Question CPU speed VS RAM speed

I am tweaking my new worstation.
I have an Asus p6t ws professional. I7 960
24 G DDR3 tripple channel ram (Patriot Level 7 Viper II)
I am new to overclocking and I up to now I don't know how to solve this propblem.
If I overclock the CPU by putting the BCLK frenquency to 160, with default multiplier at 25, I clock 4.07
But, when I check the speed of my RAM with CPU-Z, I get a clock of 490 (!!!) so time two 980 (not even the 533 x2 to 1066)
If I put my bios to XMP mode I get my ram to 1600, but my cpu is about 3.4 (close to normal 3.2)
How can I OC to 4.0 with 24 G RAM at 1600?
The mother board manual say it acccept 1600 RAM but (OC) And THEY SAY THAT iNTEL SPECIFICATION, IN xmp mode, DDR3-1600 are supported for one DIMM per channel only (does that mean I cn only put 16 gig in channel A,B and C If I want 1600 OR 24G butr at a lower clock around 1066?
IF I am stucked in making choices and can't have it all (CPU 4.0 and 24D RAM-1600), WICH IS THE MOST IMPORTANT: CPU SPEED OR RAM SPEED?
I mostly edit P2 and wil be editing red and filmstock transfered.

Using a Gigabyte MB and cooling with water my i7-950 is rock stable at 4.3 with 24GB of 1600 G Skill RAM running at 1624; I have CPU turbo disabled and RAM XMP enabled and running at 1.5 volts.
Based on my clocks (BCLK 203, CPU 21, turbo off, QPI 36, MEM 8, and Uncore 16), I would suggest trying the following to reach 4.0 with your 1600 rated RAM:
BCLK 190
CPU 21
turbo off
QPI 36
MEM 8
Uncore 16
If that is not stable for your Asus, Try lowering BCLK until go get something that is. These settings would put your RAM at 1520 which would certainly be close to their maximum potential.
OC'ing can be time consuming; if this "formula" does not work for your system, then you really do need to go with the tried and true methodical approach.
Regarding which is more important for PPro I would say CPU speed is much more significant than RAM speed based on runs that making with Harm and Bill's ever so useful PPBM5 benchmark along my journey.
On another note, Cristobal on this forum informed me about "INTELBURN TEST" (Google it), which was a more rigerous torture test for stability than the ones that most people use (memtest, 3DMark, wPrime, etc.).
Good luck and do report back what works best for you in the end; it would be nice to report how your drives are set up too along with your PPBM5 results as well.
Jim

Similar Messages

Bus Speed and Ram Speed Question..thanks

I have recently purchased my first mac! I purchased a refurb but I noticed that the one I purchased has bus speed of 800mhz and the ram has 667mhz. (I did get a 320g hard drive vs a 250g and a 256mb graphics card vs a 128mb) The other one has bus speed of 1066mhz and ram speed has 800mhz. Am I going to notice a difference in the bus/ram speed difference or just stay with the one I purchased?
thanks

I don't think you will notice a difference. Other system factors (such as video card, system CPU clock speed, amount of RAM installed, speed of hard drive, etc.) will most likely overwhelm any noticeable difference cause by the slower bus speed.
If the price of the refurb was good, you should keep it. I have an online Apple Store refurb myself, and although I know that the latest iMacs are a bit faster, I don't see how that extra speed will be of great benefit to me. I'm much happier with the money I saved on the refurb compared to a new iMac.

Performance - Threads - Sys Resources = What's the CPU Speed n RAM ?

Hi all,
I am writing a small program based on quick port scanning (pure Java). For that purpose I'm using threads to make the connections. I am using multiple threads in parallel. While running 64 threads theres a 10% CPU usage whereas on 128 threads theres a 60% usage (On AMD 500 Mhz).
Now obviously I dont want anybody with a 233 Mhz running my program with 128 threads and surely not the one with 1 Ghz being limited to only 128 threads. Thats why I need to find out the clients resources like CPU speed, total RAM etc. How do I do that ?
Someone suggested using JNDI for windows registry. I'm not sure how to do it that way. (if anyone can provide me a little code?) Is there another way round to this problem?
Any help appreciated.

