenticate in to the network using 802.1x wpa/wpa2 with tkip or aes.
    I find a bug in the ios of the wlc. The number is CSCua29504. I would not to change the drivers in the laptop to join the users in to the solution.
    Please is possible to find any software to do the upgrade in the wlc? Or perhaps we need to do an upgrade in to cisco lightweight access point?
    Please help me in this issue.
    Regards
    Ivan

    Bug ID CSCua29504 has been fixed in WLC firmware 7.0.235.3, 7.3.101.X or 7.4.100.X.
    So if you are NOT running any one of these codes, then yes.  Upgrade your firmware is your solution.
    Fixed in:  (12)
    7.4(100.0),7.4(1.20),7.3(112.0),7.3(101.0),7.3(1.67)
    7.2(111.3),7.2(111.1),7.2(110.4),7.0(236.0),7.0(235.3)

  • Cisco WLC 2504 webportal for Server 2008 R2 DC LDAP or RADIUS

    HI,Friends.
    I want to get my mobile or Notebook clients connecting to wireless and use my Domain users ,Cisco WLC 2504 to authenticate via LDAP or  RADIUS to our Windows Server 2008 Domain Controllers
    question:
    one,i can use my domain one Organizational Unit ,such as cn=use01,ou=test,dc=lzh,dc=com. now, noly user01 can logon on web, But how I make all my domain users can use web log it ? 
    I was using radius authentication or ldap certification to do web authentication ?which is good. ???
    I specified child ou, ou its users superiors can not be landed on

    hi ,Scott Fella
    Thank you,I am very happy to receive your reply,  I finally binding domain user authentication LDAP authentication done successfully. but You say the combination of nps I did not do the radius authentication is successful, I do not know where the problems.
    the err:
    <Event><Timestamp data_type="4">07/27/2014 18:33:36.845</Timestamp><Computer-Name data_type="1">PDC-CQ</Computer-Name><Event-Source data_type="1">IAS</Event-Source><User-Name data_type="1">11</User-Name><Service-Type data_type="0">1</Service-Type><NAS-IP-Address data_type="3">10.10.10.253</NAS-IP-Address><NAS-Port data_type="0">1</NAS-Port><NAS-Identifier data_type="1">WLC-CNNEWCITY</NAS-Identifier><NAS-Port-Type data_type="0">19</NAS-Port-Type><Vendor-Specific data_type="2">00003763010600000001</Vendor-Specific><Calling-Station-Id data_type="1">10.12.0.11</Calling-Station-Id><Called-Station-Id data_type="1">10.10.10.253</Called-Station-Id><Client-IP-Address data_type="3">10.10.10.253</Client-IP-Address><Client-Vendor data_type="0">0</Client-Vendor><Client-Friendly-Name data_type="1">WLC</Client-Friendly-Name><Proxy-Policy-Name data_type="1">Use Windows authentication for all users</Proxy-Policy-Name><Provider-Type data_type="0">1</Provider-Type><SAM-Account-Name data_type="1">CNNEWCITY\11</SAM-Account-Name><Class data_type="1">311 1 10.10.10.1 07/27/2014 09:41:28 5</Class><Authentication-Type data_type="0">1</Authentication-Type><NP-Policy-Name data_type="1">Connections to other access servers</NP-Policy-Name><Quarantine-Update-Non-Compliant data_type="0">1</Quarantine-Update-Non-Compliant><Fully-Qualifed-User-Name data_type="1">cnnewcity.com/user/test/11</Fully-Qualifed-User-Name><Packet-Type data_type="0">1</Packet-Type><Reason-Code data_type="0">0</Reason-Code></Event>
    <Event><Timestamp data_type="4">07/27/2014 18:33:36.845</Timestamp><Computer-Name data_type="1">PDC-CQ</Computer-Name><Event-Source data_type="1">IAS</Event-Source><Class data_type="1">311 1 10.10.10.1 07/27/2014 09:41:28 5</Class><Fully-Qualifed-User-Name data_type="1">cnnewcity.com/user/test/11</Fully-Qualifed-User-Name><Quarantine-Update-Non-Compliant data_type="0">1</Quarantine-Update-Non-Compliant><Client-IP-Address data_type="3">10.10.10.253</Client-IP-Address><Client-Vendor data_type="0">0</Client-Vendor><Client-Friendly-Name data_type="1">WLC</Client-Friendly-Name><Proxy-Policy-Name data_type="1">Use Windows authentication for all users</Proxy-Policy-Name><Provider-Type data_type="0">1</Provider-Type><SAM-Account-Name data_type="1">CNNEWCITY\11</SAM-Account-Name><NP-Policy-Name data_type="1">Connections to other access servers</NP-Policy-Name><Authentication-Type data_type="0">1</Authentication-Type><Packet-Type data_type="0">3</Packet-Type><Reason-Code data_type="0">66</Reason-Code></Event>
    then,You gave two figures is that what you mean? what's the meaning it that services-type =login ?