My friend
please try to understand the problem here is not of OPTIMIZATION OF THREAD SERVICES but the OPTIMAL NUMBER OF THREADS TO BE USED at certain processor speeds.
fine I agree about different performances of processors (pentium 1Ghz != AMD 1Ghz)
but surely (pentium 1Ghz ~ AMD 1Ghz ~ other 1Ghz).
and anyway in my program I'm taking the performance margins by 200Mhz to be on the safer side
i.e.
x1-x2 no of threads for say 300-500Mhz,
y1-y2 no of threads for 500-700Mhz,
z1-z2 no of threads for 700-1Ghz. Get the point.?
Heres an incomplete example of my prog (if now anyone can make out a fair idea of the problem) :
import java.net.*;
import java.io.*;
class QuickPortScan
public static void main(String args[])
long tstart,tend;
ScanThread scant=null;
String name=null,ok=null;
/* int tnum; This is the number of threads I want to calculate */
System.out.println(" Quick Port Scanner BLAH BLAH BLAH!");
System.out.print("-------------------BLAH BLAH BLAH!--------------\nEnter 'y' To Proceed: ");
try{
ok = new BufferedReader(new
InputStreamReader(System.in)).readLine();
if(ok.equals("Y")||ok.equals("y")){}
else{ System.exit(0); }
     System.out.print("Enter The HOSTNAME: ");
     name = new BufferedReader(new
     InputStreamReader(System.in)).readLine();} catch(IOException e){}
     System.out.println("Scanning 65,535 Ports, Please Be Patient...\n");
/* Now I would like to get the CPU speed here somehow
and then calculate tnum and pass it as param below */
tstart = System.currentTimeMillis();
for(int i=1;i<=tnum;i++)
     scant = new ScanThread(name,i /* ,tnum */);
     scant.start();
try{ scant.join(); }
catch(InterruptedException ine){ System.out.println("Main Thread Interrupted!"); }
     tend = System.currentTimeMillis();
     double ttaken = (tend-tstart)/1000;
     if(ttaken>59)
     System.out.println("Total Time Taken For Scan: "+(ttaken/60)+" minutes.");
     else System.out.println("Total Time Taken For Scan: "+ttaken+" seconds.");
} //END QuickPortScan class
class ScanThread extends Thread
String name;
int port,tno;
/* int nloop; This is the number of sleep-break loops calculated according to number of threads */
Socket sock;
static boolean scanFirst = true;
boolean breakOut = false,breakIn = false;
public ScanThread(String nm,int i /* ,int j */)
     name = nm;
     port = i;
     tno = i;
/* nloop = (j * whatever + whenever - together); */
public void run()
     for(int round1=1;round1<=32 /*nloop otherwise*/;round1++)
     if(breakOut==true){ break; }
     for(int round2=1;round2<=32;round2++)
try{
/* SOCKET
CONNECTION
IMPLEMENTATION */
     }     try{sleep(75);}catch(InterruptedException ie){}
public synchronized void portInc(int open)
     if(open==1){System.out.println("Port "+port+" Vulnerable!, Scanning...");}
     if(port==16384){System.out.println("25% Completed, Scanning Further...");}
     else if(port==32768){System.out.println("50% Completed, Scanning Further...");}
     else if(port==49152){System.out.println("75% Completed, Scanning Further...");}
     port = port + nt; // nt is the NUMBER OF THREADS
     if(port>=65536){if(scanFirst==true){System.out.println("*****SCAN COMPLETE!*****");
     scanFirst=false;} breakOut=true; breakIn=true;}
} // END ScanThread class

Questions about RAM speed.