  • Certificate based authentication with Cisco WLC and Juniper IC

    Hi
    I have a cisco WLC 4400 and Juniper IC which works as the external Radius server.
    I want the wireless clients to be authenticated using certificates. I know the Juniper IC can understand certificates.
    My question is can cisco WLC understand that the information being presented to it by the client is not username/pwd but a user certificate.
    i have also looked at this article :
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/4400-series-wireless-lan-controllers/100590-ldap-eapfast-config.html
    What i don't understand here is the need of WLC authenticating the user with his credentials by LDAP when it has authenticated the user cert.
    All your help is appreciated.

    Hi,
    Since you use an external radius server you don't have to worry for this.
    The only config that you need to do on WLC is to define the radius server under Security-AAA-Radius-Authentication and on your WLAN-Security-AAA.
    The doc you refer is only for Local Radius on WLC.
    Hope this helps
    Regards,
    Christos

  • Generate one time authentication for Guest on Cisco WLC

    Hi All
    Sorry for my question, because I just started to work with Cisco WLC.
    I have created some WLAN for local users with authentication by 802.1x + Radius by certificate.
    For Guest I used PSK with MAC-filtering.
    But I see that is not comfortable for Guests, each time they come and want to access our wireless, we have to come and get their MAC.
    I checked on Internet and find that the wireless solution for Hotel, Resorts are very easy.
    I also googled and see that Cisco WLC support Lobby Ambassador to generate Guest username/password. But as I checked, this username/password might only use with Web-Auth, this method is not comfortable for Guest who don't know they have to go to Web-Auth to do authentication (e.g: when they only get pop3 email, or vpn, ... not use browsers)
    Could I use this method (or another method) for creating one time Guest wireless username/password or Guest PSK that can be used for authentication when Guests click to Wireless-SSID name only (no need to open web browser to do Web-Auth).
    Regards
    Hai

    Hi Choudhary
    Thank you much for your information
    Could I reconfirm about my concern.
    With Cisco WLC, I can use WebAuth with Guest user only
    If I want to use Guest user for authentication when guests connect to SSID (not by WebAuth, I means use Layer 2 security only, not Layer 3), I will have to use additional Radius Server.
    And if I understand right, could you please recommend me software based Radius Server with support generate one time username/password for Guest, because I checked IAS/NPS on windows server may not have this function (ISE is not appropriate for us at this time, due to high expense)
    Regards
    Hai

  • Cisco WLC 2500 - 802.1x with Vasco Radius SMS OTP

    Hello folks,
    I have what seems to be a complex implementation with many things that need to be done on a customers network and I wanted to be pointed in the right direction.
    The current scenario is such, the customer has a Cisco WLC 2500 device that has 3 access points(these are in the same AP group) connected to it. There is one SSID that I will call PRODUCTION here that some domain users use to connect to the local network. The customer has requested to have a GUEST SSID added to the WLC where guest users will connect to and recieve a SMS OTP for authentication.
    Correct me if I am wrong, but I will obviously need to segment the SSIDs to have them running on different subnets to ensure that guest users do not have access to the production network once they authenticate. In order to do this I will need to configure Dynamic VLAN assignment for the Cisco WLC and connect it to a 802.1x port on the switch.
    Now what is not clear is I am not interested in authenticating the users that connect via "Production SSID" and want to bypass authentication for those users and have them assigned to the default vlan (or maybe perhaps have them authenticate via LDAP on the AD), however I want to force the "GUEST" SSID users to authenticate so that they may recieve an SMS OTP (reason for this is to force guests to register their phone numbers to use the internet so that Illegal activity may be tracked).
    1)So would it be possible to bypass authentication(or authenticate them via LDAP) for the PRODUCTION SSID as only domain users would know the SSID password to log on and have them by default assigned to the production subnet (default vlan) but force the GUEST SSID users to another VLAN via 802.1x sms otp?
    2)*Important* Another issue that is not clear is will I be able to directly configure AAA Radius settings on the Cisco WLC to directly authenticate with the VASCO Radius OTP and recieve a challenge-response(required for OTP) during authentication? As I have seen from Ciscos Dynamic VLAN assignment docuementation (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a008076317c.shtml) additional IETF Radius Perimeters are used such as Tunnel-Private-Group-ID etc are used which I can't seem to configure on the Vasco.
    I do beileve this is a great project in helping me understand the INs and OUTs of CISCO WLC as well as Wireless NAC, If anyone could enlighten me and point me in the right direction I would be forever in debt. Much appreciated.
    Best Regards
    Sinan Barghouthi - JNCIA-FWV , JNCIA-IDP , CCA-NS , TCSM-8.0

    On your WLAN you can enable AES and TKIP. Just know that some clients mau have issue when they see both TKIP and AES. Ive had pretty good success with this in the past. Dont forget, you also need to enable WMM allowed to get N rates.
    But you will need to configure AES on the client as well to support N rates.
    "Satisfaction does not come from knowing the solution, it comes from knowing why." - Rosalind Franklin
    ‎"I'm in a serious relationship with my Wi-Fi. You could say we have a connection."

  • Cisco WLC 5508 - NPS Radius

    Cisco WLC 5508
    Software Version: 7.4.100.0
    Windows Server 2008R2
    I've got everything setup on the Windows Server 2008 side of things (certificates, radius clients, etc)
    I added the radius server on the WLC, and configured a new WLAN to use it.
    Both are on the same subnet.
    When trying to conect to the WLAN it kept failing.  I installed wireshark on the server to monitor the radius traffic, and to my surprise there was no radius traffic showing up on the server.  The radius statistics on the WLC are at 0 as well, so it's like the WLC isn't even attempting Radius.
    I reverified that the server was enabled on both the security tab and the WLAN itself on the WLC.  Rebooted the controller and the server, all to no avail.  I used a radius test client, and can successfully send radius commands to the server using that utility.
    Frustrated, I just kept trying to reconnect on my wireless device, and after about the 15th try, finally I saw radius activity on wireshark.  It rejected my access, but at least I saw activity.  It also registerd radius statistcs on the WLC as well.
    So now if I keep trying to connect repeatedly, about every dozen or so times the WLC actually will send a radius request to the server.
    What in the world is going on here?

    I do have local management users on the controller.
    Some hours later I added the option of authenticating management users, for the NPS server. Then logged inn to the management GUI using NPS radius, worked just fine.
    However, these commands have been useful to me several times, to make sure unsuccessful requests appear in the Windows Event log:
    auditpol /get /subcategory:"Network Policy Server"
    If it shows ‘No auditing’ or just "Success", you can run this command to enable it:
    auditpol /set /subcategory:"Network Policy Server" /success:enable /failure:enable
    So now I know that the NPS radius server works, for management access. I will go to the customer's site some other day to test it for 802.1x authentication. If not, I'll do some debugging to decide wihich to blame - the WLC or NPS.

  • Cisco WLC 5508 not sending SNMP Traps

    Hello Everyone.
    I'm having a weird error on our WLC environment. We have an HA with two cisco WLC 5508 and i cannot get SNMP Traps working on a Windows PC running Kiwi Syslog server (free ed.).
    I can receive correctly Syslog messages, but not traps.
    I Tried also to send SNMP Traps from WLC to a different PC using Linux with snmptrapd and it works fine.
    I tried then to send from my Linux box a snmp trap to my Windows PC, and it works fine, but i still cannot receive anything from WLC.
    Using Wireshark to detect traffic, i cannot see any packet on udp port 162.
    I cannot figure out any problem with my scenario, but i can see the following errors on syslog:
    *rmgrTrasport: Mar 30 16:08:22.602: #RMGR-3-INVALID_PING_RESPONSE: rmgr_utils.c:270 Ping response from <my_windows_PC> is invalid. Ip address do not match.
    My WLC Version is 7.6.130.0
    Thank you for your support.

    I have gone through your query and found the following fruitful links ,please let me know if it helps and mark it correct answer if it is.
    https://www.manageengine.com/network-monitoring/help/userguide/processing_traps.html
    https://rscciew.wordpress.com/2014/10/12/snmp-configuration-on-wlc/
    Thanks :)

Maybe you are looking for

  • Languages in Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro

    Hi, I have a question regarding what languages Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro works in and can recognise. I need to confirm if the following lanaguages can be recognised in this above program... Arabic, Aramaic and Mathematical & Scientific characters and formu

  • I installed OSXYosemite 10.10.3 and have been unable to access my photos in iPhoto

    I installed OS X Yosemite 10.10.3 and have been unable to access my photos on iPhoto - in fact, I have  been unable to even get iPhoto to open.  I read that I should download iPhoto 9.6.1 but have been unable to even find it.  There was a suggestion

  • Urgent Problem in Report Dev 2000

    hi I have called a report in the following way com:='R30CLI32 server=repserver      report='||store_var||'\reports\NOTDONE.rdf userid='||user||'/'||pass||                ' destype=file desname='||store_var1||'\'||:global.vc_comp_code||:global.module_

  • How to batch change Caption with version name?

    I'm using Aperture 3.0.2. I want to caption the photos based on version name. This way when I export the photos from Aperture to Picasaweb, the caption will show. This will allow the visitors to tell me which image proof that I need to re-touch.

  • Compressor wont cancel

    Hi there How can I force compressor to cancel  compression ? I have clicked on cancel but it is not cancelling When I force quitting and resend new compression jobs those that I wanted to cancel before still appear as active even though "cancelling"