I'm a bit confused by this, how it relates to CPU speed, FSB speed, double-pumped this, quad-pumped that. I know my RAM is working harder on account of having to up the voltage on it, but I can't work out how or why. The BIOS is about as illuminating as a cellar, the manual doubly so.
I have a Q6600, Corsair Dominator 8500, on an MSI P7N Platinum.
I've got the Q6600 up to three and a bit ghz, had to up some of the voltages to get it stable in Prime95. So far so good, but I don't have a clue what the RAM is actually doing. In both manual and linked modes...no difference. I see that I can set the RAM manually, in both modes, to 1066 or more (1066 is it's rated top frequency), but I'm not sure if that's real speed or a multiplier of something. At the moment it shows in the BIOS:
FSB Clock: 1350
Mem Clock: 800
Adjusted DRAM Frequency: 798
I've changed the timings from 5.5.5.18 to 4.4.4.12
If I change the RAM to 1066 what will happen? Is that actually 4 x 1066, and it'll blow up? 2 x 1066? What is the 798? What actual 'true' RAM speed am I seeing at "800/798"? Why doesn't "Linked" automatically set the RAM speed appropriately per the OC'd CPU speed? What about this "ratio" thing, where I've read that the best is 1:1? Mine is currently at 13:11
What I want is the RAM operating at top speed, regardless of the CPU being OC'd or stock. The required voltage increase seems to suggest it is, but the numbers say otherwise.
Any help/advice/input would be gratefully received. I've read a whole bunch of guides but none of those I've been able to find cover this area in any detail.
Edit: Ok, I've noticed in Everest that the Memory Bus is 398.9, which doubles-up to the 798 in the Adjusted DRAM Frequency field in the BIOS. Eg, 800mhz. So, if my RAM is rated for 1066 I could enter that into the BIOS and see my Memory Bus do 533mhz? I'm assuming that the 4.4.4.12 timings I've achieved have come out of the overhead I'm saving by running the RAM at 800mhz?
If so, which give the greater performance benefit (in games mainly), 4.4.4.12 at 800mhz, or 5.5.5.18 at 1066mhz?

Quote from: AaronYuri on 11-May-08, 21:21:03
No, the memory frequency isn't bottle necked by the FSB. The FSB is just the base for calculating the memory frequency.
Oh well, that doesn't mean much to me. But from what I can gather from the thread you linked there isn't much advantage to running the RAM at 1066 vs 800 anyway, as the performance difference I'd see in games would be negligible.
Thanks Aaron.

Mixing RAM Speeds In iMac G4 1GHz 17" Flat-Panel?

I'm just checking here.
I have an iMac G4 1GHz 17" Flat-Panel, Model M8935LL/A (USB 1.1 version) that currently has the standard 256MB PC2100 (266 MHz) RAM module installed in the factory slot, and a 512MB PC2700 (333 MHz) RAM module installed in the bottom (user-accessible) slot. I bought the machine direct from Apple, so despite the "official" spec (which calls for PC2100 RAM in both slots), it's obvious that Apple knows PC2700 RAM will work in that machine. My understanding is that the faster PC2700 RAM simply downclocks to accommodate the lower 266 MHz bus speed of the M8935LL/A. As I understand the DDR SDRAM spec, any DDR SDRAM (PC1600 through PC3200) module will simply overclock or underclock to accommodate the host bus speed...but feel free to correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.
I'm fixing to upgrade the hard drive to a larger capacity model. I've done it before, so I know it's no picnic. Since I have to go past the factory RAM slot anyway to change the hard drive, I figure I might as well upgrade the internal RAM to the full 1GB limit. (Yes...I know Apple says you can't exceed 512MB in either slot, so please—no remonstrances about sticking to Apple's spec. The spec is wrong.)
Obviously, it's possible to mix the two RAM speeds between the two slots, since Apple shipped the computer that way. Here are my questions:
• Is there any downside to going the other way when I upgrade the RAM—that is, putting a 1GB PC2700 (184-pin) module in the factory slot, and a 1GB PC2100 (200-pin) module in the user slot? The reason I ask is because my preferred supplier (OWC) can't supply me with both modules in the same speed.
• Is there any performance advantage in both modules being the same speed—that is, both PC2100 or both PC2700? If not, I'll just buy the one of each speed that OWC has available.
Thanks!

jjw wrote:
So, you know have 2Gb available in your flat screen imac?
Yes indeed—2GB confirmed as available by Apple System Profiler. Both modules are PC2700. Everything is working fine.
I guess I can understand why Apple discourages users from replacing the 184-pin "factory slot" module. There's not a whole lot of slack in the motherboard connector cables, so it's best to disconnect them in order to get the bottom section to lie flat on the workbench. I suppose some folks might be hesitant about disconnecting things, but it's really quite simple, and involves only three connectors. After having changed the hard drive a few years ago, replacing the RAM was a piece of cake by comparison.
A word of caution to anyone who's going to attempt it, though. There are TWO heat sink interfaces between the bottom section (where the motherboard is mounted) and the top dome. Those heat sink surfaces are coated with thermal paste at the factory, but the compound dries out over time, becoming a rubbery membrane between the heat sink surfaces. Once you separate the top and bottom sections, the membrane rips apart, and the firm connection between the heat sink surfaces is permanently gone. It's a bad idea to simply put them back together after you change the RAM module; you won't get a good thermal connection.
The solution is to scrape all of the old rubbery compound off all four surfaces (two on the bottom and two on the top section). I did it with a piece of PVC, but you can use anything with a sharp edge that won't scratch the metal surface—even your fingernails will work, unless the old compound has dried out to the point where it's hard. After you scrape the old gunk off, apply new thermal paste to all four surfaces.
The other maintenance item you can perform while you're in there is cleaning out all the dust, which accumulates in vast quantities and interferes with cooling. I vacuumed it out with a plastic crevice tool, being careful NOT to touch any of the components with the tool. Vacuuming can build up a static charge on the tool, especially in dry environments, and high static voltages aren't friendly to microprocessors. I used a securely grounded anti-static wrist strap throughout the entire operation, and even wrapped it around the vacuum tool.
Good luck!

SIS 648 Max RAM speed

How can i set RAM speed? Plz give me step by step exp
I have 512 DDR 400 ram, will it work? I didnt find any 512 ram in tested hardware on this board.
Tom

Hi Tommen,
I can not give no a step by step guide, for that I know to little. Under the "Frequency/Voltage Control" you can set the CPU/DRAM ratio. When you change the ratio you can see the DRAM freq. just below. For DDR400 it should say 200MHz.
In the "Advanced chipset.." you can set CAS latency, timing and command rate. These settings are depending on what kind of RAM you have, and would also effect the RAM speed.
But if you have read this forum a bit you probably have seen that a lot of us using DDR400 in this MB have had problems.
In addition MSI has the program "Fuzzy Logic" but few of us (if any) has been able to use it with success for this MB.
I'm intresting to here how your DDR 400 is working?
My 512 DDR400 was working perfectly except from when rebooting I had to turn off og on the PS. To get it working as it should I had to set it as DDR333 (shown as 167MHz in bios), and set timing to Normal.
Everyone else....please feel free to correct me..

Setting in BIOS to change RAM speed in an ATC-605?

Is there a way to enable or see the settings in the BIOS to alter RAM speed and timings? I know a lot of things are locked away compared to a normal built system, but is there a way to do this? Looking to see if I can enable XMP and up my RAM speed to its appropriate speeds.

Are you talking about the stock memory in your computer? Or you've added some different memory? I think the max it can do is the JEDEC standard for the motherboard which is DDR3-1600 CL11 (I think). Even if the BIOS did support XMP. I don't think it would do much good since you can't overclock the CPU. Neither the locked Haswell CPUs or H81E chipset support overclocking on the TC-605s. So wouldn't the performance gain would be tiny without the ability to overclock the CPU......? I was actually thinking about buying some 1600/1866 just for curiousity sake, but I get the feeling it would bump down to 1600 due to that JEDEC standard which is out of Acer's control. I have the i5 4440 which says it only supports 1600 max. http://ark.intel.com/products/75038/Intel-Core-i5-4440-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_30-GHz I don't know though, I'm not an overclocker....so maybe somebody can give you a better answer. Anyway, the TC-605 is more of a mainstream desktop. Don't get me wrong, you can max it out to 16GB ram and...... At this point, I've added to one of my tc-605s...a SSD with the ram cache enabled, and added some additional ram. It's pretty quick. Now I just have to pull the trigger on that gtx 750ti-sc (if it will fit in the case) Edit: If you're using CPU-Z or Speccy, and you're using the ram that came with the tc-605, it should give a frequency of around 800 Mhz. Which would be 1600 since it's DDR=DoubleDataRate. I think when I checked it said something like 798.1 Mhz...which is close enough to 800 Mhz.

Mixing RAM Speeds...No Ben Hur jokes please ;)

Is it ok to mix RAM speeds. Somehow I purchased some RAM awhile back that was PC2-3200U-255 for my Quad. Oops, I never noticed that is wasn't what came with the computer, the 4200-444. Well, I just bought some more RAM at 4200-444, and noticed that I had varying speeds. Will this variation pose any problems?
Thanks!!

Thanks for the link Josef. Very informative. Unfortunately, I am still confused (my permanent state).
So I checked my invoice from my purchase and it looks like I purchased 5300 instead of the 3200 that is showing in "System Profiler". I opened up the computer and indeed it is 5300. So, is mixing the 4200 and 5300 a no no? Is the 5300 in fact being read as 3200? And doesn't the other RAM automatically run at the lowest speed, no matter what speed is highest?
Thanks, sorry that I don't get it. I did searches and am still confused.
Slow learner,
fatlanglois

How do I know if my CPU has decreased speed or what speed my cpu is running?

I recently noticed that when running PRO app my MBP seems pretty slow unusually. I have met this occasion before . I heard that when temperture is too high , the CPU will decrease its speed to protect itself. How do I know if my CPU has decreased speed or what speed my cpu is running?
Thank you!
MBP 8,2 10.6.8

Enter in the search field of Google 'CPU speed monitors' and you should get some results.
Ciao.

Fcp - ram speed, bus speed, and 64 bit processing

how much do these (ram speed, bus speed, and 64 bit processing) specs play a role in fcp's performance? I hear conflicting opinions about it's utilization of the 64 bit processor(s). some say yes some say no. is ram speed from one rev to the next that much different, particularly in the last two G5's? Or, is the amount of ram and the processor type the most important considerations in optimizing fcp performance? thanks for your help!

SD/SDI card is to bring in video material in formats other than DV. If all you will ever work in is DV or HDV, firewire only is fine. If you want to work with non-DV formats and without expansion slots, you need to look into something like the AJA io to do your conversion and bring it down firewire. This solution has its own potential problems when the device and the hard drives are on the same bus.
You need a second drive just for media. On the Powermac you simply add a second internal drive. This is not possible on the iMac - an external firewire drive is the only option. This by itself is not an issue. Most people who do this with any seriousness end up adding a series of external hard drives to deal with the mass of media.
The limiting factor is that you only have one firewire bus (all macs have only one firewire bus) and if you run into problems with the camera (or VTR or AJA io) & hard drives not cooperating on one bus, you have no option to fix it. On the iMac, you have no option to add in a card to create a second firewire bus in the system.
So yes, the people at the store are correct. You can make the iMac work (with an external firewire drive). However, if you run into problems, you have severely limited options to mediate them. What I was trying to suggest is some things work better. An analogy might be, If I need to drive nails, the handle of a screwdriver can be made to work, but I should not be surprised if it does it badly and breaks when pushed hard.
good luck.

CPU fan running full speed after 15 minutes

My 3 month old iMac 24" has just started having fan problems.
Before I went away on a training course, it was working fine. Left it switched off at the outlet for 3 days, now the CPU fan runs full speed after the iMac has been switched on for 15 to 20 minutes.
CPU temp is 24C, CPU heatsink is 28C. Ambient is 17C. CPU fan is 3600rpm. Other fans are normal.
CPU usage is less that 10%. Only Safari is running.
I've tried resetting the SMC - left all plugs disconnected for 15 minutes, reconnected mains power for 15 minutes, reconnected USB, then switched on.
Still the same - OK for 15 minutes, then CPU fan runs full speed.
Anything else that I can try?

I tried again, following your instructions exactly. It seemed to work, running normally for about an hour.
I left all the USB devices unplugged, except for the keyboard and mouse.
I then shut the iMac down, but left the mains power turned on at the wall. When I switched it on again 2 hours later, all was OK for 15 minutes, then the CPU fan ran at full speed.
Shutting down for a few seconds fixes it for another 15 minutes.
I'm wondering if it's a software problem, although I haven't loaded any apps recently, apart from a few monitoring programs since this problem appeared.
Last night I left it running the extended hardware test for a couple of hours, and the fans were fine.
One thing that I noticed yesterday was that the "GPU" temperature readings in iStat were all missing (just "-" displayed) for a couple of seconds when I clicked on Dashboard. Is there a way to keep iStat open while I'm using the iMac?
I think I'll try booting XP and see what happens.

Satellite C855 - Average CPU temperature and fan speed

Hello!
I've had this toshiba Satellite C855 since march this year. it's only recently that the CPU temp and Fan speeds have been worrying me.
When I'm not playing games or doing a livestream my CPU temp stays around 35-40% with the fanspeed at steady 50% or not on at all due to it been cool.
When I do play games however the fanspeed is going up to around 66-68% with the CPU been around 55-60%
I was wondering if this is normal? or do I need to clean it out by taking it apart. if it is the second option then I am worried since I do not want to damage anything inside. plus I am not that great with the inner workings of a computer.
Any help or information would be very appreciated thanks.

In my opinion there is no reason for panic. T is logic that under stress CPU activity is higher and CPU produces more heat. Notebook must be cooled down properly so sensors that control cooling fans register growing temperature and cooling fans will run on higher speed.
There is no reason for cleaning. And one day if that must be done please dont do it alone. You are not authorized for doing this.

Is there a free app that allows me to show cpu temp and fan speed in menu bar?

i want a free app that monitors cpu temp and fan speed and can display them in the menu bar of my MBA

http://www.apple.com/downloads/dashboard/status/istatpro.html

USB/FireWire usage increases CPU temp and fan speed

Hi,
I'm curious, does the usage of USB and FireWire ports increase CPU temperature and fan speed...?
I have an M-Audio Fast Track USB interface plugged in and whenever I play any songs from iTunes using that interface as an output, my CPU temp increased and fan speed jumped from 2000 to 3300 rpm. And on separate occasion, an 8GB of file transfer from an external FireWire-based HDD had both fans speed up to 4,400 rpm.
Is this normal...? All these were done with an external display plugged onto the MBP with "clamshell" mode.

USB operations involves quite a bit of CPU action, Elphidieus.
Firewire places less demand on the CPU but, in a situation like the one you describe can involve both increases in power usage and in HD temperatures.
The fan speeds on Macs are not simply responsive to CPU usage. Both HD temps and power usage can also play a part in the equation that ultimately produces the fan speed. As HDs have much lower heat tolerance than CPUs you will find that it is quite common to see the fans ramp up when doing a large file transfer over FW (or USB, for that matter) , especially if the internal HD temp gets to over about 50-55º Celsius.
Cheers
Rod

Full speed or high speed on 975X ?

Hi,
(sorry for my poor level in english, i'm french ...)
Having trouble with my keyboard, i want to know if the USB ports are on full speed or high speed on my 975X platinum mainboard ?
Every 2 or 3 min, my keyboard freeze or slow down much (caracters appears every second !).
At the beginning, i was thinking that it's a typical XP problem ! So i made verifications in the registry and tried some optimisations... with no results.
In fact, after speaking with friends, i beleive that the USB ports are "confused" by the razer exchange rate (too high).
Is there a solution (software or in the bios i mean) ? I didn't see an option to setup this speed ... strange on this kind of mainboard.
Do i have to buy a specific USB controller for my razer (800 dpi / 1600 hz) ?
My config : Intel 6600 + 975X platinum + 2go RAM + windows xp pro sp2 + (Saitek gaming keyboard + Razer copperhead).
Thanks in advance for any response ...

Thanks all ! I dowloaded & installed the latest INTEL inf-update utility under a "admin session" (?).
It seems to work fine but i have again freezes every 5 or 6 min (before 2 or 3 min).
Now, for the USB Universal Host Controler the version number is : 8.2.0.1008 from sept 13 2006.
Something is strange in my config : when i read for every USB Universal Host Controler what it is consuming, i noticed differences.
1 : 14 % ressources
2 : 43 % ressources
3 : 10 % ressources
4 : 10 % ressources
5 : 10 % ressources
I know that this is controled by system but how can i understand these numbers ? Something is consuming most of the USB ressources ...
Is it the mouse (Razer Copperhead) ?
I will make a monitoring of the USB devices of the mouse and the keyboard in the same time with the "Device Monitoring Software" from HHD to try to understand what happen ...
Btw, if you have other ideas ...
After tomorow (on thuesday), i will by a specific usb controller for the mouse if i cant found a final solution to this s... problem.
Maesus :
for accessing HDD : i don't think that some application is working on HDD while i'm on another software ... i will see btw
for the virus, i think that i'm ok (but i will try another antivirus this night than mine : avast). no scanning activities / all manual scan
for spyware, i think that i'm also ok (ewido & spyware blaster & spy sweeper).
for CPU temp : it's between 40 and 50 (without any overclocking) ... Maybe the graphic card which is overclocked ...
Btw, thanks thanks thanks ... i will reply when a solution will be found.

Question CPU speed VS RAM speed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for